Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of SMO and neural tube defects (NTDs) in Chinese population. Method: A total of 113 NTDs cases and 138 healthy controls were used in this study. 10 selected single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites in the SMO gene were analyzed with MassArray high-throughput DNA analyzer with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. A series of statistical methods were carried out to investigate the correlation between the SNPs and the patient susceptibility to NTDs. Results: The C allele of rs3824 increased the risk of spina bifida (OR=2.52; 95% CI: 1.18, 5.38; p=0.026) but not the risk of anencephaly or encephalocele. Significant differences were found between spina bifida and controls when we compared the GG group with the CC+CG group (OR=2.66; 95% CI: 1.26, 5.61; p=0.011). CC+CG genotype was a risk factor for spina bifida. Conclusions: The gene polymorphism loci rs3824 of SMO was closely related to spina bifida in Chinese population from Shanxi. The haplotype GA in rs3824 and rs9706 increased the risk of NTDs particularly spina bifida in women.
Keywords: Neural tube defects (NTDs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), SMO, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF)
Introduction
Neural tube defects (NTDs) are severe birth defects (congenital anomalies), which are the leading cause of death in babies under 1 year of age. NTDs are the second most common cause of birth defects worldwide and include anencephaly, spina bifida and encephalocele etc. They are associated with a failure of neural tube closure during early embryogenesis. NTDs can result in miscarriages, infant death, or serious lifetime disabilities, which can be a major burden for surviving children and their families [1-4]. The incidence of NTDs in Shanxi Province is very high. It is more than 10-fold higher than the national Chinese average, with an observed frequency of 199.38 NTDs per 10,000 pregnancies from 2002-2004. Insufficient intake of vegetables due to geographical reasons has been evoked as one environmental factor potentially leading to the high risk of NTDs [5].
Indeed, for the past 30 years, NTDs in humans have been considered to be multifactorial in origin. They are caused by the interplay of multiple genes, along with the interaction of genes with their environment [1,6,7]. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in different signaling pathways have been shown to be associated with human NTDs, including rs1801133 in the MTHFR gene, rs3733890 in the BHMT gene, rs2851391 and rs234713 in the CBS gene, rs202676 in the GCPII gene and rs357564 in the PTCH1 gene [8-16].
The protein SMO encoded by proto-oncogene smoothened is a receptor for PTCH1 and acts as a positive regulator of the signaling pathway. PTCH1 can inhibit the activity of SMO and control proliferation, differentiation and patterning in almost every tissue and organ during embryogenesis [17-19]. Genetic inactivation of Smo cells autonomously blocks the ability of cells to transduce the Hedgehog (Hh) signal. Hh signaling organizes pattern formation in the embryonic limb, neural tube, and other structures and Hh pathway dysfunction can lead to birth defects and tumors. It has been confirmed that the abnormal expression of SMO was implicated in a multitude of tumour types such as basal cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer tumor and so on. SMO was homologous with G protein-coupled receptor and was a receptor required in Sonic hedgehog (SHH) signal transmission. SHH signaling plays a crucial role during neurulation. Several researchers have suggested that it is involved in regulating the folding of the neural plate. Activated SMO can lead to the activation of Hedgehog target genes in the absence of SHH and PTCH [19-22].
In this study, single gene polymorphisms (SNPs) of SMO in NTD cases and healthy controls were investigated to evaluate the genetic risk factors for NTDs.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
This study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Institute of Pediatrics (IRB00008963) and written informed consent was obtained from each of the participants or their parents. The objective and procedures of this study were explained to all of the subjects and the patient’s parents. All of the subjects and the patient’s parents signed the informed consent forms. All potential participants who declined to participate or otherwise did not participate were eligible for treatment and were not disadvantaged in any other way by not participating in the study.
Study design
A case-control study was designed for testing the possible association between SMO SNPs and NTD susceptibility. NTD and control samples were obtained from the Lvliang area of Shanxi Province in northern China. All subjects were Han Chinese. Stillborn and aborted NTD cases were obtained from nine county hospitals in the same area from 2004-2009. NTDs were diagnosed by B-mode ultrasound and pathology, with sex, gestational age and general development of the embryo recorded in details. Diagnosis of NTDs was performed by experienced pathologists according to the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision codes Q00 anencephaly, Q05 spina bifida, and Q01 encephalocele (http://apps.who.int/classifications/). Subjects (n=113) chosen for analysis included 55 spina bifida, 66 anencephaly and 17 encephaloceles. Control subjects (n=138), aborted for nonmedical reasons, were selected from the same region and selected according to sex and gestational week. Fetuses displaying any pathologic malformation were excluded from the control group.
DNA extraction
All samples for DNA extraction were stored at -20°C in local hospitals before being shipped on ice to the laboratory for study. The separation of different tissues was performed by pathologists. Brain tissue was collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from frozen samples using a Maxwell 16 system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of DNA samples were determined by measuring their absorbance at 260 and 280 nm.
Genotyping
SNPs (n=10) spanning the SMO gene were selected for investigation. These included seven tag SNPs, which were selected using the Haploview software (version 3.32; http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/). Additional informative SNPs (n=3) were selected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SNP database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP). rs3824, rs9607, rs1061280, rs2228617, rs13231139, rs2566871, rs4731562, rs4731563, rs6962740 and rs12674259 were analyzed in our study. Genotyping was conducted with a MassArray high-throughput DNA analyzer with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). It was repeated and 10% samples were sequenced to validate the consistency. Amplifications were conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed with SPSS16.0 (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, USA). All p-values were two-sided. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using a chi-square test. Clinical data regarding continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD, and differences between groups were assessed using a Mann-Whitney U test. When data did not meet normality, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. Our analysis concerned the whole study group stratified into three major types: spina bifida, anencephaly and encephalocele. In each stratum, cases were compared with the corresponding control groups. Genotype and allele frequencies for each SNP were compared between cases and controls using a chi-square test. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for gestation week and sex were established using multiple logistic regressions. Linkage disequilibrium for rs3824 and rs9706 was estimated using Haploview. Power calculations were carried out using Quanto software (http://hydra.usc.edu/GxE). Based on the smallest cohort size 113 patients and 138 controls), our study had 80% power to detect an OR of 2.0 at a significance level of 5%.
Results
Subjects
Clinical and demographic characteristics of subjects are shown in Table 1. The average week of gestation was about 21 weeks in controls and cases. The two groups contained both male and female fetuses. There did not appear to be any apparent difference with respect to sex or gestational week between the two study groups.
Table 1.
Characteristic | case | control | P 1 | spina bifida | anencephalus | encephalocele |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 113 | 138 | 55 | 66 | 17 | |
Gestational week2 | 20±3.9 | 21±3.9 | 0.96 | 22±4.1 | 20±3.1 | 22±5.2 |
Sex [n (%)] | ||||||
M | 56 (50.0) | 74 (53.6) | 0.52 | 30 (54.5) | 39 (59.1) | 5 (29.4) |
F | 57 (50.0) | 62 (46.4) | 23 (45.5) | 27 (40.9) | 12 (70.6) |
x2 test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.
Mean ± SD.
Distribution of SMO polymorphisms
Associations were discovered between the rs3824 polymorphism in the SMO gene and different types of NTD (Table 2). For genotypes and alleles, significant differences were not found between cases and controls. The C allele of rs3824 increased the risk of spina bifida but not the risk of anencephaly or encephalocele. Significant differences were found between spina bifida and controls when we compared the GG group with the CC+CG group. We found that the CC+CG genotype was a risk factor for spina bifida. The p value in the table has not been adjusted by multiple corrections. When the data were analyzed on the basis of gender, it showed that there was no significant difference between the case and control group (Table 3).
Table 2.
control | Case | spina bifida | anencephalus | Encephalocele | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
N | P | OR (95% CI) | N | P | OR (95% CI) | N | P | OR (95% CI) | N | P | OR (95% CI) | ||
GG | 59 | 56 | 0.252 | 1 | 15 | 0.026 | 1 | 31 | 0.83 | 1 | 10 | 0.205 | 1 |
CG | 1 | 4 | 4.21 (0.46-38.86) | 2 | 7.87 (0.67-92.67) | 1 | 1.90 (0.16-31.48) | 1 | 5.90 (0.34-102.17) | ||||
CC | 39 | 52 | 1.41 (0.81-2.44) | 25 | 2.52 (1.18-5.38) | 24 | 1.17 (0.60-2.89) | 3 | 0.45 (0.12-1.75) | ||||
G | 119 | 113 | 0.066 | 1 | 32 | 0.001 | 1 | 63 | 0.508 | 1 | 21 | 0.134 | 1 |
C | 79 | 108 | 1.44 (0.98-2.12) | 52 | 2.45 (1.45-4.14) | 49 | 1.17 (0.73-1.87) | 7 | 0.502 (0.20-1.24) | ||||
GG | 59 | 56 | 0.163 | 1 | 15 | 0.011 | 1 | 31 | 0.608 | 1 | 10 | 0.399 | 1 |
CC+CG | 40 | 56 | 1.47 (0.85-2.55) | 27 | 2.66 (1.26-5.61) | 25 | 1.19 (0.61-2.31) | 4 | 0.59 (0.17-2.01) |
x2 tests were used to calculate P-values. Fisher’s exact test was used when the sample size was less than 5.
Table 3.
SEX | Genotype | Control | case | p | OR (95% CI) | spina bifida | P | OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | GG | 27 | 29 | 0.72 | 1 | 17 | 0.67 | 1 |
CG | 0 | 2 | -- | 0 | -- | |||
CC | 21 | 31 | 1.37 (0.64-2.95) | 16 | 1.21 (0.50-2.95) | |||
M | GG | 32 | 26 | 0.62 | 1 | 12 | 0.64 | 1 |
CG | 1 | 2 | 2.46 (0.21-28.69) | 1 | 2.67 (0.15-46.11) | |||
CC | 18 | 20 | 1.37 (0.60-3.11) | 10 | 1.48 (0.53-4.10) |
x2 tests were used to calculate P-values. Fisher’s exact test was used when the sample size was less than 5.
Distribution of SMO haplotypes
Each SNP site involved with multiple associations was investigated for linkage disequilibrium. Evidence for linkage disequilibrium was observed for rs3824 and rs9607. Two are located in the SMO gene 3’UTR region. The two SNPs generated four common haplotypes and in female the GA haplotype is associated with a slightly elevated risk for NTDs, especially spina bifida (Table 4).
Table 4.
SEX | haplotype | Control fre | case fre | OR (95% CI) | spina bifida fre | OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | CG | 0.088 | 0.098 | 1 | 0.049 | 1 |
F | 0.101 | 0.154 | 1.52 (0.66-3.51) | 0.076 | 1.62 (0.69-3.82) | |
M | GA | 0.081 | 0.064 | 1 | 0.033 | 1 |
F | 0.061 | 0.078 | 3.75 (1.01-13.94) | 0.045 | 4.86 (1.12-21.11) | |
M | CA | -- | 0.005 | 1 | 0.003 | 1 |
F | 0.002 | 0.004 | -- | 0.0.3 | -- | |
M | GG | 0.067 | 0.065 | 1 | 0.032 | 1 |
F | 0.067 | 0.065 | 0.43 (0.12-1.63) | 0.042 | 0.42 (0.09-1.89) |
x2 tests were used to calculate P-values. Fisher’s exact test was used when the sample size was less than 5.
Discussion
In this study, the association between SMO polymorphisms and risk of NTDs was analyzed for the Lvliang region, which has the highest prevalence of NTDs in China [5]. The results showed that infants with the CC genotype of the SMO rs3824 polymorphism and the GA haplotype have an increased risk of spina bifida. The result analyzed by the Haploview program showed that the GA genotype comprises two SNPs in 3’UTR. We found this GA genotype was associated with a slightly increased risk of NTD in female.
The Hh signaling pathway is composed of patched (PTCH) and SMO, two transmembrane proteins, and downstream Gli transcription factors. SMO protein, a 7-pass transmembrane protein and key transcriber in Hh signaling pathways, plays a crucial role in regulating the folding of the neural plate. It can transport Hh signals to a cytoplasmic transduction cascade that ultimately regulates the Gli family of zinc finger transcription. Therefore, it activated nuclear gene transcription and the Hh signaling pathway. Hh pathway dysfunction can lead to birth defects or proliferative disorders [19-22].
According to the international classification standard, NTDs can be divided into three subtypes. There were 55 patients with spina bifida, 66 with anencephaly and 17 with encephalocele in our study. It is worth noting that a significant association was observed between spina bifida and the rs3824 polymorphisms in the SMO gene in our work, it is the C allele of rs3824 that is related to spina bifida. In our previous study we also found SNPs of PTCH1 gene was related to spina bifida [23]. These suggested that the polymorphisms of these key genes affected the activity of the SHH pathway and resulted in neural tube closure obstacles, and then leaded to spina bifida.
The process of neural tube closure occurs with a characteristic sequence of events along the embryonic axis. The human embryo appears to have two closure sites, at the hindbrain/cervical boundary (closure 1) and the forebrain (closure 2) [2,24]. Fusion at closure 1 spreads bidirectionally into the anterior neuropore and along the spinal region into the posterior neuropore. Spina bifida most commonly results from failure to complete closure at the posterior neuropore. Anencephaly is caused by failure of neural tube closure in the cranial region, thereby development of the brain is disrupted [24-26]. Our findings indicate that the SMO gene may preferentially affect the progress of closure from closure 1 to the posterior neuropore. In the caudal spinal region, closing of the neural tube is characterized by dorsolateral hinge points (DLHPs), with no median hinge point (MHP) formed [27]. DLHPs are formed by a combination of BMP2 and Noggin in the presence of low levels of SHH. Previous studies have found that an increase in SHH signalling can prevent neural tube closure by repressing the formation of DLHPs [28,29]. The rs3824 polymorphisms have a possible role in activating the SHH signaling pathway, thereby resulting in less effective formation of DLHPs.
There was gender difference in the incidence of NTDs [30]. There were no statistically significant differences between the case and control groups when they were stratified by gender in this study. This may be due to small sample size. But in the haplotype analysis, when the samples were stratified by gender, we found that the haplotype GA in rs3824 and rs9706 increased the risk of NTDs particularly spina bifida in women.
In conclusion, rs3824 single nucleotide polymorphism of SMO gene may be associated with spina bifida. The haplotype GA in rs3824 and rs9706 increased the risk of NTDs particularly spina bifida in women. These may be due to the SNP site located at the 3’UTR region and lead to the change of Hh pathway activity.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the Natural Science Fund of Beijing (13G20331/MG203), the National Natural Science Fund of China (81000249/H0417, 81270699/H0417).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Wallingford JB, Niswander LA, Shaw GM, Finnell RH. The continuing challenge of understanding, preventing, and treating neural tube defects. Science. 2013;339:1222002. doi: 10.1126/science.1222002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Detrait ER, George TM, Etchevers HC, Gilbert JR, Vekemans M, Speer MC. Human neural tube defects: developmental biology, epidemiology, and genetics. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005;27:515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Copp AJ, Greene ND, Murdoch JN. The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4:784–793. doi: 10.1038/nrg1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pitkin RM. Folate and neural tube defects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:285S–288S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.285S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gu X, Lin L, Zheng X, Zhang T, Song X, Wang J, Li X, Li P, Chen G, Wu J, Wu L, Liu J. High prevalence of NTDs in Shanxi Province: a combined epidemiological approach. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007;79:702–707. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boyles AL, Billups AV, Deak KL, Siegel DG, Mehltretter L, Slifer SH, Bassuk AG, Kessler JA, Reed MC, Nijhout HF, George TM, Enterline DS, Gilbert JR, Speer MC NTD Collaborative Group. Neural tube defects and folate pathway genes: family-based association tests of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1547–1552. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grewal J, Carmichael SL, Song J, Shaw GM. Neural tube defects: an analysis of neighbourhood- and individual-level socio-economic characteristics. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23:116–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00992.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carter TC, Pangilinan F, Troendle JF, Molloy AM, VanderMeer J, Mitchell A, Kirke PN, Conley MR, Shane B, Scott JM, Brody LC, Mills JL. Evaluation of 64 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms as risk factors for neural tube defects in a large Irish study population. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:14–21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Houcher B, Bourouba R, Djabi F, Yilmaz E, Egin Y, Akar N. Polymorphisms of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and cystathionine beta-synthase genes as a risk factor for neural tube defects in Setif, Algeria. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;45:472–477. doi: 10.1159/000283086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yan L, Zhao L, Long Y, Zou P, Ji G, Gu A, Zhao P. Association of the maternal MTHFR C677T polymorphism with susceptibility to neural tube defects in offsprings: evidence from 25 case-control studies. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Houcher B, Houcher Z, Touabti A, Begag S, Torun D, Egin Y, Akar N, Kadour F. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and cystathionine beta-synthase polymorphisms in cardiovascular disease in the algerian population. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14:775–780. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu ZZ, Zhang JT, Liu D, Hao YH, Chang BM, Xie J, Li PZ. Interaction between maternal 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and methionine synthase A2756G gene variants to increase the risk of fetal neural tube defects in a Shanxi Han population. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:865–869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pangilinan F, Mitchell A, VanderMeer J, Molloy AM, Troendle J, Conley M, Kirke PN, Sutton M, Sequeira JM, Quadros EV, Scott JM, Mills JL, Brody LC. Transcobalamin II receptor polymorphisms are associated with increased risk for neural tube defects. J Med Genet. 2010;47:677–685. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pangilinan F, Molloy AM, Mills JL, Troendle JF, Parle-McDermott A, Signore C, O’Leary VB, Chines P, Seay JM, Geiler-Samerotte K, Mitchell A, VanderMeer JE, Krebs KM, Sanchez A, Cornman-Homonoff J, Stone N, Conley M, Kirke PN, Shane B, Scott JM, Brody LC. Evaluation of common genetic variants in 82 candidate genes as risk factors for neural tube defects. BMC Med Genet. 2012;13:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van der Linden IJ, Afman LA, Heil SG, Blom HJ. Genetic variation in genes of folate metabolism and neural-tube defect risk. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65:204–215. doi: 10.1079/pns2006495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yaliwal LV, Desai RM. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations, a genetic cause for familial recurrent neural tube defects. Indian J Hum Genet. 2012;18:122–124. doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.96680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lupi O. Correlations between the Sonic Hedgehog pathway and basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46:1113–1117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wijgerde M, Ooms M, Hoogerbrugge JW, Grootegoed JA. Hedgehog signaling in mouse ovary: Indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog from granulosa cells induce target gene expression in developing theca cells. Endocrinology. 2005;146:3558–3566. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Varjosalo M, Taipale J. Hedgehog: functions and mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2454–2472. doi: 10.1101/gad.1693608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Simpson F, Kerr MC, Wicking C. Trafficking, development and hedgehog. Mech Dev. 2009;126:279–288. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wijgerde M, McMahon JA, Rule M, McMahon AP. A direct requirement for Hedgehog signaling for normal specification of all ventral progenitor domains in the presumptive mammalian spinal cord. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2849–2864. doi: 10.1101/gad.1025702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim J, Kato M, Beachy PA. Gli2 trafficking links Hedgehog-dependent activation of Smoothened in the primary cilium to transcriptional activation in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:21666–21671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912180106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z, Wang L, Shangguan S, Lu X, Chang S, Wang J, Zou J, Wu L, Zhang T, Luo Y. Association between PTCH1 polymorphisms and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97:409–415. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Au KS, Ashley-Koch A, Northrup H. Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16:6–15. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Copp AJ, Greene ND. Defining a PARticular pathway of neural tube closure. Dev Cell. 2010;18:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Copp AJ, Greene ND. Genetics and development of neural tube defects. J Pathol. 2010;220:217–230. doi: 10.1002/path.2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shum AS, Copp AJ. Regional differences in morphogenesis of the neuroepithelium suggest multiple mechanisms of spinal neurulation in the mouse. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1996;194:65–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00196316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ybot-Gonzalez P, Savery D, Gerrelli D, Signore M, Mitchell CE, Faux CH, Greene ND, Copp AJ. Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure. Development. 2007;134:789–799. doi: 10.1242/dev.000380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ybot-Gonzalez P, Cogram P, Gerrelli D, Copp AJ. Sonic hedgehog and the molecular regulation of mouse neural tube closure. Development. 2002;129:2507–2517. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.10.2507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mohamed MA, Aly H. Birth region, race and sex may affect the prevalence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, abdominal wall and neural tube defects among US newborns. J Perinatol. 2012;32:861–8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]