Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Oct 15;93(21):11609–11614. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11609

Intrinsic compressibility and volume compression in solvated proteins by molecular dynamics simulation at high pressure.

E Paci 1, M Marchi 1
PMCID: PMC38105  PMID: 8876183

Abstract

Constant pressure and temperature molecular dynamics techniques have been employed to investigate the changes in structure and volumes of two globular proteins, superoxide dismutase and lysozyme, under pressure. Compression (the relative changes in the proteins' volumes), computed with the Voronoi technique, is closely related with the so-called protein intrinsic compressibility, estimated by sound velocity measurements. In particular, compression computed with Voronoi volumes predicts, in agreement with experimental estimates, a negative bound water contribution to the apparent protein compression. While the use of van der Waals and molecular volumes underestimates the intrinsic compressibilities of proteins, Voronoi volumes produce results closer to experimental estimates. Remarkably, for two globular proteins of very different secondary structures, we compute identical (within statistical error) protein intrinsic compressions, as predicted by recent experimental studies. Changes in the protein interatomic distances under compression are also investigated. It is found that, on average, short distances compress less than longer ones. This nonuniform contraction underlines the peculiar nature of the structural changes due to pressure in contrast with temperature effects, which instead produce spatially uniform changes in proteins. The structural effects observed in the simulations at high pressure can explain protein compressibility measurements carried out by fluorimetric and hole burning techniques. Finally, the calculation of the proteins static structure factor shows significant shifts in the peaks at short wavenumber as pressure changes. These effects might provide an alternative way to obtain information concerning compressibilities of selected protein regions.

Full text

PDF
11609

Images in this article

11612Fig. 2
on p.11612

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bellissent-Funel M. C., Lal J., Bradley K. F., Chen S. H. Neutron structure factors of in-vivo deuterated amorphous protein C-phycocyanin. Biophys J. 1993 May;64(5):1542–1549. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81523-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandts J. F., Oliveira R. J., Westort C. Thermodynamics of protein denaturation. Effect of pressu on the denaturation of ribonuclease A. Biochemistry. 1970 Feb 17;9(4):1038–1047. doi: 10.1021/bi00806a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunne R. M., van Gunsteren W. F. Dynamical properties of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor from a molecular dynamics simulation at 5000 atm. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jun 1;323(3):215–217. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81342-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper A. Protein fluctuations and the thermodynamic uncertainty principle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1984;44(3):181–214. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(84)90008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper A. Thermodynamic fluctuations in protein molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2740–2741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frauenfelder H., Hartmann H., Karplus M., Kuntz I. D., Jr, Kuriyan J., Parak F., Petsko G. A., Ringe D., Tilton R. F., Jr, Connolly M. L. Thermal expansion of a protein. Biochemistry. 1987 Jan 13;26(1):254–261. doi: 10.1021/bi00375a035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gavish B., Gratton E., Hardy C. J. Adiabatic compressibility of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(3):750–754. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.3.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gekko K., Hasegawa Y. Compressibility-structure relationship of globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1986 Oct 21;25(21):6563–6571. doi: 10.1021/bi00369a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gross M., Jaenicke R. Proteins under pressure. The influence of high hydrostatic pressure on structure, function and assembly of proteins and protein complexes. Eur J Biochem. 1994 Apr 15;221(2):617–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harpaz Y., Gerstein M., Chothia C. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure. 1994 Jul 15;2(7):641–649. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Henderson S. J. Monte Carlo modeling of small-angle scattering data from non-interacting homogeneous and heterogeneous particles in solution. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1618–1627. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79725-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jonas J., Jonas A. High-pressure NMR spectroscopy of proteins and membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:287–318. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kharakoz D. P., Sarvazyan A. P. Hydrational and intrinsic compressibilities of globular proteins. Biopolymers. 1993 Jan;33(1):11–26. doi: 10.1002/bip.360330103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kitchen D. B., Reed L. H., Levy R. M. Molecular dynamics simulation of solvated protein at high pressure. Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 20;31(41):10083–10093. doi: 10.1021/bi00156a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kundrot C. E., Richards F. M. Crystal structure of hen egg-white lysozyme at a hydrostatic pressure of 1000 atmospheres. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jan 5;193(1):157–170. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90634-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marden M. C., Hui Bon Hoa G., Stetzkowski-Marden F. Heme protein fluorescence versus pressure. Biophys J. 1986 Mar;49(3):619–627. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83689-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCammon J. A., Wolynes P. G., Karplus M. Picosecond dynamics of tyrosine side chains in proteins. Biochemistry. 1979 Mar 20;18(6):927–942. doi: 10.1021/bi00573a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peng X., Jonas J., Silva J. L. High-pressure NMR study of the dissociation of Arc repressor. Biochemistry. 1994 Jul 12;33(27):8323–8329. doi: 10.1021/bi00193a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jan 5;82(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90570-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Samarasinghe S. D., Campbell D. M., Jonas A., Jonas J. High-resolution NMR study of the pressure-induced unfolding of lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 1;31(34):7773–7778. doi: 10.1021/bi00149a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Silva J. L., Weber G. Pressure stability of proteins. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1993;44:89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.44.100193.000513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Squire P. G., Himmel M. E. Hydrodynamics and protein hydration. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1979 Aug;196(1):165–177. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(79)90563-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES