Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2013 Nov 16;19:2312–2320.

Retinal pigment epithelium protein of 65 kDA gene-linked retinal degeneration is not modulated by chicken acidic leucine-rich epidermal growth factor-like domain containing brain protein/Neuroglycan C/ chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 5

Sandra Cottet 1,2, René Jüttner 3, Nathalie Voirol 1, Pierre Chambon 4, Fritz G Rathjen 3, Daniel F Schorderet 1,2,5, Pascal Escher 1,2,
PMCID: PMC3834887  PMID: 24265546

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze in vivo the function of chicken acidic leucine-rich epidermal growth factor-like domain containing brain protein/Neuroglycan C (gene symbol: Cspg5) during retinal degeneration in the Rpe65−/− mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis.

Methods

We resorted to mice with targeted deletions in the Cspg5 and retinal pigment epithelium protein of 65 kDa (Rpe65) genes (Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/−). Cone degeneration was assessed with cone-specific peanut agglutinin staining. Transcriptional expression of rhodopsin (Rho), S-opsin (Opn1sw), M-opsin (Opn1mw), rod transducin α subunit (Gnat1), and cone transducin α subunit (Gnat2) genes was assessed with quantitative PCR from 2 weeks to 12 months. The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) was analyzed at P14 with immunodetection of the retinol-binding protein membrane receptor Stra6.

Results

No differences in the progression of retinal degeneration were observed between the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice. No retinal phenotype was detected in the late postnatal and adult Cspg5−/− mice, when compared to the wild-type mice.

Conclusions

Despite the previously reported upregulation of Cspg5 during retinal degeneration in Rpe65−/− mice, no protective effect or any involvement of Cspg5 in disease progression was identified.

Introduction

Chicken acidic leucine-rich epidermal growth factor-like domain containing brain protein (CALEB)/ Neuroglycan C (NGC), hereafter called chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 5 (Cspg5) according to its gene symbol, is a transmembrane chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan [1] predominantly expressed at the surfaces of neurons and glial cells in the developing central nervous system [2]. In the mouse, three Cspg5 isoforms generated through alternative exon use and alternative splicing have been described thus far [35]. The major Cspg5-I isoform is composed of an N-terminal signal peptide of 30 amino acids (aa) and a 120 kDa core protein (514 aa) formed by five different structural domains: the N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) containing a chondroitin sulfate attachment site at serine 123 [6], a stretch of acidic amino acids, a single epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain embedded in a cysteine-rich domain, a transmembrane region, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain [3]. Neuronal depolarization of chick retinal cells facilitated the processing of full-length Cspg5 into a truncated transmembrane form and an ectodomain, thus exposing the EGF-like domain [7]. A recombinant ectodomain promoted neurite outgrowth from rat neocortical neurons [8], and the EGF-like domain alone mediated the dendritic tree and spine complexity in primary hippocampal neurons and, in vivo, in the electroporated embryonic mouse cortex [9]. Cspg5 was also recently shown to be necessary for the proper radial migration of neurons in the developing mouse cerebral cortex [10].

Mice with a targeted disruption of the Cspg5 gene (Cspg5−/− mice) were morphologically normal, viable, and fertile, but with decreased maternal behavior [7]. Electrophysiological analyses showed several distinct abnormalities at early postnatal stages (P1–P3), but not at P20–P22: higher paired-pulse ratios, less depression during prolonged repetitive activation, a lower rate of spontaneous synaptic currents, and a lower release probability at gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic synapses [7]. The retina appeared morphologically normal in the Cspg5−/− mice [7]. Retinal Cspg5 expression was reduced at the late postnatal and the adult stages (P14–P42), when synapse maturation was complete [11]. In the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), Cspg5 was differentially expressed during development [11]. At P7, Cspg5 was localized to the basal infoldings of the RPE cells, facing the choroid. In the adult, Cspg5 was expressed at the highest levels at the microvilli of the apical surface, facing the neural retina [5,11].

We previously reported increased Cspg5 mRNA and protein expression in the retina and the RPE of Rpe65−/− mice, an animal model of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), during disease progression [5,12]. Retinal pigment epithelium protein of 65 kDa (RPE65) is the iron(II)-dependent isomerohydrolase essential for generating the photopigment 11-cis retinal from all-trans-retinyl ester in the retinoid visual cycle [13,14]. The lack of 11-cis retinal in Rpe65−/− mice resulted in cone photoreceptor degeneration with cone opsin mislocalization to the inner segment within the first postnatal weeks and a concomitant decrease in cone-specific gene expression [12,15]. In contrast, rod photoreceptor degeneration progressed slowly, dependent on residual transduction cascade by unliganded opsin [16], and rhodopsin remained correctly localized in aged animals [1719]. To further investigate whether Cspg5 upregulation may exert a protective effect against retinal degeneration in the absence of RPE65, we analyzed cone and rod photoreceptor survival in wild-type, Cspg5−/−, Rpe65−/−, and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice, with the working hypothesis that enhanced progression of retinal degeneration in Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice might be observed.

Methods

Animal handling

All experiments performed in this study were in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by the Veterinary Service of the State of Valais (Switzerland). Mice were kept in a 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle with unlimited access to food and water. Rpe65−/− mice [17] and Cspg5−/− mice [7] had been backcrossed in a C57BL/6J genetic background. For genotyping Rpe65−/− mice, primers RPE65_WT_F (5′-TCA TGG TCT AGC CAT GTC TG-3′) and RPE65_Com_R (5′-AAT CCC TAC CAG ATG CCA TC-3′) were used to amplify a 155 bp fragment in intron 3 of the wild-type allele, downstream of the targeted exon 3. To detect the targeted allele, primers RPE65_KO_F (5′-CAC TTG TGT AGC GCC AAG TG-3′), located in the human phosphoglycerate kinase promoter (PGK), and RPE65_Com_R were used to amplify a fragment of about 200 bp. Cspg5−/− mice were genotyped as previously described [7]. We used C57BL/6J mice as the wild-type controls (RCC, Basel, Switzerland).

Ribonucleic acid preparation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RNA from mouse retinas and pure RPE cells was prepared and analyzed with quantitative PCR as previously described [5]. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Eyes were enucleated, immobilized with 0.2 mm Austerlitz insect pins (Fine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany) on a Sylgard 184-filled cell culture dish (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and covered with 1x PBS (phosphate-buffered saline: 154 mM NaCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 3 mM Na2HPO4 heptahydrate). The eyeball was sectioned below the ora serrata to remove cornea, lens, iris and other attached tissues. The retina was detached from the pigmented epithelium (RPE) and then homogenized with 18G Sterican needles (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) in TRI Reagent® (Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Pure RPE cells were obtained by digesting the posterior eyecup comprised of RPE, choriocapillaris, and sclera in 0.2% trypsin (Invitrogen, Basel, Switzerland) for 1 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. RPE cells were gently peeled off with forceps and transferred into TRI Reagent®. Total RNA was prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions, with prolonged centrifugation times to increase RNA recovery. Reverse transcription was performed on 500 ng of total RNA (1st strand cDNA synthesis kit for RT–PCR (AMV); Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Quantitative PCR was performed on an Mx3000p sequence analyzer using Fast Start Universal SYBR®Green Master Mix (Roche). Experimental data points with cycle threshold (Ct) values above 30 were not considered for data analysis. Expression of the ribosomal protein L8 (RL8) was used as internal standard. Primers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Primers for quantitative PCR.

Gene (mus) Forward primer (5′-3′) Reverse primer (5′-3′) GenBank accession number Location (nt)
Abca4
ATCGAGGAGTACTCAGTCAC
CCTGGTGTGCTTATCTTCTG
NM_007378
6775–7008
Gnat1
AGAGGATGCTGAGAAGGATG
ACTGAATGTTGAGCGTGGTC
NM_008140
104- 315
Gnat2
CATCAGTGCTGAGGACAAAG
GACTTGAACTCTAGGCACTC
NM_008141
93- 294
Impg1
AATCGAAAGCTACTCCCTCG
TTGTAGAGTGATCTGGTGGC
NM_022016
2084–2332
Impg2
CTTCTGCTGTCGTCTTCTTC
CCAATCACCTCTTCACTAGC
BC048863
3544–3769
Lrat
AGCCTACTGTGGAACAACTG
CAGACATCATCCACAAGCAG
NM_023624
724- 953
Cspg5
GACTGAGAATACCAAGCTGC
TTGGGTGACATGGAGTTCTG
NM_013884
1500–1700
Opn1mw
TGAGGATAGCACCCATGCAA
GGCGCAGCTTCTTGAATCTC
NM_008106
83- 282
Opn1sw
TGGTCAACAATCGGAACCAC
AGGGCCAACTTTGCTAGAAG
NM_007538
874–1100
Rbp1
AATCGCCAACTTGCTGAAGC
TCTGCACACACTGGAGTTTG
X60367
2113–2312
Rbp3
TACTTCTTTGACGAGGCACC
CTTGTCACTTCACCGATGAC
NM_015745
3361–3584
Rdh5
TACCTCCAGCTATACAGGCC
ATCCAGGTGAGCACAGCATC
NM_134006
867–1107
Rdh12
TCACTCGAGAACTGGCTAAG
TGACGTTCCACAATCGCTCA
NM_030017
756–1046
Rho
CTCCATGCTGGCAGCGTACA
TGCTCATCGGCTTGCAGACC
NM_145383
189- 511
RL8
ACTGGACAGTTCGTGTACTG
GCTTCACTCGAGTCTTCTTG
NM_012053
271- 469
Stra6 GCTACTCCGAGAAGTATCTG TTCTGCACAGTAGGCACCAC AF062476 1083–1323

The location of the PCR amplification products is indicated with respect to nucleotide numbering of the indicated GenBank accession numbers.

Immunohistochemistry

Eyes were enucleated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-1X PBS for 2 h at 4 °C. After cryoprotection by immersion in 30% sucrose-1x PBS overnight at 4 °C, eyes were embedded in freezing compound (30% albumin/3% gelatine in 1X PBS). For immunohistochemistry, 12-mm cryosections were collected on Superfrost®Plus glass slides (Menzel Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany). Sections were dried at room temperature for at least 1 h, quickly hydrated with 1X PBS and blocked for 1 h in 1X PBS containing 2% goat serum and 0.2% Triton X-100. A rabbit polyclonal serum raised against amino acids 565–670 of Stra6 was diluted at 1:200 in blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C [20]. Sections were then briefly rinsed twice with blocking solution and washed once for 5 min. A secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) was diluted at 1:1,000 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Sections were rinsed briefly twice in 1X PBS and then washed three times for 5 min. To visualize nuclei, sections were stained in 300 nM 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dichloride (DAPI; Sigma-Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) for 20 min at room temperature. Slides were washed three times for 5 min in 1X PBS, before mounting in Cityfluor AF3 (Cityfluor, London, England). To assess cone degeneration, slides were first stained with DAPI, and then cone photoreceptor outer segments were stained with 20 μg/ml fluorescein-conjugated peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA; Sigma-Fluka) for 75 min at room temperature and rinsed 3 times for 5 min in 1X PBS, before mounting in Cityfluor AF3.

Cone photoreceptor counting

FITC-PNA-stained sections were analyzed with an Olympus BX61 fluorescent microscope equipped with a digital DP71 camera (Olympus, Volketswil, Switzerland). For each genotype, 9–12 micrographs from three eyes were taken at a 200X magnification, and the labeled cones present in the field of view counted. Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop 7 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA) to overlay the FITC-PNA and DAPI staining.

Statistical analysis

The cone photoreceptor counting data presented in Figure 1 were analyzed with the Student t test, after testing for equal variances and normal distribution. Quantitative PCR data presented were analyzed with two-way ANOVA, using factors of genotype and age (Prism 4.0.2; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Progression of cone degeneration in retinal pigment epithelium protein of 65 kDa (Rpe65)−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas. Fluorescein-conjugated peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA)-labeled cones were counted on retinal sections of 2-, 4-, and 8-week-old mice. Cones had almost disappeared in the central retina of the 4- and 8-week-old Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice. The peripheral region considered for cone counting in the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice was located toward the edges of the retina. With two-way ANOVA using factors of genotype and age, no significant differences were found between the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice in the number of cones, in the central and peripheral retina (n=4). For all time points, the number of cones per field of view±standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown.

Results

No alteration in retina- and retinal pigment epithelium-specific gene expression in Cspg5−/− mice

To assess retinal gene expression in mutant mice, quantitative PCR analysis was performed in 2-month-old wild-type and Cspg5−/− mice. No altered mRNA expression of the phototransduction (Rho, Opn1mw, Opn1sw), the visual cycle (Rbp1, Rbp3, Abca4, Stra6, Lrat, Rdh5, Rdh12) and the interphotoreceptor matrix (IPM; Impg1, Impg2) genes was observed in the retina and the RPE of Cspg5−/− mice (Table 2).

Table 2. Gene expression in retina and RPE of Cspg5−/− mice.

Gene
  Retina 2 month
RPE 2 month
wild-type Cspg5−/− wild-type Cspg5−/−
Abca4
1.00±0.14
1.08±0.06
n.t.
n.t.
Impg1
1.00±0.05
1.09±0.06
1.00±0.05
1.00±0.05
Impg2
1.00±0.11
1.11±0.18
1.00±0.06
0.96±0.03
Lrat
1.00±0.04
1.02±0.09
1.00±0.09
1.13±0.14
Cspg5
1.00±0.09
n.d.
1.00±0.03
n.d.
Opn1mw
1.00±0.04
0.97±0.08
n.t.
n.t.
Opn1sw
1.00±0.18
0.92±0.06
n.t.
n.t.
Rbp1
1.00±0.04
1.03±0.07
1.00±0.15
1.11±0.04
Rbp3
1.00±0.12
1.07±0.05
1.00±0.10
0.99±0.04
Rdh5
n.t.
n.t.
1.00±0.16
1.15±0.07
Rdh12
1.00±0.07
1.15±0.17
1.00±0.04
0.97±0.03
Rho
1.00±0.07
1.08±0.04
n.t.
n.t.
Stra6 1.00±0.11 1.15±0.05 1.00±0.11 1.18±0.08

Quantitative PCR was performed with primers listed in Table 1. Normalized data from 4 different mice±standard deviation are shown. n.d.: not detected; n.t.: not tested

Cone degeneration progresses similarly in Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice

Cone degeneration in the central retina appeared to progress similarly in Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice, and the Cspg5−/− mouse was comparable to that of the wild-type (Figure 1). At 1 month, when the cones had almost disappeared in the central retina of the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice, some cones were still present in the periphery. When the mice were 2 months old, almost no cones were present in Rpe65−/− (Figure 2C) and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice (Figure 2D), while prominent staining of cone outer segments was observed in the central retina of the wild-type (Figure 2A) and Cspg5−/− mice (Figure 2B). In the periphery of the Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas, residual staining of cones was still observed, with mislocalized labeling in the inner segments and at the synaptic endfeet of cone photoreceptors (Figure 2E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cone degeneration in Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas. Central regions of retinas from 8-week-old wild-type (A), Cspg5−/− (B), Rpe65−/−, and (C) Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− (D) mice were analyzed. Cones were labeled with fluorescein-conjugated peanut agglutinin (green), nuclei were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (blue), and the images were merged. The cone outer segments were prominently stained in the wild-type and Cspg5−/− retinas (A, B). Residual staining of cone inner segments was observed in the central retina of the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice (C, D). In the peripheral regions of the Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas, cone outer segment labeling was still observed, with mislocalization to the synaptic endfeet of cone photoreceptors (star; E). Abbreviations: photoreceptor outer segments (os); photoreceptor inner segments (is); outer nuclear layer (onl); outer plexiform layer (opl); inner nuclear layer (inl); inner plexiform layer (ipl); ganglion cell layer (gcl). Scale bar equals 50 μm.

Cone-specific gene expression declines similarly in Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice

The expression of cone-specific Opn1mw, Opn1sw, and Gnat2 genes was assessed with quantitative PCR from 2 weeks to 6 months of age in wild-type, Cspg5−/−, Rpe65−/−, and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice (Figure 3). No significant changes in mRNA expression were observed between the wild-type and Cspg5−/− retinas. Transcript levels decreased similarly in the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas, to reach at 6 months about 30% and 25% of the wild-type levels for Opn1mw and Gnat2, respectively. The Opn1sw levels were at the limit of detection from 2 months on.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time-course of cone-specific gene expression. The expression of the cone-specific M-opsin (Opn1mw), S-opsin (Opn1sw), and cone transducin alpha subunit (Gnat2) genes was assessed with quantitative PCR. Total RNA was extracted from the retinas of the wild-type, Rpe65−/−, Cspg5−/−, and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice at ages 2 weeks (w) to 6 months (m). For each time point and genotype, three animals were analyzed in duplicate. Wild-type retinal mRNA expression was arbitrarily set to 1 at 2 weeks. For all panels, fold inductions±standard error of the mean (SEM) are shown. With two-way ANOVA, using factors of time and genotypes, no significant changes in relative mRNA expression between the wild-type and Cspg5−/− mice, and between Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice were detected.

Rod-specific gene expression during retinal degeneration

The expression of rod-specific Rho and Gnat1 genes was assessed with quantitative PCR from 2 weeks to 12 months of age in the wild-type, Cspg5−/−, Rpe65−/−, and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice (Figure 4). The Rho and Gnat1 levels slowly decreased between 2 and 12 months by about 30% in the Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas, compared to the wild-type and Cspg5−/− retinas. However, no difference in Rho and Gnat1 expression was observed in the Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas compared to the Rpe65−/− retinas.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Time-course of rod-specific gene expression. Total RNA was extracted from the retinas of the wild-type, Rpe65−/−, Cspg5−/−, and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice at ages 2 weeks (w) to 12 months (m). Rhodopsin (Rho) and rod transducin alpha subunit (Gnat1) gene expression was assessed with quantitative PCR, with four animals analyzed in duplicate for each genotype. Wild-type mRNA expression was arbitrarily set to 1 at 2 weeks. For all panels, fold inductions±standard error of the mean (SEM) are shown. With two-way ANOVA, no significant changes in relative mRNA expression between wild-type and Cspg5−/− mice, and between Rpe65−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice were detected during progression of the disease.

Preservation of the retinal pigment epithelium in Cspg5−/− and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− retinas

During early postnatal development, Cspg5 protein is predominantly expressed on the basal side of the RPE [11]. The retinol-binding protein membrane receptor Stra6, mediating the cellular uptake of vitamin A in the RPE, is also located at the basolateral membrane of the RPE [21]. To further investigate the integrity of the RPE in the absence of Cspg5, immunohistochemical analysis was performed to detect Stra6 protein in P14 wild-type, Cspg5−/−, Rpe65−/−, and Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice (Figure 5). Stra6 was predominantly localized at the basolateral membrane of the RPE in all mouse genotypes, suggesting that the absence of Cspg5 expression did not alter the integrity of the RPE.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Stra6 protein expression in the P14 mouse retina. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with a rabbit polyclonal serum raised against the C-terminus of Stra6 (red), on retinal sections of wild-type (A), Rpe65−/− (B), Cspg5−/−, and (C) Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− (D) mice. Stra6 was predominantly expressed at the basolateral membrane of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in all analyzed genotypes. The nuclei were stained in blue with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI), and the images were merged. As a negative control, a serum of a non-immunized rabbit was used, the nuclei stained with DAPI, and the images merged (E). Abbreviations: retinal pigment epithelium (rpe); photoreceptor outer segments (os); photoreceptor inner segments (is); outer nuclear layer (onl). Scale bar equals 40 μm.

Discussion

The loss of photoreceptors in the outer retina is accompanied by morphological and biochemical alterations including a decrease in the IPM, modification of the extracellular matrix as well as impaired intercellular interactions susceptible to influence retinal pathogenesis [22,23]. Several reports have described altered levels of proteoglycans in the IPM and the apical surface of the RPE in rodent models of retinal degeneration including light-induced, rd1, and Rho−/− mice and Royal College of Surgeon (RCS) rats [2427]. In addition, disruption of IPM proteoglycans following intravitreal injection of xyloside, an inhibitor of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, has been shown to trigger cone outer segment degeneration and retinal detachment [28]. Patients with mutations in the retinal interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan IMPG2 developed an early-onset form of retinitis pigmentosa [29]. Finally, treatment of RPE cells with chondroitin sulfate resulted in reduced cell density and increased phagocytic activities, suggesting that induced biosynthesis of glycosaminoglycan may affect the metabolic and functional properties of the RPE [30]. Taken together, these observations argue in favor of the role of proteoglycans in maintaining photoreceptor cells.

In the present study, we observed no difference in the progression of cone degeneration in the absence of Cspg5. The early loss of cones in the Cspg5−/−/Rpe65−/− mice was comparable to Rpe65−/− mice. Additionally, the observed decrease in rod-specific gene expression during progression of the disease in Rpe65−/− mice was not exacerbated in the Rpe65−/− mice lacking Cspg5. Altogether, these results indicate that the increased Cspg5 protein observed in the retina of the Rpe65−/− mice is not directly involved in the pathogenesis and the progression of retinal degeneration. The results further indicate that Cspg5 does not provide any protective effect on cone and rod photoreceptors survival in Rpe65−/− mice. However, our analyses cannot exclude subtle changes, namely, in the retinal architecture and in the development of the retinal synaptic network. Cspg5, originally found in the developing brain, is likely involved in neuritogenesis and synaptogenesis in the central nervous system. Several studies previously reported a role of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in regulating neurite outgrowth from retinal cells [31]. High expression of Cspg5 has been described in the nerve fiber and inner plexiform layer during formation of the retinal synapses [7,11]. Moreover, spatiotemporal regulation of Cspg5 has been reported in the developing retina, with decreased expression of the proteoglycan in correlation with maturation of the synapses [11]. In retinal ganglion cells, Cspg5 extensively localized in the spiny budding neurites [11]. These observations argue in favor of a role of Cspg5 in the maturation of the neuronal network during retinogenesis. It therefore suggests that induced expression of Cspg5 in Rpe65-deficient retina may reflect a function of the proteoglycan in remodeling the retinal network. More specifically, the high level of the Cspg5 protein in neurite-containing retinal layers may reflect synapse remodeling in response to retinal degeneration in an attempt to maintain proper synaptic transmission in the degenerating Rpe65−/− retina.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. T. M. Redmond for the Rpe65−/− mice. This work was supported by a grant from Téléthon Action Suisse to PE.

References

  • 1.Watanabe E, Maeda N, Matsui F, Kushima Y, Noda M, Oohira A. Neuroglycan C, a novel membrane-spanning chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan that is restricted to the brain. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26876–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.26876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schumacher S, Volkmer H, Buck F, Otto A, Tarnók A, Roth S, Rathjen FG. Chicken acidic leucine-rich EGF-like domain containing brain protein (CALEB), a neural member of the EGF family of differentiation factors, is implicated in neurite formation. J Cell Biol. 1997;136:895–906. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.4.895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aono S, Keino H, Ono T, Yasuda Y, Tokita Y, Matsui F, Taniguchi M, Sonta S, Oohira A. Genomic organization and expression pattern of mouse neuroglycan C in the cerebellar development. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:337–42. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.1.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aono S, Tokita Y, Yasuda Y, Hirano K, Yamauchi S, Shuo T, Matsui F, Keino H, Kashiwai A, Kawamura N, Shimada A, Kishikawa M, Asai M, Oohira A. Expression and identification of a new splice variant of neuroglycan C, a transmembrane chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in the human brain. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83:110–8. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Escher P, Cottet S, Aono S, Oohira A, Schorderet DF. Differential neuroglycan C expression during retinal degeneration in Rpe65−/− mice. Mol Vis. 2008;14:2126–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aono S, Tokita Y, Shuo T, Yamauchi S, Matsui F, Nakanishi K, Hirano K, Sano M, Oohira A. Glycosylation site for chondroitin sulfate on the neural part-time proteoglycan, neuroglycan C. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:46536–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403263200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jüttner R, More MI, Das D, Babich A, Meier J, Henning M, Erdmann B, Müller EC, Otto A, Grantyn R, Rathjen FG. Impaired synapse function during postnatal development in the absence of CALEB, an EGF-like protein processed by neuronal activity. Neuron. 2005;46:233–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nakanishi K, Aono S, Hirano K, Kuroda Y, Ida M, Tokita Y, Matsui F, Oohira A. Identification of neurite outgrowth-promoting domains of neuroglycan C, a brain-specific chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, and involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein kinase C signaling pathways in neuritogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:24970–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601498200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brandt N, Franke K, Rasin MR, Baumgart J, Vogt J, Khrulev S, Hassel B, Pohl EE, Sestan N, Nitsch R, Schumacher S. The neural EGF family member CALEB/NGC mediates dendritic tree and spine complexity. EMBO J. 2007;26:2371–86. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang C, Mejia LA, Huang J, Valnegri P, Bennett EJ, Anckar J, Jahani-Asl A, Gallardo G, Ikeuchi Y, Yamada T, Rudnicki M, Harper JW, Bonni A. The X–Linked Intellectual Disability Protein PHF6 Associates with the PAF1 Complex and Regulates Neuronal Migration in the Mammalian Brain. Neuron. 2013;78:986–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Inatani M, Tanihara H, Oohira A, Otori Y, Nishida A, Honjo M, Kido N, Honda Y. Neuroglycan C, a neural tissue-specific transmembrane chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in retinal neural network formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4338–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cottet S, Michaut L, Boisset G, Schlecht U, Gehring W, Schorderet DF. Biological characterization of gene response in Rpe65−/− mouse model of Leber's congenital amaurosis during progression of the disease. FASEB J. 2006;20:2036–49. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6211com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jin M, Li S, Moghrabi WN, Sun H, Travis GH. Rpe65 is the retinoid isomerase in bovine retinal pigment epithelium. Cell. 2005;122:449–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moiseyev G, Takahashi Y, Chen Y, Gentleman S, Redmond TM, Crouch RK, Ma JX. RPE65 is an iron(II)-dependent isomerohydrolase in the retinoid visual cycle. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:2835–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508903200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Znoiko SL, Rohrer B, Lu K, Lohr HR, Crouch RK, Ma JX. Downregulation of cone-specific gene expression and degeneration of cone photoreceptors in the Rpe65−/− mouse at early ages. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1473–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Woodruff ML, Wang Z, Chung HY, Redmond TM, Fain GL, Lem J. Spontaneous activity of opsin apoprotein is a cause of Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 2003;35:158–64. doi: 10.1038/ng1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Redmond TM, Yu S, Lee E, Bok D, Hamasaki D, Chen N, Goletz P, Ma J-X, Crouch K, Pfeifer K. Rpe65 is necessary for production of 11-cis-vitamin A in the retinal visual cycle. Nat Genet. 1998;20:344–51. doi: 10.1038/3813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seeliger MW, Grimm C, Ståhlberg F, Friedburg C, Jaissle G, Zrenner E, Guo H, Remé CE, Humphries P, Hofmann F, Biel M, Fariss RN, Redmond TM, Wenzel A. New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 2001;29:70–4. doi: 10.1038/ng712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rohrer B, Goletz P, Znoiko S, Ablonczy Z, Ma JX, Redmond TM, Crouch RK. Correlation of regenerable opsin with rod ERG signal in Rpe65−/− mice during development and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:310–5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bouillet P, Sapin V, Chazaud C, Messaddeq N, Décimo D, Dollé P, Chambon P. Developmental expression pattern of Stra6, a retinoic acid-responsive gene encoding a new type of membrane protein. Mech Dev. 1997;63:173–86. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kawaguchi R, Yu J, Honda J, Hu J, Whitelegge J, Ping P, Wiita P, Bok D, Sun H. A membrane receptor for retinol binding protein mediates cellular uptake of vitamin A. Science. 2007;315:820–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1136244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blanks JC, Johnson LV, Hageman GS. Stage-specific binding of peanut agglutinin to aggregates of degenerating photoreceptor cells in the rd mouse retina. Exp Eye Res. 1993;57:265–73. doi: 10.1006/exer.1993.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mieziewska K, van Veen T, Aguirre GD. Structural changes of the interphotoreceptor matrix in an inherited retinal degeneration: a lectin cytochemical study of progressive rod-cone degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3056–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Landers RA, Rayborn ME, Myers KM, Hollyfield JG. Increased retinal synthesis of heparan sulfate proteoglycan and HNK-1 glycoproteins following photoreceptor degeneration. J Neurochem. 1994;63:737–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.63020737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kennan A, Aherne A, Palfi A, Humphries M, McKee A, Stitt A, Simpson DAC, Demtroder K, Orntoft T, Ayuso C, Kenna PF, Farrar GJ, Humphries P. Identification of an IMPDH1 mutation in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP10) revealed following comparative microarray analysis of transcripts derived from retinas of wild-type and Rho−/− mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:547–57. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.5.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hackam AS, Strom R, Liu D, Qian J, Wang C, Otteson D, Gunatilaka T, Farkas RH, Chowers I, Kageyama M, Leveillard T, Sahel JA, Campochiaro PA, Parmigiani G, Zack DJ. Identification of gene expression changes associated with the progression of retinal degeneration in the rd1 mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2929–42. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahuja S, Ahuja P, Caffé AR, Ekstrom P, Abrahamson M, van Veen T. rd1 mouse retina shows imbalance in cellular distribution and levels of TIMP-1/MMP-9, TIMP-2/MMP-2 and sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Ophthalmic Res. 2006;38:125–36. doi: 10.1159/000090533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lazarus HS, Hageman GS. Xyloside-induced disruption of interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycans results in retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:364–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bandah-Rozenfeld D, Collin RW, Banin E, van den Born LI, Coene KL, Siemiatkowska AM, Zelinger L, Khan MI, Lefeber DJ, Erdinest I, Testa F, Simonelli F, Voesenek K, Blokland EA, Strom TM, Klaver CC, Qamar R, Banfi S, Cremers FP, Sharon D, den Hollander AI. Mutations in IMPG2, encoding interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2, cause autosomal-recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87:199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yue BY, Kawa JE, Chang IL, Sawaguchi S, Fishman GA. Effects of chondroitin sulfate on cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1991;15:365–76. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(91)90125-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Inatani M, Tanihara H. Proteoglycans in retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:429–47. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES