Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR logoLink to Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR
. 2013 Winter;12(1):63–74.

In-vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Some Iranian Conifers

Maryam Afsharzadeh a, Mahboobe Naderinasab b, Zahra Tayarani Najaran a, Mohammad Barzin c, Seyed Ahmad Emami c,*
PMCID: PMC3813213  PMID: 24250573

Abstract

Male and female leaves and fruits of eleven different taxons of Iranian conifers (Cupressus sempervirens var. horizontalis, C. sempervirens var. sempervirens, C. sempervirens cv. Cereifeormis, Juniperus communis subsp. hemisphaerica, J. excelsa subsp. excelsa, J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos, J. foetidissima, J. oblonga, J. sabina, Platycladus orientalis and Taxus baccata) were collected from different localities of Iran, dried and extracted with methanol. The extracts were tested for their antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. The extracts were screened qualitatively using four different methods, the disc diffusion, hole plate, cylinder agar diffusion and agar dilution methods, whereas the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of each extract were determined by the agar dilution method. The best result was obtained by means of hole plate method in qualitative determination of antimicrobial activities of extracts and the greatest activity was found against S. aureus in all tested methods.

Key Words: Antimicrobial activity, Cupressus, Cupressaceae, Juniperus, Platycladus, Taxaceae, Taxus

Introduction

Iranian conifers consist of two families: Cupressaceae and Taxaceae. Cupressaceae consists of one species of Cupressus and one species of Platycladus. The Taxaceae consists of only one species of Taxus.

C. sempervirens, P. orientalisand J. excelsasubspexcelsaare monoecious and others are diecious (1-3).

An antioxidant activity of methanol extracts of Iranian conifers were investigated previously (4). Cytotoxic study on these plants showed their anti-proliferative activity in cell lines (5-8).

The progressive resistance of human pathogen microbes against antibiotics, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), is a growing problem and it is therefore extremely important to find out and develop new antimicrobial compounds. The screening of plant extracts for their antimicrobial activity has shown that higher plants represent a potential source of new anti-infective compounds (9).

The antimicrobial efficacy of obtained oils from different species of Iranian conifers was showed previously (10-14).

The purpose of this study is to investigate potential antimicrobial activity of methanol extracts of Iranian conifers, by means of the hole plate, cylinder and disc agar diffusion and agar dilution methods in order to compare the suitability of the screening methods. Whereas the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of each extract were determined by the agar dilution method.

Experimental

Plant material

Plant specimens were collected from different parts of the country (Table 1). The plants were identified by Dr. M. Assadi, Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands, Ministry of Jahad Keshavarzi, Iran, Voucher specimens of the taxa have been deposited in the Herbarium of National Botanical Garden of Iran (TARI).

Table 1.

Plant specimens from different parts of the country

Plant Region Height Date Voucher specimen No
C. semipervirens L. var. horizontalis (Mill.) Aiton [syn. C. horizontalis Mill.] Sorkesh, Aliabad Katool, Golestan province 950 m 2 Oct. 2002 72898
C. semipervirens L. var semipervirens
[syn. C. Pyramidalis Targ.-Tozz]
Ecological Garden of Nowshar, Mazandaran province 23 m 5 Oct. 2002 72890
C. semipervirens L. cv. Cereifeormis campus of Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi province 920 m 3 March 2003 72893
J. communis L. subsp. hemisphaerica (Presl) Nyman [syn. J. hemisphaerica Presl] between Damulo and Cephali, Golestan province 2063 m 4 Oct. 2002 72897
J. oblonga M. Beib. between Makidi and Vainagh, Arasbaran, East Azarbaijan province 1500 m 6 July 2002 72891
J. excelsa M. Beib. subsp excelsa Kelisa Kharabeh, margin of Aras river, East Azarbayejan province 1400-1600 m 30 Nov. 2002 72895
J. excelsa M.Beib. subsp. polycarpos (K.Koch) Takhtajan [syn. J. polycarpos C. Koch] Chopoughlou Darahsi, East Azarbaijan province 1593 m 21 Sept. 2002 72900
J. foetidissima Willd. Makidi and Vainagh, Arasbaran, East Azarbaijan province 1400 m 23 Sept. 2002 72896
J. sabina L. Sourkesh, Aliabad Katool, Golestan province 2050 m 3 Oct. 2002 No: 72899
P. orientalis (L.) Franco [syn: T. orientalis L.] Sourkesh, Aliabad Katool, Golestan province 2050 m 2 Oct. 2002 72894
T. baccata L. Armaniolan, Arasbaran, East Azarbayejan province 1175 m 23 Sept. 2002 72892

The collected materials were stored at -20°C in order to avoid unfavorable changes in the chemical components (15).

Extraction of the samples

Individual fresh leaves of male and female of each plant as well as fruits of them (100 g fresh wt.) were ground by a blinder. Each sample was macerated in pure methanol for 24 h. The samples were then extracted using a percolator. The extracted solutions (27 samples) were concentrated to dryness at 50°C under reduced pressure. The methanol extracts of leaves and fruits of each taxon were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity.

Isolation and Quantification of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins and tannins

The fruits and leaves of each plant (500 g) were dried at 50°C and then powdered separately. Each powder was defatted with petroleum ether (bp 40-60°C) using Soxhlet apparatus (6 h). The chemical components of defatted powders were extracted by maceration with methanol (four times). The methanol extracts were concentrated at reduced pressure and the presence of alkaloids (16), flavonoids (17), saponins (18) and tannins (19) were determined (Table 2).

Table 2.

Major components of fruits and leaves of Iranian conifers

Plant name Plant part Chemical components (average content)           a
Alkaloids Flavonoids Saponin Tannins
C. semipervirens var. horizontalis leaves 2+ 4+ 3+
C. semipervirens var. horizontalis fruits 1+ 4+ 4+
C. semipervirens var. semipervirens leaves 1+ 1+ 1+
C. semipervirens var. semipervirens fruits 1+ 2+
C. semipervirens cv. Cereifeormis leaves 3+ 1+ 3+
C. semipervirens cv. Cereifeormis fruits 2+ 1+ 4+
J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica leaves (male) 3+ 1+ 4+
J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica leaves (female) 3+ 1+ 4+
J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica fruits 1+ 4+ 1+
J. excelsa subsp. excelsa leaves 1+ 2+
J. excelsa subsp. excelsa fruits 2+ 1+ 1+
J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos leaves (male) 3+ 4+ 4+
J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos leaves (female) 3+ 1+ 2+
J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos fruits 2+ 1+ 2+
J. oblonga leaves (male) 3+ 1+ 4+
J. oblonga leaves (female) 3+ 1+ 4+
J. oblonga fruits 3+ 1+ 2+
J. foetidissima leaves (male) 4+ 3+
J. foetidissima leaves (female) 4+ 2+
J. foetidissima fruits 4+ 2+
J. sabina leaves (male) 3+ 2+
J. sabina leaves (female) 3+ 1+
J. sabina fruits
P. orientalis leaves 3+ 1+ 2+
P. orientalis fruits 2+ 3+
T. baccata leaves (male) 2+ 4+ 4+ 3+
T. baccata leaves (female) 3+ 2+ 3+
T. baccata fruits 1+ 4+

a: Average content was rated from - to 4+; +: slightly positive; ++: moderately positive; +++: strongly positive; ++++: very strongly positive; -: not detected.

Test organisms

The following microbial strains for testing purposes were purchased from the Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC): Escherichia coli PTCC 1330, Staphylococcus aureus PTCC 1337, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PTCC 1074, and Candida albicans PTCC 5027.

The negative and positive controls were respectively methanol and antibiotics containing discs (gentamycin 10 μg/disc and clotrimazole 8 μg/disc).

Hole diffusion method

This assay was performed using a suspension with 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity. Holes of 6 mm diameter were then made on the Mueller Hinton agar (Merck) plate (8 mm thick) inoculated by flooding and filled with 50 μL of methanol extract. The plates containing the bacteria and C. albicans were respectively incubated at 37°C and 25°C for 24 and 48 h. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the inhibition zone (IZ) around each hole. They were recorded as (-) for non-active samples and (+) for samples presenting IZ greater than 6 mm (the diameter of the hole) (20).

Cylinder plate diffusion test

This method is the same as hole diffusion test except that the filled cylinder containing 200 μL of different concentration of each extract used as the filled holes. The negative and positive controls were methanol and solutions of two antibiotics (gentamycin 0.2 μg/mL and clotrimazole 0.16 μg/mL), respectively (21).

Disc diffusion method

This assay was performed using the filter paper disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton and sabouraud dextrose agar respectively for bacteria and C. albicans. The plates were incubated under sterile conditions at 37°C for 24 h. Inoculums were prepared using a suspension with 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity and the culture was spread over the plates by means of a sterile cotton swab.

Plant extracts (0.25-2 mg/disc) were prepared and placed on plates earlier inoculated with microbial suspension. This was done to evaluate the sensitivity of the extracts at which microbial growth was inhibited effectively (22).

Agar well dilution test

Briefly, the methanol extracts (100, 50, 25 and 12.5 μg/mL) were diluted in molten Mueller Hinton agar (MHA, Merck) on 24 well plates. All bacterial strains were grown in Mueller Hinton broth (MHB, Merck) for 4 h at 37°C. Bacterial suspensions with 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity (≈108 cfu/mL), were prepared by dilution with Mueller Hinton broth. The diluted inoculums were added to a Steer’s replicator calibrated and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and 48 h at 25°C respectively for bacteria and C. albicans (23).

Results and Discussion

The antimicrobial activities of 27 methanol extracts of different parts of Iranian conifers were determined using four different methods. Screening was carried out at four different concentrations against S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans strains to examine the sensitivity against the mentioned micro-organism. Table 3 shows the most sensitive microbial strains in different methods.

Table 3.

Most sensitive microbial strains in different methods

Method C. albicans E. coli P. aeruginosa S. aureus
Disc diffusion _____ _____ J. excelsa subsp. excelsa leaf J. foetidissima male leaf
Hole plate difffusion J. excelsa subsp. excelsa fruit T. baccata male leaf C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis leaf C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis leaf
_____ _____ _____ _____
C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis leaf
C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriform fruit
J. excelsa subsp. excelsa leaf
J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos female leaf
J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos male leaf C. horizentalis leaf
J. excelsa subsp. excelsa leaf J. excelsa subsp. foetidissima female leaf J. communis. subsp. hemisphaerica female leaf
J. polycarpos male leaf J. excelsa subsp. foetidissima male leaf J. communis. subsp. hemisphaerica fruit
Cylinder agar dilution C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis leaf T. baccata female leaf J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos male leaf J. excelsa subsp. excelsa leaf
J. sabina female leaf J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos female leaf
J. sabina male leaf J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos male leaf
J. sabina fruit J. oblonga male leaf
T. baccata female leaf P. orientalis leaf
T. baccata male leaf

Determination of micro-organism sensitivity in diffusion methods

Table 4 shows the antimicrobial activity of Iranian connifer extracts (25, 50, 100 and 200 mg/mL) in three different methods. Methanol extracts exhibited only weak or no activity in cylinder agar diffusion method perhaps because of the low extracts diffusion in agar or may be the precipitation of insoluble material that inhibits further diffusion of active constituent.

Table 4.

Antimicrobial activity of Iranian connifer extracts for concentration of 25, 50, 100 and 200 g L-1 in three different methods.

Inhibition zone diameter (mm) Code/ plant extract
S. aureus P. aeruginosa E .coli C. albicans S. aureus
CAD HDP DDM CAD HDP DDM CAD d HDP c DDM b CAD HDP DDM Con. a
(-) 11.2±0.26 7±0.2f (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) e (-) (-) (-) 25 C 1
(-) 11.83±0.25 7.2±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 12.13±0.2 8.06±0.3 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.26±0.1 (-) 100
(-) 12.3±0.26 9.4±1.59 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.44±0.1 (-) 200
20.3±1.77 12.73±0.4 20.5±0.87 18.63±1.6 20.43±0.7 18.76±0.35 20.6±1.41 20.7±0.95 18.63±0.47 33.1 ±2.38 34.2±1.87 29.7±0.47 Pg
(-) 9.63 ±0.32 6.4 ±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 2
(-) 10.2 ±0.17 7.1 ±0.23 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.53 ±0.25 8.16 ±0.28 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 11.63 ±0.32 8.26 ±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 200
21.7±1.6 21.53 ±1.06 20.4 ±0.79 19±0.45 21.13 ±0.15 19.63 ±0.35 21.3±0.6 20.3 ±1.12 19.16 ±0.1 34.3±0.98 34.1 ±0.6 31 ±0.69 P
(-) 11 ±0.2 9.1 ±0.17 (-) 10.26 ±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 3
(-) 12.3 ±0.26 10.86 ±0.32 (-) 10.9 ±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 14.36 ±0.32 11.9 ±0.1 (-) 11.36 ±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 15.6 ±0.17 13.5 ±0.5 (-) 12.06 ±0.11 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.16 ±0.1 (-) 200
21.86±1.3 21.2 ±0.36 20.6 ±0.85 18.9±0.5 20.3 ±1 19.46 ±0.76 21.7±0.65 20.86 ±0.8 19.43 ±0.61 35.1 ±0.98 34.6 ±0.56 28.86 ±0.49 P
(-) 8.2 ±0.26 (-) (-) 7.43 ±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 4
(-) 9.33±0.35 6.86±0.5 (-) 7.83 ±0.49 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.16±0.2 8.23±0.32 (-) 9.13 ±0.56 6.8 ±0.4 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 10.9±0.45 10.03±0.25 (-) 10.16 ±0.15 8.86 ±0.32 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 200
21.6±2.3 21.23±0.92 19.8±0.36 19.46±0.7 20.53 ±0.86 18.66 ±0.6 21.46±0.86 20.76±0.9 18.63±0.32 34.8 ±8.5 28.4 ±1.41 30.43 ±0.94 p
(-) 12.86±0.2 6.4±0.1 (-) 10.33±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 5
(-) 13.63±0.51 7.23±0.25 (-) 11.4±0.26 (-) (-) (-) (-) )-( (-) (-) 50
(-) 14.86±0.73 9.7±0.32 (-) 11.96±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.3±0.1 (-) 100
(-) 15.83 ±0.49 11.83±0.35 (-) 13.4±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.5±0.1 (-) 200
22.6±1.9 12.2±0.5 20.16±0.5 21.53±0.6 20.83±0.25 20.1±1.13 21.5±0.45 20.1 ±1.3 19.46±0.7 34.8±0.88 34.73±0.45 30±1.21 P
(-) 11.16±0.15 7.3±0.2 (-) 7.43±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 6
(-) 12.36±0.35 8.3±0.1 (-) 8.4±0.26 (-) (-) )-( (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 14.3±0.15 9.33±0.2 (-) 9.1±0.1 (-) (-) )-( (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 14.3±0.1 11.76±0.25 (-) 10.63±0.15 (-) (-) )-( (-) (-) (-) (-) 200
22.4±20.2 22.06±0.35 20.2±0.45 19.1±0.9 20.06±0.81 20.5±0.65 20.4 ±0.34 20.5±0.65 19.46±0.93 35.3 ±0.7 33.86±0.25 29.7±1.41 P
(-) 10.13±0.23 7.26±0.25 (-) (-) 6.43±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 7
(-) 11.2±0.26 8.03±0.1 (-) (-) 7 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 12.13±0.23 9.03±0.1 (-) (-) 8.03±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.4±0.1 (-) 100
(-) 13.16±0.15 10.16±0.15 (-) (-) 10.16±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) 7.1±0.15 (-) 200
21.16±1.79
(-)
21.73±0.55
9.3±0.26
21.16±0.41
6.26±0.15
18.85±2.1
(-)
20.13±0.85
(-)
19.4±0.65
(-)
20.5 ±0.6
(-)
20.63±0.8
(-)
19.06±0.85
(-) e
35 ±1.6
(-)
34.7±0.36
(-)
30.06±0.68
(-)
P
25
C 8
(-) 9.43±0.23 7.1±0.17 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.16±0.2 7.8±0.34 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.56±0.2 (-) 100
(-) 12.4±0.69 9.1±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.9±0.15 (-) 200
19.23±0.51 22.3±0.55 20.36±0.45 19.6±0.45 20.16±0.727 19.16±0.15 19.9 ±0.98 20.06±0.56 19.06±0.98 36.7 ±2.8 34.3±0.41 29.06±0.23 P
(-) 8.83±0.28 6.2±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 9
(-) 9.56±0.1 6.73±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.46±0.15 7.03±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 11.06±0.1 7.16±0.28 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.93±0.1 (-) 200
21.36±1.02 21.53±0.66 20.63±0.65 19.2±0.75 19.43±0.25 19.23±1.02 21.43±1.8 20.7±1.21 19.96±0.25 34.7±1.49 34.3±0.68 29.83±0.15 P
(-) 10.26±0.25 7.3±0.55 (-) 7.76±0.25 7.03±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 10
(-) 11.16±0.28 7.8±034 (-) 8.23±0.23 7.2±0.2 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 11.93±0.1 9.1±0.17 (-) 10.03±0.2 8.3±0.57 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 13.33±0.28 10.4±0.2 (-) 11.5±0.1 9.7±0.26 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 200
21.1±1.015 20.76±0.9 20.6±0.75 19.3±0.3 20.36±0.45 20.1±0.26 19.5±1.56 19.76±0.45 18.76±0.35 34.86±1.06 34.8±0.7 30.5±0.8 P
(-) 11.3±0.26 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 8.03±0.1 (-) 25 C 11
(-) 12.1±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 8.8±0.1 (-) 50
(-) 12.43±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 9.2±0.25 (-) 100
(-) 13.1±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 8.83±0.1 (-) 200
20.26±1.05 21.6±1.3 20.6±1.13 19.1±0.75 20.8±0.45 19.4±0.87 21.6±1.65 20.5±1.04 20.05±0.3 33.8±1.85 35.1±0.55 29.6±1.42 p
(-) 12.13±0.15 7.2±0.34 (-) 7.2±0.34 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 12
(-) 12.2±0.17 8.16±0.28 (-) 8.16±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 12.4±0.36 9.5±0.66 (-) 8.8±0.53 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.76±0.25 (-) 100
(-) 13.8±0.32 10.43±0.51 (-) 10.33±0.3 (-) (-) 6.5±0.2 (-) (-) 7.06±0.11 (-) 200
17.7±1.85 21.6±0.62 20.3±0.65 18.76±2.5 19.93±0.41 18.73±0.49 20.6±0.35 19.7±0.45 19.06±0.65 34.96±1.53 34.4±1.08 30.3±07 P
(-) 10.46±0.15 8.06±0.1 (-) 8.13±0.23 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 13
(-) 12.9±0.17 8.26±0.25 (-) 10.56±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 14.3±0.3 11.13±0.9 (-) 12.16±0.32 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.83±0.15 (-) 100
(-) 14.4±0.2 11.43±1.25 (-) 11.56±0.15 6.4±0.1 (-) 6.5±0.2 (-) (-) 7.2±0.2 (-) 200
19.76±1.75 21.43±1.05 20.56±0.85 20.8±2.7 21±0.62 19.86±0.6 20.5±2.29 21.3±0.45 19.9±0.26 33.5±0.5 33.6±0.65 30.9±0.26 P
(-) 10.3±0.26 7 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 14
C 15
(-) 11.13±0.1 7.03±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 12.2±0.2 7 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 12.7±0.25 7.3±0.265 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.23±0.15 (-) 200
25±4.7
(-)
20.73±0.37
7.53±0.1
21.03±0.3
8.1±0.17
19.76±1.34
(-)
20.56±0.77
8.53±0.5
18.66±0.4
(-)
20.03±1.7
(-)
19.9±0.62
(-)
19.2±0.55
(-) e
33.1±3.2
(-)
34.56±0.77
(-)
29.2±0.43
(-)
P
25
(-) 8.5±0.1 9.1±0.15 (-) 9.1±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 11.43±0.58 11±0.5 (-) 9.86±0.98 (-) (-) 6.46 ±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 12.26±0.25 13.6±0.4 (-) 10.9±01.15 (-) (-) 6.96±0.1 (-) (-) 7.03±0.1 (-) 200
21.23±2.4 21.03±0.85 21.23±0.47 20.5±1.53 19.6±0.55 19.63±1.06 16.63±1.5 20.1±0.85 19.03±0.83 34.6±2.2 34.73±0.81 29.2±0.77 Pg
(-) 8.33±0.35 9.93±0.1 (-) 8.96±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 16
(-) 9.5±0.5 11.1±0.15 (-) 10.36±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 12.26±0.25 12.56±0.5 (-) 10.96±0.25 (-) (-) 8.6±0.2 (-) (-) 6.83±0.15 (-) 100
(-) 13.13±0.15 14.26±0.25 (-) 12.26±0.25 (-) (-) 8.83±0.28 (-) (-) 7±0.1 (-) 200
21.36±1.7 21.13±0.66 20.23±1 19.6±1.79 20.36±0.6 18.93±0.4 19.3±0.7 20.4±1.04 19.1±0.96 31.5±1 35.2±0.56 30±1.08 P
(-) 10.46±0.15 8.06±0.1 (-) 8.13±0.23 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 13
(-) 12.9±0.17 8.26±0.25 (-) 10.56±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 14.3±0.3 11.13±0.9 (-) 12.16±0.32 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.83±0.15 (-) 100
(-) 14.4±0.2 11.43±1.25 (-) 11.56±0.15 6.4±0.1 (-) 6.5±0.2 (-) (-) 7.2±0.2 (-) 200
19.76±1.75 21.43±1.05 20.56±0.85 20.8±2.7 21±0.62 19.86±0.6 20.5±2.29 21.3±0.45 19.9±0.26 33.5±0.5 33.6±0.65 30.9±0.26 P
(-) 9.73±0.64 7.1±0.17 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 17
(-) 11.3±0.26 7.36±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 13.23±0.2 8.26±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.76±0.1 (-) 100
(-) 14.2±0.34 8.33±0.28 (-) 6.9±0.11 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 7.3±0.1 (-) 200
24.9±6.8 21.76±1 20.26±0.8 18±1.2 20.6±0.17 20.43±1.06 19.93±3.03 20.1±0.32 19.9±0.45 35.3±2.7 34.4±0.96 30.1±1.17 p
(-) 10. 1±0.17 7.53±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 18
(-) 10.5±0.1 9.06±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.9±0.36 9.43±0.81 (-) 7.1±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 11.06±0.32 10.66±0.75 (-) 7.36±0.15 (-) (-) 7.1±0.17 (-) (-) 6.76±0.25 (-) 200
22.7±1.4 21.73±0.81 19.66±0.3 18.8±1.1 20.23±0.6 19.2±1.21 17.33±2.01 20.1±0.64 19.63±0.8 33.96±3.8 35.1±0.89 30.76±0.3 P
(-) 9.03±0.1 8.36±0.32 (-) 7.4±1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 19
(-)
(-)
9.5±0.1 9.3±0.2 (-) 8.2±0.2 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
9.96±0.15 9.8±0.28 (-) 9.03±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 10.26±0.25 10.26±0.25 (-) 7.9±0.15 (-) (-) 6.93±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) 200
21.6±0.8 21.4±1.03 20.23±0.9 17.6±2.08 21.06±0.4 19.8±0.62 19.1±1.3 20.53±0.92 20.06±0.25 34.1±3.8 35.6±0.1 29.8±0.15 P
(-) 8.6±0.2 (-) (-) 7.06±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 20
C 21
(-) 9.5±0.3 (-) (-) 7.46±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.26±0.25 7.03±0.1 (-) 8.03±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.46±0.15 (-) 100
(-) 10.66±0.15 8 (-) 8.5±0.1 (-) (-) 6.43±0.1 (-) (-) 7.03±0.15 (-) 200
22.4±1.49
(-)
21.4±1.3
8.6±0.65
20.9±0.67
7
16.7±1.97
(-)
20.83±0.2
7.3±0.1
19.46±0.58
(-)
20±1.87
(-)
20.1±0.26
(-)
20.4±0.2
(-) e
33.9±2.9
(-)
33.86±0.5
(-)
30.36±0.56
(-)
P
25
(-) 9.86±0.41 7.23±0.25 (-) 7.8±0.2 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 10.83±0.28 8.03±0.1 (-) 8.83±0.2 (-) (-) 6.5±0.15 (-) (-) 7.2±0.26 (-) 100
(-) 11.56±0.56 9.13±0.15 (-) 9.76±0.2 (-) (-) 7.5±0.3 (-) (-) 7.93±0.1 (-) 200
19.5±0.8 21.8±0.9 21.13±0.2 18.6±1.75 20.7±0.36 19.33±0.3 19.6 ±0.75 20.7±0.3 18.86±0.8 34.1±1.3 35.26±0.45 29.43±1.11 Pg
(-) 9.46±0.35 7.16±0.28 (-) 8.1±0.17 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 22
(-) 12.16±0.28 8.06±0.1 (-) 8.4±0.2 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 13.2±0.98 8.24±0.1 (-) 11.23±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.96±0.1 (-) 100
(-) 14.3±0.26 9.06±0.1 (-) 13.1±0.1 (-) (-) 6.76±0.2 (-) (-) 7.43±0.1 (-) 200
24.2±1.2 22.36±0.25 20.43±0.73 18.23±1.6 20.03±0.87 19.36±0.6 19.5±1.27 19.2±0.25 19.5±0.98 36.3±1.38 43.3±0.94 29.93±1.36 P
(-) 9.36±0.32 6.36±0.15 (-) 7±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 23
(-) 12.2±0.26 7.26±0.46 (-) 8.06±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 12.56±0.37 7.96±0.15 (-) 8.4±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.46± 0.15 (-) 100
(-) 13.16±0.28 8.26±0.3 (-) 10.6±0.3 (-) (-) 7.03±0.1 (-) (-) 7.06±0.11 (-) 200
20.5±0.8 22.36±0.25 20.16±0.6 19.53±1.71 20.83±0.75 19.06±0.82 18.9±3 19.7±0.79 19.73±0.68 35.6±3.36 34.8±0.26 29.96±0.58 P
(-) 10.4±0.36 7.1±0.17 (-) 6.46±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 7±0.1 (-) 25 C 24
(-) 10.5±0.43 7.3±0.3 (-) 7.13±0.11 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 7.7±0.26 (-) 50
(-) 12.06±0.3 8.13±0.15 (-) 7.5±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 9.06±0.1 (-) 100
(-) 12.8±0.52 8.6±0.15 (-) 8.2±0.2 (-) (-) 6.9±0.17 (-) (-) 9.43±0.2 (-) 200
23±2.28 21.46±0.65 20.4±0.3 20.3±3.45 20.33±0.65 19.73±0.85 20.23±1.87 19.53±0.49 20.23±0.41 35.5±3 33.86±0.3 28.6±0.63 p
(-) 7.96±0.1 7.06±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.26±0.1 (-) 25 C 25
(-) 9.3±0.2 8.16±0.15 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 6.5±0.1 (-) 50
(-) 11.9±0.36 8.5±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 7.4±0.4 (-) 100
(-) 12.96±0.45 9.06±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 8.1 ±0.37 (-) 200
22.9±1.21 21.5±0.65 20.36±0.65 17.93±2.3 19.83±0.1 20.3±0.25 20.93±1.36 20.4±0.53 19.5±0.63 35.9±6 34.6±0.92 29.6±0.55 P
(-) 7.26±0.25 7.06 (-) 7.4±0.52 (-) (-) 7.86±0.32 (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 26
(-) 8.56±0.51 8.16±0.1 (-) 8.5±0.55 (-) (-) 8.5±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 11.4±0.52 8.5±0.4 (-) 9.6±0.88 (-) (-) 9.03±0.25 (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 11.83±0.28 9.06±0.25 (-) 10.96±1.45 10.26±0.64 (-) 9.2±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) 200
21.1±1.4 20.63±0.25 20.36±0.47 18.96±1.4 20.53±0.4 19.53±0.4 19.5±1.5 20.36±0.92 18.83±0.2 33.3±4.9 34.23±1.3 30.5±0.75 P
(-) 6.83±0.28 (-) (-) 7.1±0.43 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 25 C 27
(-) 7.5±0.3 (-) (-) 7.26±0.25 (-) (-) 6.63±0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) 50
(-) 8.16±0.15 (-) (-) 8.8±0.62 (-) (-) 7.8±0.8 (-) (-) (-) (-) 100
(-) 9.5±0.5 7.1±0.1 (-) 11.23±0.1 (-) (-) 10.26±0.25 (-) (-) 6.3±0.1 (-) 200
22.06±0.4 21.7±0.65 20.6±0.45 18.26±2.12 20.5±0.75 18.73±0.7 20.4±3.2 20.4±0.5 18.56±0.25 33±3.1 35.2±0.4 29.23±1.01 P

a: Con = Concentration; b = DDM: Disc diffusion method; c : HDP = Hole plate difffusion; d : CAD = Cylinder agar diffusion; e: absence of inhibition zones; f: Inhibition zone ≥ 6 showed the antimicrobial activity; g: positive control; Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. C1 = C. semipervirens var. horizontalis leaf, C2 = C. semipervirens var. horizontalis fruit, C3 = C. sempervirens leaf, C4 = C. sempervirens fruit, C5 = C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis leaf, C6 = C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis fruit, C7 = J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica female leaf, C8 = J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica male leaf, C9 = J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica fruit, C10 = J. excelsa subsp. excels leaf, C11 = J. excelsa subsp. excelsa F, C12 = J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos female leaf, C13 = J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos male leaf, C14 = J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos fruit, C15 = J. foetidissima female leaf, C16 =J. foetidissima male leaf, C17 = J. foetidissima fruit, C18 = J. oblonga fL, C19 = J. oblonga male leaf, C20 = J. oblonga fruit, C21 = J. sabina female leaf, C22 =J. sabina male leaf, C23 = J. sabina fruit, C24 = P. orientalis leaf, C25 = P. orientalis fruit, C26 = T. baccata female leaf, C27 = T. baccata male leaf

In other methods, the extracts exhibited significant growth inhibition on S. aureus. In hole plate method, a weak antibacterial activity against E. coli was assessed whereas it showed complete resistance in disc diffusion method as C. albicans did. P. aeruginosa’s growth was inhibited 62% and 11.1% in hole plate and disc diffusion methods respectively. The extracts were 11.1% effective on C. albicans in hole plate assay.

The micro-organism sensitivity in low (25 μg/mL) and high (200 μg/mL) concentrations of extracts were differing in hole plate method as shown in Table 5.

Table 5.

Comparison of the micro-organism sensitivity in low (25 μg/mL) and high (200 μg/mL) concentrations in hole plate method

Extract concentration Sensitivity
(25 μg/mL) S. aureus < P. aeruginosa < C. albicans < E. coli
(200 μg/mL) S. aureus < C. albicans < P. aeruginosa < E. coli

MIC of each extracts as determined by agar diffusion method

The MIC exhibited by the Iranian conifer extracts against tested bacterial and fungal strains are given in Table 6. Obtained results revealed that the extracts are generally more active on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa whereas C. albicans and E. coli had higher MIC values.

Table 6.

Minimal inhibitory concentration (mg/mL) of the methanol extracts of different parts of Iranian conifer species with agar dilution test.

Plant extract Used part C. albicans E. coli P. aeruginosa S. aurus
C. sempervirens var. horizontalis leaf 100 50 12.5 0.39
fruit 50 50 25 0.78
C. sempervirens var. sempervirens leaf
fruit
50
25
100
50
25
25
1.56
1.56
C. sempervirens cv. Cereifeormis leaf
fruit
12.5
50
12.5
50
12.5
12.5
0.78
0.78
J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica female leaf
male leaf
50
50
50
50
25
25
0.39
0.78
fruit 50 50 25 0.39
J. excelsa subsp. excelsa leaf 12.5 25 12.5 0.39
fruit 50 100 25 0.78
J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos female leaf 25 50 12.5 0.39
male leaf
fruit
12.5
50
25
50
12.5
25
0.39
0.78
J. foetidissima female leaf
male leaf
25
25
50
50
12.5
12.5
0.78
0.78
fruit 25 50 25 0.78
J. oblonga female leaf 50 50 25 0.78
male leaf 25 50 12.5 0.39
fruit 50 100 25 3.12
J. sabina female leaf 50 50 12.5 0.78
male leaf 50 50 12.5 0.78
fruit 50 50 12.5 0.78
P. orientalis leaf 25 500 25 0.39
fruit 50 50 25 1.56
T. baccata female leaf 25 6.25 12.5 3.12
male leaf 50 12.5 12.5 3.12

MIC values in mg/mL of extracts and antibiotics. Gentamicin and clotrimazole used as positive controls

Antimicrobial effects of the investigated Cupressus species

All of the three tested cupressus taxa had antimicrobial properties against S. aurus. They have weak or no activity on other strains and this result, except for S. aurus, is in agreement with the literature. Alkofahi et al. and Guerin et al. (24, 25) reported that extracts of C. sempervirens: showed no activity against tested strains. The contradictory about S. aurus might be due to the extract concentrations, microbial strains or solvent used in our study. Methanol extracts had the most marked antimicrobial effects of all the tested species in different studies (26). C. sempervirens and C. sempervirens. cv. Cereiformis have been found to possess antimicrobial activities against P. aeroginosa in our study. It is believed that this effect shown by these taxa is due to the limitations discussed above. Essential oil of C. sempervirens was shown to be a potent inhibitor of S. aurus and P. aeroginosa, (27) therefore, the presence of essential oil constituent in extracts can be assumed. Since it is known that the leaves and fruits of cupressus species contain Camphen, Quercetin, Catechin, Linalool, Borneol and Sabinen, a part of the antimicrobial activities we investigated might be due to these constituents (28-30).

Antimicrobial effects of the investigated Juniperus species

As Dornberger et al. (31) had found antimicrobial properties in J. communis, and Muhammad et al. and Topcu et al. (32, 33) found evidence of antibacterial activity from the leaves and fruit of J. excelsa, it was not a surprise to find antimicrobial extracts among the Juniperus species investigated.

Methanol leaves and fruits extracts of all Juniperus species were effective against S. aureus by hole plat method. All of the Juniperus species leaves extracts were shown to be potent inhibitor of P. aeroginosa.

Extracts of J. communis subsp. hemisphaerica proved to be effective against C. albicans in high concentration with hole plate and among those, female leave extract revealed the greatest activity. The antibacterial effects against P. aeroginosa were only shown in the female leave extract by disc diffusion method.

Methanol fruits extract of J. excelsa were effective against C. albicans which have been investigated by Topcu et al. (33) previously.

The antibacterial activity against P. aeroginosa, which have been investigated earlier by H24107, was shown in the leave extract.

Except the fruits extract, the other parts of J. excelsa subsp. polycarpos were found to be effective against P. aeroginosa.

Methanol extracts of fruits and leaves of J. foetidissima and fruit and female leave of J. oblanga were effective against all of the tested microbes by hole plat method. A methanol extract of J. foetidissima and J. oblanga was added to the tested Juniperus extracts to inhibit the growth of E. coli.

Antimicrobial effects of the investigated Platycladus orientalis

Like other species, methanol extracts of leaves and fruits of P. orientalis were effective against S. aureus by hole plat method. The antimicrobial activities of methanol extracts of P. orientalis did not differ to a marked extent in hole plate method, and were all inhibitors of all the micro-organisms except for E. coli. Our antimicrobial results justify the Dornberger et al. findings (31). They were only effective against S. aureus in disc diffusion method.

Antimicrobial effects of the investigated Taxus baccata

Like what stated previously, methanol extracts of leaves and fruits of T. baccata were effective against S. aureus by hole plat method. Our finding about methanol extracts of T. baccata revealed that all of the microbial strains were sensitive except for C. albicans. By disc diffusion method, S. aureus was the only micro-organism that showed growth inhibition like that obtained with P. orientalis.

Minimum inhibitory concentration values of the extracts

Methanol extracts of the all taxa gave lowest MIC-values against S. aureus (< 3.12 mg/mL) compared to the other strains which had rather higher MIC-values. The reasons for the high MIC values could be that the extracts are mixtures of a large number of compounds and they might suppress the biological activities of each other, or that the active compound(s) is present in very low concentrations. Furthermore, plant extracts generally contain secondary metabolites like saponins, terpenoids and phenolics in a physiologically inactive glycoside form, and this may explain why some of the extracts did not produce very marked inhibition (34). Other reasons could be the slow diffusion of large molecules into the agar and masking detection of the full antimicrobial potential of the extract. This could be overcome by using the turbidimetric method, but there are several problems associated with this method while studying the bioactivities of crude extracts containing large molecules like tannins (35). One major problem is the formation of precipitation in tannin containing crude extracts, which makes it impossible to use turbidity as a measure of bacterial growth. This can be overcome by using INT (p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet) which is reduced to the red colored product formazan indicating bacterial growth (36).

Of the 27 extracts of four conifer species we investigated, the most antimicrobial potent one was a leaf extract in methanol of C. sempervirens. cv. Ceriformis which had the lowest MIC in comparison with other extract on four strains. Most of the tested plants showed the antimicrobial activity to some extent. It is possible that these essential oils from coniferous trees can be used as antibacterial and/or antifungal agents in food or other ingredients. The mechanism of antibacterial and antifungal effects of these extracted from coniferous trees needs to be further examined for potential uses.

These results indicate that the essential oils derived from coniferous trees, which have mild antimicrobial properties, can inhibit the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Research Affairs of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, the specialized Research fund for the Pharmacy Doctoral Program.

References

  • 1.Riedl H. Taxaceae. In: Rechinger KH, editor. Flora Iranica. No.12. Graz : Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt; 1965. pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Riedl H. Cupressucceae. In: Rechinger, K, editor. Flora Iranica. No.50. Graz: Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt; 1968. pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sabeti H. Forests Trees and Shrubs of Iran (in Persian) Tehran: Ministry of Information and Tourism Press; 1976. pp. 296–299. 415-425, 523-525, 741-743. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Emami SA, Asili J, Mohagheghi Z, Hassanzadeh MK. Antioxidant activity of leaves and fruits of Iranian conifers. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2007;4:313–319. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sadeghi-aliabadi H, Emami A, Sadeghi B, Jafarian A. In-vitro cytotoxicity of two subspecies of Juniperus excelsa on cancer cells. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2009;11:250–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sadeghi-aliabadi H, Emami SA, Saeidi M, Jafarian A. Cytotoxic Effects of the Extracts of Iranian Taxus baccata and Cupressus horizentalis on Cancer Cells. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2003;2:107–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sadeghi-aliabadi H, Emami A, Saidi M, Sadeghi B, Jafarian A. Evaluation of in-vitro cytotoxic effects of Juniperus foetidissima and Juniperus sabina extracts against a panel of cancer cells. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2009;8:281–286. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sadeghi-aliabadi H, Emami SA, Saeidi M, Jafarian A. Cytotoxic effects of the extracts of Iranian Taxus baccata and Cupressus horizentalis on cancer cells. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2003;2:107–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fyhrquist P, Mwasumbi L, Haeggstrom CA, Vuorela H, Hiltunen R, Vuorela P. Ethnobotanical and antimicrobial investigation on some species of Terminalia and Combretum Combretaceae growing in Tanzania. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002;79:169–177. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(01)00375-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Emami SA, Asili J, Rahimizadeh M, Fazli-Bazzaz BS, Hassanzadeh MK. Chemical and antimicrobial studies of Cupressus sempervirense L. and C. horizentalis Mill. essential oils. Iranian J. Pharm. Sci. 2006;2:103–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Emami SA, Hassanzadeh MK, Rahimizadeh M, Fazli-Bazzaz BS, Asili J. Chemical constituents of Cupressus sempervirens L. cv. Cereiformis Rehd. essential oils. Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005;1:33–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asili J, Emami SA, Rahimizadeh M, Fazli-Bazzaz BS, Hassanzadeh MK. Chemical and antimicrobial studies of Juniperus communis subsp hemisphaerica and Juniperus oblonga essential oils. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants. 2008;1:96–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Asili J, Emami SA, Rahimizadeh M, Fazli-Bazzaz BS, Hassanzadeh MK. Chemical and antimicrobial studies of Juniperus excelsa subsp excelsa and Juniperus excelsa subsp. polycarpos essential oils. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants. 2008;1:292–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hassanzadeh MK, Rahimizadeh M, Fazli-Bazzaz BS, Asili J, Emami SA. Chemical and antimicrobial studies of Platycladus orientalis essential oils. Pharm. Biol. 2001;39:388–390. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adams RP, Zanoni TA, Hogge L. The volatile leaf oils of Juniperus flaccida var. flaccida and var. poblana. J. Nat. Prod. 1984;47:1064–1065. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. 15th. ed. London : W.B. Saunders; 2002. pp. 138–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Markham RK. Techniques of Flavonoids Identification. London : Academic Press; 1982. p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hostettmann K, Martson A. Saponins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 233. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bruneton J. Pharmacognosie Phytochimie Plantes medicinales. Paris: TEC and DOC; 1999. pp. 381–385. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Villar A, Rios JL, Recio MC, Cortes D, Cavé A. Antimicrobial activity of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids II, Relation between chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. Planta Med. 1986;52:556–557. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-969371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mourey M, Mortier F, Mourey A. Activité antimicrobienne d›extraits de feuilles de Gingko biloba L. Plant. Méd. Phytothér. 2007;19:270–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mourey ML, Nag TN. Antimicrobial principles from in-vitro tissue culture of Peganum harmala. J. Nat. Prod. 1984;47:365–367. doi: 10.1021/np50032a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mitscher LA, Leu PR, Bathala MS, Wu WN, Beal JL. Antimicrobial agents from higher plants I: Introduction rationale and methodology. Lioydia. 1972;35:157–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alkofahi A, Batshoun R, Owais W, Najib N. Biological activity of some Jordanian medicinal plant extracts Part II. Fitoterapia. 1997;68:163–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guerin JC, Reveillere HP. Antifungal activity of plant extracts used in therapy I: Study of plant extracts against fungi species. Ann. Pharm. Fr. 1984;42:553–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.SahinF , Karaman I, Gullse M, Oğütçü H, Sengül M, Adigüzel A, Oztürk S, Kotan R. Evaluation of antimicrobial activities of Satureja hortensis L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003;87:61–65. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ross SA, El-Keltawi NE, Megalla SE. Antimicrobial activity of some Egyptian aromatic plants. Fitoterapia. 1980;51:201–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dovidson PM, Nadu AS. Phytophenols. In: Naidu AS, editor. Natural Food Antimicrobial Systems. Vol. 226. London: CRC Press; 2000. pp. 284–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Juneja LR Okubo T, Hung P. Catechins. In: Naidu AS, editor. Natural Food Antimicrobial Systems. London: CRC Press; 2000. pp. 390–391. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Naidu AS Bidlack WR, Crecelus AT. Flavonoids. In: Naidu AS, editor. Natural Food Antimicrobial Systems. London : CRC Press; 2000. pp. 328–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dornberger K, Lich H. Screening for antimicrobial and presumed cancerostatic plant metabolites. Pharmazie. 1982;37:215–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Muhammad I, Mossa JS, El-Feraly FS. Antibacterial diterpenes from the leaves and seeds of Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. Phytother. Res. 1992;6:261–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Topcu G, Erenler R, Çakmak O, Johansson CB, Çelik C, Chai HB, Pezzuto JM. Diterpenes from the berries of Juniperus excels. Phytochemistry. 1999;50:1195–1199. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00675-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Waage SK, Hedin PA. Quercetin-3-O-galactosyl-1→6 glucoside a compound from narrowleaf vetch with antibacterial activity. Phytochemistry. 1985;24:243–245. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barry AL, Thornsberry C. Susceptibility tests : diffusion test procedures. In: Balows A, Hausler WJ Jr, Hermann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1991. pp. 1117–1125. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eloff JN. On expressing the antibacterial activity of plant extracts - A small first step in applying scientific knowledge to rural primary health care. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2000;96:116–118. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR are provided here courtesy of Brieflands

RESOURCES