Abstract
Background
There is biological plausibility as to why infection with Helicobacter pylori, the leading cause of gastric cancer, may also increase the risk of colorectal cancer, but the epidemiological findings have been inconsistent. We assessed the association of H. pylori protein-specific infection and colorectal cancer risk in the prospective cohort, the Southern Community Cohort Study.
Methods
Multiplex serology was utilized to measure antibodies to 15 H. pylori proteins in pre-diagnostic blood among 188 incident colorectal cancer cases and 370 controls matched by age, race, sex, and blood collection timing. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Overall H. pylori prevalence was not associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.59–1.77). However, sero-positivity to any of five specific H. pylori proteins (VacA, HP231, HP305, NapA, HcpC) was associated with a significant 60 to 80% increase in odds of risk. These associations became even stronger when limited to colon cancer risk, particularly for the known H. pylori toxin VacA (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.22–4.11), including a significant, positive dose-response association by VacA antibody levels in quartiles (P<0.05). Associations with VacA sero-positivity were especially strong for early onset and late stage cancers.
Conclusions
The findings raise the hypothesis that individuals with high levels of antibodies to specific H. pylori proteins may be at higher risk of colon cancer.
Impact
Further investigation of the H. pylori – colorectal cancer association is warranted to determine the possibility of protein-specific antibody levels as a risk biomarker.
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, colorectal cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, VacA, CagA
INTRODUCTION
Infection with Helicobacter pylori, which induces chronic inflammation in the gastric mucosa, is the strongest known risk factor for gastric cancer. Recent studies suggest that H. pylori infection may also increase the risk of colorectal cancer, and although these findings have been inconsistent, two recent meta-analyses found significant 40% to 50% increased odds for colorectal cancer among individuals with evidence of a current or past H. pylori infection (1, 2). A primary mechanism by which H. pylori infection might increase the risk of colorectal cancer is via an increase in the release of gastrin (3), a peptide hormone whose main role is to stimulate gastric acid secretion, but which also functions as a mitogen (4). Chronic gastritis that results from persistent H. pylori infection is associated with hypergastrinemia, as H. pylori infection-related gastritis reduces acid secretion, which, in a negative feedback loop, induces the production of high gastrin levels (3). H. pylori infection could also increase risk of colorectal cancer through mechanisms related to those secondary to chronic infection and/or alteration of the bacterial flora that comprise the gastrointestinal microenvironment (4, 5, 6). Other evidence that colorectal and gastric cancers may share some aspects of a common etiology include the facts that: colorectal cancer has consistently been found to be the most common synchronous cancer among gastric cancer patients (7, 8); second primary gastric cancers are increased following colorectal cancer diagnosis (9); and, correspondingly, second primary colorectal cancers are increased following gastric cancer diagnosis (10).
The majority of the previously published studies examining the association between H. pylori and colorectal cancer risk did not take into account H. pylori strain type. As over 50% of the world’s population is infected with the bacteria, and only a small percentage of those individuals develop cancer, it is important that both host and bacterial factors are considered when assessing associations with disease. Furthermore, H. pylori has colonized the stomach of humans for over 50,000 years, and has evolved over time to become highly genetically diverse (11). While the authors of the most recent study of the association of H. pylori and colorectal cancer risk did stratify by presence of the H. pylori protein and known gastric cancer virulence factor cytotoxin-associated antigen (CagA), the association found with CagA-positive strains was not substantially stronger than that with H. pylori sero-prevalence alone (significant ORs of 1.20 and 1.18, respectively) (12). Additionally, this case-control study collected blood samples at hospitalization for cancer treatment, and thus the measurement of H. pylori status among cases may have been hindered by presence of the tumor and/or the initiation of cancer treatment. Finally, as the authors discuss themselves, they did not inspect the association of other H. pylori virulence factors, such as VacA, HcpC, and GroEL, with colorectal cancer risk. Only two other studies to our knowledge have investigated CagA status and colorectal cancer risk; in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Study cohort of Finnish male smokers, no association was found with H. pylori sero-positivity, and there was only a suggestion of an increase in risk for colorectal cancer among persons sero-positive to CagA (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.74–1.84) (13), while in a small hospital-based case-control study in Israel comprised of 67 cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma and 45 individuals hospitalized for transesophageal echocardiography as controls, CagA sero-positivity was linked to an over 10-fold increase in risk for colorectal cancer (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 2.7–41.3) (14).
Additionally, none of the published studies of H. pylori and colorectal cancer risk have included a substantial number of African Americans, the racial/ethnic group with the highest incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer in the United States (15). We recently found exceptionally high prevalence of H. pylori infection among African American participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS), comprised of individuals recruited from community health centers in the southeastern United States that serve primarily low-income and uninsured persons (16). In fact, both African Americans and whites in the SCCS have sero-prevalences that rival developing countries (89% and 69%, respectively), and African Americans are significantly more likely than whites to be infected with eight different H. pylori proteins suspected to be gastric cancer-associated virulence constituents, including CagA (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 4.5–9.1) and VacA (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5–3.5) (16).
The present study sought to assess the association of H. pylori and colorectal cancer risk by including H. pylori protein-specific analyses of the bacteria in a prospective, nested case-control design among an under-studied population with a high prevalence of H. pylori, the SCCS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Population
As previously described in detail (17), the SCCS is a prospective cohort study that enrolled approximately 86,000 men and women from 12 southeastern states from 2002 to 2009. Participants, aged 40 to 79, were primarily (86%) recruited from community health centers (CHCs), institutions offering basic health and preventative services mainly to the medically un- and under-insured, as well as by mail (14%). Individuals recruited from CHCs participated in in-person, comprehensive computer-assisted interviews that obtained information on demographic and lifestyle factors, as well as regular diet, personal and family medical history, and health services utilization. The SCCS was reviewed and approved by institutional review boards at Vanderbilt University and Meharry Medical College. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The individuals recruited by mail completed a paper version of the same baseline questionnaire. Individuals recruited at the CHCs were also asked to donate venous blood samples (20 mL) which were then immediately refrigerated. The samples were then shipped overnight to Vanderbilt University to be centrifuged the next day, and then stored at −80°C. For the assay of H. pylori protein antibodies as examined in the present project, a serum sample for each study subject was aliquoted into 50 μL portions.
Case identification
Incident colorectal cancer cases (International Classification of Diseases-Oncology [ICD-O-3] codes C180-189, C199, and C209) diagnosed after entry into the SCCS were identified through linkage with state cancer registries from the 12-state study area and/or from National Death Index mortality records. A total of 188 colorectal cancer cases were identified as occurring after biospecimen collection and before the end of 2011 among those SCCS participants recruited at CHCs who donated a blood sample.
Control selection
For each case, two controls were chosen, matched on age (+/− 2 years), race (African American, white, or other), sex, menopausal status (for women), CHC site, date of sample collection (+/− 6 months) and availability of serum. Matching with these criteria to identify two controls was successful for 87% of cases. For 10% of cases, the requirement for the control being recruited from the same CHC as the case was relaxed to a CHC in the same state, and for the remaining 3% of cases, the requirement for matching on CHC location was dropped altogether. Of the 376 controls chosen in this manner, three were excluded due to missing baseline data, one was missing serum, one was a duplicate, and one was not matched, resulting in 370 controls and 188 cases for the present study.
H. pylori multiplex serology
As previously described, H. pylori multiplex serology uses a glutathione S-transferase capture immunosorbent assay combined with fluorescent bead technology (Luminex) to detect antibody levels to a constellation of IgA, IgM, and IgG values to 15 H. pylori proteins (UreA, Catalase, GroEL, NapA, CagA, CAgM, Cagδ, HP0231, VacA, HpaA, Cad, HyuA, Omp, HcpC, and HP0305) (18, 19). These proteins were chosen for the assay based on known surface exposure and immunogenicity in 2-dimensional immunoblots (UreA, Catalase, NapA, CagA, HP231, VacA, and HpaA), serologic association with gastric cancer (GroEl, Cad, HyuA, Omp, and HcpC) and/or gastric ulcer (HP305 and CagM), and specific recognition in H. pylori-positive sera (Cagδ and CagM). All sera are analyzed once within a single assay day. Antigen-specific cut-off points were calculated (mean MFI plus three times standard deviation, excluding positive outliers) in 17 H. pylori negative sera previously classified for H. pylori status run within the same experiment. Defining H. pylori sero-positivity as reactivity with at least 4 proteins has shown good agreement (kappa=0.70) with commercial serological assay, resulting in 89% sensitivity and 82% specificity (18). For quality control, 18 samples from one pooled sample were included in the assay. The determination of sero-positivity for all of the H. pylori proteins was strongly consistent, and the inter-assay coefficients of variation ranged from 10–21% (notably, the CagA coefficient of variation was 13% and the VacA coefficient of variation was 15%).
Statistical analysis
To assess the individual associations of sero-positivity to each of the 15 H. pylori proteins with colorectal cancer risk, conditional logistic regression was used in separate models for each protein to determine ORs and 95% confidence intervals. To determine the possibility of confounding by baseline characteristics, Pearson’s chi-square test was used to assess differences between cases and controls, and between individuals sero-positive and sero-negative for H. pylori, and between individuals sero-positive and sero-negative for VacA. No baseline characteristic was found to be associated with both colorectal cancer risk and H. pylori or VacA status. Smoking status was the only baseline factor associated with colorectal cancer risk, but it was not associated with H. pylori or VacA status. Potential confounders associated with H. pylori or VacA status, including education, income, regular use of aspirin, vitamin supplement use, and colorectal cancer screening history were not associated with colorectal cancer risk in this population, and, like smoking status, inclusion of these variables in the model did not alter the main effects by 10% or more. Race was strongly associated with H. pylori status, but this demographic characteristic could not confound the association as controls were matched to cases by race, and conditional logistic regression ensured that the association between H. pylori and colorectal cancer compared risk among race-concordant sets.
To examine a potential dose-response relationship between level of antibodies and colorectal cancer risk, we created quartiles of antibody levels (MFI) for each of the 15 H. pylori proteins assessed based on the distribution among control subjects. Conditional logistic regression was used again to determine the association of increasing quartile of H. pylori protein-specific antibody level and colorectal cancer risk with indicator variables representing antibody levels, using the lowest quartile as the reference category. To test for a linear trend across antibody quartiles of each protein, a continuous variable was created with the values of 0, 1, 2, and 3 for the four quartiles. Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was considered but rejected as the 15 H. pylori proteins assessed are significantly correlated with one another.
To further explore the relationship between H. pylori status and risk of colorectal cancer, we assessed the association in separate models for colon cancer (C180-189) and rectal cancer (C199, C209), for cancer of the right/ascending colon (C180-184) and cancer of the left/descending colon (C-185-187), for cancers diagnosed at local, regional, and distant stages, individually, and for cancers by age at diagnosis (separately, in tertiles and dichotomously comparing <60 to 60+ years old). For these models we again performed conditional logistic regression, and for analyses by stage adjusted for a marker of socio-economic status (high school graduate, yes v. no) and for a history of colorectal cancer screening (ever v. never). We examined effect modification of the association of H. pylori status and colon cancer risk through models stratified by race and sex, and assessment of an interaction term using the likelihood ratio test.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics of colorectal cancer cases and controls were similar in most respects, including markers of socio-economic status and body mass index (Table 1). While the great majority of individuals in this population (87.1%) were sero-positive for H. pylori (i.e., were positive to at least 4 of the proteins), individuals sero-negative for H. pylori were significantly more likely to be white (rather than African American), have obtained a high school or greater education, have a household annual income above $15,000, be a regular aspirin user, and use vitamin supplements. The same proportion of colorectal cancer cases and controls – 87% – were sero-positive to H. pylori overall, leading to no difference in risk (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.59–1.77).
Table 1.
Controls (N=370) | Colorectal cancer cases (N=188) | H. pylori− (N=72) | H. pylori+ (N=486) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
Age, years | ||||||||
40–49 | 96 | 26.0 | 45 | 23.9 | 22 | 30.6 | 119 | 24.5 |
50–59 | 152 | 41.1 | 79 | 42.0 | 27 | 37.5 | 204 | 42.0 |
60–79 | 122 | 33.0 | 64 | 34.0 | 23 | 31.9 | 163 | 33.5 |
Race † | ||||||||
African American | 288 | 77.8 | 145 | 77.1 | 35 | 48.6 | 398 | 81.9 |
White | 69 | 18.7 | 36 | 19.2 | 34 | 47.2 | 71 | 14.6 |
Other | 13 | 3.5 | 7 | 3.7 | 3 | 4.2 | 17 | 3.5 |
Sex | ||||||||
Male | 167 | 45.1 | 86 | 45.7 | 33 | 45.8 | 220 | 45.3 |
Female | 203 | 54.9 | 102 | 54.3 | 39 | 54.2 | 266 | 54.7 |
Marital status | ||||||||
Married | 127 | 35.1 | 52 | 28.1 | 24 | 35.3 | 155 | 32.4 |
Separated/Divorced | 133 | 36.7 | 64 | 34.6 | 25 | 36.8 | 172 | 35.9 |
Widowed | 42 | 11.6 | 31 | 16.8 | 8 | 11.8 | 65 | 13.6 |
Single/Never married | 60 | 16.6 | 38 | 20.5 | 11 | 16.2 | 87 | 18.2 |
Education † | ||||||||
<High school | 143 | 39.5 | 80 | 43.2 | 18 | 26.5 | 205 | 42.8 |
High school | 137 | 37.9 | 67 | 36.2 | 22 | 32.4 | 182 | 38.0 |
>High school | 82 | 22.7 | 38 | 20.5 | 28 | 41.2 | 92 | 19.2 |
Household income † | ||||||||
<$15,000 | 225 | 62.7 | 121 | 66.5 | 34 | 50.0 | 312 | 66.0 |
$15,000 – <$25,000 | 84 | 23.4 | 38 | 20.9 | 18 | 26.5 | 104 | 22.0 |
$25,000 – <$50,000 | 37 | 10.3 | 18 | 9.9 | 11 | 16.2 | 44 | 9.3 |
≥$50,000 | 13 | 3.6 | 5 | 2.8 | 5 | 7.4 | 13 | 2.8 |
Smoking status* | ||||||||
Current smoker | 150 | 41.4 | 57 | 30.8 | 24 | 35.3 | 183 | 38.2 |
Former smoker | 110 | 30.4 | 60 | 32.4 | 24 | 35.3 | 146 | 30.5 |
Never smoker | 102 | 28.2 | 68 | 36.8 | 20 | 29.4 | 150 | 31.3 |
Body mass index | ||||||||
18.3 – 24.9 | 91 | 25.2 | 36 | 20.0 | 15 | 22.7 | 112 | 23.6 |
25.0 – 29.9 | 102 | 28.3 | 64 | 35.6 | 21 | 31.8 | 145 | 30.5 |
≥30.0 | 168 | 46.5 | 80 | 44.4 | 30 | 45.5 | 218 | 45.9 |
Medical conditions | ||||||||
Hypertension | 222 | 61.7 | 110 | 59.5 | 40 | 58.8 | 292 | 61.2 |
Diabetes | 100 | 27.7 | 65 | 35.1 | 18 | 26.5 | 147 | 30.8 |
High cholesterol † | 129 | 35.8 | 70 | 38.3 | 35 | 51.5 | 164 | 34.5 |
COPD | 37 | 10.3 | 27 | 14.6 | 10 | 14.7 | 54 | 11.3 |
Asthma | 37 | 10.3 | 23 | 12.4 | 9 | 13.2 | 51 | 10.7 |
Allergies | 80 | 22.2 | 41 | 22.2 | 17 | 25.0 | 104 | 21.8 |
Colorectal polyps | 21 | 5.8 | 12 | 6.5 | 6 | 8.8 | 27 | 5.7 |
Heartburn/reflux | 90 | 25.0 | 44 | 23.8 | 20 | 29.4 | 114 | 23.9 |
Ulcer | 61 | 16.9 | 33 | 17.9 | 11 | 16.2 | 83 | 17.4 |
Family history of: | ||||||||
Colorectal cancer | 21 | 5.6 | 16 | 8.5 | 3 | 4.2 | 34 | 7.0 |
Gastric cancer | 12 | 3.2 | 11 | 5.9 | 3 | 4.2 | 20 | 4.1 |
Regular use of: | ||||||||
Aspirin † | 123 | 34.2 | 72 | 38.9 | 33 | 49.3 | 162 | 33.9 |
Acetaminophen | 48 | 13.3 | 27 | 14.6 | 10 | 14.7 | 65 | 13.6 |
Have insurance | ||||||||
No | 141 | 39.2 | 76 | 41.3 | 26 | 38.8 | 191 | 40.0 |
Yes | 219 | 60.8 | 108 | 58.7 | 41 | 61.2 | 286 | 60.0 |
Ever CRC screeninga | ||||||||
No | 242 | 68.0 | 135 | 74.2 | 40 | 61.5 | 337 | 71.3 |
Yes | 114 | 32.0 | 47 | 25.8 | 25 | 38.5 | 136 | 28.8 |
Fruit & veg intake, times/day | ||||||||
0–2 | 151 | 41.9 | 67 | 36.4 | 30 | 44.8 | 188 | 39.4 |
3–4 | 144 | 40.0 | 82 | 44.6 | 27 | 40.3 | 199 | 41.7 |
5+ | 65 | 18.1 | 35 | 19.0 | 10 | 14.9 | 90 | 18.9 |
Meat intake, times/day | ||||||||
0 | 22 | 6.1 | 16 | 8.7 | 7 | 10.5 | 31 | 6.5 |
1–2 | 256 | 71.1 | 129 | 70.1 | 51 | 76.1 | 334 | 70.0 |
3+ | 82 | 22.8 | 39 | 21.2 | 9 | 13.4 | 112 | 23.5 |
Alcohol, drinks per day | ||||||||
None | 176 | 49.3 | 98 | 53.6 | 31 | 46.3 | 243 | 51.4 |
1–2 | 127 | 35.6 | 62 | 33.9 | 29 | 43.3 | 160 | 33.8 |
3+ | 54 | 15.1 | 23 | 12.6 | 7 | 10.5 | 70 | 14.8 |
Vitamin supplement use † | ||||||||
No | 211 | 58.9 | 107 | 58.2 | 29 | 43.3 | 289 | 60.8 |
Yes | 147 | 41.1 | 77 | 41.9 | 38 | 56.7 | 186 | 39.2 |
P<0.05 comparing colorectal cancer cases and controls
P<0.05 comparing individuals by H. pylori status
defined as ever had a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy (standard screening vs. diagnostic screening not distinguishable)
Sero-positivity to five of the 15 H. pylori proteins investigated – VacA, HP231, HP305, NapA, and HcpC – was associated with a statistically significant 60 to 80% increase in odds of colorectal cancer risk (Table 2). The association of sero-positivity to 9 of the other 10 H. pylori proteins were also in the direction of increased risk, the one exception being CagA (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.64–1.53). When examining the associations with colon cancer alone, the association of these five proteins became even stronger, resulting most significantly in an over 2-fold increase in risk for individuals sero-positive to VacA (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.22–4.11). The association between CagA sero-positivity and colon cancer moved in the positive direction, although it did not reach statistical significance (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.74–2.16). Overall H. pylori sero-positivity was associated with a non-significant increase in risk for colon cancer (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.74–2.93). No associations were found between overall H. pylori sero-positivity or sero-positivity to specific H. pylori proteins and rectal cancer risk. Analyses separating cancers of the right colon from those of the left colon revealed that the associations with sero-positivity to individual proteins seemed stronger for right-sided tumors than left-sided tumors (Supplementary Table S1). The association of overall H. pylori sero-positivity became stronger, and close to significance, for cancers of the right colon only (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 0.94–7.05; P = 0.06).
Table 2.
Risk of colorectal cancer | Risk of colon cancer | Risk of rectal cancer | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
Controls n (%) | Cases n (%) | Conditional OR (95% CI) | Controls n (%) | Cases n (%) | Conditional OR (95% CI) | Controls n (%) | Cases n (%) | Conditional OR (95% CI) | |
VacA− | 117 (31.6) | 41 (21.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | 78 (30.1) | 25 (18.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 33 (36.3) | 13 (28.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
VacA+ | 253 (68.4) | 147 (78.2) | 1.84 (1.17, 2.89) | 181 (69.9) | 107 (81.1) | 2.24 (1.22, 4.11) | 58 (63.7) | 33 (71.7) | 1.46 (0.66, 3.22) |
HP231− | 129 (34.9) | 46 (24.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 94 (36.3) | 32 (24.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 30 (33.0) | 12 (26.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
HP231+ | 241 (65.1) | 142 (75.5) | 1.74 (1.14, 2.66) | 165 (63.7) | 100 (75.8) | 1.90 (1.15, 3.14) | 61 (67.0) | 34 (73.9) | 1.45 (0.61, 3.43) |
HP305− | 172 (46.5) | 66 (35.1) | 1.00 (Reference) | 120 (46.3) | 47 (35.6) | 1.00 (Reference) | 41 (45.1) | 16 (34.8) | 1.00 (Reference) |
HP305+ | 198 (53.5) | 122 (64.9) | 1.63 (1.13, 2.35) | 139 (53.7) | 85 (64.4) | 1.61 (1.04, 2.50) | 50 (55.0) | 30 (65.2) | 1.52 (0.72, 3.22) |
NapA− | 117 (31.6) | 42 (22.3) | 1.00 (Reference) | 81 (31.3) | 29 (22.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 29 (31.9) | 11 (23.9) | 1.00 (Reference) |
NapA+ | 253 (68.4) | 146 (77.7) | 1.67 (1.10, 2.53) | 178 (68.7) | 103 (78.0) | 1.68 (1.03, 2.75) | 62 (68.1) | 35 (76.1) | 1.50 (0.65, 3.47) |
HcpC− | 229 (61.9) | 96 (51.1) | 1.00 (Reference) | 156 (60.2) | 62 (47.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 60 (65.9) | 28 (60.9) | 1.00 (Reference) |
HcpC+ | 141 (38.1) | 92 (48.9) | 1.66 (1.13, 2.43) | 103 (39.8) | 70 (53.0) | 1.89 (1.19, 2.99) | 31 (34.1) | 18 (39.1) | 1.23 (0.57, 2.66) |
Cad− | 227 (61.4) | 102 (54.3) | 1.00 (Reference) | 157 (60.6) | 71 (53.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | 61 (67.0) | 25 (54.4) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Cad+ | 143 (38.7) | 86 (45.7) | 1.34 (0.94, 1.92) | 102 (39.4) | 61 (46.2) | 1.34 (0.87, 2.07) | 30 (33.0) | 21 (45.7) | 1.64 (0.81, 3.35) |
HpaA− | 188 (50.8) | 83 (44.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 132 (51.0) | 58 (43.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 49 (53.9) | 22 (47.8) | 1.00 (Reference) |
HpaA+ | 182 (49.2) | 105 (55.9) | 1.33 (0.93, 1.92) | 127 (49.0) | 74 (56.1) | 1.36 (0.88, 2.11) | 42 (46.2) | 24 (52.2) | 1.26 (0.61, 2.64) |
Omp− | 114 (30.8) | 48 (25.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 76 (29.3) | 30 (22.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 31 (34.1) | 15 (32.6) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Omp+ | 256 (69.2) | 140 (74.5) | 1.34 (0.88, 2.03) | 183 (70.7) | 102 (77.3) | 1.49 (0.90, 2.49) | 60 (65.9) | 31 (67.4) | 1.05 (0.49, 2.28) |
UreA− | 211 (57.0) | 96 (51.1) | 1.00 (Reference) | 148 (57.1) | 65 (49.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 52 (57.1) | 25 (54.4) | 1.00 (Reference) |
UreA+ | 159 (43.0) | 92 (48.9) | 1.28 (0.90, 1.82) | 111 (42.9) | 67 (50.8) | 1.39 (0.92, 2.12) | 39 (42.9) | 21 (45.7) | 1.10 (0.53, 2.26) |
Cagδ− | 184 (49.7) | 85 (45.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 132 (51.0) | 57 (43.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 47 (51.7) | 23 (50.0) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Cagδ+ | 186 (50.3) | 103 (54.8) | 1.18 (0.83, 1.68) | 127 (49.0) | 75 (56.8) | 1.35 (0.88, 2.07) | 44 (48.4) | 23 (50.0) | 1.04 (0.52, 2.11) |
CagM− | 143 (38.7) | 67 (35.6) | 1.00 (Reference) | 101 (39.0) | 46 (34.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 34 (37.4) | 18 (39.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
CagM+ | 227 (61.4) | 121 (64.4) | 1.18 (0.79, 1.74) | 158 (61.0) | 86 (65.2) | 1.26 (0.78, 2.04) | 57 (62.6) | 28 (60.9) | 0.93 (0.44, 1.96) |
HyuA− | 199 (53.8) | 98 (52.1) | 1.00 (Reference) | 139 (53.7) | 72 (54.6) | 1.00 (Reference) | 47 (51.7) | 22 (47.8) | 1.00 (Reference) |
HyuA+ | 171 (46.2) | 90 (47.9) | 1.07 (0.76, 1.52) | 120 (46.3) | 60 (45.5) | 0.97 (0.64, 1.47) | 44 (48.4) | 24 (52.2) | 1.18 (0.56, 2.50) |
GroEL− | 79 (21.4) | 38 (20.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 52 (20.1) | 25 (18.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 22 (24.2) | 12 (26.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
GroEL+ | 291 (78.7) | 150 (79.8) | 1.08 (0.69.1.70) | 207 (79.9) | 107 (81.1) | 1.10 (0.63.1.92) | 69 (75.8) | 34 (73.9) | 0.89 (0.39, 2.02) |
Catalase− | 178 (48.1) | 89 (47.3) | 1.00 (Reference) | 133 (51.4) | 57 (43.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 37 (40.7) | 26 (56.5) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Catalase+ | 192 (51.9) | 99 (52.7) | 1.05 (0.73, 1.51) | 126 (48.7) | 75 (56.8) | 1.43 (0.93, 2.22) | 54 (59.3) | 20 (43.5) | 0.51 (0.24, 1.10) |
CagA− | 115 (31.1) | 59 (31.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 81 (31.3) | 37 (28.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 28 (30.8) | 20 (43.5) | 1.00 (Reference) |
CagA+ | 255 (68.9) | 129 (68.6) | 0.99 (0.64, 1.53) | 178 (68.7) | 95 (72.0) | 1.26 (0.74, 2.16) | 63 (69.2) | 26 (56.5) | 0.47 (0.20, 1.12) |
Results are from a conditional logistic regression model, among cases and controls matched on age, race, sex, menopausal status (for women), CHC site, date of sample collection, and availability of serum, assessing the association of sero-positivity to each H. pylori protein, in separate models, with odds of incident colorectal cancer.
NOTE: Bold indicates statistically significant at P < 0.05.
When examining the association of VacA-positive H. pylori sero-prevalence with colorectal cancer in separate models by stage, we found no associations with local cancer (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.48–2.37)or regional cancer (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 0.88–4.92), but significant excess risk with distant colorectal cancer (OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 1.51–21.37). Similarly, when comparing the association of VacA-positive H. pylori sero-prevalence by age at diagnosis, significance was found only for those at the youngest end of the spectrum (diagnosed at <55 years old) (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.45–8.38), and the association diminished as age at diagnosis increased to 55–64 years old (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.69–2.93) and 65 years or older (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.60–2.97). Stratification by race and sex in separate models did not reveal effect modification by these factors (data not shown).
A significant positive dose-response association by quartile of antibodies for risk of colorectal cancer was found for 7 of the 15 H. pylori proteins assessed (VacA, HP231, HP305, NapA, HcpC, Cad, and GroEL) (Table 3). When examining these trends with colon cancer only, the dose-response trends for each of these 7 H. pylori proteins were strengthened (although statistical significance was lessened, due to smaller numbers), statistical significance in trend was reached for an additional protein (UreA), and a suggestion of a dose-response association was found for CagA (P for trend = 0.06). No dose-response associations between antibodies to H. pylori proteins and risk of rectal cancer were found.
Table 3.
Risk of colorectal cancer | Risk of colon cancer | Risk of rectal cancer | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
Antibody level (MFI) | Controls n (%) | Cases n (%) | Conditional OR (95% CI) | Controls n (%) | Cases n (%) | Conditional OR (95% CI) | Controls n (%) | Cases n (%) | Conditional OR (95% CI) |
VacA | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 33 (17.6) | 1.00 (Reference) | 61 (23.6) | 19 (14.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 28 (30.8) | 12 (26.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 49 (26.1) | 1.63 (0.93, 2.85) | 67 (25.9) | 37 (28.0) | 2.21 (1.04, 4.70) | 22 (24.2) | 9 (19.6) | 0.93 (0.34, 2.55) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 52 (27.7) | 1.82 (1.02, 3.25) | 66 (25.5) | 39 (29.6) | 2.53 (1.17, 5.50) | 18 (19.8) | 10 (21.7) | 1.43 (0.50, 4.08) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 54 (28.7) | 1.96 (1.07, 3.57) | 65 (25.1) | 37 (28.0) | 2.53 (1.13, 5.69) | 23 (25.3) | 15 (32.6) | 1.74 (0.60, 5.00) |
P trend | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.29 | ||||||
HP231 | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 30 (16.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 68 (26.3) | 20 (15.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 20 (22.0) | 8 (17.4) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 39 (20.7) | 1.31 (0.75, 2.30) | 65 (25.1) | 26 (19.7) | 1.38 (0.70, 2.73) | 22 (24.2) | 12 (26.1) | 1.32 (0.44, 3.92) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 57 (30.3) | 2.02 (1.17, 3.49) | 55 (21.2) | 41 (31.1) | 2.70 (1.39, 5.25) | 31 (34.1) | 12 (26.1) | 0.95 (0.32, 2.84) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 62 (33.0) | 2.17 (1.28, 3.70) | 71 (27.4) | 45 (34.1) | 2.27 (1.20, 4.27) | 18 (19.8) | 14 (30.4) | 1.83 (0.61, 5.45) |
P trend | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.36 | ||||||
HP305 | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 32 (17.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 67 (25.9) | 23 (17.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 21 (23.1) | 9 (19.6) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 38 (20.2) | 1.20 (0.68, 2.12) | 63 (24.3) | 28 (21.2) | 1.30 (0.67, 2.54) | 21 (23.1) | 7 (15.2) | 0.78 (0.25, 2.47) |
Q3 | 94 (25.4) | 57 (30.3) | 1.76 (1.05, 2.94) | 66 (25.5) | 36 (27.3) | 1.61 (0.86, 3.00) | 26 (28.6) | 17 (37.0) | 1.47 (0.56, 3.86) |
Q4 | 91 (24.6) | 61 (32.5) | 2.11 (1.22, 3.65) | 63 (24.3) | 45 (34.1) | 2.31 (1.21, 4.41) | 23 (25.3) | 13 (28.3) | 1.40 (0.44, 4.45) |
P trend | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.37 | ||||||
NapA | |||||||||
Q1 | 96 (26.0) | 39 (20.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 65 (25.1) | 28 (21.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 24 (26.4) | 10 (21.7) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 89 (24.1) | 37 (19.7) | 1.07 (0.62, 1.85) | 70 (27.0) | 25 (18.9) | 0.88 (0.46, 1.68) | 16 (17.6) | 9 (19.6) | 1.41 (0.41, 4.89) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 55 (29.3) | 1.48 (0.89, 2.46) | 68 (26.3) | 43 (32.6) | 1.51 (0.84, 2.71) | 22 (24.2) | 9 (19.6) | 0.97 (0.32, 2.94) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 57 (30.3) | 1.59 (0.95, 2.64) | 56 (21.6) | 36 (27.3) | 1.57 (0.84, 2.96) | 29 (31.9) | 18 (39.1) | 1.47 (0.57, 3.79) |
P trend | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.53 | ||||||
HcpC | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 41 (21.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | 65 (25.1) | 26 (19.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 24 (26.4) | 12 (26.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 36 (19.2) | 0.91 (0.52, 1.58) | 66 (25.5) | 22 (16.7) | 0.87 (0.44, 1.73) | 19 (20.9) | 12 (26.1) | 1.24 (0.44, 3.54) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 52 (27.7) | 1.36 (0.80, 2.30) | 61 (23.6) | 40 (30.3) | 1.88 (0.98, 3.61) | 29 (31.9) | 10 (21.7) | 0.68 (0.24, 1.93) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 59 (31.4) | 1.52 (0.90, 2.55) | 67 (25.9) | 44 (33.3) | 1.84 (0.97, 3.51) | 19 (20.9) | 12 (26.1) | 1.16 (0.42, 3.21) |
P trend | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.96 | ||||||
Cad | |||||||||
Q1 | 95 (25.7) | 41 (21.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | 69 (26.6) | 31 (23.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 23 (25.3) | 8 (17.4) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 91 (24.6) | 45 (23.9) | 1.12 (0.67. 1.86) | 64 (24.7) | 29 (22.0) | 0.95 (0.51, 1.75) | 24 (26.4) | 13 (28.3) | 1.62 (0.55, 4.78) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 31 (16.5) | 0.74 (0.42, 1.30) | 65 (25.1) | 20 (15.2) | 0.66 (0.34, 1.31) | 21 (23.1) | 9 (19.6) | 1.18 (0.38, 3.67) |
Q4 | 91 (24.6) | 71 (37.8) | 1.71 (1.07, 2.72) | 61 (23.6) | 52 (39.4) | 1.77 (1.02, 3.05) | 23 (25.3) | 16 (34.8) | 1.99 (0.70, 5.61) |
P trend | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.28 | ||||||
HpaA | |||||||||
Q1 | 94 (25.4) | 33 (17.6) | 1.00 (Reference) | 67 (25.9) | 21 (15.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 25 (27.5) | 9 (19.6) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 91 (24.6) | 49 (26.1) | 1.56 (0.92, 2.64) | 63 (24.3) | 37 (28.0) | 1.95 (1.02, 3.73) | 23 (25.3) | 12 (26.1) | 1.40 (0.50, 3.90) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 54 (28.7) | 1.71 (1.01, 2.90) | 59 (22.8) | 41 (31.1) | 2.39 (1.23, 4.64) | 24 (26.4) | 11 (23.9) | 1.28 (0.46, 3.53) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 52 (27.7) | 1.66 (0.97, 2.86) | 70 (27.0) | 33 (25.0) | 1.62 (0.83, 3.18) | 19 (20.9) | 14 (30.4) | 1.98 (0.69, 5.66) |
P trend | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.25 | ||||||
Omp | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 40 (21.3) | 1.00 (Reference) | 61 (23.6) | 25 (18.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 26 (28.6) | 13 (28.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 45 (23.9) | 1.17 (0.70, 1.97) | 66 (25.5) | 31 (23.5) | 1.20 (0.63, 2.29) | 22 (24.2) | 11 (23.9) | 0.97 (0.38, 2.50) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 47 (25.0) | 1.24 (0.73, 2.10) | 66 (25.5) | 36 (27.3) | 1.40 (0.74, 2.63) | 23 (25.3) | 9 (19.6) | 0.78 (0.26, 2.30) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 56 (29.8) | 1.53 (0.89, 2.63) | 66 (25.5) | 40 (30.3) | 1.60 (0.84, 3.06) | 20 (22.0) | 13 (28.3) | 1.43 (0.44, 4.68) |
P trend | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.75 | ||||||
UreA | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 37 (19.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 74 (28.6) | 25 (18.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 16 (17.6) | 10 (21.7) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 47 (25.0) | 1.27 (0.75, 2.13) | 56 (21.6) | 32 (24.2) | 1.67 (0.88, 3.17) | 29 (31.9) | 11 (23.9) | 0.64 (0.23, 1.77) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 40 (21.3) | 1.06 (0.61, 1.82) | 70 (27.0) | 29 (22.0) | 1.17 (0.61, 2.23) | 20 (22.0) | 10 (21.7) | 0.75 (0.25, 2.33) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 64 (34.0) | 1.77 (1.06, 2.95) | 59 (22.8) | 46 (34.9) | 2.38 (1.29, 4.39) | 26 (28.6) | 15 (32.6) | 0.91 (0.32, 2.64) |
P trend | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.89 | ||||||
Cagδ | |||||||||
Q1 | 94 (25.4) | 47 (25.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 72 (27.8) | 32 (24.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 20 (22.0) | 12 (26.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 38 (20.2) | 0.80 (0.47, 1.35) | 62 (23.9) | 25 (18.9) | 0.88 (0.48, 1.63) | 27 (29.7) | 11 (23.9) | 0.60 (0.19, 1.85) |
Q3 | 92 (24.9) | 43 (22.9) | 0.93 (0.56, 1.53) | 57 (22.0) | 32 (24.2) | 1.27 (0.70, 2.30) | 28 (30.8) | 8 (17.4) | 0.44 (0.15, 1.31) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 60 (31.9) | 1.29 (0.80, 2.08) | 68 (26.3) | 43 (32.6) | 1.41 (0.81, 2.48) | 16 (17.6) | 15 (32.6) | 1.63 (0.56, 4.81) |
P trend | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.57 | ||||||
CagM | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 44 (23.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 69 (26.6) | 30 (22.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 20 (22.0) | 11 (23.9) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 40 (21.3) | 0.94 (0.56, 1.58) | 61 (23.6) | 28 (21.2) | 1.08 (0.58, 2.01) | 24 (26.4) | 11 (23.9) | 0.79 (0.26, 2.40) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 48 (25.5) | 1.12 (0.66, 1.90) | 66 (25.5) | 36 (27.3) | 1.31 (0.70, 2.45) | 23 (25.3) | 11 (23.9) | 0.85 (0.29, 2.46) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 56 (29.8) | 1.32 (0.79, 2.20) | 63 (24.3) | 38 (28.8) | 1.45 (0.78, 2.68) | 24 (26.4) | 13 (28.3) | 0.94 (0.32, 2.71) |
P trend | 0.21 | 0.20 | 1.00 | ||||||
HyuA | |||||||||
Q1 | 94 (25.4) | 39 (20.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 66 (25.5) | 29 (22.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | 21 (23.1) | 9 (19.6) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 51 (27.1) | 1.36 (0.82, 2.25) | 65 (25.1) | 36 (27.3) | 1.28 (0.70, 2.34) | 22 (24.2) | 13 (28.3) | 1.33 (0.46, 3.82) |
Q3 | 92 (24.9) | 46 (24.5) | 1.24 (0.74, 2.08) | 67 (25.9) | 31 (23.5) | 1.09 (0.59, 2.00) | 22 (24.2) | 13 (28.3) | 1.34 (0.45, 3.99) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 52 (27.7) | 1.39 (0.83, 2.32) | 61 (23.6) | 36 (27.3) | 1.36 (0.75, 2.47) | 26 (28.6) | 11 (23.9) | 1.00 (0.31, 3.28) |
P trend | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.93 | ||||||
GroEL | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 44 (23.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | 63 (24.3) | 30 (22.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 25 (27.5) | 13 (28.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 27 (14.4) | 0.64 (0.36, 1.14) | 67 (25.9) | 17 (12.9) | 0.54 (0.26, 1.10) | 19 (20.9) | 7 (15.2) | 0.69 (0.23, 2.11) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 48 (25.5) | 1.09 (0.64, 1.83) | 59 (22.8) | 33 (25.0) | 1.17 (0.63, 2.20) | 29 (31.9) | 10 (21.7) | 0.60 (0.21, 1.74) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 69 (36.7) | 1.69 (1.02, 2.82) | 70 (27.0) | 52 (39.4) | 1.67 (0.92, 3.04) | 18 (19.8) | 16 (34.8) | 1.71 (0.61, 4.74) |
P trend | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.37 | ||||||
Catalase | |||||||||
Q1 | 94 (25.4) | 45 (23.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | 69 (26.6) | 30 (22.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 19 (20.9) | 13 (28.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 91 (24.6) | 48 (25.5) | 1.12 (0.68, 1.83) | 70 (27.0) | 31 (23.5) | 1.04 (0.57, 1.90) | 19 (20.9) | 13 (28.3) | 1.03 (0.40, 2.69) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 45 (23.9) | 1.03 (0.61, 1.73) | 58 (22.4) | 33 (25.0) | 1.34 (0.73, 2.46) | 28 (30.8) | 10 (21.7) | 0.49 (0.16, 1.45) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 50 (26.6) | 1.16 (0.70, 1.93) | 62 (23.9) | 38 (28.8) | 1.47 (0.80, 2.69) | 25 (27.5) | 10 (21.7) | 0.62 (0.22, 1.72) |
P trend | 0.64 | 0.15 | 0.20 | ||||||
CagA | |||||||||
Q1 | 93 (25.1) | 46 (24.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 68 (26.3) | 28 (21.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | 21 (23.1) | 17 (37.0) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Q2 | 92 (24.9) | 40 (21.3) | 0.91 (0.53, 1.58) | 64 (24.7) | 29 (22.0) | 1.25 (0.63, 2.44) | 26 (28.6) | 7 (15.2) | 0.30 (0.10, 0.94) |
Q3 | 93 (25.1) | 51 (27.1) | 1.14 (0.66, 1.95) | 66 (25.5) | 35 (26.5) | 1.46 (0.75, 2.87) | 21 (23.1) | 13 (28.3) | 0.65 (0.23, 1.83) |
Q4 | 92 (24.9) | 51 (27.1) | 1.19 (0.68, 2.07) | 61 (23.6) | 40 (30.3) | 1.87 (0.95, 3.67) | 23 (25.3) | 9 (19.6) | 0.42 (0.13, 1.34) |
P trend | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.23 |
Results are from a conditional logistic regression model, among cases and controls matched on age, race, sex, menopausal status (for women), CHC site, date of sample collection, and availability of serum, assessing the association of sero-positivity to each H. pylori protein, in separate models, with odds of incident colorectal cancer.
NOTE: Bold indicates statistically significant at P< 0.05.
DISCUSSION
In this prospective study of a predominantly low-income population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection, sero-positivity to five H. pylori specific-proteins, most notably VacA, was associated with a 60–80% increase in risk of colorectal cancer, and this risk increased with increasing quartile of protein-specific antibody levels. The dose-response association of VacA antibody levels was particularly strong with late stage and early onset colon cancers. There was no significant association with overall H. pylori sero-prevalence or for rectal cancer separately.
VacA is a multi-functional toxin that targets the mitochondria through the formation of pores in the epithelial cell membrane, entering host cells through vacuoles in the cytoplasm, where it induces apoptosis as well as blocks T-cell proliferation and induces cell-cycle arrest (20). In vivo experiments have found that expression of VacA plays an important role in the colonization of the host (21). While most strains of H. pylori possess the vacA gene and express the associated protein, less than half produce the most active form (22). The association of increased levels of antibodies to VacA with colorectal cancer risk may be related to gastrin, a peptide hormone that induces gastric acid secretion and stimulates protein expression of COX-2 (23). Laboratory studies have found that administration of VacA-positive strains of H. pylori (as well as CagA-positive H. pylori strains) induces an inflammatory response and increases gastrinemia (24, 25, 26), and that after H. pylori eradication, serum gastrin levels decrease significantly (27). An association between high gastrin levels and colorectal cancer risk has been suggested in several studies of human populations (28, 29, 30), although the association only reached significance in one (30). In the most recent study of the gastrin – colorectal cancer association, mean levels of gastrin did not differ between cases and controls, although significantly higher levels were seen among patients with lymph node metastasis compared to patients without (P = 0.03) (29).
With the exception of the present study, no other studies to our knowledge have examined colorectal cancer risk with H. pylori sub-types other than CagA-positive strains. In regards to gastric cancer, serum antibodies to both CagA and VacA have been found to be associated with increased risk of disease as well as a stronger inflammatory response (31). Some studies have even found stronger associations for gastrointestinal disease among individuals with VacA antibodies than among those with CagA antibodies (32, 33, 34). However, overall, the findings for the association of VacA antibodies and gastrointestinal pathology are inconsistent, with studies that find positive associations with disease (32, 34, 35) and those that find null associations (31, 36).
While in the current study we found a null association of CagA with colorectal cancer risk, the association of colon cancer risk with CagA-positive strains (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.74–2.16) is similar to what has been seen in other studies, although it did not reach significance in our analysis. It is possible that differences in risk associated with CagA-positive H. pylori might emerge if one could differentiate CagA isoforms (i.e., phylo-geographic origin of the strain and/or EPIYA-motifs) as has been done in studies of gastric cancer (37, 38, 39), although this requires the use of gastric specimens, rather than blood samples that are collected in most prospective studies. Additionally, the present study found no evidence of an interaction by VacA and CagA strain (data not shown), whereby a VacA-CagA interaction has been suggested in gastric cancer etiology (40).
In the present study, the strongest associations with increased level of VacA antibodies were found for colon cancer and specifically cancer of the right colon, as well as for colon cancer diagnosed at earlier ages and presenting at later stage. These results conflict with a case-control study of overall and CagA-positive H. pylori and colorectal cancer risk in Germany that included 1,712 cases and 1,669 controls and found stronger associations with cancer of the left colon and rectum and with early-stage tumors (12). However, VacA status was not assessed and the cases were recruited during their hospital stay or even after surgery, which could affect the measurement of H. pylori antibodies.
Our findings of significant, strong dose-response associations of VacA antibodies with cancer of the right colon and cancers diagnosed at late stage and early onset provoke further questions. Since our findings are new and the interactions observed not specified a priori, and our sample is of only moderate size, the results need replication in additional prospective studies before causal inferences could be considered. Also, as sero-positivity to the five H. pylori proteins associated with colorectal cancer risk was highly correlated, we did not have the power to investigate the independent effects of each, although the results suggested that the findings appears to be primarily due to the association of VacA. There are mechanistic pathways – including gastrin production, gastric atrophy, and the expression of COX-2 – that might explain causality, but the presence of high levels of VacA antibodies could also be an indicator of a different underlying factor that we have not measured, such as baseline inflammatory state of the host. However, because of the high prevalence of H. pylori in the population we studied, and even in the general United States population for whom it is estimated that 53% of African Americans and 22% of whites are infected with H. pylori (41), the potential for a causal relationship needs to be explored in depth, as should it exist, opportunity for targeted cost-effective cancer prevention through H. pylori eradication therapy in high-risk populations could be explored.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial Support: The Southern Community Cohort Study is funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA092447). The development of Helicobacter pylori multiplex serology was funded in part by the Joint Initiative for Innovation and Research of the German Helmholtz Association. Analysis of the samples in this study was funded by a CTSA award (No. UL1TR000445) to Vanderbilt from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The serum/plasma sample preparations were performed at the Survey and Biospecimen Core, which is supported in part by the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA68485). R.M.P. is supported by DK R01 58587, CA R01 77955, and CA P01 116087.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None.
References
- 1.Zhao YS, Wang F, Chang D, Han B, You DY. Meta-analysis of different test indicators: Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:875–82. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0479-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zumkeller N, Brenner H, Zwahlen M, Rothenbacher D. Helicobacter pylori infection and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Helicobacter. 2006;11:75–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2006.00381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Konturek SJ, Konturek PC, Hartwich A, Hahn EG. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastrin and cyclooxygenase expression in gastric and colorectal malignancies. Regul Pept. 2000;93:13–9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(00)00173-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sobhani I, Lehy T, Laurent-Puig P, Cadiot G, Ruszniewski P, Mignon M. Chronic endogenous hypergastrinemia in humans: evidence for a mitogenic effect on the colonic mucosa. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:22–30. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burnett-Hartman AN, Newcomb PA, Potter JD. Infectious agents and colorectal cancer: a review of Helicobacter pylori, Streptococcus bovis, JC virus, and human papillomavirus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2970–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Peek RM., Jr Helicobacter pylori strain-specific modulation of gastric mucosal cellular turnover: implications for carcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37 (Suppl 13):10–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02990093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eom BW, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Cho JJ, Kim WH, Yang HK, et al. Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:106–10. doi: 10.1002/jso.21027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee JH, Bae JS, Ryu KW, Lee JS, Park SR, Kim CG, et al. Gastric cancer patients at high-risk of having synchronous cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:2588–92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yoon SN, Oh ST, Lim SB, Kim TW, Kim JH, Yu CS, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous and metachronous gastric cancer. World J Surgery. 2010;34:2168–76. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0623-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kan JY, Hsieh JS, Pan YS, Wang WM, Chen FM, Jan CM, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer and primary cancers of other organs. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2006;22:547–53. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70351-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blaser MJ. An endangered species in the stomach. Sci Am. 2005;292:38–45. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0205-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Y, Hoffmeister M, Weck MN, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H. Helicobacter pylori infection and colorectal cancer risk: evidence from a large population-based case-control study in Germany. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:441–50. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Limburg PJ, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Colbert LH, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ, Taylor PR, et al. Helicobacter pylori seropositivity and colorectal cancer risk: a prospective study of male smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:1095–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shmuely H, Passaro D, Figer A, Niv Y, Pitlik S, Samra Z, et al. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori CagA status and colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:3406–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05342.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544–73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Epplein M, Signorello LB, Zheng W, Peek RM, Jr, Michel A, Williams SM, et al. Race, African ancestry, and Helicobacter pylori infection in a low-income United States population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:826–34. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Signorello LB, Hargreaves MK, Steinwandel MD, Zheng W, Cai Q, Schlundt DG, et al. Southern community cohort study: establishing a cohort to investigate health disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:972–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Michel A, Waterboer T, Kist M, Pawlita M. Helicobacter pylori multiplex serology. Helicobacter. 2009;14:525–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2009.00723.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Waterboer T, Sehr P, Michael KM, Franceschi S, Nieland JD, Joos TO, et al. Multiplex human papillomavirus serology based on in situ-purified glutathione s-transferase fusion proteins. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1845–53. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Palframan SL, Kwok T, Gabriel K. Vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA), a key toxin for Helicobacter pylori pathogenesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:92. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Salama NR, Otto G, Tompkins L, Falkow S. Vacuolating cytotoxin of Helicobacter pylori plays a role during colonization in a mouse model of infection. Infect Immun. 2001;69:730–6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.730-736.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cover TL, Tummuru MK, Cao P, Thompson SA, Blaser MJ. Divergence of genetic sequences for the vacuolating cytotoxin among Helicobacter pylori strains. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:10566–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kountouras J, Zavos C, Chatzopoulos D, Katsinelos P. New aspects of Helicobacter pylori infection involvement in gastric oncogenesis. J Surg Res. 2008;146:149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alvarez A, Ibiza S, Hernandez C, Alvarez-Barrientos A, Esplugues JV, Calatayud S. Gastrin induces leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in vivo and contributes to the inflammation caused by Helicobacter pylori. FASEB J. 2006;20:2396–8. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5696fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brzozowski T, Konturek PC, Mierzwa M, Drozdowicz D, Bielanski W, Kwiecien S, et al. Effect of probiotics and triple eradication therapy on the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression, apoptosis, and functional gastric mucosal impairment in Helicobacter pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils. Helicobacter. 2006;11:10–20. doi: 10.1111/j.0083-8703.2006.00373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ, Kwiecien S, Pajdo R, Drozdowicz D, et al. Functional and morphological aspects of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric cancer in Mongolian gerbils. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:745–54. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000059155.68845.9d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gatta L, Di Mario F, Vaira D, Rugge M, Franze A, Plebani M, et al. Quantification of serum levels of pepsinogens and gastrin to assess eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:440–2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.D’Onghia V, Leoncini R, Carli R, Santoro A, Giglioni S, Sorbellini F, et al. Circulating gastrin and ghrelin levels in patients with colorectal cancer: correlation with tumour stage, Helicobacter pylori infection and BMI. Biomed Pharmacother. 2007;61:137–41. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Strofilas A, Lagoudianakis EE, Seretis C, Pappas A, Koronakis N, Keramidaris D, et al. Association of Helicobacter pylori infection and colon cancer. J Clin Med Res. 2012;4:172–6. doi: 10.4021/jocmr880w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thorburn CM, Friedman GD, Dickinson CJ, Vogelman JH, Orentreich N, Parsonnet J. Gastrin and colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:275–80. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70193-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Janulaityte-Gunther D, Kupcinskas L, Pavilonis A, Valuckas K, Wadstrom T, Andersen LP. Combined serum IgG response to Helicobacter pylori VacA and CagA predicts gastric cancer. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;50:220–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sokic-Milutinovic A, Wex T, Todorovic V, Milosavljevic T, Malfertheiner P. Anti-CagA and anti-VacA antibodies in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients with and without peptic ulcer disease in Serbia and Montenegro. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:222–6. doi: 10.1080/00365520310008403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rudi J, Kolb C, Maiwald M, Zuna I, von Herbay A, Galle PR, et al. Serum antibodies against Helicobacter pylori proteins VacA and CagA are associated with increased risk for gastric adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:1652–9. doi: 10.1023/a:1018849112533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Epplein M, Zheng W, Xiang YB, Peek RM, Jr, Li H, Correa P, et al. Prospective study of Helicobacter pylori biomarkers for gastric cancer risk among Chinese men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:2185–92. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0792-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sezikli M, Guliter S, Apan TZ, Aksoy A, Keles H, Ozkurt ZN. Frequencies of serum antibodies to Helicobacter pylori CagA and VacA in a Turkish population with various gastroduodenal diseases. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:1239–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kuo CH, Wu DC, Lu CY, Su YC, Yu FJ, Lee YC, et al. Low molecular weight protein of Helicobacter pylori and its relation to gastroduodenal diseases. Hepato-gastroenterology. 2003;50:897–901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de Sablet T, Piazuelo MB, Shaffer CL, Schneider BG, Asim M, Chaturvedi R, et al. Phylogeographic origin of Helicobacter pylori is a determinant of gastric cancer risk. Gut. 2011;60:1189–95. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.234468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hatakeyama M. Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:239–48. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0014-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sicinschi LA, Correa P, Peek RM, Camargo MC, Piazuelo MB, Romero-Gallo J, et al. CagA C-terminal variations in Helicobacter pylori strains from Colombian patients with gastric precancerous lesions. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:369–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02811.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Argent RH, Thomas RJ, Letley DP, Rittig MG, Hardie KR, Atherton JC. Functional association between the Helicobacter pylori virulence factors VacA and CagA. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:145–50. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47465-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cardenas VM, Graham DY. Smoking and Helicobacter pylori infection in a sample of U.S adults. Epidemiology. 2005;16:586–90. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165365.52904.4a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.