Abstract
We describe the first case of bacteremia due to Actinomyces urogenitalis. Bacteremia was secondary to a tubo-ovarian abscess following transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Identification was established by matrix-assisted desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. A. urogenitalis should be considered as a potential causative agent of infection after gynecological procedures.
CASE REPORT
We report a case of a 40-year-old, nulliparous woman presenting to the emergency department with high fever (40.7°C), shivering, and vomiting. These symptoms began immediately after coitus. Anamnesis revealed a 2-week history of intermittent fever, low abdominal pain, headache, and anorexia following a transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR) and embryo transfer in the context of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Moreover, the patient suffers from Crohn's disease, which had resulted in a right hemicolectomy in the past. She had not received any treatment for Crohn's disease in the last 2 years. She had no history of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) use. Clinical examination showed blood pressure of 110/60 mm Hg, a heart rate of 74 beats per min, and saturation of 98%. Auscultation of the lungs, heart, and abdomen gave normal results. The abdomen was soft, nontender, and nondistended. There was no cervical discharge. Laboratory analysis demonstrated a normal white blood cell (WBC) count (4 × 109/liter) and moderately elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (26.8 mg/liter). The serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) level was undetectable (<0.1 U/liter). No WBCs were detected in the urine. Both abdominal and vaginal ultrasounds were performed, with no abnormalities visualized except for a swollen right adnexa uteri. The patient was at that point discharged from the hospital with the presumptive diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). In attendance of results of cultures of vagina, urine, and blood, empirical antibiotic therapy was started: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (two doses, 2 g each) and doxycycline (two doses, 100 mg each). Furthermore, a vaginal specimen for Chlamydia trachomatis detection and bacterial culture was taken. Only 2 days later, the patient presented again to the emergency department with persistent lower abdominal pain. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed a large right adnexal multilocular collection. The WBC count was increased to 19.6 × 109/liter, and CRP was increased to 261.7 mg/liter. By then, the original blood cultures had become positive, showing straight to slightly curved Gram-positive rods with rudimentary branching. The original urine culture was negative, and the vaginal culture showed a normal presence of Lactobacillus spp. in the absence of WBCs. Neither C. trachomatis nor Neisseria gonorrhoeae was detected. A diagnosis of PID with abscess formation and bacteremia was made. Antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, four doses, 1 g each) were given intravenously, and laparoscopic exploration was performed. Because of many adhesions due to a previous hemicolectomy for Crohn's disease, switching to a laparotomy was mandatory. The right adnexal abscess was drained, and a microbiological culture was taken. Gram staining of the drained fluid showed Gram-positive rods, similar to those in the blood culture, in the presence of abundant polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Both blood culture and drained fluid culture revealed anaerobic growth of smooth colonies which were catalase-negative, nonsporulating, nonmotile, nonhemolytic, and aerotolerant Gram-positive rods. Both isolates were identified as Actinomyces urogenitalis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (score > 2.0) using a Bruker Biotyper (Bruker Daltronics, Inc., Leipzig, Germany). The phenotypic characteristics, as determined using API 20 strep (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), resulting in profile 5356450, were similar to those described by Nikolaitchouk (1). Identification was further confirmed by partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, according to interpretative criteria as defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2). Our strain exhibited 99.8% similarity (508 bp) with the type strain CCUG 38702 (AJ243791) of A. urogenitalis, using the GenBank database and the BLAST algorithm for sequence alignment. Furthermore, our strain differed from other species in 16S rRNA gene sequence by more than 1%. The most closely related species was an Actinomyces bovis strain with 97% identity. Susceptibility testing was performed using Etest strips (bioMérieux) according to the method of Smith et al. (3). MICs were interpreted following the guidelines of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), indicating susceptibility to ampicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, meropenem, clindamycin, linezolid, and vancomycin. MICs of penicillin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and metronidazole showed resistance (Table 1). Postoperatively, the patient recovered well. Inflammatory parameters decreased to normal values. Eight days after surgery, the patient was discharged from the hospital. However, antibiotic therapy was continued for 5 more days per os.
Table 1.
Antimicrobial agent | MIC (mg/liter) | Interpretationa |
---|---|---|
Penicillin | 1 | R |
Ampicillin | 0.5 | S |
Ceftriaxone | 0.25 | S |
Piperacillin-tazobactam | 0.5 | S |
Meropenem | 0.008 | S |
Ciprofloxacin | >32 | R |
Moxifloxacin | 1.5 | R |
Metronidazole | >256 | R |
Erythromycin | 0.5 | |
Clindamycin | 2 | S |
Cotrimoxazole | 0.5 | |
Tetracycline | 0.125 | |
Linezolid | 0.25 | S |
Vancomycin | 0.25 | S |
Interpretation following EUCAST clinical breakpoints, v. 3.0. R, resistant; S, susceptible.
Actinomyces spp. are classically defined as a heterogenous group of anaerobic, nonsporulating, non-acid-fast, Gram-positive rods which are associated with actinomycosis, a rare, chronic granulomatous disease. Since the introduction of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, several new Actinomyces spp. have been described. Little is known of their natural habitat or clinical significance, however. Actinomyces urogenitalis was described as a novel species in 2000 based upon the characterization of three isolates recovered from the human urogenital tract (1). Since then, it has become clear that A. urogenitalis is part of the normal flora of the human vagina. Colonization with high concentrations of A. urogenitalis can occur in cases of bacterial vaginosis, but its role in the pathogenesis is unclear (4). Only one case of A. urogenitalis infection has been described so far (5). The bacterium was isolated from the IUCD of a patient suffering from fever and cervical discharge. Pelvic actinomycosis is a well-established complication of IUCD use, and several Actinomyces spp. have been implicated in this disease (6). We report the first case of A. urogenitalis bacteremia secondary to tubo-ovarian abscess. In contrast to findings in previous publications, the infection was not associated with IUCD use but was a complication of ultrasound-guided, transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR). The importance of Actinomyces spp. in gynecological surgical-site infections is further supported by two other recent reports of pelvic abscesses, one after TVOR (Actinomyces israelii) and another after total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingectomy (Actinomyces hongkongensis) (7, 8).
Accurate identification of Actinomyces spp. has always been difficult. The many taxonomic changes have made identification by phenotypic tests almost impossible (9, 10, 11). Molecular techniques using 16S rRNA gene sequencing are an effective means for the identification of Actinomyces spp. (12, 13, 14). Partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing of our isolate demonstrated more than 99% identity with the A. urogenitalis type strain CCUG 38702 (GenBank accession no. AJ243791). Recently, the introduction of MALDI-TOF MS has revolutionized microbial identification in clinical microbiology. Several recent publications demonstrate the ability of MALDI-TOF MS to correctly and rapidly identify Actinomyces spp. (15, 16, 17, 18). MALDI-TOF MS may be considered an alternative method for routine identification, provided the database is up to date. The Bruker MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltronics) correctly identified our isolate, while Vitek MS (bioMérieux) could not identify the strain, since A. urogenitalis is not present in the database.
Data regarding the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. urogenitalis are very scarce. The susceptibility profiles of only two A. urogenitalis strains have been described previously (5, 19). These strains demonstrated susceptibilities to penicillin, ampicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, and clindamycin but resistance to metronidazole and fluoroquinolones. Our strain showed a similar profile, with the exception of penicillin. There are currently no CLSI or EUCAST standards for testing and reporting of antibiotic susceptibility results for Actinomyces spp. In most publications, data were generated by Etest methodology. In general, Actinomyces spp. showed susceptibility to a wide range of beta-lactam antibiotics and resistance to fluoroquinolones and metronidazole. Species differences in antimicrobial susceptibility have been described, however, necessitating the need for reliable identification (3, 19, 20).
TVOR is a procedure known to be possibly complicated by infection and pelvic abscess formation. However, the incidence is generally low and varies between 0.03% and 1.3% (7, 21–27). Transvaginal inoculation of bacteria into the peritoneal cavity or ovary by the collecting needle is the most apparent source of these infections (23, 28, 29). Furthermore, reactivation of a latent PID or direct colonic injury is also a possible, but less likely, mechanism of a post-TVOR pelvic infection (28, 30). It is plausible that in our case the organism was inoculated from the vagina into the ovary by the transvaginal procedure. The presence of pelvic adhesions, which were abundant in our case, is a known risk factor for post-TVOR infection (26). It is uncertain to what extent this has contributed to the development of an abscess in our case. As the clinical history of lower abdominal pain and intermittent fever shows, the abscess formation most likely started immediately after the TVOR, while the bacteremia with symptoms of sepsis was most likely mechanically induced by coitus.
The possibility of preventing such infections using preoperative vaginal disinfection or prophylactic antibiotics has been investigated (31). Our patient received neither of the two. Preoperative disinfection of the vagina with topical antiseptics, such as povidone iodine, has been questioned because of potential embryotoxic effects of disinfectants, resulting in a lower pregnancy rate (29, 32, 33). However, this has recently been contradicted (34). The efficacy of the procedure in preventing infection has been evaluated, resulting in opposite conclusions and recommendations (24, 34). The use of prophylactic antibiotics for TVOR is widespread, although the antibiotic used differs greatly: cefoxitin, ceftazidime, cefazolin, and the combination of cefazolin and metronidazole have been proposed (21, 22, 26, 28). The usefulness remains controversial, however, because of the low incidence of post-TVOR pelvic infection whether antibiotics are used or not (23, 26, 35). There is currently no standard of care in terms of antibiotic prophylaxis before TVOR, resulting in a great diversity of approaches between institutes (36).
This is the first case of A. urogenitalis bacteremia. Bacteremia was secondary to tubo-ovarian abscess, complicating TVOR. This report confirms the pathogenic potential of this bacterium to cause human disease. While IUCD use is an established risk factor for pelvic actinomycosis, recent publications, including ours, suggest a broader role of Actinomyces spp. in gynecological surgical-site infections. Future publications are needed to further elucidate the clinical significance of these bacteria.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 11 September 2013
REFERENCES
- 1.Nikolaitchouk N, Hoyles L, Falsen E, Grainger JM, Collins MD. 2000. Characterization of Actinomyces isolates from samples from the human urogenital tract: description of Actinomyces urogenitalis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1649–1654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Petti CA, Bosshard PP, Brandt ME, Clarridge JE, III, Feldblyum TV, Foxall P, Furtado MR, Pace N, Procop G. 2008. Interpretive criteria for identification of bacteria and fungi by DNA target sequencing; approved guideline. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith AJ, Hall V, Thakker B, Gemmell CG. 2005. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Actinomyces species with 12 antimicrobial agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:407–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nikolaitchouk N, Andersch B, Falsen E, Strömbeck L, Mattsby-Baltzer I. 2008. The lower genital tract microbiota in relation to cytokine-, SLPI- and endotoxin levels: application of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization (CDH). APMIS 116:263–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elsayed S, George A, Zhang K. 2006. Intrauterine contraceptive device-associated pelvic actinomycosis caused by Actinomyces urogenitalis. Anaerobe 12:67–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Westhoff C. 2007. IUDs and colonization or infection with Actinomyces. Contraception 75:S48–S50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Asemota OA, Girda E, Duenas O, Neal-Perry G, Pollack SE. 2013. Actinomycosis pelvic abscess after in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Flynn A, Lyndon C, Church D. 2013. Identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of an Actinomyces hongkongensis isolate recovered from a patient with pelvic actinomycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:2721–2723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hall V. 2008. Actinomyces—gathering evidence of human colonization and infection. Anaerobe 14:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Santala AM, Sarkonen N, Hall V, Carlson P, Jousimies-Somer H, Könönen E. 2004. Evaluation of four commercial test systems for identification of actinomyces and some closely related species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:418–420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wong V, Turmezei T, Weston V. 2011. Actinomycosis. BMJ 343:d6099. 10.1136/bmj.d6099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hall V, Talbot PR, Stubbs SL, Duerden BI. 2001. Identification of clinical isolates of actinomyces species by amplified 16S ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3555–3562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bosshard PP, Abels S, Zbinden R, Böttger EC, Altwegg M. 2003. Ribosomal DNA sequencing for identification of aerobic gram-positive rods in the clinical laboratory (an 18-month evaluation). J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4134–4140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Woo PC, Teng JL, Yeung JM, Tse H, Lau SK, Yuen KY. 2011. Automated identification of medically important bacteria by 16S rRNA gene sequencing using a novel comprehensive database, 16SpathDB. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:1799–1809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ng LS, Sim JH, Eng Menon LCS, Tan TY. 2012. Comparison of phenotypic methods and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the identification of aero-tolerant Actinomyces spp. isolated from soft-tissue infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:1749–1752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Farfour E, Leto J, Barritault M, Barberis C, Meyer J, Dauphin B, Le Guern AS, Leflèche A, Badell E, Guiso N, Leclercq A, Le Monnier A, Lecuit M, Rodriguez-Nava V, Bergeron E, Raymond J, Vimont S, Bille E, Carbonnelle E, Guet-Revillet H, Lécuyer H, Beretti JL, Vay C, Berche P, Ferroni A, Nassif X, Join-Lambert O. 2012. Evaluation of the Andromas matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for identification of aerobically growing Gram-positive bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:2702–2707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schmitt BH, Cunningham SA, Dailey AL, Gustafson DR, Patel R. 2013. Identification of anaerobic bacteria by Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry with on-plate formic acid preparation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:782–786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Seng P, Abat C, Rolain JM, Colson P, Lagier JC, Gouriet F, Fournier PE, Drancourt M, La Scola B, Raoult D. 2013. Identification of rare pathogenic bacteria in a clinical microbiology laboratory: impact of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:2182–2194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hansen JM, Fjeldsøe-Nielsen H, Sulim S, Kemp M, Christensen JJ. 2009. Actinomyces species: a Danish survey on human infections and microbiological characteristics. Open Microbiol. J. 3:113–120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tanaka-Bandoh K, Watanabe K, Kato N, Ueno K. 1997. Susceptibilities of Actinomyces species and Propionibacterium propionicus to antimicrobial agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:S262–S263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aragona C, Mohamed MA, Espinola MS, Linari A, Pecorini F, Micara G, Sbracia M. 2011. Clinical complications after transvaginal oocyte retrieval in 7,098 IVF cycles. Fertil. Steril. 95:293–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Siristatidis C, Chrelias C, Alexiou A, Kassanos D. 2013. Clinical complications after transvaginal oocyte retrieval: a retrospective analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 33:64–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bennett SJ, Waterstone JJ, Cheng WC, Parsons J. 1993. Complications of transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspiration: a review of 2670 consecutive procedures. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 10:72–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dicker D, Ashkenazi J, Feldberg D, Levy T, Dekel A, Ben-Rafael Z. 1993. Severe abdominal complications after transvaginal ultrasonographically guided retrieval of oocytes for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 59:1313–1315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roest J, Mous HV, Zeilmaker GH, Verhoeff A. 1996. The incidence of major clinical complications in a Dutch transport IVF programme. Hum. Reprod. Update 2:345–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tureck RW, García CR, Blasco L, Mastroianni L., Jr 1993. Perioperative complications arising after transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Obstet. Gynecol. 81:590–593 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bergh T, Lundkvist O. 1992. Clinical complications during in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum. Reprod. 7:625–626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sharpe K, Karovitch AJ, Claman P, Suh KN. 2006. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization complicated by ovarian abscess during pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 86:219.e11–219.e13. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Steyaert SR, Leroux-Roels GG, Dhont M. 2000. Infections in IVF: review and guidelines. Hum. Reprod. Update 6:432–441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.El-Shawarby S, Margara R, Trew G, Lavery S. 2004. A review of complications following transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Fertil. (Camb.) 7:127–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kelada E, Ghani R. 2007. Bilateral ovarian abscesses following transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVF: a case report and review of literature. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 24:143–145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gembruch U, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, Welker B, Wahode J, van der Ven H, Krebs D. 1988. Transvaginal, ultrasound-controlled follicle puncture. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 48:617–624 (In German.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.van Os HC, Roozenburg BJ, Janssen-Caspers HA, Leerentveld RA, Scholtes MC, Zeilmaker GH, Alberda AT. 1992. Vaginal disinfection with povidon iodine and the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 7:349–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tsai YC, Lin M, Chen SH, Chung MT, Loo TC, Huang KF, Lin LY. 2005. Vaginal disinfection with povidone iodine immediately before oocyte retrieval is effective in preventing pelvic abscess formation without compromising the outcome of IVF-ET. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 22:173–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Younis JS, Ezra Y, Laufer N, Ohel G. 1997. Late manifestation of pelvic abscess following oocyte retrieval, for in vitro fertilization, in patients with severe endometriosis and ovarian endometriomata. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 14:343–346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Weinreb E, Cholst I, Ledger W, Danis R, Rosenwaks Z. 2010. Should all oocyte donors receive prophylactic antibiotics for retrieval? Fertil. Steril. 94:2935–2937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]