Skip to main content
Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public Health logoLink to Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public Health
. 2013 Nov;72(11):380–385.

Hawai‘i's Multiethnic Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Are Their Health Behavior Risks Similar to State and National Samples?

Randal K Wada 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,, Darryl W Glaser 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Erin O'Carroll Bantum 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Trina Orimoto 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Alana D Steffen 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Jennifer L Elia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Cheryl L Albright 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
PMCID: PMC3831565  PMID: 24251083

Abstract

Due to toxicities associated with their malignancies and treatments, adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer (AYASCC) are at high risk for developing chronic diseases. This can be compounded by a greater prevalence of unhealthy behaviors relative to similarly aged non-cancer peers. Disparities in health behaviors have been noted for Black and Hispanic AYASCC, but data on Asian American (AA) or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI) minorities are lacking. The purpose of this study was to help bridge these information gaps by gathering data from Hawai‘i AA and NHOPI AYSCC. Telephone surveys were used to collect health behavior data from survivors 13–24 years of age (N=64); 55% of the sample was female, 77% AA or NHOPI, 63% leukemia/lymphoma survivors, and 32% overweight/obese. These were compared to state/national survey data for similarly aged individuals (Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System data for 13–17 year olds, and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data for 18–24 year olds). While Hawai‘i AYASCC had significantly lower rates of tobacco/alcohol use, a higher proportion did not eat five fruits/vegetables a day (96%) compared to state (83%) and national (78%) samples (P < .001). Although many met age-specific physical activity recommendations, 44% of <18 year olds and 29% of ≥18 year olds still failed to meet national guidelines. Low intake of fruits/vegetables and suboptimal levels of physical activity place these vulnerable, ethnic minority cancer survivors at higher risk for chronic disease. These findings underscore the need to assess and advise survivors about their diet and exercise habits as part of post-treatment care.

Keywords: Childhood cancer survivors, Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Nutrition, Physical activity

Introduction

Due to advances in therapy over the last 30 years, five-year survival rates for children afflicted with cancer are high (70% – 80%), and these rates are sustained for up to 20 years after diagnosis.1,2 Thus, the majority of pediatric cancer patients are likely to live many years after their therapy ends. However, due to the added burden of toxicities associated with their primary malignancies and treatments,35 adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer (AYASCC) are at increased risk for development of chronic diseases relative to the general population.6

While a healthy lifestyle can mitigate the severity of these problems, results from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and the Children's Oncology Group (COG) revealed a disconcertingly high incidence of tobacco and alcohol use as well as physical inactivity among AYASCC.711 The CCSS reports are from a multi-institutional (N = 26 institutions) study of children (less than 21 years of age) who survived 5 years or more after being treated between 1970–1986 for specific types of cancer including leukemia, brain tumor, Hodgkins lymphoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, etc.12 A detailed description of eligibility and survey methods used in the CCSS cohort is available elsewhere.1214 The COG is a NCI funded clinical trials group devoted to childhood and adolescent cancer research conducted at over 200 children's hospitals, universities, and cancer centers across the United States and in foreign countries.10,15,16 A study investigating the high risk behaviors of 117 childhood survivors of leukemia, previously treated in COG trials but who are currently young adults, found that 22% percent had smoked cigarettes in the last 30 days and 25% reported binge drinking in the last month.10 A 2009 study by Tai and colleagues identified survivors of childhood cancer who participated, as adults, in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, and found that the childhood cancer survivors had significantly higher rates of smoking, obesity, heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes compared to respondents with no history of cancer.6 A recent COG study of adult survivors of childhood cancer found they had high prevalence rates for adverse health outcomes related to pulmonary, auditory, reproductive, cardiac, and neurocognitive disorders/abnormal function.17 Another recent single institution study showed that adolescents and young adult survivors reported significantly poorer health related quality of life than both the general population and those diagnosed at an earlier age. In addition, a significant proportion also failed to meet national recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake (76%), energy from fat (39%), fiber intake (96%), and physical activity (65%).18 It is therefore disconcerting that although most childhood cancer survivors receive post-therapy medical care, only 18% of these encounters involved discussion of risk-based screening or counseling on behavioral changes to reduce risk.11,19 Nevertheless, data indicate that survivors in the most at-risk subgroups are generally more interested in participating in diet and physical activity interventions, suggesting the benefit of future research to develop interventions in these areas.18

Disparities in health behaviors exist by race/ethnicity among AYASCC. The (2003) CCSS survey found that more AYASCC black survivors, compared to white, Hispanic or “other races/ethnicities,” were not meeting national guidelines for physical activity.7 There is a lack of granularity with respect to these “other races/ ethnicities,” including Asian Americans (AA), Native Hawaiians, and Other Pacific Islanders (NHOPI), where cultural or social factors can contribute significantly to health behaviors. For example, Lowry and colleagues combined the data from four nationally representative samples of United States high school students surveyed in the 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). They found that AA were significantly less likely than black, Hispanic, or white students to have drunk alcohol, used marijuana, or be currently sexually active; while NHOPI were much more likely than other ethnic groups to have contemplated suicide.20 However, due to low numbers of AA and NHOPI in the CCSS national cohort study of AYASCC, their data are listed under the “other” race/ethnicity category and are not typically included in the statistical analyses for ethnic minorities. Thus, most of our current understanding has been gleaned from analyses of largely Caucasian populations, and there is practically nothing published about the prevalence of adverse health behaviors among AYASCC of AA or NHOPI ancestry.7,18,21,22

This study was undertaken to help bridge information gaps about AA and NHOPI AYASCC in Hawai‘i, specifically to see if they had a higher prevalence of selected adverse health behaviors than similarly aged representative samples from Hawai‘i and across the United States.6,9,11,23

Methods

Study Design

This study was a cross-sectional telephone survey of AYASCC from a children's cancer clinic on O‘ahu, and all surveys and protocols were approved by the institutional review board of Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women and Children (KMCWC; RP#07-006-1HPH2).

Eligibility and Enrollment

AYASCC patients who were diagnosed and treated from 1983 to 2008 at KMCWC and were between the ages of 13–24 years at the time the study was conducted, at least one month post-treatment, and could speak English were eligible. KMCWC providers at the cancer clinic pre-screened potentially eligible AYASCC and removed those patients who were currently in treatment, had moved or lived out of state, died, or who were still recovering from recent cancer therapy. The telephone surveys were conducted from 2007–2008. Parents of potentially eligible patients were mailed a recruitment letter along with a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) consent and assent forms granting permission to access information in the patient's medical records and to participate in a telephone survey. A “do not contact” postcard was also included for uninterested parents or patients. Research staff called non-responders two weeks after the mailing to assess their interest in the study.

Data Collection

Different age-specific surveys for AYASCC < 18 years old and ≥ 18 years old were used to assess health behaviors: the YRBSS for high school students, and the BRFSS for adults > 18 years of age.24,25 Only selected questions on alcohol and tobacco use, physical activity, and fruit/vegetable intake were administered, as opposed to the entire YRBSS or BRFSS surveys. Verbatim questions from the YRBSS were slightly modified for administration via a telephone interview, so as to maintain the privacy of the youth answering at home (eg, questions were read to the respondent but there were no probing or follow-up questions, nor insistence on a reply, ie, respondents could answer “don't know” or “prefer not to answer”). The BRFSS and YRBSS questions used in this study are available, on request, from the first author.

Comparison Samples

Age-matched results from our sample were compared to state-wide and national surveys (for YRBSS < 18 years and BRFSS for ≥ 18 years). We downloaded (using the CDC online tool) United States and Hawai‘i YRBSS (high school) prevalence data for a specific question and compared it to our < 18 years old AYASCC sample's percentages. We used a similar online tool to download the prevalence data for 18–24 year old adults who completed the United States and Hawai‘i BRFSS, and compared their prevalence data to our 18–24 year old AYASCC.26,27 Data from the 2005 or 2007 national surveys were used if available; otherwise data from the most recent previous year were used and noted in the results. Our sample of <18 year old survivors had a proportion of AA and NHOPI (70%) that was comparable to the 2007 Hawai‘i YRBSS sample of 79% AA or NHOPI described in analyses conducted by Eaton and colleagues.28

Statistical Methods

Statistical analyses were done using SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Comparisons with state, national, and other research data were conducted using Chi-square analyses, Fisher's exact tests, t-tests, and two proportion z-tests.29

Results

Patient Characteristics

Of the 332 patients diagnosed from 1983–2008 who were between 13 and 24 years at the time of the study, 215 patients (64.8%) were potentially eligible and sent recruitment letters. Very few (4%) returned the “do not contact” postcard. One-fifth (20%) of the letters were returned undeliverable, and 3% were determined to be ineligible during follow-up contacts. No response was provided by 43%. Thus, the positive response rate was 29.8% (64 of 215 contacted). There was no difference between the proportion of respondents versus non respondents by age group (< 18 or ≥ 18 years old). Regardless of age, females were significantly more likely to participate than males (40.9% vs 22.8%, P = .006). There were no significant differences between the proportion of respondents versus non-respondents by race (white versus non-white) or cancer diagnosis. The total sample (Table 1) had a mean age of 18.9 ± 3.4 years, and 36% of the sample was < 18 years, with 19% white, 47% AA, 30% NHOPI, 2% African American, and 3% other. Most had leukemia or lymphoma, with an average of 9.1 ± 5.3 years since diagnosis, and many (66%) used state or federal insurance. About a third (32%) of the total sample was classified as overweight or obese according to age-specific criteria.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Adolescent and Young Adults Survivors of Childhood Cancer in Hawai‘i

Total Sample <18 years ≥18 years
Total N 64 23 41
Mean Age (years ± S.D.) 18.9 ± 3.4 15.3 ± 1.5 20.9 ± 2.3
Age Range (years) 13–24 13–17 18–24
Gender n (%)
Female 35 (55) 13 (57) 22 (54)
Male 29 (45) 10 (44) 19 (46)
Ethnicity n (%)
Hispanic 10 (16) 5 (23) 5 (12)
Non-Hispanic 54 (84) 18 (78) 36 (88)
Race n (%)
Asian 30 (47) 11 (47) 19 (46)
White 12 (19) 7 (30) 5 (12)
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 19 (30) 5 (22) 14 (34)
African-American 1 (2) 0 (0) 1 (2)
Other 2 (3) 0 (0) 2 (5)
Cancer diagnosis* n (%)
Leukemia, Lymphoma 40 (64) 15 (68) 25 (61)
Brain tumor 6 (10) 1 (5) 5 (12)
Solid tumor (extracranial) 16 (25) 5 (23) 11 (27)
Other 1 (2) 1 (5) 0 (0)
Time since diagnosis (years ± S.D.)* 9.1 ± 5.3 7.6 ± 3.4 9.9 ± 6.0
Body Mass Index (BMI kg/m2)* 23.9 ± 5.4 22.4 ± 5.0 24.7 ± 5.5
*

One cancer Dx, one time since diagnosis, and one BMI were missing

Health Risk Behaviors

The AYASCC < 18 (13–17 years old) reported fewer risk behaviors than the YRBS samples from both Hawai‘i and nationwide (see Table 2).28,30,31 Only one (4%) AYASCC had ever tried smoking, compared to 67.2% and 50.3% of the state and national YRBS samples, respectively. Likewise, alcohol consumption rates were lower among AYASCC, with only 9% reporting that they had ever drunk alcohol compared to 58.7% of the Hawai‘i and 75% of United States YRBSS samples. All of these comparisons were statistically significant, with P-values < .001. AYASCC < age 18 were more likely to be physically active than the state and United States YRBSS samples < 18 years of age. However, nearly all AYASCC (96%) ate fruit/vegetable fewer than 5 times per day, compared to 82.8% in the Hawai‘i and 78.6% national YRBS samples (P < .001 for both). Results for AYASCC > 18 (18–24 years) are shown in Table 3. Relative to respondents to the BRFSS national survey, they were significantly less likely to have smoked ≥ 100 cigarettes in their entire life, to be a current smoker, and to have had a drink in the past 30 days. A larger proportion (78%) reported eating fruit/vegetables less than 5 times per day compared to the state and national BRFSS samples (73.1% and 73.4%, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Our ≥ 18 years old sample was more likely to meet physical activity recommendations. Only 29% did not meet the recommendations (ie, ≥ 150 minutes per week of moderate to vigorous aerobic physical activity32), compared to 41.1% in the state (P = .003) and 45.1% nationally (P < .001).

Table 2.

Behavoral Risk Factors among AYASCC 13–17 Years and similarly aged Hawai‘i/National representative samples

13–17 Yrs AYASCC Sample (n=23) High School YRBS Hawai‘i (n=1,191) P-value* High School YRBS United States (n=13,840) P-value**
Tobacco Use
Ever tried cigarette smoking 4 % 67.2% < .001 50.3% < .001
Smoked a cigarette in last 30 days 0.0% 27.9% < .001 20.0% < .001
Alcohol Use
Ever had a drink of alcohol 9% 58.7% < .001 75.0% < .001
Had 1 drink in last 30 days 4 % 29.1% < .001 44.7% < .001
Nutrition
Did not eat = 5 fruits/vegetables per day 96% 82.8% < .001 78.6% < .001
Physical Activity
Not Active = 60 min/day for ≥ 5 days in last week 44% 65.7% < .001 65.3% < .001
Did not play on sports team in past 12 mo 52 % 45.4% .052 43.7% .013
*

Comparison of sample to state YRBS data;

**

Comparison of sample to national YRBS data;

Data from 1999 YRBS

Table 3.

Behavioral Risk Factors among AYASCC 18–24 Years and similarly aged Hawai‘i/National representative samples

18–24 Years AYASCC Sample (n=41) 18–24 years BRFSS Hawai‘i (n=319) P-value* 18–24 years BRFSS United States (n=15,396) P-value**
Tobacco Use
Smoked ≥100 cigarettes in entire life 21 % 32.4% 0.004 31.5% 0.004
Current smoker 0% 66.9% <0. 001 75.6% <0. 001
Alcohol Use
Had 1 drink in last 30 days 44% 52.6% 0.009 52.2% 0.004
Average drinks per drinking day† † 4.88 4.29 0.66 3.84 0.514
Nutrition
Did not eat ≥5 fruits/vegetables per day 78 % 73.1% 0.105 73.4% 0.086
Physical Activity
Did not meet recommendations for physical activity (ie, > 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week) 29 % 41.1% <0. 001 45.1% <0. 001
*

Comparison of sample to state BRFSS data;

**

Comparison of sample to national BRFSS data;

Now smoke every day or some days, of those who have smoked ≥100 cigarettes in entire life;

† †

Of those who drank in last 30 days.

Discussion

This study is the first to examine multiple health risk behaviors in a sample of primarily AA and NHOPI AYASCC. KMCWC is the only hospital in Hawai‘i that delivers comprehensive care for children with cancer. Its clinic was well suited for our investigation due to the large percentage of AA and NHOPI in Hawai‘i.

Our results indicate that our sample of largely AA and NHOPI < 18 years AYASCC had significantly lower rates of tobacco and alcohol use compared to state and national data, regardless of race, and when compared to YRBSS rates reported for AA and Pacific Islander high school students (data combined across four years).20 The ≥ 18 year old sample was less likely to have smoked in their entire life or be a current smoker than both state and national samples (P-values < .001). More Hawai‘i AYASCC met national guidelines for physical activity compared to their peers, although many (44% < 18 years and 29% ≥ 18 years) still failed to meet their national age-specific guidelines. A significantly higher proportion of AYASCC ate fewer than 5 fruits/vegetables a day.

Direct comparisons with previously published studies are difficult due to differences in sample sizes, survey methodology, and patient characteristics. However, our results appear consistent with previous CCSS findings with respect to smoking in ethnic minority (Hispanic and Black) adult survivors of childhood cancer.21 Also, our >18 year old AYASCC sample had much lower smoking rates than similarly aged AYASCC in two large studies- the CCSS and COG.10,11 Reported drinking rates were significantly lower among both of our AYASCC samples compared to BRFSS data from national samples and previous AYASCC samples.10,21 The levels of inactivity in the Hawai‘i AYASCC were comparable to several previous findings for AYASCC,7,11 but not as high as the 70–80% rates of inactivity reported in other studies.33,34 Thus, for several behavioral risk factors, including tobacco, alcohol, and physical activity, the risks in our largely AA and NHOPI sample of AYASCC were lower than risks for their similarly aged non-cancer peers in Hawai‘i, across the United States, and the largely white AYASCC samples in previously published reports.

It should be emphasized that an overwhelming majority of both our < 18 year old and ≥ 18 year old AYASCC did not meet national guidelines for eating fruit and vegetables five times a day. The 96% non-compliance rate seen in our < 18 year olds was higher than previously reported (75.6%) for AYASCC pre-adolescents,35 and was significantly higher than the state or national rates for this age group. Insufficient fruit/vegetable intake for our ≥ 18 year old AYASCC was no different from state and national averages, and was similar to the amounts (76% and 79%) in previous evaluations of the dietary practices of AYASCC.18,36

There are numerous influences that shape adolescents' food choices, particularly for fruits and vegetables, including genetic, social, cultural, media/marketing, and physical environmental factors.37,38 It is difficult to pinpoint why so many of our adolescent AYASCC in Hawai‘i failed to meet national recommendations with regard to diet, particularly in light of their levels of physical activity, since both healthy and unhealthy behaviors tend to cluster together.39,40 It could possibly reflect residual influences resulting from a required avoidance of some fruits and vegetables during cancer treatments undergone during developmental phases (6–10 years of age) when taste preferences are formed or solidified.41,42 Although our data is cross-sectional, since AYASCC ≥ 18 years had a higher consumption of fruits/vegetables, perhaps it is because AYASCC eventually increase their consumption as they grow up, and their intake then becomes more comparable to the US average for adults. The instruments used to measure fruit and vegetable intake in the YRBSS / BRFSS collected the number of occasions or times per day a fruit or vegetable was eaten (ie, serving sizes were not described or reported), and so this method may underestimate the intake of some foods. For example, a large green salad could represent three or more servings of vegetables, but using the YRBSS method it would only count as one occasion or time per day when a vegetable was eaten.

Study Limitations

Although it was comparable to some other studies of childhood cancer survivors, a possible limitation of our study was its 29.8% response rate and the resulting small sample size. One survey of young adult cancer survivors recruited from cancer organizations (aged 18–40 years) had a lower response rate of 14.7%,43 while other surveys of adolescent and adult cancer survivors identified through medical records and registries had similar response rates of 33%–38%.4446 Another potential limitation is social desirability, or a tendency to answer questions in ways subjects thought were more acceptable. The study's sample size precluded analyses based on time from diagnosis, cancer type, or gender and race comparisons. Thus, we aggregated data from the diverse race/ethnic groups that comprise our AA and NHOPI survivors, which is unfortunate since research with healthy teens has found differences in the prevalence of health behaviors across these ethnicities/races.20,47,48 For example, our results for a combined sample of AA and NHOPI cancer survivors could mask substantial differences in high risk behaviors between populations with very different social and cultural backgrounds, as was found in national YRBSS data where healthy Pacific Islander teens had significantly higher rates of smoking and alcohol use, compared to Asian teens.20 Finally, our sample combined middle school and high school aged survivors, while the YRBSS representative samples differentiate between these two age groups. The YRBSS is also only conducted in public schools across the United States, and we did not ask our survivors if they went to public or private school. However, the majority of our AYASCC were from families that used state or federal-funded insurance; thus, our respondents may have been more likely to have attended public schools. These factors including the differences in our survey methodologies, especially the telephone survey we used for < 18 year old survivors, affect the generalizability of our findings, particularly with respect to the health behaviors of specific race/ethnic subgroups within AA and NHOPI adolescent/young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Implications

These results reveal a need for AYASCC survivors to have a better appreciation of the late effects of their cancer therapies, including an increased risk for chronic diseases. Intake of fruits and vegetables and physical activity are behaviors that have been identified as opportunities for improvement in AYASCC.49 Previous research by others indicates that AYASCC with a higher level of readiness to make a change in physical activity were more motivated and had fewer barriers to increasing their physical activity.18,33 These results and those from the published literature raise several important questions that could be addressed in future research projects. Differences in health behavioral risk factors based on medical issues (ie, time since cancer diagnosis), cancer diagnosis, race/ethnicity, level of motivation to make a change in a risky behavior, and psychosocial factors could be pursued in future investigations of AYASCC. Also, research might be proposed to test the design and evaluation of a clinical management system (linked to or delivered via an electronic medical records program) that would assess AYASCC's motivation to change a health behavior and also facilitate appropriate physician-based advice to decrease lifestyle risks tailored to that level of motivation.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following pediatric oncologists and advanced practice nurses from the Blood and Cancer Clinic at Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women and Children: Carol Kotsubo MSN; DeeAnn Omatsu PNP; Robert Wilkinson MD; Wade Kyono MD; Desiree Medeiros MD; and Kelly Woodruff MD. The authors would also like to thank Dr. David O'Riordan for his initial contributions to this project. This study was supported, in part, by funds provided through the University of Hawai‘i Cancer Center from a National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Programs Grant (P30CA071789; C. Vogel - PI).

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors identify a conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group, author. Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2006. NIH 06-6067. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kohler BA, Ward E, McCarthy BJ, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2007, Featuring Tumors of the Brain and Other Nervous System. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 31; doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Han JW, Kwon SY, Won SC, Shin YJ, Ko JH, Lyu CJ. Comprehensive clinical follow-up of late effects in childhood cancer survivors shows the need for early and well-timed intervention. Ann Oncol. 2009 Jul;20(7):1170–1177. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schmidt D, Anderson L, Bingen K, Hoag J, Kupst MJ, Warwick AB. Late effects in adult survivors of childhood cancer: considerations for the general practitioner. West J Med. 2010 Apr;109(2):98–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yeh JM, Nekhlyudov L, Goldie SJ, Mertens AC, Diller L. A model-based estimate of cumulative excess mortality in survivors of childhood cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 6;152(7):409–417. W131–W408. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tai E, Buchanan N, Townsend J, Fairley T, Moore A, Richardson LC. Health status of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012 Jun 11; doi: 10.1002/cncr.27445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ness KK, Leisenring WM, Huang S, et al. Predictors of inactive lifestyle among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer. 2009 May 1;115(9):1984–1994. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Butterfield RM, Park ER, Puleo E, et al. Multiple risk behaviors among smokers in the childhood cancer survivors study cohort. Psychooncology. 2004 Sep;13(9):619–629. doi: 10.1002/pon.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kahalley LS, Robinson LA, Tyc VL, et al. Risk factors for smoking among adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Mar;58(3):428–434. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schultz KA, Chen L, Chen Z, Zeltzer LK, Nicholson HS, Neglia JP. Health and risk behaviors in survivors of childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;55(1):157–164. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nathan PC, Ford JS, Henderson TO, et al. Health Behaviors, Medical Care, and Interventions to Promote Healthy Living in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 2;27(14):2363–2373. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD, et al. Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002 Apr;38(4):229–239. doi: 10.1002/mpo.1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Boice JD, et al. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a National Cancer Institute-supported resource for outcome and intervention research. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 10;27(14):2308–2318. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mertens AC, Walls RS, Taylor L, et al. Characteristics of childhood cancer survivors predicted their successful tracing. J Clin Epi. 2004;57(9):933–944. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Group. CsO, author. The World's childhood cancer experts. 2013. http://www.childrensoncologygroup.org/
  • 16.Landier W, Leonard M, Ruccione KS. Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: nursing discipline. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Jun;60(6):1031–1036. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hudson MM, Ness KK, Gurney JG, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA. 2013 Jun 12;309(22):2371–2381. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Badr H, Chandra J, Paxton RJ, et al. Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Jun 8; doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0289-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stolley MR, Restrepo J, Sharp LK. Diet and physical activity in childhood cancer survivors: a review of the literature. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Jun;39(3):232–249. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9192-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lowry R, Eaton DK, Brener ND, Kann L. Prevalence of health-risk behaviors among Asian American and Pacific Islander high school students in the U.S., 2001–2007. Public Health Rep. 2011 Jan-Feb;126(1):39–49. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Castellino SM, Casillas J, Hudson MM, et al. Minority adult survivors of childhood cancer: a comparison of long-term outcomes, health care utilization, and health-related behaviors from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 20;23(27):6499–6507. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tyc VL, Lensing S, Klosky J, Rai SN, Robinson L. A comparison of tobacco-related risk factors between adolescents with and without cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 Jun;30(4):359–370. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Phillips-Salimi CR, Lommel K, Andrykowski MA. Physical and mental health status and health behaviors of childhood cancer survivors: findings from the 2009 BRFSS survey. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jun;58(6):964–970. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion DoAaSH, author. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) YRBSS. 2011. [July 23, 2011]. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/yrbs/index.htm.
  • 25.Services. USDoHaH, author. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Turning information into health. BRFSS. 2011. [July 23, 2011]. http://www.cdc.gov/BRFSS/
  • 26.United States Department of Health and Human Services, author. 1991–2011 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data. Youth Online: High School YRBS. 2013. [June 24, 2013]. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/App/Default.
  • 27.United States Department of Health and Human Services, author. Prevalence Data and Data Analysis Tools. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2013. [June 24, 2013]. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_tools.htm.
  • 28.Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2008;57(SS04):1–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Youth Online: High School YRBS Hawaii 2007 and United States 2007 Results. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. [July 23, 2011]. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/App/Default.aspx?SID=HS.
  • 31.The Hawaii Health Data Warehouse, author. Perceived and actual overweight/obesity by school type, state, gender, grade level, DOH race-ethnicity, for the year(s) - 2011, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009. 2010. [July 23, 2011]. http://www.hhdw.org/cms/index.php?page=weight-control.
  • 32.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, author. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2008. [June 17, 2013]. http://www.health.gov/paguidelines.
  • 33.Finnegan L, Wilkie DJ, Wilbur J, Campbell RT, Zong S, Katula S. Correlates of physical activity in young adult survivors of childhood cancers. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Sep;34(5):E60–E69. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.E60-E69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Keats MR, Culos-Reed SN, Courneya KS, McBride M. An examination of physical activity behaviors in a sample of adolescent cancer survivors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;23(3):135–142. doi: 10.1177/1043454206287304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM. Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5814–5830. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reeves M, Eakin E, Lawler S, Demark-Wahnefried W. Health behaviours in survivors of childhood cancer. Aust Fam Physician. 2007 Jan-Feb;36(1–2):95–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kalavana TV, Maes S, De Gucht V. Interpersonal and self-regulation determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behavior in adolescents. J Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):44–52. doi: 10.1177/1359105309345168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Blanchette L, Brug J. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among 6-12-year-old children and effective interventions to increase consumption. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005 Dec;18(6):431–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ranjit N, Evans MH, Byrd-Williams C, Evans AE, Hoelscher DM. Dietary and activity correlates of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among adolescents. Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):e754–e761. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pearson N, Biddle SJ. Sedentary behavior and dietary intake in children, adolescents, and adults. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):178–188. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liem DG, Zandstra L, Thomas A. Prediction of children's flavour preferences. Effect of age and stability in reported preferences. Appetite. 2010 Aug;55(1):69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brug J, Tak NI, te Velde SJ, Bere E, de Bourdeaudhuij I. Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(Suppl. 1):S7–S14. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508892458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rabin C, Politi M. Need for health behavior interventions for young adult cancer survivors. Am J Health Behav. 2010 Jan-Feb;34(1):70–76. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.34.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carey ML, Clinton-McHarg T, Sanson-Fisher RW, Shakeshaft A. Development of cancer needs questionnaire for parents and carers of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2011 May 1; doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zebrack BJ, Yi J, Petersen L, Ganz PA. The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psychooncology. 2008 Sep;17(9):891–900. doi: 10.1002/pon.1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Belanger LJ, Plotnikoff RC, Clark A, Courneya KS. A survey of physical activity programming and counseling preferences in young-adult cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jan;35(1):48–54. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318210220a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mampilly CM, Yore MM, Maddock JE, Nigg CR, Buchner D, Heath GW. Prevalence of physical activity levels by ethnicity among adults in Hawaii, BRFSS 2001. Hawaii Med J. 2005 Oct;64(10):270, 272–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Madan A, Archambeau OG, Milsom VA, et al. More than Black and White: Differences in Predictors of Obesity among Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders and European Americans. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20(6):1325–1328. doi: 10.1038/oby.2012.15. 2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.AAP Section on Hematology/Oncology Children's Oncology Group, author. Long-term follow-up care for pediatric cancer survivors. Pediatrics. 2009 Mar;123(3):906–915. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public Health are provided here courtesy of University Health Partners of Hawaii

RESOURCES