Skip to main content
Advances in Nutrition logoLink to Advances in Nutrition
. 2013 Nov 6;4(6):711–717. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004770

Treatment of Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver Disease: The Role of Lipid Emulsions1,2,3

Prathima Nandivada 1, Sarah J Carlson 1, Melissa I Chang 1, Eileen Cowan 1, Kathleen M Gura 1, Mark Puder 1,*
PMCID: PMC3823519  PMID: 24228202

Abstract

Parenteral nutrition is a life-saving therapy for infants with intestinal failure. However, long-term parenteral nutrition carries the risk of progressive liver disease. Substantial data has implicated components of parenteral soybean oil in the pathogenesis of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD). Elevated serum concentrations of phytosterols, an abundance of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a relative paucity of α-tocopherol have been associated with the risk of cholestasis and hepatic injury observed in PNALD. Currently available treatment strategies include the reduction of the dose of administered parenteral soybean oil and/or the replacement of parenteral soybean oil with alternative parenteral lipid emulsions. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with the development of PNALD and the data evaluating currently available treatment strategies.

Introduction

Parenteral nutrition has revolutionized the care of infants with intestinal failure by providing life-sustaining calories in the setting of inadequate absorption of enteral nutrients. However, long-term parenteral nutrition carries the risk of a progressive and potentially life-threatening liver disease (1). Parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD) presents with jaundice and failure to thrive in children dependent on parenteral nutrition (2). PNALD is initially histologically characterized by intrahepatic cholestasis but can progress to fibrosis and cirrhosis with continued exposure to parenteral nutrition. Histologic evidence of cholestasis can be seen within 2 wk after starting parenteral nutrition. Varying degrees of fibrosis occur in the majority of children receiving parenteral nutrition for >6 wk (3). However, the diagnosis of PNALD is often made noninvasively by using biochemical markers. Commonly used criteria in children dependent on parenteral nutrition include 2 consecutive measurements of direct bilirubin >2 mg/dL without other causes of hepatic dysfunction (4,5).

PNALD occurs in 43–74% of infants with intestinal failure and can be fatal if treatment is delayed (5,6). Risk factors for the development of PNALD include preterm birth, low birth weight, macronutrient excess, trace element imbalances, frequent surgical procedures, lack of enteral feeding, prolonged use of parenteral nutrition, and recurrent sepsis from central venous catheter-associated infections (7). Over the last decade, the source of lipids has emerged as a major risk factor in the pathogenesis of PNALD, with substantial evidence indicating that harmful components of parenteral soybean oil contribute to the development of PNALD. Unfortunately, the only available FDA-approved parenteral lipid emulsion in the United States is composed of soybean oil (Intralipid, Fresenius Kabi).

Until recently, the primary treatment for children with PNALD was to stop parenteral nutrition and provide full nutrition enterally. However, tolerance of full enteral nutrition in children with intestinal failure may require prolonged intestinal rehabilitation over a period of years (8). Historically, infants unable to wean from parenteral nutrition and soybean oil to full enteral nutrition frequently developed end-stage liver disease and required liver and/or small bowel transplantation for survival (9). New insights into the pathogenesis of PNALD and the introduction of alternative lipid sources have allowed for the evolution of the management of PNALD. Progression of PNALD to end-stage liver disease is now rare and the need for liver transplantation has markedly decreased (10). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with the development of PNALD and currently available treatment strategies.

Parenteral Lipids in the Pathogenesis of PNALD

To prevent essential fatty acid deficiency and promote growth, patients dependent on parenteral nutrition also require parenteral lipids. However, the provision of lipids via the parenteral route causes metabolic disturbances that may predispose patients to hepatic dysfunction. Lipid metabolism in the liver depends on the route of administration. Lipids given enterally are absorbed by the enterocyte in the form of a micelle and packaged into chylomicrons for metabolism by the liver. Although the lipid particles in parenteral soybean oil emulsion mimic the size and structure of chylomicrons, they primarily contain omega-6 (n–6) PUFAs and TGs and are devoid of cholesterol or protein. With reduced cholesterol, lipolysis is limited and the liver is prone to the accumulation of lipid particles (11). Javid et al. (12) demonstrated this concept by inducing essential fatty acid deficiency in mice and subsequently providing lipids by either the enteral or parenteral route. Enteral lipid supplementation was protective against hepatic steatosis in a dose-dependent manner, whereas persistent and severe steatosis was observed with parenteral lipid administration.

Several components specific to soybean oil have also been proposed to contribute to the development of PNALD. Notably, soybean oil is rich in phytosterols, which are plant-derived steroid compounds structurally similar to cholesterol (13). When plant products are consumed enterally, absorption of phytosterols is limited to 5–10% with limited excretion by conversion to bile acids (1416). However, when plant products are given via the parenteral route, phytosterols are fully bioavailable with the same limitations in excretion, allowing the development of high, nonphysiologic, serum concentrations. Clayton et al. (17) demonstrated that for children with severe PNALD, plasma concentrations of phytosterols were as high as those in patients with hereditary phytosterolemia, reaching concentrations equal to or higher than in samples of 20% undiluted Intralipid. With a decrease in lipid intake, patients had lower plasma phytosterol concentrations and an associated improvement in liver function tests. Similarly, Ellegård et al. (18) demonstrated that patients with intestinal failure receiving parenteral nutrition had phytosterol concentrations over 5 times that of patients with intestinal failure that were not receiving parenteral nutrition and over 2 times that of healthy control patients. These studies and others show that high concentrations of serum phytosterols in parenteral nutrition-dependent children are correlated with PNALD and the severity of cholestasis (15,18,19). Prolonged use of parenteral soybean oil may lead to accumulation of phytosterol content in cell membranes and plasma lipoproteins and is associated with cholestasis in this population (17). Similarly, increased plasma phytosterol concentrations have been observed in infants receiving olive oil-based parenteral lipid emulsions (20).

The mechanisms by which phytosterols contribute to the development of PNALD remain under investigation. Administration of phytosterols in neonatal piglets increases serum bile acids and reduces bile acid-dependent bile flow, resulting in the development of cholestasis. Newborn piglets receiving phytosterol-free fish oil maintain normal bile flow and liver function tests (21,22). Furthermore, stimgasterol, the most abundant phytosterol in soybean oil, is an antagonist of the Farsenoid X Receptor (FXR) (23). Ligand-bound FXR normally suppresses 7-α-hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme of bile acid synthesis (24,25). In murine models of cholestasis, mice receiving a synthetic FXR agonist, GW4064, had a significant improvement in hepatic transaminase concentrations. Marked decreases in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and a trend toward a decrease in bilirubin concentrations were noted in the mice that received the FXR agonist. Additionally, rats treated with GW4064 had less hepatocellular necrosis, inflammation, and bile duct proliferation on a liver biopsy than did rats treated with vehicle only (26). These studies suggest that an FXR agonist may be hepatoprotective and that phytosterols may contribute to the development of cholestasis by downregulating the suppression of bile acid synthesis.

In addition, the lipid content of soybean oil is primarily composed of ω-6 PUFAs. Both ω-6 PUFAs and ω-3 (n–3) PUFAs serve as precursors of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory eicosanoids and prostaglandins (27). Increased or excess intake of ω-6 PUFAs, especially linoleic acid, results in higher amounts of proinflammatory mediators (e.g., nuclear factor-κB, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α) (28,29). Arachidonic acid, one the major downstream metabolites of linoleic acid (ω-6 PUFA), is the key substrate for the synthesis of 2-series prostaglandins and thromboxanes via the cyclooxygenase pathway and the 4-series leukotrienes via the lipoxgenase pathway (27). The products of those pathways promote inflammation by secreting IL-6, which is involved in leukocyte chemotaxis and vasodilation. More importantly, the most potent of these downstream products, prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4, have been shown to play active roles in chronic inflammatory diseases such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis (30). It should be noted, however, that arachidonic acid is also a precursor for epoxyeicosatrienoic acids via the cytochrome 450 pathway, known to reduce inflammation by decreasing leukocyte adhesion and downregulating nuclear factor-κB (31,32). However, ω-6 PUFAs predominantly give rise to proinflammatory mediators, whereas ω-3 PUFA-derived mediators are largely antiinflammatory (27). EPA, which is derived from α-linolenic acid (an ω-3 PUFA), acts as a competing substrate for the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways as previously described, producing 3-series prostaglandins and thromboxanes and 5-series leukotrienes, respectively (33). These mediators tend to be more antiinflammatory, thereby countering the ω-6 PUFA products in the inflammatory cascade. EPA and its downstream product, DHA, bind to PPARα/γ and G-protein coupled receptors GPR-120 and GPR-40, resulting in a downregulation of nuclear factor-κB and inhibition of inflammatory pathways (34,35).

The source of parenteral lipids administered appears to influence the inflammatory milieu in animal models of PNALD. Yeh et al. (36) compared serum inflammatory markers in rats receiving either parenteral safflower oil (plant based) or fish oil, showing higher concentrations of thromboxane A2, a potent proinflammatory agent, in rats receiving parenteral safflower oil. Lee et al. (37) examined mice consuming an enteral diet of either menhaden oil (ω-3 PUFAs) or soybean oil (ω-6 PUFAs) after bile duct ligation. At 4 and 8 d, the mice fed the soybean oil had more histologic evidence of inflammation, apoptosis, and necrosis compared with mice fed mehaden oil. Liver function tests were similar between the groups. Similarly, Chen et al. (38) studied the extent of hepatic injury after bile duct ligation in rats fed standard chow and given i.p. injections of either DHA or saline. The rats in the DHA group had downregulation of nuclear factor-κB expression, reduced leukocyte accumulation, and decreased fibrogenesis. Therefore, induction of a proinflammatory milieu by parenteral soybean oil administration may contribute to the hepatic inflammation associated with PNALD.

Parenteral soybean oil is also relatively deplete in α-tocopherol, a potent antioxidant (39). Oxidative stress occurs when cellular by-products of reactive oxygen species and hydrogen peroxide are not utilized or neutralized within the cell (40). In conjunction with antioxidant enzymes (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase), antioxidants (e.g., glutathione, tocopherol, and ascorbic acid) scavenge for these prooxidant species and neutralize them into stable products (41). Oxidative stress has been proposed as the “second hit” in hepatosteatosis, leading to cellular injury and hepatic apoptosis secondary to abnormal fat accumulation (42). In the study by Kalish et al. (43), a metabolomic analysis of mice receiving oral parenteral nutrition and either parenteral soybean oil or fish oil, lower concentrations of α-tocopherol and higher concentrations of lipid peroxidation products were found in the soybean oil group. Similarly, Hong et al. (44) reported that rabbits receiving parenteral soybean oil had decreased superoxide dismutase activity (an antioxidant enzyme), increased lipid peroxidation, and increased apoptosis compared with rabbits receiving parenteral saline.

Current Strategies for the Treatment of PNALD

Growing evidence implicating parenteral soybean oil in the pathogenesis of PNALD has contributed to the evolution of management strategies for children with PNALD. Two approaches have been proposed for the treatment of PNALD: lipid restriction and lipid modification. Lipid restriction reduces the extent of exposure to parenteral soybean oil and may attenuate the deleterious effects described above. Lipid modification replaces parenteral soybean oil with parenteral fish oil.

Lipid restriction.

Traditionally, parenteral soybean oil has been administered at a dose of 2–3 g/(kg · d) (45). However, in recent years, some institutions have utilized reduced lipid dosing in an effort to decrease the incidence of PNALD (4648). Studies have shown a decrease in the incidence of PNALD when lipid dose is decreased to ≤1 g/(kg · d) (5,49). However, the developmental consequences of the restriction of essential fatty acids on a growing neonate are unclear. In 2012, Cober et al. (49) examined serum bilirubin concentrations, growth, and essential fatty acid deficiency in infants receiving parenteral nutrition with parenteral lipids at 3 g/(kg · d) compared with those receiving parenteral nutrition with parenteral lipids at 1 g/(kg · d) twice weekly. Infants in the lipid restriction group were found to have a significant reduction in total bilirubin concentrations during the 8 wk of treatment [change in slope of −0.73 mg/(dL · wk) vs. 0.29 mg/(dL · wk), respectively, n = 31/group; P = 0.0017]. Weight and head circumference age-adjusted Z-scores were found to be the same between groups. However, 8 of 13 patients had an increased triene: tetraene ratio (>0.05 but <0.2), suggesting a trend toward essential fatty acid deficiency. Considering the importance of lipids in early brain development, even mild essential fatty acid deficiency may have long-term deleterious consequences for the growing infant (50,51).

Sanchez et al. (5) reported outcomes in patients who received a decrease in parenteral lipid dosing from 2–3 g/(kg · d) to 1 g/(kg · d). Infants treated with the reduced lipid dose were found to have a significantly lower incidence of PNALD compared with infants treated with the higher lipid dose (22% vs. 43%, n = 132 and 82 respectively; P = 0.003). Weight gain and weight-for-age at discharge were found to be the same between groups. Although no patient was found to develop clinical signs of essential fatty acid deficiency, screening for biochemical essential fatty acid deficiency was not performed in this study.

In a prospective, randomized controlled trial, Rollins et al. (52) randomly assigned infants >26 wk gestation who received at least 50% of calories from parenteral nutrition to standard [3 g/(kg · d)] or reduced [1 g/(kg · d) ] lipid dosing. Outcome measures of the study included biomarkers of liver function, growth, and serum fatty acid concentrations. Infants in the reduced lipid dose group were found to have a lower rate of increase in conjugated bilirubin from baseline (0 vs. 1.3 mg/dL; P = 0.04) compared with the standard dosing group. The weight-for-age Z-score was found to increase at a higher rate in the standard dosing group (0 vs. −0.06; P = 0.02) compared with the reduced group. However, the enrollees in this study were not dependent on parenteral nutrition for total caloric intake. Furthermore, the percent of calories from enteral sources was variable, with study participants receiving breast milk, formula, or both, making these results of uncertain significance with regard to the population of infants dependent on PN for all of their caloric needs.

However, a study by Nehra et al. (53) demonstrated no difference in the incidence of cholestasis in surgical neonates treated with i.v. lipids at 1 g/(kg · d) vs. 2–3 g/(kg · d) (51.7% vs. 43.8%, n = 29 and 32, respectively; P = 0.61). There was also no difference between groups in the time to onset of cholestasis, with patients developing cholestasis in 32.6 ± 24.1 d in the lipid reduction group and 27.7 ± 10.6 d, in the standard lipid dosing group (P = 0.48).

More studies are needed to determine whether lipid restriction is efficacious for the prevention of PNALD. In addition, careful attention should be paid to neurological and behavioral outcomes in children receiving long-term PN with respect to lipid dose. The importance of ω-3 PUFAs in brain development is highlighted in the lipid composition of the brain, which is 50% DHA by neuronal membrane weight (51). Term infants benefit from the transfer of large amounts of DHA late in the third trimester (54). However, preterm infants are relatively deplete in these important fatty acids and especially at risk of fatty acid deficiencies with intestinal failure. Supplementation of long-chain PUFAs does not significantly improve intelligence or visual development in preterm infants receiving full enteral nutrition (55). However, the consequences of under-provision of fatty acids in infants receiving full parenteral nutrition on neurological outcomes is unknown. Published recommendations for enteral DHA and arachidonic acid dietary content are 0.2% of total fatty acids for term infants and 0.35% for preterm infants (56). Parenteral soybean oil provides DHA and arachidonic acid as 0.2% of total fatty acids (Intralipid, Fresenius Kabi). Although this is sufficient for term infants, preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition at the standard dose of lipids [2–3 g/(kg · d)] may not be receiving sufficient PUFAs compared with enterally fed preterm infants. Lipid restriction in preterm infants for the prevention of PNALD may further reduce the amount of DHA and arachidonic acid provided. Additional studies are required to ensure that the lipid reduction is safe and sufficient for brain development and growth in preterm infants dependent on parenteral nutrition.

Lipid modification: fish oil monotherapy.

Parenteral fish oil (Omegaven, Fresenius Kabi) was introduced to the United States in 2004 for compassionate use in treating preexisting PNALD. The first use of parenteral fish oil therapy for PNALD was reported by Gura et al. (57), where 2 infants experienced resolution of cholestasis and improvement in liver function after replacement of parenteral soybean oil with fish oil. One of the 2 patients was removed from the waiting list for liver transplantation due to the observed clinical improvement. Subsequently, Gura et al. (4) reported outcomes in 18 infants treated with fish oil that were compared with a historical cohort of 21 infants treated with soybean oil. The fish oil group had 2 deaths and no transplants, whereas the soybean oil group had 7 deaths and 2 liver transplants. Puder et al. (58) subsequently reported outcomes in contemporary cohorts, where 42 children were treated with fish oil and 49 children were treated with soybean oil. Children receiving parenteral fish oil exhibited resolution of cholestasis 8.6 times faster than children receiving soybean oil. A significant decrease in mortality and/or transplantation was observed in the fish oil group compared with the soybean oil group (9.5% vs. 34.7%, respectively; P = 0.005). Increased survival was noted in the fish oil group despite the fact that children within the fish oil group were more premature in birth, had longer exposure to parenteral nutrition, and had a higher mean direct bilirubin at initiation of fish oil than children in the soybean oil group. Liver transplantation was performed in 6 infants in the soybean oil group, whereas none were required in the fish oil group. Small case reports of infants with intestinal failure and PNALD from other institutions have also demonstrated resolution of cholestasis and survival after replacement of parenteral soybean oil with fish oil (5961).

Premkumar et al. (62) reported outcomes in 57 infants treated for PNALD with parenteral fish oil between 2007 and 2011. All infants were under the age of 6 mo at initiation of fish oil and most were born preterm (median gestational age of 28 wk). Cholestasis resolved with fish oil therapy in 82.5% of infants. Ten infants died during the study period, though none of the deaths were due to complications of fish oil therapy or liver failure. Nine of the 10 infants who died did not demonstrate resolution of cholestasis: 3 had end-stage liver disease prior to treatment with fish oil and 4 died after redirection of care due to poor prognosis from multiple comorbidities.

Several biochemical mechanisms have been proposed to explain the beneficial potential of parenteral fish oil in the management of PNALD. Fish oil supplementation decreases hepatosteatosis by inducing signaling pathways that inhibit de novo lipogenesis and stimulate the β-oxidation of fatty acids (63). Therefore, parenteral fish oil may be less likely to accumulate in the liver than parenteral soybean oil. In addition, unlike soybean oil, parenteral fish oil contains no phytosterols and may not trigger the cholestasis associated with high concentrations of serum phytosterols. Fish oil is also rich in ω-3 PUFAs and tocopherols, which may result in less inflammation and oxidative stress. Chen et al. (38) reported reduced hepatic inflammation, ductal proliferation, and fibrosis in rats fed a diet rich in DHA compared with standard rodent chow after common bile duct ligation. Decreased lipid peroxidation and elevated antioxidant enzymes were also noted in the DHA-rich diet group. Other animal models of PNALD have demonstrated similar decreases in inflammation, oxidative stress, and cholestasis with oral and/or parenteral fish oil administration (36,43,44). Furthermore, downstream metabolites of ω-3 PUFAs, called resolvins, protectins, and maresins, have been identified as active mediators of the resolution of inflammation (64). González-Périz et al. (65) reported that administration of resolvin E1 to mice that are genetically predisposed to fatty liver resulted in decreased hepatosteatosis and hepatic inflammation. These mechanisms in concert may explain the benefits of parenteral fish oil in the treatment of PNALD, though the absence of parenteral soybean oil may be the dominant benefit.

Lipid modification: mixed lipid emulsions.

The utility of newly developed mixed lipid emulsions in the treatment of PNALD is also under investigation, though results have not been as dramatic as those seen with fish oil monotherapy. SMOFlipid (Fresenius Kabi) is a mixed lipid emulsion containing 30% soybean oil, 30% medium-chain TGs, 25% olive oil, and 15% fish oil. Muhammed et al. (66) evaluated the use of SMOFlipid in the treatment of PNALD, defined as a persistently elevated bilirubin of 4.1 mg/dL. Outcomes were compared in 8 children with PNALD treated with the mixed lipid emulsion (SMOFlipid) and 9 children who received parenteral soybean oil only in the 3-y period prior to the availability of SMOFlipid. After 6 mo of therapy, there was no significant difference in median bilirubin between the 2 groups, with a median bilirubin of 1.1 mg/dL (range 0.35–12.5 mg/dL) in the SMOFlipid group and 10.8 mg/dL (range 0.6–15.7 mg/dL) in the Intralipid group. (P = 0.058). However, there was a difference in Δ median bilirubin, with a decrease of 5.8 mg/dL in the SMOFlipid group and an increase of 4.6 mg/dL in the Intralipid group.

The use of Clinoleic (Baxter), composed of 80% olive oil and 20% soybean oil, in combination with parenteral fish oil (Omegaven) has also been studied for the treatment of PNALD. Angsten et al. (67) compared morbidity and mortality in 20 infants treated with a 1:1 ratio of Clinoleic and Omegaven with a historical cohort of 18 infants treated with Intralipid only. They observed a decreased mortality from liver failure in the mixed lipid group (10%) compared with the parenteral soybean oil group (33%). Cholestasis resolved in all surviving patients in the mixed lipid group but in only 2 surviving patients in the soybean oil group. Liver transplantation was not required for any children in either treatment group. These studies suggest that mixed lipid emulsions may provide some benefit to children with PNALD, though none have compared outcomes with fish oil monotherapy.

In conclusion, long-term parenteral nutrition is a life-saving therapy for children with intestinal failure but carries the risk of life-threatening liver disease. Although the pathogenesis of PNALD is multifactorial, the increased phytosterols, proinflammatory ω-6 PUFAs, and oxidative stress associated with parenteral soybean oil may all contribute to this disease. Current strategies for the treatment of PNALD include reduction in the dose of administered parenteral soybean oil and/or replacement of soybean oil with alternative lipid emulsions. Results have been mixed for lipid restriction strategies, though some institutions utilize lower doses of soybean oil due to the potential benefits. Fish oil monotherapy is an effective and safe treatment for PNALD, with multiple studies demonstrating its use associated with resolution of cholestasis and reduction in mortality and morbidity. The use of mixed lipid emulsions for the treatment of PNALD is under investigation. Available studies suggest that mixed lipid emulsions are associated with less cholestasis and mortality than parenteral soybean oil therapy. However, the efficacy of mixed lipid emulsions and fish oil monotherapy has not been directly compared. Furthermore, studies with long-term follow-up and a focus on children with advanced PNALD and cirrhosis are lacking and needed.

Acknowledgments

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Literature Cited

  • 1.Kelly DA. Intestinal failure-associated liver disease: what do we know today? Gastroenterology. 2006;130(2 Suppl 1):S70–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaufman SS. Prevention of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in children. Pediatr Transplant. 2002;6:37–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zambrano E, El-Hennawy M, Ehrenkranz RA, Zelterman D, Reyes-Múgica M. Total parenteral nutrition induced liver pathology: an autopsy series of 24 newborn cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7:425–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gura KM, Lee S, Valim C, Zhou J, Kim S, Modi BP, Arsenault DA, Strijbosch RAM, Lopes S, Duggan C, et al. Safety and efficacy of a fish-oil-based fat emulsion in the treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e678–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sanchez SE, Braun LP, Mercer LD, Sherrill M, Stevens J, Javid PJ. The effect of lipid restriction on the prevention of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in surgical infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:573–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Squires RH, Duggan C, Teitelbaum DH, Wales PW, Balint J, Venick R, Rhee S, Sudan D, Mercer D, Martinez JA, et al. Natural history of pediatric intestinal failure: initial report from the Pediatric Intestinal Failure Consortium. J Pediatr. 2012;161:723–8.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beath SV, Davies P, Papadopoulou A, Khan AR, Buick RG, Corkery JJ, Gornall P, Booth IW. Parenteral nutrition-related cholestasis in postsurgical neonates: multivariate analysis of risk factors. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:604–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Infantino BJ, Mercer DF, Hobson BD, Fischer RT, Gerhardt BK, Grant WJ, Langnas AN, Quiros-Tejeira RE. Successful rehabilitation in pediatric ultrashort small bowel syndrome. J Pediatr. Epub 2013. July 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chan S, McCowen KC, Bistrian BR, Thibault A, Keane-Ellison M, Forse RA, Babineau T, Burke P. Incidence, prognosis, and etiology of end-stage liver disease in patients receiving home total parenteral nutrition. Surgery. 1999;126:28–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mercer DF, Hobson BD, Fischer RT, Talmon GA, Perry DA, Gerhardt BK, Grant WJ, Botha JF, Langnas AN, Quiros-Tejeira RE. Hepatic fibrosis persists and progresses despite biochemical improvement in children treated with intravenous fish oil emulsion. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56:364–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yeh SL, Chen WJ, Huang PC. Effects of L-glutamine on induced hepatosteatosis in rats receiving total parenteral nutrition. J Formos Med Assoc. 1995;94:593–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Javid PJ, Greene AK, Garza J, Gura K, Alwayn IPJ, Voss S, Nose V, Satchi-Fainaro R, Zausche B, Mulkern RV, et al. The route of lipid administration affects parenteral nutrition-induced hepatic steatosis in a mouse model. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1446–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu Z, Harvey KA, Pavlina T, Dutot G, Hise M, Zaloga GP, Siddiqui RA. Steroidal compounds in commercial parenteral lipid emulsions. Nutrients. 2012;4:904–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ostlund RE. Phytosterols in human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:533–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clayton PT, Whitfield P, Iyer K. The role of phytosterols in the pathogenesis of liver complications of pediatric parenteral nutrition. Nutrition. 1998;14:158–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salen G, Ahrens EH, Grundy SM. Metabolism of beta-sitosterol in man. J Clin Invest. 1970;49:952–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Clayton PT, Bowron A, Mills KA, Massoud A, Casteels M, Milla PJ. Phytosterolemia in children with parenteral nutrition-associated cholestatic liver disease. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:1806–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ellegård L, Sunesson A, Bosaeus I. High serum phytosterol levels in short bowel patients on parenteral nutrition support. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:415–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Llop JM, Virgili N, Moreno-Villares JM, García-Peris P, Serrano T, Forga M, Solanich J, Pita AM. Phytosterolemia in parenteral nutrition patients: implications for liver disease development. Nutrition. 2008;24:1145–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Savini S, D’Ascenzo R, Biagetti C, Serpentini G, Pompilio A, Bartoli A, Cogo PE, Carnielli VP. The effect of 5 intravenous lipid emulsions on plasma phytosterols in preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:312–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van Aerde JE, Duerksen DR, Gramlich L, Meddings JB, Chan G, Thomson AB, Clandinin MT. Intravenous fish oil emulsion attenuates total parenteral nutrition-induced cholestasis in newborn piglets. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:202–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Iyer KR, Spitz L, Clayton P. BAPS prize lecture: new insight into mechanisms of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis: role of plant sterols. British Association of Paediatric Surgeons. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carter BA, Taylor OA, Prendergast DR, Zimmerman TL, Von Furstenberg R, Moore DD, Karpen SJ. Stigmasterol, a soy lipid-derived phytosterol, is an antagonist of the bile acid nuclear receptor FXR. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:301–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shefer S, Salen G, Nguyen L, Batta AK, Packin V, Tint GS, Hauser S. Competitive inhibition of bile acid synthesis by endogenous cholestanol and sitosterol in sitosterolemia with xanthomatosis. Effect on cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:1833–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boberg KM, Akerlund JE, Björkhem I. Effect of sitosterol on the rate-limiting enzymes in cholesterol synthesis and degradation. Lipids. 1989;24:9–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu Y, Binz J, Numerick MJ, Dennis S, Luo G, Desai B, MacKenzie KI, Mansfield TA, Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, et al. Hepatoprotection by the farnesoid X receptor agonist GW4064 in rat models of intra- and extrahepatic cholestasis. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1678–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Calder PC. Immunomodulation by omega-3 fatty acids. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2007;77:327–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dichtl W, Ares MPS, Jönson AN, Jovinge S, Pachinger O, Giachelli CM, Hamsten A, Eriksson P, Nilsson J. Linoleic acid-stimulated vascular adhesion molecule-1 expression in endothelial cells depends on nuclear factor-kappaB activation. Metabolism. 2002;51:327–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park HJ, Lee YW, Hennig B, Toborek M. Linoleic acid-induced VCAM-1 expression in human microvascular endothelial cells is mediated by the NF-kappa B-dependent pathway. Nutr Cancer. 2001;41:126–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sijben JWC, Calder PC. Differential immunomodulation with long-chain n-3 PUFA in health and chronic disease. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007;66:237–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Node K, Huo Y, Ruan X, Yang B, Spiecker M, Ley K, Zeldin DC, Liao JK. Anti-inflammatory properties of cytochrome P450 epoxygenase-derived eicosanoids. Science. 1999;285:1276–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Spector AA, Fang X, Snyder GD, Weintraub NL. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs): metabolism and biochemical function. Prog Lipid Res. 2004;43:55–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bagga D, Wang L, Farias-Eisner R, Glaspy JA, Reddy ST. Differential effects of prostaglandin derived from omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on COX-2 expression and IL-6 secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1751–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wall R, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. Fatty acids from fish: the anti-inflammatory potential of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Nutr Rev. 2010;68:280–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oh DY, Talukdar S, Bae EJ, Imamura T, Morinaga H, Fan W, Li P, Lu WJ, Watkins SM, Olefsky JM. GPR120 is an omega-3 fatty acid receptor mediating potent anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing effects. Cell. 2010;142:687–98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yeh SL, Chang KY, Huang PC, Chen WJ. Effects of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids on plasma eicosanoids and liver antioxidant enzymes in rats receiving total parenteral nutrition. Nutrition. 1997;13:32–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee S, Kim S, Le HD, Meisel J, Strijbosch RAM, Nose V, Puder M. Reduction of hepatocellular injury after common bile duct ligation using omega-3 fatty acids. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:2010–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen WY, Lin SY, Pan HC, Liao SL, Chuang YH, Yen YJ, Lin SY, Chen CJ. Beneficial effect of docosahexaenoic acid on cholestatic liver injury in rats. J Nutr Biochem. 2012;23:252–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wanten G, Beunk J, Naber A, Swinkels D. Tocopherol isoforms in parenteral lipid emulsions and neutrophil activation. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:417–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ames BN, Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM. Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7915–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kohen R, Nyska A. Oxidation of biological systems: oxidative stress phenomena, antioxidants, redox reactions, and methods for their quantification. Toxicol Pathol. 2002;30:620–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Day CP, James OF. Steatohepatitis: a tale of two ‘hits’? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:842–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kalish BT, Le HD, Gura KM, Bistrian BR, Puder M. A metabolomic analysis of two intravenous lipid emulsions in a murine model. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hong L, Wang X, Wu J, Cai W. Mitochondria-initiated apoptosis triggered by oxidative injury play a role in total parenteral nutrition-associated liver dysfunction in infant rabbit model. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1712–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition Pediatric nutrition handbook. 6th ed. Elk Grove Village (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics; 2009. p. 523. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cavicchi M, Beau P, Crenn P, Degott C, Messing B. Prevalence of liver disease and contributing factors in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition for permanent intestinal failure. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:525–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Colomb V, Jobert-Giraud A, Lacaille F, Goulet O, Fournet JC, Ricour C. Role of lipid emulsions in cholestasis associated with long-term parenteral nutrition in children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2000;24:345–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Allardyce DB. Cholestasis caused by lipid emulsions. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;154:641–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cober MP, Killu G, Brattain A, Welch KB, Kunisaki SM, Teitelbaum DH. Intravenous fat emulsions reduction for patients with parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. J Pediatr. 2012;160:421–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dobbing J, Sands J. Quantitative growth and development of human brain. Arch Dis Child. 1973;48:757–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Singh M. Essential fatty acids, DHA and human brain. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:239–42 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rollins MD, Ward RM, Jackson WD, Mulroy CW, Spencer CP, Ying J, Greene T, Book LS. Effect of decreased parenteral soybean lipid emulsion on hepatic function in infants at risk for parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease: a pilot study. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:1348–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nehra D, Fallon EM, Carlson SJ, Potemkin AK, Hevelone ND, Mitchell PD, Gura KM, Puder M. Provision of a soy-based intravenous lipid emulsion at 1 g/kg/d does not prevent cholestasis in neonates. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:498–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Innis SM. Essential fatty acid transfer and fetal development. Placenta. 2005;26 Suppl A:S70#x20135. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 55. Schulzke SM, Patole SK, Simmer K. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD000375. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 56.Koletzko B, Goulet O, Hunt J, Krohn K, Shamir R. 1. Guidelines on Paediatric Parenteral Nutrition of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), Supported by the European Society of Paedia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41 Suppl 2:S1–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gura KM, Duggan CP, Collier SB, Jennings RW, Folkman J, Bistrian BR, Puder M. Reversal of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in two infants with short bowel syndrome using parenteral fish oil: implications for future management. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e197–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Puder M, Valim C, Meisel JA, Le HD, de Meijer VE, Robinson EM, Zhou J, Duggan C, Gura KM. Parenteral fish oil improves outcomes in patients with parenteral nutrition-associated liver injury. Ann Surg. 2009;250:395–402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chung PHY, Wong KKY, Wong RMS, Tsoi NS, Chan KL, Tam PKH. Clinical experience in managing pediatric patients with ultra-short bowel syndrome using omega-3 fatty acid. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2010;20:139–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cheung HM, Lam HS, Tam YH, Lee KH, Ng PC. Rescue treatment of infants with intestinal failure and parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) using a parenteral fish-oil-based lipid. Clin Nutr. 2009;28:209–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sant’Anna AMGA, Altamimi E, Clause R-F, Saab J, Mileski H, Cameron B, Fitzgerald P, Sant’Anna GM. Implementation of a multidisciplinary team approach and fish oil emulsion administration in the management of infants with short bowel syndrome and parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26: 277–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Premkumar MH, Carter BA, Hawthorne KM, King K, brams SA. High rates of resolution of cholestasis in parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease with fish oil-based lipid emulsion monotherapy. J Pediatr. 2012;162:793–8.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Clarke SD, Jump DB. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of gene transcription. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14:83–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Serhan CN, Hong S, Gronert K, Colgan SP, Devchand PR, Mirick G, Moussignac R-L. Resolvins: a family of bioactive products of omega-3 fatty acid transformation circuits initiated by aspirin treatment that counter proinflammation signals. J Exp Med. 2002;196:1025–37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.González-Périz A, Horrillo R, Ferré N, Gronert K, Dong B, Morán-Salvador E, Titos E, Martínez-Clemente M, López-Parra M, Arroyo V, Clària J. Obesity-induced insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis are alleviated by omega-3 fatty acids: a role for resolvins and protectins. FASEB J. 2009;23:1946–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Muhammed R, Bremner R, Protheroe S, Johnson T, Holden C, Murphy MS. Resolution of parenteral nutrition-associated jaundice on changing from a soybean oil emulsion to a complex mixed-lipid emulsion. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:797–802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Angsten G, Finkel Y, Lucas S, Kassa AM, Paulsson M, Lilja HE. Improved outcome in neonatal short bowel syndrome using parenteral fish oil in combination with ω-6/9 lipid emulsions. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36:587–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Advances in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES