Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Respir Med. 2013 Aug 21;107(10):10.1016/j.rmed.2013.07.024. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.07.024

SEX DIFFERENCES IN ASTHMA SYMPTOM 1 PROFILES AND CONTROL IN THE AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ASTHMA CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTERS

Jennifer W McCallister 1, Janet T Holbrook 2, Christine Y Wei 2, Jonathan P Parsons 1, Cathy G Benninger 1, Anne E Dixon 3, Lynn B Gerald 4, John G Mastronarde 1; for the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers
PMCID: PMC3816372  NIHMSID: NIHMS518098  PMID: 23972381

Abstract

Objective

Important differences between men and women with asthma have been demonstrated, with women describing more symptoms and worse asthma-related quality of life (QOL) despite having similar or better pulmonary function. While current guidelines focus heavily on assessing asthma control, they lack information about whether sex-specific approaches to asthma assessment should be considered. We sought to determine if sex differences in asthma control or symptom profiles exist in the well-characterized population of participants in the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers (ALA-ACRC) trials.

Methods

We reviewed baseline data from four trials published by the ALA-ACRC to evaluate individual item responses to three standardized asthma questionnaires: the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), the multi-attribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI), and Juniper Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ).

Results

In the poorly-controlled population, women reported similar overall asthma control (mean ACQ 1.9 vs. 1.8; p=0.54), but were more likely to report specific symptoms such as nocturnal awakenings, activity limitations, and shortness of breath on individual item responses. Women reported worse asthma-related QOL on the mini-AQLQ (mean 4.5 vs. 4.9; p<0.001) and more asthma-related symptoms with a lower mean score on the ASUI (0.73 vs. 0.77; p=<0.0001) and were more likely to report feeling bothered by particular symptoms such as coughing, or environmental triggers.

Conclusions

In participants with poorly-controlled asthma, women had outwardly similar asthma control, but had unique symptom profiles on detailed item analyses which were evident on evaluation of three standardized asthma questionnaires.

INTRODUCTION

Population studies reveal sex-related differences in asthma that change with age. In children and early adolescents, asthma is more common in boys 13. After puberty, asthma becomes more common and more severe in women. Women with asthma describe more symptoms and worse quality of life (QOL) than men despite having comparable or better pulmonary function 47. Similarly, women with asthma report greater healthcare utilization 46 and more frequent use of short acting beta-agonists (SABA) 57 than men. While the reasons for these observed sex-related differences in asthma morbidity and disease expression have not been fully explained, differences in perception of air flow obstruction 5,8, increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness in women as a result of increased susceptibility to tobacco smoke 910, and hormonal influences 1113 have all been proposed as potential hypotheses.

Sex specific treatment approaches to asthma care have been developed, and have shown benefit to women when compared to standard nonspecific approaches 1415. Despite these findings, current asthma guidelines 16 lack information about whether sex-specific approaches to asthma assessment should be considered. Using detailed evaluation of previously validated questionnaires, we sought to determine if sex differences in asthma control or symptom profiles exist in the population of participants in the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers (ALA-ACRC) trials, supporting the need for sex-specific approaches to asthma assessment. Some of the results have been reported previously in the form of an abstract 17. By examining commonly utilized questionnaires in this manner, the ALA-ACRC data offer a unique approach to the evaluation of the potential influence of sex on the assessment of asthma morbidity and quality of life, and take advantage of a large well characterized population of participants.

METHODS

Study design and participants

The ALA-ACRC is a multi-center network of 20 centers dedicated to improving asthma care through clinical research in diverse populations. We evaluated data collected at enrollment from four published trials 1821 by the ALA-ACRC to evaluate item responses of men and women to three standardized asthma questionnaires. A detailed description of the design and inclusion/exclusion criteria for each study is provided elsewhere 1821.

The analyses included one trial of participants with well-controlled asthma (the Leukotriene or Corticosteroid or Corticosteroid-Salmeterol [LOCCS] trial 20) and three trials of participants with poorly-controlled asthma (Effectiveness of Low Dose Theophylline as Add-On Therapy In Treatment of Asthma [LODO]18, Study of Acid Reflux and Asthma [SARA]19, and the Trial of Asthma Patient Education [TAPE]21) as determined by criteria for study enrollment. Eligibility criteria for each trial are included in the online supplement (Appendix). Participants 17 years of age or older were included.

Demographic and clinical assessments

Data were obtained from the baseline assessments of participants prior to the initiation of study interventions. Demographic and clinical data including targeted co-morbid conditions were evaluated.

Sex-specific item analysis of standard asthma questionnaires

Asthma control was assessed with the seven-question Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 22 (range, 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating less severe asthma and 0.5 units considered a minimal clinically important difference [MID] 23, with scores ≥1.5 defined as poor control). Asthma symptoms were evaluated with the multi-attribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) 24 (range, 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating less severe asthma and 0.09 considered a MID 25). Asthma-related QOL was assessed with the Juniper Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ) 26 (range, 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better QOL and 0.5 considered the MID) 19. We examined overall scores and individual item responses for sex-related differences in controlled versus poorly-controlled asthmatics.

Statistical analysis

Data from participants enrolled in more than one trial were included only from the latest trial in which the participant enrolled. Analyses were stratified by control status (controlled vs. poorly-controlled) as defined by the criteria required for trial eligibility 1821. For continuous variables, analyses were adjusted for trial, and as specified, other characteristics using linear regression models; non-adjusted analyses were based on Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests. For categorical variables, unadjusted analyses were performed using Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact Tests; analyses including covariate adjustments were performed with logistic regression models. For analysis of specific questionnaire items, responses were categorized by presence or absence of the symptom. Analyses were performed in SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics

We reviewed baseline data of 1612 participants (287 well-controlled asthmatics from LOCCS and 1325 poorly-controlled asthmatics from LODO [n=412], TAPE [n=514], and SARA [n=399] respectively). Ages ranged from 17–85, and the majority (70%) was women. Participants were stratified by asthma control and further compared by sex using baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (Tables 1A and 1B).

Table 1.

A: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of well-controlled asthma population
Women
N=181(63%)
Men
N=106(37%)
P-value
Demographic and clinical characteristics
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD)
Age in years 181 35.7(13.2) 106 33.6(11.2) 0.36
Race N % N %
  White 126 70 71 67 0.17
  Black 44 24 22 21
  Other 11 6 13 12
Hispanic
  Yes 14 8 10 9 0.62
  No 167 92 96 91
Smoking status
  Current 12 7 7 7 0.69
  Former 40 22 19 18
  Never 129 71 80 75
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD)
BMI (kg/m2) 181 28.7(7.6) 106 27.7(5.7) 0.85
Other self-reported conditions N % N %
  GERD 46 25 22 21 0.37
  Eczema 27 15 12 11 0.39
  Chronic sinusitis 65 36 19 18 0.001
  Food allergies 49 27 21 20 0.17
  Allergic rhinitis 110 61 62 58 0.70
Asthma characteristics
  Asthma exacerbation in prior year 60 33 27 25 0.17
  Allergies reported trigger for asthma 149 82 90 85 0.57
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD)
  Age of asthma diagnosis in years 177 17.0 (15.0) 104 15.1 (15.1) 0.18
Pulmonary function
  Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted 181 92.4 (10.7) 106 89.4 (9.4) <0.01
  Post-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted 180 97.6 (11.4) 103 95.9 (11.2) 0.13
  % change FEV1 180 5.6 (5.9) 103 7.4 (6.8) 0.06
  Pre-bronchodilator FVC% predicted 181 100.3 (12.5) 106 99.8 (12.8) 0.81
  Post-bronchodilator FVC% predicted 180 101.6 (14.2) 103 100.2 (13.7) 0.62
  % change FVC 180 1.3 (9.1) 103 0.6 (5.6) 0.47
  PC20 methacholine (mg/dL) 35 3.7 (3.6) 23 3.7 (4.2) 0.82
Chronic asthma medications N % N %
  Inhaled SABA 120 66 71 67 0.91
  ICS 38 21 27 25 0.38
  LABA 13 7 4 4 0.31
  LABA/ICS 68 38 28 26 0.05
  Leukotriene modifiers 30 17 10 9 0.09
  Inhaled anticholinergics 4 2 0 0 0.30
  Cromolyn sodium or nedocromil 5 3 1 1 0.42
  Oral beta-agonists 1 1 0 0 >.99
  Methylxanthines 1 1 0 0 >.99
  Oral corticosteroids 0 0 1 1 0.37
  Herbal or natural supplements 32 18 9 8 0.03
B: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of poorly-controlled asthma population
Women
N=953(72%)
Men
N=372 (28%)
P-value*
Demographic and clinical characteristics
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD)
Age in years 953 40.9(13.8) 372 39.6(14.2) 0.09
Race N % N %
  White 563 59 217 58 0.62
  Black 316 33 120 32
  Other 74 8 35 9
Hispanic
  Yes 81 9 29 8 0.68
  No 872 92 343 92
Smoking status
  Current 51 5 20 5 0.18
  Former 336 35 151 41
  Never 566 59 201 54
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD)
BMI (kg/m2) 951 31.4(8.7) 371 28.7(6.1) <.0001
Other self-reported conditions N % N %
  GERD 248 26 76 20 0.03
  Eczema 111 17 31 12 0.04
  Chronic sinusitis 422 44 107 29 <.0001
  Food allergies 138 21 54 20 0.73
  Allergic rhinitis 626 66 230 62 0.19
Asthma characteristics
  Asthma exacerbation in prior year 440 46 134 36 <0.001
  Allergies reported trigger for asthma 791 83 286 77 0.01
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD)
  Age of asthma diagnosis in years 933 19.1(16.6) 365 16.4(16.9) <0.001
Pulmonary function
  Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted 953 82.5(15.4) 371 78.0(16.3) <.0001
  Post-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted 948 89.1(15.0) 370 85.2(15.5) <.0001
  % change FEV1 948 9.0(11.2) 370 10.4(14.3) <0.01
  Pre-bronchodilator FVC% predicted 952 89.9(14.5) 371 90.5(15.9) 0.35
  Post-bronchodilator FVC% predicted 948 93.5(14.7) 370 95.0()14.5 0.03
  % change FVC 948 4.5(9.5) 370 5.9(11.7) 0.01
  PC20 methacholine (mg/dL) 128 3.3(4.3) 47 3.3(4.1) 0.82
Chronic asthma medications N % N %
  Inhaled SABA 779 82 323 87 0.03
  ICS 265 28 112 30 0.40
  LABA 90 9 36 10 0.90
  LABA/ICS 550 58 201 54 0.24
  Leukotriene modifiers 109 11 32 9 0.14
  Inhaled anticholinergics 26 3 7 2 0.37
  Cromolyn sodium or nedocromil 5 1 4 1 0.28
  Oral beta-agonists 4 <1 1 <1 >0.99
  Methylxanthines 3 <1 3 1 0.36
  Oral corticosteroids 17 2 2 1 0.12
  Herbal or natural supplements 86 13 28 11 0.25

SD = standard deviation; BMI = body mass index; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC = forced vital capacity; PC20 = provocative concentration of methacholine; SABA = short-acting beta-agonist; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LABA = long-acting beta-agonist

Among poorly-controlled participants, men were diagnosed with asthma at an earlier age (16.4 ± 16.9 vs. 19.4 ± 16.6 years; p<0.001), and had a lower BMI (28.7 ± 6.1 vs. 31.4 ± 8.7 kg/m2; p<0.001). Men reported more frequent use of SABA and had a lower mean % predicted post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (85.2 ± 15.5 vs. 89.1 ± 15.0; p<0.01) but no difference in bronchial hyper-responsiveness as defined by methacholine challenge. Women were more likely to report concomitant gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (26% vs. 20%; p=0.03), eczema (17% vs. 12%; p=0.04), and sinusitis (44% vs. 29%; p<0.001), and were more likely to report allergy-exacerbated asthma symptoms (83% vs. 77%; p=0.01) or treatment for an exacerbation in the last year (46% vs. 36%; p<0.001).

For controlled subjects, there were few differences noted between men and women. Men had a lower mean % predicted pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (89.4 ± 9.4 vs. 92.4 ± 10.7; p<0.01), and women were more likely to report concomitant sinusitis (36% vs. 18%; p=0.001).

Item responses to asthma questionnaires

In the poorly-controlled population, women reported similar overall asthma control (mean ACQ 1.9 vs. 1.8; p=0.54), but were more likely to report frequent nocturnal awakenings, more limitations in activities, and more shortness of breath related to their asthma (Table 2) than men on individual item responses. Women also reported worse asthma-related QOL on the mini-AQLQ (mean 4.5 vs. 4.9; p<0.001 respectively) (Table 3) where they were more likely to report feeling bothered by symptoms such as coughing (72% vs. 60%; p<0.001), or environmental triggers for asthma such as dust (85% vs. 73%; p<0.001), cigarette smoke (81% vs. 68%; p<0.001), and weather and air pollution (66% vs. 47%; p<0.0001), and were more likely to report limitations with activities. They were also more likely to report difficulty sleeping related to their asthma (57% vs. 48%; p=0.01). After adjusting for the increased frequency of co-morbid conditions in women, differences in reported shortness of breath noted on the ACQ and reports of interference with sleep or social activities on the mini-AQLQ were no longer significant. However, the rest of the item responses evaluated were unaffected.

Table 2.

Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) responses for poorly-controlled subjects

Women
N=952 (72%)
Men
N=372 (28%)
Mean SD 95% CI Mean SD 95% CI p p*
ACQ7 1.9 0.8 1.9,2.0 1.8 0.8 1.8,1.9 .54 0.36

Woken by asthma
past week?
1.5 1.3 1.4,1.6 1.3 1.2 1.1,1.4 <0.01 0.02

How bad were
symptoms?
1.9 1.1 1.9,2.0 1.8 1.1 1.7,1.9 0.08 0.11

How limited in
activities?
1.8 1.2 1.7,1.9 1.5 1.2 1.4,1.6 0.001 0.02

How much shortness
of breath did you
experience?
2.5 1.1 2.4,2.5 2.3 1.1 2.1,2.4 0.03 0.07

How much time did
you wheeze?
2.0 1.3 1.9,2.1 1.9 1.2 1.8,2.0 0.89 0.68

How many puffs of
short-acting
bronchodilator each
day?
1.5 1.0 1.5,1.6 1.5 1.1 1.4,1.6 0.91 0.75

Individual item responses were analyzed by sex of respondent, and describe the preceding seven days.

ACQ7 = seven question asthma control questionnaire; SD = standard deviation; CI = 95% confidence interval; FEV1= forced expiratory volume in one second;

p = p-value adjusted for trial, age, race and body mass index.

p* = p-value adjusted for trial, age, race, body mass index, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eczema, sinusitis, and rhinitis.

Table 3.

Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) in poorly controlled subjects.

Women Men
Mean(SD) Median Mean(SD) Median p p*
AQLQ Score 4.5(1.2) 4.5 4.9(1.1) 5.0 <.0001 0.001

Women % Men %

Feel short of breath as a
result of your asthma?
No time 148 16% 76 20% 0.08 0.20
Any time 804 84% 296 80%

Feel bothered by or have
to avoid dust in the
environment?
No time 139 15% 100 27% <0.0001 <0.0001
Any time 813 85% 272 73%

Feel frustrated as a result
of your asthma?
No time 340 36% 147 40% 0.44 0.94
Any time 612 64% 225 60%

Feel bothered by
coughing?
No time 264 28% 149 40% <0.001 0.01
Any time 688 72% 223 60%

Feel afraid of not having
your asthma medication?
No time 431 45% 151 41% 0.09 0.04
Any time 521 55% 221 59%

Experience a feeling of
chest tightness or chest
heaviness?
No time 245 26% 113 30% 0.11 0.86
Any time 707 74% 259 70%

Feel bothered by or have
to avoid cigarette smoke
in the environment?
No time 180 19% 118 32% <0.0001 <0.001
Any time 772 81% 254 68%

Have difficulty getting a
good night's sleep as a
result of your asthma?
No time 406 43% 193 52% 0.01 0.10
Any time 546 57% 179 48%

Feel concerned about
having asthma?
No time 343 36% 140 38% 0.98 0.58
Any time 609 64% 232 62%

Experience a wheeze in
your chest?
No time 276 29% 119 32% 0.62 0.68
Any time 676 71% 253 68%

Feel bothered by or have
to avoid going outside
because of weather or air
pollution?
No time 327 34% 198 53% <0.0001 <0.001
Any time 625 66% 174 47%

Limitations with
strenuous activities?
No time 235 25% 139 37% <0.001 <0.01
Any time 717 75% 233 63%

Limitations with
moderate activities?
No time 400 42% 228 61% <.0001 <0.001
Any time 552 58% 144 39%

Limitations with social
activities?
No time 644 68% 282 76% 0.04 0.06
Any time 308 32% 90 24%

Limitations with workrelated
activities?
No time 631 66% 270 73% 0.17 0.46
Any time 321 34% 102 27%

Individual item responses were analyzed by sex of respondent, and describe the preceding two weeks.

p=p-value adjusted for age, race, and body mass index.

p*= p-value adjusted for trial, age, race, body mass index, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eczema, sinusitis, and rhinitis. SD = standard deviation

Among participants with poorly-controlled asthma, women reported more asthma-related symptoms with a lower mean score on the ASUI (0.73 vs. 0.77; p=<0.0001) (Table 4). Compared to men, women were more likely to report feeling bothered by coughing (80% vs. 67%; p<0.001), were more likely to describe symptoms such as coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath as moderate or severe (p<0.001, p=0.03, and p<0.01 respectively), and were more likely to report nocturnal asthma symptoms (62% vs. 50%; p<0.001). After adjusting for the increased frequency of co-morbid conditions in women, severity of wheezing and shortness of breath were no longer significant but the other item responses were not affected.

Table 4.

Asthma symptom utility index (ASUI) in poorly-controlled subjects

Women (n= 953, 72%) Men (n= 372, 28%)

Mean(SD) Median Mean(SD) Median P p*
ASUI Score 0.73(0.16) 0.75 0.77(0.14) 0.80 <.0001 <0.01

Women % Men %
How many days
were you
bothered by
coughing?
Not at all 189 20% 121 33% <.0001 <0.001
Others 764 80% 251 67%

On average, how
severe was your
cough?
Mild 452 59% 181 72% <0.001 0.01
Moderate 277 36% 61 24%
Severe 35 5% 9 4%

How many days
were you
bothered by
wheezing?
Not at all 210 22% 72 19% 0.11 0.33
others 743 78% 300 81%

On average, how
severe was your
wheezing?
Mild 497 67% 226 75% 0.03 0.08
Moderate 230 31% 70 23%
Severe 16 2% 4 1%

How many days
were you
bothered by
shortness of
breath?
Not at all 79 8% 38 10% 0.47 0.83
others 874 92% 334 90%

On average, how
severe was your
shortness of
breath?
Mild 522 60% 235 70% <0.01 0.12
Moderate 326 37% 94 28%
Severe 26 3% 5 2%

How many days
were you
awakened at
night by your
asthma?
Not at all 364 38% 186 50% <0.001 0.001
Others 589 62% 186 50%

On average, how
much of a
problem was
being awakened
at night?
Mild 368 62% 127 68% 0.12 0.10
Moderate 199 34% 54 29%
Severe 22 4% 5 3%

How many days
were you
bothered by side
effects of asthma
medications?
Not at all 756 79% 318 85% <0.01 <0.01
Others 197 21% 54 15%

On average, how
severe were the
side effects?
Mild 140 71% 36 67% 0.78 0.56
Moderate 53 27% 18 33%
Severe 4 2% 0 0%

Individual item responses were analyzed by sex of respondent, and describe the preceding two weeks.

p= pvalue adjusted for trial, age, race, and body mass index.

p* = p-value adjusted for trial, age, race, body mass index, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eczema, sinusitis, and rhinitis SD = standard deviation.

Similar analyses in the controlled population revealed few differences between men and women. The mean score on the ACQ was similar for men and women (0.7 vs. 0.7; p=0.53) and there were no significant differences noted on sex-specific analyses of the individual item responses (data not shown). Men and women also reported similar asthma-related QOL on the mini-AQLQ with mean scores of 5.9 and 5.7 (p=0.09) respectively. For the individual item responses, women were more likely to report feeling bothered by cigarette smoke (69% vs. 49%; p<0.01) or by weather and air pollution (36% vs. 21%; p=0.02), but there were otherwise no differences noted (data not shown). For the ASUI, women reported more overall asthma-related symptoms with a lower mean score of 0.87 vs. 0.90 (p=0.04), and were more likely to report being bothered by cough (46% vs. 33%; p=0.04). Otherwise, there were no significant differences noted. When adjusted for the presence of co-morbid conditions, there was no effect on the differences noted for individual item responses noted on the AQLQ, but there was no longer a statistical difference noted between men and women who reported coughing in the preceding two weeks on the ASUI (p=0.06).

DISCUSSION

The ALA-ACRC trials provide data on a group of well-characterized participants with asthma. The current analysis focuses on sex-related differences in a subgroup of participants 17 years of age or older enrolled in four clinical trials. Results showed that in participants with poorly-controlled asthma, women had outwardly similar asthma control as measured by the mean score on the seven-question ACQ, but reported more asthma symptoms and poorer asthma-related QOL, compared to men despite having better pulmonary function and similar baseline asthma medications. Interestingly, men reported more frequent use of SABA despite reporting less frequent asthma symptoms, suggesting that men may tend to under-report their asthma symptoms. Although the mean differences noted between poorly-controlled men and women on the ASUI and mini-AQLQ were statistically significant, they did not achieve the MID which has previously been described as important19,25, initially suggesting that there were no important sex differences in asthma symptoms or QOL. However, our data suggest there are sex-related differences for a subset of asthma symptoms that may be disguised when looking at overall scores. The subset of symptoms for which there were notable significant differences included nocturnal awakenings and limitation in activities, which are likely to influence QOL and resultant responses on QOL assessments. These sex-related differences in asthma symptom expression became much less evident in the setting of well-controlled disease.

Previous studies have demonstrated differences between the sexes in asthma symptoms and control 47,27. Survey data has shown that women report worse asthma control and greater healthcare utilization 6 despite noting more frequent use of controller medications 27. In addition, women frequently report worse asthma-related quality of life despite demonstrating better pulmonary function 45,7,28. In a cluster analysis of the Severe Asthma Research Program, Moore and colleagues described five distinct asthma phenotypes 29 including a group of primarily women with frequent co-morbid conditions and symptoms out of proportion to documented airflow obstruction. This phenotype bears a striking resemblance to the adult women with poorly-controlled asthma in the current study.

The data presented here extend the current understanding of the differences between adult men and women with asthma; we present an objectively characterized group of asthmatics, using a combination of standardized asthma control questionnaires and pulmonary function testing to hone in on those factors that may be contributing to poor asthma control in women, and how they differ from men. Accordingly, this study is the first to examine sex-specific responses to standardized questionnaires in a detailed fashion.

Few have attempted to assess sex-specific differences in asthma symptom profiles and asthma control on standard questionnaires. Lee and colleagues 4 assessed sex-related differences in severe asthmatics, and noted that when women reported more control problems on the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ) 30 they were more likely to report nocturnal awakenings and missed activities despite having better pulmonary function. In a survey of a managed care population, sex differences were noted in item responses to the mini-AQLQ, with women noting more asthma symptoms and specific triggers such as cigarette smoke, weather, and air pollution 6. Wijnhoven and colleagues 7 noted some sex-specific differences in item responses to the Quality of Life in Respiratory Illness Questionnaire 31 in a survey of patients with asthma in some age groups, but not others.

There are several possible explanations for the sex-specific differences noted in item responses to the questionnaires in this study. Women with poorly-controlled asthma reported more GERD and sinusitis, and were more likely to associate their asthma symptoms with allergies. These findings are similar to other studies 4,6 where women with asthma were more likely to report allergic co-morbidities or sinusitis, and seemed to be more susceptible to environmental triggers 27 than men. These conditions could potentially worsen asthma control, or perhaps more importantly, result in symptoms which mimic asthma and potentially influence the response on the questionnaires evaluated here. In the adjusted analysis, the presence of these factors altered the significance of a few, but not most, responses, suggesting that some differences may be related to their presence, while others may be inherent differences between men and women. Others have suggested that women may have increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness as a result of an increased susceptibility to tobacco smoke 910, perhaps contributing to this increased sensitivity to environmental triggers. However, we did not find a sex-related difference in the provocative concentration of methacholine (PC20) at baseline in our patients.

Another possible explanation may be an increased awareness of dyspnea or an increased tendency to manifest symptoms in women. It has been shown that inspiratory muscle strength is significantly greater in men than women with asthma, and is inversely related to dyspnea 8. Similarly, in healthy female nonsmokers, women demonstrate a lower cough reflex threshold associated with a greater urge to cough and a greater sense of dyspnea when compared to males 32. Finally, it is possible that factors such as pre-menstrual worsening of asthma 3335 or increased anxiety and depression in women with asthma 36 which were not easily accounted for in this analysis could explain some of the sex-related differences we identified.

These findings support the fact that men and women experience asthma differently. As asthma care providers, this information can be used to begin developing sex-specific evaluation and treatment plans which target these differences. There are two major clinical implications of our results. Men may have poorer perception of their disease severity than women, as expressed by poorer pulmonary function and less impairment on standardized asthma questionnaires. This would imply that men need to be carefully screened with testing including lung function to accurately assess impairment. Women may have more severe disease in terms of asthma-related symptoms and impact on QOL despite having more preserved pulmonary function, and co-morbidities such as sinusitis may be particularly important in women. One size does not fit all for asthma assessment, and patients may benefit from sex-specific interventions. Clark and colleagues 1415 have shown that female-specific asthma management improves asthma-related QOL and results in decreased use of rescue inhalers when compared to usual care.

A few limitations to our study must be noted. First, the cross-sectional study design provided only a single evaluation of each participant’s asthma control. Despite the use of standardized questionnaires, many findings were based on self-report and are subject to recall bias. Finally, the original ALA-ACRC studies were not designed to specifically address the question at hand.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that using the overall score alone on currently available asthma questionnaires may not detect sex-specific differences in asthma symptoms, allowing asthma care providers to miss potential opportunities to develop targeted asthma care plans which may improve asthma control for their patients. In addition to utilizing these tools as a global assessment of asthma control, practitioners should be attentive to the potential differences in symptoms which men and women may experience and their potential impact on asthma-related QOL and functional limitation. While future research explores the need for more focused evaluation tools, providers should examine individual item responses with attention to particular sex-specific patterns which may signal areas of sub-optimal control.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health—National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [RO1HL073494, 5U01HL072968]; the American Lung Association; GlaxoSmithKline; the Merck Company Foundation; and AstraZeneca.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACQ

Asthma control questionnaire

ALA-ACRC

American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers

ASUI

Asthma symptom utility index

ATAQ

Asthma therapy assessment questionnaire

BMI

Body mass index

FEV1

Forced expiratory volume in one second

GERD

gastroesophageal reflux disease

LOCCS

Leukotriene or Corticosteroid or Corticosteroid-Salmeterol trial

LODO

Effectiveness of Low Dose Theophylline as Add-On Therapy In Treatment of Asthma

MID

minimal clinically important difference

mini-AQLQ

mini asthma quality of life questionnaire

PC20

provocative concentration of methacholine

QOL

quality of life

SABA

short-acting beta-agonist

SARA

Study of Acid Reflux and Asthma

TAPE

Trial of Asthma Patient Education

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Author contributions:

JWM: study design; writing, review, and guarantor of manuscript.

JH: data analysis; review of manuscript.

CW: data analysis.

JP, CB, AD, LG: review of manuscript.

JGM: study design; review of manuscript.

Contributor Information

Jennifer W. McCallister, Email: Jennifer.McCallister@osumc.edu.

Janet T. Holbrook, Email: jholbroo@jhsph.edu.

Christine Y. Wei, Email: cwei@jhsph.edu.

Jonathan P. Parsons, Email: Jonathan.Parsons@osumc.edu.

Cathy G. Benninger, Email: Cathy.Benninger@osumc.edu.

Anne E. Dixon, Email: Anne.Dixon@vtmednet.org.

Lynn B. Gerald, Email: lgerald@email.arizona.edu.

John G. Mastronarde, Email: John.Mastronarde@osumc.edu.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Liu X. Asthma prevalence, health care use, mortality: United States, 2005-2009. Natl Health Stat Report. 2011;(32):1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moorman JE, Rudd RA, Johnson CA, et al. National Surveillance for Asthma -- United States, 1980-2004. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 2007;56(SS-8) 14p. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.American Lung Association Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. Trends in asthma morbidity and mortality. [On-line report] 2010 [December 21, 2011] Available from: http://www.lungusa.org/finding-cures/our-research/trend-reports/asthma-trend-report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee JH, Haselkorn T, Chipps BE, Miller DP, Wenzel SE. Gender differences in IgE-mediated allergic asthma in the epidemiology and natural history of asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study. J Asthma. 2006;43(3):179–184. doi: 10.1080/02770900600566405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Osborne ML, Vollmer WM, Linton KL, Buist AS. Characteristics of patients with asthma within a large HMO: a comparison by age and gender. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):123–128. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9612063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sinclair AH, Tolsma DD. Gender differences in asthma experience and disease care in a managed care organization. J Asthma. 2006;43(5):363–367. doi: 10.1080/02770900600705334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wijnhoven HA, Kriegsman DM, Snoek FJ, Hesselink AE, de Haan M. Gender differences in health-related quality of life among asthma patients. J Asthma. 2003;40(2):189–199. doi: 10.1081/jas-120017990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weiner P, Magadle R, Massarwa F, Beckerman M, Berar-Yanay N. Influence of gender and inspiratory muscle training on the perception of dyspnea in patients with asthma. Chest. 2002;122(1):197–201. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leynaert B, Bousquet J, Henry C, Liard R, Neukirch F. Is bronchial hyperresponsiveness more frequent in women than in men? A population-based study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(5):1413–1420. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.5.9701060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paoletti P, Carrozzi L, Viegi G, et al. Distribution of bronchial responsiveness in a general population: effect of sex, age, smoking, and level of pulmonary function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(6):1770–1777. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Agarwal AK, Shah A. Menstrual-linked asthma. J Asthma. 1997;34(6):539–545. doi: 10.3109/02770909709055398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Farha S, Asosingh K, Laskowski D, et al. Effects of the menstrual cycle on lung function variables in women with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(4):304–310. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0497OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oguzulgen IK, Turktas H, Erbas D. Airway inflammation in premenstrual asthma. J Asthma. 2002;39(6):517–522. doi: 10.1081/jas-120004921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clark NM, Gong ZM, Wang SJ, Lin X, Bria WF, Johnson TR. A randomized trial of a self-regulation intervention for women with asthma. Chest. 2007;132(1):88–97. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clark NM, Gong ZM, Wang SJ, Valerio MA, Bria WF, Johnson TR. From the female perspective: Long-term effects on quality of life of a program for women with asthma. Gend Med. 2010;7(2):125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(5 Suppl):S94–S138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McCallister JW, Holbrook JT, Wei C, Mastronarde JG. Sex differences in asthma symptom profiles and control assessment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;(183):A4309. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Irvin CG, Kaminsky DA, Anthonisen N, et al. Clinical trial of low-dose theophylline and montelukast in patients with poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(3):235–242. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200603-416OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mastronarde JG, Anthonisen NR, Castro M, et al. Efficacy of esomeprazole for treatment of poorly controlled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(15):1487–1499. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peters SP, Anthonisen N, Castro M, et al. Randomized comparison of strategies for reducing treatment in mild persistent asthma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(20):2027–2039. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wise RA, Bartlett SJ, Brown ED, et al. Randomized trial of the effect of drug presentation on asthma outcomes: the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(3):436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.041. 444e431-438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(4):902–907. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d29.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Juniper EF, Svensson K, Mork AC, Stahl E. Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. Respir Med. 2005;99(5):553–558. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Revicki DA, Leidy NK, Brennan-Diemer F, Sorensen S, Togias A. Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index. Chest. 1998;114(4):998–1007. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.4.998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bime C, Wei CY, Holbrook JT, Sockrider MM, Revicki DA, Wise RA. Asthma symptom utility index: reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(5):1078–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Eur Resp J. 1999;14(1):32–38. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Temprano J, Mannino DM. The effect of sex on asthma control from the National Asthma Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(4):854–860. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chhabra SK, Chhabra P. Gender differences in perception of dyspnea, assessment of control, and quality of life in asthma. J Asthma. 2011;48(6):609–615. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.587577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moore WC, Meyers DA, Wenzel SE, et al. Identification of asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis in the Severe Asthma Research Program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(4):315–323. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0896OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vollmer WM, Markson LE, O'Connor E, et al. Association of asthma control with health care utilization and quality of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(5 Pt 1):1647–1652. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9902098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maille AR, Koning CJ, Zwinderman AH, Willems LN, Dijkman JH, Kaptein AA. The development of the 'Quality-of-life for Respiratory Illness Questionnaire (QOL- RIQ) ': a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with mild to moderate chronic non-specific lung disease. Respir Med. 1997;91(5):297–309. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(97)90034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gui P, Ebihara S, Kanezaki M, et al. Gender differences in perceptions of urge to cough and dyspnea induced by citric acid in healthy never smokers. Chest. 2010;138(5):1166–1172. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gibbs CJ, Coutts II, Lock R, Finnegan OC, White RJ. Premenstrual exacerbation of asthma. Thorax. 1984;39(11):833–836. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.11.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hanley SP. Asthma variation with menstruation. Br J Dis Chest. 1981;75(3):306–308. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(81)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pereira-Vega A, Sanchez JL, Gil FL, et al. Premenstrual asthma and symptoms related to premenstrual syndrome. J Asthma. 2010;47(8):835–840. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.495810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sundberg R, Toren K, Franklin KA, et al. Asthma in men and women: treatment adherence, anxiety, and quality of sleep. Respir Med. 2010;104(3):337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES