Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):11264–11267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.11264

Influence of light on DNA content of Helianthus annuus Linnaeus.

H J Price 1, J S Johnston 1
PMCID: PMC38318  PMID: 8855344

Abstract

Mean nuclear 2C DNA content (C equaling haploid DNA per nucleus) of the first leaf of the sunflower, Helianthus annuus L., is influenced by the quality and the quantity of light. Seedlings of two inbred lines, RHA 299 and RHA 271 were germinated and grown in controlled environmental conditions. Lighting was adjusted to provide different combinations of photon flux densities and red to far red (R:FR) ratios. At R:FR = 5.8 and photon flux densities of 170 mumol.m-2.s-1, 200 mumol.m-2.s-1, and 230 mumol.m-2.s-1, DNA content remained high and relatively constant (x = 6.97 pg for RHA 271 and x = 7.32 pg for RHA 299). When the photon flux density range (R:FR = 5.8) was elevated to 350 mumol.m-2.s-1, 410 mumol.m-2.s-1, and 470 mumol.m-2.s-1, mean DNA content was reduced to 6.23 pg (RHA 271) and 6.46 pg (RHA 299). At R:FR = 1.5, mean DNA content was consistently high (7.2-7.9 pg) only at the lowest photon flux density of 170 mumol.m-2.s-1. Significant decreases in DNA content (< or = 12%) were observed at photon flux densities of 200 mumol.m-2.s-1 and 230 mumol.m-2.s-1. At the higher photon flux densities (350 mumol.m-2.s-1, 410 mumol.m-2.s-1, and 470 mumol.m-2.s-1) and R:RF = 1.5, the plants had extremely low DNA contents (mean x = 3.36 pg for RHA 271 and 3.41 pg for RHA 299) and high between-plant variance. The instability of DNA content, particularly for plants grown under light that is far red rich, suggests that phytochromes may be involved in regulating DNA content of the sunflower.

Full text

PDF
11264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett M. D., Smith J. B. Nuclear dna amounts in angiosperms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 May 27;274(933):227–274. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1976.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Galbraith D. W., Harkins K. R., Knapp S. Systemic Endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1991 Jul;96(3):985–989. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.3.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Galbraith D. W., Harkins K. R., Maddox J. M., Ayres N. M., Sharma D. P., Firoozabady E. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science. 1983 Jun 3;220(4601):1049–1051. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4601.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hof J van't Relationships between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Aug;39(1):48–58. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackson R. C., Crane C. F., Johnston J. S., Ellison J. R., Price H. J. Aneuploidy, structural chromosome changes, and DNA amounts in the annual taxa of the Haplopappus spinulosus complex. Chromosome Res. 1993 May;1(1):53–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00710607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McNellis T. W., Deng X. W. Light control of seedling morphogenetic pattern. Plant Cell. 1995 Nov;7(11):1749–1761. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.11.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moav J., Moav R., Zohary D. Spontaneous morphological alterations of chromosomes in Nicotiana hybrids. Genetics. 1968 May;59(1):57–63. doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Quail P. H. Phytochrome: a light-activated molecular switch that regulates plant gene expression. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:389–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.002133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sparrow A. H., Price H. J., Underbrink A. G. A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1972;23:451–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas C. A., Jr The genetic organization of chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet. 1971;5:237–256. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.05.120171.001321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Waters E. R., Schaal B. A. Heat shock induces a loss of rRNA-encoding DNA repeats in Brassica nigra. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 20;93(4):1449–1452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES