Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1979 Jan;76(1):328–332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.328

Conservative segregation of parental histones during replication in the presence of cycloheximide

Donald Riley 1, Harold Weintraub 1
PMCID: PMC382932  PMID: 284348

Abstract

Long stretches of protein-free, nonbeaded DNA were observed electron microscopically in nuclear spreads prepared from cells that had replicated their DNA in the absence of protein synthesis. The amount of this DNA increased with increasing time of replication in the presence of cycloheximide and was greatly decreased when replication was inhibited with 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (cytosine arabinoside). This DNA is considered to be “free” DNA because it has the same diameter as marker PM2 DNA and it is preferentially sensitive to DNase I digestion. Reversal of the cycloheximide block resulted in a burst of histone synthesis and repair of the depleted chromatin within 5 min. In addition, 26 presumptive replication forks were observed with beaded chromatin on two arms and free DNA on the third. These results suggest that new histones are usually deposited onto new DNA, that the cellular histone pool is very small, that histone migration is minimal in vivo for at least 18 hr, that for most fibers nuclesome assembly and segregation is conservative for stretches of DNA as long as 100 kbases, and that some part of the octameric histone core may remain bound to DNA during the replication process. The regularity we have observed for the assembly and segregation of nucleosomes is likely to be important for our understanding of how chromosomal information is segregated during development.

Keywords: free DNA, Miller spreads, transcription units

Full text

PDF
328

Images in this article

329Image
on p.329
329Image
on p.329
331Image
on p.331

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akiyama Y., Kato S. Two cell lines from lymphomas of Marek's disease. Biken J. 1974 Sep;17(3):105–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashburner M., Chihara C., Meltzer P., Richards G. Temporal control of puffing activity in polytene chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:655–662. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonner J., Dahmus M. E., Fambrough D., Huang R. C., Marushige K., Tuan D. Y. The Biology of Isolated Chromatin: Chromosomes, biologically active in the test tube, provide a powerful tool for the study of gene action. Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):47–56. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox R. F. Quantitation of elongating form A and B RNA polymerases in chick oviduct nuclei and effects of estradiol. Cell. 1976 Mar;7(3):455–465. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edenberg H. J., Huberman J. A. Eukaryotic chromosome replication. Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:245–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.09.120175.001333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Egyházi E. Quantitation of turnover and export to the cytoplasm of hnRNA transcribed in the Balbiani rings. Cell. 1976 Apr;7(4):507–515. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin. Nature. 1978 Jan 12;271(5641):115–122. doi: 10.1038/271115a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foe V. E., Wilkinson L. E., Laird C. D. Comparative organization of active transcription units in Oncopeltus fasciatus. Cell. 1976 Sep;9(1):131–146. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jamrich M., Greenleaf A. L., Bautz E. K. Localization of RNA polymerase in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 May;74(5):2079–2083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kornberg R. D. Structure of chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:931–954. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kriegstein H. J., Hogness D. S. Mechanism of DNA replication in Drosophila chromosomes: structure of replication forks and evidence for bidirectionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jan;71(1):135–139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leffak I. M., Grainger R., Weintraub H. Conservative assembly and segregation of nucleosomal histones. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):837–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90282-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McKnight S. L., Miller O. L., Jr Electron microscopic analysis of chromatin replication in the cellular blastoderm Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):795–804. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90278-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller O. L., Jr, Bakken A. H. Morphological studies of transcription. Acta Endocrinol Suppl (Copenh) 1972;168:155–177. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.071s155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller O. L., Jr, Beatty B. R. Visualization of nucleolar genes. Science. 1969 May 23;164(3882):955–957. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3882.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nazerian K., Lee L. F. Deoxyribonucleic acid of Marek's disease virus in a lymphoblastoid cell line from Marek's disease tumours. J Gen Virol. 1974 Nov;25(2):317–321. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-25-2-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reed S. I., Stark G. R., Alwine J. C. Autoregulation of simian virus 40 gene A by T antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Sep;73(9):3083–3087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.9.3083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roeder R. G. Multiple forms of deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent ribonucleic acid polymerase in Xenopus laevis. Isolation and partial characterization. J Biol Chem. 1974 Jan 10;249(1):241–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Seale R. L. Studies on the mode of segregation of histone nu bodies during replication in HeLa cells. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):423–429. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90087-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tegtmeyer P., Schwartz M., Collins J. K., Rundell K. Regulation of tumor antigen synthesis by simain virus 40 gene A. J Virol. 1975 Jul;16(1):168–178. doi: 10.1128/jvi.16.1.168-178.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weintraub H. Cooperative alignment of nu bodies during chromosome replication in the presence of cycloheximide. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):419–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weintraub H., Holtzer H. Fine control of DNA synthesis in developing chick red blood cells. J Mol Biol. 1972 Apr 28;66(1):13–35. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(72)80003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weintraub H. The assembly of newly replicated DNA into chromatin. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:247–256. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES