The bacterium Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of cholera, a severe gastrointestinal disease characterized primarily by the excretion of large amounts of the so-called rice water stool, which contains critical electrolytes and water. Cholera patients may succumb very quickly to the resulting severe dehydration producing significant morbidity and mortality rates. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 3-5 million cases of cholera occur each year with 100,000-120,000 yearly estimated deaths. Clearly, V. cholerae represents a critical public health concern1.
Key therapeutic efforts against cholera in humans include electrolyte replenishment, and for severe cholera cases, antimicrobial agents, such as tetracycline, furazolidone, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole2. Though antimicrobials shorten the duration of illness and reduce faecal shedding of V. cholerae, prolonged antimicrobial use results in the development of antimicrobial resistance. Strains of V. cholerae have emerged that are resistant not only to each of these antimicrobial agents but also to multiple drugs, further confounding treatment efforts against cholera3.
Bacterial antimicrobial resistance mechanisms consist of enzymatic drug inactivation, drug target protection, reduced drug permeability into bacterial cells, biofilm protection, alteration of drug target, alteration of metabolite pathways, and active efflux of single and multiple drugs from cells3. Active multi-drug efflux is a major mechanism for bacterial pathogen drug resistance4. Efflux pumps are integral-membrane proteins that confer single - and multi-drug resistances by actively extruding drugs from bacterial pathogens4,5. We discovered a new multi-drug efflux pump, called EmrD-3, from V. cholerae O3956. EmrD-3 confers resistance in V. cholerae against linezolid, rifampin, ethidium bromide, minocycline, erythromycin, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, and rhodamine 6G6. EmrD-3 and other multi-drug resistance mechanisms allow bacteria to survive in the presence of clinically useful antimicrobials, thus reducing the efficacy of infectious disease chemotherapy6,7. Bacterial genome sequencing and comparative genomics have recently become commonplace, and such molecular analyses are important for identifying genetic determinants that confer pathogenesis, including those determinants that confer drug and multidrug resistance8. Because of their overwhelming presence in bacterial pathogens, active multi-drug efflux mechanisms remain a major research area, so that measures may ultimately be discovered to inhibit multi-drug efflux9. Thus, modulation of multi-drug efflux may restore the clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutics against infectious diseases caused by multi-drug resistant bacterial pathogens.
There are three key energy-dependent solute transport systems. The first is primary active transport, in which ATP hydrolysis is the mode of energy for the entry of molecules into, or efflux from, cells10. Another system is the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) in which a solute is phosphorylated as it is transported across the membrane11,12. Lastly, secondary active transport systems use ion gradients as the energy-mode for transport of nutrients into cells13 or efflux of molecules from cells14. The ion may be a proton (H+) or a sodium ion (Na+). Secondary active efflux systems, although poorly understood, are energized by the translocation of the cation across the membrane down its concentration gradient into the cell and the concomitant transport of drug to the outside of the bacterium, a process known as ion/drug antiport14. Energy-dependent drug extrusion systems allow cells, including bacteria, to resist potentially lethal molecules like antibacterial agents, heavy metals, toxic metabolites, etc14. Efflux pumps may harbour a single drug-substrate conferring resistance to that drug7,15. An interesting property of other efflux pumps is that these intrinsically harbour multiple substrates, providing the advantage of resistance to multiple structurally-different drugs7. Such multi-drug efflux pumps in bacterial pathogens would make good targets for inhibitors, as reducing multi-drug efflux may restore the clinical efficacy of older drugs and prevent emergence of drug-resistant variants.
Inhibition of drug efflux pumps is a rapidly expanding field of interest, and many strategies have been invoked to do so. Early ‘uncouplers’ of solute transport, such as cyanide-containing compounds, were non-specific in nature and extremely toxic to hosts16. Such compounds were clearly not good for chemotherapy. One strategy sought to bypass the efflux pump directly using synthetic-derivatives of their substrates. A tetracycline-derivative, tigecycline, was not a good efflux substrate17. Other strategies include modulation of efflux pump assembly, expression, and energy-coupling18. Tremendous efforts are aimed at studying inhibitors that directly bind drug efflux pumps and inhibit transport. Reserpine, for instance, inhibits both primary and secondary active efflux19. Such modulators, called resistance modifying agents (RMAs), when used in combination with antimicrobial agents produce a synergistic reduction in drug resistance phenotypes.
Though many newer efflux pumps as wells as the homologues of existing ones are being reported from various bacteria, their clinical relevance remains to be definitively demonstrated. Studies should focus on those efflux pumps which have been shown to confer clinical levels of resistance to understand the molecular basis of antimicrobial efflux and to identify their inhibitors. Though mutagenic studies of some of highly conserved amino acid residues identified by comparisons with their well characterized homologues will provide important information on their functionalities, understanding the interactions of these amino acids with the drugs in three dimensional space is critical to identifying inhibitors with similar binding properties to the preferred drug substrates of the efflux pumps. Though the lack of structural data from protein crystallization or NMR studies is a serious hindrance, this to a great extent can be overcome using modern bioinformatics tools20. Takatsuka et al21 showed interactions of the AcrB drug-binding pocket with several substrates using computer docking tools, and reported that the AcrB protein has different binding pockets for different substrates within the main substrate-binding domain, a finding that needs critical consideration when efflux pump inhibitors are selected21. This observation of multiple substrate binding sites gains further strength from another study using the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) efflux pump inhibitor Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide which inhibits levofloxacin efflux by MexAB-OprM, but is not effective against other substrates of the MexAB system such as ethidium bromide and carbenicillin22. The unique structural behaviours of efflux pumps such as changes in the transporter conformation following binding with the drug may not be predicted accurately by docking tools, and this discrepancy may result in an inhibitor identified by docking studies not showing any in vitro inhibition23. It remains to be understood whether putative inhibitors directly bind to and inhibit bacterial drug efflux pumps or if efflux modulation can occur through the regulation of gene expression or of pump assembly. Additionally, such efflux pump inhibitors would need to be demonstrated as non-toxic to humans in order to make this avenue for modulation of multidrug efflux valuable. Because reserpine directly binds and inhibits secondary active efflux pumps, such as Bmr and NorA24,25, it may be advantageous to explore this area as well, when considering the efficacy of chemotherapeutic restoration. In any case, the vast array of new chemical compounds and naturally occurring agents predict that there are promising avenues for the discovery of novel agents that would inhibit or modulate bacterial drug efflux to help make antimicrobial therapy more effective against infectious disease caused by V. cholerae.
Acknowledgment
The studies in the authors’ laboratories were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health, USA, under award number 8P20GM103451.
References
- 1.Charles RC, Ryan ET. Cholera in the 21st century. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:472–7. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834a88af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ghosh A, Ramamurthy T. Antimicrobials & cholera: are we stranded? Indian J Med Res. 2011;133:225–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kitaoka M, Miyata ST, Unterweger D, Pukatzki S. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Vibrio cholerae. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:397–407. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.023051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kumar S, Varela MF. Biochemistry of bacterial multidrug efflux pumps. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:4484–95. doi: 10.3390/ijms13044484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Floyd JL, Smith KP, Kumar SH, Floyd JT, Varela MF. LmrS is a multidrug efflux pump of the major facilitator superfamily from Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:5406–12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00580-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith KP, Kumar S, Varela MF. Identification, cloning, and functional characterization of EmrD-3, a putative multidrug efflux pump of the major facilitator superfamily from Vibrio cholerae O395. Arch Microbiol. 2009;191:903–11. doi: 10.1007/s00203-009-0521-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Levy SB. Active efflux mechanisms for antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:695–703. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kumar S, Lindquist IE, Sundararajan A, Rajanna C, Floyd JT, Smith KP, et al. Genome sequence of non-O1 Vibrio cholerae PS15. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00227–12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00227-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lewis K. In search of natural substrates and inhibitors of MDR pumps. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3:247–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Veen HW, Konings WN. The ABC family of multidrug transporters in microorganisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1365:31–6. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kumar S, Smith KP, Floyd JL, Varela MF. Cloning and molecular analysis of a mannitol operon of phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase (PTS) type from Vibrio cholerae O395. Arch Microbiol. 2011;193:201–8. doi: 10.1007/s00203-010-0663-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boos W, Shuman H. Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:204–29. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.1.204-229.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Varela MF, Wilson TH. Molecular biology of the lactose carrier of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1276:21–34. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(96)00030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mitchell P. Foundations of vectorial metabolism and osmochemistry. Biosci Rep. 1991;11:297–344. doi: 10.1007/BF01130212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Varela MF, Griffith JK. Nucleotide and deduced protein sequences of the class D tetracycline resistance determinant: relationship to other antimicrobial transport proteins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1253–8. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.6.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lopilato J, Tsuchiya T, Wilson TH. Role of Na + and Li + in thiomethylgalactoside transport by the melibiose transport system of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1978;134:147–56. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.1.147-156.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rossi F, Andreazzi D. Overview of tigecycline and its role in the era of antibiotic resistance. Braz J Infect Dis. 2006;10:203–16. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702006000300010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bhardwaj AK, Mohanty P. Bacterial efflux pumps involved in multidrug resistance and their inhibitors: rejuvinating the antimicrobial chemotherapy. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2012;7:73–89. doi: 10.2174/157489112799829710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Giai M, Biglia N, Sismondi P. Chemoresistance in breast tumors. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1991;12:359–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455–61. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Takatsuka Y, Chen C, Nikaido H. Mechanism of recognition of compounds of diverse structures by the multidrug efflux pump AcrB of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6559–65. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001460107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lomovskaya O, Warren MS, Lee A, Galazzo J, Fronko R, Lee M, et al. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:105–16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.105-116.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nikaido H, Pages JM. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:340–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00290.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Klyachko KA, Schuldiner S, Neyfakh AA. Mutations affecting substrate specificity of the Bacillus subtilis multidrug transporter Bmr. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2189–93. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.7.2189-2193.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Neyfakh AA. The multidrug efflux transporter of Bacillus subtilis is a structural and functional homolog of the Staphylococcus NorA protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:484–5. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.2.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]