Abstract
Introduction: To examine whether or not off-pump CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce) reduces the incidence of AF after cardiac surgery. Methods: The study was carried out in 939 consecutive coronary artery disease patients with sinus rhythm from which 383 patients underwent off-pump CABG, and 556 patients were operated through on-pump CABG. All patients were monitored postoperatively during intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Then, the incidence and predictive risk factors of post operative AF (POAF) in two groups were determined and compared with each other. Results: Overall, the mean age of the patients was 56.0±12.8 years with 234 patients (24.9%) being older than 65 years. POAF developed in 38 patients (9.9%) of the off-pump and in 93 patients (16.7%) of the on-pump CABG. There was significant difference between two groups when considering the incidence of POAF (P=0.002). Among preoperative risk factors, age>65 years had a significant association with the incidence of AF in both groups. This study also showed that most of the POAF cases converted to sinus rhythm after treatment. Moreover, these finding demonstrated that conversion to sinus rhythm is significantly more probable in off-pump group (P=0.006). Conclusion: A reduced prevalence of POAF could be observed in patients with off-pump as compared with on-pump techniques. Furthermore, conversion to sinus rhythm in off-pump group was significantly more probable than on-pump group.
Keywords: Off-pump CABG, On-pump CABG, Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation, Risk Factor
Introduction
With an estimated prevalence of 5% to 29%, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common postoperative complication in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, with a peak incidence between second to third postoperative days.1-3 Multifactorial mechanisms are blamed for postoperative AF in patients with the necessary atrial electrical substrate4,5 while it could be of either slow atrial conduction nature or dispersion of atrial refractoriness.6 It has been suggested that the incidence of postoperative AF may be increased as a consequence of surgical manipulation and, myocardial ischemia and inflammatory reactions related to perioperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).2 Interestingly, Off-pump CABG has been shown to be associated with a significant decrease in the inflammatory reactions7 and myocardial necrosis markers release8 compared with conventional CABG. If so, patients who undergo off-pump procedure should have a lower incidence of AF than patients undergoing standard CABG with CPB. Studies comparing off-pump CABG and CPB in younger patients group report contradictory evidence on the incidence of AF.9,10
The aim of this prospective study was to examine the influence of (off-pump versus on-pump) CABG approach and on POAF prevalence.
Materials and methods
This study was carried out on 939 consecutive coronary artery disease patients with sinus who were operated on at Shahid Madani heart center, Tabriz, Iran, in the period between April 2008 and May 2011. Patients with previous history of any surgery other than CABG, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, use of antiarrythmic drugs other than beta-blockers, and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia were excluded. A standard 12-lead ECG and trans-thoracic echocardiography laboratory tests were performed in all of the patients. For each patient a form including data related to preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative period was completed. The data were collected daily by trained and experienced research nurses.
In this study, 383 and 556 patients underwent off-pump and on-pump CABG, respectively. Clinical data are shown in Table 1. Off-pump CABG procedures were performed through a median sternotomy approach. Octopus was used to stabilize the target coronary vessel in all cases. Revascularization in on-pump CABG was performed by standard surgical technique with moderate systemic hyperthermia (30-32°c). Conduits for off-pump and on-pump CABG included the internal mammary artery or saphenous veins, or a combination of the two. All patients were continuously monitored postoperatively during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. A 12-lead ECG recording was performed if necessary to confirm the AF episodes. In the present study, POAF was defined as the characteristic arrhythmia lasting for more than 5 minutes confirmed by a cardiologist. Beta-blockers were used routinely postoperatively and POAF was treated by amiodarone and replacement of potassium and magnesium. Some of the intra- and perioperative risk factors which potentially could influence the POAF incidence were collected and compared between groups. All continuous variables were presented as mean±SD. Student t-test was used for analysis of continuous variables and Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the independent characteristics associated with POAF. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The software SPSS version 19 was used for statistical analysis.
Table 1. The clinical profile of 939 patients with ischemic heart disease admitted for CABG .
Characteristics | CABG with CPB (n=556) | OPCAB (n=383) | P-value |
Preoperative risk factors | |||
Age(year, mean±SD) | 54.8±13.9 | 58.9±10.6 | 0.000 |
Female patients | 191 (34.4) | 101 (26.4) | 0.005 |
Smoking | 202 (36.3) | 168 (43.9) | 0.012 |
History of MI | 123 (22.1) | 122 (31.9) | 0.001 |
History of cardiac surgery | 19 (3.4) | 2 (0.5) | 0.002 |
Diabetes | 78 (14.0) | 107 (27.9) | 0.000 |
COPD | 65 (11.7) | 37 (9.7) | 0.191 |
CVA | 17 (3.1) | 10 (2.6) | 0.422 |
Peripheral vascular disease | 7 (1.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0.097 |
Renal failure (cr=2.5) | 9 (1.6) | 10 (2.6) | 0.204 |
Beta-blocker consumption | 407 (73.2) | 313 (81.7) | 0.001 |
Calcium channel blocker use | 161 (29.0) | 132 (34.5) | 0.043 |
Diuretic consumption | 85 (15.3) | 43 (11.2) | 0.045 |
Digoxin use | 64 (11.5) | 18 (4.7) | 0.000 |
Amiodarone | 9 (1.6) | 1 (0.3) | 0.041 |
Bronchodilator | 19 (3.4) | 10 (2.6) | 0.308 |
Hypertension=140/90 mmHg | 43 (7.7) | 48 (12.5) | 0.000 |
Pulse=70 beat/min | 151 (27.2) | 122 (31.9) | 0.069 |
CCS>III | 26 (4.7) | 10 (2.6) | 0.072 |
NYHA Function Class=III | 300 (54.0) | 169 (44.1) | 0.002 |
Cardiomegaly | 114 (20.7) | 51 (13.4) | 0.002 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy | 25 (4.5) | 10 (2.6) | 0.089 |
Creatinine=1.4-2.5(mg/dl) | 37 (6.7) | 32 (8.4) | 0.196 |
Hemoglobin<12 (g/dl) | 84 (15.1) | 44 (11.5) | 0.067 |
Intraoperative risk factors | |||
Need of perioperative IABP | 18 (3.2) | 3 (0.8) | 0.009 |
Inotropic agents | 233 (41.9) | 32 (8.4) | 0.000 |
Dopamine | 31 (5.6) | 4 (1.0) | 0.000 |
Dobutamine | 200 (36.0) | 25 (6.5) | 0.000 |
Epinephrine | 21 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0.000 |
Norepinephrine | 13 (2.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0.007 |
Amrinone | 9 (1.6) | 3 (0.8) | 0.207 |
Milrinone | 33 (5.9) | 1 (0.3) | 0.000 |
Postoperative (ICU) risk factors | |||
Inotropic agents | 151 (27.2) | 37 (9.7) | 0.000 |
Beta blocker use | 407 (73.2) | 340 (88.8) | 0.000 |
AF rate | 93 (16.7) | 38 (9.9) | 0.002 |
Red blood cell transfusion | 84 (15.1) | 44 (11.5) | 0.067 |
In-hospital mortality | 5 (1.3) | 18 (3.2) | 0.044 |
AF= Atrial Fibrillation; CABG= Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; CCS= Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Score; COPD= Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CPB= Cardiopulmonary Bypass; CVA= Cerebrovascular Accident; IABP= Intra Aortic Balloon Pump; ICU= Intensive Care Unit; NYHA= New York Heart Association; OPCAB=Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Results
A total of the 939 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 647 (68.90%) were male and 292 (31.09%) female. The mean age of the patients was 56.5 ± 12.8 years with 234 patients (24.9%) being older than 65 years. The demographic characteristics of patients were summarized in Table 1. On-pump and off-pump CABG procedures were performed in 556 (59.21%) and 383 patients (40.79%), respectively. The mean period of observation during ICU stay was 3.4±2.4 days for off-pump and 4.6±5.1 for on-pump group. POAF occurred in 131 patients (13.45%); 38 patients (9.9%) in the off-pump and 93 patients (16.7%) in the on-pump CABG groups. There was significant difference between two groups considering the incidence of POAF (P=0.002).
The relations between the predisposing factors and occurrence of POAF in off-pump and on-pump CABG are outlined in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Among preoperative risk factors, age>65 years was of a significant association with the incidence of AF in both groups [off-pump 42.1% (P= 0.016) vs. on-pump 33.3%, (P=0.020)]. When considering hypertension as a predisposing factor, there was no significant difference between hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients in both groups [off-pump (P=0.336) vs. on-pump (P=0.162)]. Furthermore, in both groups duration of hospital stay was significantly higher in the AF patients compared to those remaining in sinus rhythm (Tables 2, 3).
Table 2. Predisposing factors and rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation in OPCAB patients .
Variable | OPCAB with AF (n=38) | OPCAB without AF (n=345) | P -value |
Female gender | 8 (21.1) | 93 (27.0) | 0.283 |
Age >65 | 16 (42.1) | 83 (24.1) | 0.016 |
Hypertension | 6 (15.8) | 42 (121.2) | 0.336 |
Not receiving Beta-blocker | 6 (15.8) | 64 (18.6) | 0.437 |
Not receiving CC.Blocker | 23 (60.5) | 228 (66.1) | 0.303 |
ICU stay (day, min±SD) | 4.2±2.9 | 3.3±2.3 | 0.023 |
Hospital stay (day, min±SD) | 8.0±3.9 | 7.1±3.2 | 0.122 |
In-hospital mortality | 0 (0) | 5 (1.4) | 0.591 |
AF=Atrial Fibrillation; CC.Blocker= Calcium Cchannel Blocker; ICU=Intensive Care Unit; OPCAB= Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; SD=Standard Deviation
Table 3. Predisposing factors and rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation in CABG patients .
Variable | CABG with AF (n=93) | CABG without AF (n=463) | P value |
Female gender | 60 (64.5) | 304 (65.8) | 0.450 |
Age>65 | 31 (33.3) | 104 (22.5) | 0.020 |
Hypertension | 10 (10.8) | 33 (7.1) | 0.162 |
Smoking | 24 (25.8) | 178 (38.4) | 0.013 |
Not receiving Beta-blocker | 17 (18.3) | 132 (28.5) | 0.026 |
Not receiving CC.Blocker | 58 (62.4) | 337 (72.8) | 0.031 |
CPB time (min, mean±SD) | 117.3±44.6 | 108.5±40.4 | 0.059 |
ACC time time (min, mean±SD) | 67.7±30.4 | 64.3±29.6 | 0.309 |
Cold blood cardioplegia | 91 (97.8) | 460 (99.4) | 0.197 |
Aortic root reperfusion | 62 (66.7) | 298 (64.5) | 0.393 |
Topical ice slush | 83 (91.2) | 425 (92.0) | 0.468 |
Cardiac venting techniques | 85 (93.4) | 439 (95.0) | 0.338 |
ICU stay (day, mean±SD) | 6.4±7.3 | 4.2±4.4 | 0.000 |
In-hospital stay | 10.7±7.4 | 8.9±5.4 | 0.010 |
ACC time=Aortic Cross-Clamp time; AF=Atrial Fibrillation; CABG= Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; CC.Blocker= Calcium Channel Blocker; CPB= Cardiopulmonary Bypass; ICU=Intensive Care Unit; SD=Standard Deviation
This study also demonstrated that most cases of the POAF converted to sinus rhythm through correction of electrolyte imbalance and administration of amiodarone (off-pump 94.7% vs. on-pump 82.8%). In addition, in-hospital mortality in on-pump group was significantly greater in patients who developed AF compared to group in sinus rhythm (P=0.005), but in off-pump group there was no death in patients who developed POAF.
Discussion
POAF is a common complication of CABG that occurs in 5-40% of patients during the first postoperative week.11 Although the cause of POAF in patients undergoing CABG remains unknown, numerous triggering risk factors have been proposed. Several reports have focused on the use of CPB as a significant factor. Only a few researchers have reported an association between bypass time and POAF12, some reporting lower incidence rates of POAF in patients undergoing off-pump CABG.3,13,14 It has Yet, there are reports claiming neither off-pump CABG nor on-pump CABG affected the occurrence of POAF.15,16 Our study was designed to determine if eliminating CPB would lower the incidence of POAF. The results of this prospective study analyzing patients undergoing CABG show that the introduction of an off-pump technique changes the occurrence of POAF. In the present study, POAF developed in 9.9% of the off-pump and in 16.7% of the on-pump CABG; there was significant difference between two groups when considering the incidence of POAF (P=0.002), consequently this data demonstrates the effect of CPB on the occurrence of POAF. Decreased rate of AF in patients who have undergone off-pump CABG have also been shown in other studies.9,17-20, In another study reported by Ascione et al.13, CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest was the main independent predictor of POAF in patients undergoing CABG. These findings, however, contrast with those from a more recent trial in which 281 patients undergoing first, elective, isolated CABG.21
The pathophysiological mechanisms of POAF have been the subject of assumptions despite broad investigations highlighting the identification of risk factors for the AF onset. The factors relating to CPB that may be important in the generation of POAF include ischemia during cardioplegic arrest and cannulation.2,22-24,Both of these problems should in theory be avoided in off-pump. Evidence that CPB has an immunological effect on the degree of inflammatory response and complement activation may be important in the generation of this POAF.25 In addition, off-pump CABG is associated with a significant reduction in the inflammatory response7 and in the release of markers of myocardial necrosis compared with on-pump CABG.8
Several independent risk factors are able to trigger the development of POAF. Advanced age is believed to be closely associated with the occurrence of AF26-29; so far, the only reliable risk factor for an increased incidence of POAF has been age≥ 60 years.2,4,5,26,30 In this present study, the probability of POAF also increased significantly as the patient's age increased over 65 years of age regardless of the method of myocardial revascularization. It is well documented that aging causes degenerative changes in the atrial myocardium leading to changes in electrical characteristics of the SA and AV nodes and atria and contributing to the fragmentation of the propagating impulse.31,32
There are also some reports that β-blockers are effective in preventing POAF33 and all identified meta-analyses have demonstrated that β-blockers significantly reduced the incidence of POAF.34-39 Increased sympathetic tone may predispose a patient to POAF and β-blockers target this pathway. Therefore, it seems that use of oral β-blockers both preoperatively and postoperatively prevents AF occurrences in the postoperative patients; however, our findings in on-pump group are in contrast with the similar reports in the literature. We noted an increase in POAF among patients who were on preoperative β-blockers. This finding may be related to the initiation of the β-blockers in the immediate postoperative period after patients were extubated. On the other hand, some studies have shown that the use of preoperative β-blockers and early postoperative withdrawal have been implicated in the etiology of POAF 40,41.40-41 Therefore, reinstitution of β-blocker agent immediately after operation can decrease the incidence of POAF. Furthermore, this finding may demonstrate the effect of CPB on the occurrence of POAF in these patients.
This study also showed that most of the POAF cases converted to sinus rhythm after treatment (off-pump 94.7% vs. on-pump 82.8%). Moreover, these findings displayed that conversion to sinus rhythm is significantly more probable in off-pump than in on-pump groups (P=0.006). In addition, this data indicated that in-hospital mortality in patients with POAF was 8.6% and 0% in on-pump and off-pump groups, respectively (P=0.005). Therefore, CPB not only could increase the rate of POAF but also might increase in-hospital mortality in patients with AF.
Conclusion
The results of the present study demonstrated that off-pump CABG, being a less invasive procedure, could reduce the incidence of postoperative AF in patients undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization. Furthermore, conversion to sinus rhythm in off-pump group is significantly more than on-pump group.
Footnotes
Ethical issues:The study was approved by the ethics committee of the university. Written informed consent was obtained from patients prior to the enrollment.
Competing interests:The authors had no competing interests to declare in relation to this article.
References
- 1.Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, VanderVliet M. et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996;94:390–7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, Friedman AS, Koch C, Mangano DT. et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes, and resource utilizationMultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA. 1996;276:300–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Ruchat P, Stumpe F, von Segesser LK. Did the introduction of a minimally invasive technique change the incidence of atrial fibrillation after single internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery grafting? . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:683–8. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.112529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cox JL. A perspective of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg . 1993;56:405–9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90871-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Amar D. Perioperative atrial tachyarrhythmias. Anesthesiology . 2002;97:1618–23. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Archbold RA, Curzen N. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: more than an irritation! Clinical Intensive Care. 1999;10:109–16. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gu YJ, Mariani MA, van Oeveren W, Grandjean JG, Boonstra PW. Reduction of the inflammatory response in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg . 1998;65:420–4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01127-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kilger E, Pichler B, Weis F, Goetz A, Lamm P, Schütz A. et al. Markers of myocardial ischemia after minimally invasive and conventional coronary operation. Ann Thorac Surg . 2000;70:2023–8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01848-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saatvedt K, Fiane AE, Sellevold O, Nordstrand K. Is atrial fibrillation caused by extracorporeal circulation? Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:931-3. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:931–3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00686-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Salamon T, Michler RE, Knott KM, Brown DA. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg . 2003;75:505–7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04305-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Terranova P, Carletti F, Valli P, Dell'Orto S, Enrico Maria G, Terranova P. Atrial fibrillation and revascularization procedures: clinical and prognostic significanceIncidence, predictors, treatment, and long-term outcome. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007;7:50–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 12.Roffman JA, Fieldman A. Digoxin and propranolol in the prophylaxis of supraventricular tachydysrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg . 1981;31:496–501. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)61337-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ascione R, Caputo M, Calori G, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Angelini GD. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery: A prospective, randomized study. Circulation . 2000;102:1530–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet . 2002;359:1194–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08216-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Place DG, Peragallo RA, Carroll J, Cusimano RJ, Cheng DC. Postoperative atrial fibrillation: a comparison of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth . 2002;16:144–8. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2002.31054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Siebert J, Anisimowicz L, Lango R, Rogowski J, Pawlaczyk R, Brzezinski M. et al. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: does the type of procedure influence the early postoperative incidence? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:455-9. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19:445–9. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00621-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cohn WE, Sirois CA, Johnson RG. Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: A retrospective, matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:298–301. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70426-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Puskas JD, Wright CE, Ronson RS, Brown WM 3rd, Gott JP, Guyton RA. Off-pump multivessel coronary bypass via sternotomy is safe and effective. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1068–72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00657-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, Kshettry VR, Janey PA, Petersen RJ. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:704–10. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01510-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Al-Ruzzeh S, Nakamura K, Athanasiou T, Modine T, George S, Yacoub M. et al. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:50–5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00654-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, Nathoe HM, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC. et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation. 2001;104:1761–6. doi: 10.1161/hc4001.097036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Creswell LL. Postoperative atrial arrhythmias: risk factors and associated adverse outcomes. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11:303–7. doi: 10.1016/s1043-0679(99)70073-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen XZ, Newman M, Rosenfeldt FL. Internal cardiac cooling improves atrial preservation: electrophysiological and biochemical assessment. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;46:406–11. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64653-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tchervenkov CI, Wynands JE, Symes JF, Malcolm ID, Dobell AR, Morin JE. Persistent atrial activity during cardioplegic arrest: a possible factor in the etiology of postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36:437–43. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60484-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:845–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maisel WH, Rawn JD, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:1061. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-12-200112180-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Almassi GH, Schowalter T, Nicolosi AC, Aggarwal A, Moritz TE, Henderson WG. et al. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event? Ann Surg. 1997;226:501–13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199710000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Terranova P, Carletti F, Valli P, Dell'Orto S, Enrico Maria G, Terranova P. Atrial fibrillation and revascularization procedures: clinical and prognostic significanceIncidence, predictors, treatment, and long-term outcome. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007;7:50–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 29.Haghjoo M, Basiri H, Salek M, Sadr-Ameli MA, Kargar F, Raissi K. et al. Predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2008;8:94–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stamou SC, Dangas G, Hill PC, Pfister AJ, Dullum MK, Boyce SW. et al. Atrial fibrillation after beating heart surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:64–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00829-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Spach MS, Dolber PC. Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at a microscopic level in human cardiac muscle. Evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ Res. 1986;58:356–71. doi: 10.1161/01.res.58.3.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Allessie MA, Boyden PA, Camm AJ, Kléber AG, Lab MJ, Legato MJ. et al. Pathophysiology and prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2001;103:769–77. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.5.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.White CM, Giri S, Tsikouris JP, Dunn A, Felton K, Reddy P. et al. A comparison of two individual amiodarone regimens to placebo in open heart surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:69–74. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03593-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Koniari I, Apostolakis E, Rogkakou C, Baikoussis NG, Dougenis D. Pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:121. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hammermeister KE, Morrison D. Coronary bypass surgery for stable angina and unstable angina pectoris. Cardiol Clin 1991;135–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hayashida N, Shojima T, Yokokura Y, Hoei H, Yoshikawa K, Tomoeda H. et al. P-wave signal-aneraged electrocardiogram for predicting atrial arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:859–64. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fleming GA, Marray KT, Yu C, Burbe JG, Petracek MR, Moff SJ. et al. Milrinone use is associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2008;118:1619–25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.790162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Smith PK, Buhrman WC, Levett JM, Ferguson TB, Holman WL, Cox JL. Supraventricular conduction abnormalities following cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovascular Surg. 1987;94:558–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rao V, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Ikonomidis JS, Christakis GT, David TE. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;122:38–51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70176-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Andrews TC, Reimold SC, Berlin JA, Antman EM. Prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgeryA meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circulation. 1991;84:236–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kowey PR, Taylor JE, Rials SJ, Marinchak RA. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of prophylactic drug therapy in preventing supraventricular arrhythmia early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:963–5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90802-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]