Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology logoLink to World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
. 2013 Nov 15;5(11):198–203. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i11.198

Striking similarities in genetic aberrations between a rectal tumor and its lung recurrence

Osama E Rahma 1,2,3,4, Mauricio Burotto 1,2,3,4, Luisa Matos Do Canto 1,2,3,4, Alexandre A Germanos 1,2,3,4, Bassem R Haddad 1,2,3,4, John L Marshall 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC3828635  PMID: 24244806

Abstract

We are reporting on a colorectal cancer patient with the longest disease-free interval ever published, where chromosomal microarray analysis was used to confirm the link between the primary and metastatic lesions. This rare case reports on a patient with late recurrence of colorectal cancer in the lung 19 years after its initial diagnosis. We used high-resolution array CGH (aCGH) to analyze the genetic aberrations of both the primary rectal and the recurrent metastatic lung lesions. Interestingly, we found striking similarities between the two lesions, despite the 19 years disease-free interval. In addition, most of the genes that were previously reported to be associated with a high recurrence score showed copy number gains by aCGH in one or both lesions. Our findings suggest that aCGH may be a helpful tool in analyzing the origin of metastases and underline the need for a better understanding of the characteristics of rectal tumors that have a late recurrence potential.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Genetic aberrations, Delayed, Recurrence, High-resolution array CGH.


Core tip: The role of genetic profiling in determining the risk of recurrence in colorectal cancer has been under serious investigation. This case report not only represents the longest rectal cancer disease-free interval in the literature, but also applies genetic analysis as a tool to confirm the similarity of the original and metastatic tumor and to predict the risk of recurrence.

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a high incidence worldwide with more than 1.2 million new cases diagnosed in 2008[1]. The 5-year overall survival in the United States for all stages is 61%[2]. Rectal cancer accounts for approximately 30% of CRC cases[3]. The treatment of localized rectal tumors differs from colon tumors in that it involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes surgery, radiation and chemotherapy[4]. The goal of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment is to decrease local and distant recurrence of the disease[5]. As of today, we do not have predictive biomarkers that indicate when a particular patient will benefit from systemic chemotherapy or, more importantly, in which cases the tumor will recur. Preliminary molecular tools have been developed to help predict which patient is more likely to experience disease recurrence and eventually die from the disease[6,7]. Despite these efforts we only partially understand the complexity of rectal cancer, clonal evolution and dormancy of micro-metastatic disease[8,9]. In this report we present the case of a long term survivor of CRC with a delayed recurrence almost two decades later.

CASE REPORT

An 81-years-old Caucasian male initially presented with rectal bleeding in 1991. He underwent a colonoscopy with biopsy that was later tested and revealed a wild type K-ras moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with stage IIIB (T3N1M0) rectal cancer and treated with surgical resection and colostomy followed by chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin. He subsequently underwent a colostomy reversal and remained in remission with no evidence of disease until 2011 when he developed a cough and was found to have a lung mass in the right upper lobe (RUL) and right sided mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (Figure 1). A PET scan showed the RUL mass to be 8.2 cm × 7.3 cm with SUV of 14.5, and confirmed the right-sided mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, in addition to a 1.2 cm nodule in the left costophrenic angle with no FDG activity. He underwent bronchoscopy and biopsy that revealed a wild type K-ras adenocarcinoma of colonic primary, CDX2/CK20 positive and TTF1/CK7/CD58 negative. The tumor characteristics were consistent with the primary tumor. The patient had a colonoscopy that only showed friable rectal mucosa with no evidence of malignancy. Accordingly, the patient was treated with FOLFOX (5-FU, oxaliplatin and leucovorin) in combination with bevacizumab for his recurrent metastatic rectal cancer. He received 10 cycles of FOLFOX/bevacizumab. The oxaliplatin was stopped due to cumulative neuropathy and he was switched to capecitabine and bevacizumab. The patient had a good response to chemotherapy by PET scan that showed a decrease in the RUL mass size (from 8.2 to 6.6 cm) and SUV (from 14.5 to 4.6), in addition to a decrease in the bilateral hilar and subcarinal lymph nodes’ uptake. Given the patient good response to chemotherapy he subsequently underwent right upper and middle lobectomies in July 2012. His pathology showed metastatic adenocarcinoma with extensive necrosis consistent with his known primary colorectal carcinoma. Given the dormancy of his disease for so many years, the options were presented to the patient including watchful waiting versus maintenance chemotherapy with capecitabine for 1-2 years. The patient opted not to proceed with more treatment and to be monitored with regular CT-scans.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chest computed tomography-scan demonstrating a 7.9 cm × 7.8 cm mass in the right upper lobe and right sided mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy.

Genetic aberrations in the metastatic lung lesion compared to the primary rectal carcinoma

In order to compare the DNA copy number changes in the metastatic lung lesion to the changes in the primary tumor, we evaluated both lesions by high-resolution aCGH analysis using an Agilent® platform (SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray Kit 8x60K, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissues using a standard phenol-chloroform laboratory protocol and cleaned with a MinElute® Reaction Cleanup Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Commercially available, pooled, normal control DNA (Promega, Madison, WI) was used as a reference DNA. aCGH experiments were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modifications. In brief, tumor and reference DNA were labeled using enzymatic labeling (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), hybridized for 40 h at 65 °C, washed, and immediately scanned using Agilent Scanner (G2505C). Data were extracted using Agilent Feature Extraction 10.7.3.1 software, and analyzed with Agilent Workbench 7.0 software. High-resolution aCGH analysis showed that both lesions share a large number of similar aberrations (Table 1 and Figure 2). Review of these aberrations revealed that many of them have been reported to be very common in colorectal cancers (e.g., segments with copy number increase on chromosomes 13, 7, 8q, and 20q)[9,10], thus supporting the conclusion that the lung lesion is a recurrent metastasis from the primary rectal lesion.

Table 1.

Genetic aberrations in the primary rectal tumor, the metastatic lung lesion, and both lesions by array comparative genomic hybridization analysis

Chr Cytoband Base pair
Aber
Start Stop
Recurrent metastatic lung lesion chr1 p34.2-p34.1 40022181 45250726 G
chr1 q21.1- q44 143700072 245804497 G
chr2 p25.3-p11.2 32444 89387655 G
chr2 q11.2-q37.3 96143358 241478888 G
chr4 q32.1- q35.1 156452014 186681608 L
chr6 p25.3-p11.1 200350 58722020 G
chr7 p12.3-p11.1 49282714 57498383 G
chr7 q11.21-q22.1 62291739 99905860 G
chr7 q36.1-q36.3 150049339 158781397 G
chr8 p23.1- p12 12627630 32499834 L
chr8 p12-p11.21 32882718 42971936 G
chr8 q11.21-q24.3 48549253 146250824 G
chr9 q33.2-q34.3 124984647 139633014 G
chr10 q22.3-q24.2 80370579 101360302 L
chr10 q26.3 131868597 134682710 L
chr11 p15.5-p11.12 974637 48986659 G
chr13 q12.11-q34 18556982 113766081 G
chr15 q25.3-q26.3 83411251 96875147 G
chr19 p13.3-p13.11 318892 19154766 G
chr20 q11.21-q13.33 29436537 62320720 G
chrX p11.23-p11.1 48639378 57116899 G
chrX q11.1-q28 61980262 154886101 G
chrY p11.31-p11.2 2716461 8521949 L
chrY q11.21-q11.221 13208776 17558012 L
Primary rectal lesion chr1 q21.1-q44 143700072 243198779 G
chr2 p25.3-p11.2 698239 89387655 G
chr2 q11.1-q37.3 95562654 241301905 G
chr3 p26.3-p11.1 134711 90336752 G
chr3 q11.2-q29 95063426 197289184 G
chr6 q11.1-q27 63002508 170700061 G
chr7 p22.3-p11.2 524935 55936992 G
chr7 q11.21-q36.3 62291739 158602499 G
chr8 p23.3-p12 369418 32621998 L
chr8 p12-p11.21 32705506 42971936 G
chr8 q11.1-q24.3 47800500 146024209 G
chr9 p24.3-p13.2 319684 37451026 G
chr11 p15.5-p11.2 2121540 46490960 G
chr13 q11-q34 18361637 113964366 G
chr20 q11.21-q13.33 29352138 62343283 G
chrX p22.33-p11.1 2719027 58068490 G
chrX q11.1-q28 61848414 154561665 G
chrY p11.31-p11.2 2716461 10511314 L
chrY q11.21-q11.23 12593244 27176992 L
Common aberrations between the two lesions chr1 q21.1-q44 143700072 243198779 G
chr2 p25.3-p11.2 698239 89387655 G
chr2 q11.2-q37.3 96143358 241301905 G
chr7 p12.3-p11.2 49282714 55936992 G
chr7 q11.21-q22.1 62291739 99905860 G
chr7 q36.1- q36.3 150049339 158602499 G
chr8 p23.1- p12 12627630 32499834 L
chr8 p12-p11.21 32882718 42971936 G
chr8 q11.21-q24.3 48549253 146024209 G
chr11 p15.5-p11.2 2121540 46490960 G
chr13 q12.11-q34 18556982 113766081 G
chr20 q11.21-q13.33 29436537 62320720 G
chrX p11.23-p11.1 48639378 57116899 G
chrX q11.1-q28 61980262 154561665 G
chrY p11.31-p11.2 2716461 8521949 L
chrY q11.21-q11.221 13208776 17558012 L

Chr: Chromosomes; Aber: Aberrations; G: Gain; L: Loss.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Common aberrations between the rectal tumor and the lung metastasis. The abnormalities are summarized by the colored bars (blue for the colon tumor and orange for the lung metastasis). The bar is to the right of the tracing when there is DNA gain and to the left of the tracing when there is DNA loss. The length of the bar delineates the area of the chromosome involved.

DISCUSSION

This case represents an atypical course for rectal cancer, with prolonged disease-free survival of about 19 years prior to the manifestation of disease recurrence in the form of metastatic disease to the lung.

Our aCGH results are consistent with other studies showing similar patterns of chromosomal imbalances in primary colorectal tumors and their corresponding pulmonary metastasis[11,12]. While we realize that aCGH analysis reveals the DNA copy number changes in tumor cells and not the exact origin of these cells, specific trends and patterns of genetic aberrations have been reported to be associated with specific tumor sites and types[10,13].

O’Connell et al[14] identified a recurrence risk score based on the expression of 12 genes (seven cancer-related genes and five reference genes). Six of the seven cancer-related genes were grouped into two biological pathways: cell cycle control (KI-67, C-MYC, MYBL2) and stromal response (BGN, FAP, INHBA), and the seventh gene (GADD45B) may regulate the activity of the stromal response genes. Interestingly, while we have not evaluated the expression of these genes in the primary rectal tumor or the recurrent lung metastatic lesion, we have noticed that most of those genes show copy number gains by aCGH in one or both lesions. Specifically, BGN (Xq28), FAP (2q24.2), C-MYC (8q24.21), and MYBL2 (20q13.12) have copy number gain in both the rectal and lung lesions; INHBA (7p14.1) has copy number gain in the rectal lesion; GADD45B (19p13.3) has copy number gain in the lung lesion; and KI-67 (10q26.2) has no changes in the copy number in either lesions.

Approximately 30% of patients with colorectal carcinoma who undergo primary curative surgical resection experience recurrent disease[15,16]. Several predictive factors for recurrence have been reported including: primary site (rectum vs colon), advanced stage, invasion of contiguous organs, and presence of perforation[16]. The most frequent sites of recurrence are liver and lungs (33% and 22%, respectively), with the majority of these recurrences occurring in the first two years after surgery[17]. In a retrospective study by Galandiuk et al[18], the median time to recurrence for patients who had undergone curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer was 16.7 mo. Likewise, another retrospective study by Obrand et al[17] reported an average time for distant recurrence of 22.9 mo.

It was established in the early 90’s that adjuvant therapy with fluorouracil and radiation in rectal cancer patients with locally invasive or regional nodal involvement reduces the risk of cancer recurrence and improves the overall survival[18]. More recently the German Rectal Cancer Trial established preoperative chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer showing a lower pelvic relapse rate (6% vs 13%) with no change in 10-years disease-free survival (68%) or overall survival (60%) compared to postoperative chemoradiation treatment[19]. Our patient was treated prior to the era of preoperative chemoradiation therapy and therefore received postoperative chemoradiation therapy. It would be difficult to determine whether the prolonged remission time in this case is due to the administration of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy or simply due to this patient’s unique tumor biology.

Late recurrence of colorectal cancer has been reported in small series. Recently, Ishii et al[21] reviewed 16 cases of colorectal cancer recurrence after a disease-free interval of 5 years or more. The median disease-free interval was 10 years with a range of 5-16 years. Shimoda et al[22] reported the longest recurrence interval in the literature of 16 years in a rectal cancer patient who had recurrent solitary metastatic ileal cancer. To our knowledge, the case we are reporting here represents the longest disease-free survival of 19 years in recurrent colorectal cancer after surgical resection.

The 5-years survival of patients with untreated metastatic disease is less than 5%[22]. Pulmonary metastasectomy in a select group of patients has a positive effect on survival (5-year survival rate of up to 50%)[23]. Accordingly, recurrent disease in this case was treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. Whether patients with metastasectomies should receive perioperative chemotherapy remains controversial[24].

This case identified striking similarities in genetic aberrations between a primary rectal tumor and its lung recurrence after long disease-free survival. Indeed, it reflects a lack of our full understanding of the tumor microenvironment. The mechanism responsible for recurrence following years of “dormancy” of the cancer cells deserves further investigation, in order to identify a subgroup of colorectal cancer patients that should be treated differently and, perhaps, should have prolonged surveillance. Focusing research efforts on outliers such as this case may help identify fundamental biological patterns that would also help in the treatment of more traditional patients.

COMMENTS

Case characteristics

An 81-years-old male with a history of resected rectal cancer presented with cough.

Clinical diagnosis

Dullness to percussion and decrease breath sounds over the upper lobe of the right lung.

Differential diagnosis

Lung mass, lung abscess, pneumonia.

Laboratory diagnosis

WBC 8.20 k/uL; HGB 12.10 gm/dL; CEA 1.20 ng/mL; metabolic panel and liver function test were within normal limits.

Imaging diagnosis

CT/PET scan showed right upper lobe mass (8.2 cm × 7.3 cm) with SUV of 14.5, and right-sided mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, in addition to a 1.2 cm nodule in the left costophrenic angle with no FDG activity.

Pathological diagnosis

Bronchoscopy and biopsy revealed a wild type K-ras adenocarcinoma of colonic primary, CDX2/CK20 positive and TTF1/CK7/CD58 negative.

Treatment

The patient was treated with FOLFOX (5-FU, oxaliplatin and leucovorin) in combination with bevacizumab.

Related reports

The tumor biology of colorectal cancer of is not very well understood and we do not have predictive biomarkers that indicate when a particular patient tumor will recur.

Term explanation

High-resolution array CGH is a molecular cytogenetic method that is used for analyzing DNA copy number aberrations which is applied to detect genomic abnormalities in cancer.

Experiences and lessons

This case report not only represents the longest rectal cancer disease-free interval in the literature, but also applies genetic analysis as a tool to confirm the similarity of the original and metastatic tumor and to predict the risk of recurrence.

Peer review

This article applies genetic analysis to confirm the origin of a recurrent rectal tumor and to predict the risk of recurrence.

Footnotes

Supported by Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States

P- Reviewer: Chetty R, Cardinale V, Wongkham S, Zoli W S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cunningham D, Atkin W, Lenz HJ, Lynch HT, Minsky B, Nordlinger B, Starling N. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:1030–1047. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60353-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kosinski L, Habr-Gama A, Ludwig K, Perez R. Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management: a review of contemporary primary rectal cancer treatment strategies. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:173–202. doi: 10.3322/caac.21138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beyond TME Collaborative. Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. Br J Surg. 2013;100:E1–33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9192_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wolmark N, Fisher B, Rockette H, Redmond C, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Jones J, Glass A, Lerner H, Lawrence W. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or BCG for colon cancer: results from NSABP protocol C-01. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80:30–36. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roth AD, Delorenzi M, Tejpar S, Yan P, Klingbiel D, Fiocca R, d’Ario G, Cisar L, Labianca R, Cunningham D, et al. Integrated analysis of molecular and clinical prognostic factors in stage II/III colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1635–1646. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, Yan P, Fiocca R, Klingbiel D, Dietrich D, Biesmans B, Bodoky G, Barone C, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:466–474. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones S, Chen WD, Parmigiani G, Diehl F, Beerenwinkel N, Antal T, Traulsen A, Nowak MA, Siegel C, Velculescu VE, et al. Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4283–4288. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712345105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wells A, Griffith L, Wells JZ, Taylor DP. The dormancy dilemma: quiescence versus balanced proliferation. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3811–3816. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vivanco Calderón F, Martín Duce A, Badía de Yébenes A, Domingo García P. [Risk factors in the closure of lateral colostomies] Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig. 1987;72:444–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Heim SMF. Cancer cytogenetics. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Danner BC, Gerdes JS, Jung K, Sander B, Enders C, Liersch T, Seipelt R, Gutenberg A, Gunawan B, Schöndube FA, et al. Comparison of chromosomal aberrations in primary colorectal carcinomas to their pulmonary metastases. Cancer Genet. 2011;204:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jiang JK, Chen YJ, Lin CH, Yu IT, Lin JK. Genetic changes and clonality relationship between primary colorectal cancers and their pulmonary metastases--an analysis by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;43:25–36. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.O’Connell MJ, Lavery I, Yothers G, Paik S, Clark-Langone KM, Lopatin M, Watson D, Baehner FL, Shak S, Baker J, et al. Relationship between tumor gene expression and recurrence in four independent studies of patients with stage II/III colon cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant fluorouracil plus leucovorin. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3937–3944. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.9538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Camps J, Grade M, Nguyen QT, Hörmann P, Becker S, Hummon AB, Rodriguez V, Chandrasekharappa S, Chen Y, Difilippantonio MJ, et al. Chromosomal breakpoints in primary colon cancer cluster at sites of structural variants in the genome. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1284–1295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O’Connell MJ, Campbell ME, Goldberg RM, Grothey A, Seitz JF, Benedetti JK, André T, Haller DG, Sargent DJ. Survival following recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT data set. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2336–2341. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Obrand DI, Gordon PH. Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:15–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02055676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Galandiuk S, Wieand HS, Moertel CG, Cha SS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.NIH consensus conference. Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. JAMA. 1990;264:1444–1450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, Becker H, Raab HR, Villanueva MT, Witzigmann H, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1926–1933. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ishii M, Chiba N, Ono D, Nakamura T, Ishikawa S, Arisawa Y, Hashimoto M. Lymph node metastasis from colon carcinoma at 11 years after the initial operation managed by lymph node resection and chemoradiation: A case report and a review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3:358–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.03.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shimoda M, Saitou M, Ueda N, Maeura Y, Matsunaga S, Okamoto S. A case of solitary metastatic ileal tumor occurred after 16 years from the resection of rectal carcinoma. J Clin Surg. 2002;57:549–552. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Simmonds PC. Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. BMJ. 2000;321:531–535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7260.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pfannschmidt J, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published series. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:324–338. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES