Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Oct 15;93(21):11709–11712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11709

Nocturnality and species survival.

G C Daily 1, P R Ehrlich 1
PMCID: PMC38123  PMID: 8876201

Abstract

Surveys of butterfly and moth diversity in tropical forest fragments suggest that nocturnality confers a dispersal, and possibly a survival, advantage. The butterfly faunas of smaller fragments were depauperate; in contrast, the species richness of nocturnal moths was similar in all fragments and even in pasture. The lack of correlation between butterfly and moth species richness among fragments (r2 = 0.005) is best explained by movements of moths at night when ambient conditions in forest and pasture are most similar; butterflies face substantial daytime temperature, humidity, and solar radiation barriers. This interpretation is supported by information on birds, beetles, and bats.

Full text

PDF
11709

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jablonski D. Extinctions: a paleontological perspective. Science. 1991 Aug 16;253(5021):754–757. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5021.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pimm S. L., Russell G. J., Gittleman J. L., Brooks T. M. The future of biodiversity. Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):347–350. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES