Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2013 Sep;19(9):1507–1515. doi: 10.3201/eid1909.130077

Serogroup W135 Meningococcal Disease, The Gambia, 2012

M Jahangir Hossain 1,2,3,, Anna Roca 1,2,3, Grant A Mackenzie 1,2,3, Momodou Jasseh 1,2,3, Mohammad Ilias Hossain 1,2,3, Shah Muhammad 1,2,3, Manjang Ahmed 1,2,3, Osuorah Donatus Chidiebere 1,2,3, Ndiaye Malick 1,2,3, SM Bilquees 1,2,3, Usman N Ikumapayi 1,2,3, Baba Jeng 1,2,3, Baba Njie 1,2,3, Mamady Cham 1,2,3, Beate Kampmann 1,2,3, Tumani Corrah 1,2,3, Stephen Howie 1,2,3, Umberto D’Alessandro 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3810914  PMID: 23965435

Abstract

In 2012, an outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135 occurred in The Gambia. The attack rate was highest among young children. The associated risk factors were male sex, contact with meningitis patients, and difficult breathing. Enhanced surveillance facilitates early epidemic detection, and multiserogroup conjugate vaccine could reduce meningococcal epidemics in The Gambia.

Keywords: Neisseria meningitidis, serogroup W135, meningitis, the Gambia, epidemic, outbreak, bacteria


Meningococcal disease is endemic to the African “meningitis belt”; outbreaks occur regularly (1,2). Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A causes most (80%) cases. However, during 2002–2003, serogroup W135 caused a major epidemic in Burkina Faso (attack rate [AR] 251 cases/100,000 population) (3). Thereafter, the incidence of serogroup W135 was low, with isolated cases and a small-scale outbreak in the meningitis belt (4,5). In 2010, serogroup A conjugate vaccine was introduced into the African meningitis belt and substantially reduced the incidence of meningitis (6).

In The Gambia, only 6 serogroup W135 cases were identified during 1990–1995; the most recent case had been reported in 1995 (7). In 2012, a large epidemic of serogroup W135 occurred throughout the meningitis belt, including The Gambia (1). Most risk factors identified in the meningitis belt concern serogroup A (8,9), and risk factors for serogroup W135 are little studied. Therefore, we report the investigation of this epidemic and the related risk factors.

The Study

The Gambian Ministry of Health and the Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia, investigated a serogroup W135 epidemic that occurred during February–June 2012 in the Central River Region (CRR) and Upper River Region (URR). Since 2008, surveillance of invasive bacterial diseases has been ongoing in Bansang Hospital in CRR and Basse Health Centre in URR (10). The peripheral health centers refer severely ill patients to these health facilities. Three approaches were used to recruit persons with suspected cases of serogroup W135: enhanced prospective surveillance in Bansang Hospital and Basse Health Centre, retrospective case identification from hospital records, and visits to households with confirmed case-patients serogroup W135 to identify other suspected cases. A suspected case was defined as a history of acute onset of fever and any of the following: altered consciousness, inability to eat, neck stiffness, seizures, petechial rash, or bulging anterior fontanel in a child <2 years of age. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or blood samples were collected from hospitalized persons with suspected serogroup W135. A confirmed case was a suspected case in which serogroup W135 was identified by culture and/or an antigen-specific test. The alert threshold was defined as >5 meningitis cases per 100,000 persons per week; the epidemic threshold was >10 cases (11).

The investigation team administered 1 dose of ciprofloxacin to each close contact of confirmed case-patients and provided health information to raise awareness. At the end of the epidemic, The Gambian government deployed the tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine.

CSF and blood samples were cultured for bacteria in BACTEC Medium (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and tested for serogrouping by latex agglutination by using BACTEC and Ramel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) test kits. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility was tested.

We conducted a matched case–control (ratio 1:1) study to identify risk factors. Healthy controls were matched by age and village with confirmed case-patients, including those who died. Demographic, socioeconomic, and exposure (within 14 days before illness onset) data were collected by using a structured questionnaire. Risk factors were analyzed by conducting bivariate matched and multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses. The Joint Gambia Government/Medical Research Council Ethics Committee approved the study. All study participants or legal guardians provided written informed consent.

During February 1–June 25, 2012, a total of 469 suspected cases were identified, and 114 were confirmed to be serogroup W135. Thirty-one were co-primary or secondary cases in confirmed case-patients’ households. Most (67%) suspected case-patients were <5 years of age, and 56% of cases occurred in male patients. The overall case-fatality rate was 8%.

The overall AR was 111 cases per 100,000 persons but was much higher among younger children (Table 1). The epidemic threshold was exceeded in the last week of February and continued until April for persons of all ages and until June for children <5 years of age (Figure 1, panels A, B). Among children <5 years of age, the peak AR attained 83 and 47 cases per 100,000 persons per week in CRR and URR, respectively (Figure 1, panel B). The epidemic peaked during the high temperature/driest months (March–May) and ended abruptly after the first rainfalls in June (Figure 2).

Table 1. Confirmed and suspected cases of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135, CRR and URR, The Gambia, February 1–June 25, 2012*.

Health region/case-patient age group, y Cases, no. (%) Deaths, no. (%) 2011 population† Cases/100,000 population
CRR
<1 62 (20) 8 (13) 4,216 1,470
1–4 138 (45) 4 (3) 29,470 468
5–14 70 (23) 2 (3) 66,545 105
>15 37 (12) 4 (11) 115,995 32
Total 307 (100) 18 (6) 216,227 142
URR
<1 47 (29) 10 (21) 4,086 1,150
1–4 70 (43) 5 (7) 27,564 254
5–14 36 (22) 2 (6) 64,014 56
>15 9 (6) 1 (11) 111,663 8
Total 162 (100) 18 (11) 207,327 78
CRR and URR
<1 109 (23) 18 8,302 1,312
1–4 208 (44) 9 57,034 364
5–14 106 (23) 4 (4) 130,560 81
>15 46 (10) 5 (11) 227,658 20
Total 469 (100) 36 (8) 423,554 111

*CRR, Central River Region; URR, Upper River Region.
†Estimated on the basis of 2003 census.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135, Central River and Upper River Regions, The Gambia, February 1–June 25, 2012. A) Attack rate per 100,000 persons per week. B) Attack rate per 100,000 children <5 years of age per week. Light gray bars, Central River Region; dark gray bars, Upper River Region. Alert threshold corresponds to an attack rate of 5; epidemic threshold, to an attack rate of 10.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Number of epidemic cases of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135 in relation to time, temperature, humidity, and rainfall, Central River Region, The Gambia, February 1–June 25, 2012. Blue line, maximum temperature; red line, minimum temperature; green line, humidity; blue bars, total number of cases.

The most common signs and symptoms among the 113 confirmed serogroup W135 case-patients were weakness (96%), irritability (88%), neck stiffness (81%), and inability to eat (80%). Bulging fontanelle (74%), altered mental status (73%), and seizures (65%) occurred in a slightly lower proportion of case-patients.

Blood and/or CSF samples were collected from 301 (69%) of 438 hospitalized suspected case-patients, of which almost half (138) were positive for bacterial pathogens. Serogroup W135 was the major pathogen (114 [83%] of 138); followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (13%) and Staphylococcus aureus (2%). Common antibacterial drugs used for meningitis were tested on 92 (81%) serogroup W135 isolates, which were susceptible to most of them (ampicillin, 100%; chloramphenicol, 99%; ciprofloxacin, 99%; penicillin, 95%; and tetracycline, 92%) but not to erythromycin (59% susceptible) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (100% resistant).

We enrolled 106 confirmed case–control pairs. Risk factors identified in the univariate analysis were male sex, students, >4 children 1–5 years of age in the household, contact with a meningitis case-patient, preceding history of respiratory illness (nasal discharge, difficult breathing), and itchy eyes (Table 2, Appendix). In the multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; 95% CI 1.0–3.7), contact with meningitis case-patients (OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.3–17.8), difficult breathing (OR 6.8; 95% CI 1.4–33.4), and itchy eyes (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.3–14.4) remained significantly associated with cases.

Table 2. Matched univariate analysis for risk factors for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135 during an outbreak, Central River Region and Upper River Region, The Gambia, February 1–June 25, 2012.

Characteristic Cases no. (%), n = 106 Controls, no. (%), n = 106 Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Demographic
Mean age (±SD), y 4 (3.9) 3.9 (3.7) 0.876*
Male sex 66 (62) 53 (50) 1.7 (0.96–3.1) 0.067
Ethnic group
Mandinka 33 (31) 31 (29) Ref
Sarahule 13 (12) 13 (12) 0.80 (0.5–13.7) 0.881
Fula 44 (42) 39 (37) 0.64 (0.2–1.9) 0.421
Wollof 17 (16) 20 (19) 1.6 (0.3–7.7) 0.567
Other
1 (01)
1 (1)
1.0 (0.1–21.5)
0.993
Socioeconomic
Occupation: student 22 (21) 14 (13) 5.0 (1.1–22.8) 0.038
Mean age of student (±SD), y 9.8 (4.7) 9.6 (3.9) 0.897*
Primary caretaker: mother 92 (87) 95 (90) 0.8 (0.3–1.8) 0.523
Occupation: farming 66 (62 68 (64) 0.9 (0.5–1.7) 0.73
Formal schooling: none 90 (85) 83 (78) 1.5 (0.8–3.1) 0.227
Housing
Floor earth or sand 42 (40) 42 (40) 1.0 (0.5–1.9) 0.769
Roof with thatched 36 (34) 46 (43) 0.57 (0.3–1.1) 0.158
Wall with mud 68 (64) 74 (70) 0.63 (0.3–1.4) 0.381
Household item
Television 22 (21) 20 (19) 1.2 (0.5–2.5) 0.695
Bicycle 82 (77) 78 (74) 1.3 (0.6–2.6) 0.481
Tube well for drinking water 34 (32) 31 (29) 1.5 (0.5–4.2) 0.442
Traditional pit latrine
98 (92)
98 (92)
1.0 (0.3–3.1)
1.0
Travel within 14 d before illness onset
Hospital or health center 19 (18) 23 (22) 0.76 (0.37–1.6) 0.467
Outside the village 24 (22) 23 (22) 1.06 (0.55–2.1) 0.866
Festival
21 (20)
18 (17)
1.2 (0.60–2.4)
0.602
Household crowding
>1 household in participant’s compound 39 (37) 40 (37) 1.05 (0.57–1.9) 0.876
Household member
Median (interquartile range) 20 (5–79) 18 (4–51) 0.412
>20 persons in household 50 (47) 40 (38) 1.7 (0.88–3.3) 0.109
Household member by age
>1 children >1 y 72 (68) 66 (62) 1.3 (0.72–2.5) 0.356
>4 children 1–5 y 59 (56) 48 (45) 2.1 (1.1–4.1) 0.037
<5 persons in sleeping room 25 (24) 25 (24) 1.0 (0.46–2.2) 1.00
>1 window in sleeping room 74 (70) 64 (60) 0.44 (0.19–1.0) 0.056
>3 persons sharing same room 68 (64) 64 (60) 1.2 (0.67–2.0) 0.572
>1 person sharing same bed
99 (93)
103 (97)
0.33 (0.07–1.6)
0.178
Social crowding in 14 d before illness onset
Traveled in public transport in a week >1 d 8 (8) 15 (14) 0.54 (0.21–1.4) 0.187
Attended gathering larger than the no. persons living in participant’s compound 37 (32) 32 (30) 1.1 (0.59–2.1) 0.746
Attended school
20 (19)
14 (13)
2.5 (0.78–8.0)
0.103
Concurrent or recent respiratory or other illness within 14 d before illness onset
Cough 43 (41) 41 (39) 1.1 (0.59–2.1) 0.746
Nasal discharge 50 (47) 30 (28) 3.0 (1.5–6.1) 0.003
Sore throat 11 (11) 6 (6) 2.0 (0.68–5.9) 0.206
Difficult breathing 17 (16) 5 (5) 7.0 (1.6–30.8) 0.010
Itchy eyes 18 (17) 4 (4) 4.5 (1.5–13.3) 0.007
Itchy nose 10 (10) 3 (3) 3.3 (0.91–12.1) 0.067
Itchy throat 4 (4) 3 (3) 1.3 (0.03–5.9) 0.706
Ear infection 9 (9) 6 (6) 1.6 (0.52–4.9) 0.410
Diarrhea 36 (34) 27 (26) 1.8 (0.86–3.6) 0.122
Symptoms of respiratory infection (cough, nasal discharge or difficult breathing)
61 (58)
53 (50)
1.5 (0.80–2.8)
0.209
Contact with patients who have symptoms of meningoencephalitis within 14 d before illness onset
Knew any person with fever with convulsion, altered mental status or unconsciousness 22 (21) 18 (17) 1.4 (0.62–3.2) 0.416
Contact (within 1 m) with any person with symptoms of meningoencephalitis 15 (15) 6 (6) 4.0 (1.1–14.1) 0.032
Site of contact
No contact 91 (86) 100 (94) 1
Contact outside compound 8 (8) 4 (4) 2.9 (0.70–12.4) 0.142
Contact in household and compound
7 (7)
1 (2)
7.4 (0.84–65.0)
0.072
Exposure to smoke within 14 d before illness onset
Any person smoked cigarette or other tobacco products in household 58 (55) 57 (54) 1.04 (0.58–1.9) 0.882
Kitchen inside living room or veranda 5 (5) 2 (2) 4.0 (0.45–35.8) 0.215
Exposed to cooking smoke during cooking 86 (81) 78 (74) 1.7 (0.82–3.6) 0.149
Carried children (<2 y) on the back whiule cooking, n = 74 24 (65) 20 (54) 1.6 (0.60–4.6) 0.323
Used mosquito repellent or fires to keep body warm
10 (9.4)
5 (4.7)
2.7 (0.71–10.1)
0.147
Child currently breast-feeding 31 (29) 37 (35) 0.25 (0.05–1.2) 0.080

*p value by Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test.

Conclusions

Before the current cases, the most recent sporadic cases in The Gambia were reported in the early 1990s. These cases were part of a larger epidemic in the meningitis belt with a comparable predominance of serogroup W135 followed by S. pneumoniae (1). After introduction of MenAfriVac (serogroup A conjugate vaccine), incidence and epidemics caused by serogroup A decreased substantially in the meningitis belt (6,12). The reemergence of epidemic serogroup W135 in this region requires a strategy for surveillance, epidemic detection and control, and revised vaccination policy.

Serogroup A outbreaks usually affect children >5 years of age and young adults (5,13,14). However, two thirds of the serogroup W135 cases occurred in children <5 years of age, for whom the AR was 5-fold higher than it was for older age groups, similar to the characteristics of the serogroups W135 outbreaks in Burkina Faso (2002–2003) and Niger (2010) (3,5). Therefore, the current operational definition of alert and epidemic thresholds, drawn mostly from serogroup A data, should be revised because merging the AR for all age groups may delay, or result in nondetection of, a serogroup W135 epidemic in younger age groups.

Signs and symptoms of concurrent respiratory illness were more prevalent among case-patients than controls;, itchy eyes and difficult breathing were associated with disease. The temporal sequence of these signs relative to the occurrence of meningococcal disease was not determined, and whether these factors facilitated the invasion of serogroup W135 carried in the nasopharynx or whether these symptoms were part of the initial serogroup W135 infection before onset of severe disease is unclear. Contact with confirmed serogroup W135 case-patients was a strong risk factor. These results are consistent with information available for the other serogroups and with the route of serogroup W135 transmission through droplet infection (15).

Our findings suggest that isolation of case-patients and prophylactic treatment of contacts may reduce transmission of meningococcal disease during epidemics. Enhanced surveillance for meningitis is recommended for early detection of epidemics. The occurrence of this large serogroup W135 outbreak suggests that multiserogroup conjugate vaccine should be deployed for control and prevention.

Acknowledgment

We thank the communities of the CRR and URR of The Gambia, the staff of the government health facilities, the Regional Health Teams, and the Ministry of Health for participating and supporting outbreak investigation. We also thank Lady Chilel Sanyang and Jarrah Manneh for laboratory testing; Golam Sarwar and Sarra Baldeh for organizing the data; and Edrissa Sabally and Yerro Bah for coordinating the field team and data collection. We thank Pa Cheboh Saine for the logistical support.

The study was supported by the Medical Research Council. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funded the prospective bacterial disease surveillance.

Biography

Dr Hossain is a clinical epidemiologist and medical graduate working in the Child Survival Theme of the Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia. His research interests are diarrheal diseases, emerging infections, and infectious diseases.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Hossain MJ, Roca A, Mackenzie GA, Jasseh M, Hossain MI, Muhammad S, et al. Serogroup W135 meningococcal disease, The Gambia, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013 Sep [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1909.130077

References

  • 1.Meningococcal disease in countries of the African meningitis belt, 2012—emerging needs and future perspectives. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013;88:129–36 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Greenwood B. Manson lecture. Meningococcal meningitis in Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:341–53. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90106-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nathan N, Rose AM, Legros D, Tiendrebeogo SR, Bachy C, Bjorlow E, et al. Meningitis serogroup W135 outbreak, Burkina Faso, 2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:920–3. 10.3201/eid1306.060940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Enhanced surveillance of epidemic meningococcal meningitis in Africa: a three-year experience. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2005;80:313–20 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collard JM, Maman Z, Yacouba H, Djibo S, Nicolas P, Jusot JF, et al. Increase in Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135, Niger, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1496–8. 10.3201/eid1609.100510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Novak RT, Kambou JL, Diomande FV, Tarbangdo TF, Ouedraogo-Traore R, Sangare L, et al. Serogroup A meningococcal conjugate vaccination in Burkina Faso: analysis of national surveillance data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:757–64. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70168-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kwara A, Adegbola RA, Corrah PT, Weber M, Achtman M, Morelli G, et al. Meningitis caused by a serogroup W135 clone of the ET-37 complex of Neisseria meningitidis in West Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 1998;3:742–6. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00300.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hodgson A, Smith T, Gagneux S, Adjuik M, Pluschke G, Mensah NK, et al. Risk factors for meningococcal meningitis in northern Ghana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:477–80. 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90007-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Greenwood BM, Greenwood AM, Bradley AK, Williams K, Hassan-King M, Shenton FC, et al. Factors influencing susceptibility to meningococcal disease during an epidemic in The Gambia, West Africa. J Infect. 1987;14:167–84. 10.1016/S0163-4453(87)92052-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mackenzie GA, Plumb ID, Sambou S, Saha D, Uchendu U, Akinsola B, et al. Monitoring the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines into West Africa: design and implementation of a population-based surveillance system. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001161. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. Standard operating procedures for enhanced meningitis surveillance in Africa. Version: August 2009. [cited 2012 Mar 5]. http://www.afro.who.int
  • 12.Kristiansen PA, Diomande F, Ba AK, Sanou I, Ouedraogo AS, Ouedraogo R, et al. Impact of the serogroup A meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenAfriVac, on carriage and herd immunity. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:354–63. 10.1093/cid/cis892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Greenwood B. Priorities for research on meningococcal disease and the impact of serogroup A vaccination in the African meningitis belt. Vaccine. 2013;31:1453–7. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Greenwood BM, Bradley AK, Smith AW, Wall RA. Mortality from meningococcal disease during an epidemic in The Gambia, West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81:536–8. 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90397-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wilder-Smith A, Barkham TM, Earnest A, Paton NI. Acquisition of W135 meningococcal carriage in Hajj pilgrims and transmission to household contacts: prospective study. BMJ. 2002;325:365–6. 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES