Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Echocardiography. 2013 Aug 10;31(1):10.1111/echo.12303. doi: 10.1111/echo.12303

Table V.

Proportion of agreed classification (below diagonal) and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (above diagonal) for the classification of hypertrophy, according to the different image modalities and indices. In gray, results for inter-modality agreement

Normalization Methodology PLVH (%) 2D CMR Echocardiography


BSA height1.7 height2.7 %predicted BSA height1.7 height2.7 %predicted
2D CMR BSA 5.5 * 0.41 0.44 0.76 0.37 0.11§ 0.29 0.44
height1.7 3.4 93% * 0.61 0.37 0.23¥ 0.23 0.23¥ 0.23¥
height2.7 6.8 94% 95% * 0.55 0.33 0.14¥ 0.36 0.25
%predicted 6.2 98% 94% 96% * 0.42 0.10§ 0.34 0.59
Echo BSA 11.6 90% 87% 89% 92% * 0.41 0.53 0.42
height1.7 24.0 77% 79% 77% 77% 82% * 0.41 0.20
height2.7 7.5 92% 90% 92% 93% 92% 84% * 0.34
%predicted 3.4 95% 92% 93% 97% 92% 79% 93% *

CMR – Cardiac Magnetic Resonance; BSA – body-surface area; Echo – echocardiography; PLVH – Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy; %predicted - percent of the predicted LVM from a reference group of healthy subjects.

p < 0.001,

¥

p ≤0.01 and

§

p < 0.05 for test of null hypothesis that kappa=0