Abstract
Coumarin-functionalized cellulose sheets were chemically modified using a visible light catalyzed “Photo-Meerwein” arylation. Use of a photomask to pattern the surface resulted in directly visible images.
The selective functionalization of surfaces is important in many research areas. Creating defined mono- or multilayer structures requires surface patterning techniques with resolutions spanning from macroscopic to sub-nanometer scales.1, 2 Patterned surfaces allow the development of sensor materials,3 shape-changing materials,4 microelectronic devices such as light-emitting displays5 and plastic electronics,6 as well as the production of photonic crystals,7, 8 and are important in the study of cells.9, 10
The scope of patterning techniques is large and can be divided into printing methods,11 direct writing techniques,2 electrochemical,12–14 and photochemical methods.15 Printing methods do not require masks and include screen printing,2 nanoimprinting,16 microcontact printing by a stamp that transfers an inked material to the substrate,17–19 and ink-jet printing where a jet of a polymer solution breaks up into droplets, which are deposited onto a surface and form a pattern when the solvent evaporates.2, 11 Direct writing allows a resolution down to the submicrometer range by nanografting:20 the tip of a scanning probe microscope scratches the surface. In photolithography, a monomer- or polymer-coated surface is exposed to photoirradiation in order to trigger photo-polymerization or -decomposition.2, 15, 21
Modifications have been accomplished on a diverse array of surface materials. Depending on their application, it may be necessary to functionalize conductors, semiconductors, or insulators. Important materials in this respect are metals (gold), glass, carbon, graphene sheets,22 inorganic quantum dots (CdSe,23 TiO2), bionanomaterials, and polymers (PVC, PET). Existing polymers can be modified with one of the above-mentioned methods, or polymerization can be initiated on a surface. Aryl radicals can induce polymerization or bind directly to the surface and both processes have been used for surface functionalization.24, 25
We have previously described a “Photo-Meerwein” arylation reaction for the homogeneous cross-coupling of an aryl diazonium salt with an unsaturated compound, activated by means of a photocatalyst and visible light (Scheme 1a). The reaction works both inter- and intramolecularly, and is suitable for the arylation of olefins such as styrenes, enones, enol esters, alkynes, and heteroarenes with various functionalized aryl diazonium salts.26–29 In contrast to thermal or chemical initiation of the aryl radical formation, light allows a spatial control of the reaction on surfaces (Scheme 1b). We describe here the selective patterning of a cellulose surface using a visible light photocatalyzed Meerwein reaction.
Scheme 1.
Homogeneous and heterogeneous “Photo-Meerwein” arylation.
A prerequisite for accomplishing spatial resolution is the covalent immobilization of one of the two coupling partners on the surface.30 Suitably modified surfaces can undergo selective coupling in the presence of a solution of the second coupling partner and the photocatalyst, using a photomask to limit the irradiation area. Only irradiated parts of the surface will undergo carbon-carbon bond formation, leading to a patterned arylated surface which can be detected by optical methods.
Coumarins react in a “Photo-Meerwein” arylation26 with diazonium salts in high yields. The absorption and emission of the chromophore is sensitive to the local environment of the molecule,31 including perichromic shifts by surface immobilization.32 Although the parent coumarin itself absorbs only ultraviolet light, a suitable polar surface will shift the absorption considerably towards the visible region. The photo-catalytic arylation of the coumarin chromophore causes an additional red-shift, easily detectable by the naked eye. We therefore selected coumarins to functionalize a surface for subsequent photo-patterning, as the arylation reaction can be visually monitored by a color change. 7-Hydroxycoumarin 1 was prepared from 1,3-dihydroxybenzene 5 and β-ketoester 6 under acidic conditions following a reported procedure.33
Cellulose contains several hydroxyl moieties able to serve as anchors for the covalent attachment of unsaturated chromophore 1. The 7-hydroxy group of 1 represents the linker for attachment to the cellulose polymer. From the various hydroxyl groups in the polymer, the 6′-hydroxyl group is the most reactive.34 Attachment of 1 via ether formation was achieved by tosylation of the 6′-hydroxyl group of cellulose in form of filter papers followed by reaction with 1 (Scheme 3). The loading of cellulose with coumarin 1 was determined gravimetrically to be 21% ±3% with respect to the amount of glucose monomers as the average over three independent experiments. The method is suitable for the modification of larger cellulose sheets. In our case, standard filter paper 45 mm in diameter proved convenient for modification.
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of functionalized cellulose sheets. Loading of 21% coumarin per glucose monomer unit indicates a ratio of n:m of about 4:1.
Cellulose filter paper sheets functionalized in this way were then used for photocatalytic experiments. Modified cellulose was soaked with a solution of p-methoxyphenyl diazonium tetrafluoroborate and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in DMSO. A photomask covering part of the area was placed on the filter paper, and the setup was irradiated for 20 minutes with a blue high power light emitting diode. The filter paper was rinsed with methanol, water, and acetone, and dried in air. A pattern was immediately visible on the surface, as shown in Scheme 4.
Scheme 4.
a) Photographs of coumarin-functionalized cellulose reacted with an aryl diazonium salt and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ photocatalyst through a mask before and b) after exposure to visible light; c) magnified boundary between illuminated and dark cellulose; d) fluorescence emission at excitation with 366 nm; e) schematic molecular description of contrast formation through a photomask.
We attribute the absorption property changes to the photocatalytic arylation reaction that proceeded in irradiated areas, but not in surface areas of the cellulose sheet that were covered by the photomask. The reaction proceeds equally well with eosin Y as metal-free photocatalyst, but the contrast of the image is lower in this case because removal of the dye eosin Y is less effective. A schematic description of the image formation is given in the following scheme. It is noteworthy that the 4-methyl group in 7-hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one 3 has little effect on the molecule’s absorption maximum, but blocks the 4-position for arylation leading to the selective formation of a single product.
Control experiments using the identical setup without either photocatalyst, aryl diazonium salt, or light showed no pattern formation on the surface, indicating that all three reagents are indispensable for successful photoreaction. Absorption and emission spectra of the functionalized cellulose have been measured before and after the reaction. Diffuse UV/Vis reflectance spectra of the paper samples were recorded and converted into absorption spectra applying the Kubelka-Munk transformation. Coumarin-functionalized cellulose 3 showed two absorption bands at 322 and 401 nm. After arylation, the bands of 4 were red-shifted to 349 and 404 nm, respectively. Fluorescence measurements of the cellulose paper samples (excitation wavelength 404 nm) showed two emission maxima at 421 and 496 nm before and at 438 and 505 nm after the photoreaction (Scheme 6).
Scheme 6.
Absorption (left) and emission spectra (right) of cellulose-immobilized coumarins 3 and 4 (top) and compounds 1 and 2 obtained from “Photo-Meerwein” arylation in homogeneous solution (bottom). Absorption and emission spectra (excitation wavelength 318 nm) in homogeneous solution were measured in DMSO at c = 4·10−5 molL−1.
For comparison, the analogous arylation reaction was performed in homogeneous DMSO solution (Scheme 1a). 7-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one 1 and the corresponding arylated photoproduct 2 showed absorption bands in DMSO at 292 and 318 nm before and 289 and 329 nm after the photoreaction. The absorption bands can be assigned to a π-π* transition.35 The large bathochromic shift of about 80 nm in heterogeneous solution compared to the smaller changes in the homogeneous case is rationalized by the polar environment of the cellulose surface. The emission spectrum in DMSO (excitation wavelength 318 nm) of the photoproduct 2 shows two maxima at 396 and 484 nm, while the corresponding peaks of reactant 1 are at 359 and 424 nm.
As an additional proof of the formation of the 3-arylated photoproduct on cellulose, the arylated coumarin 2 was attached to cellulose for comparison. 7-Hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4- methyl-2H-chromen-2-one 2 (Scheme 5) was immobilized in the same manner as described in Scheme 3. Absorption spectra of this sample were recorded and showed within the error of the measurement the identical absorption maxima as material of the heterogeneous photoreaction, confirming the proposed formation of the arylated photoproduct.
Scheme 5.

Synthetic route towards 3-aryl-2H-chromen-2-one.
Conclusions
Aryl radicals have previously been used for the direct modification of metal surfaces and polymer grafting on surfaces. We have extended the scope of such surface modifications to the arylation of coumarin-functionalized cellulose sheets using a Photo-Meerwein arylation reaction. The catalytic process generates aryl radicals from diazonium salts in the presence of the photocatalyst [Ru(bpy)3]2+ upon irradiation with visible light. Such arylation of the coumarin alters the photophysical properties of the chromophore, leading to an image observable with the naked eye. The application of this spatially-controlled surface arylation protocol to diverse surface media bearing alkene or alkyne groups and a large variety of diazonium salts as aryl radical precursors can be readily envisaged.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of 7-hydroxyl coumarin by the Pechmann reaction.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany, DFG GRK 1626 – Chemical Photocatalysis), the Evonik Foundation (Germany, stipend for P.S.), and the NIH Dynamic Aspects of Chemical Biology Training Grant (USA, support for C.F.).
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, characterization data and calculations for all compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
References
- 1.Cremer PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:167–169. doi: 10.1021/ja110962h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nie Z, Kumacheva E. Nat Mater. 2008;7:277–290. doi: 10.1038/nmat2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoon SJ, Chung JW, Gierschner J, Kim KS, Choi MG, Kim D, Park SY. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13675–13683. doi: 10.1021/ja1044665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seo W, Phillips ST. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:9234–9235. doi: 10.1021/ja104420k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shimoda T, Morii K, Seki S, Kiguchi H. Mater Res Soc Bull. 2003;28:821–827. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh TB, Sariciftci NS. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2006;36:199–230. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Valkama S, Kosonen H, Ruokolainen J, Haatainen T, Torkkeli M, Serimaa R, ten Brinke G, Ikkala O. Nat Mater. 2004;3:872–876. doi: 10.1038/nmat1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Turberfield AJ, Campbell M, Sharp DN, Harrison MT, Denning RG. Nature. 2000;404:53–56. doi: 10.1038/35003523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Théry M, Racine V, Pépin A, Piel M, Chen Y, Sibarita JB, Bornens M. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:947–953. doi: 10.1038/ncb1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Théry M, Racine V, Piel M, Pepin A, Dimitrov A, Chen Y, Sibarita JB, Bornens M. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:19771–19776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609267103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garcia A, Hanifi N, Jousselme B, Jégou P, Palacin S, Viel P, Berthelot T. Adv Funct Mater. 2013:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Belanger D, Pinson J. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:3995–4048. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00149j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luo W, Chan EWL, Yousaf MN. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:2614–2621. doi: 10.1021/ja907187f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Unruh DA, Mauldin C, Pastine SJ, Rolandi M, Frechet JMJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:6890–6891. doi: 10.1021/ja101627e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Orski SV, Poloukhtine AA, Arumugam S, Mao L, Popik VV, Locklin J. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:11024–11026. doi: 10.1021/ja105066t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Menard E, Meitl MA, Sun Y, Park JU, Shir DJL, Nam YS, Jeon S, Rogers JA. Chem Rev. 2007;107:1117–1160. doi: 10.1021/cr050139y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wendeln C, Ravoo BJ. Langmuir. 2012;28:5527–5538. doi: 10.1021/la204721x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cui Y, Pattabiraman A, Lisko B, Collins SC, McAlpine MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1204–1205. doi: 10.1021/ja9081809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gates BD, Xu Q, Stewart M, Ryan D, Willson CG, Whitesides GM. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1171–1196. doi: 10.1021/cr030076o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu GY, Xu S, Qian Y. Acc Chem Res. 2000;33:457–466. doi: 10.1021/ar980081s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pimpin A, Srituravanich W. Engineering Journal. 2012:16, 37–56. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mativetsky JM, Treossi E, Orgiu E, Melucci M, Veronese GP, Samori P, Palermo V. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:14130–14136. doi: 10.1021/ja104567f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen J, Chan YH, Yang T, Wark SE, Son DH, Batteas JD. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:18204–18205. doi: 10.1021/ja906837s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mévellec V, Roussel S, Tessier L, Chancolon J, Mayne-L_Hermite M, Deniau G, Viel P, Palacin S. Chem Mater. 2007;19:6323–6330. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bouriga M, Chehimi MM, Combellas C, Decorse P, Kanoufi F, Deronzier A, Pinson J. Chem Mater. 2013;25:90–97. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schroll P, Hari DP, König B. ChemistryOpen. 2012;1:130–133. doi: 10.1002/open.201200011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hering T, Hari DP, König B. J Org Chem. 2012;77:10347–10352. doi: 10.1021/jo301984p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hari DP, Schroll P, König B. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:2958–2961. doi: 10.1021/ja212099r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hari DP, Hering T, König B. Org Let. 2012;14:5334–5337. doi: 10.1021/ol302517n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pauloehrl T, Delaittre G, Winkler V, Welle A, Bruns M, Börner HG, Greiner AM, Bastmeyer M, Barner-Kowollik C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:1071–1074. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wagner BD. Molecules. 2009;14:210–237. doi: 10.3390/molecules14010210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reichardt C. Chem Rev. 1994;94:2319–2358. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pechmann Hv. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1884;17:929–936. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Heuser E, Heath M, Shockley WH. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1950;72:670–674. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Song PS, Gordon WH. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1970;74:4234–4240. doi: 10.1021/j100718a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




