Skip to main content
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery logoLink to Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
. 2013 Dec;17(6):973. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt458

eComment. Positron emission tomography reduces the incidence of surgery for non-malignant conditions in lung cancer screening programmes

Paolo Scanagatta 1, Stefano Sestini 1
PMCID: PMC3829522  PMID: 24243944

We read with interest the well-written study of Rzyman et al. about the incidence of surgery for non-malignant conditions in the participants of the Gdansk lung cancer screening trial [1]. We would like to add some comments to the discussion.

The authors reported a high rate of surgery for benign lesions (37/104, 35.6%), while the recently published results of the incidence screenings of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) showed an overall proportion of less than 20% [2].

This is probably due to the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in the work-up of positive results, as previously demonstrated in several screening programmes and according to its recognized clinical role in the detection and stage grouping of lung cancer [3]. In our opinion PET should be considered in lung cancer screening as an important non-invasive second level tool, and its use would help to reduce invasive exams such as fine-needle aspiration biopsy and bronchoscopy [4].

Moreover, the Lung Cancer Screening Guideline Development Group pointed out that follow-up algorithms should be developed to decrease the false-positive rate and reduce unnecessary invasive procedures; priorities should include long-term safety and effectiveness, cost effectiveness and available resources [5].

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

  • 1.Rzyman W, Jelitto-Gorska M, Dziedzic R, Biadacz I, Ksiazek J, Chwirot P, et al. Diagnostic work-up and surgery in participants of the Gdansk lung cancer screening programme: the incidence of surgery for non-malignant conditions. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2013;17:969–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD, Black WC, Brewer B, Church TR, et al. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med 2013;369:920–31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Veronesi G, Bellomi M, Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Maisonneuve P, Scanagatta P, et al. Role of positron emission tomography scanning in the management of lung nodules detected at baseline computed tomography screening. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:959–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wagnetz U, Menezes RJ, Boerner S, Paul NS, Wagnetz D, Keshavjee S, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: implication of lung biopsy recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:351–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roberts H, Walker-Dilks C, Sivjee K, Ung Y, Yasufuku K, Hey A, et al. Screening high-risk populations for lung cancer: Guideline recommendations. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1232–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES