Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Medical Research logoLink to The Indian Journal of Medical Research
. 2013 Sep;138(3):295–302.

Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia - A review

Jai B Mullerpattan *,, Zarir F Udwadia *, Farokh E Udwadia *
PMCID: PMC3818591  PMID: 24135173

Abstract

Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (TPE) is a syndrome of wheezing, fever and eosiniphilia seen predominantly in the Indian subcontinent and other tropical areas. Its etiological link with Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi has been well established. The pathogenesis is due to an exaggerated immune response to the filarial antigens which includes type I, type III and type IV reactions with eosinophils playing a pivotal role. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is usually striking with levels over 3000/μl being common. High serum levels of IgE and filarial-specific IgE and IgG are also found. The pathology may vary from an acute eosinophilic alveolitis to histiocytic infiltration depending on the stage of the disease. While earlier studies had suggested that the disease runs a benign course, more recent work has shown that untreated TPE could result in a fair degree of respiratory morbidity. Pulmonary function tests may show a mixed restrictive and obstructive abnormality with a reduction in diffusion capacity. The bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) eosinophil count has a negative correlation with the diffusion capacity. Treatment consists of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) for at least three weeks. Despite treatment with DEC, about 20 per cent of patients may relapse. Steroids have shown to have a beneficial effect but the exact dose and duration is yet to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials. A specific and easily available marker is required for TPE in order to distinguish it from other parasitic and non-parasitic causes of pulmonary eosinophilia.

Keywords: Cough, DEC, fibrosis, filarial antigen, microfilariae, tropical pulmonary eosinophilia, wheezing

Historical background

First described in 1940 and labelled as “pseudotuberculosis with eosinophilia”1, the term tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (TPE) was first coined by Weingarten in 19432 to a syndrome of wheezing, fever, eosinophilia and bilateral mottling of the lungs. This was followed by a series of reports describing similar conditions from the tropical regions such as the Indian subcontinent3,4,5,6.

The pathology, pathogenesis, links with the Wuchereria antigen and the Brugia malayi antigens and effectiveness of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) as therapy were subsequently described. TPE was initially thought to be a benign self-limiting condition. It is now an accepted fact that though TPE does not end fatally, it does and can scar the lung badly.

Epidemiology

TPE is endemic in areas with filarial endemicity. It is most commonly found in regions of the Indian subcontinent, South East Asia, South America and Africa7,8,9. It is found in less than 1 per cent of filarial infections and occurs as a hypersensitivity reaction to the microfilariae. In India, it is mostly found around the coastal regions from Maharashtra to Kerala and West Bengal to Tamil Nadu7. The prevalence of TPE in various settings in India has varied from 0.5 per cent among children in Tamil Nadu10 to 9.9 per cent among jail inmates in Patna11. Some cases have been reported from non-endemic countries such as Japan12, Netherlands13, United Kingdom14 and Australia15, probably as a result of travel to or immigration from endemic areas. In fact, persons travelling to endemic areas may be more prone as they lack natural immunity to filarial antigens16.

Clinical features

TPE occurs mostly in young males with a male-female ratio of 4:1 and in an age group between 15-40 yr18. It may involve multiple body systems but predominantly affects the lungs7. Udwadia7 reported in his study that about 7 per cent of patients had only non-pulmonary manifestations. The respiratory symptoms are chiefly cough, breathlessness, wheezing and chest pain. Symptoms are mostly nocturnal but may also occur during the day7,17. Sputum production is in scanty quantities and may be viscous and mucoid. Sputum eosinophilia is often present7. Chest pain may be due to rib fractures caused by excessive vigorous coughing.

Rare pulmonary presentations include consolidation, cavitation18, pneumothorax19 and bronchiectasis20.

Systemic symptoms include fever, weight loss, fatigue and malaise. Extrapulmonary manifestations include lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly17. Cor pulmonale does not occur and ECG changes are non-specific21. Neurologic involvement is not known. Wheezes and crackles may be found on examination although 20 per cent of patients may have no findings on examination7. Laboratory findings are characterized by a striking eosinophilia >3000/μm and may rise as high as 80,000/μm16,17,22. Eosinophil count may show diurnal fluctuations and may paradoxically be lowest during the night when the symptoms are at their worst (probably due to sequestration of eosinophils within the lungs). Blood eosinophils may show cytoplasmic vacuoles and degranulation. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is usually elevated in 90 per cent of the cases. High serum levels of IgE and filarial-specific IgE and IgG are found8,9,23. In a study by Neva et al24, serum IgE level was 2355 ng/ml which reduced (but did not normalize) to about 600ea - 1000 ng/ml after 8-12 days of treatment. Wb E34 penicillinase and W. bancrofti microfilarial excretory secretory (Wb mf ES) antigen detect filarial antibody in 35 per cent of cases of TPE (which rises to almost 81% in the presence of microfilaraemia)25.

Aetiology

TPE occurs as an unusual hypersensitivity response to the filarial antigens of W. bancrofti and B. malayi. This conclusion has been arrived at based on various histopathological and immunological studies.

Evidence for filarial infection as a cause of TPE

  • (i)

    Danaraj et al26,27 and Danaraj and Schacher28 showed a positive complement fixation test to Dirofilaria immitis antigen in the form of an alcohol-based extract indicating that tropical eosinophilia may well be a systemic manifestation of sensitivity to the filarial antigen.

  • (ii)

    Several studies7,29,30 showed the presence of microfilariae in the lungs of patients of tropical eosinophilia. Webb et al29 found the microfilariae to be sheathed and showed the anatomical features characteristic of W. bancrofti, and also reported therapeutic responses to DEC.

  • (iii)

    Topographical distribution of endemic filariasis in India coincides with the incidence of tropical eosinophilia. Filariasis is common along the greater part of the Western coast of India particularly the coastal strip around Maharashtra, Goa and Kerala, along the whole of the Eastern coast of India, in West Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, parts of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh as also in parts of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Tropical eosinophilia is also very common in all the above mentioned parts of the country7. Also, the response to DEC which is filaricidal is further evidence to support this.

There have been isolated reports of TPE occurring by animal filarial infection31,32,33,34. However, this seems to be extremely rare.

Pathology

The first histopathological descriptions on TPE were reported by Viswanathan in 194735. The first series of open lung biopsies was reported by Udwadia and Joshi in 196436. They detected parasites in only three of the 26 biopsies. The histopathological reactions observed were mainly classified into three types:

  • (i)

    Acute eosinophilic infiltration, eosinophilic bronchopneumonia and eosinophilic abscesses.

  • (ii)

    Mixed cell type of infiltrate (i.e. eosinophils and histiocytes) with generally well-marked fibrous tissue formation between six months to two years.

  • (iii)

    Histiocytic infiltration and fibrosis beyond two years in the natural history of the disease. Fibrosis occurred early in the natural course of the disease. It was usually interstitial but also peribronchial and perivascular in distribution. It is slowly progressive. Later in the natural course, the lung is badly scarred with a restrictive pattern. However, it is never as crippling as in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although symptoms and eosinophilia usually resolve within one month of treatment with DEC, the lung biopsies demonstrate incomplete histological regression.

Natural history - Correlation of the clinical features with the lung functions and histopathology

Initially it was felt that TPE was, by and large a benign, self-limiting condition. TPE does not kill the patient and hence may be classified as “benign”. However, Udwadia and Joshi36 showed that in TPE, the lung could be badly scarred and a fair degree of respiratory morbidity could occur. There is definite correlation between the histopathological features and the clinical and lung function abnormalities that the patient presents with7,35,37,38,39,40.

  • (1)

    The earliest histopathological response is a histiocytic infiltrate in the lung parenchyma. The eosinophil is scarce and yet, intriguingly, the patient manifests with cough, breathlessness, wheezing, a few crepitations and an increased peripheral eosinophil count. The wheezing is chiefly due to bronchial spasm as there is no endobronchial obstruction. The crepitations are due to exudates in the alveoli and smaller bronchioles.

  • (2)

    Soon after the histiocytic response, there occurs an acute eosinophilic exudate within the lungs. The symptom complex is unchanged. The early features of acute breathlessness (sometimes but not always associated with wheezing) are really due to an alveolitis with involvement of the airways. It is due to hypersensitivity (type 1 immune response) reaction to the microfilariae trapped within the lungs. There is a marked increase in the IgE levels in the blood. Lung function shows a restrictive pattern in a number of patients together with superadded obstruction (in 30% of the cases). The wheezing observed is not only due to bronchial spasm but also due to mucosal oedema, mucosal thickening due to eosinophilic infiltration, and partial blockage of bronchioles produced by clumps of eosinophils and shedded mucosa. We now have the fully developed clinical syndrome which if untreated shows spontaneous remissions and relapses; the peripheral eosinophilia often increases.

  • (3)

    Later in the natural history, from six months to two years, patients come with breathlessness on exertion instead of the episodic dyspnoea so often seen in the first three months. The histopathology now shows a mixed cell reaction (histiocytes, epitheloid cells, lymphocytes and eosinophils). Lung function shows more “restriction” and less “obstruction”. The disease is still recognized by the well-marked peripheral eosinophilia.

  • (4)

    Still later (at 2-5 years from onset), untreated patients show well-marked pulmonary fibrosis. Breathlessness on exertion is the dominant feature. There are more histiocytes and lymphocytes and scattered foci of eosinophils along with fibrous bands. In some of these patients, the eosinophilia progressively wanes and if the patient had not been observed in the early phase of the disease, it could be indistinguishable from other causes of lung fibrosis.

  • (5)

    It is possible that some patients in the tropics who were labelled as “bronchitis” or having a degree of “pulmonary fibrosis” may well be end stage of TPE. Lung functions now show a clear restrictive pattern. The degree of pulmonary disability is nowhere what we see in interstitial lung disease. This is because the fibrosis is patchy and not progressive. Generally, patients do not get cor-pulmonale unless they are fairly heavy smokers.

  • (6)

    An accurate assessment of the frequency of pulmonary disability in TPE would be difficult to ascertain; it would certainly be a small minority if one were to consider all patients of TPE. However, if one were to consider only patients of TPE with a history of 2-5 years duration who were untreated or had an incomplete response to DEC, the number left with considerable disability would be significant7.

  • (7)

    Waning of peripheral eosinophilia on follow up: It has been observed that some patients with frequent relapses showed lesser and lesser degrees of increase in the absolute eosinophil count in the peripheral blood with each relapse; this was associated with an incomplete response in their respiratory symptoms and signs to DEC. Waning of the peripheral eosinophil count could present a problem in diagnosis for the end result in the natural history would then be characterized by respiratory disability with a peripheral eosinophil count which is far less than what is usually seen in tropical eosinophilia. The relation of such an end result (when seen for the first time) to tropical eosinophilia may then be impossible to determine7,36,37.

Pathogenesis and immunology

Mature gravid human filarial parasites, living in the lymphatics periodically release microfilariae which are trapped within the pulmonary microcirculation. As a result, microfilaraemia is rarely observed in TPE7. The degenerating microfilariae release their antigenic constituents which triggers an immune response41. The presence of cough, breathlessness, wheezing, peripheral eosinophilia and pulmonary infiltrates points to a hypersensitivity reaction. There is a severe eosinophilic inflammation involving the lower airways. The dual role of the eosinophil i.e. destruction of microfilariae, and lung damage by release of eosinophilic granule components gives it a central role in the pathogenesis of TPE. Activated eosinophils release eosinophil degranulation products, eosinophil derived neurotoxin (EDN), eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and major basic proteins (MBP)42. EDN has been found to be increased in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of patients with TPE compared to controls43. Major basic protein-2 (MBP-2) has been postulated to be a useful biomarker for eosinophilic diseases such as TPE44. MBP has been reported to be associated with airway hyper-reactivity which is one of the presenting symptoms of TPE45. In a study by Pinkston et al42, BAL from acute untreated TPE revealed a striking eosinophilic alveolitis. When individuals with acute TPE were treated with DEC, there was a marked decrease in lung eosinophils and improvement in lung functions. A study by Rom et al46 also showed that there was a mild persistent inflammation despite a three week course of DEC leading to chronic dyspnoea due to restrictive lung disease. The BAL showed a persistent eosinophilic alveolitis and increased amounts of free radicals and oxidants.

It has been proposed that interleukin (IL)-4 induces while interferon (IFN)-gamma suppresses filarial-induced airway hyper-reactivity47. The immune response includes type 1, type III and type IV hypersensitivity reactions7,39,40,48,49.

There is a profound antibody response in the lower airways in patients with TPE. Nutman et al41 showed strikingly elevated total IgE in the lower respiratory tract epithelial lining fluid (ELF) along with high levels of filarial-specific IgG, IgM, and IgE. When these patients were re-evaluated after 6-14 days of therapy with DEC, there was marked reduction in ELF parasite-specific IgG and IgE, which corresponded to the clinical response. Immunoblot comparison of the antigen recognition patterns of ELF and serum antibodies demonstrated a general similarity in parasite antigens recognized.

The Bm23-25, an IgE inducing antigen of the infective L3 stage larvae of B. malayi has been detected in patients with TPE50,51. There is molecular mimicry between this antigen and the human gamma-glutaryl transpeptidase present on the surface of the pulmonary epithelium52,53. In BAL studies IgE against Bm23-25 has been detected50. This may hence play an important role in the pathogenesis of TPE.

Untreated or partially treated TPE may progress to interstitial lung disease (ILD)7,17,39,40,54 with the role of mononuclear cells, macrophages, histiocytes, platelets and eosinophils in maintaining inflammation and inducing fibrosis under investigation. Recovery of lymphocytes and macrophages from BAL is more likely to correlate with impaired lung volumes38. The inflammatory response, although mostly confined to the lung may affect other organs such as liver, spleen, lymph nodes. If microfilariae succeed in running the gauntlet of the pulmonary circulation, they reach the systemic circulation and can set up an eosinophilic reaction chiefly in the reticuloendothelial system (liver, spleen, lymph nodes) and rarely in the muscle and the gastrointestinal tract7,29,55,56.

Chest imaging findings

About 20 per cent of patients with TPE may have a normal chest radiograph7. The main radiological features include reticulo-nodular shadows more in the mid to lower zones and miliary mottling which make differentiation from miliary tuberculosis often difficult7,57,58. Computerized tomography (CT) scan often reveals bronchiectasis, air trapping, lymphadenopathy, cavitation, consolidation or pleural effusions in addition to the miliary mottling and interstitial shadows59. Radiologic findings very often regress on treatment with DEC but many patients may show residual changes60.

Lung function changes

Spirometry is usually mixed restrictive and obstruction which may be mild to moderate in degree7,37,61,62,63,64,65. In a study by Kuppurao et al66 the mean values of expiratory flow rates were significantly decreased in untreated TPE and while there was improvement with treatment, it was still below normal at one month. Udwadia7 had reported a pure restrictive pattern on spirometry in 70 per cent patients and mixed disorder in 30 per cent. Vijayan et al67 also reported a low transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TLCO) as measured by the single breath method. This reduction in TLCO is due to deceased area for diffusion although pulmonary capillary blood volume is normal. Most lung functions including TLCO improve on treatment with DEC but may not return to normal. The patients who had frequent relapses or responded poorly to DEC were more likely to have impaired lung functions with progress to interstitial fibrosis.

A study by Vijayan et al38 showed a negative correlation between BAL eosinophil count and TLCO and transfer coefficient (KCO) in patients with TPE but not forced vital capacity (FVC). The alveolar macrophage count had a negative correlation with FVC but not TLCO, while the BAL lymphocyte count had a negative correlation with total lung capacity (TLC) leading them to conclude that lymphocytes and macrophages were more damaging to the lung. Blood gas analysis has shown mild arterial hypoxaemia in about 41 per cent of patients with untreated TPE68. This may be due to a ventilation-perfusion mismatch as observed on V/Q scanning69.

Differential diagnosis

Eosinophilia in tropical countries is mostly caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to helminthes70,71,72,73. While TPE due to hypersensitivity to filarial antigen is commonest, eosinophilia may also be due to roundworm74, Toxocara75, strongyloides76 and hookworm77. Non-infectious causes mainly include bronchial asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, acute and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, Churg-Strauss syndrome, idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, and drug reactions78,79.

Patients with a TPE like syndrome due to other helminthes may have serological tests which cross-react with filarial antigens80. Hence, there is a need for more specific tests which can differentiate filarial TPE from other causes of TPE like syndrome. An ELISA test detecting the Og4C3 antigen is sensitive and specific for W. bancrofti infections81,82,83 but fails to detect B. malayi infection. A sandwich ELISA detecting antibodies to recombinant antigen Bm-SXP-1 has been found useful to detect B. malayi infection84.

Until a more specific and sensitive test is commercially available, the following criteria may be useful in distinguishing filarial TPE from non-filarial TPE like syndromes – (i) history suggestive of nocturnal symptoms mainly cough and dyspnoea, (ii) pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph, (iii) leukocytosis with peripheral eosinophilia > 3000/μm, (iv) elevated serum IgE and filarial specific IgG and IgE, and (v) clinical improvement with DEC16,17,23.

It is important to rule out other causes of TPE-like syndromes such as strongyloidosis as use of steroids in these cases may cause disseminated infection85.

Management

Weingarten, in 19432, had described the successful treatment of TPE with neoarsphenamine. However, by the late 1950s and early 1960s, DEC had completely replaced arsenic compounds in the treatment of TPE86,87. Initially Baker et al86 had recommended a 7-10 day course of DEC at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day. However, Udwadia7 found that the response to treatment was better when the drug was used for four weeks. About 4-5 per cent of the patients may not respond to DEC. In chronic patients with a long duration of symptoms, the drug may be ineffective even in up to 20-40 per cent cases, probably due to already established fibrosis7. Many studies46,60,88 have demonstrated incomplete response to treatment with a standard three week course of DEC with a persistent lower respiratory inflammation and oxidative stress. Steroids have been shown to have a beneficial effect17 but the exact dose and duration in combination with DEC is yet to be determined by randomized controlled trials.

Relapse

In the only follow up study of patients for five years, the relapse rate was found to be almost 20 per cent after DEC therapy7. As a result, monthly courses at 2-3 month intervals for 1-2 years have been suggested. In a few patients, DEC was not found to be as effective in successive relapses as it was in the original episode leading to chronic respiratory impairment and also the degree of peripheral eosinophilia decreased with successive relapses7.

Prevention

The World Health Assembly aims to eliminate lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem by 202089. The WHO strategy aims at preventing transmission of microfilaria through mosquito bites. The goal is to treat the population at risk for lymphatic filariasis through a once yearly combination of DEC (6 mg/kg) and albendazole (400 mg) for 4-6 years (i.e. the reproductive life span of the filarial parasite)90,91. A study from Egypt has reported encouraging results for this strategy92.

Conclusion

TPE is caused by a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction to filarial antigens (W. bancrofti or B. malayi). It presents as an eosinophilic alveolitis with an airway component. With the passage of time, the presenting symptom is breathlessness on exertion and the lung shows a mixed cell reaction. Later on in untreated patients well-marked fibrosis occurs. Lung function shows increasing restriction. The peripheral eosinophilia may wane so that the end result may not be recognized as TPE unless the patient was observed in the early part of the natural history. DEC produces remission but a mild inflammatory state persists and almost 20 per cent patients may relapse in five years. The role of steroids in the treatment of TPE needs to be studied through randomized controlled trials. Strategies to minimize transmission as well ensure effective treatment and reduce relapses need to be tested and put in place. We need an easily available and specific marker for filarial TPE in order to distinguish the pulmonary eosinophilic manifestations of filarial infection from those due to other parasitic infections (ascariasis, ankylostomiasis and strongyloidosis), as also from non-parasitic causes of pulmonary eosinophilia. Once such a diagnostic modality is available, the term tropical pulmonary eosinophilia may turn out to be obsolete and replaced by specific aetiology-induced eosinophilia.

References

  • 1.Frimodt-Moller C, Barton RM. A pseudo-tuberculosis condition associated with eosinophilia. Indian Med Gaz. 1940;75:607–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weingarten RJ. Tropical eosinophilia. Lancet. 1943;1:103–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Viswanathan R. Pulmonary eosinophilosis. Q J Med. 1948;17:257–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parsons-Smith BG. Tropical eosinophilia. Lancet. 1944;1:433–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Danaraj TJ. Eosinophilic lung. Med J Malaya. 1947;1:278–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chaudhari RN. Tropical eosinophilia. J Indian Med Assoc. 1956;27:195–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Udwadia FE. Herzog H, editor. Tropical eosinophilia. Pulmonary eosinophilia: progress in pulmonary research. 1975;VII:35–155. Basel: S Karger. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Neva FA, Ottesen EA. Tropical (filarial) eosinophilia. N Engl J Med. 1978;289:1129–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197805182982006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ottesen EA. Immunological aspects of lymphatic filariasis and onhocerciasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1984;73(Suppl):9–18. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(84)90309-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ray D, Abel R, Selvaraj KG. Epidemiology of pulmonary eosinophilia in rural south India - a prospective study, 1981-86. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;7:469–74. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.6.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Viswanathan R, Prasad M, Prasad S, Saran R, Sinha TR, Sinha SP. Morbidity survey of jail population. Part I: Incidence of certain chronic respiratory diseases with special reference to pulmonary eosinophilosis. Indian J Chest Dis. 1965;7:142–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hayashi K, Horiba M, Shindou J, Sumida T, Takekoshi A. Tropical eosinophilia in a man from Sri Lanka (in Japanese) Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;34:1411–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stuiver PC, Wismans PJ, Schornagel R. Tropical eosinophilia as an imported disease in the Netherlands (Dutch) Ned Tiidschr Geneeskd. 1991;135:283–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robinson GL. Pulmonary Tropical Eosinophila in Greenwich. Br Med J. 1968;4:517–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5629.517-d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goldsmid JM, Nightingale R, Clark D. Imported filarial infections in Tasmania. Med J Aust. 1980;1:667. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1980.tb135222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ong RK, Doyle RL. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Chest. 1998;113:1673–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.6.1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vijayan VK. Immunopathogenesis and treatment of eosinophilic lung diseases in the tropics. In: Sharma OP, editor. Lung biology in health and disease: tropical lung disease. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2006. pp. 195–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Islam N, Nurul Haq AQM. Eosinophilic lung abscess. BMJ. 1962;1:1810–1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5295.1810-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Menon NK. Tropical eosinophilia - atypical manifestations. Indian J Chest Dis. 1963;5:231–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rab SM, Nurul Haq AQM, Chaudhary GM. Tropical eosinophilia and bronchiectasis. Br J Dis Chest. 1963;57:103–6. doi: 10.1016/s0007-0971(63)80022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vakil RJ. Cardiovascular involvement in tropical eosinophilia. Br Heart J. 1961;23:578–86. doi: 10.1136/hrt.23.5.578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ottesen EA, Nutman TB. Tropical Pulmonary Eosinophiliain. Annu Rev Med. 1992;43:417–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.43.020192.002221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Spry CJF, Kumaraswami V. Tropical eosinophilia. Semin Hematol. 1982;19:101–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Neva FA, Kaplan AP, Pacheco G, Gray L, Danaraj TJ. Tropical eosinophilia. A human model of parasitic immunopathology, with observations on serum IgE levels before and after treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1975;55:422–9. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(75)90081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reddy MV, Parkhe KA, Piessens WF, Harinath BC. Wb E34 monoclonal antibody: further characterization and diagnostic use in bancroftian filariasis. J Clin Lab Anal. 1989;3:277–81. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860030504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Danaraj TJ, D’silva LS, Schacher JF. The filarial complement fixation test in eosinophilic lung (a preliminary report) Proc Alumni Ass Malaya. 1957;10:109–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Danaraj TJ, D’silva LS, Schacher JF. The serological diagnosis of eosinophilic lung and its etiological implications. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1959;8:151–9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1959.8.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Danaraj TJ, Schacher JF. I/D tests with Dirofilaria immitis extract in eosinophilic lung (tropical eosinophilia) Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1959;8:640–3. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1959.8.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Webb JKG, Job CK, Gault FW. Tropical eosinophilia. Demonstration of microfilariae in lung, liver and lymph nodes. Lancet. 1960;1:835–42. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)90730-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Danaraj TJ, Pacheco G, Shanmugaratnam K, Beaver PC. The etiology and pathology of eosinophilic lung (tropical eosinophilia) Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966;15:183–9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1966.15.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Buckley JJC. Occult filarial infections of animal origin as a cause of tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. East Afr Med J. 1958;35:8–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beaver PC, Orihel TC. Human infection with filariae of animals in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1965;14:1010–29. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1965.14.1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jung RC, Espenan PH. A case of infection in man with Dirofilaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1967;14:1010–29. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1967.16.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pacheco G, Guillermo A, Schofield HL., Jr Dirofilaria tenuis containing microfiaria in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968;17:180–2. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1968.17.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Viswanathan R. Postmortem appearances in tropical eosinophilia. Indian Med Gaz. 1947;82:49–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Udwadia FE, Joshi VV. A study of tropical eosinophilia. Thorax. 1964;19:548–54. doi: 10.1136/thx.19.6.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Udwadia FE. Tropical eosinophilia - a correlation of clinical, histopathologic and lung function studies. Dis Chest. 1967;52:531–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.52.4.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vijayan VK, Sankaran K, Venkatesan P, Kuppurao KV. Correlation of lower respiratory tract inflammation with changes in lung function and chest roentgenograms in patients with untreated tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Singapore Med J. 1991;32:122–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Udwadia FE. Pulmonary eosinophilia. Part I. J Assoc Physicians India. 1978;26:283–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Udwadia FE. Pulmonary eosinophilia. Part II. J Assoc Physicians India. 1978;26:429–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nutman TB, Vijayan VK, Pinkston P, Kumaraswami V, Steel C, Crystal RG, et al. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: analysis of antifilarial antibody localized to the lung. J Infect Dis. 1989;160:1042–50. doi: 10.1093/infdis/160.6.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pinkston P, Vijayan VK, Nutman TB, Rom WN, O’Donnel KM, Cornelius MJ, et al. Acute tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: characterization of the lower respiratory tract inflammation and its response to therapy. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:216–25. doi: 10.1172/JCI113050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.O’Bryan L, Pinkston P, Kumaraswami V, Vijayan V, Yenokida G, Rosenberg HF, et al. Localised eosinophil degranulation mediates disease in tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1337–42. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1337-1342.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Plager DA, Loegering DA, Checkel JL, Tang J, Kephart GM, Caffes PL, et al. Major basic protein homolog (MBP-2): a specific human eosinophil marker. J Immunol. 2006;177:7340–5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hall LR, Mehlotra RK, Higgins AW, Haxhiu MA, Pearlman E. An essential role for interleukin-5 and eosinophils in heminth-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Infect Immun. 1998;66:4425–30. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.9.4425-4430.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rom WN, Vijayan VK, Cornelius MJ, Kumaraswami V, Prabhakar R, Ottesen EA, et al. Persistent lower respiratory tract inflammation associated with interstitial lung disease in patients with tropical eosinophilia following conventional treatment with diethylcarbamazine. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142:1088–92. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.5.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mehlotra RK, Hall LR, Haxhiu MA, Pearlman E. Reciprocal immunomodulatory effects of gamma interferon and interleukin-4 on filarial-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Infect Immun. 2001;69:1463–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1463-1468.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Udwadia FE. Pulmonary eosinophilic syndrome with special reference to the tropics and asthma. In: Ahuja MMS, editor. Progress in clinical medicine, Second series. New Delhi: Arnold Heinemann; 1978. pp. 453–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Udwadia FE. Immunology of tropical eosinophilia. In: Jain SK, Agarwal MK, editors. Aspects of allergy and applied immunology. XII. Delhi: Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute; 1979. pp. 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lobos E, Ondo A, Ottesen EA, Nutman TB. Biochemical and immunologic characterization of a major IgE-inducing filarial antigen of Brugia malayi and implications for the pathogenesis of tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. J Immunol. 1992;149:3029–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lobos E, Zahn R, Weiss N, Nutman TB. A major allergen of lymphatic filarial nematodes is a parasite homolog of the gamma-glutaryl transpeptidase. Mol Med. 1996;2:712–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lobos E, Nutman TB, Hothersall JS, Moncada S. Elevated immunoglobin E against Brugia malayi gamma-glutaryl transpeptidase in patients with bancroftian filariasis: association with tropical pulmonary eosinophilia or putative immunity. Infect Immun. 2003;71:747–53. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.2.747-753.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gounni AS, Spanel-Borowski K, Palacios M, Heusser C, Moncada S, Lobos E. Pulmonary inflammation induced by a recombinant Brugia malayi gamma-glutaryl transpeptidase homolog; involvement of human autoimmune process. Mol Med. 2001;7:344–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alberts WM. Eosinophilic interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004;10:419–24. doi: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000130330.29422.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jaggi PO. Lymphadenopathy in pulmonary tropical eosinophilosis. Indian J Chest Dis. 1963;5:267–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Saha TK, Raichaudhari MN, Mukherjee AM. Histopathological changes in lymph glands in tropical eosinophilia. Bull Calcutta Sch Trop Med. 1963;11:152–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Islam N, Huque KS. Radiological features of tropical eosinophilia. J Trop Med Hyg. 1965;68:177–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Khoo FY, Danaraj TJ. The roentgenographic appearance of eosinophilic lung. Am J Roentgenol. 1960;83:251–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sandhu M, Mukhopadhyay S, Sharma SK. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: a comparative evaluation of plain chest radiography and computed tomography. Australas Radiol. 1996;40:32–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1996.tb00341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vijayan VK, Kuppurao KV, Sankaran K, Venkatesan P, Prabhakar R. Tropical eosinophilia: clinical and physiological response to diethylcarbamazine. Respir Med. 1991;85:17–20. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(06)80205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kamat SR, Pimparkar BD, Store SD, Warrier NVU, Fakey YC. Study of clinical radiological and pulmonary function patterns of response to treatment in pulmonary eosinophilia. Indian J Chest Dis. 1970;12:91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Azad Khan AK, Patra RW, Banu SA, Rabbee MF. Spirometry in tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Br J Dis Chest. 1970;64:107–9. doi: 10.1016/s0007-0971(70)80036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nesarajah MS. Pulmonary function in tropical eosinophila. Thorax. 1972;27:185–7. doi: 10.1136/thx.27.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Poh SC. The course of lung function in treated tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Thorax. 1974;29:710–2. doi: 10.1136/thx.29.6.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kamat SR, Warrier NVU, Store SD, Karandikar KN, D’Sa E, Hoskote VR. Clinical studies in pulmonary eosinophila. I - Comparative study of response to diethylcarbamazine and corticosteroid drugs. Indian J Chest Dis. 1976;18:221–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kuppurao KV, Vijayan VK, Venkatesan P, Sankaran K. Effect of treatment on maximal expiratory flow rates in tropical eosinophilia. Ceylon Med J. 1993;38:78–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vijayan VK, Kuppurao KV, Venkatesan P, Sankaran K, Prabhakar R. Pulmonary membrane diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume in tropical eosinophilia. Chest. 1990;97:1386–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.6.1386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Vijayan VK, Kuppurao KV, Venkatesan P, Prabhakar R. Arterial hypoxemia in acute tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Lung India. 1988;6:183–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ray D, Jayachandra CA. Ventilation-perfusion scintiscanning in tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Chest. 1993;104:497–500. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.2.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chitkara RK, Krishna G. Parasitic pulmonary eosinophilia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;27:171–84. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kuzucu A. Parasitic diseases of the respiratory tract. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2006;12:212–21. doi: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000219271.80804.9e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kim YJ, Nutman TB. Eosinophilia: causes and pathology in persons with prior exposures in tropical areas with an emphasis on parasitic infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2006;8:43–50. doi: 10.1007/s11908-006-0034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pardo J, Carranza C, Muro A, Angel-Moreno A, Martin AM, Martin T, et al. Helminth-related eosinophilia in African immigrants, Gran Canaria. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1587–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Beaver PC, Danaraj TJ. Pulmonary ascariasis resembling eosinophilic lung. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1958;7:100–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Beaver PC. Parasitological review of visceral larva migrans. Exp Parasitol. 1956;5:587–621. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(56)90032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.de Messias IT, Telles FQ, Boaretti AC, Silva S, Guimarres LM, Genta RM. Clinical, immunological and epidemiological aspects of strongyloidiasis in an endemic area of Brazil. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1987;15:37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.D’Abrera VSE. The aetiology of tropical eosinophilia. Ceylon Med J. 1958;4:195–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kahn JE, Girszyn N, Bletry O. Diagnosis of non-parasitic hypereosinophilia. Presse Med. 2006;35:144–52. doi: 10.1016/s0755-4982(06)74537-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cottin V, Cordier JF. Eosinophilic pneumonias. Allergy. 2005;60:841–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Peixoto CA, Alves LC, Ferreira Da Silva L, Pires ML, Rocha A. Localization and distribution of Wuchereria bancrofti antigens recognized by antisera from tropical pulmonary eosinophilia and from individuals with intestinal helminthes. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 2003;35:61–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rocha A, Addiss D, Riberio ME, Noroes J, Baliza M, Medeiros Z, et al. Evaluation of the Og4C3 ELISA in Wuchereria bancrofti infection: infected persons with undetectable or ultra-low microfilarial densities. Trop Med Int Health. 1996;1:859–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.1996.tb00123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rocha A, Lima G, Medeiros Z, Aquiar-Santos A, Alves S, Montarroyos U, et al. Circulating filarial antigen in the hydrocele fluid from individuals living in a bancroftian filariasis area - Recife, Brazil: detected by the monoclonal antibody Og4C3 assay. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99:101–5. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762004000100018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Magnaval JF, Berry A. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:635–6. doi: 10.1086/427755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lalitha P, Eswaran D, Gnanasekar M, Rao KV, Narayanan RB, Scott A, et al. Development of antigen detection ELISA for the diagnosis of brugian and bancroftian filariasis using antibodies to recombinant filarial antigens Bm-SXP-1 and wb-SXP-1. Microbiol Immunol. 2002;46:327–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2002.tb02703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Namisato S, Motomura K, Haranaga S, Hirata T, Toyama M, Shinzato T, et al. Pulmonary strongyloidiasis in a patient receiving prednisone therapy. Intern Med. 2004;43:731–6. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Baker SJ, Rajan KT, Devadutta S. Treatment of tropical eosinophilia - a controlled trial. Lancet. 1959;2:144–7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(59)90559-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Narang RK, Jain SC. Oral diethylcarbamazine in tropical eosinophilia. Br J Dis Chest. 1966;60:93–100. doi: 10.1016/s0007-0971(66)80005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Vijayan VK, Sankaran K, Venkatesan P, Prabhakar R. Effect of diethylcarbamazine on the alveolitis of tropical eosinophilia. Respiration. 1991;58:255–9. doi: 10.1159/000195941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Gyapong JO, Twum-Danso NA. Editorial: Global elimination of lymphatic filariasis: facts or fantasy? Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:125–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01542.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gyapong JO, Kumaraswami V, Biswas G, Ottesen EA. Treatment strategies underpinning the global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005;6:179–200. doi: 10.1517/14656566.6.2.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ottesen EA. Lymphatic filariasis: treatment,control and elimination. Adv Parasitol. 2006;61:395–441. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)61010-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ramzy RM, El Setouhy M, Helmy H, Ahmed ES, Abd Elaziz KM, Farid HA, et al. Effect of yearly mass drug administration with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole on bancroftian filariasis in Egypt: a comprehensive assessment. Lancet. 2006;367:992–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68426-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Medical Research are provided here courtesy of Scientific Scholar

RESOURCES