Abstract
The current study aims to assess the effectiveness of different teaching methods adopted for the practical session of Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). CPR training is one of the compulsory modules of the Public Health Pharmacy (PHP) course at Universiti Sains Malaysia. CPR training comprises of 10% of total marks of the PHP course. To test the effectiveness of the different teaching strategies, three groups were defined using a two-stage cohort distribution—i.e. based on grade point average (GPA) and different teaching modalities. Group One was instructed using images and PowerPoint lecture slides. Group Two was instructed using videos and PowerPoint lecture slides. Group Three was instructed using PowerPoint slides with white boards and videos. Students in Group Three were not provided with a hard/soft copy of the PowerPoint slides and were encouraged to write down all the information on their personal notebooks. A 20-item questionnaire was used to assess the students’ understanding toward the CPR session. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science Students, SPSS version 13®. Based on the response attained, the comparison of the final score among the groups was undertaken using one way ANOVA. Twenty-seven students have participated in this study. Final evaluation using the questionnaire revealed that student’s in Group Three had a better understanding of CPR (18.1 ± 1.5, p <0.001) than the other two. Students’ note taking during the lecture and use of traditional chalkboard teaching were found significant to improve the students’ understanding and learning in the CPR session.
Keywords: Teaching strategies, Chalkboard, Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
1. Background
Advances in medical and pharmaceutical sciences have vastly changed the concept of clinical practice and teaching methodologies. In the past, medicine and allied health science students gained theoretical knowledge in classroom-based lectures and developed their clinical skills in hospital rotations. It would not be wrong to state that classroom teaching enables the demonstrator to present the factual material in a logical manner to stimulate critical thinking among the students (Bjork, 1991; David and Dianne, 2009). However, certain issues like one-way communication, a passive audience, and difficulty in assessing the learning may act as limitations during classroom-based teaching (David and Dianne, 2009). These limitations have led to the concept of Problem/Case-Based Learning (PBL/CBL). In PBL/CBL, students are led to appreciate clinical/practical aspects of medicine before joining the professional life (McCarthy, 1992). In addition, PBL/CBL helps to develop a long-lasting concept in the student’s mind, which improves decision-making in practical settings. Despite these developments, one cannot neglect the importance of classroom-based learning (CRBL). In addition to traditional teaching measures, computer-assisted multimedia lectures have been added to replace chalkboard methods. The incorporation of this electronic information has further decreased the utility of exclusive use of CRBL. However, electronic teaching materials such as PowerPoint may contribute toward passive learning and students can only retain the information in short-term memory (STM) (Hossein and Abdus, 2005).
Earlier in the 19th century, traditional chalk and board provided an opportunity for the students to note down all the information presented by the teacher using audio and visual approaches (Paivio, 1986). As students listen, understand the concepts, and then take notes, the brain processes the core concepts into memory. However, in current practice, there is a massive use of PowerPoint and slides are made available to the students at the end of the lecture. Thus, many students do not take notes during class. This attitude and environment promote passive learning that limits the student’s ability to store the freshly delivered concepts.
Nowadays, in many pharmacy schools, PBL is practiced as a preferred method of teaching. However, it has not completely replaced the didactic teaching. In addition, PowerPoint slides are generally preferred over the traditional chalk/board method, as these do not require the teacher’s deeper involvement in the class; this practice also appears to be less time-consuming. In terms of certain medical procedures, effective outcomes can be ensured through appropriate teacher’s involvement and teaching strategies. One of the best examples in this regard is Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) teaching, which is essential for medical practitioners around the globe. In Universiti Sains Malaysia, CPR is one of the essential contents of the Public Health Pharmacy course that was introduced during the 2006–2007 academic year. It is a 2-credit hour (1 + 1) course offered during the first semester for first-year students enrolled in the Bachelor of Pharmacy (B. Pharm.) degree program. The course is composed of 24 contact hours (Hassali et al., 2009). CPR training is one of the essential practical elements of the Public health Pharmacy course. It carries about 10% marks, and the students must attend this course to pass this subject. Island College of Technology, Penang Island, Malaysia was one of the franchised units of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Keeping in mind the concept of effective teaching strategies, the current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various teaching methods on the students’ ability to retain information on CPR. This study helps to identify the ideal teaching strategy to increase student learning and understanding toward the concept of CPR.
2. Method
A cohort study was designed using different teaching strategies. The study sample comprised of Bachelor of Pharmacy (B. Pharm.) second-year students enrolled at the Island College of Technology, Penang Island, Malaysia. The assessment of the teaching method was based on CPR sessions conducted for the B. Pharm. students.
2.1. Study design
This was an interventional study involving 27 students. Student evaluation was based on their learning from the CPR sessions. The students had attended a CPR training session in their previous semester conducted by a qualified medical doctor using dummy models. The main aim was to evaluate the level of student’s learning of CPR using different teaching/demonstration approaches.
2.2. Distribution/selection of students for cohorts
A two-stage cohort selection process was adopted:
2.2.1. Stage one
[Cohort selection based on grade point average (GPA)]
In stage one, students were divided into three groups based on their grades in the last semester. The classification based on GPA is as follows.
-
1.
(Low GPA) with GPA 2.80–2.89 [12 students fell in this group].
-
2.
(Good GPA) with GPA 2.90–2.99 [nine students fell in this group].
-
3.
(High GPA) with GPA 3.00 and over [six students fell in this group].
2.2.2. Stage two
In this stage, three groups were defined based on the teaching methodologies adopted. Every group comprised of nine students. Each group had an equal number of students from the GPA groups defined in stage one in order to decrease the chance of sampling bias. Details are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Distribution of student groups according to the GPA scores.
| GPA | Group One | Group Two | Group Three |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.80–2.89 [n = 12] | S1, S4, S7, S10 | S2, S5, S8, S11 | S3, S6, S9, S12 |
| 2.90–2.99 [n = 9] | S1, S4, S7 | S2, S5, S8 | S3, S6, S9 |
| 3.0–3.30 [n = 6] | S1, S4 | S2, S5 | S3, S6 |
S = students.
2.3. Teaching strategies adopted
The following are the three teaching strategies adopted to demonstrate CPR to the students:
-
1.
Demonstration through a detailed PowerPoint slide series that focused on the reasons for CPR, and the images that demonstrate the steps in CPR. [PowerPoint slides provided to students] [Group One].
-
2.
Demonstration using detailed PowerPoint slides that focused on the reasons for CPR, and a video to demonstrate the steps of CPR. [PowerPoint slides provided to students] [Group Two].
-
3.
Demonstration using Point power slides that focused on the reasons for CPR, with chalkboards and videos to demonstrate CPR. Furthermore, it was made clear to this group that the PowerPoint slides would not be provided at the end of the sessions and they must write down all the information on their personal notebooks. [Group Three].
2.4. Student evaluation and data analysis
Students were evaluated using a 20 multiple-choice questionnaire focusing on the critical steps that should be kept under consideration while performing CPR (American Heart Association, 2009). All the data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science Students, SPSS version 13®. Based on the responses attained, the comparison of the final score among the groups was done using one-way ANOVA.
3. Results
The CPR instructional session for each group lasted for approximately 5 h. At the end of the session, there was a practical demonstration using the mannequins. Students were provided with a 30-min break. They were evaluated using the 20-item questionnaire. On average, the students from Group Three had scored highest among all the three groups (Table 2). Analysis of the mean scores revealed that the students from Group Three had a significant knowledge difference from the other two groups (Table 3).
Table 2.
Final score evaluation of three groups.
| Students | Group One | Group Two | Group three |
|---|---|---|---|
| One | 15 | 14 | 18 |
| Two | 14 | 16 | 20 |
| Three | 15 | 13 | 16 |
| Four | 13 | 15 | 17 |
| Five | 13 | 15 | 16 |
| Six | 14 | 14 | 19 |
| Seven | 14 | 16 | 20 |
| Eight | 12 | 14 | 18 |
| Nine | 13 | 14 | 19 |
| Mean score ± SD | 13.7 ± 1.0 | 14.6 ± 1.01 | 18.1 ± 1.5 |
Group distribution is explained in Table 1.
Table 3.
Mean score comparison among the groups.
| Variable (I) | Variable (J) | Mean difference (I−J) | Std. error | Sig. | Confidence interval (95%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
| Group One | Group Two | −0.88889 | 0.282 | −2.3128 | 0.5350 | |
| Group Three | −4.44444 | <0.001 | −5.8683 | −3.0205 | ||
| Group Two | Group One | 0.88889 | 0.57018 | 0.282 | −0.5350 | 2.3128 |
| Group Three | −3.55556 | <0.001 | −4.9795 | −2.1317 | ||
| Group Three | Group One | 4.44444 | <0.001 | 3.0205 | 5.8683 | |
| Group Two | 3.55556 | <0.001 | 2.1317 | 4.9795 | ||
One way ANOVA was applied, p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
4. Discussion
Academicians are always in the quest to develop strategies that enhance students’ knowledge and learning. Recent advances in the field of medical science have uncovered the functional and cognitive aspects of the brain. These advances have enabled academicians to devise procedures that focus on brain-based strategies for the effective implementation of emotional/thematic instruction using mental models. The idea of brain-based learning models has also changed the perception of memory, assessment, and the learning environment (Tammy Cave and Wendy Williams, 2012). In brain-based learning, memory is one of the essential elements for retaining and processing information in different situations. The current study is one of the efforts to determine the effect of teaching methods to generate information in the long-term memory segment. In our sample, Group Three was the main focus group of this study where students were given more attention to demonstrate the concept of CPR using different instructional methods i.e. through PPT, videos, on white boards and mannequin practice. Furthermore, students in that group were instructed to take notes, as they knew that the handout/slides would not be available for them at the end of the session. Group Three was therefore subjected to a more intensive learning environment. This environment had a major impact on the students’ attention and it enhanced the learning process. In addition, equal distribution of students according to their previous grades decreased the chances of any bias and it verified the accomplishments of instructional strategies used for various groups. Our results indicate that the instruction method used for Group Three enabled the students to establish a long-term memory segment through Semantic, Episodic and Procedural memory followed by autonomic memory. Tileston (2005) has stated that long-term memory can be generated through Semantic, Episodic, Procedural, and autonomic. In addition, if the instructional environment enables the individual to effectively observe, hear, and perform an act, it will ease the process of shifting the information to the long-term memory segment and will ease the retrieval upon recall as well (Saunders, 2002).
Amazingly, the part of the brain that processes movement is the same part of the brain that processes learning. Therefore, it is suggested that one of the most effective tools to maximize student learning is the incorporation of movements into lessons (Jensen, 2005). Coordinated movements of the fingers while taking notes, along with observation, may have reinforced the learning in Group Three. Groups One and Two were watching and listening passively and that might have had diverted the attention at times. In terms of psychology, attention during the task is crucial for the achievement of effective outcomes. It is estimated that the normal usual attention span for an adult is around 20 min (David, 1996). Many educators believe that students cannot focus for longer periods during didactic lectures, but the attention span of students might vary from subject to subject and from teacher to teacher. The students’ involvement is one of the essential factors for attention during the class; Group Three students were more focused and involved in the sessions, as they knew that the supportive material would not be provided later.
In today’s practice, most of the schools are shifting to Problem-based learning (PBL) (Jensen, 2005). However, keeping in view the findings of this study, traditional chalkboard strategies will be an effective addition to provide an intensive learning environment to the students.
5. Conclusion
The findings demonstrate that Group Three managed to get higher score in the post-session evaluation. These results suggest that addition of traditional chalkboard teaching to the multimedia teaching strategies significantly improved the students’ understanding and learning in the CPR session, therefore enhancing the students’ memory of and learning about the concept being taught.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank the University Wellness Centre, Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing the CPR kits and mannequins. In addition, we are grateful to the medical and the nursing staff for their help in conducting the sessions at the Island College of Technology.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
References
- American Heart Association, 2009. CPR Electronic Modules. <http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/CPRAndECC/WorkplaceTraining/HeartsaverCourses/Heartsaver-Courses_UCM_001295_SubHomePage.jsp> (accessed 12.03.09).
- Bjork A. Is technology-based learning effective? Contemp. Educ. 1991;63:6–14. [Google Scholar]
- David M.I. Models of faculty development for problem-based learning. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 1996;1(1):69–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00596230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- David, C., Dianne, D., 2009. The essential 20: twenty components of 237 an excellent health care team. Rose Dog Books, 25–40. ISBN 978-1-4349-9555-1.
- Hassali M.A., Asrul A.S., Awaisu A. A public health pharmacy course at a Malaysian pharmacy school. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2009;73(7):136. doi: 10.5688/aj7307136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hossein N., Abdus S. The effect of PowerPoint presentations on student learning and attitudes. Global Perspect. Acc. Educ. 2005;2:53–73. [Google Scholar]
- Jensen, E. Teaching with the brain in mind. Memory recall. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve. 2005.
- McCarthy P. Strengths and Limitations of Teaching Methods. From “Getting the Most out of Your AIDS/HIV Trainings”, 1992. <http://www.socialwork.buffalo.edu/facstaff/documents/Strengths_of_teaching_Methods_handout.pdf> (accessed 18.02.09).
- Paivio A. Oxford University Press; 1986. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. [Google Scholar]
- Saunders A.D., Vawdrey C. Merging brain research with educational learning principles. Bus. Educ. Forum. 2002;57(1):44–46. [Google Scholar]
- Tammy, Cave and Wendy, Williams, 2012. Brain Based Learning. <http://education.alberta.ca/apps/aisi/literature/pdfs/bbased_learning.pdf> (accessed 12.03.12).
- Tileston D. second ed. Corwin Press; 2005. 10 Best Teaching Practices. [Google Scholar]

