Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080356

Genetic Deletion of Afadin Causes Hydrocephalus by Destruction of Adherens Junctions in Radial Glial and Ependymal Cells in the Midbrain

Hideaki Yamamoto 1,2,3, Tomohiko Maruo 1,2,3, Takashi Majima 3,4,5, Hiroyoshi Ishizaki 3,5, Miki Tanaka-Okamoto 3,5, Jun Miyoshi 3,5, Kenji Mandai 1,2,3,*, Yoshimi Takai 1,2,3,4,*
Editor: Diego Fraidenraich6
PMCID: PMC3827428  PMID: 24236178

Abstract

Adherens junctions (AJs) play a role in mechanically connecting adjacent cells to maintain tissue structure, particularly in epithelial cells. The major cell–cell adhesion molecules at AJs are cadherins and nectins. Afadin binds to both nectins and α-catenin and recruits the cadherin-β-catenin complex to the nectin-based cell–cell adhesion site to form AJs. To explore the role of afadin in radial glial and ependymal cells in the brain, we generated mice carrying a nestin-Cre-mediated conditional knockout (cKO) of the afadin gene. Newborn afadin-cKO mice developed hydrocephalus and died neonatally. The afadin-cKO brain displayed enlarged lateral ventricles and cerebral aqueduct, resulting from stenosis of the caudal end of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the ventral part of the third ventricle. Afadin deficiency further caused the loss of ependymal cells from the ventricular and aqueductal surfaces. During development, radial glial cells, which terminally differentiate into ependymal cells, scattered from the ventricular zone and were replaced by neurons that eventually covered the ventricular and aqueductal surfaces of the afadin-cKO midbrain. Moreover, the denuded ependymal cells were only occasionally observed in the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct of the afadin-cKO midbrain. Afadin was co-localized with nectin-1 and N-cadherin at AJs of radial glial and ependymal cells in the control midbrain, but these proteins were not concentrated at AJs in the afadin-cKO midbrain. Thus, the defects in the afadin-cKO midbrain most likely resulted from the destruction of AJs, because AJs in the midbrain were already established before afadin was genetically deleted. These results indicate that afadin is essential for the maintenance of AJs in radial glial and ependymal cells in the midbrain and is required for normal morphogenesis of the cerebral aqueduct and ventral third ventricle in the midbrain.

Introduction

The aqueductal and ventricular walls of the brain are covered by a succession of epithelial cells, progressing from neuroepithelial to radial glial and eventually ependymal cells, over the course of development [1], [2]. These epithelial cells attach to each other via a junctional complex of adherens junctions (AJs) and tight junctions (TJs) to form a monolayer sheet. AJs play a role in mechanically connecting adjacent cells to maintain tissue structure particularly in many types of epithelial and endothelial cells, including neuroepithelial, radial glial, and ependymal cells [3]. TJs are developed in addition to AJs in epithelial and endothelial cells, including neuroepithelial and ependymal cells, but not in radial glial cells [2], [4]. TJs are localized at the most apical side of the cell–cell adhesion site and AJs are formed just at the basal side of TJs in epithelial cells [5]. TJs are crucial for the barrier function that prevents the passage of soluble molecules through the gaps between cells [4]. The formation and maintenance of TJs are regulated by AJs [6].

The major cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) at AJs are cadherins and nectins [7], [8]. Cadherins are key Ca2+-dependent CAMs with a single transmembrane segment and comprise a family consisting of over 100 members [8]. Cadherins directly bind to the adherens junctional components β-catenin and p120ctn [9]. β-Catenin in turn interacts with α-catenin, which binds many peripheral membrane proteins, such as vinculin, α-actinin, and EPLIN [9], [10], while p120ctn binds PLEKHA7 [11]. Nectins are Ca2+-independent immunoglobulin (Ig)-like CAMs with a single transmembrane segment and comprise a family consisting of four members: nectin-1, -2, -3, and -4 [7]. Nectins first form cell–cell adhesion and then recruit cadherins to the nectin-based cell–cell adhesion site to form AJs [7]. Nectins and cadherins are further involved in the formation of TJs [12] of which major CAMs are junction adhesion molecules, occludin, and claudins [13].

Afadin is localized at AJs in epithelial and endothelial cells and regulates the formation of AJs in cooperation with nectins and cadherins [14]. Afadin is an actin filament-binding protein, encoded by the MLLT4/AF-6 gene [15]. Afadin has some splicing isoforms and the longest one, l-afadin, hereafter referred to as afadin, is ubiquitously expressed including epithelial cells. Afadin was originally isolated as an actin filament-binding protein of which the nucleotide sequence was similar to that of the AF6 gene [15]. The AF-6 gene was originally reported as a fusion partner of the MLL (alias, ALL-1) gene in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome translocation [16]. Afadin contains multiple domains and interacts with many proteins including CAMs and their associating molecules and signaling molecules [14]. Afadin binds to not only nectins but also α-catenin, p120ctn, and PLEKHA7 and recruits the cadherin-β-catenin complex to the nectin-based cell–cell adhesion site to form AJs [7], [14], [17][20]. In addition, afadin binds to ZO-1 and recruits junctional adhesion molecules, occludin, and claudins to the apical side of the nectin-based cell–cell adhesion sites to form TJs [12], [21][25].

We previously reported that afadin knockout (KO) mice showed developmental defects in stages during and after gastrulation and that these mice died during early embryonic stages [26], hence making it difficult to analyze the effects of the afadin deficiency on the brain. To assess the function of afadin in the brain, we crossed afadin-floxed mice with nestin-Cre transgenic mice [27], [28] and generated the central nervous system (CNS)-specific conditional KO (cKO) mice of the afadin gene. The nestin gene encodes an intermediate filament protein strongly expressed in neural progenitor cells of CNS tissues from around embryonic day (E) 10.5 [28]. We found here that the afadin-cKO mice developed hydrocephalus.

Hydrocephalus is the pathological condition with an excessive accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the ventricle and caused by overproduction of CSF by the choroid plexus, a defect of CSF reabsorption, and/or impaired CSF flow [29]. CSF flows from the lateral ventricles through the paired foramina of Monro into the third ventricle, then passes the cerebral aqueduct and finally reaches the fourth ventricle. Congenital hydrocephalus is a developmental brain disorder. In humans, its incidence is about 1–3 in every 1,000 live birth. The cerebral aqueduct is the most common site of intraventricular blockage of the CSF [30]. Evidence has accumulated that neuroepithelial and ependymal cells lining the ventricular and aqueductal walls of the developing brain play a key role in the onset and evolution of congenital hydrocephalus [31].

In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of afadin in the brain by using the nestin-Cre-mediated cKO mice of the afadin gene and described that the afadin-cKO mice developed noncommunicative hydrocephalus, owing to the developmental defect in the midbrain.

Results

Hydrocephalus in nestin-Cre-mediated afadin-cKO mice

We generated the nestin-Cre-mediated cKO mice of the afadin gene as described in Materials and Methods. When the afadin-cKO mice were backcrossed into the genetic background of C57/BL6 mice from the mixed 129/Sv-C57/BL6 background, the afadin-cKO mice at postnatal day (P) 14 from the third backcross (N3) generation displayed the dome-shaped head and enlarged ventricles ( Fig. 1, A and B ) and died by P21 ( Fig. 1C ). These results indicate that the mixed 129/Sv-C57/BL6 background of the afadin-cKO mice developed hydrocephalus.

Figure 1. Gross phenotypes of the nestin-Cre-mediated cKO mice of the afadin gene.

Figure 1

(A) Appearance of the control and afadin-cKO mice at P14 from the third backcross (N3) generation. (left panel) The control mouse; and (right panel) the afadin-cKO mouse. Scale bar: 1 cm. (B) Brain sections stained with HE in the control and afadin-cKO mice at P14 from the N3 generation. (left panel) The control mouse; and (right panel) the afadin-cKO mouse. LV, lateral ventricle. Scale bar: 1 mm. (C) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the N3 generation of the control (n = 39) and afadin-cKO (n = 13) mice and the N10 generation of the control (n = 10) and afadin-cKO (n = 12) mice. (D) Appearance of the control and afadin-cKO mice at P0 from the N10 generation. (left panel) The control mouse; and (right panel) the afadin-cKO mouse. Scale bar: 1 cm.

It was previously shown that the C57/BL6 background mice developed more severe hydrocephalus than the mixed 129/Sv-C57/BL6 background mice [32][37]. Consistently, when the afadin-cKO mice were backcrossed into the genetic background of C57/BL6 mice, the congenic offspring (N10) were born in the expected Mendelian ratio, but all of the afadin-cKO mice died within 3 days after birth ( Fig. 1C ). The appearance of the whole body of the afadin-cKO mice at P0 was indistinguishable from that of the control mice ( Fig. 1D ). However, in hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of brain sections at P0, they displayed obviously enlarged lateral ventricles and the cerebral aqueduct as compared with those of the control brain ( Fig. 2, A–E ), while the forth ventricle of the afadin-cKO mice was similar to that of the control mice ( Fig. 2, A–D ). The cerebral cortex of the afadin-cKO mice was apparently thinner than that of the control mice ( Fig. 2, A and B ). These gross phenotypes suggest that the C57/BL6 background afadin-cKO mice show developmental defects with severe hydrocephalus.

Figure 2. Histological phenotypes of the afadin-cKO brain.

Figure 2

Sections were stained by HE. (A) the sagittal sections of the whole brain; (B) the coronal sections of the whole brain; (C) the sagittal sections of the fourth ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct; (D) the coronal sections of the fourth ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct; (E) the coronal sections of the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle; (F) the sagittal sections of the cerebral aqueduct; and (G) the coronal sections of the third ventricle in the control and afadin-cKO mice at P0 (A–E) and E13.5 (F–G). Asterisks: stenosed cerebral aqueduct. Arrows: ventral part of the third ventricle. Arrowheads: obliterated third ventricle. LV, lateral ventricle; Aq, aqueduct; 4V, fourth ventricle; 3V, third ventricle; Cb, cerebellum primordium. Scale bars: 1 mm (A and B) and 200 µm (C–G).

Stenosis of the caudal end of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the ventral part of the third ventricle in the afadin-cKO brain

To determine the defect responsible for hydrocephalus in the afadin-cKO mice, we first examined whether stenosis and/or obliteration are observed in the afadin-cKO brain. In histological analysis, the caudal end of the cerebral aqueduct, which connects the third ventricle to the fourth ventricle, was stenosed at P0 ( Fig. 2 , C and D, asterisks ). Furthermore, the ventral part of the third ventricle was obliterated in the afadin-cKO mice at P0 ( Fig. 2E , arrows ). The dorsal and ventral tissues beneath the stenosed area of the cerebral aqueduct and the bilateral tissues in the obliterated area of the third ventricle were fused. In contrast, the cerebral aqueduct of the afadin-cKO brain at E13.5 was almost normal and was indistinguishable from that of the control brain ( Fig. 2F , arrowheads ), while the ventral part of the third ventricle of the afadin-cKO brain was partly obliterated ( Fig. 2G ). These results indicate that the genetic deletion of afadin causes stenosis of the caudal end of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the ventral part of the third ventricle, leading to the onset and progression of hydrocephalus.

Disappearance of ependymal cells from the surface of the caudal ventral part of the third ventricle and the rostral cerebral aqueduct of the afadin-cKO brain

It was shown that stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct is caused by denudation of ependymal cells and appearance of reactive astrocytes [31], [38]. We therefore examined whether these phenotypes were observed in the afadin-cKO brain. Indeed, cells were occasionally observed in the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle near the walls of the afadin-cKO mice ( Fig. 2E, insets, and 2G, arrowheads ), suggesting that these cells might be denuded ependymal cells. Ependymal cells mature first in the narrow regions, such as the caudal ventral part of the third ventricle and the rostral cerebral aqueduct till the birth [39] and mature ependymal cells can be identified by the expression of the S100β protein [40]. In the control brain at P0, the intense immunofluorescence signal for the S100β protein was observed in the cells covering the surface of the caudal ventral part of the third ventricle and the rostral cerebral aqueduct ( Fig. 3 ). In contrast, the signal for the S100β protein was not observed at the rostral aqueduct or the obliterated ventral part of the third ventricle in the afadin-cKO brain, suggesting the disappearance of ependymal cells in the afadin-cKO brain ( Fig. 3 ). Conversely, the signal for glial fibrillary acidic protein, a marker for reactive astrocytes [41], was not observed in the cerebral aqueduct or the third ventricle of the control and the afadin-cKO mice at P0 (data not shown), indicating that astrocytes were not activated in the afadin-cKO brain. These results indicate that the genetic deletion of afadin causes the disappearance of ependymal cells at the caudal ventral part of the third ventricle and the rostral cerebral aqueduct, but does not activate the astrocytes.

Figure 3. Ependymal cells of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct in the afadin-cKO midbrain.

Figure 3

The coronal sections were stained with the anti-S100β Ab and DAPI in the control and afadin-cKO midbrains at P0; (a1 and a2) with the anti-S100β Ab; and (b1 and b2) with DAPI. (a1–c1) the control midbrain; and (a2–c2) the afadin-cKO midbrain. rAq, rostral aqueduct; v3V, ventral part of the third ventricle. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Aberrant location of radial glial cells and neurons in the afadin-cKO midbrain

Because ependymal cells are produced from radial glial cells [42], we examined whether the genetic deletion of afadin affected radial glial cells in the midbrain. We performed immunostaining with an anti-Sox2 antibody (Ab) to label radial glial cells in the midbrain at E16.5. Sox2-positive cells, which were normally restricted in the ventricular zone, were scattered throughout the ventricular and intermediate zones in the afadin-cKO midbrain ( Fig. 4 , a1 and a2 ). Moreover, we stained the control and afadin-cKO midbrains with an anti-class III β-tubulin Ab to label neurons [43]. In the control midbrain, the immunofluorescence signal was detected in the mantle zone, and the weak signal was observed in the intermediate zone ( Fig. 4 , b1 and b2 ). Conversely, in the afadin-cKO midbrain, the intense signal was observed at the surface of the cerebral aqueduct of the midbrain, in addition to the signal observed in the ventricular, intermediate, and mantle zones. These results indicate that radial glial cells were mislocalized in the afadin-cKO midbrain and that the surface of the cerebral aqueduct of the afadin-cKO midbrain was covered by neurons instead of radial glial and/or ependymal cells.

Figure 4. Distribution of radial glial cells and neurons in the afadin-cKO midbrain.

Figure 4

The coronal sections were stained with the anti-Sox2 and anti-class III β-tubulin Abs in the control and afadin-cKO midbrains at E16.5; (a1 and a2) with the anti-Sox2 Ab; and (b1 and b2) with the anti-class III β-tubulin Ab. (a1–c1) The control midbrain; and (a2–c2) the afadin-cKO midbrain. VZ, ventricular zone; IZ, intermediate zone; MZ, mantle zone; Aq, aqueduct. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Localization of afadin at AJs of radial glial and ependymal cells at the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle

Next, we examined the localization of afadin at the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle with immunofluorescence microscopy using the Ab that specifically recognizes l-afadin, but not s-afadin (l-afadin Ab). The immunofluorescence signal for afadin was highly concentrated at the apical surface of the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle at E13.5 and P0 in the control mice ( Fig. 5 , A–D, c1 ). The signal for afadin was co-localized with those for nectin-1 and N-cadherin, although the signal for N-cadherin was more broadly distributed along the lateral plasma membrane ( Fig. 5 , A–D, a1–d1 ). Because the apical surface of the lateral ventricles is covered by radial glial cells until around E15 and then covered by ependymal cells that are produced from radial glial cells between E14 and E16 [42], and N-cadherin and nectin-1 are major CAMs at AJs in the nervous tissues [44], [45], these results indicate that afadin is localized at AJs in radial glial and ependymal cells at the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle.

Figure 5. Localization of afadin and AJ proteins in the afadin-cKO cerebral aqueduct and third ventricle.

Figure 5

The sections of the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle were stained with the indicated Abs in the control and afadin-cKO mice at E13.5 and P0. (A and B) The cerebral aqueduct; (C and D) the third ventricle; (A and C) at E13.5; and (B and D) at P0; (a1 and a2) with the anti-N-cadherin Ab; (b1 and b2) with the anti-nectin-1 Ab; and (c1 and c2) with the anti-afadin Ab. (a1–d1) The control mice; and (a2–d2) the afadin-cKO mice. Aq, aqueduct; 4 V, fourth ventricle. Scale bars: 200 µm.

Gradual deletion of afadin and destruction of AJs in the afadin-cKO embryonic brain

AJs are already established in the neuroepithelium of the neural tube, which is a precursor to the brain [45], and therefore genetic deletion of afadin starts at E10.5 after the establishment of AJs in the afadin-cKO mice. To examine whether AJs are maintained at the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle during development in the afadin-cKO mice, we immunostained afadin, nectin-1, and N-cadherin using their respective Abs. In the afadin-cKO brain at E13.5, the signals for afadin, nectin-1, and N-cadherin were faintly observed at the surface of the cerebral aqueduct but were not observed at the third ventricle as compared with those of the control brain ( Fig. 5 , A and C ). At P0, the signals for afadin, nectin-1, and N-cadherin disappeared at the apical surface of the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle in the afadin-cKO brain ( Fig. 5 , B and D ). These results indicate that the afadin protein was gradually reduced and finally disappeared at AJs in radial glial and ependymal cells at the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle of the afadin-cKO mice and that this gradual deletion of the afadin protein caused the destruction of AJs, leading to the disappearance of these cells from the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle, and stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the third ventricle.

In the last set of experiments, to confirm that the afadin protein was indeed deleted in the afadin-cKO brain and to examine whether the protein levels of nectin-1 and N-cadherin were changed or not, we performed Western blotting using their respective Abs and another anti-afadin Ab that recognizes both l-afadin and s-afadin (l/s-Afadin Ab). We used the telencephalon for this Western blotting, because it was practically difficult to obtain the mesencephalon containing the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle. Two protein bands with molecular masses of 205 and 190 kDa were detected by the l/s-afadin Ab in the telencephalon of the control embryos at E13.5, E14.5, E15.5, and E18.5 and only one band with a molecular mass of 205 kDa was detected by the anti-l-afadin Ab ( Fig. 6 ). The intensities of both bands were slightly reduced in the afadin-cKO telencephalons at E13.5 as compared with those in the control telencephalons, but were further reduced at E14.5 and E15.5, and then were hardly detected at E18.5. Conversely, the protein levels of nectin-1 and N-cadherin were unchanged between E13.5 and E18.5, indicating that the disappeared immunofluorescence signals for nectin-1 and N-cadherin were not due to the reduction of these proteins. These results suggest that the afadin protein is gradually reduced and finally deleted without changes of the protein levels of nectin-1 and N-cadherin also in the mesencephalon.

Figure 6. Gradual deletion of the afadin protein in the afadin-cKO brain.

Figure 6

Lysates from the embryonic telencephalons were subjected to Western blotting using the indicated Abs. Arrows indicate the positions of l-afadin (upper) and s-afadin (lower) proteins. Molecular weight markers (kDa) are shown in the right. Con1, afadin +/f; Con2, afadin +/f; nestin-Cre; cKO, afadin f/f; nestin-Cre.

Discussion

To clarify the role of afadin in the development of the CNS, we generated the nestin-Cre-mediated cKO mice of the afadin gene and showed here that the genetic deletion of afadin in the brain caused hydrocephalus with stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the ventral part of the third ventricle. In the afadin-cKO mice, stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the third ventricle were observed at P0, but not at E13.5, indicating that the stenosis and obliteration gradually progressed during development. Hydrocephalus occurs by various mechanisms; excessive accumulation of CSF in the ventricles owing to an overproduction of CSF by the choroid plexus, defect of CSF reabsorption from the subarachnoid space, and impaired CSF flow [29]. We did not study here the effect of the genetic deletion of afadin on the overproduction of CSF by the choroid plexus and/or the defect of CSF reabsorption from the subarachnoid space. However, our results indicate that hydrocephalus in the afadin-cKO mice was initiated and progressed at least by impaired CSF flow owing to stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct and obliteration of the ventral part of the third ventricle, although a contribution of different mechanisms cannot be excluded for the hydrocephalus in the afadin-cKO mice.

Dilatation of ventricles and elevation of intraventricular pressure with hydrocephalus have harmful effects on the parenchyma and lead to edema, oxidative stress, proteolytic damages in the white matter, cell death, and reactive changes in glial cells [46][48]. In particular, gliosis contributes to the progression of the development of hydrocephalus by plugging the ventricle or the aqueduct. However, we did not detect reactive astrocytes at the stenosed area of the cerebral aqueduct and the obliterated area of the third ventricle at P0. It is unknown whether reactive astrocytes are observed in the earlier developmental stages, but the stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct and the obliterated area of the third ventricle induced by the genetic deletion of afadin is not accompanied with reactive astrocytes.

At the stenosed area of the cerebral aqueduct and the obliterated area of the third ventricle in the afadin-cKO mice at P0, we observed the fusion of the dorsal and ventral walls of the cerebral aqueduct and the bilateral walls of the third ventricles. This phenomenon was also found in the hyh mutant mice that developed hydrocephalus [31]. Conversely, in the physiological condition, tissue fusion processes are found during development of the palate, ventricular septum, neural tube, urethra, diaphragm, and eye [49]. Although they are anatomically different, the fusion mechanisms may be similar. When the fusion occurs, tissues proliferate and position themselves at a place close enough to fuse. Then, the epithelial cells of the apical luminal surface finally disappear or lose their epithelial features in various mechanisms, such as apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell migration, denudation, or combinations of these mechanisms, depending on the organs [49]. Indeed, we observed that ependymal cells disappeared in the afadin-cKO mice, as shown in the hyh mutant mice [31]. The position of the dorso-ventral tissues of the caudal end of the aqueduct and bilateral tissues of the ventral part of the third ventricle are close enough to fuse, resulting in the stenosis and obliteration in the afadin-cKO mice. The tissue fusion mechanisms may be similar between the fusion shown here in the afadin-cKO mice and the physiological embryogenesis.

In this study, we showed that the denudation of ependymal cells and the aberrant location of radial glial cells were observed in the afadin-cKO midbrain. The denudation of ependymal cells has also been found in several mutants that display hydrocephalus [31], [34], [50], [51]. Conversely, the ectopic location of radial glial cells in the midbrain has not been described. During the development, radial glial cells, in addition to ependymal cells, also exist at the surface of the aqueduct and the ventricle, because radial glial cells initially proliferate or differentiate into neurons and then gradually differentiate into ependymal cells [42]. We found here that radial glial cells, which were identified as Sox2-positive cells, were scattered from the ventricular zone to the intermediate zone of the afadin-cKO midbrain. This phenomenon is explained by the detachment of the apical end feet of the radial processes from the surface of the third ventricle and cerebral aqueduct by the destruction of AJs in the midbrain, as observed in the cerebral cortex of the N-cadherin cKO mice [52]. The ectopic location of radial glial cells could not produce ependymal cells at the appropriate positions, the surface of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct, causing the loss of ependymal cells at the surface. Consistently, we observed that the surface of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct of the afadin-cKO midbrain was covered and replaced by neurons, but not by either radial glial cells or ependymal cells. These results indicate that afadin is essential for the maintenance of the position of radial glial cells, which allow them to produce ependymal cells, and the maintenance of the epithelial sheet structure of ependymal cells to prevent the denudation. Furthermore, the ectopic location of radial glial cells before their differentiation to ependymal cells would also cause the loss of ependymal cells.

Although the hyh mutant mice are alive after the birth and die by 2 months of age [53], the afadin-cKO mice died within 3 days after birth, indicating that the afadin-cKO mice developed more severe hydrocephalus than the hyh mutant mice by another mechanism in addition to the denudation of ependymal cells. The disappearance of radial glial cells from the surface of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct may cause the impaired CSF flow during the development, accelerating the progression of hydrocephalus. It was shown that the ciliary defect in ependymal cells of the Celsr2/3- deficient mice developed hydrocephalus, owing to the impaired CSF circulation [54]. Radial glial cells as well as ependymal cells have primary cilia [55]. Primary cilia are well known as mechanosensory organelles [56]. During the developmental stage, radial glial primary cilia may function as detectors of the CSF flow to develop the planar cell polarity and to orient the flow, as shown in ependymal cilia [57], [58]. Thus, the combined mechanisms induced by the loss of radial glial cells from the surface of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct, in addition to the denudation of the ependymal cells, could result in more severe hydrocephalus than the hyh mutant mice.

AJs are essential for maintaining the epithelial sheet structure that covers the luminal surface of tubes, tubules, and cavity of many organs. The epithelial sheet structure is maintained not only by AJs but also by other cell–cell junctions, such as TJs, desmosomes, and GAP junctions, and cell-matrix junctions, such as hemidesmosomes [4], [59][61]. Epithelial cells attach to the basement membrane through hemidesmosomes and disruption of this apparatus causes detachment of the epithelial sheet [62]. However, AJs are particularly important in the sense that they regulate these other junctions and destruction of AJs causes detachment of epithelial cells [63]. Afadin is a key molecule for the formation and maintenance of AJs in cooperation with nectins and cadherins [14]. In addition, it is important for the formation of tight junctions and desmosomes [64], [65]. Consistently, we showed here that afadin was colocalized with nectin-1 and N-cadherin in radial glial and ependymal cells in the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle and that the genetic deletion of afadin destructed AJs and caused the denudation of ependymal cells and ectopic location of radial glial cells from the surface of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct. Because AJs in the midbrain were already established before afadin was genetically deleted in the afadin-cKO mice, these results indicate that afadin is essential for the maintenance of AJs in radial glial and ependymal cells covering the wall of the cerebral aqueduct and the third ventricle and that the destruction of AJs causes the denudation of ependymal cells and ectopic location of radial glial cells.

It was shown that the genetic deletion of other components of AJs, such as β-catenin and α-catenin, and the cell polarity protein aPKCλ, numb, and numbl destructed AJs in neuroepithelial and radial glial cells of the ventricles and develops hydrocephalus [34], [50], [51], [66], [67]. Although it was not known whether the genetic deletion of these molecules causes the stenosis or obliteration of the cerebral aqueduct or the third ventricle, it would cause the phenotypes similar to those observed in the genetic deletion of afadin. The present results together with these earlier observations make it evident that AJs in neuroepithelial cells, radial glial cells, and ependymal cells lining the ventricular and aqueductal walls are essential for maintaining the physical and normal functions of these cells and for preventing hydrocephalus.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kobe University (Permit Number: P130205) and carried out according to the Kobe University Animal Experimentation Regulation. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Mice

The afadin-floxed mice [27] and nestin-Cre transgenic mice [28] were described previously. The homozygous and heterozygous mice carrying the afadin conditional allele is referred to as afadin f/f and afadin +/f, respectively. To obtain the nestin-Cre-mediated cKO mice of the afadin gene, afadin f/f mice were mated with afadin +/f mice expressing Cre-recombinase under the control of the nestin promoter. All of the experiments were performed by using littermates. The morning after coitus and the day of birth were defined as E0.5 and P0, respectively.

Abs

All of the following primary Abs were purchased from commercial sources: rabbit anti-l-afadin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), rabbit anti-l/s-afadin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), rat anti-nectin-1 (MBL, Nagoya, Japan), mouse anti-N-cadherin (clone 32, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), rabbit anti-S100β (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), mouse anti-class III β-tubulin (clone Tuj1, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and rabbit anti-Sox2 (Cell signaling, Minneapolis, MN, USA) Abs. Alexa-Fluor 488, 555, and 647-conjugated and Cy3-conjugated goat secondary Abs were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA), respectively. 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan).

Immunostaining

Mouse brains were dissected out from embryos and fixed at 4°C for 2 h in 1% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (PB) for staining with the anti-S100β, anti-Sox2, and anti-class III β-tubulin Abs and in 2% paraformaldehyde, 4% sucrose, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate in Hank's balanced salt solution with calcium and magnesium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3) for staining with the anti-l-afadin, anti-nectin-1, and anti-N-cadherin Abs. The fixed brain samples were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PB and embedded in OCT compound (Tissue Tek, Torrance, CA, USA). The sections at 12-µm thickness were mounted on glass slides. The sections were washed once for 10 min in PBS(-) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), then blocked at room temperature for 1 h in 5% normal goat serum and 0.2% Triton X100 in PBS(-), and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary Abs, which were diluted in the blocking reagent for staining with the anti-S100β, anti-Sox2, and anti-class III β-tubulin Abs or in a Can Get Signal immunoreaction enhancer solution B (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) for staining with the anti-l-afadin, anti-nectin-1, and anti-N-cadherin Abs. After being washed in PBST three times for 5 min, the sections were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with secondary Abs, which were diluted in the blocking solution for staining with the anti-S100β, anti-Sox2, and anti-class III β-tubulin Abs or in a Can Get Signal immunoreaction enhancer solution B (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) for staining with the anti-l-afadin, anti-nectin-1, and anti-N-cadherin Abs. After being washed in PBST three times for 5 min, the samples were mounted in a FluorSave reagent (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and observed with LSM700 or LSM510 META confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Histology

Mouse brains were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C for overnight. For Figure 1B, the adult brains were dehydrated in ethanol series and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin sections (4-5 µm) were stained with HE. For Figure 2, the embryonic brains were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PB and embedded in OCT compound (Tissue Tek, Torrance, CA, USA). The frozen sections (12 µm) were stained with HE.

Western blotting

Telencephalons were dissected, put in tubes, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until use. The tissues were homogenized with a Teflon-glass homogenizer in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg ml–1 leupeptin, 1.5 µg ml–1 aprotinin. Then, salt concentration was adjusted to 150 mM NaCl and 10% (wt vol−1) glycerol in addition to the above components. The homogenates were centrifuged at 800× g at 4°C for 5 min and the supernatants were collected. Protein concentrations were quantified with BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Protein lysates (10 µg of protein each) were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred onto PVDF membrane sheets, and blotted with Abs. Immunodetection was performed with Immobilon Western (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and LAS-4000 luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Global COE Program “Global Center for Education and Research in Integrative Membrane Biology”, the Targeted Proteins Research Program, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (“Brain Environment” and “Neural Diversity and Neocortical Organization”) (for K.M.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (for Y.T.) and (C) (for K.M.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the grants (for Y.T.) from the Yasuda Medical Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Del Bigio MR (2010) Ependymal cells: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol 119: 55–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Götz M, Huttner WB (2005) The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 777–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gumbiner BM (1996) Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84: 345–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Schneeberger EE, Lynch RD (1992) Structure, function, and regulation of cellular tight junctions. Am J Physiol 262: L647–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. González-Mariscal L, Betanzos A, Nava P, Jaramillo BE (2003) Tight junction proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 81: 1–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gumbiner B, Simons K (1986) A functional assay for proteins involved in establishing an epithelial occluding barrier: identification of a uvomorulin-like polypeptide. J Cell Biol 102: 457–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Takai Y, Ikeda W, Ogita H, Rikitake Y (2008) The immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule nectin and its associated protein afadin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 309–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Takeichi M (1990) Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell-cell adhesion. Annu Rev Biochem 59: 237–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nagafuchi A (2001) Molecular architecture of adherens junctions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13: 600–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Abe K, Takeichi M (2008) EPLIN mediates linkage of the cadherin catenin complex to F-actin and stabilizes the circumferential actin belt. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 13–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Meng W, Mushika Y, Ichii T, Takeichi M (2008) Anchorage of microtubule minus ends to adherens junctions regulates epithelial cell-cell contacts. Cell 135: 948–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fukuhara A, Irie K, Yamada A, Katata T, Honda T, et al. (2002) Role of nectin in organization of tight junctions in epithelial cells. Genes Cells 7: 1059–1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shin K, Fogg VC, Margolis B (2006) Tight junctions and cell polarity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22: 207–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mandai K, Rikitake Y, Shimono Y, Takai Y (2013) Afadin/AF-6 and canoe: roles in cell adhesion and beyond. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 116: 433–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mandai K, Nakanishi H, Satoh A, Obaishi H, Wada M, et al. (1997) Afadin: A novel actin filament-binding protein with one PDZ domain localized at cadherin-based cell-to-cell adherens junction. J Cell Biol 139: 517–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Prasad R, Gu Y, Alder H, Nakamura T, Canaani O, et al. (1993) Cloning of the ALL-1 fusion partner, the AF-6 gene, involved in acute myeloid leukemias with the t(6;11) chromosome translocation. Cancer Res 53: 5624–5628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tachibana K, Nakanishi H, Mandai K, Ozaki K, Ikeda W, et al. (2000) Two cell adhesion molecules, nectin and cadherin, interact through their cytoplasmic domain-associated proteins. J Cell Biol 150: 1161–1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hoshino T, Sakisaka T, Baba T, Yamada T, Kimura T, et al. (2005) Regulation of E-cadherin endocytosis by nectin through afadin, Rap1, and p120ctn. J Biol Chem 280: 24095–24103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sato T, Fujita N, Yamada A, Ooshio T, Okamoto R, et al. (2006) Regulation of the assembly and adhesion activity of E-cadherin by nectin and afadin for the formation of adherens junctions in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem 281: 5288–5299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kurita S, Yamada T, Rikitsu E, Ikeda W, Takai Y (2013) Binding between the Junctional Proteins Afadin and PLEKHA7 and Implication in the Formation of Adherens Junction in Epithelial Cells. J Biol Chem. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21. Ooshio T, Kobayashi R, Ikeda W, Miyata M, Fukumoto Y, et al. (2010) Involvement of the interaction of afadin with ZO-1 in the formation of tight junctions in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem 285: 5003–5012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fukuhara A, Irie K, Nakanishi H, Takekuni K, Kawakatsu T, et al. (2002) Involvement of nectin in the localization of junctional adhesion molecule at tight junctions. Oncogene 21: 7642–7655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kuramitsu K, Ikeda W, Inoue N, Tamaru Y, Takai Y (2008) Novel role of nectin: implication in the co-localization of JAM-A and claudin-1 at the same cell-cell adhesion membrane domain. Genes Cells 13: 797–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yamada T, Rikitsu E, Kurita S, Ikeda W, Takai Y (in press) Nectin and JAM are critical cell adhesion molecules for the apico-basal alignment of adherens and tight junctions in epithelial cells. Genes toCcells. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25. Yokoyama S, Tachibana K, Nakanishi H, Yamamoto Y, Irie K, et al. (2001) alpha-catenin-independent recruitment of ZO-1 to nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites through afadin. Mol Biol Cell 12: 1595–1609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ikeda W, Nakanishi H, Miyoshi J, Mandai K, Ishizaki H, et al. (1999) Afadin: A key molecule essential for structural organization of cell-cell junctions of polarized epithelia during embryogenesis. J Cell Biol 146: 1117–1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Majima T, Ogita H, Yamada T, Amano H, Togashi H, et al. (2009) Involvement of afadin in the formation and remodeling of synapses in the hippocampus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 385: 539–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tronche F, Kellendonk C, Kretz O, Gass P, Anlag K, et al. (1999) Disruption of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in the nervous system results in reduced anxiety. Nat Genet 23: 99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pérez-Fígares JM, Jimenez AJ, Rodríguez EM (2001) Subcommissural organ, cerebrospinal fluid circulation, and hydrocephalus. Microsc Res Tech 52: 591–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cinalli G, Spennato P, Nastro A, Aliberti F, Trischitta V, et al. (2011) Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis. Childs Nerv Syst 27: 1621–1642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wagner C, Batiz LF, Rodríguez S, Jiménez AJ, Páez P, et al. (2003) Cellular mechanisms involved in the stenosis and obliteration of the cerebral aqueduct of hyh mutant mice developing congenital hydrocephalus. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62: 1019–1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Goto J, Tezuka T, Nakazawa T, Sagara H, Yamamoto T (2008) Loss of Fyn tyrosine kinase on the C57BL/6 genetic background causes hydrocephalus with defects in oligodendrocyte development. Mol Cell Neurosci 38: 203–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wyss L, Schäfer J, Liebner S, Mittelbronn M, Deutsch U, et al. (2012) Junctional adhesion molecule (JAM)-C deficient C57BL/6 mice develop a severe hydrocephalus. PLoS One 7: e45619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dahme M, Bartsch U, Martini R, Anliker B, Schachner M, et al. (1997) Disruption of the mouse L1 gene leads to malformations of the nervous system. Nat Genet 17: 346–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang W, Yi MJ, Chen X, Cole F, Krauss RS, et al. (2006) Cortical thinning and hydrocephalus in mice lacking the immunoglobulin superfamily member CDO. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3764–3772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tapanes-Castillo A, Weaver EJ, Smith RP, Kamei Y, Caspary T, et al. (2010) A modifier locus on chromosome 5 contributes to L1 cell adhesion molecule X-linked hydrocephalus in mice. Neurogenetics 11: 53–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Utriainen A, Sormunen R, Kettunen M, Carvalhaes LS, Sajanti E, et al. (2004) Structurally altered basement membranes and hydrocephalus in a type XVIII collagen deficient mouse line. Hum Mol Genet 13: 2089–2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Páez P, Bátiz LF, Roales-Buján R, Rodríguez-Pérez LM, Rodríguez S, et al. (2007) Patterned neuropathologic events occurring in hyh congenital hydrocephalic mutant mice. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 66: 1082–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Silva-Alvarez C, Carrasco M, Balmaceda-Aguilera C, Pastor P, García MeL, et al. (2005) Ependymal cell differentiation and GLUT1 expression is a synchronous process in the ventricular wall. Neurochem Res 30: 1227–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Vives V, Alonso G, Solal AC, Joubert D, Legraverend C (2003) Visualization of S100B-positive neurons and glia in the central nervous system of EGFP transgenic mice. J Comp Neurol 457: 404–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Eng LF, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Bignami A, Gerstl B (1971) An acidic protein isolated from fibrous astrocytes. Brain Res 28: 351–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Spassky N, Merkle FT, Flames N, Tramontin AD, García-Verdugo JM, et al. (2005) Adult ependymal cells are postmitotic and are derived from radial glial cells during embryogenesis. J Neurosci 25: 10–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sullivan KF (1988) Structure and utilization of tubulin isotypes. Annu Rev Cell Biol 4: 687–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Takahashi K, Nakanishi H, Miyahara M, Mandai K, Satoh K, et al. (1999) Nectin/PRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with Afadin, a PDZ domain-containing protein. J Cell Biol 145: 539–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hatta K, Takeichi M (1986) Expression of N-cadherin adhesion molecules associated with early morphogenetic events in chick development. Nature 320: 447–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Socci DJ, Bjugstad KB, Jones HC, Pattisapu JV, Arendash GW (1999) Evidence that oxidative stress is associated with the pathophysiology of inherited hydrocephalus in the H-Tx rat model. Exp Neurol 155: 109–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Del Bigio MR (2000) Calcium-mediated proteolytic damage in white matter of hydrocephalic rats? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59: 946–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Del Bigio MR, Zhang YW (1998) Cell death, axonal damage, and cell birth in the immature rat brain following induction of hydrocephalus. Exp Neurol 154: 157–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ray HJ, Niswander L (2012) Mechanisms of tissue fusion during development. Development 139: 1701–1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Rasin MR, Gazula VR, Breunig JJ, Kwan KY, Johnson MB, et al. (2007) Numb and Numbl are required for maintenance of cadherin-based adhesion and polarity of neural progenitors. Nat Neurosci 10: 819–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Imai F, Hirai S, Akimoto K, Koyama H, Miyata T, et al. (2006) Inactivation of aPKClambda results in the loss of adherens junctions in neuroepithelial cells without affecting neurogenesis in mouse neocortex. Development 133: 1735–1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Kadowaki M, Nakamura S, Machon O, Krauss S, Radice GL, et al. (2007) N-cadherin mediates cortical organization in the mouse brain. Dev Biol 304: 22–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bronson RT, Lane PW (1990) Hydrocephalus with hop gait (hyh): a new mutation on chromosome 7 in the mouse. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 54: 131–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Tissir F, Qu Y, Montcouquiol M, Zhou L, Komatsu K, et al. (2010) Lack of cadherins Celsr2 and Celsr3 impairs ependymal ciliogenesis, leading to fatal hydrocephalus. Nat Neurosci 13: 700–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Mirzadeh Z, Han YG, Soriano-Navarro M, García-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A (2010) Cilia organize ependymal planar polarity. J Neurosci 30: 2600–2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Singla V, Reiter JF (2006) The primary cilium as the cell's antenna: signaling at a sensory organelle. Science 313: 629–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Guirao B, Meunier A, Mortaud S, Aguilar A, Corsi JM, et al. (2010) Coupling between hydrodynamic forces and planar cell polarity orients mammalian motile cilia. Nat Cell Biol 12: 341–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Mitchell B, Jacobs R, Li J, Chien S, Kintner C (2007) A positive feedback mechanism governs the polarity and motion of motile cilia. Nature 447: 97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Delva E, Tucker DK, Kowalczyk AP (2009) The desmosome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1: a002543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Goodenough DA, Paul DL (2009) Gap junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1: a002576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Borradori L, Sonnenberg A (1996) Hemidesmosomes: roles in adhesion, signaling and human diseases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 8: 647–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. van der Neut R, Krimpenfort P, Calafat J, Niessen CM, Sonnenberg A (1996) Epithelial detachment due to absence of hemidesmosomes in integrin beta 4 null mice. Nat Genet 13: 366–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dejana E (1996) Endothelial adherens junctions: implications in the control of vascular permeability and angiogenesis. J Clin Invest 98: 1949–1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Getsios S, Huen AC, Green KJ (2004) Working out the strength and flexibility of desmosomes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 271–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Matter K, Balda MS (2003) Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 225–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Lien WH, Klezovitch O, Fernandez TE, Delrow J, Vasioukhin V (2006) alphaE-catenin controls cerebral cortical size by regulating the hedgehog signaling pathway. Science 311: 1609–1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ohtoshi A (2008) Hydrocephalus caused by conditional ablation of the Pten or beta-catenin gene. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 5: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES