Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Comparative Cytogenetics logoLink to Comparative Cytogenetics
. 2011 Jun 1;5(2):105–121. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v5i2.969

Karyotype analyses of ten sections of Trigonella (Fabaceae)

E Martin 1, H Akan 2, M Ekici 3, Z Aytac 3
PMCID: PMC3833733  PMID: 24260623

Abstract Abstract

Karyotypes of ten sections of genus Trigonella Linnaeus, 1753 (Fabaceae) from Turkey were investigated. Somatic chromosome numbers of examined species were determined as 2n=14 and 16. The karyotype analyses of the species were carried out and somatic chromosome numbers of Trigonella plicata Boiss., 1872, Trigonella brachycarpa (Fisch.) Moris, 1833, Trigonella rostrata Boiss., 1872, Trigonella lunata Boiss., 1843, Trigonella isthmocarpa Boiss. et Balansa 1856, Trigonella rhytidocarpa Boiss. et Balansa, 1859, Trigonella spicata Sibth. et Sm., 1813, Trigonella cephalotes Boiss. et Balansa 1856, Trigonella capitata Boiss., 1843 and Trigonella gladiata Steven, 1808 were reported for the first time. Two pairs of satellite metaphase chromosomes were observed in Trigonella cariensis Boiss., 1843 and one pair in Trigonella lunata.Moreover, 2 B-chromosomes were found only in Trigonella procumbens Rchb., 1830 among all studied species. The aims of this study are to provide karyological data for a significant pool of the taxa, to show differences among them in the number, size and morphology of somatic chromosomes, to verify previous reports or represent numbers which are different from those cited previously.

Keywords: omatic chromosome, Turkey, Fabaceae, karyotype

Introduction

Trigonella L., 1753 (Fabaceae) includes about 135 species worldwide, and most of the species are distributed in dry regions around Mediterranean, West Asia, Europe, North and South Africa, North America, and with only two species being present in South Australia (Mabberly 1997). The genus Trigonella has 13 sections and 50 species in Turkey (Huber-Morath 1970). Trigonella species are localized in different phytogeographical regions in Turkey with 21 endemic species showing 42% endemism rate (Huber-Morath 1970, Martin et al. 2008).

According to the literature,some studies conducted on the karyology of the Trigonella include approximately hundred species (Darlington and Wylie 1955, Tutin and Heywood 1964, Ghosh 1980, Astanova 1981, Agarwal and Gupta 1983, Ladizinsky and Vosa 1986, Danin and Small 1989, Bal 1990, Kumari and Bir 1990, Bidak and Amin 1996, Pavlova 1996, Yılmaz and 2006, Martin et al. 2008). The somatic chromosome numbers of the genus Trigonella are reported as 2n=14, 16 and 18. In addition, some chemical, morphological and taxonomical studies were conducted on Trigonella species (Meusel and Jager 1962, Sırjaev 1935, Baum 1968, Small et al. 1981, Small et al. 1981, Classen et al. 1982, Small 1988, Danin and Small 1989, Small and Jomphe 1989, Al-Habori et al. 1998, Sheoran et al. 1999, Ram and Verma 2000, Murakami et al. 2000, Oncina et al. 2000, Sur et al. 2001, Sabir et al. 2002, Petropoulos et al. 2002).

In the present work we carried out a karyological study on 19 species of Trigonella, belonging to ten sections, collected from different regions of Turkey (Huber-Murath 1970).

Material and methods

Seedlings were collected between the years of 2002 and 2005 from natural habitats in different localities (Table 1). For karyotype analyses, root tips were obtained from seeds germinated in humidified Petri dishes at room temperature. Root tips were pretreated with α-monobromonaphthalene at 4 °C for 16 h and fixed in Carnoy’s fixative for 24 h at 4 °C. Before staining, the material was hydrolyzed with 1N HCl for 13–15 minutes at room temperature. The chromosomes were stained with 2% aceto orcein and mounted in 45% acetic acid. Permanent slides were made by using the standard liquid nitrogen method and then examined under Olympus BX50 Photomicroscope using an oil immersion objective (100 X). Photographs were taken with the same microscope. Karyotype analyses were made by the use of an Image Analysis System (Bs200Pro).

Table 1.

Localities, collector name and numbers of studied Trigonella species.

Taxa Locality Collector name and number
Trigonella cretica Burdur: Gölhisar-Dirmil 4. km, 30.05.2002, 900–950 m, conserved area H.Akan 3480, M. Ekici
Trigonella plicata Konya: Hadim-Konya 10. km, 17.07.2002, 1350 m, roadside H.Akan 3789, Z.Aytaç, M.Ekici
Trigonella brachycarpa Konya: Hadim-Konya 10. km, 17.07.2002, 1400 m, roadside H.Akan 3786, Z.Aytaç, M.Ekici
Trigonella rostrata Konya: East of Hadim-Karaman, 17.07.2002, 1250 m, roadside H.Akan 3805, Z.Aytaç, M.Ekici
Trigonella lunata Adana: Pozantı-Çiftehan 8.km, 08.06.2003, 852 m, stony places H.Akan 4687, M.Ekici
Trigonella corniculata Izmir: Bayraklı, 26.05.2002, 20–50m, meadowsMuğla: Bodrum castle, 25.05.2002, 10 m, meadows H.Akan 4616, M.EkiciH.Akan 3391, M.Ekici
Trigonella spinosa Muğla: Marmaris-Datça 50. km, 06.05.2005, 5–10 m, maqius H.Akan 5655, M.Ekici
Trigonella monspeliaca Muğla: Dalaman, Ortaca district, 24.5.2002, 20 m, stony placesAntalya: Exit of Antalya-Hafızpaşa, 23.05.2002, 750 m, maqius H.Akan 3358, M.EkiciH.Akan 3327, M.Ekici
Trigonella isthmocarpa Aksaray: 28 km E of Aksaray, Hasan mountain foots, 08.06.2003, 1145 m H.Akan 4695, M.Ekici
Trigonella rhytidocarpa Niğde: Ulukışla-Pozantı 5. km, 16.07.2002, 1300 m, roadside H.Akan 3778, M.Ekici
Trigonella spicata Antalya-Bucak 20.km, Pınarbaşı district, 23.05.2002, 220–250 m, opening of Quercus coccifera H.Akan 3319, M.Ekici, Karavelioğulları
Trigonella cephalotes Aydın: Dilek Peninsula, National park, Aydınlık cove, 26.02.2002, 70 m H.Akan 3398, M.Ekici
Trigonella procumbens Konya: Akşehir-Gelendost 1–2.km, 22.06.2003, 1110 m, roadside of vineyards H.Akan 4760, M.Ekici
Trigonella capitata Denizli: Pamukkale, 22.06.2003, 1550 m, opening of damaged forest H.Akan 4767, M.Ekici
Trigonella coerulescens Konya: Ereğli-Karapınar 20–25km, 01.06.2002 1000 m, steppeKayseri: Kayseri, Hisarcık, Erciyes mountain road, 08.07.2002, 1550 m H.Akan 3587 Z.Aytaç, M.EkiciH.Akan 3659, M.Ekici
Trigonella gladiata Karaman: Pınarbası-Kızılkaya 2 km, 28.06.2005, 1200 m, opening of Oak H.Akan 5743, M.Ekici
Trigonella cariensis Izmir: Ayrancılar-Izmir 6.km, 25.05.2003, 100 m, foots of maqiusAntalya: Antalya-Hafızpaşa-Bucak 5.km, 23.05.2002, 775 m H.Akan 4620, M.EkiciH.Akan 3332, M.Ekici
Trigonella foenum-graecum Adana: Ceyhan-Adana 13.km., 20.05.02, 120 m, fields H.Akan 3274
Trigonella macrorrhyncha Içel: Tarsus-Çamlıyayla road, 30.km, 18.05.2003, 850 m, steppe H.Akan 4354, M.Ekici
Open in a new tab

Results

This study was carried out to analyse the karyotypes of 19 species, eight of which are endemic to Turkey, belonging to ten sections of the genus Trigonella in Turkey. These sections are: Samaroideae Boiss., Pectinatae Boiss., Lunatae Boiss., Falcatulae Boiss., Reflexae (Širj.) Vass., Isthmocarpae Boiss., Uncinatae Boiss., Capitatae Boiss., Biebersteinianae (Širj.), and Foenum-graecum Ser. Cytological results obtained from our study are arranged based on the order in the Flora of Turkey (Huber-Morath 1969).

Figure 2a.

Figure 2a.

Open in a new tab

Idiograms of Trigonella species (Trigonella corniculata no: 4616 and 3391; Trigonella monspeliaca no: 3358 and no: 3327; (Trigonella coerulescens no: 3587and3659; Trigonella cariensis no: 3332 and4620).

Figure 2b.

Figure 2b.

Open in a new tab

Idiograms of Trigonella species (Trigonella corniculata no: 4616 and 3391; Trigonella monspeliaca no: 3358 and no: 3327; (Trigonella coerulescens no: 3587and3659; Trigonella cariensis no: 3332 and4620).

Section: Samaroideae

Trigonella cretica (L.) Boiss., 1872, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, A). All chromosome pairs at the somatic metaphase phase were observed metacentric. The chromosome length ranges between 0.52 and 1.01 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 5.88 μm.

Figure 1. A–L .

Figure 1. A–L

Open in a new tab

Mitotic metaphase chromosomes of Trigonella species A Trigonella cretica B Trigonella plicata C Trigonella brachycarpa D Trigonella rostrata E The satellite (arrow) of chromosomes Trigonella lunata F Trigonella corniculata; no: 4616 G Trigonella corniculata no: 3391 H Trigonella spinosa I Trigonella monspeliaca no: 3358 J Trigonella monspeliaca no: 3327 K Trigonella isthmocarpa L Trigonella rhytidocarpa.Scale bar = 10 µm.

Section: Pectinatae

Trigonella plicata (Boiss. et Bal.) Boiss., 1872, 2n=14 (Fig. 1, B). The species has metacentric chromosome pairs at somatic metaphase. The chromosome length ranges from 0.84 to 1.34 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 7.12 μm. This species is endemic of Turkey.

Section: Lunatae

Trigonella brachycarpa (Fisch.) Moris, 1833, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, C). Trigonella rostrata (Boiss. & Bal.) Boiss., 1872, 2n=14 (Fig. 1, D). Trigonella lunata Boiss., 1843, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, E). All of the species of this section examined have metacentric chromosome pairs at somatic metaphase plates. For Trigonella brachycarpa, chromosome length ranges from 0.94 to 1.36 μm having total chromosome length of 8.85 μm. Trigonella rostrata being endemic to Turkey was observed having chromosomes whose lengths range between0.81 and 1.22 μm. In this species, the total haploid chromosome length was measured as 7.07 μm. For the species Trigonella lunata, the chromosome length was measured between 2.85 and 3.92 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 26.44 μm. In addition, this species has a pair of satellite metaphase chromosomes.

Section: Falcatulae

Trigonella corniculata L., 1759 from the specimen collected from İzmir province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, F) and from the specimen collected from Muğla province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, G). At somatic metaphase, seven pairs of metacentric and one pair of submetacentric chromosomes were observed in the former while four pairs of metacentric and four pairs of submetacenric chromosomes were detected in the latter. The specimen collected from İzmir province has chromosomes ranging between 0.61 and 0.88 μm, and the total haploid chromosome length for this specimen was measured as 5.71 μm. In the other specimen which was collected from Muğla province, the chromosome length ranges between 1.54 and 2.57 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 17.58 μm. Trigonella spinosa L., 1753, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, H). At somatic metaphase, two pairs of metacentric and six pairs of submetacentric chromosomes were observed. For this species, the chromosome lengths range from 1.49 to 2.76 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 16.76 μm.

Section: Reflexae

Trigonella monspeliaca L. 1753 from the specimen collected from Muğla province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, I) while the specimen collected from Antalya province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, J). In the former, all chromosome pairs at the somatic metaphase were observed to be metacentric, and the chromosome length ranges between 0.66 and 1.18 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 6.81 μm. In the latter specimen, five pairs of metacentric and three pairs of metacentric chromosomes were observed at somatic metaphase. The chromosome length ranges between 0.74 and 1.00 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 7.06 μm.

Section: Isthmocarpae

Trigonella isthmocarpa Boiss. et Bal., 1856, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, K) and Trigonella rhytidocarpa Boiss. & Bal. 2n=16 (Fig. 1, L). Endemic to Turkey, both species have metacentric chromosome pairs at the somatic metaphase. For the species of Trigonella isthmocarpa,the chromosome length ranges between 0.57 and 1.10 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 6.53 μm. For Trigonella rhytidocarpa, the chromosome length ranges between 0.85 and 1.40 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 8.47 μm.

Section: Uncinatae

Trigonella spicata Sibth. et Sm., 1813, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, M) and Trigonella cephalotes Boiss. et Bal., 1856, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, N). At somatic metaphase, five pairs of metacentric and three pairs of submetacentric chromosomes were observed for both species. The chromosome length of Trigonella spicata ranges between 1.00 and 1.50 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 10.36 μm. For Trigonella cephalotes, the chromosome length ranges between 0.43 and 0.94 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 4.49 μm. This species is endemic to Turkey.

Section: Capitatae

Trigonella procumbens (Besser) Reichp., 1830, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, O) and Trigonella capitata Boiss., 1843, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, P). Both species have metacentric chromosome pairs at the somatic metaphase. Endemic to Turkey, Trigonella procumbens have chromosomes ranging from 0.82 to 1.32 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 7.75 μm. Moreover, two B chromosomes are observed in this species. The other species of the section examined, Trigonella capitata, have chromosomes ranging from 0.96 to 1.30 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 9.33 μm. This species is also endemic to Turkey.

Section: Biebersteinianae

Trigonella coerulescens (Bieb.) Hal., 1901, in the specimen collected from Konya province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, R) and in the specimen collected from Kayseri province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, S). All chromosome pairs at the somatic metaphase phase were observed to be metacentric for both specimens. The chromosome length ranges between 1.38 and 1.91 μm for the former while that of the latter ranges between 0.91 and 1.32 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 12.91 μm in the specimen collected from Konya while that of the other specimen was measured as 9.06 μm.

Section: Foenum-graecum

Trigonella gladiata Stev. Fischer, 1808, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, T). All chromosome pairs at the somatic metaphase phase were observed to be metacentric. The chromosome length ranges between 2.03 and 4.72 μm. The total haploid chromosome length was measured as 27.70 μm. Trigonella cariensis Boiss. In the specimen collected from İzmir province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, U), and in the specimen collected from Antalya province; 2n=16 (Fig. 1, V). Both specimens have four pairs of metacentric and four pairs of submetacentric chromosomes at somatic metaphase. Of the two specimens, the former has chromosomes whose lengths vary from 2.66 to 3.94 μm with the total haploid chromosome length of 25.28 μm. For the latter, the chromosome length ranges between 3.93 and 6.28 μm, and the total haploid chromosome length was measured as 39.78 μm. In addition, one pair of satellite metaphase chromosomes has been detected in the specimen from Antalya province. Trigonella foenum-graecum L., 1753, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, W), and Trigonella macrorrhyncha Boiss., 1843, 2n=16 (Fig. 1, X). At somatic metaphase, two pairs of metacentric and six pairs of submetacentric chromosomes were observed for both species. For Trigonella foenum-graecum, the chromosome length ranges between 3.03 and 4.84 μm, and the total haploid chromosome length was measured as 30.23 μm. Endemic to Turkey, Trigonella macrorrhyncha has chromosomes varying from 2.23 to 4.40 μm. In this species, the total haploid chromosome length is 25.67 μm. Idiograms of each species were arranged in order of decreasing length (Fig. 2). The total haploid chromosome lengths were given in Table 2, and the information of the 19 species studied were presented in Table 3.

Figure 1. M–X .

Figure 1. M–X

Open in a new tab

Mitotic metaphase chromosomes of Trigonella species M Trigonella spicata N Trigonella cephalotes O B chromosomes (arrow) Trigonella procumbens P Trigonella capitata R Trigonella coerulescens no: 3587 S Trigonella coerulescens no: 3659 T Trigonella gladiata U The satellite (arrow) of chromosomes Trigonella cariensis no: 3332 V Trigonella cariensis no: 4620; W Trigonella foenum-graecum X Trigonella macrorrhyncha.Scale bar = 10 µm.

Table 2.

Chromosome comparison in the examined species of Trigonella (AR: arm ratio; CI: centromeric index; THC: total length of haploid complement; M: metacentric; SM: submetacentric; *one pair of satellites is shown in the chromosome pairs are marked with an asterisk).

Sections and species Chromosomenumbers (2n=2x) Chromosomesizes (µm) AR CI THL(µm) M SM
Section Samaroideae Trigonella cretica 16 0.52–1.01 1.33 5.40 5.88 8 -
Section Pectinatae Trigonella plicata 14 0.84–1.34 1.37 6.06 7.12 7 -
Section Lunatae Trigonella brachycarpa Trigonella rostrata Trigonella lunata* 161416 0.94–1.360.81–1.222.85–3.92 1.261.171.46 5.586.565.12 8.857.0726.44 878 ---
Section Falcatulae Trigonella corniculata Trigonella corniculata Trigonella spinosa 161616 0.61–0.881.54–2.571.49–2.76 1.461.781.99 5.154.594.25 5.7117.5816.76 742 146
Section Reflexae Trigonella monspeliaca Trigonella monspeliaca 1616 0.66–1.180.74–1.00 1.401.50 5.265.11 6.817.06 85 -3
Section Isthmocarpae Trigonella isthmocarpa Trigonella rhytidocarpa 1616 0.57–1.100.85–1.40 1.311.34 5.475.37 6.538.47 88 --
Section Uncinatae Trigonella spicata Trigonella cephalotes 1616 1.00–1.500.43–0.94 1.521.59 5.074.96 10.364.49 55 33
Section Capitatae Trigonella procumbens Trigonella capitata 16+2B16 0.82–1.320.96–1.30 1.311.19 5.435.68 7.759.33 88 --
Section Biebersteinianae Trigonella coerulescens Trigonella coerulescens 1616 1.38–1.910.91–1.32 1.321.25 5.455.62 12.919.06 88 --
Section Foenum-graecum Trigonella gladiata Trigonella cariensis* Trigonella cariensis Trigonella foenum-graecum Trigonella macrorrhyncha 1616161616 2.03–4.722.66–3.943.93–6.283.03–4.842.23–4.40 1.291.831.782.171.85 5.504.594.534.184.37 27.7025.2839.7830.2325.67 84423 -4465
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

The information of the 19 species studied.

Section Species Chromosome number(2n) Chromosome numbers reported (2n) References
Samaroideae Trigonella cretica 16 16 Yılmaz, 2006
Pectinatae Trigonella plicata 14 - -
Lunatae Trigonella brachycarpa 16 - -
“ Trigonella rostrata 14 - -
“ Trigonella lunata 16 - -
Falcatulae Trigonella corniculata 16 16 Tutin, Heywood, 1964
“ Trigonella spinosa 16 16 Bidak, Amin, 1996
Reflexae Trigonella monspeliaca 16 16 Darlington, Wylie, 1955
Isthmocarpae Trigonella isthmocarpa 16 - -
“ Trigonella rhytidocarpa 16 - -
Uncinatae Trigonella spicata 16 - -
“ Trigonella cephalotes 16 - -
Capitatae Trigonella procumbens 16 + 2B 18 Yılmaz, 2006
“ Trigonella capitata 16 - -
Biebersteinianae Trigonella coerulescens 16 16 Yılmaz, 2006
Foenum-graecum Trigonella gladiata 16 16 Bidak, Amin 1996Darlington, Wylie, 1955Ladizinsky, Vosa, 1986
“ Trigonella cariensis 16 16 Ladizinsky, Vosa, 1986
“ Trigonella foenum-graecum 16 16 Ladizinsky, Vosa 1986; Bal, 1990;Tutin, Heywood, 1964
“ Trigonella macrorrhyncha 16 16 Ladizinsky, Vosa, 1986
Open in a new tab

Discussion

1. Basic chromosome number variations

In this karyological study, two different basic chromosome numbers of x=7 and x=8 were observed in the species belonging to ten sections of Trigonella. Bidak and Amin (1996) reported two different basic chromosome numbers of x=8 and x=9 for Trigonella species studied. Among studied species, only two species, Trigonella plicata and Trigonella rostrata, from the sections of Pectinatae and Lunatae, respectively,have the basic chromosome number of x=7.

2. Chromosome number and morphology variations

Two different somatic chromosome numbers (2n=14 and 2n=16) were observed in studied sections. The smallest chromosome length is 0.43 μm measured in Trigonella cephalotes (section Uncinatae) while the biggest of that is 6.28 μm measured in Trigonella cariensis (section Foenum-graecum). The smallest total haploid chromosome length was measured as4.49 μm from the species of Trigonella cephalotes (section Uncinatae). Trigonella cariensis (section Foenum-graecum) has the biggest total haploid chromosome length of 39.78 μm. Trigonella rostrata (section Lunatae) has the smallest arm ratio (1.17), and Trigonella foenum-graecum (section Foenum-graecum) has the biggest (2.17). The smallest centromeric index (4.18) was measured in Trigonella foenum-graecum (section Foenum-graecum) while the biggest of that (6.56) was observed in Trigonella rostrata (section Lunatae). In this study, there is a marked difference in somatic chromosome lengths compared to other species of the section Foenum-graecum. Chromosome numbers are rather close to each other excluding several species (Lunatae, Trigonella corniculata and Trigonella spinosa) in other sections. Besides, 2B chromosome was observed in Trigonella procumbens in the section Capitatae.

Karyotype formulae of the sections of Samaroideae, Pectinatae, Lunatae, Isthmocarpae, Capitatae and Biebersteinianae are completely composed of metacentric chromosome pairs. Karyotype formulae of species in other sections are composed of metacentric and submetacentric chromosome pairs. While there is one pair of satellite metaphase chromosomes in Trigonella lunata (section Lunatae), Trigonella cariensis (section Foenum-graecum) has two pairs of satellite metaphase chromosomes. Section Samaroideae is represented by a single species (Trigonella cretica) in Turkey. The karyotype of this species has been analysed by Yılmaz (2006) reporting the karyotype formulae 2n=16 as in our study. Our results agree with one of the reports of somatic chromosome number of 2n=16 from the same locality (Yılmaz 2006).

Section Pectinatae is represented by a single species (Trigonella plicata) in Turkey. Karyotype analysis of this species has been performed by us for the first time. Section Lunatae is represented by four species (Trigonella brachycarpa, Trigonella rostrata, Trigonella lunata and Trigonella sırjaevii Hub.-Mor., 1939) in Turkey. Making a general evaluation of the section, diploid chromosome numbers were found to be different although the localities of the two types (Trigonella brachycarpa and Trigonella rostrata) in the section were similar. The diploid chromosome number is 2n=16 in Trigonella brachycarpa whereas it is 2n=14 in Trigonella rostrata. The smallest chromosome length of 0.81 μm was measured in Trigonella rostrata in this section while the biggest of that was observed in Trigonella lunata with a length of 3.92 μm. Trigonella rostrata is the species with the smallest arm length of 1.17; however, it is also the species with the biggest centromeric index (6.56). Trigonella lunata is the one with the biggest total haploid chromosome length of 26.44 μm. This length is rather different compared to the species in other sections. Besides, one pair of satellite chromosome has been observed in Trigonella lunata. Karyotype formulae of all species in the section are composed of metacentric chromosome pairs. Trigonella sırjaevii could not been studied due to its inability to be germinated.

Section Falcatulae is represented by two species (Trigonella corniculata and Trigonella spinosa) in Turkey. Trigonella corniculata was studied in two different localities (İzmir and Muğla). In Muğla case, tetraploidy was observed differing from the other. Total haploid chromosome length was measured as 5.71 μm in İzmir province while that was 17.58 μm in Muğla province. It can be stated that the distinction between the karyological values obtained from these two localities resulted from locality differences. In Izmir province, the karyotype formula was 7m+1sm whereas it was set as 4m+4sm in Muğla province. Our diploid counts are in agreement with the literature such as one of the reports from Turkish material and many others from different territories (Tutin and Heywood 1964). From a karyological point of view, to obtain same results from the same species confirms the previous studies. The species of Trigonella spinosa is also placed in the section Falcatulae. Compared with the other species (Trigonella corniculata) of the section, the chromosome number is the same and the chromosome size measured is very close to each other. However, karyotype formulae are different. Karyotype formulae of Trigonella spinosa is 2m+6sm. Bidak et Amin (1996) reported the somatic chromosome numbers as 2n=16 and 18 in Trigonella gladiata, 2n=16 in Trigonella ornithopodiodes, 2n=16 in Trigonella spinosa and 2n=18 in Trigonella stellata.

The section Reflexae is represented by a single species (Trigonella monspeliaca) in Turkey. This species was studied in two different localities. Diploid chromosome numbers are the same (2n=16) in both localities of Trigonella monspeliaca species. The chromosome sizes, total haploid chromosome lengths, arm lengths and centromeric indices are very close to each other while the karyotype formulae are different, i.e. the karyotype formula of Muğla province is 8m, of Antalya province is 5m+3sm. For Darlington and Wylie (1955), in a cytological study conducted on species belonging to Trigonella, diploid chromosome numbers varied from 2n=16 to 2n=32. For example, they are 2n=16 in Trigonella gladiata, 2n=16 in Trigonella monspeliaca, 2n=28, 30 and 2n=32 in Trigonella polyceratia.

The section Isthmocarpae is represented by two species (Trigonella isthmocarpa and Trigonella rhytidocarpa) in Turkey. Karyology of the two species in this section was studied for the first time. The diploid chromosome number of Trigonella isthmocarpa and Trigonella rhytidocarpa species were found to be 2n=16=8m. Karyological characteristics of these two species are very close to each other.

The section Uncinatae is represented by two species (Trigonella spicata and Trigonella cephalotes) in Turkey. The diploid chromosome number of Trigonella spicata and Trigonella cephalotes were found to be 2n=16=5m+3sm. Karyological characteristics of these two species are very close to each other. There is a marked difference only in terms of total haploid chromosome length. While total haploid chromosome length was 10.36 μm in Trigonella spicata, that is 4.49 μm in Trigonella cephalotes. Trigonella cephalotes is also the species having the smallest haploid chromosome length among studied species.

The section Capitatae is represented by three species (Trigonella procumbens, Trigonella capitata and Trigonella pseudocapitata) in Turkey. The diploid chromosome number of Trigonella procumbens and Trigonella capitata was found as 2n=16=8m. Karyological characteristics of these two species are very close to each other. In addition to A chromosomes, two examples of B chromosomes were observed in Trigonella procumbens differing from the other species of the sections studied. The chromosome number of Trigonella procumbens was reported as 2n=18 by Yılmaz (2006) from the same locality, but he did not mention B chromosomes. The other species of the section, Trigonella pseudocapitata,could not be studied due to its inability to germination.

The section Biebersteinianae is represented by Trigonella coerulescens in Turkey. It was studied from two different localities. Diploid chromosome numbers are the same (2n=16=8m) in both localities of Trigonella coerulescens. Chromosome sizes, total haploid chromosome lengths, arm lengths and centromeric indices are very close to each other. The chromosome number of Trigonella coerulescens is in agreement with the previous report (2n=16) by Yılmaz (2006).

The section Foenum-graecum is represented by five species (Trigonella gladiata, Trigonella cariensis, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Trigonella macrorrhyncha and Trigonella cassia) in Turkey. Diploid chromosome numbers of the four species studied in this section are the same (2n=16). Trigonella cassia could not be studied due to failure to germinate. The chromosome morphologies of the species are very close to each other. The karyotype formula of Trigonella gladiata is 8m. In a cytological study performed by Bidak & Amin (1996), diploid chromosome number was found to be 2n=16 and 2n=18 in Trigonella gladiata. Researchers reported two different basic chromosome numbers for this species (x=8 and x=9). However, the basic chromosome number in our study was found to be x=8 for this species. In a cytological study conducted on Trigonella species, Darlington and Wylie (1955) reported that the diploid chromosome numbers varied from 2n=16 to 2n=32. For example, 2n=16 in Trigonella gladiata, 2n=16 in Trigonella monspeliaca, 2n=28, 30 and 32 in Trigonella polyceratia. Somatic chromosome numbers found in our study are parallel with that report. Two double satellite chromosome pairs were observed in a sample collected from Antalya. The sample collected from İzmir has the biggest total haploid chromosome length (39.78 μm) among all sections. has diploid chromosome number of 2n=16 as in other species in the section. The karyotype formula is 2m+6sm. Trigonella foenum-graecum is the species with the biggest arm ratio in all sections (2.17). Chromosome numbers of only two Trigonella species were reported in European Flora records, Trigonella corniculata 2n=16 and Trigonella foenum-graecum 2n=16 (Tutin and Heywood 1964). Our results obtained from this study agree with that report. In a study on karyotype analysis of Trigonella foeanum-graecum, somatic chromosome numbers were found to be similar to that of our study (Bal, 1990). The diploid chromosome number of Trigonella macrorrhyncha is 2n=16 as in all other species in the section. The karyotype formula is 3m+5sm. In another study conducted in six different species (Trigonella gladiata, Trigonella cariensis, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Trigonella berythea, Trigonella macrorrhyncha and Trigonella cassia) of the section Foenum-graecum, diploid chromosome numbers were reported as 2n=16 (Ladizinsky and Vosa, 1986). In this case, our counts agree with the previous study. It is considered that the results obtained from this karyological study have contributed to the taxonomical revision of the genus Trigonella.

Acknowledgements

We thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) (Project no. TBAG–2099 (101T142) and Scientific Investigation Project Coordinate of Selçuk University (project no: 05401046) for financial support.

References

  1. Agarwal K, Gupta PK. (1983) Cytological studies in the genus Trigonella L. Cytologia 48: 771–779 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Habori M, Al-Ahhbari AM, Al-Mamary M. (1998) Effects of fenugreek seeds and its extracts on plasma lipid profile: A study on rabbits. Phytotherapy Research 12:572-575 [Google Scholar]
  3. Astanova SB. (1981) Chromosome numbers of Leguminosae of Flora in Tajikistan, (pp. 24: 61- 63) Dokl. Akad. Nauk Tadziksk. SSR.
  4. Bal Ş. (1990)Trigonella foeanum-graecum’da karyotip analizleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum BR. (1968) A classification of the generic limits of Trigonella and Medicago. Canadian Journal of Botany 46:741-749 doi:10.1139/b68-102 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bidak L, Amin AW. (1996) Inter-and intraspecific chromosomal variations in four species of Trigonella L. Journal Union Arab Biology 3:203-215 [Google Scholar]
  7. Classen D, Nozzolillo C, Small E. (1982) A phenolic-taxometric study of Medicago (Leguminosae). Canadian Journal of Botany 60:2477-2495 doi:10.1139/b82-301 [Google Scholar]
  8. Danin A, Small E. (1989)Contributions to the flora of Israel and Sinae. V. Trigonella sibthorpii Boiss., a new record from Israel. Israel Journal of Botany 38:121-124 [Google Scholar]
  9. Darlington CD, Wylie AP. (1955) Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. London: Allen & Unwin Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Duke AJ. (1986)Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Importance. Plemus Press, New York and London [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghosh AK. (1980) Chromosome number of Trigonella spinosa. Current Science 49:154-155 [Google Scholar]
  12. Huber-Murath A. (1970) Trigonella L. In Davis PH (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press 3:452-482 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ladizinsky G, Vosa CG. (1986) Localization and activity of rRNA genes on fenugreek(Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) chromosomes by fluorescent in situ hybridization and silver staining. Plant Systematics and Evolution: 1–5 doi:10.1007/BF00989412
  14. Mabberly DJ. (1997) The plant-book: A Portable Dictionary of the Higher Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin E, Akan H, Ekici M, Aytac Z. (2008) Karyomorphological studies on section Bucerates Boiss. of Trigonella L. (Leguminosae) from Turkey. Caryologia 61:225-236 [Google Scholar]
  16. Meusel H, Jager E. (1962) Über die Verbreitung einiger Papilionacean-Gattun. Kulturpflanze Beih 3: 249–262 Turkey/Distr. of genera Leg.: Lotus, Medicago, Onobrychis, Ononis, Trifolium, Trigonella/Germ. [Google Scholar]
  17. Murakami T, Kishi A, Matsuda H. (2000) Medicinal foodstuffs. 17. Fenugreek seed. (3): Structures of new furostanol-type steroid saponins, trigoneosides 10a, 10b, 11b, 12a, 12 bands 13a from the seeds of Egyptian Trigonella foenum-graceum L. Chemical Pharmaceutical Bulletin 48:994-1000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oncina R, Botia JM, Del Rio JA, Ortuna A. (2000)Bioproduction of diosgenin incallus cultures of Trigonella foenum-graecum L.Departemento de Biologia Vegetal, Facultad de Biologia, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
  19. Pavlova D. (1996) Mediterranean chromosome number reports 6 (762–766). Flora Mediterranea 6:323-328 [Google Scholar]
  20. Petropoulos GA. (2002) Fenugreek, the Genus Trigonella, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants-Indutsrial Profiles. TJ International Ltd., Padstow, Cornwall [Google Scholar]
  21. Ram D, Verma JP. (2000) Effect of level of phosporus and potash on the performance of seedvield of “Pusa Early bunching” fenugreek(Trigonella foenum-graceum). Indian Journal of Agriculture 12:866-868 [Google Scholar]
  22. Sabir DM, Hussain FHS, Zewar JB. (2002) Seperation and characterisation of fenugreek seeds proteins. Deut lebensm-rundsch 1:14-16 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheoran RS, Sharma HC, Niwas R. (1999) Thermal efficiency of fenugreek(Trigonella foenum-graceum) genotypes under different sowing environments and phosphoruslevels. Indian Journal of Agriculture 12:830-832 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sırjaev G. (1935) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Gattung Trigonella (Suppl. Ad “Generis Trigonella revisio critica”). Bull. Assoc. Russe. Rech. Sci. Prague 9:135-162 [Google Scholar]
  25. Small E. (1988) Pollen-ovule patterns in tribe Trifolieae (Leguminosae). Plant Systematics of Evolution 160:195-205 doi:10.1007/BF00936047 [Google Scholar]
  26. Small E, Crompton CW, Brookes B. (1981) The taxonomic value of floral characters in tribe Trigonelleae (Leguminosae), with special reference to Medicago. Canadian Journal of Botany 59:1578-1598 doi:10.1139/b81-216 [Google Scholar]
  27. Small E, Jomphe M. (1989) A note on Trigonella (Melilotus) bicolor. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:1604-1606 doi:10.1139/b89-201 [Google Scholar]
  28. Small E, Lefkovitch LP, Brookes B. (1981) Remarkable asymmetries in trifoliolate leaves with particular reference to Medicago. Canadian Journal of Botany 59:662-671 doi:10.1139/b81-093 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sur P, Das MA, Gomes Vedasiromoni JR, Sahu NP, Banarjee S, Sharma RM, Ganguly DK. (2001) Trigonella foenum graceum (Fenugreek) Seed extract as an Antineoplastic Agent. Phytotherapy Research 3:257-259 doi:10.1002/ptr.718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tutin TG, Heywood VH. (1964) Flora Europaea, I & II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Google Scholar]
  31. Yılmaz A, Martin E, Ünal F, Akan H. (2009) Karyological study on six Trigonella L. species (Leguminosae) in Turkey. Caryologia 62:89-94 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative Cytogenetics are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES