Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2004 Apr;70(4):2556–2559. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2556-2559.2004

Serotyping, stx2 Subtyping, and Characterization of the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement Island of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and E. coli O157:H7 Strains Isolated from the Environment in France

C Vernozy-Rozand 1,*, M P Montet 1, Y Bertin 2, F Trably 1, J P Girardeau 2, C Martin 2, V Livrelli 3, L Beutin 4
PMCID: PMC383133  PMID: 15066860

Abstract

Twenty-seven Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains were isolated from 207 stx-positive French environmental samples. Ten of these strains were positive for stx1, and 24 were positive for stx2 (10 were positive for stx2vh-a or stx2vh-b, 19 were positive for stx2d, and 15 were positive for stx2e). One strain belonged to serotype O157:H7, and the others belonged to serogroups O2, O8, O11, O26, O76, O103, O113, O121, O141, O166, and O174. The environment is a reservoir in which new clones of STEC that are pathogenic for humans can emerge.


Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) can survive over long periods in slurries, farmyard manure, and sludge as well as on pasture land and in associated water systems. This observation has important implications for the spread of STEC to crops by direct application of manure or irrigation with infected water or the transmission of these strains directly to humans by contact with animals or contaminated soil (17, 25). Data on the presence of STEC in sewage or polluted water and slurries are limited and difficult to compare (11, 14, 16).

In contrast to a previous study that determined STEC prevalence in manure, slurries, and sewage sludge in France (24), the objective of the present work was to characterize STEC isolates. The detection of the virulence genes and the stx2 subtypes enabled some speculation about the public health significance of STEC. The study of serotypes combined with that of the locus of enterocyte effacement island (LEE) allowed a better appreciation of the heterogeneity of the isolates and helped to determine whether the environment could be one of the main reservoirs in which new clones pathogenic for humans could emerge.

Four different types of sources were sampled: municipal sewage sites, waste storage lagoons, pig farms, and dairy cattle herds. Nine hundred eighty-eight samples were investigated: 95 farmyard manure samples, 201 bovine feces samples, 144 slurry samples, 10 compost samples, and 538 samples from outflows of sewage wastewater treatment plants. Twelve samples were taken from each source, and each source was sampled only once. The samples were collected over 1 year from two different geographical regions that are representative of France: Bourgogne and Rhone-Alpes. The bacterial enrichment procedure, the detection and isolation of STEC strains, and the identification of the isolates were performed as described by Vernozy-Rozand et al. (24).

All STEC strains were investigated for motility and biochemical properties (such as fermentation of sorbitol in 24 h, β-d-glucuronidase activity, and enterohemolytic phenotype) and were serotyped for their O and H antigens as previously described (3, 15, 18). The Vero cell toxicity assay was performed according to a protocol described previously (4, 5). Vero cells were cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Gibco BRL). Genetic characterization of the isolates with regard to the presence of stx1, stx2, subtypes of stx2, and types of eae, tir, espA, espB and the insertion of the LEE at selC, pheU, or pheV, was performed as previously described (1, 2, 8, 9, 21; V. Livrelli, Y. Bertin, N. Pradel, N. Blanchet, B. Joly, and C. Martin, unpublished data).

Twenty-one percent (207 of 988) of the samples were stx positive by PCR. Samples from clarifiers of waste storage lagoons and wastewater treatment plants had contamination rates of 80 and 48%, respectively. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Holler et al. (13), who sampled the inflow and outflow of sewage treatment plants in northern Germany and found 90% of the samples to be positive for stx1 or stx2.

We isolated 27 STEC strains from the 207 stx-positive samples (13%) by colony hybridization with stx1 and stx2 gene probes. Three of the 27 STEC isolates belonged to serogroups O26, O103, and O157. The other serotypes are given in Table 1. Serogroups O26, O55, O111, O103, and O157:H7 are the STEC serogroups isolated most frequently from French human patients with hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (12). Twenty-four STEC strains possessed the stx2 gene, and 10 possessed the stx1 gene. Seven strains (26%) possessed both stx1 and stx2. Seven (26%) strains were eaeA positive, and 18 (66%) were ehxA positive. Nine STEC strains carried three different virulence factors (stx, eae, and ehxA) (Table 1). These strains should be considered potentially pathogenic for humans.

TABLE 1.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of isolatesa

Origin of strain Strain no. Sample type Serotypeb Hemolysin phenotypec Status regarding:
stx2 variant(s)
eae gene ehxA gene Verocytotoxin production stx1 gene stx2 gene
Wastewater treatment plant V1 Slurry O166:H28 ehly N P P N P stx2e, stx2d-Ount
V2 Clarifier O113:H4 N P P P N P stx2-NV206, stx2d
V3 Slurry pit O2:H27 N N P P N P stx2-EDL933, stx2d
V4 Aerator O76:H19 ehly P P P P P stx2e, stx2d-Ount
V5 Clarifier O26:H11 ehly P P P P N N
V6 Sludge O76:H19 ehly N P P P P stx2e, stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V7 Clarifier O76:H19 ehly P P P P P stx2e, stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V8 O76:H19 ehly N P P N P stx2-EDL933
V9 Aerator O157:H7 ehly P P P P P stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V10 Clarifier O11:H43 N N N P N P N
Pig farms V11 Feces Ont:H4 alpha N N P N P stx2e
V12 Feces O141:H4 alpha N N P N P stx2e
V13 Feces O8:H19 −N N N P N P stx2-NV206, stx2e, stx2d
V14 Feces O103:H2 ehly P P P N P stx2e, stx2d
V15 Feces Ont:H19 N N P P P P stx2vh-b, stx2e, stx2d-Ount
V16 Feces O121:H− N N N P N P stx2e
Dairy cattle herd V17 Feces Ont:H38 N P P P N P stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V18 Feces Orough:H25 ehly P P P N P stx2e, stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V19 Feces Orough:H25 alpha P P P N P stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V20 Feces O113:H4 N N N P N P stx2-NV206, stx2e, stx2d
V21 Manure O174:H21 N N N P N P stx2vh-b, stx2e, stx2d-Ount
V22 Manure O174:H21 N N N P N P stx2vh-b, stx2e, stx2d-Ount
V23 Manure O174:H21 ehly N P P P P stx2e, stx2-EDL933, stx2d
V24 Slurry pit O8:H19 ehly N P P P N N
V25 Ont:H8 N N P P P N N
V26 Feces O174:H− N N N P N P stx2vh-a, stx2d-Ount
V27 Manure O8:H19 ehly N P P P P stx2-EDL933, stx2d
a

P, positive; N, negative.

b

Orough, rough; Ont, O type not corresponding to any serogroup between O1 and O174.

c

ehly, hemolysis after a 22-h incubation step; alpha, hemolysis after 3- to 4-h incubation step.

Epidemiological studies, together with in vivo and in vitro experiments, have revealed that stx2 is the most important virulence factor associated with severe human disease (6, 19). The genes encoding these toxins (stx genes) are encoded by lambdoid bacteriophages. At least 12 stx2 gene variants have been described (1, 2, 23). Some of these variants, which are associated with STEC strains isolated from specific hosts such as sheep (stx2d) and pigs (stx2e), are probably less pathogenic for humans (10, 26). The type of variant could thus reflect not only the origins and relationships but also the virulences of the different STEC strains.

In our collection of environmental STEC strains isolated in France, the most frequent stx2 subtype was stx2d (70% of the isolates), followed by stx2e (55%) and stx2vh-a or stx2vh-b (37%). The stx2e variants were isolated from pig samples but also from a dairy cattle herd, a finding which is not in accordance with data given in the literature (7, 20) and suggests the spread of STEC from pigs to cattle.

The presence of more than one stx2 gene, which was observed in 70% of our STEC isolates, could contribute to the level of toxin production and thus to the virulence of environmental isolates.

In a previous study, an absolute correlation between the presence of eae and the presence of the other genes of the LEE was found (2). The LEE gene was not detected in eae-negative strains. On the basis of these findings, we used the eae gene to screen for LEE-positive STEC isolates. EspA, EspB, Tir, and intimin proteins encoded by different LEEs show high degrees of sequence polymorphism. To date, 10 distinct variants of eae and three variants of espA, espB, and tir have been described (22, 27). Previous studies have indicated that some serotypes are highly associated with a particular intimin variant (8, 9). These associations were confirmed in our study; the O157 serogroup is associated with eaeγ, the O26 serogroup is associated with eaeβ, and the O103 serogroup is associated with eaeɛ. No other eae variants, including eaeα, were found. In this study, we detected only three distinct pathotypes, and except for the O103 STEC strain, tir, espA, and espB genes were always of the same type within a pathotype. We also observed a high degree of heterogeneity among the seven eae-positive isolates from our collection relative to the LEE integration site as well as the sequences of the right and left ends of the LEE (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Characterization of the LEE

Origin of strain Strain no. Serotype Subtype of gene
PCR analysis result fora:
selC site
pheU site
pheV site
eae espA espB tir Intact (K260/K295) Right side (K260/K255) Left side (K295/K296) Intact (K913/K916) Right side
Left side (P54/P15) pheV (913/914) Intact (pheVF/pheVR) Right side (P64/P86)
K913/K917 P119/P32
Wastewater treatment plant V4 O76:H19 β β β β N N N N P N N N N P
V5 O26:H11 β β β β N N N N P N N N N P
V9 O157:H7 γ γ γ γ N P P P N N N P N P
Pig farm V14 O103:H2 ɛ βv β β P N N N N N N N N N
Dairy cattle herd V17 Ont:H38 β β β β N N N N P N N N N N
V18 Orough:H25 β β β β N N N N P N P N N P
V19 Orough:H25 β β β β N N N N P N N N N N
a

N, negative; P, positive. K260, K295, K255, K296, K913, K916, K917, P119, P32, P54, P15, 913, 914, pheVF, pheVR, P64, and P86 are primers.

This study demonstrated that the environment is a reservoir in which new clones of STEC that are pathogenic for humans could emerge. A comparison with STEC strains isolated from patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome will be undertaken in the near future.

Our results emphasize that appropriate handling and use of manure, slurry, and sewage sludge are necessary so that contamination of the environment and food by STEC can be prevented.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries for its financial support.

We thank A. Beddiaf for her technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bertin, Y., K. Boukhors, N. Pradel, V. Livrelli, and C. Martin. 2001. Stx2 subtyping of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle in France: detection of a new Stx2 subtype and correlation with additional virulence factors. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3060-3065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bertin, Y., K. Boukhors, V. Livrelli, and C. Martin. 2004. Localization of the insertion site and pathotype determination of the locus of enterocyte effacement of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:61-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beutin, L., S. Zimmermann, and K. Gleier. 1996. Rapid detection and isolation of Shiga-like toxin (verocytotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli by direct testing of individual enterohemolytic colonies from washed sheep blood agar plates in the VTEC-RPLA assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2812-2814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beutin, L., S. Zimmermann, and K. Gleier. 1998. Human infections with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli other than serogroup O157 in Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:635-639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beutin, L., K. Gleier, and S. Zimmermann. 1999. Comparative evaluation of different diagnostic methods for detection of Shiga toxin-producing strains of Escherichia coli (STEC) in human clinical stool specimens, p. 89-93. In G. Duffy, P. Garvey, J. Coia, Y. Wasteson, and D. A. McDowell (ed.), Verocytotoxigenic E. coli in Europe. Concerted action CT98-3935. 1. Methods for verocytotoxigenic E. coli, Teagasc. The National Food Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
  • 6.Boerlin, P., S. A. McEwen, F. Boerlin-Petzold, J. B. Wilson, R. P. Johnson, and C. L. Gyles. 1999. Associations between virulence factors of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and disease in humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:497-503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bouvet, J., M. P. Montet, R. Rossel, A. Leroux, C. Bavai, S. Ray-Gueniot, C. Mazuy, V. Atrache, and C. Vernozy-Rozand. 2002. Prevalence of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) and E. coli O157:H7 in French pork. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93:7-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.China, B., F. Goffaux, V. Pirson, and J. Mainil. 1999. Comparison of eae, tir, espA and espB genes of bovine and human attaching and effacing Escherichia coli by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 178:177-182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.China, B., E. Jacquemin, A. C. Devrin, V. Pirson, and J. Mainil. 1999. Heterogeneity of the eae genes in attaching/effacing Escherichia coli from cattle: comparison with human strains. Res. Microbiol. 150:323-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Friedrich, A. W., M. Bielaszewska, W. L. Zhang, M. Pulz, T. Kuczius, A. Ammon, and H. Karch. 2002. Escherichia coli harboring Shiga toxin 2 gene variants: frequency and association with clinical symptoms. J. Infect. Dis. 185:74-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grant, S. R., C. P. Pendroy, C. L. Mayer, J. K. Bellin, and C. J. Palmer. 1996. Prevalence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in raw and treated municipal sewage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3466-3469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grimont, F. 1998. Recherche de Escherichia coli pathogènes dans les selles. Spectra Biol. 17:27-36. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holler, C., S. Koschinsky, and D. Witthuhn. 1999. Isolation of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli from municipal sewage. Lancet 353:2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lang, A. L., Y. L. Tsai, C. L. Mayer, K. C. Patton, and C. J. Palmer. 1994. Multiplex PCR for detection of the heat-labile toxin gene and Shiga-like toxin I and II genes in Escherichia coli isolated from natural waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:3145-3149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Machado, J., F. Grimont, and P. A. Grimont. 2000. Identification of Escherichia coli flagellar types by restriction of the amplified fliC gene. Res. Microbiol. 151:535-546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martins, M. T., I. G. Rivera, D. L. Clark, and B. H. Olson. 1992. Detection of virulence factors in culturable Escherichia coli isolates from water samples by DNA probes and recovery of toxin-bearing strains in minimal o-nitro-phenol-β-d-galactopyranoside-4-methylumbelliferyl-β-d-glucuronide media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3095-3100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maule, A. 2000. Survival of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil, water and on surfaces. Symp. Ser. Soc. Appl. Microbiol. 29:71S-78S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Orskov, F., and I. Orskov. 1984. Serotyping of Escherichia coli. Methods Microbiol. 14:43-112. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paton, A. W., and J. C. Paton. 1998. Detection and characterization of shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by using multiplex PCR assays for stx1, stx2, eaeA, enterohemorrhagic E. coli hlyA, rfbO111, and rfbO157. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:598-602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sidjabat-Tambunan, H., and J. C. Bensik. 1997. Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli from the faeces of sheep, calves and pigs. Aust. Vet. J. 4:292-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sperandio, V., J. B. Kaper, M. R. Bortolini, B. C. Neves, R. Keller, and L. R. Trabulsi. 1998. Characterization of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) in different enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serotypes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 164:133-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tarr, C. L., and T. S. Whittam. 2002. Molecular evolution of the intimin gene in O111 clones of pathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184:479-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Unkmeir, A., and H. Schmidt. 2000. Structural analysis of phage-borne stx genes and their flanking sequences in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Shigella dysenteriae type 1 strains. Infect. Immun. 68:4856-4864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vernozy-Rozand, C. V., M. P. Montet, F. Lequerrec, E. Serillon, B. Tilly, C. Bavai, S. Ray-Gueniot, J. Bouvet, C. Mazuy-Cruchaudet, and Y. Richard. 2002. Prevalence of verotoxin Escherichia coli (VTEC) in slurry, farmyard manure and sewage sludge in France. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93:473-478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang, G., T. Zhao, and M. P. Doyle. 1996. Fate of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2567-2570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weinstein, D. L., M. P. Jackson, J. E. Samuel, R. K. Holmes, and A. D. O'Brien. 1988. Cloning and sequencing of a Shiga-like toxin type II variant from Escherichia coli strain responsible for edema disease of swine. J. Bacteriol. 170:4223-4230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang, W. L., B. Kohler, E. Oswald, L. Beutin, H. Karch, S. Morabito, A. Caprioli, S. Suerbaum, and H. Schmidt. 2002. Genetic diversity of intimin genes of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4486-4492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES