Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2013 Aug 16;68(12):2907–2914. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt295

Risk factors and clinical characteristics of patients with qnr-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia

Chun-Hsing Liao 1, Po-Ren Hsueh 2, George A Jacoby 3, David C Hooper 4,*
PMCID: PMC3820109  PMID: 23956373

Abstract

Objectives

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) caused by qnr genes has been known for 15 years. Information about global distribution and prevalence of qnr genes is abundant, but clinical information concerning infections produced by these isolates and risk factors for their acquisition is limited.

Methods

Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates (n = 227) from a 1 year prospective cohort of patients in Taiwan were studied. MICs of quinolones were determined for all isolates, and multiplex PCR for the presence of PMQR genes and DNA gyrase mutations was applied to all 24 isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L and a control group of 72 isolates with MICs ≤0.06 mg/L.

Results

All qnr isolates were in the group with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L, constituting 9.4% of tested isolates and 3.9% (qnrB 2.6% and qnrS 1.3%) of total isolates. aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qepA were not found. Risk factors for qnr included nosocomial infection, bedridden status, surgery within 3 months, non-K1/K2 serotypes and prior antimicrobial use. Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥0.12 mg/L was associated with prior quinolone use; in contrast, prior cephalosporin use was more closely linked to the presence of qnr. Fourteen-day mortality was similar in patients infected with qnr-positive versus qnr-negative isolates, but there was a trend for increased in-hospital mortality in patients infected with qnr-positive isolates.

Conclusions

In K. pneumoniae blood isolates collected at a hospital in Taiwan, the overall prevalence of qnr genes was 3.9%. Prior quinolone use was linked to increased ciprofloxacin MIC, but not with the prevalence of qnr, which was most strongly linked to exposure to other antimicrobials, especially cephalosporins.

Keywords: K. pneumoniae, PMQR, resistance

Introduction

Quinolones have been used clinically for four decades, and resistance to them has increased over time, mostly due to mutations altering DNA gyrase and the regulation of expression of efflux pumps.1 Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) caused by qnr was first reported in 1998,2 and further studies showed that various qnr genes were distributed in multiple species of Enterobacteriaceae in many countries, although with differing patterns.3 Furthermore, other mechanisms of PMQR, such as a quinolone-modifying enzyme, encoded by aac(6′)-Ib-cr, and plasmid-encoded efflux pumps, including those encoded by qepA and oqxAB, were subsequently found.36

In spite of the abundant information on the global distribution and prevalence of qnr and other PMQR genes, clinical information, including the risk factors for acquiring qnr-harbouring isolates, are limited.7,8 Some studies have demonstrated high percentages of co-existence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) among these isolates.8,9 In order to delineate the risk factors for qnr and its clinical presentations, we used a collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from a previous 1 year prospective cohort of patients with bacteraemia.10 MICs for all isolates of several quinolones were determined, and an extensive survey for PMQR genes and gyrase mutations was performed.

Methods

Demographic information on patients, bacterial isolates and determination of MICs

A prospective study of patients with K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection was performed from 1 January to 31 December 2007 at the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, a tertiary 1050 bed hospital in northern Taiwan. Identification of K. pneumoniae was based on colony morphology and traditional biochemical reactions.11 Each patient was included only once and patients aged <18 years were excluded. The following data were recorded for each patient: age, sex, underlying illness, location of care in the hospital, serum albumin and creatinine levels, past antibiotic use within 1 year and severity of bacteraemia assessed by the Pittsburgh bacteraemia score.12 Malignancy in inactive status was not included as an underlying illness. MICs for all available bacterial isolates of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, nemonoxacin and gatifloxacin were determined by the broth microdilution method.13 Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as controls. Susceptibilities of antimicrobial agents were performed with the disc diffusion method according to the CLSI.14 ESBL phenotype was confirmed by double disc methods. Bacterial serotypes K1 and K2 were determined by cps genotyping.15

PCR and sequencing for possible mechanisms for K. pneumoniae isolates with elevated MICs

Since PMQR genes are associated with a ciprofloxacin MIC ≥0.12 mg/L,3 all isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs >0.06 mg/L were selected for screening by PCRs for quinolone resistance genes, including gyrA, parC, qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib and qepA. Seventy-two isolates with MICs ≤0.06 mg/L were selected randomly as controls (the cases were listed by time of bacteraemia onset, and every third case was picked as a control, with three controls for each case with reduced quinolone susceptibility). In brief, colonies were suspended in 50μL of water in a microcentrifuge tube and boiled to prepare DNA templates for PCR. Pairs of primers to amplify internal fragments were designed from sequences in the NCBI web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and from previous research (Table 1).16 Screening of the PMQR determinants was carried out by two sets of multiplex PCR amplification, one for qnrA, qnrB, qnrC and qnrS and the other for aac(6′)-Ib and qepA. The presence of oqxAB was not studied because most K. pneumoniae carry a chromosomal copy of the gene.17

Table 1.

Primers used in this study

Gene Primer Sequence (5′→3′) Size of the amplified product (bp)
qnrA qnrAF ATTTCTCACGCCAGGATTTG 516
qnrAR GATCGGCAAAGGTTAGGTCA
qnrB qnrBF GATCGTGAAAGCCAGAAAGG 476
qnrBR2 ATGAGCAACGATGCCTGGTA
qnrC qnrCF GGGTTGTACATTTATTGAATCG 307
qnrCR CACCTACCCATTTATTTTCA
qnrS qnrSF GCAAGTTCATTGAACAGGGT 428
qnrSR TCTAAACCGTCGAGTTCGGCG
aac(6′)-Ib aacIbF TTGCGATGCTCTATGAGTGGCTA 482
aacIbR CTCGAATGCCTGGCGTGTTT
qepA qepAF AACTGCTTGAGCCCGTAGAT 596
qepAR GTCTACGCCATGGACCTCAC
gyrA gyrAF AAATCTGCCCGTGTCGTTGGT 344
gyrAR GCCATACCTACGGCGATACC
parC parCF CTGAATGCCAGCGCCAAATT 168
parCR GCGAACGATTTCGGATCGTC

These primers were adapted from the protocol of Kim et al.16

In each multiplex PCR, all of the primers were added to the template DNA and PCR SuperMix high-fidelity polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Clinical isolates that had previously been confirmed to carry the qnr genes, aac(6′)-Ib and qepA were used as positive controls. The PCR conditions used for qnr were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 32 cycles of amplification at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 50°C for 45 s and extension at 72°C for 60 s. The final extension step was at 72°C for 3 min. The PCR conditions used for qepA and aac(6′)-Ib-cr were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 34 cycles of amplification at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 57°C for 45 s and extension at 68°C for 60 s. The final extension step was at 68°C for 10 min. Amplification products were identified by their sizes after electrophoresis on 1.8% agarose gels at 130 V for 30 min and staining with ethidium bromide. Positive results for qnr genes were confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products. All PCR products positive for aac(6′)-Ib were further analysed by digestion with BtsCI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) to identify aac(6′)-Ib-cr, which lacks the BtsCI restriction site present in the wild-type gene.16 The wild-type aac(6′)-Ib PCR product yielded 210 and 272 bp fragments after restriction.

PCR amplifications of the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of gyrA and parC were carried out using the primers shown in Table 1. Purified PCR products were sequenced on both strands, and then QRDR DNA sequences were compared with the sequences of K. pneumoniae (GenBank accession numbers were AF052258 for gyrA and AF303641 for parC).

Statistical analysis

The clinical characteristics of patients with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L were compared with those of patients with ciprofloxacin MICs ≤0.06 mg/L. These groups were chosen because strains with PMQR or gyrase mutation generally have ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L. A similar comparison was performed between isolates with and without qnr. The Mann–Whitney U method was used for continuous variables and the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. Percentages were used for categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was performed for risk factors for qnr. Data were analysed with SPSS software for Windows (Release 15.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Among 231 patients with K. pneumoniae bacteraemia from 1 January to 31 December 2007, 227 isolates were still available. MICs of five quinolones for these isolates were determined (Table 2). Overall, ciprofloxacin and gemifloxacin had the lowest MICs, and the MICs of nemonoxacin were highest. Comparison between patients with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L (n = 24) and MICs ≤0.06 mg/L (n = 203) was performed (Table 3). In the MIC ≥0.12 mg/L group, patients were significantly older and had higher percentages of bedridden status, receiving surgery within 3 months and quinolone exposure within the previous year. All four isolates with an ESBL phenotype confirmed by the double disc method were in the MIC ≥0.12 mg/L group. The Pittsburgh bacteraemia scores, sites of infection, mortality rates, bacterial serotypes and exposure to antibiotics other than quinolones were not statistically different between the two groups.

Table 2.

MICs (mg/L) of five quinolones for 227 K. pneumoniae isolates

Range MIC50 MIC90
Ciprofloxacin 0.015 to ≥32 0.06 0.12
Levofloxacin 0.03 to ≥32 0.12 0.25
Nemonoxacin 0.03 to ≥32 0.25 1
Gemifloxacin 0.03 to ≥32 0.06 0.12
Moxifloxacin 0.03 to ≥32 0.12 0.5

Table 3.

Demographic information on 227 patients with K. pneumoniae bacteraemia based on ciprofloxacin MIC

MIC ≥0.12 mg/L (n = 24), n (%) or mean ± SD MIC ≤0.06 mg/L (n = 203), n (%) or mean ± SD P value
Patient location (place where bacteraemia was detected) 0.07
 emergency department 9 (37.5) 126 (62.1)
 hospital-acquired infection
  ward 10 (41.7) 50 (24.6)
  intensive care unit 5 (20.8) 27 (13.3)
Age (years) 68.4 ± 3.1 60.7 ± 1.1 0.02
Sex (male) 12 (50.0) 135 (66.5) 0.11
Pittsburgh bacteraemia score 4.5 ± 1.0 4.2 ± 0.3 0.77
Time to positivity of culture (hours)a 13.7 ± 2.7 13.1 ± 1.1 0.99
Underlying illness/condition
 diabetes mellitus 11 (45.8) 77 (37.9) 0.45
 cirrhosis 1 (4.2) 32 (15.8) 0.13
 end-stage renal disease 2 (8.3) 8 (3.9) 0.29
 stroke 5 (20.8) 23 (11.3) 0.18
 chronic heart disease 3 (12.5) 42 (20.7) 0.43
bedridden status 10 (41.7) 25 (12.3) <0.001
 active malignancy 5 (20.8) 34 (16.7) 0.62
surgery within 3 months 10 (41.7) 47 (23.2) 0.048
Infection focus
 primary bacteraemia 5 (20.8) 57 (28.1) 0.45
 pneumonia 7 (29.2) 34 (16.7) 0.14
 urinary tract infection 5 (20.8) 31 (15.3) 0.48
 biliary tract infection 3 (12.5) 28 (13.8) 1.00
 liver abscess 2 (8.3) 28 (13.8) 0.75
 intra-abdominal infection 1 (4.2) 13 (6.4) 1.00
 catheter-related bacteraemia 1 (4.2) 5 (2.5) 0.49
 soft tissue infection 0 (0) 3 (1.5) 1.00
 meningitis 0 (0) 3 (1.5) 1.00
 other 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1.00
Outcome
 14 day mortality 6 (25.0) 44 (21.7) 0.71
 in-hospital mortality 10 (41.7) 63 (31.0) 0.29
Bacterial serotype
 K1 2 (8.3) 39 (19.2) 0.27
 K2 1 (4.2) 36 (17.7) 0.39
 non-K1/K2 21 (87.5) 128 (63.1) 0.11
ESBL phenotype 4 (16.7) 0 (0) <0.001
Quinolone use within 1 year 6 (25.0) 13 (6.4) 0.002
Quinolone use within 270 days 6 (25.0) 12 (5.9) 0.001
Quinolone use within 180 days 6 (25.0) 10 (4.9) <0.001
Quinolone use within 90 days 6 (25.0) 6 (3.0) <0.001
Other antibiotic use within 1 year 12 (50.0) 81 (39.9) 0.34
Other antibiotic use within 270 days 12 (50.0) 78 (38.4) 0.27
Other antibiotic use within 180 days 10 (41.7) 74 (36.5) 0.62
Other antibiotic use within 90 days 9 (37.5) 66 (32.5) 0.62

Categories with P values <0.05 appear in bold.

aTime to positivity of culture was acquired using the BACTEC 9240 automated detection blood culture system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, MD, USA), which defines time to positivity as the time from the start of incubation to the start of the alert signal indicating positive blood culture.

Multiplex PCR for PMQR genes was performed in 96 isolates (24 with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L and 72 with ciprofloxacin MICs ≤0.06 mg/L). Nine isolates were found to carry qnr, including six qnrB and three qnrS; all of them were in the MIC ≥0.12 mg/L group. No qnrA or qnrC was identified. Thus, we detected qnr genes in 9.4% of the 96 isolates tested directly. Since all qnr-positive isolates were found in the higher MIC group, the lowest value of which is the lowest known MIC attributable to qnr genes alone and all members of which were tested, it is reasonable to infer that the untested members of the lower MIC group were also negative for qnr genes, thus making the overall prevalence of qnr genes (9/227) 3.9%. Two isolates were found to carry aac(6′)-Ib, but neither of them was aac(6′)-Ib-cr. No isolate was positive for qepA. PCR amplifications of QRDRs (gyrA and parC) were performed for the 24 isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L, and half of them carried gyrase mutations. Seven isolates had a gyrA mutation alone, and five isolates had gyrA and parC mutations together. No parC mutation alone was detected. The ciprofloxacin MICs and molecular mechanisms of quinolone resistance of these isolates are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.

Summary of quinolone resistance mutations and qnr genes found in isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L

No. Ciprofloxacin MIC (mg/L) ESBL qnrB qnrS gyrA mutation parC mutation
50 0.12 no no no nil nil
61 0.12 no no no nil nil
125 0.12 no no no nil nil
172 0.12 no no no nil nil
68 0.25 no no no nil nil
93 0.25 no no no nil nil
134 0.25 no no no nil nil
46 0.25 no yes no nil nil
55 0.5 no no no nil nil
23 0.5 no yes no nil nil
34 0.5 no no no TCC→TAC, Ser83→Tyr nil
191 1 no no no nil nil
189 1 no no yes nil nil
154 1 no no no TCC→TAC, Ser83→Tyr nil
208 4 no yes no TCC→TAC, Ser83→Tyr nil
103 16 no no yes TCC→TTC, Ser83→Phe nil
128 16 no yes no TCC→TTC, Ser83→Phe nil
44 16 yes no no TCC→TTC, Ser83→Phe nil
35 32 no no no TCC→ATC, Ser83→Phe AGC→ATC, Ser80→Ile
9 64 yes no yes TCC→TTC, Ser83→Phe nil
45 64 no yes no TCC→ATC, Ser83→Phe GAA→AAA, Glu84→Lys
21 64 yes no no TCC→ATC, Ser83→Phe AGC→ATC, Ser80→Ile
173 64 no no no TCC→ATC, Ser83→Phe AGC→ATC, Ser80→Ile
104 >128 yes yes no TCC→ATC, Ser83→Phe AGC→ATC, Ser80→Ile

Clinical information for patients with isolates carrying qnr was compared with that for patients without qnr (Table 5). Patients with qnr-positive isolates had a higher percentage of nosocomial infections, bedridden status and surgery within 3 months. No K1 or K2 isolates carried qnr. The percentages of ciprofloxacin MIC ≥1 mg/L, ESBL phenotype and gyrase mutation were higher in the qnr group. Prior exposure to antimicrobials other than quinolones was significantly higher in the qnr group, for any timepoints within 1 year. In contrast, in spite of a trend of increased quinolone exposure in the qnr group, only quinolone use within 90 days was statistically different between the two groups. The relationships of prior antimicrobial exposure and qnr were further analysed with multivariate analysis. After adjusting for age, sex, patient location, bedridden status, surgery within 3 months and bacterial serotypes, there was a trend for non-quinolone antimicrobial exposure linked to the presence of qnr that did not quite reach statistical significance (OR 8.64, 95% CI 0.83–90.18, P = 0.07). In contrast, under the same conditions, quinolone exposure showed no significant association or trend with the presence of qnr (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.39–16.79, P = 0.33).

Table 5.

Comparison of 96 K. pneumoniae isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L, with and without qnr

Positive for qnr (n = 9), n (%) or mean ± SD Negative for qnr (n = 87), n (%) or mean ± SD P value
Patient location (place where bacteraemia was detected) 0.01
 emergency department 1 (11.1) 50 (57.5)
 hospital-acquired infection
  ward 5 (55.6) 30 (34.5)
  intensive care unit 3 (33.3) 7 (8.0)
Age (years) 65.9 ± 3.9 60.5 ± 1.8 0.11
Sex (male) 5 (55.6) 54 (62.1) 0.73
Pittsburgh bacteraemia score 4.3 ± 1.4 3.7 ± 0.5 0.65
Time to positivity of culture (hours) 9.6 ± 1.1 15.5 ± 2.4 0.17
Underlying illness/condition
diabetes mellitus 3 (33.3) 39 (44.8) 0.73
cirrhosis 1 (11.1) 11 (12.6) 1.00
end-stage renal disease 1 (11.1) 3 (3.4) 0.33
stroke 3 (33.3) 9 (10.3) 0.08
chronic heart disease 1 (11.1) 11 (12.6) 1.00
 bedridden status 4 (44.4) 11 (12.6) 0.03
active malignancy 3 (33.3) 14 (16.1) 0.20
 surgery within 3 monthsa 7 (77.8) 18 (20.7) 0.001
Infection focus
primary bacteraemia 2 (22.2) 22 (25.3) 1.00
biliary tract infection 0 (0) 19 (21.8) 0.20
urinary tract infection 3 (33.3) 10 (11.5) 0.10
pneumonia 3 (33.3) 10 (11.5) 0.10
liver abscess 0 (0) 14 (16.1) 0.35
intra-abdominal infection 0 (0) 8 (9.2) 1.00
catheter-related bacteraemia 1 (11.1) 3 (3.4) 0.33
soft tissue infection 0 (0) 2 (2.3) 1.00
Outcome
14 day mortality 2 (22.2) 18 (20.7) 0.10
in-hospital mortality 5 (55.5) 26 (29.9) 0.14
Bacterial serotype
K1 0 (0) 18 (20.7) 0.20
K2 0 (0) 14 (16.1) 0.35
 non-K1/K2 9 (100.0) 55 (63.2) 0.03
Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥1 mg/L 6 (66.7) 5 (5.7) <0.001
ESBL phenotype 2 (22.2) 2 (2.3) 0.04
Gyrase mutation 6 (66.7) 6 (6.9) <0.001
Quinolone use within 1year 3 (33.3) 8 (9.2) 0.07
Quinolone use within 270 days 3 (33.3) 8 (9.2) 0.07
Quinolone use within 180days 3 (33.3) 8 (9.2) 0.07
Quinolone use within 90 days 3 (33.3) 5 (5.7) 0.03
Other antibiotic use within 1 year 8 (88.9) 29 (33.3) 0.002
Other antibiotic use within 270 days 8 (88.9) 28 (32.2) 0.001
Other antibiotic use within 180 days 8 (88.9) 25 (28.7) 0.001
Other antibiotic use within 90 days 7 (77.8) 21 (24.1) 0.002

Categories with P values <0.05 appear in bold.

aIn the qnr group, surgery within 3 months included two urological interventions, two tracheostomies, one neurological surgery, one port-A removal and one wound debridement.

To evaluate the differences between gyrase mutations and isolates carrying qnr, we compared the 24 isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L (Table 6). Gyrase mutation was significantly related to ciprofloxacin MIC ≥1 mg/L and associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate (P = 0.04); in contrast, qnr resistance was associated with higher prior antimicrobial exposure of non-quinolones, particularly cephalosporins. Prior quinolone exposure was not statistically significant. Gyrase mutation or qnr was each associated with cefazolin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin resistance determined by disc methods, but ceftriaxone and aztreonam resistances were only significantly higher in isolates with gyrase mutations. There were six isolates carrying both qnr and gyrase mutations. Compared with the remaining 18 isolates, these isolates were associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate (83% versus 28%, P = 0.05). The mortality rates were 0% for qnr alone (0/3), 22% for isolates without known resistance genes (2/9), 50% for gyrase mutation alone (3/6) and 83% for both qnr and gyrase mutations (5/6).

Table 6.

Comparison of antimicrobial exposures and susceptibilities of 24 K. pneumoniae isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L with or without qnr or gyrase mutation

Positive for qnr (n = 9), n (%) Negative for qnr (n = 15), n (%) P value Positive for gyrase mutation (n = 12), n (%) Negative for gyrase mutation (n = 12), n (%) P value
Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥1 mg/L 7 (77.8) 6 (40.0) 0.11 11 (91.7) 2 (16.7) 0.001
14 day mortality 2 (22.2) 3 (20.0) 1.00 3 (25.0) 2 (16.7) 1.00
In-hospital mortality 5 (55.6) 5 (33.3) 0.40 8 (66.7) 2 (16.7) 0.04
Quinolone use within 1 year 3 (33.3) 3 (20.0) 0.64 4 (33.3) 2 (16.7) 0.64
Quinolone use within 270 days 3 (33.3) 3 (20.0) 0.64 4 (33.3) 2 (16.7) 0.64
Quinolone use within 180 days 3 (33.3) 3 (20.0) 0.64 4 (33.3) 2 (16.7) 0.64
Quinolone use within 90 days 3 (33.3) 3 (20.0) 0.64 4 (33.3) 2 (16.7) 0.64
ESBL phenotype 2 (22.2) 2 (13.3) 0.62 4 (33.3) 0 (0) 0.09
Other antibiotic use within 1 year 8 (88.9) 4 (26.7) 0.009 7 (58.3) 5 (41.7) 0.41
Other antibiotic use within 270 days 8 (88.9) 4 (26.7) 0.009 7 (58.3) 5 (41.7) 0.68
Other antibiotic use within 180 days 8 (88.9) 2 (13.3) <0.001 5 (41.7) 5 (41.7) 1.00
Other antibiotic use within 90 days 7 (77.8) 2 (13.3) 0.003 5 (41.7) 4 (33.3) 1.00
Antimicrobial exposed other than quinolones
 cephalosporin 6 (66.7) 4 (26.7) 0.04 6 (50.0) 4 (33.3) 0.68
penicillin 2 (22.2) 0 (0) 0.13 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 1.00
aminoglycoside 1 (11.1) 0 (0) 0.38 0 (0) 1 (8.3) 1.00
carbapenem 1 (11.1) 1 (6.7) 1.00 2 (16.7) 0 (0) 0.48
glycopeptide 1 (11.1) 1 (6.7) 1.00 2 (16.7) 0 (0) 0.48
fluconazole 2 (22.2) 1 (6.7) 0.53 3 (25.0) 0 (0) 0.22
Antimicrobial resistance (disc diffusion method)
 cefazolin 6 (66.7) 4 (26.7) 0.04 8 (66.7) 2 (16.7) 0.04
 ceftriaxone 3 (33.3) 2 (13.3) 0.33 5 (41.7) 0 (0) 0.04
cefepime 2 (22.2) 2 (13.3) 0.62 4 (33.3) 0 (0) 0.09
 gentamicin 6 (66.7) 4 (26.7) 0.04 9 (75.0) 1 (8.3) 0.003
amikacin 2 (22.2) 1 (6.7) 0.53 3 (25.0) 0 (0) 0.22
ampicillin/sulbactam 6 (66.7) 6 (40.0) 0.40 8 (66.7) 4 (33.3) 0.22
piperacillin/tazobactam 4 (44.4) 3 (20.0) 0.36 6 (50.0) 1 (8.3) 0.07
 ciprofloxacin 8 (88.9) 4 (26.7) 0.009 10 (83.3) 2 (16.7) 0.003
 aztreonam 3 (33.3) 3 (20.0) 0.64 6 (50.0) 0 (0) 0.01
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 7 (77.8) 10 (66.7) 0.67 11 (91.7) 6 (50.0) 0.07
ertapenem 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Categories with P values <0.05 appear in bold.

Discussion

Prior quinolone use is considered one of the major driving forces of quinolone resistance.1822 In this study, we show that in a cohort of patients with K. pneumoniae bacteraemia, elevated ciprofloxacin MIC was correlated with prior quinolone exposure. Moreover, when we focused on isolates with higher MICs due to gyrase mutation or the presence of qnr, we were surprised to find that the presence of qnr is strongly correlated with cephalosporin and other non-quinolone antimicrobial exposure. Although the occurrence of qnr genes was relatively low in the population studied, their association with prior exposure to non-quinolone antimicrobials within 90 days to 1 year remained statistically strong (Table 5). In contrast, a weaker association of qnr with prior quinolone exposure was only seen at 90 days. The relative strengths of these associations, however, may have been affected by the almost 4-fold greater exposure to non-quinolones than quinolones (39% versus 11%) in the group analysed. In Taiwan, antimicrobials including quinolones can only be obtained by prescription. In a report analysing risk factors for qnr in Enterobacteriaceae, Chong et al.8 found that prior aminoglycoside and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use, but not quinolone use, was associated with the presence of qnr. Both observations could be related to the frequent occurrence of qnr on plasmids containing multiple other resistance genes, including those for ESBLs that provide resistance to cephalosporins.8,9

The prevalence rates of qnrB and qnrS in this study were both somewhat lower (2.6% and 1.3%, respectively) than those in a previous report (5.9% and 2.8%, respectively) among K. pneumoniae blood isolates in Taiwan.9 In that report, the prevalence of qnrB4 isolates increased from 0% in 1999 to 7.6% in 2005, probably due to horizontal transfer of qnr genes.9 In one Korean 9 year study15 and another study in Israel,23 there were also trends of increasing qnr among Enterobacteriaceae over time. Community-acquired infection constituted more than half of the cases in our study, and none of the K1 or K2 isolates, which were considered more likely as community strains in previous study,24 was found to carry qnr. This circumstance might explain the low prevalence of qnr in this cohort and support the idea that qnr is selected in patients with healthcare exposure and the use of antimicrobials.

There has been limited clinical information about patients with qnr-harbouring isolates. In a comparison of qnr-positive K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. with qnr-negative isolates,8 malignancy was a risk factor for qnr, and the use of any antibiotics within 30 days and ESBL production were more common in the qnr-positive group. In our study, the risk factors for qnr included nosocomial infection, bedridden status, surgery within 3 months, non-K1/K2 serotypes and prior antimicrobial use. The differences between the two studies may be explained, at least in part, by the different populations studied, as community-acquired infection accounted for only 15.4% of the earlier cohort, in contrast to community K. pneumoniae infection, which is endemic in Taiwan.24 Both studies, however, showed that prior antimicrobial use was an important risk factor.

In patients infected with qnr-positive isolates, the 14 day mortality rate was similar to that for qnr-negative isolates, and the in-hospital mortality rate was somewhat higher but not significantly different, consistent with an earlier report.8 In contrast, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the gyrase mutation group. In this study, only 20 patients received empirical quinolone (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin or moxifloxacin) therapy, and 7 patients received quinolone as definitive therapy. Among patients who received empirical quinolone therapy, only two had ciprofloxacin MICs ≥0.12 mg/L (MICs of 64 and 0.5 mg/L), and both of them died in spite of combination therapy with quinolone and β-lactam (one with pneumonia and one with primary bacteraemia). In the same group, five patients died in spite of having infections caused by isolates with low ciprofloxacin MIC (≤0.06 mg/L). All patients who received quinolone as definitive therapy survived. Thus, the correlation of gyrase mutation and mortality would likely reflect the underlying conditions of these patients.

There are several limitations of this study. First, it was a 1 year study from a single hospital in an area where community-onset K. pneumoniae infection was endemic. Geographical differences in K. pneumoniae infection can be anticipated.24 Second, the information on prior antimicrobial exposure was obtained from medical records at our hospital. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that some patients might have received offsite antimicrobial exposure prior to the bacteraemic episode. Nonetheless, we included all antimicrobials used within 1 year to maximize the probable effects of prior antimicrobial exposure. Third, we screened only qnrA, qnrB, qnrC and qnrS. qnrD was not included in the screen, but it has not previously been reported in K. pneumoniae.

In conclusion, in this 1 year study the overall prevalence of qnr genes was 3.9%. Risk factors for qnr alleles included nosocomial infections, bedridden status, surgery within 3 months, non-K1/K2 serotypes and prior antimicrobial use. Most notably, prior cephalosporin use was more closely linked to the presence of qnr than to prior quinolone use, suggesting that other resistance genes that broaden the resistance phenotypes of qnr-containing strains may have a greater effect on qnr prevalence than the low-level quinolone resistance that qnr itself provides.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a grant from the US Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, AI R01-AI057576 (to D. C. H. and G. A. J.). Salary support for C.-H. L. was provided by the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.

Transparency declarations

None to declare.

References

  • 1.Hooper DC, Wolfson JS. Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:384–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Martínez-Martínez L, Pascual A, Jacoby GA. Quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid. Lancet. 1998;351:797–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07322-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Strahilevitz J, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC, et al. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:664–89. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Jacoby GA, et al. Fluoroquinolone modifying enzyme: a novel adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat Med. 2006;12:83–8. doi: 10.1038/nm1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yamane K, Wachino JI, Suzuki S, et al. New plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone efflux pump, QepA, found in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3354–60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00339-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hansen LH, Johannesen E, Burmolle M, et al. Plasmid-encoded multidrug efflux pump conferring resistance to olaquindox in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3332–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3332-3337.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Sahm DF, et al. qnr prevalence in ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2872–4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01647-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chong YP, Choi SH, Kim ES, et al. Bloodstream infections caused by qnr-positive Enterobacteriaceae: clinical and microbiologic characteristics and outcomes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;67:70–7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu JJ, Ko WC, Wu HM, et al. Prevalence of Qnr determinants among bloodstream isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Taiwanese hospital, 1999–2005. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:1234–9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liao CH, Lai CC, Hsu MS, et al. Correlation between time to positivity of blood cultures with clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia: prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:1119–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abbott SL. Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Serratia, Plesiomonas, and other Enterobacteriaceae. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, et al., editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 9th edn. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2003. pp. 684–700. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chow JW, Fine MJ, Shlaes DM, et al. Enterobacter bacteremia: clinical features and emergence of antibiotic resistance during therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:585–90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-8-585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Seventeenth Informational Supplement M100-S17. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests—Ninth Edition: Approved Standard M2-A9. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pan YJ, Fang HC, Yang HC, et al. Capsular polysaccharide synthesis regions in Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype K57 and a new capsular serotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2231–40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01716-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim HB, Park CH, Kim CJ, et al. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants over a nine-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:639–45. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01051-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim HB, Wang M, Park CH, et al. oqxAB encoding a multidrug efflux pump in human clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3582–4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01574-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pena C, Albareda JM, Pallares R, et al. Relationship between quinolone use and emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli in bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:520–4. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.2.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Muder RR, Brennen C, Goetz AM, et al. Association with prior fluoroquinolone therapy of widespread ciprofloxacin resistance among Gram-negative isolates in a Veterans Affairs medical center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:256–8. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.2.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paterson DL, Mulazimoglu L, Casellas JM, et al. Epidemiology of ciprofloxacin resistance and its relationship to extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:473–8. doi: 10.1086/313719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lautenbach E, Strom BL, Bilker WB, et al. Epidemiological investigation of fluoroquinolone resistance in infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1288–94. doi: 10.1086/322667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bolon MK, Wright SB, Gold HS, et al. The magnitude of the association between fluoroquinolone use and quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae may be lower than previously reported. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1934–40. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.1934-1940.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Strahilevitz J, Engelstein D, Adler A, et al. Changes in qnr prevalence and fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. collected from 1990 to 2005. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3001–3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00256-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yu WL, Hansen DS, Ko WC, et al. Virulence characteristics of Klebsiella and clinical manifestations of K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:986–93. doi: 10.3201/eid1307.070187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES