Abstract
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a complex process in which epithelial cells acquire the characteristics of invasive mesenchymal cells. EMT has been implicated in cancer progression and metastasis as well as the formation of many tissues and organs during development. Epithelial cells undergoing EMT lose cell-cell adhesion structures and polarity, and rearrange their cytoskeletons. Several oncogenic pathways such as transforming growth factor (TGF) -β, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways, have been shown to induce EMT. These pathways have activated transcription factors including Snail, Slug, and the ZEB family which work as transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin, thereby making epithelial cells motile and resistant to apoptosis. Mounting evidence shows that EMT is associated with cell invasion and tumor progression.In this review, we summarize the characteristic features of EMT, pathways leading to EMT, and the role of EMT in cell invasion. Three topics are addressed in this review: (1) Definition of EMT, (2) Signaling pathways leading to EMT, (3) Role of EMT in cell invasion. Understanding the role of EMT in cell invasion will provide valuable information for establishing strategies to develop anti-metastatic therapeutics which modulate malignant cellular processes mediated by EMT.
Keywords: EMT, cell invasion, TGF-β, Wnt, Notch
INTRODUCTION
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a central process required for normal embryonic development. Recent evidence suggests roles of EMT for pathological conditions such as cancer progression, fibrosis, and chronic inflammation (Thiery, 2002, 2003; Grunert et al., 2003; Kalluri and Neilson, 2003; Balkwill, 2004) . Multi-step processes and various oncogenic signaling pathways are involved in EMT (Derynck and Zhang, 2003; Larue and Bellacosa, 2005; Yee et al., 2010). Conditions where epithelial cells are transformed to a mesenchymal phenotype usually have poor clinical outcomes. The acquisition of EMT features correlates with carcinogenesis, invasion, metastasis, poor survival and an increased risk of cancer recurrence among patients with various solid tumor types, including breast (Trimboli et al., 2008) , bladder (Adam et al., 2009) , gastric (Kim et al., 2009) , and colon cancer (Brabletz et al., 2005).
These findings suggest that EMT is required for cell invasion involved in cancer progression.
The present review highlights the current understanding of the role of EMT in cell invasion. The following topics are addressed in this review. (1) Definition of EMT - EMT consists of multiple steps in which epithelial cells lose epithelial-specific features and acquire fibroblastoid and mesenchymal features. (2) Pathways leading to EMT - Diverse signaling pathways are responsible for regulation of EMT.Mainly, TGF-β, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways lead to EMT. (3) Role of EMT in cell invasion - Tumor cell invasion is necessary for the malignant progression of cancer and EMT is considered as a crucial event in developing invasive potential (Comijn et al., 2001; Christiansen and Rajasekaran, 2006; Lewis-Tuffin et al., 2010; Vuoriluoto et al., 2010). Recent studies on the correlation between EMT and tumor cell invasion are discussed in this review.
Definition of EMT.
EMT-associated changes of cell phenotype in embryonic and adult epithelia were first proposed by Trelstad’s group and Hay’s group (Trelstad et al.,1967; Hay, 1968). In the 1980s, the mesenchymal transformation of early epithelial cells during development was confirmed in chick embryonic lens epithelium (Greenburg and Hey, 1982, 1986) . The process of EMT is composed of multiple steps (Voulgari and Pintzas, 2009; Zavadil and Bottinger, 2005). During EMT, epithelial cells undergo dramatic changes. Epithelial cells lose epithelial cell-specific phenotypes and develop features of mesenchymal cells.Tight- and adherens-junction proteins such as E-cadherin and α-catenin are downregulated and mesenchymal cellspecific marker proteins including N-cadherin, vimentin, and fibronectin are upregulated (Grunert et al., 2003; Christofori,2006). Subsequently, epithelial cells lose cell-cell adhesion structures and polarity and then obtain cell motility and invasiveness. Finally, epithelial cells undergoing EMT digest and migrate through the extracellular matrix (ECM) and acquire motile and invasive characteristics (Cordon-Cardo and Prives, 1999; Thiery, 2002; Hay, 2005).
Epithelial cells function as an important barrier (Peinado et al., 2007) . E-cadherin is a hallmark of epithelial cells,and is encoded by the CDH1 gene (Ghoul et al., 2009; Humar et al., 2009). This protein is localized at the basolateral membrane in adherens-junctions (Perez-Moreno et al., 2003) , leading to the cell-cell adhesion (Peinado et al., 2007; Roger et al., 2010). Transcription factors involved in EMT such as Snail, Slug, TWIST, and the ZEB family mainly repress expression of E-cadherin during EMT (Batlle et al., 2000; Cano et al., 2000; Takkunen et al.,2006; Yee et al., 2010).
EMT is associated with intracellular events including embryonic development, wound healing, organ development,and cancer progression (Thiery, 2002, 2003; Grunert et al., 2003; Peinado et al., 2007) . Many processes which occur in embryonic development and tissue repair in adult organisms might cause epithelial cells to lose their polarized phenotype.Redistribution of tight-, adherens-junction proteins and migration/scattering of cells occurs when epithelial cells lose of their polarity during many developmental processes.These phenomena are observed in several normal processes including tubulogenesis and branching in the mammary gland, or mesoderm formation; gastrulation, kidney and palate development (reviewed in Grunert et al., 2003) .
EMT is controlled by several transcriptional repressors including Snail, Slug, TWIST, and the ZEB family that recruit histone deacetylases to E-box elements that are located in the E-cadherine promoter and a variety of other genes (Peinado et al., 2007). In general, EMT is very complex and strictly controlled in temporal and spatial fashions to ensure proper homing and reversion of cells to non-invasive phenotypes after migration to a destined location and to prevent abnormal development (Hay, 1995; Oft et al., 1998; Brabletz et al., 2001) . Cancer cells undergoing EMT lose proper target recognition and activate self-sufficient autocrine loops of growth signals to avoid apoptosis (reviewed in Gotzmann et al., 2004).
Signaling pathways leading to EMT.
The key signaling pathways which induce EMT include the TGF-β, Wnt,and Notch signaling pathways. Many of the EMT-inducing pathways control transcription factors of the Snail family (Snail, SLUG) and the ZEB family (ZEB1/2) as well as TWIST which repress expression of E-cadherin (Batlle et al., 2000; Cano et al., 2000; Takkunen et al., 2006; Yee et al., 2010) . Here, we summarize the signaling pathways that contribute to the regulation of EMT.
TGF-β signaling pathway:
TGF-β is a known multifunctional cytokine, which triggers diverse cellular processes including growth arrest, tissue fibrosis, and EMT (Piek et al., 1999; Moustakas and Heldin, 2007; Schilling et al., 2008). To activate TGF-β signaling pathways, TGF-βbinds to TGF-β type II (TβRII) and type I (TβRI) serine/threonine kinase receptors, respectively. TβRII binding to TGF-β transphosphorylates TβRI and the activated TβRI in turn activates R-Smads (Smad2 and Smad3) via phosphorylation at their C-terminal serine residues. As a result, activated R-Smads form a heterocomplex with Smad4 and translocate into the nucleus to regulate gene expression (Akiyoshi et al., 1999; Heldin et al., 1997; Nishihara et al., 1998; Massague and Chen, 2000; Feng and Derynck, 2005).These pathways are termed Smad-dependent pathways. In addition to the Smad signaling pathways, TGF-β also elicits diverse types of non-Smad signaling pathways. Among them, activation of Ras, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as ERK and p38 MAPK, Rho GTPases, and PI3K/Akt signaling has been linked to TGF-β-induced EMT (Bakin et al., 2000, 2002; Xie et al., 2004; Tavares et al., 2006). These pathways regulate distinct processes including cytoskeleton organization, cell survival, migration, and invasion. Recent studies have shown a crucial role for TGF-β signaling pathways that induce EMT through the Smaddependent and Smad-independent pathways (Derynck and Zhang, 2003; Davies et al., 2005; Moustakas and Heldin,2005; Valcourt et al., 2005).
[Smad pathway] Many studies have investigated the roles of the Smad-dependent pathway in TGF-β-induced EMT.When expression of Smad2 or Smad3 was downregulated by a dominant negative mutant, induction of EMT in response to the TGF-β-mediated Smad pathway was blocked in NMuMG cell system (Valcourt et al., 2005). Smad3 is a more important factor than Smad2 in the induction of EMT. Smad3-deficient renal tubular epithelial cells and Smad3-/- lens epithelial cells fail to undergo TGF-β-induced EMT (Sato et al., 2003; Saika et al., 2004). In contrast, effects of Smad2 on induction of EMT are controversial. In some cases, Smad2 has negative effects on EMT and cancer progression,e.g., Smad2 deficiency promotes skin tumor formation and EMT in human skin cancer patients and Smad2-lacking keratinocytes (Hoot et al., 2008) , and Smad2-/- hepatocytes develop mesenchymal characteristics and migratory capability (Ju et al., 2006).
[Non-Smad pathways] Numerous studies have demonstrated that TGF-β also induces EMT via non-Smad pathways,including the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK, p38 MAPK, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways.
< Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway>
When TβRI receptor is activated by TGF-β, it phosphorylates Shc, which offers a docking site for the recruitment of Grb2/Sos complex. Phosphorylated Shc forms a complex with Grb2/Sos. Shc/Grb2/Sos complex initiates activation of the Ras signaling cascade (Lee et al., 2007). Many observations support a collaboration of TGF-β with the Ras-Raf-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway. Hyper-activated Ras-ERK1/2 pathway due to expression of mutant Ras enhances TGF-β-induced EMT through the loss of epithelial cell-specific features such as the downregulation of E-cadherin expression (Lehmann et al., 2000; Grande et al., 2002; Uttamsingh et al., 2008). Consistent with this observation, MEK1/2, an upstream kinase of ERK1/2, induces activation of ERK1/2 and enhances TGF-β-mediated transcription processes (Grande et al., 2002; Uttamsingh et al., 2008). This cooperation was confirmed by using an inhibitor to block the kinase function of MEK1/2. Activations of ERK1/2 and TGF-β-induced EMT were blocked using a chemical inhibitor of MEK1/2 (Xie et al., 2004).
< p38 MAPK pathway>
TGF-β also triggers phosphorylation of p38 MAPK as well as MKK3/6 and TAK1, which is an activator of MKK3/6 (Santibanez, 2006). Several studies have demonstrated that an inhibitor of p38 MAPK blocks TGF-β-induced EMT in mammary epithelial cells (Bakin et al., 2002; Yu et al., 2002). The Ras-Rac signaling pathway induces several transcription factors such as Elk-1 and ATF2 through the MKK3/6-p38 MAPK pathways. Eventually, this signaling pathway upregulates expression of Snail-activator for EMT (reviewed in Nawshad et al., 2005). In addition to the Ras-MKK3/6-p38 MAPK pathway, TAK1 activates the MKK4-JNK pathway in TGF-β-induced EMT. Accordingly,blocking of JNK activation using a chemical inhibitor prevents expression of proteins associated with TGF-β-induced EMT such as fibronectin and vimentin (Santibanez, 2006).
< PI3K/Akt signaling pathway>
TGF-β induces the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway during EMT in many cell systems (Bakin et al., 2000; Lien et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2007). Consistent with this observation, TβRII and TβRI receptors interact with PI3K, and thus TGF-β stimulates PI3K activity (Yi et al., 2005). The PI3K/Akt pathway has been linked to diverse cellular events including cell growth, survival, proliferation, and motility.A PI3K/Akt downstream effector, mTOR, activates S6 kinase 1 during EMT (Lamouille and Derynck, 2007; Sarbassov et al., 2005). In turn, S6 kinase 1 regulates the translational machinery, thereby increasing protein synthesis and cell size. S6 kinase 1 is required for the Snail expression (Pon et al., 2008). Additionally, several studies have demonstrated that the PI3K/Akt pathway is associated with TGF-β-induced Smad2 phosphorylation, but not with Smad3 phosphorylation (Lamouille and Derynck, 2007; Bakin et al., 2000). However, the roles of the PI3K/Akt pathway in EMT are not fully understood at present.
Wnt signaling pathway:
The Wnt pathway has been implicated in EMT during embryonic development and cancer progression as summarized in several recent reviews (Huber et al., 2005; Larue and Bellacosa, 2005; Xu et al., 2009) . In the absence of a Wnt signal, β-catenin is phosphorylated by GSK3 and then undergoes ubiquitin-dependent degradation. This system helps to maintain cytoplasmic β-catenin at a low level. When the Wnt signaling pathway is activated, cytoplasmic β-catenin is accumulated in the nucleus,where it associates with a transcription factor (TCF/LEF) and promotes the expression of target genes involved in EMT. β-catenin/TCF targets Slug (Conacci-Sorrell et al., 2003) and stabilizes Snail through blocking of its phosphorylation and degradation (Yook et al., 2005).
Mounting studies have documented that the Wnt signaling pathway cooperates with the TGF-β and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways in the context of EMT. For example, Smad2 and Smad4 form a complex with LEF, resulting in repression of E-cadherin gene expression in palate medialedge epithelial cells. In addition, Smad4 and LEF induce mesenchymal features such as upregulation of fibronectin and vimentin, and the acquisition of migratory capacity (Nawshad et al., 2007). At the same time, the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway stabilizes β-catenin through blocking activation of GSK3 (Zhou et al., 2004).
Notch signaling pathway:
Notch is critical for regulation of cell-cell communication during embryonic development and cancer progression. However, the function of the Notch signaling pathway in EMT is not currently understood.The Notch signaling pathway is activated via ligandreceptor interactions between neighboring cells. In turn, Notch is cleaved by proteases, and then the intracellular cleaved form, Notch intracellular domain (NIC) , releases from its membrane anchoring. Upon activation, the NIC translocates into the nucleus, where it binds to the transcription factor CSL which upregulates Hey1, a well-known target gene of Notch signaling, and Snail (Timmerman et al., 2004; Zavadil et al., 2004). The Notch signaling pathway crosstalks with the TGF-β pathway. Hey1 is required for TGF-β-induced EMT and migration in epithelial cells (Zavadil et al., 2004).
Role of EMT in cell invasion.
Metastasis, the major cause of death in cancer patients, is the spread of a tumor from its primary site to other location in the body. Cell invasion has been recognized as a key step in metastasis and results from various factors and oncogenic signaling pathways which overlap with EMT-inducing pathways (Boyer et al., 2000). Cancer cells undergoing EMT generally lose proper target recognition and activate self-sufficient autocrine loops of growth signals - mechanisms to avoid apoptosis (reviewed in Gotzmann et al., 2004). It has been documented that cell invasion during cancer progression may be critically dependent on the acquisition of EMT features (Kang and Massague, 2004; Thiery and Morgan, 2004). These findings suggest that EMT is associated with cell invasion involved in cancer malignancy.
The association between EMT and cell invasion has been demonstrated in cancer progression. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) , especially, MMP-2 and -9, are deeply involved in invasion and metastasis. Increased enzymatic degradation of extracellular matrix components by MMPs induces cell invasion and tumor spread (Platten et al., 2001; Wick et al., 2001). Studies suggest that MMPs stimulate EMT and that EMT produces MMPs (reviewed in Radisky and Radisky, 2010). In addition, signaling pathways involved in EMT, such as TGF-β, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways are associated with cancer progression.
MMPs are an important mediator of various cellular events,including ECM degradation and remodeling, cell proliferation,apoptosis, cell invasion/migration and morphological change (Sternlicht and Werb, 2001). MMPs act in malignant cancer progression through degradation of ECM, stimulation of EMT and the induction of cell invasion (Kim et al., 2003; Duong and Erickson, 2004; Illman et al., 2006; Song et al., 2006). Each of the MMPs has a different substrate,for example, MMP-1, -8, and -13 are collagen-cleaving MMPs, while MMP-2 and -9 are gelatin-cleaving MMPs (reviewed in Snoek-van Beurden and Von den Hoff, 2005).Increased expression of MMPs has been suggested as a marker for tumor aggressiveness in breast, lung, pancreatic,and prostate cancers (Jones et al., 2004; Morgia et al., 2005; Somiari et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2007).
Recent studies have shown that MMPs stimulate EMT in various epithelial cell types, including kidney, ovary, lung,prostate, lens and breast epithelial cells (reviewed in Radisky and Radisky, 2010). According to several findings,MMPs are implicated in EMT during cancer progression via three mechanisms: (a) increased MMPs in the tumor microenvironment can directly induce EMT in epithelial cells, (b) cancer cells undergoing EMT can produce more MMPs and then facilitate cell invasion, and (c) epithelial cells can undergo EMT through further MMP production.For example, overexpression of MMP-7, 28 induces stable EMT in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells (McGuire et al., 2003; Illman et al., 2006) , and MMP-3 in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and SCp2 mouse mammary epithelial cells (Noel et al., 2000; Radisky et al., 2005). MMP-2 becomes activated in neural cells undergoing EMT (Duong and Erickson, 2004) and MMP inhibitors block mesenchyme formation (Song et al., 2000).
Recent studies suggest that microRNA (miRNA, miR) is associated with EMT (reviewed in Zavadil et al., 2007; McConkey et al., 2009). miRNAs have been known as noncoding RNAs which act as post-transcriptional repressors of gene functions through translation inhibition and degradation of target mRNAs. miRNAs are often deregulated in diseases such as cancer. Several findings have shown that the miR-200 family plays a critical role in EMT through regulation of ZEB family levels. Interestingly, the ZEB family can also repress the miR-200 family. When the miR-200 family is downregulated by the ZEB family, E-cadherin expression is suppressed and cell motility and invasiveness are increased. These feedback loops are in place to fine-tune EMT-related signaling. Recently, Zavadil et al. (2007) revealed a novel EMT-specific microRNA, miR-21,which is a candidate oncogenic microRNA associated with carcinogenesis.
Further functional studies on the interactions of MMP, miRNA and EMT may provide promising therapeutic approaches for the treatment of cancer. The above mentioned pathways leading to EMT, and crosstalk among these pathways can promote cell invasion and the progression of malignant cancer (Reiss and Barcellos-Hoff, 1997; Taki et al., 2003; Brabletz et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2005; Larue and Bellacosa, 2005; Wang et al., 2006).
CONCLUSIONS
Cancer cell invasion is a major factor and the first step in cancer metastasis which is the feature of malignant tumors resulting in dissemination of primary tumor cells to distant organs. To develop effective treatments for invasion and substantially improve patient prognosis, we need to understand the mechanism of cancer cell invasion and identify potential therapeutic targets related to metastasis.
Mounting evidence shows that EMT has been linked to an invasive phenotype as well as solid tumor progress (reviewed in Micalizzi et al., 2010). EMT promotes malignancy in various cancer types including prostate, gastric, bladder, lung and breast cancer. Epithelial cells change their phenotype and acquire features of mesenchymal cells in a cancer microenvironment via EMT. Since EMT plays a key role in tumor cell invasion and cancer metastasis, establishing strategies to control EMT-inducing signaling should be a high priority for the development of anti-metastatic therapeutics.
In this review, we summarized a portion of recent findings on EMT-inducing signaling and discussed how EMT facilitates cell invasion and cancer progression. EMT is induced through diverse signaling pathways, including the TGF-β, PI3K/Akt, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways.These signaling pathways crosstalk with each other and then facilitate EMT and cell invasion.
Although much is known about the functions of EMT in cell invasion, more must be understood to provide detailed information on the molecular mechanisms leading to an invasive phenotype. Understanding the relationship between EMT and cell invasion might provide useful information that can lead to the future development of novel targets for prognosis and/or therapy of cancer progression.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a 2009 Duksung Women’s University Research Grant.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: EMT (Epithelial-mesenchymal transition) , TGF-β (Transforming growth factor β) , MMP (Matrix metalloproteinase) , ECM (Extracellular matrix) , MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) , miRNA/miR (microRNA)
References
- 1.Adam L. Zhong M. Choi W. Qi W. Nicoloso M. Arora A. Calin G. Wang H. Siefker-Radtke A. McConkey D. Bar-Eli M. Dinney C. miR-200 expression regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in bladder cancer cells and reverses resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:5060–5072. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Akiyoshi S. Inoue H. Hanai J. Kusanagi K. Nemoto N. Miyazono K. Kawabata M. c-Ski acts as a transcriptional co-repressor in transforming growth factor-beta signaling through interaction with smads. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:35269–35277. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.49.35269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bakin A.V. Rinehart C. Tomlinson A.K. Arteaga C.L. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for TGFβ-mediated fibroblastic transdifferentiation and cell migration. J.Cell Sci. 2002;115:3193–3206. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.15.3193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bakin A.V. Tomlinsos A.K. Bhowmick N.A. Moses H.L. Arteaga C.L. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function is required for transforming growth factor-beta-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell migration. J. Biol.Chem. 2000;275:36803–36810. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005912200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Balkwill F. Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat. Rev.Cancer. 2004;4:540–550. doi: 10.1038/nrc1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Batlle E. Sancho E. Franci C. Dominguez D. Monfar M. Baulida J. Garcia De Herreros A. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:84–89. doi: 10.1038/35000034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boyer B. Valles A.M. Edme N. Induction and regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000;60:1091–1099. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(00)00427-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brabletz T. Hlubek F. Spaderna S. Schmalhofer O. Hiendlmeyer E. Jung A. Kirchner T. Invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer: epithelial-mesenchymal transition mesenchymal-epithelial transition stem cells and beta-catenin. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;179:56–65. doi: 10.1159/000084509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brabletz T. Jung A. Reu S. Porzner M. Hlubek F. Kunz-Schughart L.A. Knuechel R. Kirchner T. Variable beta-catenin expression in colorectal cancers indicates tumor progression driven by the tumor environment. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. 2001;98:10356–10361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.171610498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cano A. Perez-Moreno M.A. Rodrigo I. Locascio A. Blanco M.J. del Barrio M.G. Portillo F. Nieto M.A. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:76–83. doi: 10.1038/35000025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Christiansen J.J. Rajasekaran A.K. Reassessing epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a prerequisite for carcinoma invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8319–8326. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Christofori G. New signals from the invasive front. Nature. 2006;441:444–450. doi: 10.1038/nature04872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Comijn J. Berx G. Vermassen P. Verschueren K. van Grunsven L. Bruyneel E. Mareel M. Huylebroeck D. van Roy F. The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:1267–1278. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00260-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Conacci-Sorrell M. Simcha I. Ben-Yedidia T. Blechman J. Savagner P. Ben-Ze;ev A. Autoregulation of Ecadherin expression by cadherin-cadherin interactions: the roles of beta-catenin signaling Slug and MAPK. J. Cell Biol. 2003;163:847–857. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200308162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cordon-Cardo C. Prives C. At the crossroads of inflammation and tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Med. 1999;190:1367–1370. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.10.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Davies M. Robinson M. Smith E. Huntley S. Prime S. Paterson I. Induction of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human immortal and malignant keratinocytes by TGF-beta1 involves MAPK Smad and AP-1 signalling pathways. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005;95:918–931. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Derynck R. Zhang Y.E. Smad-dependent and Smadindependent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature. 2003;425:577–584. doi: 10.1038/nature02006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duong T.D. Erickson C.A. MMP-2 plays an essential role in producing epithelial-mesenchymal transformations in the avian embryo. Dev. Dyn. 2004;229:42–53. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Feng X.H. Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in TGF-beta signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2005;21:659–693. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ghoul A. Serova M. Astorgues-Xerri L. Bieche I. Bousquet G. Varna M. Vidaud M. Phillips E. Weill S. Benhadji K.A. Lokiec F. Cvitkovic E. Faivre S. Raymond E. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and resistance to ingenol 3-angelate a novel protein kinase C modulator in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4260–4269. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gotzmann J. Mikula M. Eger A. Schulte-Hermann R. Foisner R. Beug H. Mikulits W. Molecular aspects of epithelial cell plasticity: implications for local tumor invasion and metastasis. Mutat. Res. 2004;566:9–20. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5742(03)00033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grande M. Franzen A. Karlsson J.O. Ericson L.E. Heldin N.E. Nilsson M. Transforming growth factor-beta and epidermal growth factor synergistically stimulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) through a MEK-dependent mechanism in primary cultured pig thyrocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115:4227–4236. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Greenburg G. Hay E.D. Epithelia suspended in collagen gels can lose polarity and express characteristics of migrating mesenchymal cells. J. Cell Biol. 1982;95:333–339. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Greenburg G. Hay E.D. Cytodifferentiation and tissue phenotype change during transformation of embryonic lens epithelium to mesenchyme-like cells in vitro. Dev. Biol. 1986;115:363–379. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90256-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grunert S. Jechlinger M. Beug H. Diverse cellular and molecular mechanisms contribute to epithelial plasticity and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;4:657–665. doi: 10.1038/nrm1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hay E.D. Organization and fine structure of epithelium and mesenchyme in the developing chick embryo. In Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions; 18th Hahnemann Symposium (Eds. R. Fleischmajer & R.E. Billingham) Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore: 1968. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hay E.D. An overview of epithelio-mesenchymal transformation. Acta. Anat. 1995;154:8–20. doi: 10.1159/000147748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hay E.D. The mesenchymal cell its role in the embryo and the remarkable signaling mechanisms that create it. Dev. Dyn. 2005;233:706–720. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Heldin C.H. Miyazono K. ten Dijke P. TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature. 1997;390:465–471. doi: 10.1038/37284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hoot K.E. Lighthall J. Han G. Lu S.L. Li A. Ju W. Kulesz-Martin M. Bottinger E. Wang X.J. Keratinocytespecific Smad2 ablation results in increased epithelialmesenchymal transition during skin cancer formation and progression. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;118:2722–2732. doi: 10.1172/JCI33713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huber M.A. Kraut N. Beug H. Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2005;17:548–558. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Humar B. Blair V. Charlton A. More H. Martin I. Guilford P. E-cadherin deficiency initiates gastric signetring cell carcinoma in mice and man. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2050–2056. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Illman S.A. Lehti K. Keski-Oja J. Lohi J. Epilysin (MMP-28) induces TGF-beta mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition in lung carcinoma cells. J. Cell Sci. 2006;119:3856–3865. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jones L.E. Humphreys M.J. Campbell F. Neoptolemos J.P. Boyd M.T. Comprehensive analysis of matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor expression in pancreatic cancer: increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 predicts poor survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:2832–2845. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1157-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ju W. Ogawa A. Heyer J. Nierhof D. Yu L. Kucherlapati R. Shafritz D.A. Bottinger E.P. Deletion of Smad2 in mouse liver reveals novel functions in hepatocyte growth and differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:654–667. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.2.654-667.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kalluri R. Neilson E.G. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;112:1776–1784. doi: 10.1172/JCI20530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kang Y. Massague J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 2004;118:277–279. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim E.S. Kim M.S. Moon A. Transforming growth factor (TGF) -beta in conjunction with H-ras activation promotes malignant progression of MCF10A breast epithelial cells. Cytokine. 2005;29:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim M.S. Lee E.J. Kim H.R. Moon A. p38 kinase is a key signaling molecule for H-Ras-induced cell motility and invasive phenotype in human breast epithelial cells. Res. 2003;63:5454–5461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim M.A. Lee H.S. Lee H.E. Kim J.H. Yang H.K. Kim W.H. Prognostic importance of epithelial-mesenchymal-related protein expression in gastric carcinoma. Histopathology. 2009;54:442–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lamouille S. Derynck R. Cell size and invasion in TGF-β-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition is regulated by activation of the mTOR pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2007;178:437–451. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200611146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Larue L. Bellacosa A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in development and cancer: role of phosphatidylinositol 3' kinase/AKT pathways. Oncogene. 2005;24:7443–7454. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lee M.K. Pardoux C. Hall M.C. Lee P.S. Warburton D. Qing J. Smith S.M. Derynck R. TGF-beta activates Erk MAP kinase signalling through direct phosphorylation of ShcA. EMBO J. 2007;26:3957–3967. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lehmann K. Janda E. Pierreux C.E. Rytomaa M. Schulze A. McMahon M. Hill C.S. Beug H. Downward J. Raf induces TGFbeta production while blocking its apoptotic but not invasive responses: a mechanism leading to increased malignancy in epithelial cells. Genes. Dev. 2000;14:2610–2622. doi: 10.1101/gad.181700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lewis-Tuffin L.J. Rodriguez F. Giannini C. Scheithauer B. Necela B.M. Sarkaria J.N. Anastasiadis P.Z. Misregulated E-cadherin expression associated with an aggressivebrain tumor phenotype. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lien S.C. Usami S. Chien S. Chiu J.J. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway is involved in transforming growth factor-beta1-induced phenotypic modulation of 10T1/2 cells to smooth muscle cells. Cell. Signal. 2006;18:1270–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lin C.C. Chiang L.L. Lin C.H. Shih C.H. Liao Y.T. Hsu M.J. Chen B.C. Transforming growth factor-beta1 stimulates heme oxygenase-1 expression via the PI3K/Akt and NF-kappaB pathways in human lung epithelial cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007;560:101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu D. Nakano J. Ishikawa S. Yokomise H. Ueno M. Kadota K. Urushihara M. Huang C.L. Overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) correlates with tumor proliferation and a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007;58:384–391. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Massague J. Chen Y.G. Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes. Dev. 2000;14:627–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McConkey D.J. Choi W. Marquis L. Martin F. Williams M.B. Shah J. Svatek R. Das A. Adam L. Kamat A. Siefker-Radtke A. Dinney C. Role of epithelial-tomesenchymal transition (EMT) in drug sensitivity and metastasis in bladder cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28:335–344. doi: 10.1007/s10555-009-9194-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McGuire J.K. Li Q. Parks W.C. Matrilysin (matrix metalloproteinase-7) mediates E-cadherin ectodomain shedding in injured lung epithelium. Am. J. Pathol. 2003;162:1831–1843. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64318-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Micalizzi D.S. Farabaugh S.M. Ford H.L. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2010;15:117–134. doi: 10.1007/s10911-010-9178-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Morgia G. Falsaperla M. Malaponte G. Madonia M. Indelicato M. Travali S. Mazzarino M.C. Matrix metalloproteinases as diagnostic (MMP-13) and prognostic (MMP-2 MMP-9) markers of prostate cancer. Urol. Res. 2005;33:44–50. doi: 10.1007/s00240-004-0440-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moustakas A. Heldin C.H. Non-Smad TGF-beta signals. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:3573–3584. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Moustakas A. Heldin C.H. Signaling networks guiding epithelial-mesenchymal transitions during embryogenesis and caner progression. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1512–1520. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00550.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nawshad A. Lagamba D. Polad A. Hay E.D. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling during epithelialmesenchymal transformation: implications for embryogenesis and tumor metastasis. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;179:11–23. doi: 10.1159/000084505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nawshad A. Medici D. Liu C.C. Hay E.D. TGFbeta3 inhibits E-cadherin gene expression in palate medialedge epithelial cells through a Smad2-Smad4-LEF1 transcription complex. J. Cell Sci. 2007;120:1646–1653. doi: 10.1242/jcs.003129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nishihara A. Hanai J.I. Okamoto N. Yanagisawa J. Kato S. Miyazono K. Kawabata M. Role of p300 a transcriptional coactivator in signalling of TGF-beta. Genes. Cells. 1998;3:613–623. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Noel A. Boulay A. Kebers F. Kannan R. Hajitou A. Calberg-Bacq C.M. Basset P. Rio M.C. Foidart J.M. Demonstration in vivo that stromelysin-3 functions through its proteolytic activity. Oncogene. 2000;19:1605–1612. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Oft M. Heider K.H. Beug H. TGFbeta signaling is necessary for carcinoma cell invasiveness and metastasis. Curr. Biol. 1998;8:1243–1252.. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00533-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Peinado H. Olmeda D. Cano A. Snail Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:415–428. doi: 10.1038/nrc2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Perez-Moreno M. Jamora C. Fuchs E. Sticky business: orchestrating cellular signals at adherens junctions. Cell. 2003;112:535–548. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00108-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Piek E. Moustakas A. Kurisaki A. Heldin C.H. Ten Dijke P. TGF-â type I receptor/ALK-5 and Smad proteins mediate epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation in NMuMG breast epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112:4557–4568. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.24.4557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Platten M. Wick W. Weller M. Malignant glioma biology: role for TGF-beta in growth motility angiogenesis and immune escape. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2001;52:401–410. doi: 10.1002/1097-0029(20010215)52:4<401::AID-JEMT1025>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pon Y.L. Zhou H.Y. Cheung A.N. Ngan H.Y. Wong A.S. p70 S6 kinase promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition through snail induction in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:6524–6532. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Radisky E.S. Radisky D.C. Matrix metalloproteinase induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2010;15:201–212. doi: 10.1007/s10911-010-9177-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Radisky D.C. Levy D.D. Littlepage L.E. Liu H. Nelson C.M. Fata J.E. Leake D. Godden E.L. Albertson D.G. Nieto M.A. Werb Z. Bissell M.J. Rac1b and reactive oxygen species mediate MMP-3-induced EMT and genomic instability. Nature. 2005;436:123–127. doi: 10.1038/nature03688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Reiss M. Barcellos-Hoff M.H. Transforming growth factor-beta in breast cancer: a working hypothesis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 1997;45:81–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1005865812918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Roger L. Jullien L. Gire V. Roux P. Gain of oncogenic function of p53 mutants regulates E-cadherin expression uncoupled from cell invasion in colon cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123:1295–1305. doi: 10.1242/jcs.061002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Saika S. Kono-Saika S. Ohnishi Y. Sato M. Muragaki Y. Ooshima A. Flanders K.C. Yoo Y. Anzano M. Liu C.Y. Kao W.W. Roberts A.B. Smad3 signaling is required for epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lens epithelium after injury. Am. J. Pathol. 2004;164:651–663. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63153-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Santibañez J.F. JNK mediates TGF-beta1-induced epithelial mesenchymal transdifferentiation of mouse transformed keratinocytes. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:5385–5391. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sarbassove D.D. Ali S.M. Sabatini D.M. Growing roles for the mTOR pathway. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005;17:596–603. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sato M. Muragaki Y. Saika S. Roberts A.B. Ooshima A. Targeted disruption of TGF-â1/Smad3 signaling protects against renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;112:1486–1494. doi: 10.1172/JCI19270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Schilling S.H. Hjelemeland A.B. Rich J.N. Wang X.F. TGF-β Family (Eds. Derynck R. and Miyazono K.) . Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pres; New York: 2008. pp. 45–78. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Snoek-van Beurden P.A. Von den Hoff J.W. Zymographic techniques for the analysis of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Biotechniques. 2005;38:73–83. doi: 10.2144/05381RV01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Somiari S.B. Somiari R.I. Heckman C.M. Olsen C.H. Jordan R.M. Russell S.J. Shriver C.D. Circulating MMP2 and MMP9 in breast cancer -- potential role in classification of patients into low risk high risk benign disease and breast cancer categories. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119:1403–1411. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Song H. Ki S.H. Kim S.G. Moon A. Activating transcription factor 2 mediates matrix metalloproteinase-2 transcriptional activation induced by p38 in breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10487–10496. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Song W. Jackson K. McGuire P.G. Degradation of type IV collagen by matrix metalloproteinases is an important step in the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of the endocardial cushions. Dev. Biol. 2000;227:606–617. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sternlicht M.D. Werb Z. How matrix metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2001;17:463–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Taki M. Kamata N. Yokoyama K. Fujimoto R. Tsutsumi S. Nagayama M. Down-regulation of Wnt-4 and upregulation of Wnt-5a expression by epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:593–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01488.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Takkunen M. Grenman R. Hukkanen M. Korhonen M. García de Herreros A. Virtanen I. Snail-dependent and -independent epithelial-mesenchymal transition in oral squamous carcinoma cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2006;54:1263–1275. doi: 10.1369/jhc.6A6958.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tavares A.L. Mercado-Pimentel M.E. Runyan R.B. Kitten G.T. TGF-β-mediated RhoA expression is necessary for epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the embryonic chick heart. Dev. Dyn. 2006;235:1589–1598. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Thiery J.P. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:442–454. doi: 10.1038/nrc822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Thiery J.P. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. (2003;15:740–746. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Thiery J.P. Morgan M. Breast cancer progression with a Twist. Nat. Med. 2004;10:777–778. doi: 10.1038/nm0804-777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Timmerman L.A. Grego-Bessa J. Raya A. Bertrán E. Pérez-Pomares J.M. Díez J. Aranda S. Palomo S. McCormick F. Izpisúa-Belmonte J.C. de la Pompa J.L. Notch promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition during cardiac development and oncogenic transformation. Genes. Dev. 2004;18:99–115. doi: 10.1101/gad.276304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Trelstad R.L. Hay E.D. Revel J.D. Cell contact during early morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 1967;16:78–106. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Trimboli A.J. Fukino K. de Bruin A. Wei G. Shen L. Tanner S.M. Creasap N. Rosol T.J. Robinson M.L. Eng C. Ostrowski M.C. Leone G. Direct evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in breast cancer. 2008;68:937–945. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Uttamsingh S. Bao X. Nguyen K.T. Bhanot M. Gong J. Chan J.L. Liu F. Chu T.T. Wang L.H. Synergistic effect between EGF and TGF-beta1 in inducing oncogenic properties of intestinal epithelial cells. Oncogene. 2008;27:2626–2634. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Valcourt U. Kowanetz M. Niimi H. Heldin C.H. Moustakas A. TGF-beta and the Smad signaling pathway support transcriptomic reprogramming during epithelial-mesenchymal cell transition. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:1987–2002. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-08-0658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Voulgari A. Pintzas A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: mechanisms markers and strategies to overcome drug resistance in the clinic. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1796:75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Vuoriluoto K. Haugen H. Kiviluoto S. Mpindi J.P. Nevo J. Gjerdrum C. Tiron C. Lorens J.B. Ivaska J. Vimentin regulates EMT induction by Slug and oncogenic HRas and migration by governing Axl expression in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2010 doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.509. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang Z. Banerjee S. Li Y. Rahman K.M. Zhang Y. Sarkar F.H. Down-regulation of notch-1 inhibits invasion by inactivation of nuclear factor-kappaB vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2778–2784. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wick W. Platten M. Weller M. Glioma cell invasion: regulation of metalloproteinase activity by TGF-beta. J.Neurooncol. 2001;53:177–185. doi: 10.1023/A:1012209518843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Xie L. Law B.K. Chytil A.M. Brown K.A. Aakre M.E. Moses H.L. Activation of the Erk pathway is required for TGF-beta1-induced EMT in vitro. Neoplasia. 2004;6:603–610. doi: 10.1593/neo.04241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Xu J. Lamouille S. Derynck R. TGF-beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res. 2009;19:156–172. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yee D.S. Tang Y. Li X. Liu Z. Guo Y. Ghaffar S. McQueen P. Atreya D. Xie J. Simoneau A.R. Hoang B.H. Zi X. The Wnt inhibitory factor 1 restoration in prostate cancer cells was associated with reduced tumor growth decreased capacity of cell migration and invasion and a reversal of epithelial epithelialto mesenchymal transition. Mol. Cancer. 2010;9:162. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yi J.Y. Shin I. Arteaga C.L. Type I transforming growth factor beta receptor binds to and activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:10870–10876. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413223200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yook J.I. Li X.Y. Ota I. Fearon E.R. Weiss S.J. Wnt-dependent regulation of the E-cadherin repressor snail. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:11740–11748. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413878200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Yu L. Hébert M.C. Zhang Y.E. TGF-beta receptoractivated p38 MAP kinase mediates Smad-independent TGF-beta responses. EMBO J. 2002;21:3749–3759. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zavadil J. Bottinger E.P. TGF-beta and epithelialtomesenchymal transitions. Oncogene. 2005;24:5764–5774. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zavadil J. Cermak L. Soto-Nieves N. Böttinger E.P. Integration of TGF-beta/Smad and Jagged1/Notch signaling in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. EMBO J. 2004;23:1155–1165. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zavadil J. Narasimhan M. Blumenberg M. Schneider R.J. Transforming growth factor-beta and microRNA: mRNA regulatory networks in epithelial plasticity. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007;185:157–161. doi: 10.1159/000101316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhou B.P. Deng J. Xia W. Xu J. Li Y.M. Gunduz M. Hung M.C. Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3betamediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:931–940. doi: 10.1038/ncb1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]