Abstract
We studied the photocurrents of a cyanobacterial rhodopsin Gloeobacter violaceus (GR) in Xenopus laevis oocytes and HEK-293 cells. This protein is a light-driven proton pump with striking similarities to marine proteorhodopsins, including the D121-H87 cluster of the retinal Schiff base counterion and a glutamate at position 132 that acts as a proton donor for chromophore reprotonation during the photocycle. Interestingly, at low extracellular pHo and negative voltage, the proton flux inverted and directed inward. Using electrophysiological measurements of wild-type and mutant GR, we demonstrate that the electrochemical gradient limits outward-directed proton pumping and converts it into a purely passive proton influx. This conclusion contradicts the contemporary paradigm that at low pH, proteorhodopsins actively transport H+ into cells. We identified E132 and S77 as key residues that allow inward directed diffusion. Substitution of E132 with aspartate or S77 with either alanine or cysteine abolished the inward-directed current almost completely. The proton influx is likely caused by the pKa of E132 in GR, which is lower than that of other microbial ion pumping rhodopsins. The advantage of such a low pKa is an acceleration of the photocycle and high pump turnover at high light intensities.
Introduction
Besides chlorophyll-dependent photosynthesis, nature uses retinal-dependent light-driven ion pumps to energize cells by direct sunlight. These pumps were originally discovered in Archaea of high salt epitopes, but were later also found in moderately halophilic Eubacteria, Proteobacteria (1), and some Eucarya (2,3). Most light-driven pumps transport protons from the cytoplasm to the extracellular space to generate an electrochemical gradient that drives secondary events such as ATP biosynthesis. The most prominent member of this family, bacteriorhodopsin (BR) of Halobacterium salinarum, has been thoroughly studied, mostly by spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography, over the past four decades. Unidirectional proton transport in BR is driven by conformational changes of the protein and by H+-transfer reactions between selected residues within the intracellular and extracellular H+-conducting trails. The conformational changes are accompanied by absorption changes during the photocycle and lead to the definition of defined photocycle intermediates (4,5). Electric processes and bioenergetic considerations of BR were revealed primarily by studies in proteoliposomes, and on purple membranes attached to black-lipid membranes (6–9). Later, BR was studied electrically in Xenopus laevis oocytes and human embryo kidney (HEK)-293 cells (10,11).
The results obtained were consistent with earlier measurements of intact cells (12) in the sense that BR from H. salinarum could transport protons against a maximal load of ∼−285 mV. The molecular details, however, that limit H+ pumping at opposing proton motive forces remained unknown or poorly understood. Spectroscopic studies on BR suggested that the photocycle changes substantially at low pH because Schiff base deprotonation is invisible at acidic conditions (13). In electrophysiological experiments on BR and Acetetabularia rhodopsin (AR), the pump current approached zero at a very negative voltage without leaking or inverting its direction at any experimental condition (3,10,11). In contrast, Béjà et al. (1) reported that the so-called Green Proteorhodopsin (GPR) isolated from the marine γ-proteobacterium EBAC31A08 switches the pump direction from outward to inward at low extracellular pH. The authors further concluded that the high pKa (∼7.5) of D97 serving as the negative counterion of the protonated retinal Schiff base (RSBH), corresponding to D85 with pKa of only ∼2.5 in BR, is the most critical feature for this bifunctional behavior (14,15). The authors argue that external acidic conditions protonate PR-D97, resulting in release of the Schiff base proton to the intracellular side upon M-state formation during the photocycle. However, the notion of GPR-mediated inward pumping has been challenged by experiments with vesicles composed of GPR-expressing Escherichia coli cells and proteoliposomes reconstituted with purified PR, in which inward-directed ion pumping was not observed at acidic pH conditions (16,17).
Moreover, studies of purified GPR in detergent demonstrated that, during the photocycle under acid conditions, species with a deprotonated Schiff base did not accumulate. More importantly, no charge movement was observed in electrical measurements of preoriented GPR in acrylamide gels (18,19).
Here we present results from an electrophysiological study of the proton-pumping rhodopsin from cyanobacteria Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421 (20) expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and HEK-293 cells. Two-electrode voltage-clamp assays in oocytes and whole-cell measurements in HEK-293 cells demonstrate that, although proton pumping was directed outward under most conditions, it became inward under extracellular acidic conditions and the presence of a negative membrane voltage. This influx was visible when the inward-directed proton motive force exceeded −260 mV, suggesting that the proton influx was purely passive. We also demonstrate that the key residue for the observed passive proton influx is E132, which functions as the proton donor for the retinal Schiff base (RSB), and the adjacent position S77 (21). Substitution of these residues blocked leakage at the expense of a reduced photocycle speed.
We present a model that explains the bidirectional ion transport modes for Gloeobacter rhodopsin (GR). Moreover, due to the highly conserved D121-H87 cluster and E132, we propose a similar model for marine proteorhodopsins. Common features but also differences among GPR, BR, and GR will be discussed at a molecular level. The large photocurrents of GR in oocytes opened up the opportunity to study the voltage-dependent proton transport in microbial rhodopsins with (to our knowledge) so-far unrivaled precision.
Materials and Methods
Cloning and site-directed mutagenesis
A full-length GR-coding DNA sequence (accession no. Q7NP59) was cloned via BamHI/HindIII into the pGEMHE vector, which consists of a T7 promoter and polyadenylation site. For expression into HEK-293 cells, the GR coding DNA was cloned into the pECFP-N1 vector using HindIII/SacII. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Preparation of mRNA
Capped mRNA was synthesized in vitro from NheI-linearized pGEMHE plasmid (mMessage mMachine T7kit; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol except for the following 15 μL reaction: 0.5 μg/μL mRNA, 5 μL 2×NTP/CAP, 1.5 μL 10× Reaction Buffer, 1 μL Enzyme Mix, and 7 μL H2O.
Expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes
Oocytes were prepared from female Xenopus laevis as described previously in Tsunoda et al. (3). Single oocytes were injected with 28 ± 2 ng mRNA and incubated in Ringer solution supplemented with 5 μM all-trans-retinal (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Photocurrents were measured 4–5 days after RNA injection.
Two-electrode voltage-clamp measurements
Two-electrode voltage-clamp data was acquired using pClamp10.1 (Molecular Devices, Eugene, OR) and a Turbo Tec-03X amplifier (NPI Electronic, Tamm, Germany). Microelectrodes were fabricated from borosilicate glass capillaries (1.50 mm O.D. and 1.17 mm I.D.) using a micropipette puller (model No. P-97; Sutter instruments, Novato, CA) filled with 3 M KCl. The resistances of microelectrodes were 0.5–1.5 MΩ. An XBO 75 W xenon lamp (Osram, Munich, Germany) served as a light source for current voltage (I(E)) measurements, and was controlled by an LS3 shutter (Vincent Associates UNIBLITZ, Rochester, NY). Different broadband filters, namely K50 and K55 (500 nm and 550 ± 25 nm; Optics Balzers, Balzers, Switzerland), were used to limit wavelengths. Action spectra were measured with a Polychrome II (Till Photonics, Munich, Germany) and were linearly normalized to the corresponding photon flux at each wavelength. The composition of extracellular buffer solutions was as follows: 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MOPS (pHo 6.0 and pHo 7.5, adjusted with 1 M NMG), 5 mM Glycine (pHo 9.0 and pHo 10.0, adjusted with 1 M NMG), and 5 mM citric acid/Na-citrate (pHo 3.8 and 5.0, adjusted with citric acid/Na-citrate).
Transfection and recording of HEK-293 cells
The cells were cultured and transfected as described in Prigge et al. (22). Photocurrents were determined using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Data was recorded with pClamp10.1 (Molecular Devices). A Polychrome V (TILL Photonics) was used as a light source that was controlled with TILLVISION software (TILL Photonics) and by a VS25 shutter (Vincent Associates UNIBLITZ). In contrast to oocyte action spectra measurements, light intensity was directly adjusted to an equal number of photons (1.35 × 1020 m−2/s−1) for all wavelengths using a software-controlled, motorized filter wheel (type NSND-3; Newport, San Diego, CA). The standard external solution contained: 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, and 1 mM KCl with 10 HEPES (pHo 7.2). The standard internal solution contained: 110 mM NaCl, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM CsCl, and 10 mM HEPES (pHi 7.2).
Confocal microscopy
GR localization in HEK-293 cells was monitored 1 day after transfection by detecting enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) fluorescence using a FluoView 1000 microscopy system (Olympus). Pictures were taken on a confocal LSM IX81 equipped with a 60× 1.2 Water UplanSApo objective (Olympus), and 440-nm LEDs were used to excite ECFP. Fluorescence emission was detected using a spectral photomultiplier-tube detector.
Results
Characteristics of Gloeobacter rhodopsin wild-type
cRNA encoding the rhodopsin of Gloeobacter violaceus was injected into freshly prepared Xenopus laevis oocytes. After 4–5 days, photocurrents were measured upon 200-ms illumination at holding voltages between −125 mV and 50 mV (Fig. 1 A). The initial photocurrents decayed from an early maximum to a sustained stationary current under nearly all conditions; however, the peak current was more pronounced at alkaline pHo. Positive currents revealed outward proton pumping. At day 5 after injection, stationary currents with amplitudes up to the 500 nA were recorded at the reference conditions (i.e., 0 mV, pHo 7.5) and were dramatically larger than photocurrents recorded from BR and GPR with ∼50–100 nA ((10,14) and see Fig. S1 C in the Supporting Material). Currents from GR showed significant voltage dependence between pHo 9 and 3.8, and were solely directed outward under all voltage conditions between pHo 6 and 10. At pH 10, the stationary currents were nearly voltage-independent. Interestingly, at pHo 5.0 and 3.8 the negative voltage stationary currents were inverted and directed inward. As the reversal voltage was approached, the outward-directed peak currents transited into stationary inward currents, as seen at −100 mV and pHo 5.0 (Fig. 1 A). This observation can be interpreted as an overlay of two transport modes, one directed outward and the other inward. As expected, the ratio of both depended on the electrochemical gradient.
The reversal voltages for pH values 6.0, 7.5, and 9.0 were determined by extrapolation (Fig. 1 B) and plotted together with the directly measured values for pHo 3.8 and 5.0 versus the membrane voltage (Fig. 1 C). All values were shifted by −260 mV relative to the Nernst potential, which was calculated with an assumed internal pH of 7.4 (23). The data suggest that the current became inverted whenever the load exceeded a maximum of −260 mV. The identical shifts of −260 mV for different pHo values demonstrate the equivalence of the chemical and electrical gradient respective electrochemical loads. Finally, all current amplitudes were independent of monovalent cations and anions in the medium, excluding any contributions of these ions to the pump current or inhibitory function, respectively (see Fig. S1). We observed a small reduction in current upon addition of 100 mM Mg2+ or Ca2+, which was most likely due to a surface charge effect.
Next, we studied the wavelength dependence of the currents under variable conditions. The action spectra showed maxima near 540 nm with minor variations up to 4 nm for spectra recorded from pHo 9 to 3.8. Most interestingly, even the inward currents observed at pH 3.8 did not exhibit a spectral shift compared to pH 7.5 (Fig. 1 D). Because protonation of the RSB counterion is expected to cause spectral shifts in practically all rhodopsins (24,25), we exclude a protonation change of the counterion complex as the mechanism behind the current inversion.
Modification of the RSB counterion complex
Because the protonation state of D121 remained unchanged after the switch from outward to inward currents, it could be hypothesized that the H+-transfer function of the D121 carboxylic residue is dispensable. To test this, we substituted D121 with threonine. The mutant, GR-D121T, was nonfunctional and exhibited only small transient photocurrents (Fig. 2 A ). These inward-directed transient currents were consistent with a proton release from the RSBH+ toward the inner surface of the membrane. Moreover, this release was only visible at negative voltages (Fig. 2 B), thereby revealing that substantial H+ movement—not pumping—occurred along the electrochemical gradient. Thus, in the absence of a negative counterion, the RSBH+ proton was released to the internal side of the protein during the photocycle. The extent of the charge displacement depended on the membrane voltage. However, for both active outward pumping and sustained passive inward currents, the H+ transfer function of D121 was required.
GPR shows a strong pH dependence on the absorption spectrum in detergent caused by the high pKa of D97, which functions as the primary acceptor of the RSB proton (26). The high pKa = 7.1 is a result of the hydrogen-bridged contact of D97 to the nearby H75. Because this histidine is conserved within the PR evolutionary clade, a high pKa for the Schiff base counterion is considered a general property of all PRs and related pumps (27–29). However, a previous study reported that the Exiguobacterium sibiricum (ESR) proton pump, which also contains the corresponding histidine, exhibits a low counterion pKa and marginal spectral pH dependence between pH 3 and 9 (30). Mutation of this histidine (H57) to methionine shifted the pKa of the counterion to higher values (as observed for Green PR) and caused protonation of the counterion at relatively moderate acidic conditions (pHo) (30). Consistent with the pH-insensitivity of the GR spectrum, the influence of the homologous H87 on the Schiff counterion pKa in GR may be similar to ESR yet substantially different from Green PR.
To assess the role of H87 on the RSB counterion in GR, we replaced H87 with alanine or methionine. Both GR-H87A and GR-H87M were still active pumps and showed inward-directed currents at low pH. With respect to current traces and I(E)-relations, GR-H87M was quite similar to Gloeobacter rhodopsin wild-type (GR-WT), even though the current amplitudes were smaller and the peak currents were less developed (Fig. 2, C and D). The kinetics were slightly faster, as observed previously for the analogous mutation in GPR (see Fig. S5 C) (28). The spectral maximum of GR-H87M was blue-shifted by 10 nm at neutral pH (λmax at 533nm) relative to GR-WT. However, the H87M spectrum of the inward currents recorded at high load with −120 mV and pHo 3.8 was shifted bathochromic by 16 nm compared to 0 mV, suggesting that in this case the D121 counterion was protonated at low pHo during the dark state (Fig. 2 E), similar to the homologous ESR mutant. This experiment supports the notion that the protonation state of the counterion complex is irrelevant for the observed inward currents. GR-H87A did not show any spectral shift at low pHo due to lack of interaction between alanine and D121 (see Fig. S2).
Because it was conceivable that our inability to protonate D121 in oocytes may be caused by only unilateral acidification, we transiently expressed GR-WT and GR-H87M in HEK-293 cells and measured the whole-cell photocurrent. Although only a small fraction was integrated into the membrane as shown for WT, in Fig. 3 A the expression was sufficient for representative measurements (Fig. 3 B). Photocurrents were similar to oocyte experiments with low voltage dependence for both peak and stationary currents at neutral pH (see Fig. S4 B). HEK cell experiments provided the complementary information that low internal pHi keeps the WT spectrum almost unchanged (Fig. 3, C and G) and current inversion was prevented, as expected.
For H87M, membrane targeting was again poor (Fig. 3 D) and the transient currents were again completely missing (Fig. 3 E). The spectrum of H87M is blue-shifted by 14 nm relative to wild-type and shifted back almost to the wild-type peak after internal acidification (Fig. 3, F and G). The acid-shift was likely due to small extracellular pH changes because the shift was less pronounced compared to external acidification. These experiments reveal that internal pH has a minor influence on the resulting spectrum and—as expected—reduced the electrochemical load.
Mutation of E132 and S77
Another characteristic of all proteorhodopsins and related pumps is that a glutamate residue reprotonates the RSB during the photocycle. In contrast, an aspartate residue carries out this role in most archaeal pumps, such as D96 in BR (31–33). Substitution of E132 with aspartate in GR kept the photocurrents at neutral pH nearly unchanged (Fig. 4 A). Interestingly, the voltage dependence of the currents was stronger compared to WT (see traces at pH 7.5). At negative voltage and acidic conditions, the current amplitudes were reduced drastically but sign inversion did only barely occur (Fig. 4, A and C). The lack of inward currents in the mutant may be due to aggravated deprotonation because of a lower pKa, which may be caused by stabilized bridging of the protonated aspartate to adjacent H+-acceptors (34).
To better understand this phenomenon, we examined the three-dimensional structure of Xanthorhodopsin (XR), which is related to GR (29). In XR, the homologous E107 is H+-bridged to water (Wat-502) and only indirectly associated with S52 (analogous to S77 in GR). In BR, however, the homologous D96 is directly bridged to T46. This hydrogen bridge becomes dissociated during the photocycle upon formation of the N-state when the H+ is transferred to the RSB (35). To test the relevance of the E132-S77 connection in GR, we replaced S77 with alanine or cysteine. Both mutants, GR-S77A and GR-S77C, were active and exhibited similar characteristics to GR-E132D, with only evanescent currents observed at low pH (Fig. 4, B and D, and see Fig. S3). Based on these data, we conclude that mutation of either E132 or S77 modifies hydrogen bridging between these residues with a concomitant decline in the pKa of the E132 H+-donor.
Kinetic properties of GR-WT and E132D
Because previous studies demonstrated that inward-directed currents are prevented in BR and AR and both pumps possess an aspartate at the position homologous to GR-E132, the Glu/Asp substitution may be considered an advantage. Interestingly, our data demonstrate that the kinetics of GR-E132D was slower compared to GR-WT (Fig. 5, A–D). Consequently, the photocurrent of the mutant became saturated at lower light intensities. Outward-directed currents of GR-WT were characterized by fast, quite voltage-independent τoff values of ∼5–7 ms at pHo 5 to 10 with only slight increase under acidic conditions (Fig. 5 A and see Fig. S5). In contrast, τoff of GR-E132D was both more voltage- and pHo-dependent (Fig. 5, C and D, and see Fig. S5), ranging from 50 ms at pH 5 (−25 mV) to 5 ms at pH 7.5 (50 mV).
Accumulation of late photocycle intermediates at high light intensities results in decreased current amplitudes and the appearance of the transient fraction of the current. The decay of late photocycle intermediates in darkness correlates with recovery of the transient fraction, as seen from experiments with double light pulses of different delay (Fig. 5 E). This recovery was also slower in E132D (τrec = 76 ms) compared to WT (τrec = 50 ms) (Fig. 5 F). Most clearly, a comparison of the WT and mutant amplitudes demonstrated that WT is more efficient than both H87M and E132D (Fig. 5 G).
Discussion
Results from the presented experiments show that the Gloeobacter rhodopsin GR is an active proton pump with a maximal pumping load of ∼−260 mV over a broad pH range. Extrapolated reversal voltages from earlier studies suggest that the maximal forces of the BR, GPR, and AR ion pumps are quite similar and are all in this range (3,9,11,14). However, the current generated by BR, AR, and GR-E132D did not invert at low pHo, and instead approaches zero at loads near −260 mV or beyond (Fig. 4 C in this work, and see Fig. 2 C in Geibel et al. (11) and Fig. 2 D in Tsunoda et al. (3)) whereas GPR and GR currents invert at high electrochemical load.
Because the inward currents observed for GPR at high load were all directed along an electrochemical gradient, these currents are of purely passive nature and are promoted by the high pKa of E108. However, in GPR, the pKa could not be upshifted by the E108D mutant and GPR remained leaky (14,15), suggesting that the details surrounding the hydrogen-bonding network are different in the two proteins.
We developed a Xanthorhodopsin-based GR model that explains both active transport against a gradient and passive proton translocation along a gradient and we compared this model with three-dimensional structures of BR. The crystal structure of the BR dark-state (36) is characterized by direct contact between D96 and T46, suggesting hydrogen bridging between these two residues and two decisive water molecules in the inner half-channel (Wat-501, Wat-502). However, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy studies identified a third highly mobile water molecule named Wat-501b. This water has been seen in the structure of the photocycle intermediate M1 (PDB:1P8H) even before the pronounced helix movement occurs upon approaching the late M2 state. These three water molecules are rearranged during the late M to N transition by protein conformation changes to form the necessary Grotthuss proton wire between Asp96 and the Schiff-base nitrogen before the proton is transferred accordingly (37) (Fig. 6 A). In contrast, typical for XR is the proton donor E107, which is connected to the S52 via a water molecule that also connects E107 with the retinal-binding K240, which is in closer proximity compared to BR (Fig. 6 in Luecke et al. (29)). In GR this structural feature is expected to be conserved (Fig. 6 B), and the hydrogen-bridged water among GR-E132, GR-S77, and the backbone of GR-K257 has been experimentally identified by vibrational spectroscopy (38). The presence of this water molecule in the cytoplasmic cavity between RSB and the inner surface renders the GR dark state similar to the known BR-early-N structure (35) (Fig. 6 C). Water rearrangement with concomitant separation of BR-D96 and T46, and decline in D96-pKa, is needed for the proton transfer to the RSB and completion of the cycle (37,40).
Fig. 6 D illustrates the potential H+-transfer in GR based on the model presented in Fig. 6 B. For simplicity, only one water molecule is depicted near the RSBH (in BR Wat-402). However, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy suggests that the three-dimensional counterion complex actually consists of GR-D121, GR-D253, and three water molecules similar to BR (21). As mentioned above, GR-D121 acts as the proton transfer residue for both inward- and outward-directed currents and its pKa is below 3.8, which means it is not protonated up to a bulk pHo of 3.8. Because H87 does not function as a pKa modifier in GR, this residue is not shown in the model. The cytoplasmic side of GR-E132 is protonated similar to BR-D96 in darkness at neutral pH; however, deprotonation occurs during the M to N transition as in case of BR (41). At low pH and negative membrane voltage, the situation in GR changes (Fig. 6 E). We predict that under these conditions GR-E132 is already deprotonated in the dark state and deprotonation is facilitated by hydrogen bonding to water. The hydrogen-bonding network on the intracellular portion of the protein connects GR-E132 to the protonated Schiff base. After retinal isomerization and switching of the H+ to the internal side of the Schiff base, the pKa of the Schiff base dramatically decreases (42) and the H+ is now released to the intracellular bulk phase via E132.
This inward-directed H+ release is prevented in BR for two main reasons: lack of long-range interaction between the RSB and BR-D96 during the early reactions of the photocycle, and the higher pKa of BR-D96. Thus, we propose that replacement of E132 with aspartate in GR increases the pKa of this residue toward that of BR due to loss of hydrogen bonding.
The argument of Friedrich et al. (14) and Lörinczi et al. (15) is quite different and not in line with our model, although their measurements on GPR are similar to the results we presented above for GR and to our understanding fully compatible with our model. The authors argue that at acidic conditions in wild-type GPR the RSB counterion Asp97 (corresponding to GR-D121 and BR-D85) is protonated in the dark, thereby promoting H+ release from the RSB toward the intracellular site of the membrane. This argument results from spectroscopic studies on GPR in detergent where D97 protonates at relatively mild acidic conditions (pKa between 7.1 and 7.7 (14,26)). However, deprotonation has not been substantiated for GPR in oocytes by action spectroscopy. Even more important is the fact that inward-directed currents are observed only when at low pHo an additional membrane voltage is applied (14,15). Moreover, we have demonstrated for GR that for inward-directed passive proton translocation, the protonation state of the chromophore counterion is irrelevant, although only chromophores with deprotonated counterion are able to pump protons actively. Therefore, in the light of our data on GR, it is likely that inward-directed currents mediated by GPR are not determined by protonation of D97 but instead, like in GR, caused by the low pKa of GPR-E108, the residue responsible for RSB reprotonation at small load. In line with this argument is the observation of Lakatos et al. (18) and Váró et al. (19) on purified GPR preoriented in acrylamide gels: charge displacement is blocked at low pH when the counterion D97 is protonated, supporting that active pumping requires a deprotonated counterion, whereas passive inward-directed proton translocation does not.
Biological function of GR and Glu132
In principle, it is clear that GR could support ATP synthesis at physiological conditions in Gloeobacter violaceus due to the lack of functional thylakoids and low levels of chlorophyll-dependent photosynthesis (43). Furthermore, published reports have demonstrated that Gloeobacter violaceus has a low capacity for intracellular pH homeostasis (44). Thus, it would not be surprising if GR is involved in these processes. A different but complementary explanation would be that the function of GR could be to sustain a provisional membrane voltage under conditions where chlorophyll-based photosynthesis is depleted. Recently, Marchetti et al. (45) reported a meta-transcriptomic analysis of iron-limited eukaryotic plankton (mostly diatoms). They identified rhodopsin sequences in the oceanic diatoms Pseudo-nitzschia granii and Fragilariopsis cylindrus and the haptophyte Phaeocystis globosa. The rhodopsin transcripts were upregulated in libraries isolated during low iron supply. This conclusion is supported by Raven (46), which suggested that the high iron requirements in oxygenic photosynthesis and lack of trace metal requests rendered rhodopsins advantageous over oxygenic photosynthesis at low-iron environments.
Comparison of proteorhodopsins from marine algae to those of terrestrial cyanobacteria suggests that these light-driven ion pumps are active whenever chlorophyll-dependent photosynthesis is low. For this supportive role, the pumps have been optimized during evolution with respect to speed and not respective activity over a maximal pH range.
Acknowledgments
We thank Maila Reh for preparing oocytes and Sergei P. Balashov and Janos K. Lanyi (University of California, Irvine) for providing expression plasmids encoding GR-WT and GR-H87M and for thoughtful discussion. We also thank Thomas Korte and Andreas Herrmann (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) for help with fluorescence microscopy.
The work was supported by the Leibniz Graduate School of Molecular Biophysics (to A.V.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFGgrant Nos. HE3824/9-4 and B2-SFB-1078 to P.H.).
Footnotes
Areng Vogt and Jonas Wietek contributed equally to this work.
Supporting Material
References
- 1.Béjà O., Aravind L., DeLong E.F. Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea. Science. 2000;289:1902–1906. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5486.1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Waschuk S.A., Bezerra A.G., Jr., Brown L.S. Leptosphaeria rhodopsin: bacteriorhodopsin-like proton pump from a eukaryote. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:6879–6883. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409659102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tsunoda S.P., Ewers D., Hegemann P. H+-pumping rhodopsin from the marine alga Acetabularia. Biophys. J. 2006;91:1471–1479. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.086421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lanyi J.K. Proton transfers in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1757:1012–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stoeckenius W., Lozier R.H., Niederberger W. Photoreactions of bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 1977;3:65–68. doi: 10.1007/BF00536456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Herrmann T.R., Rayfield G.W. A measurement of the proton pump current generated by bacteriorhodopsin in black lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1976;443:623–628. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90482-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bamberg E. Rhodopsin and other proteins in artificial lipid membranes. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 1977;3:39–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00536452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Braun D., Dencher N.A., Heyn M.P. Nonlinear voltage dependence of the light-driven proton pump current of bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. J. 1988;53:617–621. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83140-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Drachev L.A., Jasaitis A.A., Skulachev V.P. Direct measurement of electric current generation by cytochrome oxidase, H+-ATPase and bacteriorhodopsin. Nature. 1974;249:321–324. doi: 10.1038/249321a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nagel G., Möckel B., Bamberg E. Functional expression of bacteriorhodopsin in oocytes allows direct measurement of voltage dependence of light induced H+ pumping. FEBS Lett. 1995;377:263–266. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01356-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Geibel S., Friedrich T., Bamberg E. The voltage-dependent proton pumping in bacteriorhodopsin is characterized by optoelectric behavior. Biophys. J. 2001;81:2059–2068. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75855-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Michel H., Oesterhelt D. Light-induced changes of the pH gradient and the membrane potential in H. halobium. FEBS Lett. 1976;65:175–178. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80473-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Váró G., Lanyi J.K. Photoreactions of bacteriorhodopsin at acid pH. Biophys. J. 1989;56:1143–1151. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82761-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Friedrich T., Geibel S., Bamberg E. Proteorhodopsin is a light-driven proton pump with variable vectoriality. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;321:821–838. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00696-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lörinczi E., Verhoefen M.K., Friedrich T. Voltage- and pH-dependent changes in vectoriality of photocurrents mediated by wild-type and mutant proteorhodopsins upon expression in Xenopus oocytes. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;393:320–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang W.W., Sineshchekov O.A., Spudich J.L. Spectroscopic and photochemical characterization of a deep ocean proteorhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:33985–33991. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305716200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dioumaev A.K., Wang J.M., Lanyi J.K. Proton transport by proteorhodopsin requires that the retinal Schiff base counterion Asp-97 be anionic. Biochemistry. 2003;42:6582–6587. doi: 10.1021/bi034253r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lakatos M., Lanyi J.K., Váró G. The photochemical reaction cycle of proteorhodopsin at low pH. Biophys. J. 2003;84:3252–3256. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)70049-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Váró G., Brown L.S., Lanyi J.K. Characterization of the photochemical reaction cycle of proteorhodopsin. Biophys. J. 2003;84:1202–1207. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74934-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nakamura Y., Kaneko T., Tabata S. Complete genome structure of Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421, a cyanobacterium that lacks thylakoids. DNA Res. 2003;10:137–145. doi: 10.1093/dnares/10.4.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hashimoto K., Choi A.R., Kandori H. Low-temperature FTIR study of Gloeobacter rhodopsin: presence of strongly hydrogen-bonded water and long-range structural protein perturbation upon retinal photoisomerization. Biochemistry. 2010;49:3343–3350. doi: 10.1021/bi100184k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prigge M., Schneider F., Hegemann P. Color-tuned channelrhodopsins for multiwavelength optogenetics. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:31804–31812. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.391185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cicirelli M.F., Robinson K.R., Smith L.D. Internal pH of Xenopus oocytes: a study of the mechanism and role of pH changes during meiotic maturation. Dev. Biol. 1983;100:133–146. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wanko M., Hoffmann M., Elstner M. Effect of polarization on the opsin shift in rhodopsins. 1. A combined QM/QM/MM model for bacteriorhodopsin and pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:11462–11467. doi: 10.1021/jp802408g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Altun A., Yokoyama S., Morokuma K. Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical studies on spectral tuning mechanisms of visual pigments and other photoactive proteins. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008;84:845–854. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00308.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dioumaev A.K., Brown L.S., Lanyi J.K. Proton transfers in the photochemical reaction cycle of proteorhodopsin. Biochemistry. 2002;41:5348–5358. doi: 10.1021/bi025563x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bergo V.B., Sineshchekov O.A., Spudich J.L. His-75 in proteorhodopsin, a novel component in light-driven proton translocation by primary pumps. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:2836–2843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803792200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hempelmann F., Hölper S., Glaubitz C. His75-Asp97 cluster in green proteorhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:4645–4654. doi: 10.1021/ja111116a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luecke H., Schobert B., Lanyi J.K. Crystallographic structure of xanthorhodopsin, the light-driven proton pump with a dual chromophore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:16561–16565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807162105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Balashov S.P., Petrovskaya L.E., Lanyi J.K. Aspartate-histidine interaction in the retinal Schiff base counterion of the light-driven proton pump of Exiguobacterium sibiricum. Biochemistry. 2012;51:5748–5762. doi: 10.1021/bi300409m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Man D., Wang W., Béjà O. Diversification and spectral tuning in marine proteorhodopsins. EMBO J. 2003;22:1725–1731. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Petrovskaya L.E., Lukashev E.P., Kirpichnikov M.P. Predicted bacteriorhodopsin from Exiguobacterium sibiricum is a functional proton pump. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:4193–4196. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rothschild K.J., Marti T., Khorana H.G. Asp96 deprotonation and transmembrane α-helical structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:27046–27052. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pace C.N., Grimsley G.R., Scholtz J.M. Protein ionizable groups: pK values and their contribution to protein stability and solubility. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:13285–13289. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800080200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schobert B., Brown L.S., Lanyi J.K. Crystallographic structures of the M and N intermediates of bacteriorhodopsin: assembly of a hydrogen-bonded chain of water molecules between Asp-96 and the retinal Schiff base. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;330:553–570. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00576-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schobert B., Cupp-Vickery J., Lanyi J. Crystallographic structure of the K intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin: conservation of free energy after photoisomerization of the retinal. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;321:715–726. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00681-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Freier E., Wolf S., Gerwert K. Proton transfer via a transient linear water-molecule chain in a membrane protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11435–11439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104735108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miranda M.R., Choi A.R., Brown L.S. The photocycle and proton translocation pathway in a cyanobacterial ion-pumping rhodopsin. Biophys. J. 2009;96:1471–1481. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Reference deleted in proof.
- 40.Kamikubo H., Kataoka M., Lanyi J.K. Structure of the N intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin revealed by x-ray diffraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:1386–1390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gerwert K., Hess B., Oesterhelt D. Role of aspartate-96 in proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:4943–4947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.4943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Braiman M.S., Dioumaev A.K., Lewis J.R. A large photolysis-induced pKa increase of the chromophore counterion in bacteriorhodopsin: implications for ion transport mechanisms of retinal proteins. Biophys. J. 1996;70:939–947. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79637-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rippka R., Waterbury J., Cohenbazire G. Cyanobacterium, which lacks thylakoids. Arch. Microbiol. 1974;100:419–436. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Belkin S., Mehlhorn R.J., Packer L. Proton gradients in intact cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. 1987;84:25–30. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Marchetti A., Schruth D.M., Armbrust E.V. Comparative metatranscriptomics identifies molecular bases for the physiological responses of phytoplankton to varying iron availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E317–E325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118408109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Raven J.A. Functional evolution of photochemical energy transformations in oxygen-producing organisms. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009;36:505–515. doi: 10.1071/FP09087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.