Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2013 Jun 6;15(12):2895–2897. doi: 10.1021/ol401013s

A Practical Method for the Synthesis of Highly Enantioenriched trans-1,2-Amino Alcohols

James A Birrell 1, Eric N Jacobsen 1,
PMCID: PMC3815482  NIHMSID: NIHMS490047  PMID: 23742206

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms490047u1.jpg

A highly enantioselective addition of phenyl carbamate to meso-epoxides has been developed to efficiently generate protected trans-1,2-amino alcohols. This transformation is promoted by an oligomeric (salen)Co–OTf catalyst and has been used to prepare two useful 2-aminocycloalkanol hydrochlorides in enantiopure formon a multigram scale from commercially-available starting materials.


Enantioenriched trans-1,2-amino alcohols are useful building blocks for the preparation of complex molecules and chiral catalysts as well as ligands and auxiliaries for asymmetric synthesis.1 Catalytic asymmetric approaches to synthesize this class of compounds have been developed, but their applicaton on a preparative scale has been limited.2 A chief concern in known methods is the use of hydrazoic acid as an ammonia equivalent,2a–b since this reagent is potentially dangerous and requires special safety measures. Bartoli has demonstrated that carbamates can be employed successfully in (salen)Co(III)-catalyzed kinetic resolutions of terminal epoxides.3 However, there are no known examples of enantioselective carbamate additions to meso epoxides, which are intrinsically much less reactive than terminal epoxides in (salen)Co(III)-catalyzed reactions.

Bimetallic mechanisms have been established for (salen)metal-catalyzed nucleophilic ring-opening of both terminal and meso-epoxides,4 and polymer-supported, dendrimeric, and oligomeric (salen)Co(III) complexes have been developed to facilitate cooperativity between metal centers.5 These multimeric complexes have been shown to display striking improvements in both rate and selectivity in relation to their monomeric equivalents.6 Herein we report the use of an oligomeric (salen)Co–OTf complex5e–f,7 to catalyze the highly enantioselective addition of phenyl carbamate to meso-epoxides (Scheme 1). This reaction enables an efficient, operationally-simple, and scaleable approach to protected trans-1,2-amino alcohols in high enantiomeric excess from commercially available starting materials.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Oligomeric (salen)Co(III)-Catalyzed Carbamate Addition to meso-Epoxides

In preliminary studies, we found that oligomeric (salen)Co–OTf complexes provide marked improvements in reactivity in the kinetic resolution of 1,2-epoxyhexane with tert-butyl carbamate.5f For example, only 0.2 mol % of the oligomeric complex 3 was needed to effectively catalyze this reaction whereas under similar conditions 4.4 mol % of a related monomeric (salen)Co(III) was required.3a

The addition of carbamates to cyclohexene oxide was selected as a model reaction, and it was found that phenyl carbamate was particularly effective as a nucleophlic reacting partner.8,9 Clean addition to cyclohexene oxide with subsequent intramolecular cyclization was observed to afford trans-4,5-disubstituted oxazolidinone product 1 (Table 1).10 The cyclization appears to be relatively rapid, as the initial addition intermediate is not detectable. While both monomeric and oligomeric (salen)Co–OTf complexes were found to catalyze this transformation, both the rate and enantioselectivity were far superior with the oligomeric catalyst 3 (entry 3). The best balance of rate and enantioselectivity was achieved in reactions carried out at 50 °C, with oxazolidinone 1 obtained in 91% yield and 95% ee after 24 h (entry 4).

Table 1.

Catalyst and Reaction Optimization

graphic file with name nihms490047u2.jpg
entrya catalyst (mol %) temperature (°C) yieldb (%) eec (%)
1 2 (5) 23 3 n.d.
2 2 (5) 50 33 21
3 3 (1) 23 21 97
4 3 (1) 50 91 95
a

Reactions run on a 0.5 mmol scale.

b

Yield determined by 1H NMR analysis relative to p-xylene as internal standard.

c

Enantiomeric excess determined by GC analysis using commercial chiral columns.

The addition of phenyl carbamate to a variety of meso-epoxides was evaluated under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 2). Epoxides with unsaturation in the ring were viable substrates, but underwent reaction with slower rates than cyclohexene oxide (entries 2–3). Carbamate addition to five-membered ring epoxide derivatives proceeded with very high enantioselectivity (entries 4–5). The products from these reactions did not undergo intramolecular cyclization, presumably due to the unfavorable strain in trans-fused 5–5 ring systems.11 Instead, the monomeric additon product was generated together with carbamate-bridged oligomers (Scheme 2). However, this mixture could be subjected to hydrolysis by treatment with base to liberate the trans-1,2-amino alcohol in high overall yield (see below).

Table 2.

Substrate Scope

graphic file with name nihms490047u3.jpg
entrya substrate product catalyst loading (mol %) time (h) yieldb (%) eec (%)
1 graphic file with name nihms490047t1.jpg graphic file with name nihms490047t2.jpg 1 24 94 96
2 graphic file with name nihms490047t3.jpg graphic file with name nihms490047t4.jpg 2 48 84 96
3 graphic file with name nihms490047t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms490047t6.jpg 2 48 63 95
4 graphic file with name nihms490047t7.jpg graphic file with name nihms490047t8.jpg 1 24 66 >99
5 graphic file with name nihms490047t9.jpg graphic file with name nihms490047t10.jpg 1 24 49 >99
a

Reactions run on a 1.0 mmol scale.

b

Isolated yield of purified product.

c

Enantiomeric excess determined by GC or HPLC analysis on commercial chiral columns.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

(salen)Co(III)-Catalyzed Carbamate Addition to Cyclopentene Oxide

The practical applicability of the carbamate addition protocol is illustrated in the preparation of trans-2-aminocyclohexanol hydrochloride (6) and trans-2-aminocyclopentanol hydrochloride (7) on a multigram scale using 0.5 and 1 mol % of catalyst, respectively (Scheme 3).12,13 Following the catalytic reaction, the reaction mixture was subjected to basic deprotection conditions and the products recrystallized as the hydrochloride salts in >99% ee. These amino alcohols are versatile building blocks for organic synthesis and can readily be transformed into a variety of valuable chiral products.13a, 14

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Preparative-Scale Reactions

In summary, we have developed an efficient protocol for the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of protected trans-1,2-amino alcohols in high yield and enantiomeric excess. Crucial to this development was the use of an oligomeric (salen)Co–OTf complex as the catalyst and aryl carbamate nucleophiles. This method is amenable to large-scale synthesis due to the low catalyst loadings and high concentration used, its operational simplicity, and the use of inexpensive, commercially-availalable starting materials.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH (GM-43214).

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available Complete experimental procedures and characterization data, 1H and 13C NMR spectra, GC and HPLC traces of racemic and enantioenriched protected trans-1,2-amino alcohol and 2-aminocycloalkanol hydrochloride products, data comparing the reaction rates of electronically substituted carbamates.

References

  • 1.(a) Ager DJ, Prakash I, Schaad DR. Chem Rev. 1996;96:835–876. doi: 10.1021/cr9500038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fache F, Schulz E, Tommasino ML, Lemaire M. Chem Rev. 2000;100:2159–2231. doi: 10.1021/cr9902897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bergmeier SC. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:2561–2576. [Google Scholar]; (d) Anaya de Parrodi C, Juaristi E. Synlett. 2006:2699–2715. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Nugent WA. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:2768–2769. [Google Scholar]; (b) Martínez LE, Leighton JL, Carsten DH, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:5897–5898. [Google Scholar]; (c) Schneider C, Sreekanth AR, Mai E. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:5691–5694. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Carrée F, Gil R, Collin J. Org Lett. 2005;7:1023–1026. doi: 10.1021/ol0475360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Arai K, Salter MM, Yamashita Y, Kobayashi S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:955–957. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Bartoli G, Bosco M, Carlone A, Locatelli M, Melchiorre P, Sambri L. Org Lett. 2004;6:3973–3975. doi: 10.1021/ol048322l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bartoli G, Bosco M, Carlone A, Locatelli M, Melchiorre P, Sambri L. Org Lett. 2005;7:1983–1985. doi: 10.1021/ol050675c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Hansen KB, Leighton JL, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:10924–10925. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nielsen LPC, Stevenson CP, Blackmond DG, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:1360–1362. doi: 10.1021/ja038590z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Annis DA, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:4147–4154. [Google Scholar]; (b) Breinbauer R, Jacobsen EN. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:3604–3607. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20001016)39:20<3604::aid-anie3604>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ready JM, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:2687–2688. doi: 10.1021/ja005867b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ready JM, Jacobsen EN. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:1374–1377. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020415)41:8<1374::aid-anie1374>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) White DE, Jacobsen EN. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2003;14:3633–3638. [Google Scholar]; (f) White DE. PhD Thesis. Harvard University; Cambridge, Massachusetts: 2005. [Google Scholar]; (g) Zheng X, Jones CW, Weck M. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:1105–1112. doi: 10.1021/ja0641406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Madhavan N, Jones CW, Weck M. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1153–1165. doi: 10.1021/ar800081y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Thomas RM, Widger PCB, Ahmed SM, Jeske RC, Hirahata W, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:16520–16525. doi: 10.1021/ja1058422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Haak RM, Wezenberg SJ, Kleij AW. Chem Commun. 2010;46:2713–2723. doi: 10.1039/c001392g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For an example in the context of enantioselective intramolecular openings of oxetanes, see: Loy RN, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2786–2787. doi: 10.1021/ja809176m.
  • 7.For applications of this catalyst in total synthesis, see: Chae J, Buchwald SL. J Org Chem. 2004;69:3336–3339. doi: 10.1021/jo035819k.Snider BB, Zhou J. Org Lett. 2006;8:1283–1286. doi: 10.1021/ol052948+.Adachi M, Zhang Y, Leimkuhler C, Sun B, LaTour JV, Kahne DE. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:14012–14013. doi: 10.1021/ja065905c.McGowan MA, Stevenson CP, Schiffler MA, Jacobsen EN. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:6147–6150. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002177.Rajapaksa NS, McGowan MA, Rienzo M, Jacobsen EN. Org Lett. 2013;15:706–709. doi: 10.1021/ol400046n.
  • 8.Aryl carbamates are uniquely effective nucleophiles in this transformation; tert-butyl carbamate, methyl carbamate, benzyl carbamate, S-phenyl thiocarbamate, acetamide, trifluoroacetamide, or trichloroacetamide all proved unreactive.
  • 9.A correlation between reaction rate and the electronics of a series of substituted aryl carbamates was observed, with electron-deficient carbamates proceeding most rapidly. For a comparison of the reaction rates of electronically substituted carbamates, see the Supporting Information.
  • 10.For a (salen)Al-catalyzed method for the synthesis of cis-4,5-disubstituted oxazolidinones from epoxides and isocyanates, see: Baronsky T, Beattie C, Harrington RW, Irfan R, North M, Osende JG, Young C. ACS Catal. 2013;3:790–797.
  • 11.(a) Chang S, McNally D, Shary-Tehrany S, Hickey MJ, Boyd RH. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92:3109–3118. [Google Scholar]; (b) Allinger NL, Tribble MT, Miller MA, Wertz DH. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93:1637–1648. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Compounds 6 and 7 were also prepared on a 10 mmol scale without a recrystallization step, providing the following results: 6 (1.4 g, 91% yield, 94% ee); 7 (1.2 g, 86% yield, 98% ee). The difference in yields between the 10 and 100 mmol-scale reactions is a result of the recrystallization procedure.
  • 13.For classical resolution approaches to these compounds, see: Schiffers I, Rantanen T, Schmidt F, Bergmans W, Zani L, Bolm C. J Org Chem. 2006;71:2320–2331. doi: 10.1021/jo052433w.Schiffers I, Bolm C. Org Synth. 2008;85:106–117.For an alternative method, see: Overman LE, Sugai S. J Org Chem. 1985;50:4154–4155.
  • 14.Schaus SE, Larrow JF, Jacobsen EN. J Org Chem. 1997;62:4197–4199. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES