Abstract
Mild (140 to 159/90 to 99 mmHg) or moderate (160 to 179/100 to 109 mmHg) chronic arterial hypertension does not appear to cause headache. Whether moderate hypertension predisposes patients to headache at all remains controversial, but there is little evidence that it does. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with mild and moderate hypertension has shown no convincing relationship between blood pressure fluctuations over a 24-hour period and presence or absence of headache. However, headaches are associated to various disorders that lead to abrupt, severe, and paroxysmal elevations in blood pressure. In this paper, the secondary headaches attributed to acute crises of hypertension and the criteria for diagnosing each of them have been reviewed. These are headaches attributed to pheochromocytoma, hypertensive crisis without encephalopathy, hypertensive encephalopathy, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and acute pressure response to exogenous agents.
Keywords: Hypertension, Headache, Hypertensive Encephalopathy, Eclampsia, Pheochromocytoma
Introduction
Among the vast variety of secondary headaches, a considerable group is related to high blood pressure. Commonly, an abrupt elevation of arterial blood pressure is responsible for headache rather than the absolute value. HTN attributed headaches are discussed under 5 major categories and for each one definite criteria have been validated [International Headache Classification (IHCD-2)]1:
Pheochromocytoma (benign or malignant)
HTN crisis without encephalopathy
Hypertensive encephalopathy
Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
Acute pressure response to an exogenous agent
We will explain each of the items in more detail in this essay.
1. Pheochromocytoma (benign or malignant)
Pheochromocytoma is a catecholamine-producing tumor originated from chromaffin cells that are located in the adrenal medulla and sometimes the extra-adrenal tissues.2 It is known as “The tumor of tens”; 10% are extra-adrenal, 10% are bilateral, 10% are malignant, 10% are found in asymptomatic patients, and 10% are hereditary.3 Some of these percentages have changed according to more recent studies.
The incidence of pheochromocytoma is 0.5% in patients with hypertensive symptoms. The traditional triad of the disease are episodic headache, sweating, and palpitations.4 Other characteristic symptoms include visual disturbances, abdominal and chest pain, anxiety, nausea, and vomiting. The evaluation may reveal bilateral papilledema, orthostatic hypotension, and transient EKG changes. Patients usually have a persistent hypertension; although, detection of normal or low blood pressure in pheochromocytoma is not particularly rare.5 For example, patients who have a genetic predisposition to pheochromocytoma tend to be normotensive. Moreover, the tumor is probably smaller in size in this group of patients. These include about 24% of all the patients (contrary to the previously mentioned 10%).6
The most well-known familial syndromes associated with pheochromocytoma are Von Hipple-Lindau (VHL), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2), and Neurofibromatosis type 1(NF1); all of which have an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance.2
If one suspects the disorder in a patient on the basis of clinical presentations, the next diagnostic step is biochemical testing. The classic test is a measurement of urinary catecholamines and their metabolites, which have a sensitivity and specificity of 98%.7 The alternative is to measure plasma metanephrines that is extremely sensitive, and is suggested by some authorities as screening test. It has a sensitivity of about 99%, but the specificity is lower (85%–89%).8 In fact, the detection of excessive catecholamines or their metabolites in the urine or serum is the basis of diagnosis. Imaging studies should be used to localize the tumor.9 CT and MRI are useful in localizing the majority of tumors, except the smaller ones that are usually found in the hereditary form of disease.10 MIBG and PET scan are complementary imaging tools. These techniques are sensitive in bilateral tumors or in situations when the patient is suspicious of malignancy. Furthermore, they are useful when the tumor is greatly suspected in clinical settings, but the inspections have been nonconclusive.6
Medical therapy has a crucial role in symptomatic treatment, but surgery is essential for the cure.
Prevention of intraoperative catastrophic hypertensive crisis and the hypotension immediately after the surgery must be considered.11
As mentioned earlier, headache is an important symptom of pheochromocytoma. 51-80% of patients with pheochromocytoma describe headaches which are often paroxysmal. Paroxysmal headaches are severe, may have a persistent or pulsatile quality, and are usually located in the frontal or occipital region. Headache is typically accompanied by perspiration, palpitations, anxiety, and facial pallor, and is known to occur simultaneously with sudden elevation of blood pressure.12 In about 70% of patients the duration of headaches is less than1 hour.
Diagnostic criteria for headache in pheochromocytoma are included in Table 1.1
Table 1.
A. Intermittent discrete attacks of headache accompanied by at least one of the following and fulfilling criteria C and D. |
1. Sweating |
2. Palpitations |
3. Anxiety |
4. Pallor |
B. Pheochromocytoma demonstrated by biochemical investigations, imaging and/or surgery |
C. Headache develops concomitantly with abrupt rise in blood pressure |
D. Headache resolves or markedly improves within 1 hour of normalization of blood pressure |
2. HTN crisis without encephalopathy
Hypertensive crisis is an acute and severe elevation in blood pressure often described as SBP > 180 mmHg, or DBP > 120 mmHg. However, according to the International Headache Classification (IHCD-2), the definition is somewhat different (SBP > 160 mmHg, or DBP > 120 mmHg). It is discussed in the two subtypes of hypertensive urgency and hypertensive emergency depending on absence or presence of end organ damage, respectively.13 In addition, higher levels of blood pressure are observed in emergent condition. It is estimated that one to two percent of the hypertensive patients experience at least one episode of crisis in their life.14 The majority of patients have a history of established primary or secondary HTN.15
There is a peak of incidence for HTN crisis between the ages of 40 and 50 years.16 It is more common in males and African Americans. Patients with uncontrolled HTN may be at a higher risk of developing a crisis, although data is inadequate in this regard.17
Some disorders and medical conditions are related to hypertensive crisis; renal disorders (vascular or parenchymal), Cushing's disease, poor medication compliance, cocaine and PCP abuse, abrupt withdrawal of some antihypertensive agents such as clonidine, and etcetera.18
The precise mechanism of hypertensive crisis is not well understood. It is presumed that a diffuse vascular constriction caused by humoral factors is the trigger for the hypertensive process. The consequence is vascular endothelial injury and activation of coagulation factors leading to fibrinoid necrosis of the arterioles. Renin-angiotensin system and most vasoconstrictors, such as norepinephrine and vasopressin, add to the process and eventually we have rapid blood pressure elevation and end organ ischemic damage.19
Headache, epistaxis, faintness, psychomotor agitation, chest pain, dyspnea, neurologic deficits, and less often arrhythmias and paresthesias are the clinical presentations.20 Intracranial hemorrhage, acute aortic dissection, acute MI, and acute kidney injury are rare but serious complications of hypertensive crisis.21
Hypertensive crisis needs to be promptly treated in order to prevent lethal complications.
Hypertensive urgencies, once no serious end organ damage suspected, may be managed as outpatients with oral antihypertensive agents. However, hypertensive emergencies necessitate admission to the intensive care unit and aggressive therapy. Short-acting titratable intravenous antihypertensives, including labetalol, esmolol, fenoldopam, nicardipine, sodium nitroprusside, and etcetera, are the drugs of choice. Sodium nitroprusside has the risk of toxicity and should be used cautiously.18
Headache, as a symptom, has a prevalence of about 20% in hypertensive urgency. It has a bilateral throbbing quality. Helpful diagnostic criteria have been validated for the headaches based on the hypertensive crisis without encephalopathy regardless of the etiology.
Diagnostic criteria for headaches in HTN crisis without encephalopathy are listed in Table 2.1
Table 2.
A. Headache with at least one of the following characteristics and fulfilling criteria C and D: |
1. Bilateral |
2. Pulsating quality |
3. Precipitated by physical activity |
B. Hypertensive crisis defined as a paroxysmal rise in systolic (to > 160 mmHg) and/or diastolic (to > 120 mmHg) blood pressure but no clinical features of hypertensive encephalopathy |
C. Headache develops during hypertensive crisis |
D. Headache resolves within 1 hour after normalization of blood pressure |
E. Appropriate investigations have ruled out vasopressor toxins or medications as causative factors |
3. Hypertensive encephalopathy
Accelerated HTN, also named hypertensive encephalopathy, may result in disturbance of consciousness. It is usually related to hypertensive emergency, as already mentioned. In fact the encephalopathy syndrome (headache, neurologic deficit, seizure, and confusional state) is a type of organ damage in the setting of hypertensive emergency.22
Clinical presentation of hypertensive encephalopathy is due to the effect of high blood pressure on the blood brain barrier that impairs its integrity and leads to cerebral hyperperfusion and finally brain edema occurs. In a normal situation, the well-known cerebral autoregulatory effect inhibits the blood brain barrier from damage in a certain range of systolic blood pressure increments. Indeed, the autoregulatory mechanism is active as long as the mean arterial pressure (MAP) is kept in a range of 50-150 mmHg. In chronic hypertensive patients, as a consequence of adaptation, this range is shifted to higher levels of MAP.23
In extremely rapid accelerations of blood pressure, MAP exceeds the defined level and we have an orthostatic leakage of plasma across the capillaries. The condition is transient and predominant in posterior cerebral regions and is usually called posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES).24
The etiology of hypertensive encephalopathy is almost the same as those for hypertensive crisis without encephalopathy but in a more severe manner. Clinical signs and symptoms of hypertensive encephalopathy and probable accompanying signs and symptoms are listed in Table 3.25 It is mandatory to look for serious complications such as cerebral, cardiovascular, ophthalmic, and renal events.
Table 3.
Central nervous system | dizziness, nausea and vomiting, confusion, weakness, encephalopathy, ICH, SAH, ischemic stroke |
Eyes | ocular hemorrhage, exudates, papilledema, blurred vision, loss of sight |
Heart | angina, ACS, LVF, PE, aortic dissection, cardiogenic shock |
Kidneys | hematuria, proteinuria, pyelonephritis, elevated serum Cr and BUN, ARF |
ACS: Acute Coronary Syndrome, ARF: Acute Renal Failure, BUN: Blood Urea Nitrogen, Cr: Creatinine, ICH: Intracranial Hemorrhage, LVF: Left Ventricular Failure, PE: Pulmonary Edema, SAH: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Apparently, headache can be an important guiding symptom of the disorder and, has a vascular origin. Criteria for headache in hypertensive encephalopathy are listed in Table 4.1
Table 4.
A. Headache with at least one of the following characteristics and fulfilling criteria C and D: |
1. Diffuse pain |
2. Pulsating quality |
3. Aggravated by physical activity |
B. Persistent blood pressure elevation to > 160/100 mmHg with at least two of the following: |
1. Confusion |
2. Reduced level of consciousness |
3. Visual disturbances (other than those of typical migraine aura) including blindness |
4. Seizures |
C. Headache develops in close temporal relation to blood pressure elevation |
D. Headache resolves within 3 months after effective treatment and control of hypertension |
E. Other causes of the neurological symptoms have been excluded |
4. Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
Pre-eclampsia affects about 5-8% of pregnancies.26 It is part of a spectrum known as the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.27 Pre-eclampsia is characterized by hypertension, abnormal peripheral edema, and proteinuria.
The patient may complain of new persistent epigastric pain and vomiting. In examination, brisk tendon reflexes, and swelling of hands, face, or feet can be detected. A rise in serum creatinine, thrombocytopenia, and liver enzymes are the associated lab data abnormalities.28
A combination of maternal and placental factors contributes to the condition. Lack of previous pregnancy (nulliparity), obesity, a history of pre-eclampsia, and maternal medical comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, connective tissue disorders, or other thrombophilic situations) have been posed as the etiology. Patient's age is also a determinant factor; pre-eclampsia is more common before 18 and after 40 years of age.29 The incidence of pre-eclampsia is 9% in obese women in comparison with the 2% risk of incidence among the normal population.30
Pre-eclamptic women are subjected to cardiovascular complications. Studies show an approximately 4-fold increase in the risk of subsequent development of hypertension later in life, and a 2-fold increase in the risk of ischemic heart disease, venous thrombosis, and stroke in pre-eclamptic women.31
Magnesium sulfate is the drug of choice for women with pre-eclampsia since it halves the risk of eclampsia.28
Neurologic signs and symptoms are common presentations of the disorder, including severe persistent headache, visual defects (such as blurred vision, diplopia, or floating spots), confusion, depression of consciousness, and finally may lead to seizures or eclampsia. In this regard the manifestations are much the same as hypertensive encephalopathy.32 Pre-eclamptic headaches can be diagnosed using the criteria listed in Table 5.1
Table 5.
A. Headache with at least one of the following characteristics and fulfilling criteria C and D: |
1. Bilateral |
2. Pulsating quality |
3. Aggravated by physical activity |
B. Pregnancy or puerperium (up to 4 weeks postpartum), and pre-eclampsia defined by both of the following: |
1. Hypertension (> 140/90 mmHg) documented on two blood pressure readings at least 4 hours apart |
2. Urinary protein excretion > 0.3 g per 24 hours |
C. Headache develops during periods of high blood pressure |
D. Headache resolves within 7 days after effective treatment of hypertension |
E. Appropriate investigations have ruled out vasopressor toxins, medications, or pheochromocytoma as causative factors |
Whenever pre-eclampsia is superimposed by seizure or coma, or both, then it is named eclampsia.26 The underlying pathophysiology, to some extent, seems to be similar to hypertensive encephalopathy, which is cerebral overperfusion due to failure of autoregulatory response.33 In fact, these two circumstances are part of a spectrum known as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) which has characteristic features. Vasogenic brain edema is the underlying cause of this syndrome and accounts for the loss of consciousness.32
Imaging study, especially brain MRI, shows edema in the cortex and subcortical white matter that predominantly involves the occipital lobes.24 No reliable serum markers have been identified to predict the risk of eclampsia in pregnant women.34
It is very important to manage pre-eclampsia appropriately, as soon as the diagnosis is established, in order to prevent its progression to eclampsia, because the latter is harmful for both mother and fetus. There is absolute evidence that early administration of magnesium sulfate lessens the occurrence of eclampsia by more than 50% in pre-eclamptic women. Furthermore, it has been proved that magnesium sulfate is a more efficient drug to control eclamptic seizures in comparison with many antiepileptic drugs.35 Labor inductions are essentially the definite treatment for eclampsia.
Headache is a common warning symptom of eclampsia that should be inquired in any pregnant woman visited in perinatal care sessions. Criteria for headache in eclampsia are listed in Table 6.1
Table 6.
A. Headache with at least one of the following characteristics and fulfilling criteria C and D: |
1. Bilateral |
2. Pulsating quality |
3. Aggravated by physical activity |
B. Pregnancy or puerperium (up to 4 weeks post-partum), and eclampsia defined by all of the following: |
1. Hypertension (> 140/90 mmHg) documented on two blood pressure readings at least 4 hours apart |
2. Urinary protein excretion > 0.3 g per 24 hours |
3. A seizure has occurred |
C. Headache develops during periods of high blood pressure |
D. Headache resolves within 7 days after effective treatment of hypertension |
E. Appropriate investigations have ruled out vasopressor toxins, medications, or phaeochromocytoma as causative factors |
F. Stroke has been excluded |
5. Acute pressure response to an exogenous agent
In any patient who complains of headache and we detect a high blood pressure, it is essential to review his/her drugs and ask the patient about cocaine abuse. Acute pressure response to an exogenous agent may cause a hypertensive emergency. The most famous of the agents include cocaine, amphetamines, oral contraceptives, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), especially when interacting with tyramine-containing foods. Hypertensive emergency may also occur following the withdrawal of beta-blockers, alpha-stimulants (e.g. clonidine), or alcohol.36 Criteria related to this type of headache are listed in Table 7.1
Table 7.
A. Headache, no typical characteristics known, fulfilling criteria C and D |
B. An appropriate agent or toxin has been administered or ingested and an acute rise in blood pressure has occurred |
C. Headache develops in close temporal relation to the acute rise in blood pressure |
D. Headache resolves within 24 hours after normalization of blood pressure |
E. No other mechanism for the headache is apparent |
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.
References
- 1.Marchioni E, Tavazzi E, Bono G, Minoli L, Bastianello S, Sinforiani E, et al. Headache attributed to infection: observations on the IHS classification (ICHD-II) Cephalalgia. 2006;26(12):1427–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adler JT, Meyer-Rochow GY, Chen H, Benn DE, Robinson BG, Sippel RS, et al. Pheochromocytoma: current approaches and future directions. Oncologist. 2008;13(7):779–93. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bravo EL, Gifford RW., Jr Current concepts. Pheochromocytoma: diagnosis, localization and management. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(20):1298–303. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411153112007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manger WM. The vagaries of pheochromocytomas. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(10):1266–70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bravo EL, Tarazi RC, Gifford RW, Stewart BH. Circulating and urinary catecholamines in pheochromocytoma. Diagnostic and pathophysiologic implications. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(13):682–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197909273011302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pacak K, Linehan WM, Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Goldstein DS. Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(4):315–29. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-4-200102200-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kudva YC, Sawka AM, Young WF., Jr Clinical review 164: The laboratory diagnosis of adrenal pheochromocytoma: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(10):4533–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, Linehan WM, Mannelli M, Friberg P, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA. 2002;287(11):1427–34. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.11.1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shulkin BL, Ilias I, Sisson JC, Pacak K. Current trends in functional imaging of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:374–82. doi: 10.1196/annals.1353.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bravo EL. Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends. Kidney Int. 1991;40(3):544–56. doi: 10.1038/ki.1991.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Russell WJ, Metcalfe IR, Tonkin AL, Frewin DB. The preoperative management of phaeochromocytoma. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;26(2):196–200. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(1):9–160. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gifford RW., Jr Management of hypertensive crises. JAMA. 1991;266(6):829–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tisdale JE, Huang MB, Borzak S. Risk factors for hypertensive crisis: importance of out-patient blood pressure control. Fam Pract. 2004;21(4):420–4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grossman SH, Gunnells JC. Recognition and treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Cardiovasc Clin. 1981;11(3):97–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MH, Field L, Francis CK. Predisposing factors for severe, uncontrolled hypertension in an inner-city minority population. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(11):776–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209103271107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rodriguez MA, Kumar SK, De Caro M. Hypertensive crisis. Cardiol Rev. 2010;18(2):102–7. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c307b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG. Pathophysiological events leading to the end-organ effects of acute hypertension. Am J Emerg Med. 1985;3(6 Suppl):10–5. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90227-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zampaglione B, Pascale C, Marchisio M, Cavallo-Perin P. Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. Prevalence and clinical presentation. Hypertension. 1996;27(1):144–7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lip GY, Beevers M, Beevers DG. Complications and survival of 315 patients with malignant-phase hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995;13(8):915–24. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199508000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vaughan CJ, Delanty N. Hypertensive emergencies. Lancet. 2000;356(9227):411–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02539-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Immink RV, van den Born BJ, van Montfrans GA, Koopmans RP, Karemaker JM, van Lieshout JJ. Impaired cerebral autoregulation in patients with malignant hypertension. Circulation. 2004;110(15):2241–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144472.08647.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Kalina P, Bajakian RL, Mantello MT, Garada B, et al. Hypertensive encephalopathy: findings on CT, MR imaging, and SPECT imaging in 14 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159(2):379–83. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.2.1632361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Joseph RR. Management of Hypertensive Crises. US Pharm. 2009;34(5):HS8–HS12. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Donovan P. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Aust Prescr. 2012;35:47–50. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Report of the national high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(1):S1–S22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Duley L, Meher S, Abalos E. Management of pre-eclampsia. BMJ. 2006;332(7539):463–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7539.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Milne F, Redman C, Walker J, Baker P, Bradley J, Cooper C, et al. The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. BMJ. 2005;330(7491):576–80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P. Extreme obesity in pregnancy in the United Kingdom. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(5):989–97. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da8f09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335(7627):974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barton JR, Sibai BM. Cerebral pathology in eclampsia. Clin Perinatol. 1991;18(4):891–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Belfort MA, Varner MW, Dizon-Townson DS, Grunewald C, Nisell H. Cerebral perfusion pressure, and not cerebral blood flow, may be the critical determinant of intracranial injury in preeclampsia: a new hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(3):626–34. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schmidt AP, Tort AB, Amaral OB, Schmidt AP, Walz R, Vettorazzi-Stuckzynski J, et al. Serum S100B in pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders: a case-control study. Clin Chem. 2004;50(2):435–8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.027391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thompson S, Neal S, Clark V. Clinical risk management in obstetrics: eclampsia drills. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):269–71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2008;51(6):1403–19. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.189141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]