Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):10820–10825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10820

Activation domain-mediated enhancement of activator binding to chromatin in mammalian cells.

C A Bunker 1, R E Kingston 1
PMCID: PMC38239  PMID: 8855264

Abstract

DNA binding by transcriptional activators is typically an obligatory step in the activation of gene expression. Activator binding and subsequent steps in transcription are repressed by genomic chromatin. Studies in vitro have suggested that overcoming this repression is an important function of some activation domains. Here we provide quantitative in vivo evidence that the activation domain of GAL4-VP16 can increase the affinity of GAL4 for its binding site on genomic DNA in mammalian cells. Moreover, the VP16 activation domain has a much greater stimulatory effect on expression from a genomic reporter gene than on a transiently transfected reporter gene, where factor binding is more permissive. We found that not all activation domains showed a greater activation potential in a genomic context, suggesting that only some activation domains can function in vivo to alleviate the repressive effects of chromatin. These data demonstrate the importance of activation domains in relieving chromatin-mediated repression in vivo and suggest that one way they function is to increase binding of the activator itself.

Full text

PDF
10820

Images in this article

10822Fig. 1
on p.10822
10823Fig. 2
on p.10823

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):2033–2047. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer T. K., Cordingley M. G., Wolford R. G., Hager G. L. Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):688–698. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Archer T. K., Lefebvre P., Wolford R. G., Hager G. L. Transcription factor loading on the MMTV promoter: a bimodal mechanism for promoter activation. Science. 1992 Mar 20;255(5051):1573–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.1347958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelrod J. D., Reagan M. S., Majors J. GAL4 disrupts a repressing nucleosome during activation of GAL1 transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):857–869. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baichwal V. R., Park A., Tjian R. The cell-type-specific activator region of c-Jun juxtaposes constitutive and negatively regulated domains. Genes Dev. 1992 Aug;6(8):1493–1502. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.8.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barberis A., Pearlberg J., Simkovich N., Farrell S., Reinagel P., Bamdad C., Sigal G., Ptashne M. Contact with a component of the polymerase II holoenzyme suffices for gene activation. Cell. 1995 May 5;81(3):359–368. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bunker C. A., Kingston R. E. Transcriptional repression by Drosophila and mammalian Polycomb group proteins in transfected mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1721–1732. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carey M., Kakidani H., Leatherwood J., Mostashari F., Ptashne M. An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer. J Mol Biol. 1989 Oct 5;209(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen H., Li B., Workman J. L. A histone-binding protein, nucleoplasmin, stimulates transcription factor binding to nucleosomes and factor-induced nucleosome disassembly. EMBO J. 1994 Jan 15;13(2):380–390. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06272.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cordingley M. G., Riegel A. T., Hager G. L. Steroid-dependent interaction of transcription factors with the inducible promoter of mouse mammary tumor virus in vivo. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):261–270. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90429-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Côté J., Quinn J., Workman J. L., Peterson C. L. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science. 1994 Jul 1;265(5168):53–60. doi: 10.1126/science.8016655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garrity P. A., Wold B. J. Effects of different DNA polymerases in ligation-mediated PCR: enhanced genomic sequencing and in vivo footprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):1021–1025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.3.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giniger E., Ptashne M. Transcription in yeast activated by a putative amphipathic alpha helix linked to a DNA binding unit. Nature. 1987 Dec 17;330(6149):670–672. doi: 10.1038/330670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gossen M., Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5547–5551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Green M., Schuetz T. J., Sullivan E. K., Kingston R. E. A heat shock-responsive domain of human HSF1 that regulates transcription activation domain function. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;15(6):3354–3362. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Imbalzano A. N., Kwon H., Green M. R., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):481–485. doi: 10.1038/370481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamakaka R. T., Bulger M., Kadonaga J. T. Potentiation of RNA polymerase II transcription by Gal4-VP16 during but not after DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 1993 Sep;7(9):1779–1795. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim Y. J., Björklund S., Li Y., Sayre M. H., Kornberg R. D. A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):599–608. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kingston R. E., Green M. R. Modeling eukaryotic transcriptional activation. Curr Biol. 1994 Apr 1;4(4):325–332. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00071-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koleske A. J., Young R. A. An RNA polymerase II holoenzyme responsive to activators. Nature. 1994 Mar 31;368(6470):466–469. doi: 10.1038/368466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kwon H., Imbalzano A. N., Khavari P. A., Kingston R. E., Green M. R. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):477–481. doi: 10.1038/370477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Laybourn P. J., Kadonaga J. T. Role of nucleosomal cores and histone H1 in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science. 1991 Oct 11;254(5029):238–245. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5029.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li B., Adams C. C., Workman J. L. Nucleosome binding by the constitutive transcription factor Sp1. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 11;269(10):7756–7763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li Q., Wrange O. Translational positioning of a nucleosomal glucocorticoid response element modulates glucocorticoid receptor affinity. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12A):2471–2482. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12a.2471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lieberman P. M., Berk A. J. The Zta trans-activator protein stabilizes TFIID association with promoter DNA by direct protein-protein interaction. Genes Dev. 1991 Dec;5(12B):2441–2454. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lorch Y., LaPointe J. W., Kornberg R. D. Initiation on chromatin templates in a yeast RNA polymerase II transcription system. Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12A):2282–2287. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.12a.2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mymryk J. S., Berard D., Hager G. L., Archer T. K. Mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin in human breast cancer cells is constitutively hypersensitive and exhibits steroid hormone-independent loading of transcription factors in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;15(1):26–34. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perlmann T., Wrange O. Specific glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA reconstituted in a nucleosome. EMBO J. 1988 Oct;7(10):3073–3079. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03172.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Piña B., Brüggemeier U., Beato M. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):719–731. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90087-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sadowski I., Ma J., Triezenberg S., Ptashne M. GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature. 1988 Oct 6;335(6190):563–564. doi: 10.1038/335563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shockett P., Difilippantonio M., Hellman N., Schatz D. G. A modified tetracycline-regulated system provides autoregulatory, inducible gene expression in cultured cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6522–6526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Svaren J., Schmitz J., Hörz W. The transactivation domain of Pho4 is required for nucleosome disruption at the PHO5 promoter. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4856–4862. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06812.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tanaka M. Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):4311–4315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor I. C., Workman J. L., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1285–1298. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tjian R., Maniatis T. Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vashee S., Kodadek T. The activation domain of GAL4 protein mediates cooperative promoter binding with general transcription factors in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Nov 7;92(23):10683–10687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vettese-Dadey M., Walter P., Chen H., Juan L. J., Workman J. L. Role of the histone amino termini in facilitated binding of a transcription factor, GAL4-AH, to nucleosome cores. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):970–981. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Walter P. P., Owen-Hughes T. A., Côté J., Workman J. L. Stimulation of transcription factor binding and histone displacement by nucleosome assembly protein 1 and nucleoplasmin requires disruption of the histone octamer. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6178–6187. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wechsler D. S., Papoulas O., Dang C. V., Kingston R. E. Differential binding of c-Myc and Max to nucleosomal DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4097–4107. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilson C. J., Chao D. M., Imbalzano A. N., Schnitzler G. R., Kingston R. E., Young R. A. RNA polymerase II holoenzyme contains SWI/SNF regulators involved in chromatin remodeling. Cell. 1996 Jan 26;84(2):235–244. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80978-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Workman J. L., Kingston R. E. Nucleosome core displacement in vitro via a metastable transcription factor-nucleosome complex. Science. 1992 Dec 11;258(5089):1780–1784. doi: 10.1126/science.1465613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E., Roeder R. G. Control of class II gene transcription during in vitro nucleosome assembly. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;35:419–447. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60582-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang L., Gralla J. D. In situ nucleoprotein structure at the SV40 major late promoter: melted and wrapped DNA flank the start site. Genes Dev. 1989 Nov;3(11):1814–1822. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.11.1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES