Skip to main content
NCBI home page
MicrobiologyOpen logoLink to MicrobiologyOpen
. 2013 Aug 29;2(5):862–872. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.119

Exploration of Deinococcus-Thermus molecular diversity by novel group-specific PCR primers

Nicolas Theodorakopoulos 1,2,3,4, Dipankar Bachar 5,6, Richard Christen 5,6, Karine Alain 7, Virginie Chapon 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3831646  PMID: 23996915

Abstract

The deeply branching Deinococcus-Thermus lineage is recognized as one of the most extremophilic phylum of bacteria. In previous studies, the presence of Deinococcus-related bacteria in the hot arid Tunisian desert of Tataouine was demonstrated through combined molecular and culture-based approaches. Similarly, Thermus-related bacteria have been detected in Tunisian geothermal springs. The present work was conducted to explore the molecular diversity within the Deinococcus-Thermus phylum in these extreme environments. A set of specific primers was designed in silico on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, validated for the specific detection of reference strains, and used for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of metagenomic DNA retrieved from the Tataouine desert sand and Tunisian hot spring water samples. These analyses have revealed the presence of previously undescribed Deinococcus-Thermus bacterial sequences within these extreme environments. The primers designed in this study thus represent a powerful tool for the rapid detection of Deinococcus-Thermus in environmental samples and could also be applicable to clarify the biogeography of the Deinococcus-Thermus phylum.

Keywords: Deinococcus-Thermus, group-specific primers, molecular diversity

Introduction

The phylum Deinococcus-Thermus is currently divided into the orders Deinococcales and Thermales. While the order Thermales encompasses five genera (Thermus, Meiothermus, Marinithermus, Oceanithermus, and Vulcanithermus), the order Deinococcales is composed of three genera (Deinococcus, Deinobacterium, and Truepera). Deinococcus-Thermus is recognized as one of the most extremophilic phylum of bacteria. Cultured representatives of Thermus are either thermophilic or hyperthermophilic (Brock and Freeze 1969; Bjornsdottir et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2010; Vajna et al. 2012), while Deinococcus strains exhibit resistance to extreme ionizing and ultraviolet radiations, desiccation, and other DNA damaging conditions (Rainey et al. 1997; Albuquerque et al. 2005; Cox and Battista 2005; Slade and Radman 2011). As these microorganisms or their cellular components are of biotechnological interest with potential applications in bioremediation or molecular biology (e.g., thermostable enzymes), much research has been focused on this particular group of prokaryotes. Deinococcales members have been isolated from a wide range of natural environments such as arid soils (Hirsch et al. 2004; de Groot et al. 2005; Rainey et al. 2005, 2007; Chanal et al. 2006; Callegan et al. 2008; Yuan et al. 2009), radioactive sites (Asker et al. 2011), nuclear waste contaminated sediments (Fredrickson et al. 2004), air (Yoo et al. 2010), water (Im et al. 2008; Kämpfer et al. 2008), and the human gut (Lagier et al. 2012); they have also been isolated from a paper mill (Ekman et al. 2011). Thermales members have been recovered from a large set of natural and artificial thermal environments (Oshima and Imahori 1974; da Costa et al. 2006; Vajna et al. 2012; Yu et al. 2012), highlighting the exceptional adaptive abilities of these bacteria. In addition, Deinococcus-Thermus-related sequences have been detected by molecular tools in a huge range of biotopes, where they generally represent minor taxa (Janssen 2006).

In previous molecular diversity inventories, we have demonstrated the presence of Deinococcus taxa in the desert sands of Tataouine, Tunisia (Chanal et al. 2006), as well as the presence of Thermus taxa in Tunisian geothermal springs (Sayeh et al. 2010). However, the 16S rDNA clone libraries constructed from these studies are insufficient for a thorough exploration of Deinococcus-Thermus diversity. Indeed, sequences belonging to these taxa represent less than 2% of the overall community detected in Tataouine, and less than 10% of the overall revealed community in the Tunisian hot springs. An alternative approach to investigate the diversity of a taxonomic group in greater detail is to use group-specific primers specifically targeting a given taxon. This has been a successful strategy for the detection of diverse groups of Bacteria and Archaea at different taxonomic levels, including Actinobacteria (Stach et al. 2003); Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, α-, β-, and γ-proteobacteria (Mühling et al. 2008); Korarchaeota (Auchtung et al. 2011); Acidobacteria (Lee and Cho 2011; Gans et al. 2012); Pseudomonas (Widmer et al. 1998); and Francisella (Duodu et al. 2012). Furthermore, a specific primer for hemi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that targets the genus Deinococcus has recently been described (Chaturvedi and Archana 2012).

Here, we have developed specific PCR primers that target the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the entire Deinococcus-Thermus phylum. Following the initial in silico design step, primers specificity was tested with a collection of reference strains. Finally, we constructed 16S rDNA clone libraries to validate the use of these primers with environmental DNA. This approach has enabled us to detect novel representatives of Deinococcus and Thermus in desert sand samples from Tataouine, as well as in Tunisian geothermal spring water.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains, culture conditions, and genomic DNA purification

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Biomass for the genomic DNA extraction was prepared by growing Deinococcus isolates in TGY medium (0.5% tryptone, 0.1% glucose, 0.3% yeast extract) at 30°C; Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were cultivated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl) at 37°C; Shewanella oneidensis was grown in LB medium at 30°C; all other isolates were grown in 0.1× Tryptic Soy Broth (DIFCO laboratories, Detroit, MI) at 30°C. Bacteria were harvested by 5 min centrifugation at 10000g, and DNA extractions were performed on the cell pellet with the DNeasy® Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturer's instructions. Magnetospirillum magneticum genomic DNA was provided by J. B. Rioux (IBEB-LBC-CEA Cadarache, France).

Table 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Bacterial strains Description, origin, reference number Reference or source
α-proteobacteria
 Rhodobacter sphaeroïdes 2.4.1 Type strain (ATCC 11167) M. Sabaty, CEA Cadarache, France
 Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1 Type strain (ATCC 700264) J. B. Rioux, CEA Cadarache, France
 Afipia sp. CYB52 Arsenic contaminated water, Bangladesh Lab. collection
 Brevundimonas sp. OVA 3.2 Soil, Gabon Lab. collection
 Chelatococcus sp. VCT108 Tataouine desert sand, Tunisia Chanal et al. (2006)
β-proteobacteria
 Variovorax sp. Cu5 Uranium ores, France Lab. collection
 Burkholderia sp. VeU10 Uranium ores, France Lab. collection
 Collimonas sp. Ve03a1 ou VeU15 Uranium ores, France Lab. collection
γ-proteobacteria
 Escherichia coli MG1655 Type strain (ATCC 700926) Lab. Collection
 Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Type strain (ATCC BAA-47™) R. Voulhoux, CNRS, France
 Shewanella oneidensis MR1 Type strain (ATCC BAA-1096™) A. Verméglio, CEA Cadarache, France
Deinococcus-Thermus
 Deinococcus radiodurans R1 Type strain (ATCC 13939) S. Sommer, Univ. Of Paris-Sud, France
 Deinococcus desertii VCD115 Type strain (DSM 17065) de Groot et al. (2005)
 Deinococcus desertii VCD117 Sahara desert, reference strain de Groot et al. (2005)
 Deinococcus sp. VCT102 Tataouine desert sand, Tunisia Chanal et al. (2006)
 Deinococcus proteolyticus MRP Feces of Lama glam, type strain (ATCC 35074) Kobatake et al. (1973); Brooks and Murray (1981)
 Deinococcus radiopugnans MIT 248 Irradiated haddock, type strain (ATCC 19172) Brooks and Murray (1981)
 Deinococcus murrayi ALT-1b Hot springs, type strain (DSM 11303) Ferreira et al. (1997)
 Deinococcus geothermalis AG-3a Hot springs, type strain (DSM 11300) Ferreira et al. (1997)
 Deinococcus indicus Wt/1a Arsenic polluted water, type strain (DSM 15307) Suresh et al. (2004)
 Deinococcus radiophilus RBD Irradiated Bombay duck, type strain (DSM 20551) Lewis (1973); Brooks and Murray (1981)
 Deinococcus grandis KS 0485 Hot springs, type strain (DSM 3963) Oyaizu et al. (1987); Rainey et al. (1997)
 Meiothermus ruber 21 Hot springs, type strain (DSM 1279) Loginova et al. (1984); Nobre et al. (1996)
 Thermus aquaticus YT-1 Hot springs, type strain (DSM 625) Brock and Freeze (1969)
 Thermus thermophilus HB8 Hot springs, type strain (DSM 579) Oshima and Imahori (1974); Manaia et al. (1994)
Firmicutes
 Lysinibacillus sp. Vi07 Granitic soil, France Lab. collection
 Paenibacillus sp. Vi0A7b Granitic soil, France Lab. collection
 Bacillus sp. ViU12 Uranium ores, France Lab. collection
Actinobacteria
 Corynebacterium sp. Vi06 Granitic soil, France Lab. collection
 Streptomyces sp. Vi02 Granitic soil, France Lab. collection
 Arthrobacter sp. ViUA5 Uranium ores, France Lab. collection
 Leifsonia sp. Ve03a2 Granitic soil, France Lab. collection
Bacteroïdetes
 Pedobacter sp. VeU6 Uranium ores, France Lab. collection
 Chryseobacterium sp. TchI_1_n3 Radionuclide-contaminated soil, Chernobyl Chapon et al. (2012)
 Hymenobacter sp. TchI_11_n5 Radionuclide-contaminated soil, Chernobyl Lab. collection
 Sphingobacterium sp. CYB21 Arsenic contaminated water, Bangladesh Lab. collection
Open in a new tab

Environmental DNA

Sample collection and environmental DNA extraction for the sample from the Tataouine desert (located ∼100 km west from the Sahara border; see Fig. 1) are reported in Chanal et al. (2006). Deinococcus have been detected therein by a combination of molecular and cultural methods. The present study was performed with purified DNA stored at −20°C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Location map of the study sites (triangles). For the hot springs, the water temperature is indicated in brackets. Genera belonging to the Deinococcus-Thermus phylum retrieved in each site are also indicated.

Five water samples from Tunisian geothermal springs, described in Sayeh et al. (2010), were examined in this study: Ain Essalhine (spring 5), Nefta (spring 7), Hammem Bouhlel (spring 9), El Hamma of Tozeur (spring 10), and Ain Atrous (spring 11) (see Fig. 1). Springs 5, 9, and 11 were chosen as control samples as Thermus sequences have been previously detected therein. Springs 7 and 10 were also examined to assess whether the use of specific primers is more sensitive than the cloning/sequencing approach, as no Deinococcus/Thermus were detected previously. Water samples (either 10 mL or 50 mL) were filtered through 0.2-μm pore size filters, which were then stored at −80°C. Environmental DNA was extracted directly from these filters in the present study, using the UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio, Solana, CA).

In silico design of Deinococcus-Thermus specific primers

All Deinococcus-Thermus sequences were extracted from the SILVA 111 reference sequences and aligned using the Muscle program. From this, a 90% sequence consensus was computed, and encoded using the IUPAC notation (without taking into account indels for consensus computing). A 15 nucleotide (nt) sliding window was used to extract each subsequence containing less than three degeneracies. The overlapping extracted 15 nt oligomers were then recombined into longer domains. Each possible primer with a length of 20–30 nts containing less than three degeneracies was then extracted from the domains.

A specific program, written in C, was developed to test which sequences would be recognized in the SILVA database, allowing up to three mismatches. Primers were then selected having a high specificity and a wide coverage for sequences of the Deinococcus-Thermus clade. A set of Python programs was used to improve their coverage while remaining specific. At the end of this process, the Deino-f-326-350/Deino-r-758-785 primers displayed good coverage and specificity, and we selected them for in vivo validation.

PCR amplification and construction of 16S rRNA gene libraries

For the in vitro validation of primers that specifically target Deinococcus-Thermus, an initial set of experiments was performed using phylogenetically diverse bacteria (Table 1). Genomic DNA from pure cultures was used as a template for PCR amplification with the primers Deino-f-326-350 (5′-CGGGAGGCAGCAGTTAGGAATCTTC-3′) and Deino-r-758-785 (5′-GTTTAGGGYGTGGACTACCCGGGTATCT-3′). Each amplification reaction mixture (50 μL) contained 1× PCR buffer, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L of each dNTP, 1 μmol/L of each primer, 1U Go Taq® Hot start polymerase (Promega), and 75 ng of DNA template. Based on the nucleotide content of the primers, the annealing temperature was predicted to be 64.5°C for Deino-f-326-350 and 65°C for Deino-r-758-785. However, when PCR amplification was performed with an annealing temperature of 65°C, all Deinococcus-Thermus strains DNAs were successfully amplified while no amplification was detected for strains belonging to any other phyla, with the exception of Firmicutes. Amplification of Firmicutes was predicted by in silico analysis, and can be accounted for by two primer/template mismatches. To avoid nonspecific amplification of Firmicutes, the PCR protocol was optimized by increasing the annealing temperature to 72°C. After an initial 2 min denaturation step at 94°C, 25 cycles were performed (94°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 1 min 45 sec), followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min.

In a second set of experiments, primer efficiency and specificity for environmental DNA were examined by nested PCR. First, community DNA were used as targets for PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA genes with the universal primers fD1/S17, as described in Chanal et al. (2006). This primer set recognized 39.6, 82, and 88.5% of the 139 eligible sequences of Deinococcus-Thermus by allowing, respectively, 0, 1, or 2 mismatches between primers and sequences. The PCR products were then purified and used as the targets in a second PCR amplification with the primers Deino-f-326-350/Deino-r-758-785. The resulting PCR products were purified, cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector (TOPO TA Cloning kit; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and electro-transformed into E. coli DH5α cells. Single colonies containing inserts were randomly selected and plasmids were extracted using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen), according to manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids were sent to GATC (Germany) for Sanger sequencing, using the M13F sequencing primer. Sequence quality was ensured manually with the BioEdit Version 7.0.5.3 (Hall 1999).

Phylogenetic analyses

To assign taxonomy, the SILVA 111 reference sequence database was downloaded and used to search each clone sequence using a Needleman–Wunsch algorithm, applying a 80% similarity cutoff to retrieve the 20 most similar sequences. Five clone sequences had no close relative in the SILVA database. These five sequences were then submitted to a Blastn query (excluding environmental sequences) using the NCBI nr database. First, we looked for hits with ≥99% similarity, and we calculated a consensus taxonomy. In the event that no hit was found with ≥99% similarity, the threshold was successively lowered in a step-wise fashion to determine at what level a taxonomy could be assigned. This process was repeated until an 80% threshold was reached. A consensus taxonomy corresponded, for example, to a defined genus if all selected hits shared the same genus.

For each of the 142 clone sequence, the two most similar sequences from the SILVA 111 reference database were selected (but with filtering to include at least one cultured bacterial sequence) to create a file of clone sequences and reference sequences (194 sequences in total). SeaView (Gouy et al. 2010) was used to align these sequences, using the included Muscle program. An initial tree was built from conserved domains, and sequences were reordered as they occurred in this tree using SeaView's tools. Alignments were checked and manually modified when necessary. This process was repeated until no problem was detected. Trees were built using Neighbor-Joining (with distances corrected using the Kimura 2-parameter method), as implemented in SeaView with 1000 bootstrap replications. Trees were plotted with TreeDyn (Chevenet et al. 2006). To determine OTUs (operational taxonomic units), sequences were pair-wise aligned by a Needleman–Wunsch algorithm, a distance matrix was computed and sequences were clustered by average linkage from 85% to 100% similarity. We used clustering with a similarity of 97% in this study.

Results and Discussion

In silico analysis of primer pair specificity and coverage

The Deino-f-326-350/Deino-r-758-785 primers exhibited high coverage and specificity for the phylum Deinococcus-Thermus (Table 2). By allowing 0, 1, or 2 mismatches between primers and sequences, the primer set, respectively, recognized 89, 95.7, and 97.2% of the 1048 sequences of Deinococcus-Thermus. The coverage values were high for all genera within the phylum except for Marinithermus.

Table 2.

In silico analysis of the coverage obtained by the set of primers

Total number of sequences 0 mismatch (%) 1 mismatch (%) 2 mismatches (%)
Deinococcus-Thermus 1048 89 95.7 97.2
Marinithermus 2 0 0 100
Meiothermus 201 88 95 97
Oceanithermus 15 100 100 100
Thermus 318 91 97 97
Vulcanithermus 3 67 67 100
Deinococcus 365 92 98 99
Truepera 132 80 89 92
Proteobacteria 222,804 <0.1 <0.1 0.3
Firmicutes 191,278 0 <0.1 25
Bacteroidetes 79,438 0 0 0.1
Actinobacteria 46,948 0 0 0.1
Acidobacteria 13,074 0 0 0.2
Cyanobacteria 12,752 0 0 0.1
Chloroflexi 10,437 0 0.9 2.4
Tenericutes 4234 0 0 7.8
Nitrospirae 2558 0 <0.1 1.6
Fusobacteria 2345 0 0 0.2
Deferribacteres 1671 0 0 1.6
Fibrobacteres 1116 0 0 0.1
Chlorobi 1101 0 0 3.3
Candidate division OD1 998 0 0 0.2
Aquificae 890 0.2 0.2 0.2
Thermotogae 770 0 0 0.1
Candidate division TM7 758 0 27.8 39.2
Armatimonadetes 660 0 0 1.4
BD1–5 396 0 7.6 69.9
TM6 373 0 0 4.6
TA06 310 0 0 0.3
Candidate division BRC1 265 0 0 0.8
RF3 231 0 0 4.3
Candidate division WS6 158 0 0 22.2
Candidate division KB1 78 0 0 12.8
Spirochetes 57 0 0 11.4
WCHB1–60 51 0 0 84.3
MVP-21 24 0 0 37.5
GAL08 17 0 0 5.9
Kazan-3B-28 13 0 0 15.4
Open in a new tab

The results for Deinococcus-Thermus are detailed according to the genera. The total number of sequences available in the database is indicated for each phylum and genera. The given coverage values correspond to 0, 1, or 2 mismatches between the primers and the 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Among the 731,338 sequences in the SILVA database, three (out of 222,804) Proteobacteria sequences and two (out of 890) Aquificae sequences matched exactly with the primers. Allowing one mismatch between primers and sequences increased the number of matches, to 211 sequences from Candidate division TM7 (27.8% coverage value), 89 sequences from Chloroflexi (0.9% coverage value), 30 sequences from BD1–5 (7.6% coverage value), and 10 sequences from Proteobacteria.

The coverage values increased for several phyla, when two mismatches were tolerated between primers and sequences. However, for member-rich phyla (e.g., Proteobacteria), the coverage values remained low (0.1–2.4%) except for Firmicutes (25%). Elevated coverage values were obtained for a number of small phyla, including Candidate Divisions TM7 (39.2%), WS6 (22.2%), and KB1 (12.8%); BD1–5 (69.9%), WCHB1–60 (84.3%), MVP-21 (37.5%), and Kazan-3B-28 (15.4).

In vitro validation of primers with reference strains

Tests for primer specificity and optimization of PCR amplification conditions were performed on a set of 36 bacterial strains comprising representatives from the bacterial phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Deinococcus-Thermus, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria (Table 1). When PCR amplification was performed with an annealing temperature of 72°C, Deinococcus and Thermus DNAs were successfully amplified, resulting in an expected amplicon size of 460 bp. No amplification was detected for strains belonging to any other phyla (Fig. S1).

Contribution of the Deino-f-326-350 and Deino-r-758-785 primers for the efficient detection of Deinococcus-Thermus in environmental DNA

To validate the use of Deino-f-326-350 and Deino-r-758-785 primers for environmental ecology applications, primer specificity was examined using six environmental community DNAs extracted from two distinct environments: the Tataouine desert sand and Tunisian geothermal springs. A direct PCR using the Deino-f-326-350 and Deino-r-758-785 primers with a 72°C annealing temperature did not yield any product with our six environmental DNA samples. This could be related to the high annealing temperature used here, in combination with low amount of Deinococcus-Thermus derived DNA and large quantity of nonspecific DNA in template DNA sample. Therefore, we performed a nested PCR protocol: the universal bacterial primers fD1 and S17 were used in a first round, and the resulting amplicons were targeted in the second round with the Deino-f-326-350 and Deino-r-758-785 primers (with an annealing temperature of 72°C). This protocol resulted in PCR products of the expected size for the six DNA samples tested.

Then, to check primer specificity, six gene libraries were constructed with the PCR products and 142 sequences were used for a phylogenetic analysis (Fig. S2); a simplified tree is shown in Figure 2. The sequences clustered into 33 OTUs at 97% sequence identity. The rarefaction curves plotted at this level did not reach an asymptote indicating that new OTUs would have appeared when increasing the number of clones sequenced (Fig. S3). One hundred twenty-four out of 142 sequences were affiliated with the targeted phylum Deinococcus-Thermus, whereas 18 sequences were affiliated with nontargeted phyla such as Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, and the Candidate Divisions KB1, TM7, and OD1. Among these 18 sequences, 15 displayed low similarity values (<93%) to known 16S rRNA gene sequences and three were related to Firmicutes; the latter suggests either amplification linked to primer mismatches (that could not be avoided even with an annealing temperature of 72°C) or PCR-induced artifacts. In spite of this, these nonspecific reactions occurred with a low frequency (13%) and did not prevent the detection of the targeted sequences within complex environmental DNA samples.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Neighbor-Joining tree based on 16S rRNA sequences recovered from Tataouine (labelled with the prefix DTat) and from hot springs 5, 7, 9, 10 and 11 (labelled with the prefixes Dtun-S5, Dtun-S7, Dtun-S9, Dtun-S10 and Dtun-S11, respectively). The tree is simplified to include one sequence per OTU and per collection site, as well as the most similar sequences from public databases. The number of sequences within each OTU is indicated at the leaves (n = x). A complete tree is shown in Figure S2.

Molecular diversity of taxa affiliated with Deinococcus-Thermus in the desert of Tataouine

All twenty-four 16S rRNA gene clone sequences from the desert of Tataouine were identified as belonging to Deinococcales, and could be divided into two groups: the first group affiliates with the genus Deinococcus and comprises 14 sequences clustered into three OTUs; the second group is affiliated with the genus Truepera and comprises 10 sequences clustered into two OTUs (Fig. 2).

Nine sequences from Deinococcales were grouped into OTU 9. Within this OTU, four sequences were closely related to Deinococcus desertii (with similarity values ranging from 98.3–98.7%), a bacterium previously isolated from the Tatatouine desert sand (Chanal et al. 2006). By contrast, the other sequences were affiliated to Deinococcus hopiensis and D. navajonensis (95.5–99.8% similarity), two radioresistant strains recovered from arid soils in the Sonoran hot desert (Rainey et al. 2005). Four sequences grouped into OTU 13 were not closely related to any cultured strains, and their closest neighbor (94.1–95.2% similarity) was a 16S rRNA gene sequence detected in a quartz hypolith from the Acatama desert (Lacap et al. 2011).

Ten sequences, clustered into OTUs 6 and 10, affiliated with Truepera, and exhibited 93–94% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with Truepera radiovictrix, the sole type strain of this genus, isolated from hot spring runoffs (Albuquerque et al. 2005). These sequences displayed higher similarity (98.4–100%) to uncultured bacteria sequences from diverse biotopes and notably from extreme environments, including: rock samples from the Black Canyon of the Chihuahuan desert (NM; Northup et al. 2010); the Mars desert research station (UT; Direito et al. 2011); sunlight-exposed biofilms from Chernobyl (Ukraine; Ragon et al. 2011); and saline biological desert crusts (China; Li et al. 2013).

Thus, application of the Deino-f-326-350 and Deino-r-758-785 primers revealed sequences that were detected in our previous study (such as Deinococcus desertii), as well as several new sequences that have not previously been recovered. In particular, the presence of Truepera in this environment was unsuspected until now.

Molecular diversity of taxa affiliated with Deinococcus-Thermus in Tunisian geothermal springs

One hundred sequences belonging to the Deinococcus-Thermus group were recovered from hot springs 5, 7, 9, 10, and 11. These were marked by an uneven distribution among the five springs, as the 26 sequences derived from springs 5 and 7 all affiliated with Thermales while the 74 sequences derived from springs 9, 10, and 11 all affiliated with Deinococcales (Fig. 2). This result differs to some extent from that previously reported by Sayeh et al. (2010), in which Thermales sequences were identified in springs 5, 9, and 11, and no sequences were found to affiliate with Deinococcales. This discrepancy between the two studies could be explained by the fact that, for this study, new DNA extractions were performed from samples stored at −80°C, implicating that the DNA extracts were not exactly the same in both cases. The discrepancies could also be due to differences in DNA extraction procedures and PCR conditions (e.g., primer pair and/or amplification programs).

The 74 Deinococcales sequences recovered from springs 9, 10, and 11 all affiliated with the genus Truepera. Springs 10 and 11 displayed a very similar molecular diversity, whereas spring 9 had a distinct profile. Springs 10 and 11 were dominated by OTUs 11 and 14, representing, respectively, 93 and 96% of the sequences; these OTUs were also characterized by a lower than 90% similarity to cultured species. Sequences recovered from spring 9 also clustered into these two OTUs, but with much less abundance (three sequences). Sequences from OTU 14 were most closely related (95–99.8%) to sequences recovered from “hot” environments such as alkaline hot springs (JF935173, Papua New Guinea), arid soils of northwestern China (FR849462), and hot Calamita ferromagnetic sand (Perfumo et al. 2011). Sequences from OTU 11 were most closely related (95–96% similarity) to uncultured bacteria derived from an impressive number of saline and hypersaline environments, including: French Guiana coast mud (KC010001); the northern subtropical Pacific Ocean (Eiler et al. 2011); hypersaline microbial mats (Mexico, JN501803); north Pacific subtropical gyres (Pham et al. 2008); activated sludge from a seawater-processing wastewater treatment plant (Sánchez et al. 2011); the northeast subarctic Pacific Ocean (HQ674210); coastal sediments of the Ariake Sea (Japan, AB560052); the Xiao Chaidan salt lake (China, HM128252); tailing material from Chanaral Bay (Acatama desert, HF558617); hypersaline sediments from Lake Kasin (Russia; Emmerich et al. 2012); marine sponge (Florida; Montalvo and Hill 2011); and the Sapelo Island salt marsh (GA, AY711411). Despite their great geographic separation, springs 9 and 10 (located near Tozeur, at the border of the “Chott el-Djerid” endorheic salt lake) and 11 (located near Korbous, on the Mediterranean Sea) each showed elevated salinity (3, 5, and 11 g/L, respectively). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that sequences from OTUs 11 and 14 belong to ubiquitous halophilic Truepera found in saline environments worldwide.

Nine OTUs related to Truepera (2, 4, 6, 12, 20, 25, 35, 47, and 50), and which represent 30 sequences, were detected exclusively in spring 9. Sequences belonging to the OTUs 2, 4, 12, 25, 47, and 50 were most closely related to uncultured organisms derived from marine environments, such as surfaces of marine macroalgae (GU451513; Lachnit et al. 2011) and marine sandy sediments from the North Sea (AM040122; Musat et al. 2006). Bacteria belonging to these OTUs may correspond to salt-tolerant species. This hypothesis is consistent with the location of spring 9 near the endorheic salt lake “Chott el-Djerid”. The OTU 6 encompassed six sequences that were also detected in spring 9, and which displayed close relationships with sequences detected in several extreme environments such as deserts and radioactive sites (see above). This OTU was singular in that it was additionally represented in the Tataouine desert sample; this phenomenon could be the signature of exchanges between the Tataouine site and spring 9, possibly occurring through the dust and sand storms that frequently occur in this region.

The 26 Thermales sequences derived from spring 5 (13 sequences) and spring 7 (13 sequences) all affiliated with the genus Thermus and clustered into two OTUs. OTU 1 was the most abundant and accounted for 77% of the sequences from spring 5, and 100% of the sequences from spring 7. Sequences from this OTU have no close cultured neighbor, and exhibit high similarity (96.1–97.0%) with a sequence detected in hot mineral soils (Antarctica; Soo et al. 2009). In addition, three sequences from spring 5 clustered into OTU 5 and were closely related to Thermus thermophilus (97.4–99.6% similarity) and Thermus arciformis (97.6% similarity), two thermophilic strains isolated from hot springs (Murzina et al. 1988; Zhang et al. 2010). As most Deinococcus species are mesophilic or moderately thermophilic, the absence of these bacteria from springs 5 and 7 could be explained by the elevated temperatures recorded at these sites (73°C and 70°C, respectively).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that the primers developed for this study are highly specific and allow the detection of Deinococcus-Thermus sequences within environmental samples. They represent a powerful tool to detect novel Deinococcus-Thermus sequences through the sequencing of a limited number of clones, which will provide new insight into Deinococcus-Thermus molecular diversity in extreme environments. In line with this, our results indicate the presence of previously undescribed salt-tolerant bacteria in three springs.

These primers could be used in ecological studies for a rapid screening of environmental DNA samples, and could also be applicable to clarify the biogeography of the Deinococcus-Thermus phylum.

Acknowledgments

We thank Laurie Piette for technical assistance. This work was financially supported by the CEA through the Toxicology Program. Nicolas Theodorakopoulos is supported by a PhD grant co-funded by the IRSN and the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur regional council. We thank Brandon Loveall of Improvence for manuscript correction services.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Figure S1. PCR amplification using Deino-f-326-350 and Deino-r-758-785 primers and genomic DNA of diverse Deinococcus, Meiothermus, Thermus, Paenibacillus, Bacillus and Lysinibacillus strains.

Figure S2. Neighbor-Joining tree (1000 replicates) based on 16S rRNA gene sequences recovered from Tataouine (labelled with the prefix DTat) and from hot springs 5, 7, 9, 10 and 11 (labelled with the prefixes Dtun-S5, Dtun-S7, Dtun-S9, Dtun-S10 and Dtun-S11, respectively). The tree includes the most similar sequences from public databases.

Figure S3. Rarefaction curves of the OTUs at 97% sequence similarity.

mbo30002-0862-SD1.pdf (250.8KB, pdf)
mbo30002-0862-SD2.tif (1.4MB, tif)
mbo30002-0862-SD3.tif (86KB, tif)
mbo30002-0862-SD4.txt (853B, txt)

References

  1. Albuquerque L, Simões C, Nobre MF, Pino NM, Battista JR, Silva MT, et al. Truepera radiovictrix gen. nov., sp. nov., a new radiation resistant species and the proposal of Trueperaceae fam. nov. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005;247:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asker D, Awad TS, McLandsborough L, Beppu T, Ueda K. Deinococcus depolymerans sp. nov., a gamma- and UV-radiation-resistant bacterium, isolated from a naturally radioactive site. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011;61:1448–1453. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.013482-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auchtung TA, Shyndriayeva G, Cavanaugh CM. 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis and quantification of Korarchaeota indigenous to the hot springs of Kamchatka, Russia. Extremophiles. 2011;15:105–116. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0340-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bjornsdottir SH, Petursdottir SK, Hreggvidsson GO, Skirnisdottir S, Hjorleifsdottir S, Arnfinnsson J, et al. Thermus islandicus sp. nov., a mixotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from the Torfajokull geothermal area. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009;59:2962–2966. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.007013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brock TD, Freeze H. Thermus aquaticus gen. n. and sp. n., a nonsporulating extreme thermophile. J. Bacteriol. 1969;98:289–297. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.1.289-297.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brooks BW, Murray RGE. Nomenclature for Micrococcus radiodurans and other radiation resistant cocci: Deinococcaceae fam. nov. and Deinococcus gen. nov., including five species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1981;31:353–360. [Google Scholar]
  7. Callegan RP, Nobre MF, McTernan PM, Battista JR, Navarro-González R, McKay CP, et al. Description of four novel psychrophilic, ionizing radiation-sensitive Deinococcus species from alpine environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:1252–1258. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65405-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chanal A, Chapon V, Benzerara K, Barakat M, Christen R, Achouak W, et al. The desert of Tataouine: an extreme environment that hosts a wide diversity of microorganisms and radiotolerant bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;8:514–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chapon V, Piette L, Vesvres MH, Coppin F, Christen C, Le Marrec R, et al. Microbial diversity in contaminated soils along the T22 trench of the Chernobyl experimental platform. Appl. Geochem. 2012;27:1375–1383. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaturvedi R, Archana G. Novel 16S rRNA based PCR method targeting Deinococcus spp. and its application to assess the diversity of deinococcal populations in environmental samples. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2012;90:197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chevenet F, Brun C, Banuls AL, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. da Costa MS, Rainey FA, Nobre MF. The genus Thermus and relatives. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, editors. The prokaryotes. A handbook on the biology of bacteria. 3rd ed. Vol. 7. New York, NY: Springer; 2006. pp. 797–812. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox MM, Battista JR. Deinococcus radiodurans – the consummate survivor. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005;3:882–892. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Direito S, Ehrenfreund P, Marees A, Staats M, Foing B, Röling W. A wide variety of putative extremophiles and large beta-diversity at the Mars Desert Research Station (Utah) Int. J. Astrobiol. 2011;10:191–207. [Google Scholar]
  15. Duodu S, Larsson P, Sjödin A, Forsman M, Colquhoun DJ. The distribution of Francisella-like bacteria associated with coastal waters in Norway. Microb. Ecol. 2012;64:370–377. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eiler A, Hayakawa DH, Rappé MS. Non-random assembly of bacterioplankton communities in the subtropical north pacific ocean. Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:140. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ekman JV, Raulio M, Busse HJ, Fewer DP, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Deinobacterium chartae gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely radiation-resistant, biofilm-forming bacterium isolated from a Finnish paper mill. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011;61:540–548. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.017970-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Emmerich M, Bhansali A, Lösekann-Behrens T, Schröder C, Kappler A, Behrens S. Abundance, distribution, and activity of Fe(II)-oxidizing and Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in hypersaline sediments of Lake Kasin, southern Russia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:4386–4399. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07637-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferreira AC, Nobre MF, Rainey FA, Silva MT, Wait R, Burghardt J, et al. Deinococcus geothermalis sp. nov. and Deinococcus murrayi sp. nov., two extremely radiation-resistant and slightly thermophilic species from hot springs. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997;47:939–947. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fredrickson JK, Zachara JM, Balkwill DL, Kennedy D, Li SM, Kostandarithes HM, et al. Geomicrobiology of high-level nuclear waste-contaminated vadose sediments at the Hanford site, Washington state. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70:4230–4241. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4230-4241.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gans JD, Dunbar J, Eichorst SA, Gallegos-Graves LV, Wolinsky M, Kuske CR. A robust PCR primer design platform applied to the detection of Acidobacteria Group 1 in soil. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e96. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010;27:221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Groot A, Chapon V, Servant P, Christen R, Saux MF, Sommer S, et al. Deinococcus deserti sp. nov., a gamma-radiation-tolerant bacterium isolated from the Sahara Desert. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005;55:2441–2446. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63717-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hirsch P, Gallikowski CA, Siebert J, Peissl K, Kroppenstedt R, Schumann P, et al. Deinococcus frigens sp. nov., Deinococcus saxicola sp. nov., and Deinococcus marmoris sp. nov., low temperature and draught-tolerating, UV-resistant bacteria from continental Antarctica. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;27:636–645. doi: 10.1078/0723202042370008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Im WT, Jung HM, Ten LN, Kim MK, Bora N, Goodfellow M, et al. Deinococcus aquaticus sp. nov., isolated from fresh water, and Deinococcus caeni sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:2348–2353. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Janssen PH. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:1719–1728. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1719-1728.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kämpfer P, Lodders N, Huber B, Falsen E, Busse HJ. Deinococcus aquatilis sp. nov., isolated from water. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:2803–2806. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.2008/001206-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kobatake M, Tanabe S, Hasegawa S. New Micrococcus radioresistant red pigment, isolated from Lama glama feces, and its use as microbiological indicator of radiosterilization. C. R. Seances Soc. Biol. Fil. 1973;167:1506–1510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lacap DC, Warren-Rhodes KA, McKay CP, Pointing SB. Cyanobacteria and chloroflexi-dominated hypolithic colonization of quartz at the hyper-arid core of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Extremophiles. 2011;15:31–38. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0334-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lachnit T, Meske D, Wahl M, Harder T, Schmitz R. Epibacterial community patterns on marine macroalgae are host-specific but temporally variable. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;13:655–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012;18:1185–1193. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee SH, Cho JC. Group-specific PCR primers for the phylum Acidobacteria designed based on the comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2011;86:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lewis NF. Radio-resistant Micrococcus radiophilus sp. nov. isolated from irradiated Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus. Curr. Sci. (Bangalore) 1973;42:504. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li K, Liu R, Zhang H, Yun J. The diversity and abundance of bacteria and oxygenic phototrophs in saline biological desert crusts in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Microb. Ecol. 2013;66:40–48. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Loginova LG, Egorova LA, Golovacheva RS, Seregina LM. Thermus ruber sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1984;34:498–499. [Google Scholar]
  37. Manaia CM, Hoste B, Gutiérrez MC, Gillis M, Ventosa A, Kersters K, da Costa MS. Halotolerant Thermus strains from marine and terrestrial hot springs belong to Thermus thermophilus (ex Oshima and Imahori, 1974) nom. rev. emend. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1994;17:526–532. [Google Scholar]
  38. Montalvo NF, Hill RT. Sponge-associated bacteria are strictly maintained in two closely related but geographically distant sponge hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:7207–7216. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05285-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mühling M, Woolven-Allen J, Murrell JC, Joint I. Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities. ISME J. 2008;2:379–392. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Murzina NV, Vorozheykina DP, Matvienko NI. Nucleotide sequence of Thermus thermophilus HB8 gene coding 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:8172. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.16.8172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Musat N, Werner U, Knittel K, Kolb S, Dodenhof T, van Beusekom JE, et al. Microbial community structure of sandy intertidal sediments in the North Sea, Sylt-Rømø Basin, Wadden Sea. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;29:333–348. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nobre MF, Trüper HG, da Costa MS. Transfer of Thermus ruber (Loginova et al. 1984), Thermus silvanus (Tenreiro et al. 1995), and Thermus chliarophilus (Tenreiro et al. 1995) to Meiothermus gen. nov. as Meiothermus ruber comb. nov., Meiothermus silvanus comb. nov., and Meiothermus chliarophilus comb. nov., respectively, and emendation of the genus Thermus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996;46:604–606. [Google Scholar]
  43. Northup DE, Snider JR, Spilde MN, Porter ML, Boston JL, van de Kamp PJ, et al. Diversity of rock varnish bacterial communities from Black Canyon, New Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. 2010;115:G02007. [Google Scholar]
  44. Oshima T, Imahori K. Description of Thermus thermophilus (Yoshida and Oshima) com. nov., a non-sporulating thermophilic bacterium from a Japanese thermal spa. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1974;24:102–112. [Google Scholar]
  45. Oyaizu H, Stackebrandt E, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Pohla H, Hirata A, et al. A radiation-resistant rod-shaped bacterium Deinobacter grandis gen. nov., sp. nov., with peptidoglycan containing ornithine. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1987;37:62–67. [Google Scholar]
  46. Perfumo A, Cockell C, Elsaesser A, Marchant R, Kminek G. Microbial diversity in Calamita ferromagnetic sand. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011;3:483–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pham VD, Konstantinidis KT, Palden T, DeLong EF. Phylogenetic analyses of ribosomal DNA-containing bacterioplankton genome fragments from a 4000 m vertical profile in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;10:2313–2330. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ragon M, Restoux G, Moreira D, Moller AP, Lopez-Garcia P, Møller AP, et al. Sunlight-exposed biofilm microbial communities are naturally resistant to chernobyl ionizing-radiation levels. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rainey FA, Nobre MF, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, da Costa MS. Phylogenetic diversity of the deinococci as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence comparison. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997;47:510–514. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-2-510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rainey FA, Ray K, Ferreira M, Gatz BZ, Nobre MF, Bagaley D, et al. Extensive diversity of ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran Desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus obtained from a single soil sample. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:5225–5235. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5225-5235.2005. Erratum in: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005. 71: 7630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rainey FA, Ferreira M, Nobre MF, Ray K, Bagaley D, Earl AM, et al. Deinococcus peraridilitoris sp. nov., isolated from a coastal desert. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007;57:1408–1412. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64956-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sánchez O, Garrido L, Forn I, Massana R, Maldonado MI, Mas J. Molecular characterization of activated sludge from a seawater-processing wastewater treatment plant. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011;4:628–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00256.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sayeh R, Birrien JL, Alain K, Barbier G, Hamdi M, Prieur D. Microbial diversity in Tunisian geothermal springs as detected by molecular and culture-based approaches. Extremophiles. 2010;14:501–514. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0327-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Slade D, Radman M. Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011;75:133–191. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Soo RM, Wood SA, Grzymski JJ, McDonald IR, Cary SC. Microbial biodiversity of thermophilic communities in hot mineral soils of Tramway Ridge, Mount Erebus, Antarctica. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;11:715–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stach JE, Maldonado LA, Ward AC, Goodfellow M, Bull AT. New primers for the class Actinobacteria: application to marine and terrestrial environments. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;5:828–841. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Suresh K, Reddy GSN, Sengupta S, Shivaji S. Deinococcus indicus sp. nov., an arsenic-resistant bacterium from an aquifer in West Bengal. India. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004;54:457–461. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02758-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vajna B, Kanizsai S, Kéki Z, Márialigeti K, Schumann P, Tóth EM. Thermus composti sp. nov., isolated from oyster mushroom compost. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012;62:1486–1490. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.030866-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Widmer F, Seidler RJ, Gillevet PM, Watrud LS, Di Giovanni GD. A highly selective PCR protocol for detecting 16S rRNA genes of the genus Pseudomonas (sensu stricto) in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998;64:2545–2553. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.7.2545-2553.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yoo SH, Weon HY, Kim SJ, Kim YS, Kim BY, Kwon SW. Deinococcus aerolatus sp. nov. and Deinococcus aerophilus sp. nov., isolated from air samples. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010;60:1191–1195. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.016030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yu TT, Yao JC, Ming H, Yin YR, Zhou EM, Liu MJ, et al. Thermus tengchongensis sp. nov., isolated from a geothermally heated soil sample in Tengchong, Yunnan, south-west China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;103:513–518. doi: 10.1007/s10482-012-9833-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yuan M, Zhang W, Dai S, Wu J, Wang Y, Tao T, et al. Deinococcus gobiensis sp. nov., an extremely radiation-resistant bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009;59:1513–1517. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.004523-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang XQ, Ying Y, Ye Y, Xu XW, Zhu XF, Wu M. Thermus arciformis sp. nov., a thermophilic species from a geothermal area. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010;60:834–839. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.007690-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mbo30002-0862-SD1.pdf (250.8KB, pdf)
mbo30002-0862-SD2.tif (1.4MB, tif)
mbo30002-0862-SD3.tif (86KB, tif)
mbo30002-0862-SD4.txt (853B, txt)

Articles from MicrobiologyOpen are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES