Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 7;10(10):10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0352. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0352

GAB2 - A Scaffolding Protein in Cancer

Sarah J Adams 1, Iraz T Aydin 1, Julide T Celebi 1
PMCID: PMC3810274  NIHMSID: NIHMS399548  PMID: 22871571

Abstract

Adaptor or scaffolding proteins mediate protein-protein interactions that drive the formation of protein complexes. GAB2 scaffolding protein is an intermediary molecule that links plasma membrane receptor signaling including receptor tyrosine kinases with the downstream effectors such as SHP2, p85 subunit of PI3K, PLCγ, CRK, SHC and SHIP. Although well described in signal transduction, its role in cancer has recently been emerging especially in leukemia, breast and ovarian cancer, and melanoma. GAB2 is essential for two major signal transduction pathways in cancer, thePI3K-AKT and ERK signaling pathways, and thus regulates a number of key cellular processes. This review focuses on structure and function of GAB2, its regulatory proteins, emerging role in cancer, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Keywords: Adaptor, scaffold, cancer, GAB2

Introduction

GAB2 (Grb2-Associated Binding Protein 2) is a scaffolding protein that contains various structural domains and docking sites that serve as a platform for the assembly of signaling systems. Although GAB2 itself lacks enzymatic activity, it acts downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases and non-receptor tyrosine kinases, such as cytokine and G protein-coupled receptors, to transmit and amplify signals to downstream effectors. Upon stimulation, GAB2 becomes phosphorylated on critical tyrosine residues, creating binding sites for diverse targets involved in signal transduction. As such, GAB2 serves as a mediator of essential cellular processes including proliferation, survival, migration, and differentiation.

GAB2 belongs to a family of evolutionarily-conserved proteins consisting of three mammalian paralogues, GAB1, GAB2, and GAB3, D. melanogaster homologue DOS (Daughter Of Sevenless), and C. elegans homologue SOC1 (Suppressor Of Clear). Family members show a 40–50% sequence homology but are associated with unique cellular functions (1). Both GAB1 and GAB2 are expressed ubiquitously, but they are most highly expressed in brain, kidney, lung, heart, testis, and ovary (2). GAB3 also has a widespread expression pattern, although it is most highly expressed in lymphoid tissue (2). The role of GAB proteins in signal transduction has been extensively reviewed in the literature (25). This paper will instead focus on GAB2 with an emphasis on its emerging role in human cancer.

Structural Motifs and Binding Partners of GAB2

GAB proteins contain a number of highly conserved structural motifs that mediate their interaction with binding partners including an N-terminal Pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, a central proline-rich domain, and multiple phospho-tyrosine residues (Figure 1) (3, 6). The PH domain binds to cell membrane phospholipids, preferentially phosphatidylinositol phosphates (7, 8), and plays a role in the membrane localization of GAB2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of GAB2 signaling and the GAB2 protein structure. The two main effector arms of GAB2 signaling, SHP2-ERK and PI3K-AKT, are shown. Structural domains of the GAB2 protein including an N-terminal PH domain critical for membrane localization and central proline-rich regions mediating interactions with SH2- and SH3-domain containing proteins are indicated. Interacting partners of GAB2 such as GRB2, p85, SHP2, CRK, PLCγ, and 14-3-3 are shown.

The proline-rich domain contains numerous PXXP motifs, which serve as docking sites for Src homology 3 (SH3) domain-containing proteins. GAB2 constitutively associates with the Grb2 adaptor protein through a “canonical” (PXXPXR) and “atypical” (PXXXRXXKP) SH3 binding motif (9). GRB2 is the main upstream regulator of GAB2 and indirectly recruits it to activated plasma membrane receptors. These include RTKs (EGFR, KIT), cytokine receptors (IL-1, IL-3, IL-15, TPO, EPO, KITL, M-CSF, Flt310, gp130), Fc receptors (FcεR1, FcγR1), T and B cell antigen receptors, and G protein-coupled receptors (2). GRB2 binds GAB2 via its C-terminal SH3 domain and the complex associates with membrane receptors by binding to phosphorylated tyrosine residues on their intracellular domain (10). Certain receptors do not have GRB2 binding sites, such as the β chain of IL-2 and IL-3 receptors. These signaling cascades require a SHC protein to serve as an additional bridging adaptor between tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors and the GRB2-GAB2 complex (11, 12).

GAB2 harbors multiple tyrosine residues that are phosphorylated upon activation of signal transduction. These critical phospho-tyrosine moieties are capable of interacting with Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing proteins and mediate the interaction of GAB2 with downstream effectors such as SHP2, p85, PLCγ, CRK, SHC and SHIP (6). GAB2 plays a central role in the propagation of MAPK and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways. Binding of GAB2 to SHP2 activates ERK (GAB2-SHP2-ERK) and MAPK signaling. This well-defined relationship is dependent on tyrosine residues Y614 and Y643 in GAB2, which engage the SH2 domain of SHP2 (6). Conversely, docking of the P85 subunit of PI3K onto Y452, Y476, and Y584 of GAB2 leads to the activation of AKT (GAB2-p85-AKT) (6).

GAB2 forms complexes with a variety of proteins whose functional significance has not been fully characterized. In osteoclasts, PLCγ2 binds GAB2, is required for GAB2 phosphorylation, and modulates GAB2 recruitment to RANK, thereby regulating osteoclastogenesis (13). 14-3-3 proteins have an inhibitory effect on GAB2 signaling. They bind to S210 and T391 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner and attenuate GAB2-mediated signal transduction. This may be due to the disassembly of GAB2-GRB2 complexes or shifting of the equilibrium between GAB2-GRB2 and GAB2-14-3-3 complexes favoring the latter (14). A GTP-ase activating protein for the Rho family, named GC-GAP, interacts with both GAB1 and GAB2. GC-GAP is highly expressed in the brain, co-localizes with GAB2 at the cell membrane, and stimulates GTPase activity of the Rho family of small GTPases (15). SHIP-1 and SHIP-2 are SH2 domain-containing inositol 5′-phosphatases that hydrolyze PIP(3,4,5)3 to PIP(3,4)2 and have been shown to associate with GAB2 (16, 17). Both SHIP-1 and-2 act as negative regulators of mast cell activation upon high affinity IgE receptor (FCεRI) stimulation (17, 18). GAB2 is also involved in propagating the type I interferon response and likely competes with IFNAR 2 for binding to IFNAR 1 (19).

Genomic Studies in Cancer

DNA amplification is a common mechanism leading to oncogenic activation in human cancer. GAB2 is located on chromosomal band 11q14.1. Amplification of 11q13-14.1 is frequently observed in human malignancies (20). CCND1 located on 11q13.2 has long been considered the key gene driving this amplicon (21, 22). However, the large size of 11q13-14.1 (~9–10 Mb), the presence of other potential proto-oncogenes in this region, and the identification of narrow amplicons telomeric and distinct from CCND1 suggest the possibility of multiple drivers underlying these amplifications. Studies have identified several candidates including EMS1, EMSY, PAK1, RSF1 and GAB2 (23).

The identification of GAB2 as a potential oncogene comes from studies in breast (24, 25) and ovarian cancer (23), leukemia (26) and melanoma (27). 11q13-14.1 is amplified in approximately 10–15% of breast cancers (28) and GAB2 is overexpressed in human primary breast cancer tumors and cell lines as compared to normal ductal epithelium (29). Eight percent of human breast carcinomas demonstrate upregulation of GAB2 by gene expression analysis and a subset of these have concomitant genomic amplification (24). Evaluation of DNA copy number changes in 172 primary breast cancers by comparative genomic hybridization shows a proximal amplicon at 11q13.2-13.3 spanning CCND1 in 28% of cases and a distal amplicon at 11q13.5-14.1 with a 15% frequency (25). The distal amplicon occurs without co-amplification at CCND1 in 3% of cases, suggesting a distinct driver event. The smallest common region spans ALG8, KCTD21, USP35 and GAB2.

Similar copy number profiles are observed in melanoma. GAB2 was amplified in 11% of 64 human metastatic melanoma samples and 20 cell lines examined by array-comparative genomic hybridization, and a subset occurred without co-amplification of CCND1 (27). When taken together, these genomic studies validate the presence of a distinct amplicon in human cancer at 11q13.5-14.1 that is independent of the CCND1 locus. Functional studies implicate GAB2 as a driving event (24, 27).

GAB2 and Breast Cancer

The mechanisms by which GAB2 contributes to breast cancer pathogenesis are beginning to be elucidated (29, 30). GAB2 contributes to an invasive and metastatic phenotypein breast carcinogenesis. Overexpression of GAB2 in MCF10A cells, an immortalized human mammary epithelial cell line, results in increased proliferation and altered dependency on EGF and other growth factors (31). Conversely, silencing of GAB2 in several breast cancer cell lines harboring genomic amplifications leads to a decrease in proliferation, attributed to slowed cell cycle progression and increased apoptosis, and a reduction in their invasive potential (25).

Studies show that GAB2 alone is insufficient to transform primary mammary epithelial cells. However, it can cooperate with other proto-oncogenes, such as ErbB2 (Neu or HER2) and Src, to potentiate tumorigenic signaling. GAB2 acts downstream of ErbB2 and is tyrosyl phosphorylated upon activation of signal transduction (24). GAB2 and ErbB2 are co-amplified in a subset of breast cancers and co-expression of GAB2 with ErbB2 leads to an invasive multiacinar phenotype in a three-dimensional culture system. This effect is mediated via downstream GAB2-SHP2-Erk signaling and is independent of PI3K-AKT activation (24). Transgenic mice with mammary-specific overexpression of GAB2 do not show a significant tumor phenotype. However, when crossed with mice overexpressing ErbB2, an accelerated rate of tumor onset is observed (24). Notably, in ErbB2-driven transgenic mouse models, the deletion of GAB2 has only a minor effect on the initiation and growth of mammary tumors, but strongly suppresses the development of pulmonary metastases. In this model, GAB2-deficient tumor cells proliferate normally but display impaired motility in vitro, which can be rescued by the introduction of wild-type GAB2. These effects are mediated by impaired activation of ERK/MAPK signaling and occur independently of the AKT pathway (32).

GAB2 not only cooperates with receptor tyrosine kinases but also with receptor-associated kinases of the SRC family. This relationship was first defined in primary hepatocytes where GAB2 was shown to be tyrosine phosphorylated by c-SRC in response to EGF treatment, leading to downstream activation of PI3K (33). Both GAB2 and c-SRC are overexpressed in breast cancer and their co-transfection in MCF10A cells promotes a growth advantage and EGF-independence (34). In addition, expression of GAB2 together with the viral oncoprotein v-SRC (35) or the activated c-SRC-Y527F mutant (36) brings about the dissociation of three-dimensional spheroids in culture, creating a highly dispersed and disrupted acinar morphology. This is thought to be mediated via localized GAB2-SRC-PI3K signaling at the cell-cell junction, which disrupts the integrity and binding strength of E-cadherin with resultant loss of cellular adhesion (34). Furthermore, these cells demonstrate increased migration and invasion but these effects are independent of PI3K activation (34). Finally, overexpression of GAB2 in MCF10A cells promotes anchorage-independent growth, leading to larger and more numerous colonies on soft agar. These effects are dependent on SRC signaling and the downstream activation of the oncogenic transcription factor, STAT3 (37).

Additional insight into the role of GAB2 on cell motility, invasiveness, and thus metastatic spread is obtained through studies examining its effects on Rho family of GTPases. RhoA promotes the formation of contractile actomyosin stress fibers and focal adhesions. GAB2 when overexpression in MCF10A mammary epithelial cells was found to decrease activation of RhoA, lead to delayed cell spreading, a decrease in stress fibers and mature focal adhesions, and enhanced cell migration (38). Modulation of focal adhesions and stress fibers by GAB2 was dependent on the SHP2-binding sites. These studies shed light onto mechanisms of GAB2-mediated cancer progression.

GAB2 signaling in breast cancer results in the activation of numerous downstream effectors that contributes to cancer development. A genomic ‘signature’ of 205 transcripts was obtained from GAB2 overexpressing, anchorage-independent MCF10A cells and was found to correlate with metastatic relapse in patients, independent of existing clinical and genomic classifiers (37). This suggests a novel role for GAB2 and its transcriptional targets as a biomarker for the prediction of metastatic disease.

microRNAs (miRNA) posttranscriptionally repress gene expression mostly by recognizing complementary target sites in the 3′-untranslated region of target mRNAs. The human let-7 miRNA family consists of 13 members located in 8 genomic regions frequently deleted in human cancers. Among the let-7 family of miRNAs, let-7g was found to have reduced expression that correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in breast cancer patients (39). Repression of let-7g expression led to increased GAB2 and fibronectin I expression, which, in turn, cooperatively increased the activity of ERK, MMP-2 and MMP-4. This exemplifies yet another mechanism of GAB2 regulation in breast carcinogenesis.

GAB2 and Leukemia

GAB2 regulates hematopoietic cell survival and proliferation. Although GAB2 knockout mice are viable and grossly normal in appearance, they harbor certain select defects as a result. These mice lack a proper allergic response, which is the result of impaired FcεRI stimulation in mast cells and is PI3K dependent (40). Their bone marrow is osteopetrotic due to decreased RANK-mediated osteoclast differentiation (41) and, while their bone marrow cellularity and peripheral blood counts are normal, there is defective hematopoiesis as a result of decreased proliferation and attenuation of PI3K-AKT and ERK/MAPK signaling in response to early-acting cytokines (42). In addition, GAB2 ablation results in defective expansion of colony stimulating factor 1 receptor-dependent mononuclear phagocyte progenitors in the bone marrow through decreased proliferation and survival (43).

GAB2 mediates a critical role in leukemogenic signaling driven by oncogenic fusion tyrosine kinases. This has been best studied in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), which is caused by a translocation between chromosome 9 and 22; t(9;22)(q34;q11), creating BCR-ABL, a constitutively active fusion tyrosine kinases capable of transforming hematopoietic stem cells (44). The auto-phosphorylated Tyr177 residue on BCR-ABL recruits the GRB2-GAB2 complex, which can then activate several divergent pathways involved in promoting leukemogenesis, including RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, PI3K-AKT, and JAK-STAT (45). GAB2 is required for myeloid cell, but not lymphoid cell, transformation by BCR-ABL. Cells expressing mutant BCR-ABL-T177F show impaired ERK and AKT activation with diminished proliferation and spontaneous migration (45). Additionally, silencing of GAB2 or its downstream effectors, SHP2andSTAT5, leads to a decrease in cell proliferation and colony formation in BCR-ABL-mediated CML (46). Notably, GAB2 has a similar function in propagating oncogenic signaling derived from other fusion oncoproteins including TEL-ABL (47), TEL-JAK2 (48), NPM-ALK (49), and BCR-FGFR1 (50), as well as in SF-STK activation by Friend virus in murine erythroleukemia (51).

Treatment of CML with Imatinib, a small molecule inhibitor of BCR-ABL, has led to significant clinical success. However, resistance mechanisms have evolved including continuous activation of LYN kinase, which complexes with GAB2 and results in persistent phosphorylation of GAB2 and BCR-ABL. Downstream leukemogenic signaling persists in the presence or absence of Imatinib, and it is only in silencing of LYN, that drug sensitivity is restored (52).

Persistent activation of the transcription factor STAT5 is frequently found in hematological malignancies. GAB2 signals upstream of JAK-STAT and is an essential mediator of hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis (6). STAT5 and GAB2 double mutant mice show a significant reduction in stem cell number, reduced cell survival, and a dramatic loss of self-renewing potential (53). On the other hand, GAB2-mediated PI3K-AKT activation potentiates cell growth and survival in STAT5-induced leukemia (54).

GAB2 is a key mediator of leukemogenic signaling driven by SHP2 mutations. Somatic gain of function mutations in SHP2 cause juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (55). GAB2 is a direct binding partner of SHP2 and is required for the transformation of primary murine myeloid cells secondary to its ability to activate ERK, AKT, and STAT5 signaling (56). A knock-in mouse model with a SHP2D61G activating mutation leads to hyperactive stem cell functioning with accelerated stem cycling, expansion of the stem cell pool and improved repopulating capacities, which can bring about myeloproliferative disease. This aberrant hematopoietic signaling is rescued by the concomitant deletion of GAB2, which highlights this adaptors centrality in promoting oncogenesis (57).

GAB2 and Melanoma

The development of melanoma is inextricably linked to oncogenic activation of ERK and PI3K-AKT signaling (58, 59). GAB2 scaffolding protein is central to the propagation of these signaling cascades and has been implicated as a driver of melanomagenesis. GAB2 is expressed at significantly higher levels in metastatic melanomas as compared to primary melanomas and melanocytic nevi and can thus be seen as a marker of neoplastic progression. Silencing of GAB2 in metastatic melanoma cell lines leads to a decrease in their invasive potential, whereas overexpression in primary melanomas promotes migration and invasion. Additionally, in vivo studies show that overexpression of GAB2 leads to enhanced tumor growth and development of metastases (27).

While GAB2 cannot independently transform melanocytes, it can cooperate with other oncogenes to promote tumor development. GAB2 is co-expressed with mutant NRAS in a subset of melanomas and these proteins act in concert to promote a more aggressive phenotype. GAB2 overexpression leads to increased metastatic potential with anchorage independence in soft agar and xenograft studies demonstrate angiogenic switch as a result of upregulation of HIF-1α and VEGF (60).

GAB2 and Ovarian Cancer

Genomic amplifications of GAB2 have been described in approximately 15% of ovarian cancers (23). GAB2 overexpression is also seen at the mRNA level in serous cystadenocarcinoma tumors and at the protein level in several ovarian cancer cell lines (61). Exogenous overexpression of GAB2 in cell lines with low baseline expression promotes characteristics of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. These cells have increased migratory and invasive potential, assessed by wound healing and transwell migration assays, and show a downregulation of E-cadherin. Conversely, silencing of GAB2 in cell lines with high expression inhibits migration and invasion and causes an upregulation of E-cadherin. GAB2 mediates these effects by activating the PI3K pathway, which results in increased expression of Zeb1, a transcription factor involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (61). This novel GAB2-PI3K-ZEB1 pathway can be targeted by PI3K and mTOR inhibitors and can perhaps serve as a therapeutic target in the treatment of GAB2-driven ovarian cancer.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support

This work was supported by a grant from the NIH, R01 CA138678.

We appreciate Bin Zheng, Ph.D. for his critical review of the manuscript. Due to space constraints, it is impossible to reference every article in this review. We apologize for any oversights.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Gu H, Neel BG. The “Gab” in signal transduction. Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13(3):122–30. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nishida K, Hirano T. The role of Gab family scaffolding adapter proteins in the signal transduction of cytokine and growth factor receptors. Cancer Sci. 2003;94(12):1029–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01396.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wohrle FU, Daly RJ, Brummer T. Function, regulation and pathological roles of the Gab/DOS docking proteins. Cell Commun Signal. 2009;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-7-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Rohrschneider LR. The gift of Gab. FEBS Lett. 2002;515(1–3):1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02425-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarmay G, Angyal A, Kertesz A, Maus M, Medgyesi D. The multiple function of Grb2 associated binder (Gab) adaptor/scaffolding protein in immune cell signaling. Immunol Lett. 2006;104(1–2):76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gu H, Pratt JC, Burakoff SJ, Neel BG. Cloning of p97/Gab2, the major SHP2-binding protein in hematopoietic cells, reveals a novel pathway for cytokine-induced gene activation. Mol Cell. 1998;2(6):729–40. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80288-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maroun CR, Moscatello DK, Naujokas MA, Holgado-Madruga M, Wong AJ, Park M. A conserved inositol phospholipid binding site within the pleckstrin homology domain of the Gab1 docking protein is required for epithelial morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(44):31719–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.44.31719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Isakoff SJ, Cardozo T, Andreev J, Li Z, Ferguson KM, Abagyan R, et al. Identification and analysis of PH domain-containing targets of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase using a novel in vivo assay in yeast. EMBO J. 1998;17(18):5374–87. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.18.5374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lock LS, Royal I, Naujokas MA, Park M. Identification of an atypical Grb2 carboxyl-terminal SH3 domain binding site in Gab docking proteins reveals Grb2-dependent and -independent recruitment of Gab1 to receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(40):31536–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003597200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harkiolaki M, Tsirka T, Lewitzky M, Simister PC, Joshi D, Bird LE, et al. Distinct binding modes of two epitopes in Gab2 that interact with the SH3C domain of Grb2. Structure. 2009;17(6):809–22. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edmead CE, Fox BC, Stace C, Ktistakis N, Welham MJ. The pleckstrin homology domain of Gab-2 is required for optimal interleukin-3 signalsome-mediated responses. Cell Signal. 2006;18(8):1147–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leahy M, Lyons A, Krause D, O’Connor R. Impaired Shc, Ras, and MAPK activation but normal Akt activation in FL5. 12 cells expressing an insulin-like growth factor I receptor mutated at tyrosines 1250 and 1251. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(18):18306–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309234200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mao D, Epple H, Uthgenannt B, Novack DV, Faccio R. PLCgamma2 regulates osteoclastogenesis via its interaction with ITAM proteins and GAB2. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(11):2869–79. doi: 10.1172/JCI28775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brummer T, Larance M, Herrera Abreu MT, Lyons RJ, Timpson P, Emmerich CH, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent binding of 14-3-3 terminates signalling by the Gab2 docking protein. EMBO J. 2008;27(17):2305–16. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao C, Ma H, Bossy-Wetzel E, Lipton SA, Zhang Z, Feng GS. GC-GAP, a Rho family GTPase-activating protein that interacts with signaling adapters Gab1 and Gab2. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(36):34641–53. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304594200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu Y, Jenkins B, Shin JL, Rohrschneider LR. Scaffolding protein Gab2 mediates differentiation signaling downstream of Fms receptor tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(9):3047–56. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3047-3056.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leung WH, Bolland S. The inositol 5′-phosphatase SHIP-2 negatively regulates IgE-induced mast cell degranulation and cytokine production. J Immunol. 2007;179(1):95–102. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huber M, Helgason CD, Damen JE, Liu L, Humphries RK, Krystal G. The src homology 2-containing inositol phosphatase (SHIP) is the gatekeeper of mast cell degranulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(19):11330–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baychelier F, Nardeux PC, Cajean-Feroldi C, Ermonval M, Guymarho J, Tovey MG, et al. Involvement of the Gab2 scaffolding adapter in type I interferon signalling. Cell Signal. 2007;19(10):2080–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schwab M. Amplification of oncogenes in human cancer cells. Bioessays. 1998;20(6):473–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199806)20:6<473::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schuuring E, Verhoeven E, van Tinteren H, Peterse JL, Nunnink B, Thunnissen FB, et al. Amplification of genes within the chromosome 11q13 region is indicative of poor prognosis in patients with operable breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1992;52(19):5229–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sauter ER, Yeo UC, von Stemm A, Zhu W, Litwin S, Tichansky DS, et al. Cyclin D1 is a candidate oncogene in cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62(11):3200–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brown LA, Kalloger SE, Miller MA, Shih Ie M, McKinney SE, Santos JL, et al. Amplification of 11q13 in ovarian carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47(6):481–9. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bentires-Alj M, Gil SG, Chan R, Wang ZC, Wang Y, Imanaka N, et al. Arole for the scaffolding adapter GAB2 in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2006;12(1):114–21. doi: 10.1038/nm1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bocanegra M, Bergamaschi A, Kim YH, Miller MA, Rajput AB, Kao J, et al. Focal amplification and oncogene dependency of GAB2 in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29(5):774–9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zatkova A, Schoch C, Speleman F, Poppe B, Mannhalter C, Fonatsch C, et al. GAB2 is a novel target of 11q amplification in AML/MDS. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006;45(9):798–807. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Horst B, Gruvberger-Saal SK, Hopkins BD, Bordone L, Yang Y, Chernoff KA, et al. Gab2-mediated signaling promotes melanoma metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2009;174(4):1524–33. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bekri S, Adelaide J, Merscher S, Grosgeorge J, Caroli-Bosc F, Perucca-Lostanlen D, et al. Detailed map of a region commonly amplified at 11q13-->q14 in human breast carcinoma. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1997;79(1–2):125–31. doi: 10.1159/000134699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daly RJ, Gu H, Parmar J, Malaney S, Lyons RJ, Kairouz R, et al. The docking protein Gab2 is overexpressed and estrogen regulated in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21(33):5175–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fleuren ED, O’Toole S, Millar EK, McNeil C, Lopez-Knowles E, Boulghourjian A, et al. Overexpression of the oncogenic signal transducer Gab2 occurs early in breast cancer development. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(6):1486–92. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brummer T, Schramek D, Hayes VM, Bennett HL, Caldon CE, Musgrove EA, et al. Increased proliferation and altered growth factor dependence of human mammary epithelial cells overexpressing the Gab2 docking protein. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(1):626–37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509567200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ke Y, Wu D, Princen F, Nguyen T, Pang Y, Lesperance J, et al. Role of Gab2 in mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis. Oncogene. 2007 doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kong M, Mounier C, Dumas V, Posner BI. Epidermal growth factor-induced DNA synthesis. Key role for Src phosphorylation of the docking protein Gab2. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(8):5837–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208286200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bennett HL, Brummer T, Jeanes A, Yap AS, Daly RJ. Gab2 and Src co-operate in human mammary epithelial cells to promote growth factor independence and disruption of acinar morphogenesis. Oncogene. 2008;27(19):2693–704. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reynolds AB, Vila J, Lansing TJ, Potts WM, Weber MJ, Parsons JT. Activation of the oncogenic potential of the avian cellular src protein by specific structural alteration of the carboxy terminus. EMBO J. 1987;6(8):2359–64. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02512.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Frame MC. Newest findings on the oldest oncogene; how activated src does it. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 7):989–98. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mira A, Isella C, Renzulli T, Cantarella D, Martelli ML, Medico E. The GAB2 signaling scaffold promotes anchorage independence and drives a transcriptional response associated with metastatic progression of breast cancer. Oncogene. 2009;28(50):4444–55. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Herrera Abreu MT, Hughes WE, Mele K, Lyons RJ, Rickwood D, Browne BC, et al. Gab2 regulates cytoskeletal organization and migration of mammary epithelial cells by modulating RhoA activation. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(1):105–16. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qian P, Zuo Z, Wu Z, Meng X, Li G, Zhang W, et al. Pivotal role of reduced let-7g expression in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71(20):6463–74. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gu H, Saito K, Klaman LD, Shen J, Fleming T, Wang Y, et al. Essential role for Gab2 in the allergic response. Nature. 2001;412(6843):186–90. doi: 10.1038/35084076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wada T, Nakashima T, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, Gasser J, Hara H, Schett G, et al. The molecular scaffold Gab2 is a crucial component of RANK signaling and osteoclastogenesis. Nat Med. 2005;11(4):394–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang Y, Diaz-Flores E, Li G, Wang Z, Kang Z, Haviernikova E, et al. Abnormal hematopoiesis in Gab2 mutant mice. Blood. 2007;110(1):116–24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-060707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee AW, Mao Y, Penninger JM, Yu S. Gab2 promotes colony-stimulating factor 1-regulated macrophage expansion via alternate effectors at different stages of development. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(22):4563–81. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05706-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ben-Neriah Y, Daley GQ, Mes-Masson AM, Witte ON, Baltimore D. The chronic myelogenous leukemia-specific P210 protein is the product of the bcr/abl hybrid gene. Science. 1986;233(4760):212–4. doi: 10.1126/science.3460176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sattler M, Mohi MG, Pride YB, Quinnan LR, Malouf NA, Podar K, et al. Critical role for Gab2 in transformation by BCR/ABL. Cancer Cell. 2002;1(5):479–92. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00074-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Scherr M, Chaturvedi A, Battmer K, Dallmann I, Schultheis B, Ganser A, et al. Enhanced sensitivity to inhibition of SHP2, STAT5, and Gab2 expression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Blood. 2006;107(8):3279–87. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Million RP, Harakawa N, Roumiantsev S, Varticovski L, Van Etten RA. A direct binding site for Grb2 contributes to transformation and leukemogenesis by the Tel-Abl (ETV6-Abl) tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(11):4685–95. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4685-4695.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nguyen MH, Ho JM, Beattie BK, Barber DL. TEL-JAK2 mediates constitutive activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/protein kinase B signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(35):32704–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Voena C, Conte C, Ambrogio C, Boeri Erba E, Boccalatte F, Mohammed S, et al. The tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 interacts with NPM-ALK and regulates anaplastic lymphoma cell growth and migration. Cancer Res. 2007;67(9):4278–86. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Roumiantsev S, Krause DS, Neumann CA, Dimitri CA, Asiedu F, Cross NC, et al. Distinct stem cell myeloproliferative/T lymphoma syndromes induced by ZNF198-FGFR1 and BCR-FGFR1 fusion genes from 8p11 translocations. Cancer Cell. 2004;5(3):287–98. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00053-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Teal HE, Ni S, Xu J, Finkelstein LD, Cheng AM, Paulson RF, et al. GRB2-mediated recruitment of GAB2, but not GAB1, to SF-STK supports the expansion of Friend virus-infected erythroid progenitor cells. Oncogene. 2006;25(17):2433–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu J, Meng F, Lu H, Kong L, Bornmann W, Peng Z, et al. Lyn regulates BCR-ABL and Gab2 tyrosine phosphorylation and c-Cbl protein stability in imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood. 2008;111(7):3821–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-109330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li G, Wang Z, Miskimen KL, Zhang Y, Tse W, Bunting KD. Gab2 promotes hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and self-renewal synergistically with STAT5. PLoS One. 5(2):e9152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Harir N, Pecquet C, Kerenyi M, Sonneck K, Kovacic B, Nyga R, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat5 promotes its cytoplasmic localization and association with PI3-kinase in myeloid leukemias. Blood. 2007;109(4):1678–86. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-029918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lauchle JO, Braun BS, Loh ML, Shannon K. Inherited predispositions and hyperactive Ras in myeloid leukemogenesis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(5):579–85. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mohi MG, Williams IR, Dearolf CR, Chan G, Kutok JL, Cohen S, et al. Prognostic, therapeutic, and mechanistic implications of a mouse model of leukemia evoked by Shp2 (PTPN11) mutations. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(2):179–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xu D, Wang S, Yu WM, Chan G, Araki T, Bunting KD, et al. A gain-of-function mutation in Ptpn11 (Shp-2) phosphatase induces myeloproliferative disease by aberrant activation of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-265652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yajima I, Kumasaka MY, Thang ND, Goto Y, Takeda K, Yamanoshita O, et al. RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT Signaling in Malignant Melanoma Progression and Therapy. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:354191. doi: 10.1155/2012/354191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Abrams SL, Lee JT, Chang F, Bertrand FE, et al. Roles of the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathways in malignant transformation and drug resistance. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2006;46:249–79. doi: 10.1016/j.advenzreg.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang Y, Wu J, Demir A, Castillo-Martin M, Melamed RD, Zhang G, et al. GAB2 induces tumor angiogenesis in NRAS-driven melanoma. Oncogene. 2011 doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.367. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang Y, Sheng Q, Spillman MA, Behbakht K, Gu H. Gab2 regulates the migratory behaviors and E-cadherin expression via activation of the PI3K pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene. 2012;31(20):2512–20. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES