Abstract
Objective
To examine the association between maternal hospital diagnoses of obesity and risk of cerebral palsy (CP) in the child.
Study design
For all California hospital births from 1991–2001, we linked infant and maternal hospitalization discharge abstracts to California Department of Developmental Services records of children receiving services for CP. We identified maternal hospital discharge diagnoses of obesity (ICD-9 646.1, 278.00 or 278.01) and morbid obesity (ICD-9 278.01), and performed logistic regression to explore the relationship between maternal obesity diagnoses and CP.
Results
Among 6.2 million births, 67,200 (1.1%) mothers were diagnosed with obesity, and 7878 (0.1%) with morbid obesity; 8798 (0.14%) children had CP. A maternal diagnosis of obesity (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09–1.55) or morbid obesity (RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.89–3.86) was associated with increased risk of CP. In multivariable analysis adjusting for maternal race, age, education, prenatal care, insurance status and infant sex, both obesity (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06 – 1.52) and morbid obesity (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.79 – 3.66) remained independently associated with CP. On stratified analyses, the association of obesity (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.25 – 2.35) or morbid obesity (RR 3.79, 95% CI 2.35 – 6.10) with CP was only significant among women who were hospitalized prior to the birth admission. Adjusting for potential comorbidities and complications of obesity did not eliminate this association.
Conclusions
Maternal obesity may confer an increased risk of CP in some cases. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Keywords: cerebral palsy, maternal obesity, inflammation, epidemiology
Cerebral palsy (CP) refers to a heterogeneous group of disorders of the development of movement and posture caused by non-progressive lesions occurring in the developing fetal or infant brain.1 It is one of the most common motor disabilities in childhood, occurring in two to four per 1,000 live births.2 Etiologic studies have largely focused on the role of perinatal factors, such as chorioamnionitis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. However, it is estimated that brain injury occurring during the perinatal and post-natal periods accounts for the minority of cases of CP.3,4 Moreover, despite improvements in perinatal care in recent decades, most studies have failed to demonstrate any significant decline in the prevalence of CP.5,6,7 These findings suggest that prenatal factors, including maternal conditions that are present before the onset of labor, may contribute to the pathogenesis of CP in a significant proportion of cases.
The obesity epidemic is a critical public health issue in the United States.8 Among women of childbearing age (20 to 44), nearly half are overweight or obese.9 Maternal obesity is associated with adverse outcomes in both mother and child, including gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, increased rates of cesarean delivery, stillbirth, birth defects and neonatal encephalopathy.10,11,12 A growing literature suggests that maternal obesity also detrimentally affects the fetal brain.13,14 Furthermore, obesity induces a chronic inflammatory state, and maternal inflammatory conditions such as chorioamnionitis are known to contribute to CP.15,16
Studies addressing maternal obesity and CP have produced conflicting results. In Australia, one study found a 3.5-fold increased risk of CP among term infants born to obese mothers,17 whereas two others reported no significant association.18,19 A recent study in Sweden reported a marginally significant association between increased maternal weight at 34 weeks and CP (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.03).20 In a large California population, we sought to determine whether a maternal hospital diagnosis of obesity during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of moderate to severe CP in the child.
METHODS
We conducted a population-based study of all infants born in California hospitals during the eleven-year period from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 2001. Data were retrieved from three statewide sources: (1) the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Patient Discharge Abstracts; (2) the Department of Health Services Linked Vital Statistics Birth and Infant Death file; and (3) the California Department of Developmental Services. Linkage of these three sources was performed using probabilistic record linkage technique with 98% linkage accuracy.21 All study procedures were approved by the California Protection of Human Subjects Committee and by the institutional review boards at the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, the University of California, San Francisco and the University of California, Davis.
The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) maintains a database of discharge abstracts for all admissions to nonfederal hospitals, representing 96% (571 of 594) of all hospitals in the state. According to the 1991–1998 California natality figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 96.7% of all live births in California were recorded in the OSHPD hospital discharge dataset. Maternal hospitalization discharge diagnoses from one year before delivery through the birth hospitalization are included, as are infant discharge diagnoses from the birth hospitalization. Each record contains information regarding a single mother-infant pair. Therefore, individual women who gave birth to more than one child during this time period are represented more than once in the study population.
From the linked California Department of Health Services’ Vital Statistics Birth files, we extracted maternal and infant sociodemographic characteristics including maternal age at delivery, race, ethnicity, education, level of prenatal care and parity; multiple gestation; and infant sex, birth weight and gestational age. We determined the source of payment for the birth hospitalization as an indicator of socioeconomic status; women who were publicly insured or uninsured were categorized as having low insurance status, whereas women with private or managed care insurance were categorized as having high insurance status.
The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) sponsors a statewide program that provides occupational and physical therapy and social services for residents of the state who have a substantive disability related to CP, regardless of income. CP is defined as a non-progressive lesion or disorder in the brain occurring during intrauterine life or the perinatal period and characterized by paralysis, spasticity or abnormal control of movement or posture that is manifest before two years of age. Each year, individuals who receive services from the DDS receive a comprehensive evaluation by a staff physician who records data regarding medical diagnoses including CP. We identified study subjects who qualified for DDS services for CP before November 30, 2006. Thus, all children in our study were at least five years old at the time of CP ascertainment. We excluded children with known postnatal causes of CP, including child abuse (n = 272), motor vehicle and other injuries (n = 213) and near drowning (n = 72).
We searched the OSHPD database for maternal hospitalization records that contained the following discharge diagnoses related to obesity, as coded by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, ninth Revision (ICD-9): obesity of pregnancy (646.1), unspecified obesity (278.0) and morbid obesity (278.01). We categorized maternal obesity diagnoses into two separate time periods: (1) “prenatal,” indicating diagnoses made during a maternal hospitalization in the twelve months prior to the birth hospitalization, and (2) “perinatal,” indicating diagnoses made during the birth hospitalization. We calculated bivariate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to compare CP rates in children of women with and without obesity diagnoses.
We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs to determine whether CP prevalence in children of women with and without obesity diagnoses remained statistically different after adjusting for the following sociodemographic risk factors: maternal race, age, educational attainment, prenatal care, insurance status and infant sex. We considered two sets of maternal obesity diagnoses in our multivariate analysis: a specific diagnosis of morbid obesity, or any diagnosis of obesity including morbid obesity, unspecified obesity or obesity of pregnancy. All ORs closely approximate the RR given the low prevalence of CP. Analyses were performed using Stata statistical package (version 12.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).
In order to investigate factors that might mediate the association between maternal obesity and CP, we identified maternal and infant complications that were associated with both maternal obesity and CP and adjusted for these potential mediators in a logistic regression model. We analyzed the following discharge diagnoses: pregestational diabetes (ICD-9 648.0), gestational diabetes (648.8), preeclampsia (642.4–5 and 642.7), eclampsia (642.6), hypertension (ICD-9 401 – 405), hypertension of pregnancy (ICD-9 642), chorioamnionitis (658.4), any perinatal infection (646.6, 647.9, 659.3 and 670), placental abruption (641.2), obstructed labor (660.0–9), cord prolapse (663.0), uterine rupture (665.1), medical induction of labor (73.4) and surgical induction of labor (73.1), prematurity (765), birth defects (740 – 759), birth trauma (767), severe birth asphyxia (768.5) and any birth asphyxia (768.5–9). Parity, instrumental delivery, artificial rupture of membranes and other factors which were not significantly associated with both maternal obesity and CP were not included in the model. Birthweight was not included because it was collinear with prematurity.
RESULTS
Among 6,221,001 infants born in California hospitals between 1991 and 2001, we identified 8,397 cases of CP. Population prevalence of CP was 1.4 per 1,000 live births. Among all mother-baby pairs in the birth population, maternal obesity was diagnosed in 67,200 (1.10%), and maternal morbid obesity was diagnosed in 7878 (0.13%). Compared with white women, black women were more likely to have a diagnosis of morbid obesity (RR 2.47, 95% CI 2.32 – 2.63), whereas Asian (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.09 – 0.13) and Hispanic women (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78 – 0.86) were less likely (Table I). Similar racial differences existed among women diagnosed with obesity of pregnancy or unspecified obesity. Obesity diagnoses were more common in women age 35 years or older, women who had not graduated from college, women with private insurance coverage and women receiving prenatal care.
TABLE 1.
% of Cohort | Any Obesity (%) | Morbid Obesity (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal age, years | |||
< 35 | 86 | 1.08 | 0.12 |
≥ 35 | 14 | 1.16 | 0.17 |
Maternal race/ethnicity | |||
White | 35 | 1.28 | 0.13 |
Hispanic | 46 | 0.87 | 0.11 |
Asian | 10 | 0.87 | 0.01 |
Black | 7 | 1.73 | 0.33 |
Other | 1 | 1.93 | 0.30 |
Maternal education, years | |||
Primary school or none (0–5y) | 5 | 0.44 | 0.05 |
Secondary school (6–11y) | 28 | 0.77 | 0.10 |
High school graduate (12y) | 29 | 1.36 | 0.17 |
Some college (13–15y) | 20 | 1.44 | 0.17 |
College graduate (≥ 16y) | 18 | 0.95 | 0.07 |
Insurance status | |||
Private coverage | 49 | 1.39 | 0.14 |
Medicare/Medicaid/Self-Pay | 49 | 0.79 | 0.12 |
Prenatal careb | |||
Any | 99 | 1.10 | 0.13 |
None | 1 | 0.46 | 0.09 |
Parity | |||
Multiparous | 62 | 1.01 | 0.13 |
Nulliparous | 38 | 1.19 | 0.12 |
P < 0.001 for all comparisons unless otherwise noted.
P < 0.005.
A maternal diagnosis of obesity at any time was associated with a 30% increased risk of delivering a child with CP (RR 1.30, 1.09–1.55). The risk of CP was even higher among infants born to a mother who was diagnosed with morbid obesity at any time (RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.89–3.86). The highest risk of CP (Table II) was seen in infants born to a mother who was diagnosed with morbid obesity during a prenatal hospitalization (RR 5.76, 95% CI 2.75–12.05).
TABLE 2.
CP per 1,000 | RR | 95% CI | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prenatal diagnosisa | ||||
Obesity of pregnancy | 4.3 | 3.04 | 1.45 – 6.38 | 0.002 |
Unspecified obesity | 5.9 | 4.17 | 2.31 – 7.52 | <0.001 |
Morbid obesity | 8.1 | 5.76 | 2.75 – 12.05 | <0.001 |
Any of the above | 5.5 | 3.88 | 2.58 – 5.84 | <0.001 |
No obesity diagnosis | 1.4 | 1.00 | Reference | |
Perinatal diagnosisb | ||||
Obesity of pregnancy | 1.3 | 0.90 | 0.69 – 1.18 | 0.44 |
Unspecified obesity | 2.2 | 1.57 | 1.13– 2.18 | 0.01 |
Morbid obesity | 3.2 | 2.25 | 1.49 – 3.38 | <0.001 |
Any of the above | 1.7 | 1.22 | 1.01 – 1.47 | 0.04 |
No obesity diagnosis | 1.4 | 1.00 | Reference | |
Prenatal or perinatal diagnosisc | ||||
Obesity of pregnancy | 1.3 | 0.95 | 0.74 – 1.23 | 0.71 |
Unspecified obesity | 2.5 | 1.75 | 1.30 – 2.35 | <0.001 |
Morbid obesity | 3.8 | 2.70 | 1.89 – 3.86 | <0.001 |
Any of the above | 1.8 | 1.30 | 1.09 – 1.55 | 0.004 |
No obesity diagnosis | 1.4 | 1.00 | Reference |
Includes any diagnosis given during any hospitalization in the 12 months prior to the birth hospitalization.
Includes any diagnosis given during the birth hospitalization.
Includes any diagnosis given during any hospitalization in the 12 months prior to and including the birth hospitalization.
In a multivariate logistic regression controlling for maternal race, age and education, prenatal care, private insurance coverage and infant sex, women with a diagnosis of morbid obesity at any time had significantly increased risk of having a child with CP after adjusting for these factors (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.79 – 3.66). Similarly, any maternal diagnosis of obesity (morbid obesity, unspecified obesity or obesity of pregnancy) at any time period was an independent risk factor for delivering a child with CP (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06 – 1.52). Other independent risk factors for CP included maternal age > 35 years, no college graduation, lack of prenatal care and male sex (Table III).
TABLE 3.
Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Morbid obesity | 2.56 | 1.79 – 3.66 | <0.001 |
Maternal race | |||
White | 1.00 | Reference | |
Black | 1.25 | 1.16 – 1.36 | <0.001 |
Hispanic | 0.96 | 0.91 – 1.02 | 0.20 |
Asian | 0.79 | 0.73 – 0.86 | <0.001 |
Other | 0.98 | 0.81 – 1.19 | 0.85 |
Maternal age ≥ 35 years | 1.39 | 1.31 – 1.47 | <0.001 |
Maternal education, years | |||
Primary school or none (0–5 y) | 1.32 | 1.17 – 1.49 | <0.001 |
Secondary school (6–11 y) | 1.24 | 1.14 – 1.34 | <0.001 |
High school graduate (12 y) | 1.20 | 1.11 – 1.29 | <0.001 |
Some college (13–15 y) | 1.14 | 1.06 – 1.22 | 0.001 |
College graduate (> 16 y) | 1.00 | Reference | |
No prenatal care | 2.25 | 1.95 – 2.59 | <0.001 |
Low insurance status b | 1.03 | 0.98 – 1.08 | 0.32 |
Male infant | 1.31 | 1.26 – 1.37 | <0.001 |
Logistic regression model includes all the variables listed in the table.
Medicare/Medicaid/Self-Insured
Each of the following medical complications, diagnosed at any time, was significantly associated with maternal obesity (Table IV), as well as with increased risk of CP: maternal diabetes, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, maternal hypertension, chorioamnionitis, perinatal infection, placental abruption, uterine rupture, cord prolapse, obstructed labor, low birth weight, preterm delivery, birth trauma, and birth defects. When each of these potential mediators was added individually into the multivariate model, little appreciable change was seen in the association between maternal obesity and CP. Adding all of the above factors together into the multivariate model attenuated but did not eliminate the association between morbid obesity (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.39 – 2.93) or any diagnosis of obesity (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05 – 1.52) with CP. Infants who were large for gestational age (i.e. > 4500 grams) had a reduced risk of CP (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 – 0.85). Thus, although obese women were at higher risk of delivering large for gestational age babies (RR 2.9, 95% CI 2.80 – 3.00), the increased risk of CP associated with obesity diagnoses was not explained by the presence of larger babies.
TABLE 4.
Potential Mediator | Morbid obesity
|
Cerebral palsy
|
---|---|---|
RRa (95% CI) | RRb (95% CI) | |
Maternal conditions | ||
Hypertension | 24.9 (22.9 – 27.1) | 2.82 (2.22 – 3.58) |
Hypertension of pregnancy | 5.92 (5.72 – 6.13) | 1.89 (1.75 – 2.03) |
Pregestational diabetes | 10.27 (9.46 – 11.16) | 2.10 (1.76 – 2.52) |
Gestational diabetes | 5.31 (5.05 – 5.57) | 1.35 (1.22 – 1.50) |
Any diabetes | 5.91 (5.67 – 6.16) | 1.45 (1.33 – 1.59) |
Eclampsia | 5.57 (4.07 – 7.62) | 3.31 (2.26 – 4.86) |
Preeclampsia | 4.77 (4.50 – 5.05) | 2.16 (1.98 – 2.37) |
Delivery complications | ||
Uterine rupture | 3.61 (2.27 – 5.73) | 10.6 (8.24 – 13.7) |
Cord prolapse | 1.91 (1.41 – 2.59) | 5.24 (4.40 – 6.24) |
Obstructed labor | 1.91 (1.80 – 2.03) | 1.22 (1.13 – 1.32) |
Any perinatal infection | 1.88 (1.74 – 2.03) | 3.02 (2.83 – 3.22) |
Chorioamnionitis | 1.77 (1.56 – 1.97) | 4.06 (3.76 – 4.39) |
Preterm delivery | 1.45 (1.37 – 1.53) | 5.08 (4.86 – 5.31) |
Placental abruption | 1.42 (1.17 – 1.72) | 6.34 (5.79 – 6.95) |
Infant conditions | ||
Birth defects | 1.51 (1.41 – 1.62) | 7.14 (6.83 – 7.47) |
Risk of maternal or perinatal complication in women with a pre- or perinatal diagnosis of morbid obesity compared to women with no obesity diagnosis.
Risk of having a child with CP among women with maternal or perinatal complication compared to women without maternal or perinatal complication.
The likelihood of being diagnosed with obesity at any time in the twelve months leading up to and including the birth hospitalization was twice as high among women who were hospitalized during the prenatal period as compared with those without a prenatal hospitalization (2.04% vs. 1.01%, p < 0.001). This was an anticipated difference given that women who were hospitalized more frequently would have more opportunities to have a documented hospital diagnosis of obesity. The risk of having a child with CP was also higher among women who required a prenatal hospitalization when compared with women who were not hospitalized before the birth admission (0.26% vs 0.13%, p < 0.001). To address the concern for potential ascertainment bias, we conducted a stratified analysis.
Among the 7.12% of women who required a prenatal hospitalization, a diagnosis at any time of morbid obesity (RR 3.79, 95% CI 2.35 – 6.10) or any obesity (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.25 – 2.35) was associated with increased risk of having a child with CP, compared with women who required prenatal hospitalization but did not have an obesity diagnosis. Adjusting for potential mediators (ie, maternal diabetes, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, maternal hypertension, chorioamnionitis, perinatal infection, placental abruption, uterine rupture, cord prolapse, obstructed labor, low birth weight, preterm delivery, birth trauma and birth defects) did not eliminate this association. In contrast, obese pregnant women who did not require hospitalization before the birth admission did not exhibit an increased risk of CP (morbid obesity: RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.93 – 2.76; any obesity: RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87 – 1.34).
DISCUSSION
Maternal obesity increases the risk of several maternal and obstetrical complications, including gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia10,11, chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery.22,23 These complications can lead to prenatal hospitalizations and thus could potentially account for the increased risk of CP observed among obese mothers who were hospitalized in the prenatal period. However, adjusting for obesity related pregnancy and obstetric complications did not eliminate the observed association between obesity diagnoses and CP, suggesting that none of these known complications of obesity explain this finding.
Obesity-induced inflammation could explain how maternal obesity affects CP risk. Maternal inflammatory conditions such as chorioamnionitis have been associated with fetal inflammation,16 a known risk factor for neonatal brain injury and CP.24,25 In animal models of neonatal brain injury, the presence of maternal inflammatory mediators increases the susceptibility of the fetal brain to hypoxic-ischemic injury.26, 27,28 It is possible that an obesity-associated inflammatory milieu could make the fetus more susceptible to hypoxic-ischemic insults that might otherwise have been tolerated, though this remains speculation.
Adipose tissue is a highly active endocrine organ and a source of pro-inflammatory mediators.29 Obesity induces a state of chronic, low-grade inflammation characterized by elevated inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8.30 When obesity complicates pregnancy, which is itself an inflammatory state marked by increased concentrations of cytokines and increased activation of maternal neutrophils and macrophages, an exaggerated state of inflammatory up-regulation results.31 Serum levels of leptin, CRP and IL-6 are increased in obese pregnant women compared with non-obese pregnant women,32,33 and CRP, IL-6, ICAM-1 and IL-10 levels are elevated in obese compared with lean pregnant women.34 A localized placental inflammatory response has been described in obese pregnant women, with a two- to three-fold increase in placental macrophage expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, TNF and IL-6.35 Alterations in plasma cytokine levels in obese women have also been associated with decreased placental function during the first trimester.33
The relationship between maternal obesity and CP has been studied previously in three Australian cohorts. Walstab et al found that maternal BMI > 25 was associated with a 3.5-fold (P= 0.02) increased risk of moderate to severe CP among term infants.17 In contrast, two other studies reported no association between maternal weight and CP, though no point estimates were given18,19; these studies may not have had adequate power to detect an association. Other studies have investigated the association between maternal obesity and other neurodevelopmental problems in the child.36,37 A recent population study found that children born to obese mothers had an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay.38
The association between maternal obesity diagnoses and CP was limited to the subset of women requiring prenatal hospitalization. This group comprised only 7% of the women in the study cohort. Thus, for the vast majority of women in our large population, having an obesity diagnosis did not put them at increased risk of having a child with CP. This may be reassuring for obese women who are able to remain healthy enough to avoid hospitalization during their pregnancy. Prenatal complications that require hospitalization, such as preterm labor and infection, often have an inflammatory component.39 It is possible that the inflammation induced by maternal obesity may be particularly harmful in pregnancies that are already complicated by other underlying inflammatory conditions, especially in the preterm infant. Prospective studies of maternal obesity are needed to better understand how inflammatory prenatal conditions heighten a woman’s risk of having a child with CP.
Our study has several limitations. The prevalence of CP (1.4 per 1000) is lower than previously reported (2–4 per 1000).2 The DDS provides services to more severely impaired children, and thus we are limited to establishing an association between maternal obesity and moderate to severe CP. The maternal discharge diagnoses are susceptible to coding errors; however, inaccuracies are likely to be non-differential with respect to CP and to bias the results towards the null, because the diagnoses were coded prior to knowledge of the child’s future condition. Potential confounders not included in the hospital discharge data, such as history of infertility, could not be assessed in this study. Obesity is significantly under-ascertained in our dataset, and there are presumably many women in this population who are obese but were not diagnosed as such. However, women who were identified as obese in this study were likely to be definitively obese, suggesting that the observed association between obesity and CP is real. It is possible that mothers are more likely to be diagnosed with obesity if their baby suffers newborn complications, causing ascertainment bias for obesity. However, the association with CP was strongest for maternal obesity diagnosed before the birth hospitalization, suggesting that our findings are not due to bias arising from neonatal complications leading to enhanced coding for maternal obesity. Strengths of our study include the large study population and the lack of recall bias. Better understanding of the relationship between maternal obesity during pregnancy and risk of CP in the child may provide new opportunities for intervention.
Acknowledgments
Funded by the Cerebral Palsy International Research Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (R03-HD050575 and TL1 RR024129), the National Center for Research Resources, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Office of the Director.
Abbreviations
- CP
cerebral palsy
- CRP
C-reactive protein
- DDS
Department of Developmental Services
- ICD-9
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
- IL
interleukin
- OSHPD
Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
- TNF
tumor necrosis factor
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errorsmaybe discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, Leviton A, Paneth N, Dan B, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurology. 2005;47:571–6. doi: 10.1017/s001216220500112x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nelson KB. The epidemiology of cerebral palsy in term infants. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:146–50. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The origins of cerebral palsy--a consensus statement. The Australian and New Zealand Perinatal Societies. Med J Aust. 1995;162:85–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schendel DE, Schuchat A, Thorsen P. Public health issues related to infection in pregnancy and cerebral palsy. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:39–45. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clark SL, Hankins GD. Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy—fact and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:628–33. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yeargin-Allsopp M, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg NS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Durkin MS. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in 8-year-old children in three areas of the United States in 2002: a multisite collaboration. Pediatrics. 2008;121:547–54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reid SM, Carlin JB, Reddihough DS. Rates of cerebral palsy in Victoria, Australia, 1970 to 2004: has there been a change? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:907–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ogden C, Carroll M. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults: United States, Trends 1960–1962 through 2007–2008. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity_adult_07_08/obesity_adult_07_08.htm.
- 9.Vahratian A. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among women of childbearing age: results from the 2002 national survey of family growth. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13:268–73. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0340-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siega-Riz AM, Siega-Riz AM, Laraia B. The implications of maternal overweight and obesity on the course of pregnancy and birth outcomes. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10:S153–6. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0115-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301:636–50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Locatelli A, Incerti M, Paterlini G, Doria V, Consonni S, Provero C, et al. Antepartum and intrapartum risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy at term. Am J Perinatol. 2010;27:649–54. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bilbo SD, Tsang V. Enduring consequences of maternal obesity for brain inflammation and behavior of offspring. FASEB J. 2010;24:2104–15. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-144014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tozuka Y, Kumon M, Wada E, Onodera M, Mochizuki H, Wada K. Maternal obesity impairs hippocampal BDNF production and spatial learning performance in young mouse offspring. Neurochem Int. 2010;57:235–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Romero R, Gotsch F, Pineles B, Kusanovic JP. Inflammation in pregnancy: its roles in reproductive physiology, obstetrical complications and fetal injury. Nutr Rev. 2007;65:S194–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shatrov JG, Birch SC, Lam LT, Quinlivan JA, McIntyre S, Mendz GL. Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:387–92. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e90046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Walstab J, Bell R, Reddihough D, Brennecke S, Bessell C, Beischer N. Antenatal and intrapartum antecedents of cerebral palsy: a case-control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42:138–46. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blair E, Stanley F. When can cerebral palsy be prevented? The generation of causal hypotheses by multivariate analysis of a case-control study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993;7:272–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.O’Callaghan ME, MacLennan AH, Gibson CS, McMichael GL, Haan EA, Broadbent JL, et al. Epidemiologic associations with cerebral palsy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:576–82. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ad2dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ahlin K, Himmelmann K, Hagberg G, Kacervosky M, Cobo T, Wennerholm UB, et al. Non-infectious risk factors for different types of cerebral palsy in term-born babies: a population-based, case-control study. BJOG. 2013 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12164. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Herrchen B, Gould JB, Nesbitt TS. Vital statistics linked birth/infant death and hospital discharge record linkage for epidemiological studies. Comput Biomed Res. 1997;30:290–305. doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1997.1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kabiru W, Raynor BD. Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:928–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:943–51. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000142713.53197.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rees S, Harding R, Walker D. The biological basis of injury and neuroprotection in the fetal and neonatal brain. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011;29:551–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dammann O, Leviton A. Infection remote from the brain, neonatal white matter damage, and cerebral palsy in the infant. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 1998;5:190–201. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9091(98)80034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eklind S, Mallard C, Leverin AL, Gilland E, Blomgren K, Baltzer, et al. Bacterial endotoxin sensitizes the immature brain to hypoxic-ischaemic injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13:1101–1106. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01474.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang X, Rousset C, Hagberg H, Mallard C. Lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and perinatal brain injury. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11:343–53. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Larouch A, Roy M, Kadhim H, Tsanaclis AM, Fortin D, Sebire G. Neuronal injuries induced by perinatal hypoxic-ischemic insults are potentiated by prenatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide: animal model for perinatally acquired encephalopathy. Dev Neurosci. 2005;27:134–42. doi: 10.1159/000085985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chudek J, Wiecek A. Adipose tissue, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Pharmacol Rep. 2006;58:81–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Denison FC, Roberts KA, Barr SM, Norman JE. Obesity, pregnancy, inflammation and vascular function. Reproduction. 2010;140:373–85. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schmatz M, Madan J, Marino T, Davis J. Maternal obesity: the interplay between inflammation, mother and fetus. J Perinatol. 2010;30:441–6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ramsay JE, Ferrell WR, Crawford L, Wallace Am, Greer IA, Sattar N. Maternal obesity is associated with dysregulation of metabolic, vascular and inflammatory pathways. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:4231–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Madan JC, Davis JM, Craig WY, Collins M, Allan W, Quinn R, et al. Maternal obesity and markers of inflammation in pregnancy. Cytokine. 2009;47:61–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stewart FM, Freeman DJ, Ramsay JE, Greer IA, Caslake M, Ferrell WR. Longitudinal assessment of maternal endothelial function and markers of inflammation and placental function throughout pregnancy in lean and obese mothers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:969–75. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Challier JC, Basu S, Bintein T, Minium J, Hotmire K, Catalano PM, et al. Obesity in pregnancy stimulates macrophage accumulation and inflammation in the placenta. Placenta. 2008;29:274–81. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2007.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mann J, McDermott S, Hardin J, Pan C, Zhang Z. Pre-pregnancy body mass index, weight change during pregnancy, and risk of intellectual disability in children. BJOG. 2012 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dodds L, Fell DB, Shea S, Armson BA, Allen AC, Bryson S. The role of prenatal, obstetric and neonatal factors in the development of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41:891–902. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1114-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Krakowiak P, Walker CK, Bremer AA, Baker AS, Ozonoff S, Hansen RL, et al. Maternal metabolic conditions and risk for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatrics. 2012;129:1121–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Romero R, Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Kusanovic JP, Friel L, Hassan S. The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:21–39. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]