Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2013 Oct;19(10):1627–1629. doi: 10.3201/eid1910.130376

Rickettsia slovaca Infection in Humans, Portugal

Rita de Sousa 1,2,, Branca Isabel Pereira 1,2, Claúdia Nazareth 1,2, Susana Cabral 1,2, Conceição Ventura 1,2, Pedro Crespo 1,2, Nuno Marques 1,2, Saraiva da Cunha 1,2
PMCID: PMC3810745  PMID: 24050379

Abstract

Fifteen years after the initial detection of Rickettsia slovaca in ticks in Portugal, 3 autochthonous cases of R. slovaca infection were diagnosed in humans. All patients had an eschar on the scalp and lymphadenopathy; 2 patients had facial edema. R. slovaca infection was confirmed by serologic testing, culture, and PCR.

Keywords: TIBOLA, tick-borne lymphadenopathy, Dermacentor-borne-necrosis-erythema lymphadenopathy, DEBONEL, Rickettsia slovaca, lymphadenopathy, facial edema, Portugal, rickettsiae, rickettsial infections, vector-borne infections, scalp eschar

Keywords: Suggested citation for this article: de Sousa R, Pereira BI, Nazareth C, Cabral S, Ventura C, Crespo P, et al. Rickettsia slovaca infection in humans, Portugal. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013 Oct [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1910.130376


Rickettsia slovaca is a pathogenic, tick-borne, spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae that was initially isolated in 1968 from a Dermacentor marginatus tick in Slovakia. R. slovaca infection has been described in humans from several countries (1,2), but a laboratory-confirmed case of R. slovaca infection was first reported in a patient in France in 1997 (3). R. slovaca has since been reported in humans in France, Spain, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Italy, and Germany (47).

The analysis of a large series of patients reporting the common clinical signs of enlarged regional lymph nodes associated with the tick bite led to the names that have been used to designate this rickettsial disease, tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA) and Dermacentor-borne-necrosis-erythema lymphadenopathy (8,9). Apart from Mediterranean spotted fever, TIBOLA may be among the most prevalent tick-borne rickettsioses in Europe (4).

In Portugal, R. slovaca was initially described in 1995 in D. marginatus ticks and later in D. reticulatus ticks (10,11) but has not been identified in humans. We report 3 laboratory-confirmed cases of R. slovaca infection in human patients in Portugal.

The Study

During October 2010–May 2012, three Caucasian women who sought care at the emergency department of University Hospitals of Coimbra (HUC), Coimbra, Portugal, were admitted with clinical signs and symptoms compatible with a rickettsiosis. The patients were residents of rural areas of the Coimbra district, and all were at risk for tick exposure through fieldwork or direct contact with domestic animals (Table). Two patients reported that they had removed a tick from the scalp.

Table. Epidemiologic, clinical and microbiologic characteristics of 3 patients infected with Rickettsia slovaca, Portugal.

Characteristic Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
Epidemiologic
Age, y/sex 50/F 53/F 30/F
Date of illness onset 2010 Oct 2012 Apr 2012 May
Type of residence Rural Rural Rural
At-risk activity Field worker Field worker, contact with domestic animals Contact with dogs
Reported tick bite
Yes
Yes
NA
Clinical characteristics
Incubation time, d*† 4 7 NA
Fever Yes, 37.8°C No No
Eschar on scalp Yes Yes Yes
Rash No Yes, maculopapular No
Painful cervical/occipital lymphadenopathy Yes No Yes
Facial edema Yes Yes No
Headache Yes No No
Localized alopecia
No
Yes
No
Laboratory diagnostics
Antibodies against R. slovaca by IFA‡
Sample 1, titer IgM/IgG Negative 32/64 32/64
Sample 2, titer IgM/IgG 32/128 1,024/1,024 ND
Culture from eschar Positive ND Contaminated
PCR from eschar Positive Positive Positive

*All patients were treated with doxycycline. NA, not available; ND, not done; IFA, immunofluorescence assay.
†From tick bite to symptom onset.
‡Positive cutoff values, IgM = 32; IgG = 128.

Physical examination showed a single inoculation eschar surrounded by an erythematous halo on the scalps of all 3 patients; 1 patient later had alopecia develop at the tick bite site (Table; Figure 1). Two patients also had painful cervical and occipital lymphoadenopathies, accompanied by unilateral or bilateral peri-orbital edema (Table; Figure 2). Fever (37.8°C) and a maculopapular rash in the trunk and upper limbs were each visible and reported in 1 patient.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Inoculation eschar surrounded by an erythematous halo at the site of a tick bite on the scalp of a female patient in Portugal. Tick-borne lymphoadenopathy caused by Rickettsia slovaca infection was later confirmed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Left peri-orbital edema in a female patient in Portugal. Tick-borne lymphoadenopathy caused by Rickettsia slovaca infection was later confirmed.

Laboratory testing showed a slight increase of C-reactive protein in 2 patients and a mild thrombocytopenia in 1, but other results were within normal limits. The patients were treated with doxycycline (200 mg/d) for 7 days with progressive resolution of the clinical signs (e.g., edema, rash).

To confirm the diagnosis of R. slovaca infection, serum samples and skin biopsy specimens collected at different times of infection from all patients (Table) were sent to the Portuguese reference laboratory for rickettsioses. Serologic response was analyzed by in-house immunofluorescence assay using R. slovaca PoTi443 strain as antigen, as described (12). Seroconversion in 2 consecutive samples was demonstrated in patients 1 and 2 by the appearance or increasing levels of IgM and IgG against rickettsiae (Table). Patient 3 had only 1 acute serum sample; test results showed titers for IgM were 32 and for IgG were 64.

Molecular detection of rickettsial DNA on eschar biopsies was performed by PCR, as described (13). Briefly, DNA was extracted from each skin biopsy sample by using a DNeasy Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Nested PCR amplification targeting ompA (190-kDa protein) and citrate synthase (gltA) fragment genes of Rickettsia spp. and sequencing of positive products were done as described (13). The sequences were edited by using Lasergene software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). BLAST analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) showed 100% homology with gltA (382/382 bp) and ompA (323/323 bp) of R. slovaca isolate PoTi443 (GenBank accession nos. HM149281 and HM149286), which was detected in D. marginatus ticks in Portugal (11).

Skin samples from patients 1 and 3 were used for rickettsial isolation attempts by using Vero E6 cell line and shell-vial technique as described (14). (The sample from patient 2 was too small to use for both tests.) After 8 days’ incubation at 32°C, growth of Rickettsia spp. was detected and visualized by Gimenez staining and imunofluorescence assay. Positive culture was confirmed for patient 1; however, the culture from patient 3 was contaminated. The Rickettsia spp. isolate was characterized by PCR and sequencing as described above for molecular detection. This analysis provided definitive confirmation of the isolate as R. slovaca.

Conclusions

We report 3 confirmed cases of TIBOLA in Portuguese patients, an indication of the emergence of this rickettsial disease in Portugal. The patients were all women, which is in accordance with previous findings of a higher risk for infection for women and children (4). Our patients also each showed a tick bite on the scalp associated with the enlargement of lymph nodes, as described in other clinical reports (3,47,9,15).

Two (67%) of the patients we describe showed facial edema, which is notably higher than Parola et al. reported in his series of patients, where facial edema occurred in 6 (19%) of 49 patients (15). Although our number of patients was very small, this sign, associated with the eschar on the scalps of patients 1 and 2, is what led clinicians to further investigate which species of Rickettsia was involved in these infections. One of the patients showed residual alopecia, but no patients reported persistent fatigue; these have been described in other patients as frequent complaints in the convalescent stage of disease (3,5). Low-grade fever (37.8°C) and maculopapular rash each occurred in 1 patient, similar to rates in previous reports for fever (12%–67%) and rash (14%–23%) (3,4,15).

Aside from the typical manifestations of TIBOLA in these patients, isolation and PCR detection followed by genetic characterization of isolates were essential to confirm R. slovaca infection. Although the patients showed detectable antibodies against R. slovaca, diagnosis on the basis of serologic results only does not distinguish among various SFG rickettsiae, and in Portugal, different Rickettsia spp. can circulate during the same time of year (13,14). The onset of symptoms (media incubation time 5.5 days) in these patients was in October, April, and May, timing that is associated with seasonal activity of Dermacentor spp. ticks. Prevalence rates of R. slovaca in these ticks in Europe range from 21% in Hungary to 40.6% in Spain and 41.5% in Portugal (11). Based on the similar prevalence of R. slovaca in ticks in Portugal and Spain, and in comparison with the large number of patients in Spain with R. slovaca infection, it is possible that cases of R. slovaca infection in Portugal are not being recognized by clinicians or are being misdiagnosed as Mediterranean spotted fever.

Although R. slovaca is the main etiologic agent associated with TIBOLA, recent studies have indicated that patients with the same characteristic clinical signs may be infected with other Rickettsia species, such as R. rioja or R. raoultii (4,11), which are also transmitted by Dermacentor spp. ticks. Oteo et al. reported that, in Spain, R. rioja was the causative agent for almost half of patients with TIBOLA (4). In Portugal, a high prevalence (58.5%) of R. raoultii has found in Dermacentor spp., but this rickettsial species has not been detected in humans (11). Because clinical signs can overlap in different rickettsial infections and serologic testing cannot distinguish among SFG rickettsiae, molecular characterization is essential to clarifying the epidemiology of these rickettsial infections.

Biography

Dr de Sousa is a microbiologist at the Center for Vector and Infectious Diseases Dr. Francisco Cambournac at National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge. Her research interest is infectious diseases and public health, particularly related to rickettsial diseases.

References

  • 1.Rehacek J. Rickettsia slovaca, the organism and its ecology. Acta Scient Nat Acad Sci Bohemoslovacae Brno. 1984;18:1–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mittermayer T, Brezina R, Urvolgyi J. First report of an infection with Rickettsia slovaca. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1980;27:373–6 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Raoult D, Berbis P, Roux V, Xu W, Maurin M. A new tick-transmitted disease due to Rickettsia slovaca. Lancet. 1997;350:112–3 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61814-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oteo JA, Portillo A. Tick-borne rickettsioses in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3:271–8.http:// [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Selmi M, Bertolotti L, Tomassone L, Mannelli A. Rickettsia slovaca in Dermacentor marginatus and tick-borne lymphadenopathy, Tuscany, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:817–20 . 10.3201/eid1405.070976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Komitova R, Lakos A, Aleksandrov A, Christova I, Murdjeva M. A case of tick-transmitted lymphadenopathy in Bulgaria associated with Rickettsia slovaca. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35:213 . 10.1080/0036554021000027016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rieg S, Schmoldt S, Theilacker C, de With K, Wölfel S, Kern WV, et al. Tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA) acquired in southwestern Germany. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:167 . 10.1186/1471-2334-11-167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lakos A. Tick-borne lymphadenopathy—a new rickettsial disease? Lancet. 1997;350:1006 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64072-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oteo JA, Ibarra V, Blanco JR, Martínez de Artola V, Márquez FJ, Portillo A, et al. Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema and lymphadenopathy: clinical and epidemiological features of a new tick- borne disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:327–31. 10.1111/j.1198-743X.2004.00782.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bacellar F, Núncio MS, Alves MJ, Filipe AR. Rickettsia slovaca: un agente del grupo de las fiebres exantemáticas, en Portugal. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1995;13:218–23 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Milhano N, de Carvalho IL, Alves AS, Arroube S, Soares J, Rodriguez P, et al. Coinfections of Rickettsia slovaca and Rickettsia helvetica with Borrelia lusitaniae in ticks collected in a Safari Park, Portugal. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2010;1:172–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.de Sousa R, Duque L, Anes M, Poças J, Torgal J, Bacellar F, et al. Lymphangitis in a Portuguese patient infected with Rickettsia sibirica [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:529–30 . 10.3201/eid1403.070680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Sousa R, Ismail N, Dória-Nóbrega S, Costa P, Abreu T, França A, et al. The presence of eschars, but not greater severity, in Portuguese patients infected with Israeli spotted fever. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1063:197–202. 10.1196/annals.1355.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Sousa R, Barata C, Vitorino L, Santos-Silva M, Carrapato C, Torgal J. Rickettsia sibirica isolation from a patient and detection in ticks, Portugal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1103–8. 10.3201/eid1207.051494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parola P, Rovery C, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Rickettsia slovaca and R. raoultii in tick-borne rickettsioses. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1105–8. 10.3201/eid1507.081449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES