Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2013 Aug 19;15(17):10.1021/ol401858k. doi: 10.1021/ol401858k

Redox-Neutral α-C–H Bond Functionalization of Secondary Amines with Concurrent C–P Bond Formation/N-Alkylation

Deepankar Das 1, Daniel Seidel 1,*
PMCID: PMC3818705  NIHMSID: NIHMS517269  PMID: 23957378

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms517269f3.jpg

Redox-neutral formation of C–P bonds in the α-position of amines was achieved via a process that features a combination of an oxidative α-C–H bond functionalization and a reductive N-alkylation. Benzoic acid functions as an efficient catalyst in this three-component reaction of cyclic secondary amines, aldehydes and phosphine oxides to provide rapid access to α-amino phosphine oxides not easily accessible by classic Kabachnik-Fields reactions.


α-Aminophosphonic acids and their phosphonate derivatives have received considerable attention as surrogates of both natural and unnatural α-amino acids.1 These compounds are known to exhibit antitumor, antibiotic, pharmacogenetic and pharmacological properties, and are widely applied in agrochemistry.2 Not surprisingly, much effort has been devoted to the efficient synthesis of α-aminophosphonates and their related α- amino phosphine oxides.3 The three-component reaction between amines, carbonyl compounds and phosphonates, widely known as the Kabachnik-Fields reaction,4 is one of the most useful methods for the synthesis of such compounds (eq 1).5 An alternate strategy, namely the direct α-phosphonation of tertiary amines, has been realized by oxidative C–H functionalization,6,7 including photoredox catalysis (eq 2).8 Apart from the requirement for an oxidant, such processes are often limited to N-aryl tetrahydroisoquinolines and N,N-dialkylanilines. A copper-catalyzed decarboxylative three-component, coupling approach to ring-substituted α-aminophosphonates was reported by Wang and coworkers (eq 3).9,10,11 We envisioned an alternate three-component reaction in which the amino acid would be replaced with a simple amine, removing the requirement for a prefunctionalized substrate (eq. 4). This would result in a method for C–P bond formation via functionalization of relatively unreactive C–H bonds. Here we report the first examples of such a process.

graphic file with name nihms517269f4.jpg (1)
graphic file with name nihms517269f5.jpg (2)
graphic file with name nihms517269f6.jpg (3)
graphic file with name nihms517269f7.jpg (4)

As part of our efforts to develop new amine α-C–H bond functionalization reactions,12,13 we recently reported amine α-cyanations12m and α-alkynylations.12n These redox-neutral14 transformations combine a reductive N-alkylation with an oxidative α-functionalization and feature azomethine ylides as reactive intermediates (Figure 1). Water is produced as the only byproduct. The obvious challenge in the development of such reactions is that they compete with classic organic reactions (e.g., Strecker reaction), namely the addition of the nucleophile to the initially formed iminium ion. An indirect solution to this problem was developed in the case of the α-cyanation; we have shown that α-aminonitriles corresponding to 8 can equilibrate to the thermodynamically more stable regioisomers 7.12m In the α-alkynylation, only minimal isomerization was observed between the propargylic amines corresponding to 7 and 8.12n Here, good to excellent ratios of 7/8 were obtained by using relatively bulky and/or electron-deficient aromatic aldehydes (e.g., 2,6-dichlorobenzaldehyde, mesitaldehyde). The use of these aldehydes in combination with an appropriate catalyst (e.g., a carboxylic acid) apparently accelerates the iminium isomerization pathway and/or decreases the rate of the classic three-component coupling reaction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Competing reaction pathways in the α-C–H bond functionalization of amines.

With the above considerations in mind, we chose 2,6- dichlorobenzaldehyde as the reaction partner to evaluate the proposed reaction of pyrrolidine and different phosphites/phosphine oxides (Table 1). Based on previous success, benzoic acid was selected as the catalyst. Reactions proceeded smoothly under microwave irradiation at 200 °C and the desired regioisomer 9 was consistently isolated as the major product. When diethyl phosphite (1.5 equiv) was allowed to react with pyrrolidine (1.2 equiv) and 2,6-dichlorobenzaldehyde in toluene for 15 min, the desired product 9a was formed in 54% yield (entry 1). In addition, compound 11, the apparent product of a reductive amination, was also isolated in 13% yield.15,16 The corresponding reaction with dibenzyl phosphite led to the formation of 9b in 44% yield, accompanied by simultaneous formation of 11 in 30% yield (entry 2). Gratifyingly, with diphenylphosphine oxide (1.5 equiv) as the reaction partner, product 9c was obtained exclusively in 86% yield (entry 3). Lowering the amount of diphenylphosphine oxide to 1.2 equiv did have no adverse effect on the outcome of the reaction (entry 4). A reduction in catalyst loading to 10 mol% led to a slight decrease in yield (entry 5). The use of 2-ethylhexanoic acid in place of benzoic acid resulted in the exclusive formation of 9c in 84% yield (entry 6). Interestingly, the reaction of 2,6-dichlorobenzaldehyde, pyrrolidine and diphenylphosphine oxide also proceeded without the addition of any catalyst to furnish the desired product 9c in good yield (entry 7). No product formation was observed with copper(II) 2-ethylhexanoate, the catalyst that had proved optimal in the amine α–alkynylation (entry 8).12n

Table 1.

Evaluation of Reaction Parametersa

graphic file with name nihms517269t1.jpg
entry HPOR2
(equiv)
catalyst
(mol %)
ratio
9/10
yield
9+10(%)
yield
11(%)
1 HPO(OEt)2 (1.5) PhCOOH (20) >25:1 54 13
2 HPO(OBn)2 (1.5) PhCOOH (20) >25:1 44 30
3 HPOPh2 (1.5) PhCOOH (20) >25:1 86 N/A
4 HPOPh2 (1.2) PhCOOH (20) >25:1 86 N/A
5 HPOPh2 (1.2) PhCOOH (10) >25:1 80 N/A
6 HPOPh2 (1.2) 2-EHA (20) >25:1 84 N/A
7 HPOPh2 (1.2) -- >25:1 86 N/A

To establish the influence that the nature of the aldehyde exerts on product ratios, the three-component reaction was performed with unsubstituted benzaldehyde (Table 2). A favorable product ratio for 9d/10d of 4.4:1 was observed after a short reaction time of just 5 min (Table 2, entry 1). An increase in reaction time favorably affected product ratios (entries 1–3) and at a reaction time of 30 min, products 9d/10d were obtained in a 21:1 ratio and 87% combined yield. In the absence of any catalyst, the reaction yielded predominantly the undesired regioisomer 10d (entries 4–6), showing that the good product ratio in the uncatalyzed reaction of 2,6-dichlorobenzaldehyde is specific to that particular aldehyde (see Table 1, entry 7). No further improvement could be achieved with 2-ethylhexanoic acid as the catalyst (entries 7, 8). Trifluoroacetic acid proved to be an inferior catalyst (entry 9). This observation is consistent with the previously established requirement for a weakly acidic carboxylic acid catalyst.12m

Table 2.

Dependence of Product Ratios on Catalyst and Reaction Timea

graphic file with name nihms517269t2.jpg
entry catalyst time
(min)
ratio
9d/10d
yield
9d+10d(%)
1 PhCOOH 5 4.4:1 86
2 PhCOOH 15 10:1 87
3 PhCOOH 30 21:1 87
4 -- 5 1:6 83
5 -- 30 1:3 86
6 -- 60 1:1 81
7 2-Ethylhexanoic acid 5 1.2:1 92
8 2-Ethylhexanoic acid 30 13:1 83
9 TFA 30 1:1 66
a

Reactions were performed on a 0.5 mmol scale

The results shown in Table 2 suggest that the equilibration of regioisomeric products is an important factor that affects the observed product ratios. To unambiguously establish that product isomerization does indeed occur, compound 10c was exposed to the previously established reaction conditions (eq 7). In the event, 9c was obtained in 86% yield as the only detectable regioisomer. In the otherwise identical experiment with 10d, products 9d/10d were obtained as an 11:1 regioisomeric mixture in 84% yield (eq 8). While this result nicely matches the second entry in Table 2, the product ratio suggests that the thermodynamic equilibrium ratio is not reached after 15 min. Importantly, no isomerization was observed upon exposing 9c or 9d to the reaction conditions.

graphic file with name nihms517269f8.jpg (7)
graphic file with name nihms517269f9.jpg (8)

The scope of the three-component reaction was explored under the optimized conditions (Figure 2). Reactions of pyrrolidine and diphenylphosphine oxide with various aromatic aldehydes consistently led to the formation of the desired α-amino phosphine oxides 9 as the major or nearly exclusive products. Electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups at different ring positions were well tolerated. Heterocyclic aldehydes were also viable substrates. Benzophenone led to the exclusive formation of ring-substituted product. It was further shown that dibenzylphosphine oxide gives favorable results which are comparable to those of diphenylphosphine oxide. The use of hydrocinnamaldehyde as the substrate gave only the undesired regioisomer. This outcome is similar to what was observed in the corresponding cyanation reaction.12m Upon exposing piperidine to the reaction conditions with diphenylphosphine oxide and 2,6-dichlorobenzaldehyde, the corresponding product was obtained in a 1:1 regioisomeric ratio, albeit in low yield. Azepane provided an even less favorable product ratio and morpholine gave only the regular Kabachnik-Fields reaction product.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Scope of the three-component reaction.

graphic file with name nihms517269f10.jpg (9)

In summary, we have developed a convenient approach for C–P bond formation in the α-position of amines by replacing existing C–H bonds. The oxidative α-functionalization is coupled to a reductive N-alkylation, rendering the overall process redox-neutral. Further applications of this general concept are currently being developed in our laboratory.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgment

Financial support from the NIH– NIGMS (grant R01GM101389-01) is gratefully acknowledged. D.S. is a fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the recipient of an Amgen Young Investigator Award.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures and characterization data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Kukhar VP, Hudson HR, editors. Aminophosphonic and Aminophosphinic Acids: Chemistry and Biological Activity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Lejczak B, Kafarski P. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2009;20:31. [Google Scholar]; (b) Orsini F, Sello G, Sisti M. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010;17:264. doi: 10.2174/092986710790149729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Naydenova ED, Todorov PT, Troev KD. Amino Acids. 2010;38:23. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0254-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Mucha A, Kafarski P, Berlicki L. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:5955. doi: 10.1021/jm200587f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Bhattacharya AK, Rana KC, Pannecouque C, De Clercq E. Chem Med Chem. 2012;7:1601. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201200271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Recent reviews: Ordóñez M, Rojas-Cabrera H, Cativiela C. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:17. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.09.083. Kudzina ZH, Kudzinb MH, Drabowiczc J, Stevens CV. Curr. Org. Chem. 2011;15:2015. Liu BJ, Cen CC, Wu MS, Kong DL. Asian. J. Chem. 2011;23:1417. Ordóñez M, Viveros-Ceballos JL, Cativiela C, Arizpe A. Curr. Org. Synth. 2012;9:310. Ordóñez M, Sayago FJ, Cativiela C. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:6369.
  • 4.(a) Kabachnik MI, Medved TY. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 1952;83:689. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fields EK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952;74:1528. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selected reviews: Zefirov NS, Matveeva ED. ARKIVOC. 2008:1. Keglevich G, Balint E. Molecules. 2012;17:12821. doi: 10.3390/molecules171112821.
  • 6.(a) Basle O, Li C-J. Chem. Commun. 2009:4124. doi: 10.1039/b905275e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Han W, Ofial AR. Chem. Commun. 2009:6023. doi: 10.1039/b913313e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Han W, Mayer P, Ofial AR. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010;352:1667. [Google Scholar]; (d) Xie J, Li H, Xue Q, Cheng Y, Zhu C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012;354:1646. [Google Scholar]; (e) Wang H, Li X, Wu F, Wan B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:681. [Google Scholar]; (f) Alagiri K, Devadig P, Prabhu KR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:1456. [Google Scholar]; (g) Dhineshkumar J, Lamani M, Alagiri K, Prabhu KR. Org. Lett. 2013;15:1092. doi: 10.1021/ol4001153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Selected reviews on amine α-functionalization: Murahashi S-I. Angew. Chem.. Int.. Ed. Engl. 1995;34:2443. Campos KR. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:1069. doi: 10.1039/b607547a. Murahashi SI, Zhang D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:1490. doi: 10.1039/b706709g. Li C-J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009;42:335. doi: 10.1021/ar800164n. Jazzar R, Hitce J, Renaudat A, Sofack-Kreutzer J, Baudoin O. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:2654. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902374. Yeung CS, Dong VM. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1215. doi: 10.1021/cr100280d. Jones KM, Klussmann M. Synlett. 2012;23:159. Zhang C, Tang CH, Jiao N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:3464. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15323h. Mitchell EA, Peschiulli A, Lefevre N, Meerpoel L, Maes BUW. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:10092. doi: 10.1002/chem.201201539. Shi L, Xia W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:7687. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35203f.
  • 8.(a) Rueping M, Zhu S, Koenigs RM. Chem. Commun. 2011:8679. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12907d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hari DP, König B. Org. Lett. 2011;13:3852. doi: 10.1021/ol201376v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Xue QC, Xie J, Jin HM, Cheng YX, Zhu CJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013;11:1606. doi: 10.1039/c3ob27400d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang D, Zhao D, Mao L, Wang L, Wang R. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:6426. doi: 10.1021/jo200981h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.See also: Firouzabadi H, Iranpoor N, Ghaderi A, Ghavami M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:5515.
  • 11.A related oxidative/decarboxylative approach: Hu J, Zhao N, Yang B, Wang G, Guo LN, Liang YM, Yang SD. Chem. Eur. J. 2011:5516. doi: 10.1002/chem.201003561.
  • 12.(a) Zhang C, De CK, Mal R, Seidel D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:416. doi: 10.1021/ja077473r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Murarka S, Zhang C, Konieczynska MD, Seidel D. Org. Lett. 2009;11:129. doi: 10.1021/ol802519r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang C, Murarka S, Seidel D. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:419. doi: 10.1021/jo802325x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Murarka S, Deb I, Zhang C, Seidel D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:13226. doi: 10.1021/ja905213f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhang C, Seidel D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:1798. doi: 10.1021/ja910719x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Deb I, Seidel D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:2945. [Google Scholar]; (g) Zhang C, Das D, Seidel D. Chem. Sci. 2011;2:233. [Google Scholar]; (h) Deb I, Das D, Seidel D. Org. Lett. 2011;13:812. doi: 10.1021/ol1031359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Haibach MC, Deb I, De CK, Seidel D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:2100. doi: 10.1021/ja110713k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Deb I, Coiro DJ, Seidel D. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:6473. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11560j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Vecchione MK, Sun AX, Seidel D. Chem. Sci. 2011;2:2178. [Google Scholar]; (l) Das D, Richers MT, Ma L, Seidel D. Org. Lett. 2011;13:6584. doi: 10.1021/ol202957d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Ma L, Chen W, Seidel D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:15305. doi: 10.1021/ja308009g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Das D, Sun A, Seidel D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:3765. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (o) Dieckmann A, Richers MT, Platonova AY, Zhang C, Seidel D, Houk KN. J. Org. Chem. 2013;78:4132. doi: 10.1021/jo400483h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (p) Richers MT, Deb I, Platonova AY, Zhang C, Seidel D. Synthesis. 2013;45:1730. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Selected recent examples of redox-neutral amine α-functionalizations: Matyus P, Elias O, Tapolcsanyi P, Polonka-Balint A, Halasz-Dajka B. Synthesis. 2006:2625. Ryabukhin SV, Plaskon AS, Volochnyuk DM, Shivanyuk AN, Tolmachev AA. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:7417. doi: 10.1021/jo0712087. Zheng L, Yang F, Dang Q, Bai X. Org. Lett. 2008;10:889. doi: 10.1021/ol703049j. Che X, Zheng L, Dang Q, Bai X. Synlett. 2008:2373. Barluenga J, Fananas-Mastral M, Aznar F, Valdes C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:6594. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802268. Mori K, Ohshima Y, Ehara K, Akiyama T. Chem. Lett. 2009;38:524. Ruble JC, Hurd AR, Johnson TA, Sherry DA, Barbachyn MR, Toogood PL, Bundy GL, Graber DR, Kamilar GM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:3991. doi: 10.1021/ja808014h. Cui L, Peng Y, Zhang L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:8394. doi: 10.1021/ja903531g. Cui L, Ye L, Zhang L. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:3351. doi: 10.1039/c001314e. Kang YK, Kim SM, Kim DY. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:11847. doi: 10.1021/ja103786c. Zhou G, Zhang J. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:6593. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01946a. Cao WD, Liu XH, Wang WT, Lin LL, Feng XM. Org. Lett. 2011;13:600. doi: 10.1021/ol1028282. Zhou GH, Liu F, Zhang JL. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:3101. doi: 10.1002/chem.201100019. Mori K, Ehara K, Kurihara K, Akiyama T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:6166. doi: 10.1021/ja2014955. He YP, Du YL, Luo SW, Gong LZ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:7064. Mahoney SJ, Fillion E. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:68. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103155. Jurberg ID, Peng B, Woestefeld E, Wasserloos M, Maulide N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:1950. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108639. Han YY, Han WY, Hou X, Zhang XM, Yuan WC. Org. Lett. 2012;14:4054. doi: 10.1021/ol301559k. Chen LJ, Zhang L, Lv J, Cheng JP, Luo SZ. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:8891. doi: 10.1002/chem.201201532. Noey EL, Luo YD, Zhang LM, Houk KN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:1078. doi: 10.1021/ja208860x. Sugiishi T, Nakamura H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:2504. doi: 10.1021/ja211092q. He YP, Wu H, Chen DF, Yu J, Gong LZ. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:5232. doi: 10.1002/chem.201300052.
  • 14.(a) Burns NZ, Baran PS, Hoffmann RW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:2854. doi: 10.1002/anie.200806086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Newhouse T, Baran PS, Hoffmann RW. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:3010. doi: 10.1039/b821200g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dialkyl phosphites are known to act as reducing agents: Hirao T, Masunaga T, Ohshiro Y, Agawa T. J. Org. Chem. 1981;46:3745. Hirao T, Masunaga T, Hayashi K, Ohshiro Y, Agawa T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983;24:399.
  • 16.The competing reduction process in the reaction with diethyl phosphite was also observed with other aldehydes. For instance, mesitaldehyde provided the desired α-functionalized product in a >25:1 ratio and 36% yield, accompanied by 18% of the product resulting from reductive amination. With benzaldehyde, α-functionalized product was obtained in a >25:1 ratio and 47% yield, accompanied by 25% of N-benzyl pyrrolidine.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES