Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2013 Dec;87(23):12900–12915. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02060-13

Genome Scale Evolution of Myxoma Virus Reveals Host-Pathogen Adaptation and Rapid Geographic Spread

Peter J Kerr a, Matthew B Rogers b,c, Adam Fitch b, Jay V DePasse b,*, Isabella M Cattadori d, Alan C Twaddle b, Peter J Hudson d, David C Tscharke e, Andrew F Read d, Edward C Holmes f,g, Elodie Ghedin b,c,
PMCID: PMC3838154  PMID: 24067966

Abstract

The evolutionary interplay between myxoma virus (MYXV) and the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following release of the virus in Australia in 1950 as a biological control is a classic example of host-pathogen coevolution. We present a detailed genomic and phylogeographic analysis of 30 strains of MYXV, including the Australian progenitor strain Standard Laboratory Strain (SLS), 24 Australian viruses isolated from 1951 to 1999, and three isolates from the early radiation in Britain from 1954 and 1955. We show that in Australia MYXV has spread rapidly on a spatial scale, with multiple lineages cocirculating within individual localities, and that both highly virulent and attenuated viruses were still present in the field through the 1990s. In addition, the detection of closely related virus lineages at sites 1,000 km apart suggests that MYXV moves freely in geographic space, with mosquitoes, fleas, and rabbit migration all providing means of transport. Strikingly, despite multiple introductions, all modern viruses appear to be ultimately derived from the original introductions of SLS. The rapidity of MYXV evolution was also apparent at the genomic scale, with gene duplications documented in a number of viruses. Duplication of potential virulence genes may be important in increasing the expression of virulence proteins and provides the basis for the evolution of novel functions. Mutations leading to loss of open reading frames were surprisingly frequent and in some cases may explain attenuation, but no common mutations that correlated with virulence or attenuation were identified.

INTRODUCTION

The experimental introduction of myxoma virus (MYXV) into the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) population of Australia and its unprecedented and unanticipated spread initiated one of the great natural experiments in evolution (1). The subsequent emergence of slightly attenuated viruses that were more efficiently transmitted and the natural selection of rabbits with genetic resistance to MYXV were carefully documented in real time (2). Sixty years later these studies continue to inform theory and practice in host-parasite coevolution and particularly the complex relationship between virulence and transmissibility.

MYXV is a poxvirus and the type species of the Leporipoxvirus genus. MYXV is native to South America, where its natural host is the tapeti (forest rabbit; Sylvilagus brasiliensis), in which the virus causes a largely innocuous, localized, cutaneous fibroma. MYXV is transmitted by mosquitoes or other biting arthropods probing through the fibroma and picking up virus on their mouthparts. Transmission is passive, as MYXV does not replicate in the vector. In European rabbits, which are not native to the Americas, MYXV causes the generalized lethal disease myxomatosis. As such, this represents a classic example of a pathogen that is highly virulent in a new host species with no evolutionary history of adaptation to that pathogen. Viruses closely related to MYXV are found in Sylvilagus bachmani (brush rabbit) on the west coast of the United States and the Baja Peninsula of Mexico (Californian myxoma viruses) and in Sylvilagus floridanus (eastern cottontail) in eastern and central parts of North America (rabbit fibroma virus [RFV]) (2).

European rabbits were introduced into Australia with European settlement in 1788, but the continent-wide spread of rabbits was initiated in 1859 by the introduction of 18 to 24 wild rabbits for hunting. Within 50 years these rabbits had spread over most of Australia with the exception of the wet tropics and the far north (3). The European rabbit became Australia's worst vertebrate pest, responsible for enormous ecological destruction and agricultural losses. Field trials in 1950 to assess MYXV as a biological control resulted in the mosquito-driven epizootic spread of the virus throughout much of southeastern Australia in the summer of 1950 to 1951, and it reemerged the following spring (4). Assisted by large-scale inoculation campaigns, MYXV spread and was established over the rabbit-infested areas of Australia during the next 5 years (2).

The MYXV introduced into Australia, termed Standard Laboratory Strain (SLS), was derived from an isolate made in Brazil, probably in 1910 (2, 5) and subsequently maintained by rabbit passage. Importantly, the original virus used to initiate the epizootic was available to serve as a reference for subsequent field isolates. SLS had a case fatality rate estimated at 99.8% in infected wild rabbits and similar lethality in laboratory rabbits, which are domestic breeds of Oryctolagus cuniculus.

It quickly became apparent that viruses with slightly lower case fatality rates were emerging in the field and outcompeting ongoing releases of the virulent SLS (68). Fenner and Marshall (9) classified the virulence of MYXV into 5 grades based on average survival times, case fatality rates, and symptomatology of groups of 4 to 6 laboratory rabbits infected with very low doses of virus. The predominant viruses in the field were of grade 3 virulence (case fatality rates of 70 to 95%), with average survival times that were prolonged compared to that for SLS (17 to 28 days versus <13 days). Mosquito transmission is a function of the titers of virus in the skin lesions induced by the virus and how long the rabbit survives. By allowing the infected rabbit to survive for longer with high titers of virus, the moderately attenuated viruses had a selection advantage over more-virulent strains. Highly attenuated grade 5 viruses (<50% case fatality rates) tended to be poorly transmitted because the infected rabbits controlled virus replication, in turn reducing transmissibility (10). Importantly, the emergence of more-attenuated virus strains may have facilitated the rapid selection of rabbits with genetic resistance to MYXV (2).

A separate strain of MYXV was released in France in 1952; the virus was obtained from the Laboratory of Bacteriology in Lausanne, Switzerland, and has hence been termed the Lausanne strain (Lu), although like SLS it was originally isolated in Brazil (in Campinas in 1949). Unlike SLS, Lu had undergone relatively few rabbit passages. Lu and SLS have indistinguishable levels of virulence in laboratory rabbits; however, Lu is considerably more virulent than SLS in genetically resistant rabbits. Despite the differences in starting virus, environmental conditions, and insect vectors, the outcome of MYXV-rabbit coevolution in Europe was remarkably similar to that in Australia, with the emergence of attenuated viruses and the selection of rabbits with genetic resistance (11).

The Lu strain of MYXV is considered the reference genome. It has a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome of 161,777 bp with inverted terminal repeats (TIR) of 11,577 bp. It contains 158 unique open reading frames, 12 of which are duplicated in the TIR. Genes located toward the center of the genome tend to be conserved between poxviruses and are essential for replication and structure, whereas those toward the termini tend to be involved in subversion of the host immune response or have host range functions and are less conserved across poxviruses (12).

We have recently outlined the evolutionary patterns and dynamics of the Australian progenitor SLS virus and 19 Australian isolates sampled between 1951 to 1999, as well as two isolates of grade 1 and grade 5 virulence from the early radiation of MYXV in the United Kingdom following the introduction of MYXV there in 1953 (13). To reveal the genetic basis for the phenotypic differences between these viruses, and particularly their profound differences in virulence, we report here the detailed genome sequences of these viruses plus those of an additional five Australian viruses. In addition, we sequenced and analyzed a second strain of KM13 (KM13 2A) and the Lu virus strain produced by the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL) for release in Australia, as well as a grade 3 virus isolated in the United Kingdom in 1954. Such a rich genomic data set enabled us to obtain a more detailed picture of the evolution and geographic spread of this virus through Australia and particularly the broad range of genes involved in this evolutionary process.

Materials and Methods

Virus isolates.

The isolates of MYXV used in this study are described in Table 1.

Table 1.

Origin of strains of MYXV sequenced heree and in reference 13

Virus Formal name Geographic origin Source Reference Virulence grade Region sequencedd Accession no.
SLS (Moses strain/strain B) None given Brazil Rabbit tissue stock (Fenner)a 9 1 1–161777 (161,763) JX565574
Glenfield Aust/Dubbo/2-51/1 Central NSW CV-1 cell stockb 29 1 15–161763 (161,742) JX565567
KM13 Aust/Corowa/12-52/2 Southern NSW Rabbit tissue stock (Fenner) 9 3 1–161777 (161,771) JX565569
KM13 2A Aust/Corowa/12-52/2A Southern NSW Rabbit tissue stock (Fenner) 30 3 1–161777 (161,769) KC660080
Uriarra Aust/Uriarra/2-53/1 Canberra District CV-1 cell stock 29 5 1–161777 (161,768) JX565577
SWH Aust/Southwell Hill/9-92/1 Canberra District Wild rabbit 31 4 1–161777 (161,797) JX565576
BRK Aust/Brooklands/4-93 Canberra District Wild rabbit 31 1 1–161777 (161,701) JX565562
Bendigo Aust/Bendigo/7-92 Central Victoria Wild rabbit 31 1 1–161777 (161,738) JX565565
Meby Aust/Meby/8-91 Tasmania Wild rabbit 31 5 87–161691 (161,542) JX565571
Lu Brazil/Campinas/1949/1 Brazil Commonwealth Serum Laboratories 1973c 1 1–161777 (161,778) JX565570
Cornwall England/Cornwall/4-54/1 Cornwall, UK Rabbit tissue stock (Fenner) 9 1 1–161777 (161,775) JX565566
Sussex England/Sussex/9-54/1 Sussex, UK Rabbit tissue stock (Fenner) 9 3 1–161777 (161,778) KC660084
Nottingham attenuated England/Nottingham/4-55/1 Nottingham, UK Rabbit tissue stock (Fenner) 9 5 1–161777 (161,777) JX565572
Gung/91 Aust/Gungahlin/1-91 Canberra District Wild rabbit 31 4 151–161627 (161,443) JX565568
Wellington Aust/Wellington/1-91 Central NSW Wild rabbit 31 1 29–161749 (161,688) JX565582
BRK/12-2-93 Aust/Brooklands/2-93 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 NDf 140–161638 (161,496) JX565563
BD23 Aust/Bulloo Downs/11-99 Southwest Queensland Wild rabbit 49 ND 285–161555 (161,971) JX565584
BD44 Aust/Bulloo Downs/12-99 Southwest Queensland Wild rabbit 49 ND 1–161777 (162,847) KC660079
BRK/897 Aust/Brooklands/1-95 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 103–161675 (161,545) JX565564
OB1/406 Aust/OB1/Hall/3-94 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 87–161691 (161,612) JX565573
OB2/W60 Aust/OB2/Hall/11-95 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 1–161777 (162,483) KC660081
OB3/Y317 Aust/OB3/Hall/2-94 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 1–161777 (161,748) KC660083
OB3/1120 Aust/OB3/Hall/2-96 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 1–161777 (161,722) KC660082
WS1/234 Australia/Woodstock 1/3-94 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 1–161777 (161,754) JX565578
WS6/1071 Aust/Woodstock 6/11-95 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 41–161737 (161,752) JX565580
WS1/328 Aust/Woodstock 1/3-94 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 156–161622 (161,483) JX565579
WS6/346 Aust/Woodstock 6/3-95 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 140–161638 (161,430) JX565581
SWH/8-2-93 Aust/Southwell Hill/2-93 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 1–161777 (161,740) JX565575
SWH/805 Aust/Southwell Hill/11-93 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 1–161777 (161,780) KC660085
SWH/1209 Aust/Southwell Hill/2-96 Canberra District Wild rabbit 25 ND 33–161745 (162,413) JX565583
a

Virus stocks were originally obtained as freeze-dried rabbit tissue from Frank Fenner, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

b

Virus stocks were from viruses plaque purified as described in reference 29.

c

Virus was from an ampoule of freeze-dried rabbit tissue powder prepared by the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories for rabbit control.

d

Based on the Lu sequence from Cameron et al. (12), 1 to 161777, as corrected by Morales et al. (34); the actual sequence length is shown in parentheses.

e

Boldface indicates data for isolates sequenced for this paper.

f

ND, not determined.

Preparation of DNA.

Viruses were passaged twice in RK13 cells to prepare working stocks; viral DNA was prepared from infected RK13 cells as previously described (13).

Sequencing, assembly, and comparative analyses.

The seven virus samples newly reported here were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Demultiplexed and trimmed sequence reads were assembled with the Velvet de novo assembler (14) using a range of k-mer values from 59 to 77 and an expected coverage of 600×. Contigs containing MYXV genomic DNA were identified by BLASTX searches and were ordered into a single scaffold against the Lu genome (accession no. AF170726) using the Abacas.pl script (15). The quality of each scaffold was verified by remapping the untrimmed reads to the assembly using Smalt (www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/software/smalt/); the resulting BAM files were converted to pileup format to verify the read coverage at each site. Read coverage line plots for scaffolds at each k-mer value were generated in R and examined by eye. In general, we found that scaffolds generated at high k-mers (greater than 65) resulted in single contig assemblies of the MYXV genomes, but inspection of coverage plots revealed many low-coverage regions. Further examination of these low-coverage areas revealed that these were large insertions unique to the strain in question compared to the 23 previously sequenced strains of MYXV (13). Assemblies at lower k-mer values (51 to 65) were often fragmented into multiple contigs but showed even read coverage across contigs corresponding to MYXV segments. Further, these were of the expected lengths relative to the 23 previously sequenced strains (13). Gaps, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and indels of interest were closed by Sanger sequencing of PCR products. In every case, only one complete, or nearly complete, copy of the terminal inverted repeat (TIR) was assembled at either the 5′ or the 3′ end, though up to a full read length of the complementary TIR was observed at the opposite end, allowing easy identification of the TIR junction. To further verify the position of the TIR junction, we duplicated the complete TIR, generated a reverse complement of the sequence that was added on the opposite end, and remapped the sequence reads to that assembled portion of the genome.

Genome annotation was transferred from the Lu strain to the newly sequenced MYXV genomes using the Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool (16). EMBL flat files of transferred gene models were then inspected and compared to Lu using the Artemis comparison tool (17); incorrect models were corrected, and new gene models were added where transfer had not occurred. Genes are numbered based on their location in the MYXV genome, with the direction of transcription indicated by L or R (e.g., M010L). Genes in the TIR are identified by L/R (e.g., M007L/R). Proteins are identified by the same number as the gene with the transcription direction omitted, e.g., M010.

To generate the heat maps for the comparative analyses of each gene to the SLS and Lu strains, we used a custom Perl script to produce multi-FASTA files containing all taxa in which this gene was present. Sequence alignments were generated using ClustalW (18), and PAUP* 4.0b10 (19) was used to remove ambiguous and gapped sites from the alignments and generate the number of SNP mutations in each gene. Columns from the distance matrix comparing viral taxa to SLS were parsed, and two subsequent matrices were generated, one for European strains compared to Lu and one for Australian strains compared to SLS.

Evolutionary analysis.

A total of 30 genome sequences of MYXV were subjected to phylogenetic analysis, with a total alignment length of 163,555 nucleotides (nt). Sequences were aligned by MAFFT (20), then inspected by eye. Phylogenetic analysis employed the maximum likelihood (ML) method, available in PhyML 3.0 (21). Because of the very low numbers of substitutions separating these sequences, we employed the HKY85 model of nucleotide substitution (22) with subtree pruning and regrafting (SPR) branch swapping. To assess the robustness of each node on the tree, a bootstrap resampling analysis was undertaken (1,000 replicates) employing the parameters described above. To determine whether these 30 MYXV genomes contain any recombinant regions, we utilized the RDP, GENECOV, and BOOTSCAN methods available within the RDP4 package (23) and the default parameters. As with our previous study (13), no recombination was observed.

To estimate the rates of evolutionary change and times to common ancestry in these data (including those of two key nodes shown in Fig. 1), we employed the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, available in the BEAST package (24). This analysis utilized both strict and relaxed (uncorrelated log normal) molecular clocks, a Bayesian skyline coalescent prior, and the HKY85 nucleotide substitution mode. The MCMC was run for 100 million generations, and convergence was observed in all parameters. Statistical uncertainly is presented as values for the 95% highest-probability density (HPD).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Phylogeny and phylogeography of MYXV isolates. Samples are color-coded according to place of sampling (BRK [Brooklands], green; OB, pink, SWH [Southwell Hill], red; WS [Woodstock], blue), while the state or region of sampling is noted in parentheses (ACT, Australian Capital Territory; CD, Canberra District; NSW, New South Wales; QLD, Queensland; TA, Tasmania; VIC, Victoria). Viruses newly sequenced here are marked with an asterisk. The phylogenetic distribution of mutation and reversion in the M029L gene and of mutation in the M156R gene is also shown. Bootstrap values are shown for key nodes, and all horizontal branches are drawn according to the number of nucleotide substitutions per year. Divergence times (95% HPD values) for two key nodes in the Australian part of the phylogeny were inferred from the BEAST analysis (see Materials and Methods).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The seven new MYXV genome assemblies have been deposited on GenBank under accession numbers KC660079 to KC660085.

RESULTS

Evolution and phylogeography of MYXV.

Our phylogenetic analysis of 30 complete MYXV genomes, including 5 new Australian isolates sampled during 1993 to 1999 and an early attenuated isolate from the United Kingdom sampled in 1954, depicted the major division between the Australian and European epidemics observed previously (Fig. 1) (13), with no evidence of recombination. In addition, that all the recently sampled Australian viruses (1991 to 1999) are clearly distinct from both SLS and Lu indicates that these two viruses made no significant contribution to the later evolution of MYXV in Australia even though they were introduced multiple times over many years. Hence, these data suggest that all (sampled) Australian MYXV strains have their ancestry in the initial introduction of SLS in 1950, although the close phylogenetic relationship among the sequences means that we cannot determine whether the Glenfield (Gv) strain, which was also widely released in NSW and Victoria, made any contribution to the spread of MYXV. Our estimates of rates of nucleotide substitution—at 0.8 × 10−5 to 1.1 × 10−5 nucleotide substitutions per site per year (95% HPD values)—and times to common ancestry were also essentially identical to those observed previously (13). Hence, these data again indicate that the evolution of MYXV is both relatively rapid (for a dsDNA virus) and remarkably clocklike.

A visual overview of genome scale genetic variation, manifest as the genetic distance of each gene from the progenitor strain—SLS for the Australian isolates and Lu for the European isolates—is represented by heat maps (Fig. 2A and B, respectively). These maps reveal that the majority of genes remain highly conserved, with a few genes exhibiting more diversity. An example of the latter is M017L. Although the function of this gene is unknown, it has acquired mutations in the majority of the Australian strains compared to SLS (Fig. 2A; Table 2). Multiple genes (M003.1L/R, M103L, M105L, and M132L) have acquired mutations in OB3/1120/1996 and WS6/1071/1995, which are linked to the other MYXV strains by a relatively long branch (Fig. 1). However, of these, only M103L encodes a protein with a predicted function (structural membrane protein), while the majority of mutations involved are commonplace and/or synonymous ones exhibiting no clear association with changing virulence. Similarly, with the exception of the attenuated Spanish isolate 6918, which appears as genetically distant based on this and the phylogenetic analyses, the European isolates have very few mutations compared to Lu (Fig. 2B), reflecting their sampling early in the epidemic.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Heat maps showing the number of SNP mutations in each gene from the SLS (A) and Lu (B) strains. Genes are organized in rows according to their order in the reference genome, and taxa are ordered along columns by their branching order in the MYXV phylogeny.

Table 2.

Mutations from SLS conserved in Australian MYXV isolatesa

SLS position Genek Protein functione Mutation No. of viruses
1968 M002L/R TNF binding/apoptosis inhibition A226V 21 (all recent)
2576 M002L/R TNF binding/apoptosis inhibition Synonymous GCG→GCA 24 (all Australian)
3168 M003.1L/R PRRe signal inhibition? A37V 21 (all recent)
5082 M005L/R Apoptosis inhibition/Ub ligase R434W 21 (all recent)
5756 M005L/R Apoptosis inhibition/Ub ligase S209Y 21 (all recent)
11484 Intergenic A→G 13
12348 M009L Putative Ub ligase A261V 16b
12715 M009L Putative Ub ligase Frameshift T insert 420 20 (including Meby)c
16042 M014L Putative Ub ligase V175I 21 (all recent)
16201 M014L Putative Ub ligase G122W 21 (all recent)
16478 M014L Putative Ub ligase Synonymous GTC→GTT 18
16615 Intergenic A deletion 13 (includes Ur)
16923 M015L Ribonucleotide reductase Synonymous GAA→GAG 21 (all recent)
17332 M015L Ribonucleotide reductase V85A 21 (all recent)
17877 M017L ? E71K 21 (all recent)
18236 Intergenic Multiple GTAGGTAG insert 21
18250 Intergenic Multiple AGTTTAGT insert 17
18277 Intergenic T→C 21 (all recent)
21578 M021L EV maturation; VACF12L orthologue D315N 14
23608 M022L EVg protein Synonymous GTC→GTT 21 (all recent)
24933 M025L VACV F16 orthologue M11I 20
28185 M028L EV formation S244L 18
36832 M034L DNA polymerase Synonymous TTC→TTT 21 (all recent)
38437 M036L VACV O1 orthologue C270Y 22 (all recent and KM13)
38987 M036L VACV O1 orthologue Synonymous CTG→TTG 21 (all recent)
41406 Intergenic T insert 20
47167 M045L Virion morphogenesis D263N 21 (all recent)
50515 M049R VACV G5 orthologue Synonymous CTG→TTG 21 (all recent)
52256 M052L Core structural protein S29N 21 (all recent)
55900 M057L Core protein L90V 21 (all recent)
57398 M060R Virion protein Synonymous GCG→GCA 21 (all recent)
58821 M062R Host range K142T 20
59512 M063R Host range S195C 21 (all recent)
59585 Intergenic T deletion 20
60567 M065R Poly(A) poli subunit T98 M 21 (all recent)
64305 M068R RNA pol subunit Synonymous ACG→ACA 22
70115 M072L RNA pol-associated transcription factor I150T 22
82120 M083L CA homologue/virion protein G insert 21 (all recent)
85496 M086L DNA helicase Synonymous CGA→CGG 21 (all recent)
99168 M099L Core protein precursor Synonymous GCG→GCA 20
112683 M114R RNA pol subunit P1147H 12
115902 M121R CLECTh EV protein S21F 20
119939 M127L Photolyase Synonymous 1107 AGC→AGT 15
123409 M132L ? C133Y 18
125935 M134R Membrane protein S84P 21 (all recent)
128748 M134R Membrane protein Synonymous GCG→GCA 21 (all recent)
131595 M134R Membrane protein AAA insert (K) 22
133151 M137R VACV A51 orthologue Synonymous GGC→GGT 20
135593 M140R Putative Ub ligase P76H 24
142764 M148R Putative Ub ligase L383F 21 (all recent)
145699 M150R Putative Ub ligase P173S 21 (all recent)
147192 M151R Serpin (Serp 2) R173G 21 (all recent)
148711 M153R Ub ligase MHC-1 downregulation Synonymous TGT→TGC 17
149127 M153R Ub ligase MHC-1 downregulation L204S 19 (24) (all Australian)d
149717 M154R VACV M2 orthologue/NF-κB inhibition? Y53C 19
149836 M154L VACV M2 orthologue/NF-κB inhibition? Synonymous 39 GTC→GTT 13
150280 M156R eIF2α homologue (IFN resistance) L98P 13
a

Mutations shared by 12 or more viruses.

b

SWH/1209, OB3/1120, BD44, and BD23 have deletions of the associated region of M009L.

c

Meby was isolated in Tasmania not on mainland Australia. All other Australian isolates were from the mainland. There are 21 isolates from 1991 to 1999.

d

All Australian isolates sequenced have the nucleotide mutation at SLS 149127, but Gv, WS6/1071, BD44, and Meby have frameshift mutations that alter the reading frame of M153R and Wellington has a 9-nucleotide deletion which shifts the amino acid mutation to L201S.

e

?, unknown; —, not applicable.

f

PRR, pattern recognition receptor.

g

EV, enveloped virus.

h

CLECT, C-type lectin.

i

pol, polymerase.

k

Mutations duplicated in TIR are indicated by L/R in the gene name and are only shown at the LH end of the genome.

To reveal aspects of the phylogeography of MYXV, we coded the Australian isolates by their state of origin (Fig. 1), in which CD delineates viruses that were sampled in close proximity to each other (within 10 to 15 km) in the Canberra District, which straddles the NSW/Australian Capital Territory (ACT) border in southeastern Australia (see below). Strikingly, BD23 and BD44, sampled from hot, dry rangelands at Bulloo Downs in southwest Queensland in 1999, are very closely related to viruses (OB2/W60/1995 and SWH/1209/1996) sampled 3 to 4 years earlier from the cool-climate, higher-rainfall Canberra district, approximately 1,000 km away. Also of interest is the Meby strain, sampled from Tasmania, which is separated from mainland Australia by the Bass Strait, which is up to 240 km wide. Although SLS was released in Tasmania in the early 1950s following its spread on the mainland, Meby is clearly descended from a mainland virus that diverged in the late 1960s and has then remained isolated since this time (Fig. 1). It is therefore possible that the virus reached Tasmania from the mainland on a mosquito inadvertently transported by ship or plane. The majority of the sequenced viruses were isolated between 1993 and 1996 from a set of seven closely situated study sites (WS1, WS6, OB1, OB2, OB3, SWH, and BRK) in the Canberra district (25, 26). From the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1) it is obvious that viral lineages have cocirculated at a single locality during a specific time period. In general, these results highlight the relative rapidity of MYXV movement, likely aided by mosquito transmission, including a dispersal of over 1,000 km during 1950.

Comparison of the SLS and Lu sequences.

SLS was the original virus released in Australia in 1950. We compared the complete genome sequence of SLS to that of the Lu strain. These two progenitor strains have differences in symptomatology, virulence, and passage history prior to release. Overall, there are 80 nucleotide differences (0.05% difference), including indels, between SLS and Lu (72 if TIRs are counted in only one copy) (Table 3). However, frameshifts in M005L/R, M083L, and M152R due to indels also produce multiple amino acid changes in SLS compared to the Lu sequence: M005L/R, which codes for an E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase/apoptosis regulator, is disrupted by a C insert at nucleotide 34. It is likely that translation occurs from an alternative ATG from nucleotide 17 that does not change the ANK repeats and the C-terminal F-box domain of the M005 protein. M083L is disrupted by a C deletion in a homopolymer tract at nucleotide 513. M083 is homologous to rabbit carbonic anhydrase (12) and is probably a virion structural protein. Finally, there is a T deletion in a homopolymer toward the 3′ end of the M152R (Serp 3) gene at nucleotide 782; read-through of the Lu stop codon leads to a predicted protein of 273 amino acids in SLS rather than 266 amino acids in Lu. These indels are also present in Australian isolates of MYXV sampled between 1951 and 1953, confirming that the mutations were present in the progenitor virus. It is likely that one of these frameshift mutations explains the reduced virulence of SLS compared to that of Lu.

Table 3.

Genome changes in SLS compared to Lua

Lu position Lu sequence SLS sequence SLS position Gene Mutation and/or location Protein function
22 A b 21 Noncoding
621 A C 621 Noncoding
2577 C T 2577 M002L Sync GCG→GCA (A) nt 69 TNF binding/apoptosis regulator
2794 G 2793 Intergenic Bwd M003.1 and M002
6092 C T 6091 M005L D98N GAC→AAC nt 297 E3 Ub ligase/apoptosis regulator
6349 G 6349 M005L Frameshift E3 Ub ligase/apoptosis regulator
6351 A G 6351 M005L Syn CCT→CCC (P) nt 34 E3 Ub ligase/apoptosis regulator
9370 G A 9370 M008L Syn GAC→GAT (D) nt 1005 Putative E3 Ub ligase
13169 G T 13169 Intergenic Bw M009L and M10L
18237–18244 GGTATGTA 18235 Intergenic Bw 17L and 18L tandem repeat
20976 C T 20967 M021L Syn CAG→CAA (Q) nt 1554 EV maturation
22645 C T 22636 M022L Syn ACG→ACA (T) nt 1032 EV protein
25039 G A 25030 M026R A9T GCA→ACA nt 25 DNA binding phosphoprotein
30013 T C 30004 M030L T10A ACA→GCA nt 28 RNA pol subunit
36188 T C 36179 M034L Y227C TAT→TGT nt 680 DNA pol
38319 G A 38310 M036L Syn TTC→TTT (F) nt 936 VACV O1L orthologue
40605–40607 TTC 40595 M040L E 258 deleted DNA binding phosphoprotein
48097 G A 48085 M046L Syn CCC→CCT (P) nt 201 Membrane protein
48780 A G 48768 M047R T164A ACA→GCA nt 490 Late gene expression regulator
53704 T C 53692 M054R Syn CGT→CGC (R) nt 519 Membrane fusion complex
54952 A G 54940 Intergenic Immediately 5′ to M056R
55308 C T 55296 M057L S291N AGT→AAT nt 872 Core protein
56431 C T 56419 M058R Syn ATC→ATT(I) nt 228 Core protein
57922 A T 57910 M061R K41N AAA→AAT (K) nt 123 Thymidine kinase
60376 A G 60364 M065R Syn ACA→ACG (T) nt 90 Poly(A) pol regulatory subunit
62205 T 62194 Intergenic Immediately 5′ to M068R
67449 C T 67438 M071L Syn TCG→TCA (S) nt 735 Membrane protein
74445 G A 74434 M076R Syn TCG→TCA (S) nt 1740 mRNA capping enzyme
80489 A G 80478 M081R Q371R CAG→CGG nt 1112 Early transcription factor subunit
82131 G 82119 M083L C deletion at 513 →reading frameshift Carbonic anhydrase homology/membrane protein
82179 C T 82167 M083L Syn CTG→CTA (L) nt 462 Carbonic anhydrase homology/membrane protein
83974 A G 83962 M085R Syn GTA→GTG (V) nt 669 VACV D10R orthologue
87056 A C 87044 M088L Syn TCT→TCG (S) nt 1494 Virion protein
90140 T C 90128 M092L Syn GCA→GCG (A) nt 1790 Core protein
118290 T C 118278 M124R Syn GGT→GGC (G) nt774 Unknown
123774 T C 123762 M132L Syn GTA→GTG (V) nt 45 Unknown
128789 C T 128777 M134R S1031L TCG→TTG nt 3092 Membrane protein
129085 G T 129073 M134R A1130S GCT→TCT nt 3388 Membrane protein
130326 C T 130314 M134R Syn GGC→GGT (G) nt 4629 Membrane protein
131079 C T 131067 M134R Syn GAC→GAT (D) nt 5382 Membrane protein
131133 T C 131121 M134R Syn GCG→GCC (A) nt 5436 Membrane protein
131176 C T 131164 M134R Syn GTG→TTG (L) nt 5479 Membrane protein
131187 C A 131175 M134R Syn ACC→ACA (T) nt 5490 Membrane protein
131230 A G 131218 M134R T1845A ACG→GCG nt 5533 Membrane protein
131238 G C 131226 M134R E1847D GAG→GAC nt 5541 Membrane protein
131259 T C 131247 M134R Syn GAT→GAC (D) nt 5562 Membrane protein
131316 A G 131304 M134R Syn GCA→GCG (A) nt 5619 Membrane protein
131328 G A 131316 M134R Syn CCC→CCA (P) nt 5631 Membrane protein
131377 A G 131365 M134R T1894A ACA→GCA nt 5680 Membrane protein
131424 C T 131412 M134R Syn GAC→GAT (D) nt 5727 Membrane protein
131487 G A 131475 M134R M1930I ATG→ATA nt 5790 Membrane protein
131550 G A 131538 M134R Syn GGG→GGA (G) nt 5853 Membrane protein
132122 G A 132110 M135R Syn GCG→GCA (A) nt 420 Immune modulation/virulence
133197 G A 133185 M137R D96N GAC→AAC nt 286 VACV A51
133552 A G 133540 M137R D214G GAC→GGC nt 641 VACV A51
134435 C T 134423 M138L D106N GAC→AAC nt 316 α-2,3-Sialyltransferase
141046 T C 141034 M147R S115P TCG→CCG nt 3343 S/T-specific protein kinase
147887 G A 147875 M152R A66T GCA→ACA nt 196 Serp 3
148316 A G 148304 M152R T209A ACA→GCA nt 625 Serp 3
148375 A G 148363 M152R Syn GCG→GCA (A) nt 684 Serp 3
148472 T 148459 M152R nt 782; readthrough Serp 3
149140 C T 149127 M153 S204L TCA→TTA nt 611 E3 Ub ligase/MHC-1 downregulation
149864 C T 149851 M154L Syn GTG→GTA (A) nt 24 NF-κB regulation
a

Mutations in the TIR are only shown at the left hand TIR.

b

—, nucleotide deleted.

c

Syn, synonymous.

d

Bw, between.

Comparisons of SLS with subsequent Australian isolates.

We sequenced three isolates of MYXV that had been sampled within the first 3 years of the initial epizootic of myxomatosis in Australia and that had been previously characterized in terms of virulence (9): the Gv strain (Dubbo/Feb 1951; grade 1 virulence), KM13 (Corowa/Dec 1952; the prototype grade 3 virus), and Uriarra (Ur) (Uriarra/Feb 1953; grade 5 virulence [27]). Amino acid sequence changes and gene disruptions between SLS and these three viruses are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.

Coding changes and indels in viruses from 1951 to 1953 compared to SLS

Gene Protein function (no. of aab) Changea for virus:
Glenfield (1951, grade 1) KM13 (1952, grade 3) Ur (1953, grade 5)
M005L/R Host range/E3 Ub ligase (478) ORF disrupted by C nt insc at 30
M014L E3 Ub ligase (517) ORF disrupted by C nt ins at 1405 ORF disrupted by C nt ins at 1405 ORF disrupted by C nt ins at 1405
M036L VACV O1 orthologue (680) C270Y* F293L
M044R RNA helicase (678) R606H
M071L Virion protein (324) E172K
M072L RNA pol-associated transcription factor (796) I150T*
M108R DNA helicase (478) F18I
M114R RNA pol subunit (1,155) A686V
M130R Unknown (122) ORF disrupted by G ins at 30 f
M134R Surface glycoprotein (2,000) AAA nt ins* K AAA ins* K A nt ins→premature stop at 1973
M137R Orthologue to VACV A51 (310) A308T
M140R E3 Ub ligase (553) P76H* P76H* P76H*
M141R OX-2 homologue (218) S45 insert
M153R RING CH E3 Ub ligase (206) ORF disrupted by G nt deletion at 329 L240S* L240S*
a

∗, present in all modern isolates from Australia.

b

aa, amino acids.

c

ins, insert.

Three of the nonsynonymous mutations in Gv, which is more virulent than SLS, are in enzymes involved in viral transcription and replication, M044 (RNA helicase: R606H; the R is conserved in chordopoxvirus sequences), M108 (DNA helicase: F18I; only MYXV and RFV have F at this position; other chordopoxviruses have I, M, or L), and M114 (RNA polymerase: A686V; the A is completely conserved at this position in chordopoxvirus sequences), each of which could affect replication efficiency. M014L, M130R, and M153R all have single-nucleotide indels that disrupt the reading frame. The single-nucleotide indel in M014L causes premature termination at residue 477, making the protein smaller than the 517-amino-acid SLS protein. This indel is also present in Ur and KM13, indicating that the mutation arose early on. M014 has an N-terminal BTB motif and C-terminal kelch motifs and is predicted to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that targets cellular proteins to the proteosome for destruction (28). This truncation would delete the final kelch domain, potentially altering target protein recognition. However, the role of M014 in virulence is unknown, as is that of M130R. The large number of gene disruptions in Gv suggests that this virus may be a variant selected during previous plaque purification (29) from which this virus was obtained. The likely explanation for the attenuation of KM13 is the disruption to M014L. Although this mutation is also present in the virulent Gv, there is no other obvious mutation that might lead to the attenuation of KM13. To further assist in the documentation of virulence determinants, we also sequenced a laboratory variant of KM13 reported to have a lower case fatality rate (KM13 2A) (2, 30). The only difference between KM13 and KM13 2A appears to be an extra A in a noncoding sequence of KM13.

Also of note is that Ur has an extra C inserted after nucleotide 30 in M005L/R. This means that the alternative ATG, which we predict to be used by SLS and all other Australian viruses sequenced here, does not create a sense open reading frame (ORF) in Ur. The only downstream ATG that is compatible with an ORF is at nt 308; translation from this ATG would produce a 382-residue protein with 5 ANK repeats and the C-terminal F-box compared to 7 ANK repeats in the 478-residue SLS protein. However, there is no convincing promoter sequence upstream of this ATG. This is likely the main attenuating mutation in Ur. Ur also has an A insert in a homopolymer tract toward the 3′ end of M134R at nucleotide 5911, the same location as the 3A insert in Gv and KM13 (Table 4). This leads to a predicted truncated protein of 1,973 amino acid residues, rather than the 2,000 residues of the SLS and Lu proteins, which retains the predicted C-terminal transmembrane domain that is conserved across the Chordopoxvirinae.

Recent Australian isolates.

In total, we determined sequences for 21 Australian viruses isolated between 1991 and 1999, 6 of which had been characterized by virulence assays: Bendigo, Wellington, BRK (grade 1), SWH, Gung (grade 4), and Meby (grade 5) (31). All of these viruses have the C insertion at 35 in M005L/R and the T deletion in M152R seen in SLS. However, the indel in M083L present in SLS, Ur, Gv, and KM13 has reverted in every Australian isolate sequenced from the 1990s. Similarly, the indel disrupting the M014L gene found in Gv, Ur, and KM13 is not present in any of the more recent isolates. All the isolates have the 3A indel in M134R seen in Gv and KM13. However, the underlying sequence reads that map to that genomic region indicate that there is a subpopulation of viruses in OB3/1120 that have a 2A insertion, rather than a 3A insertion; this 2A indel would lead to disruption of the M134R ORF. A similar subpopulation with the 2A insert was seen in Ur, which has a majority population with a single A insert. Homopolymer sequences such as those in M134R are common in MYXV, and poly(A) or poly(T) tracts are common at the 3′ ends of genes and in the intergenic sequence, where they are frequently part of promoter structures for the downstream gene or the T5NT early transcription termination signal. In the Australian isolates, 13 of 16 single-base indels that occur in coding sequences (Table 5) occur in homopolymer tracts of 4 or more bases, and there are 17 positions with single-base indels in intergenic homopolymers involving one or more viruses (positions in TIRs have been counted only once). Polymerase slippage leading to read-throughs or premature termination (e.g., SLS M152R) may facilitate evolutionary plasticity, allowing slight changes in protein sequences. Indels either in homopolymers or repeat sequence can also lead to gene disruption, in turn affecting virulence (32, 33), and also function to repair ORFs, as in the case for M083L.

Table 5.

Insertion and deletions in coding regions of Australian MYXV isolates

SLS positiona Gene Protein function Mutation and contextc Effect Virus(es) (virulence grade if known)
408 M000.5L/R ?b G del Frameshift from aa 58 and read-through stop codon BD44
5533 M005L/R Apoptosis inhibition/host range C insert (homopol) Stop after aa 317 WS6/346
6352 M005L/R Apoptosis inhibition/host range C insert (homopol) ORF disruption Ur (5)
10663 M008.1L/R Serpin CC insert (homopol) ORF disruption BD44
11626 M009L Putative Ub ligase A del (homopol) ORF disruption SWH/8-2-93
12170 M009L Putative Ub ligase TA insert (TA repeat) ORF disruption BRK (1)
12715 M009L Putative Ub ligase A insert (homopol) ORF disruption All recent Australian strains except Bendigo (1)
12809 M009L Putative Ub ligase A del ORF disruption WS6/1071, OB3/1120
14397 M012L dUTP pyrophosphatase 13 nt del ORF disruption OB3/Y317
15164 M014L Putative Ub ligase G insert (homopol) ORF disruption Gv (1), KM13 (3), Ur (5)
18324 M018L Cytoplasmic protein; VACV F8L orthologue TT insert Frameshift from aa 60; read-through adds 20 aa OB3/Y317
22511 M021L EV maturation; VACV F12L orthologue 9-nt insert (duplication) Duplicates LLG aa 4–6 OB3/Y317
38589–38680 M036L VACV O1 orthologue 92-base deletion ORF disruption BRK (1)
40596 M040L DNA binding phosphoprotein TCT duplication E258 inserted Bendigo (1)
58322 M061R Thymidine kinase T insert (homopol) Read-through adds LKY to C terminus WS1/234
59143 M063R Host range ACC duplication H72 duplicated Gung/91 (4)
59554–59568 M063R Host range 15 base del of repeat sequence Deletes TEEEE from a repeat at the C terminus WS6/346
60122–60124 M064R Host range? AGA del (tandem repeat) E deleted OB1/406; BRK/12-2-93
60122–60124 M064R Host range? AGA inserted (tandem repeat) E 168 inserted Well (1); WS1/234; BRK/897; SWH/805; OB3/Y317
82120 M083L CA homologue/structural G insert (homopol) Corrects G deletion in SLS All recent Australian strains
92163 M093L Core protein GGAAAC duplication VP duplication SWH (4)
113080 M115L Fusion protein CTTCGT del 66D 67E deleted Gung/91 (4)
122397 M130R ? G insert (homopol) ORF disrupted Gv (1)
131595 M134R Transmembrane protein AAA insert (homopol) K insert All Australian strains except Ur (A) and SLS; OB3/1120 has 2A subpopulation
131595 M134R Transmembrane protein A insert (homopol) Truncates ORF, early stop Ur (5)
137195 M141R OX-2 homologue; downregulation of macrophage activation AGT insert (tandem repeats) S insert in repeat sequence Gv (1)
141092 M147R S/T-specific protein kinase GT del (tandem repeat) Repeat sequence disrupts ORF BD23
148485 M152R Serp 3 A del (homopol) Premature stop 271 (SLS 273) WS6/1071; OB3/1120
148845 M153R Ub ligase/MHC-1 downregulation G del (homopol) ORF disruption, early stop after aa 118 GV (1)
148845 M153R Ub ligase/MHC-1 downregulation G insert (homopol) ORF disruption, early stop after aa 124 BD44
148985 M153R Ub ligase/MHC-1 downregulation T del ORF disruption, stop after aa 161 WS6/1071; OB3/1120
149018 M153R Ub ligase/MHC-1 downregulation 73 bp del between repeats Sequence read-through replaces CR domain of M153 Meby (5)
149062–149070 M153R Ub ligase/MHC-1 downregulation 9 bp del in duplicated sequence VEE repeat deleted from CR domain Well (1)
150294 M156R eIF2α homologue; IFN resistance T del (homopol) Read through stop, extra EG at C terminus WS6/346; OB3/Y317
a

Sequence positions are for the Australian progenitor SLS; mutations in genes within the TIRs are shown only for the left-hand TIR.

b

?, unknown.

c

del, deletion; homopol, homopolymer.

All but one of the recent isolates have a frameshift mutation due to a single nucleotide insertion in a homopolymer tract in M009L, a member of a three-gene family (M006L/R, M008L/R, and M009L) (12) that are predicted to encode E3 ubiquitin ligases with N-terminal BTB domains followed by kelch motifs (28). The insertion at nucleotide 420 produces a truncated protein of 146 rather than 509 residues. In addition, four viruses have further mutations that disrupt the reading frame, and M009L is also disrupted in viruses that have gene duplications from the right hand (RH) end of the genome (see below), implying that this gene is nonessential. BRK has a 92-bp deletion in the M036L gene, which leads to a truncated protein of only 212 residues rather than 680 in the SLS protein. The function of this gene (an orthologue of vaccinia virus [VACV] O1L) in MYXV is unknown, but in VACV the O1 protein enhances signaling via Erk1/2 by the viral epidermal growth factor (VGF) homologue and increases virulence (60). As BRK is of grade 1 virulence (31), M036L is unlikely to be crucial for virulence in this virus. In this respect, the attenuated United Kingdom isolates Sussex (1954; grade 3) and Nottingham (1955; grade 5) also have a common indel that disrupts the M036L ORF, and the attenuated Spanish isolate 6918 has an independent disruption in M036L (34). Both Nottingham and 6918 possess other mutations that explain attenuation. However, the disruption in M036L is the only one in Sussex, suggesting that it may play some role in virulence.

ORF-disrupting mutations were also common in M153R, which encodes a protein with an N-terminal RING-CH domain, which is predicted to form an E3 Ub ligase complex and which downregulates major histocompatibility complex class 1 (MHC-1), CD4, ALCAM/CD166, and Fas/CD95 on the membranes of infected cells, potentially inhibiting CD8+ T lymphocyte recognition and death signaling. Deletion of this gene in the T1 Lu-derived strain reduced the case fatality rate from 100% to 30% (3537). Meby, a grade 5 virus, has a 73-bp deletion between repeat sequence blocks (AATACG) in the region of M153R encoding the C-terminal conserved region (CR) (31, 35) of the 206-amino-acid protein, which leads to read-through of the normal stop signal and a completely changed C-terminal protein sequence after residue 168. A single nucleotide deletion at nt 469 in WS6/1071 and OB3/1120 leads to a stop after residue 161 and removes the CR region but retains the N-terminal RING-CH domain and two putative transmembrane domains at 95 to 115 and 135 to 153 (35). Gv and BD44 both have truncated proteins of 118 and 124 residues due to an independent indel at nt 329. Other indels causing significant disruption to ORFs were found only in single viruses: M000.5L/R (BD44; unknown function), M008.1L/R (BD44; secreted serine proteinase inhibitor; virulence function), M005L/R (WS6/346; host range; virulence function), M012L (OB3/Y317; dUTPase), and M147R (BD23; Ser/Thr-specific protein kinase) (Table 5). The disruptions to M008.1L/R in BD44 and M005L/R in WS6/346 might be expected to attenuate these viruses (38, 39).

Gene duplications.

The inverted terminal repeat regions of poxviruses contain noncoding terminal regions essential for replication but also contain different numbers of genes, depending on the location of the TIR boundary. These genes typically have virulence or host range functions, but the number of genes can vary greatly. This region also appears to be a potential recombination hot spot, as shown by recombination and deletions, including those in malignant rabbit virus, a recombinant between MYXV and RFV (40), or the MYXV SG33 vaccine strain (41).

Two genes, M154L and M156R, which are normally found as single copies outside the RH TIR, with M156R overlapping the TIR boundary, have been duplicated at the left hand (LH) TIR in the common ancestor of SWH/1209, OB2/W60, BD44, and BD23. In addition, the M153R gene has been partially duplicated (Fig. 3). This duplication is essentially an expansion of the TIR by 1,635 bp, 36 nt downstream of the M153R ATG start codon, meaning that M153R now overlaps the TIR junction (25). At the LH end of the genome, this duplicated sequence has replaced 923 bp of the M009L gene, leaving only the 5′ 608 bp; however, the M009L ORF is disrupted after codon 146 due to a T insert at nt 420. M156 is an orthologue of the VACV K3 protein and is predicted to inhibit the action of type 1 interferon (IFN) (42). M154 is an orthologue of VACV M2 and so may inhibit NF-κB (12, 43). At the LH end, M153R lacks the 5′ 36 nucleotides and upstream promoter, and the insert is not in frame with the M009L sequence. Interestingly, this duplication was observed in the Canberra region in viruses isolated in 1995 and 1996 and is also present in viruses isolated from southwest Queensland in 1999; that viruses with this deletion occupy such a wide geographic area means that the deletion is unlikely to have an adverse effect on fitness. Whether this duplication of two potential virulence genes increases virulence or compensates for other mutations by increasing expression of these proteins is not known.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Expansion of the TIR boundaries in SWH/1209, OB2/W60, BD23, and BD24. Duplication of the 1,635-nucleotide region outside the right-hand (RH) TIR containing M153R to M156R and inversion and insertion of this sequence at the left-hand (LH) TIR are shown. This replaces the 3′ 923 nucleotides of M009L at the LH end; there are now complete copies of M156 and M154 at each end of the genome, but M153 has lost the 5′ 36 nucleotides and promoter at the LH end of the genome. M156R originally spanned the TIR boundary at the RH end of the genome. The sequence in the TIR was present at the LH end as noncoding DNA. Note that the Lu genome annotation does not use the M155 gene number.

Finally, two intergenic repeat sequence regions have been defined as being variable in Australian field isolates (25, 31), one between M017L and M018L, with 2 to 8 extra copies of a GTATGTAG repeat compared to SLS and 1 or 2 extra copies of an AGTTTAGT repeat (Fig. 4A), and the other immediately upstream of the M002 gene in the TIR, with 27 or 39 nucleotides deleted in 10 recent Australian isolates (Fig. 4B). That the latter duplication occurs on multiple branches of the phylogenetic tree indicates that it has been gained or lost in different viral lineages.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Insertions and deletions in noncoding repeat sequence regions in MYXV isolates.

Promoter sequences.

Alterations in gene expression and potentially virulence could occur due to changes in promoters. The poxvirus early (E), intermediate (I), and late (L) promoter sequences are conserved in the leporipoxviruses (44). Six viruses have mutations with a potential impact on putative promoters. WS6/346 has a T deletion in the upstream T tract of the M008.1L/R L promoter (Fig. 5A); OB1/406 has an extra T in the upstream T tract of the L promoter for M057L (Fig. 5B). G91 has a mutation in a putative weak L promoter for M000.5L/R, but whether this ORF is expressed has not been determined (Fig. 5C). SWH/8-2-93 has an extra A inserted in the potential E promoter for M138L (Fig. 5D), which might be predicted to enhance the promoter structure based on consensus early promoter sequences (44). WS6/1071 and OB3/1120 have an A deleted in the 3′ end of the potential E promoter of M153R (Fig. 5E), which could have an impact on promoter activity. However, both viruses also have a deletion at nt 321 in M153R, which disrupts the ORF.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Sequence mutations in 5 potential promoter regions. (A) M008.1L/R late promoter. There is a TAAAT late promoter motif (italicized) incorporating the ATG start codon (in red). This is preceded by a 6-nt spacer and then a run of 8 Ts (underlined), which is typical of strong late promoters (spacer of 4 to 10 nt and then a T-rich tract of 5 to 15 nt). A number of isolates have a mutation at the underlined upstream T (T→C), but this seems unlikely to affect the promoter structure. WS6 346 and OBY317 have a T deletion in the 8-T tract. At the LH end of the genome this promoter is in a noncoding sequence, but at the RH end it is within the 3′ end of M156R. (B) M057L late promoter. A TAAAT motif incorporates the ATG, a 4-nucleotide spacer, and then 8 Ts. OB1/406 has an extra T in the T tract, making 9 Ts. (C) M000.5L/R possible late promoter. The putative promoter structure is italicized. The 2 C residues are almost invariably A in late promoters. There is no upstream T-rich domain for 100 nt upstream. G-91 has a C→T mutation in the putative promoter structure, yielding TTCATG. There is no sign of an upstream A-rich region that could act as an early promoter. (D) M138L early promoter. SWH 8/2/93 has an extra A. The dash is in the poly(A) tract of the italicized potential promoter. (E) M153R early promoter. A potential early promoter sequence is italicized. All Australian isolates lack the upstream T (underlined). This seems unlikely to have any impact on the promoter. WS6 1071 and OB31120 lack an A in the homopolymer tract (boldface). A possible alternative promoter is underlined but seems too close to the ATG.

Pathways to attenuation and virulence in Australian isolates.

Overall, nine viruses derived from SLS and sequenced here have previously defined virulence phenotypes. The coding changes from SLS in these viruses are summarized in Table 6. Three attenuated viruses were sequenced from the 1990s, of which only the grade 5 Meby has a probable explanation for its attenuated phenotype. Strikingly, the grade 4 SWH/9/1992 is closely related to the grade 1 BRK. Excluding the disruption of the M036L ORF in BRK, only three coding differences exist to explain the attenuated phenotype of SWH: a P227S mutation at the C terminus of M004, a P33L mutation in M087 (mRNA capping enzyme; P at this position is conserved in most poxviruses), and a VP duplication in the M093 viral core protein. BRK has one unique mutation outside M036, A47V in M112, a Holliday junction resolvase. The A in this position is not conserved outside the leporipoxviruses. A similar analysis with the three grade 1 viruses sequenced revealed only two shared mutations for two viruses: Bendigo and Wellington both share I481V in M032 and Y302H in M099, the major core protein precursor. This suggests that attenuation and virulence mutations may be subtle or involve multiple epistatic effects.

Table 6.

Coding changes from SLS in viruses of defined virulence

Protein Function Change(s) for virusa:
Glenfield/1951 (1) KM13/1952 (3) Uriarra/1953 (5) Gung/1991 (4) Wellington/1991 (1) Meby/1991 (5) Bendigo/1992 (1) SWH/9/1992 (4) BRK/1993 (1)
M001 Chemokine binding S213N
M002 TNF inhibition/antiapoptosis A226V, T188A, Q117R A226V A226V A226V, Q117R A226V A226V
M003.1 PRR signal inhibition? A37V A37V A37V A37V, L76V A37V A37V
M004 Antiapoptosis N138K P227S
M005 Antiapoptosis G insert disrupts reading frame R434W, S209Y R434W, S209Y R434W, S209Y R434W, S209Y R434W, S209Y R434W, S209Y
M006 E3 Ub ligase? D171G
M009 E3 Ub ligase? A261V, T insert at 420 A261V, T insert at 420 P343L, T insert at 420, TGG→TGA at codon 348, A140T A261V A261V, T insert at 420 A261V, T insert at 420, TA insert at 968
M012 dUTP nucleotidohydrolase S129N
M014 E3 Ub ligase? C insert at 1406 C insert at 1406 C insert at 1406 V175I, G122W V175I, G122W V175I, G122W V175I, G122W V175I, G122W V175I, G122W
M015 Ribonucleotide reductase small subunit V85A V85A V85A V85A V85A V85A
M017 ?e E71K E71K E71K E71K E71K E71K
M021 VACV F12/EEV maturation D315N R328C, D315N R328C, D315N R328C, D315N R328C, D315N
M025 VACV F16? M11I M11I M11I M11I M11I
M027 Poly(A) pol catalytic subunit D143N D143N
M028 VACV E2 EV formation S244L S244L R33C S244L S244L S244L
M029 IFN resistance PKR inhibitor A17V A17V
M032 Virion protein? I481V I481V
M034 DNA pol H222Y
M036 VACV O1L/Leu zipper motif C270Y F293L C270Y C270Y P278S, C270Y C270Y C270Y 92 nt deleted, C270Y,b E125K
M040 DNA binding phosphoprotein/virion E 258 insert
M041 VACV I5 structural V49A
M043 VACV I7 core/cys proteinase? A299T A299T
M044 RNA helicase R606H S361L S361L V350A V350A
M045 Core enzyme, morphogenesis D263N D263N D263N D263N D263N D263N
M049 Core protein E21K T314A
M052 Fusion complex S29N S29N S29N D290G, S29N S29N S29N
M057 Core protein L90V L90V L90V L90V L90V L90V
M062 Host range K142T K142T K142T K142T K142T
M063 Host range S195C, H72 insert S195C S195C S195C S195C S195C
M064 Host range E163 insert
M065 Poly(A) pol regulatory subunit T98 M T98 M T98 M T98 M T98 M T98 M
M068 RNA pol subunit D1012G
M071 VACV H3L membrane protein E172K V113I V113I
M072 RNA pol-associated transcription factor I150T I150T I150T I150T I150T I150T I150T
M081 VETF-1c R234C
M083 Carbonic anhydrase homologue/structural protein C nt insert 513 restores ORF C nt insert 513 restores ORF C nt insert 513 restores ORF C nt insert 513 restores ORF C nt insert 513 restores ORF C nt insert 513 restores ORF
M084 VACV D9 S109L
M087 mRNA capping enzyme/VITFd P33L
M092 Major core protein M119I
M093 Core protein V92P93 insert
M099 Major core protein precursor Y302H Y302H
M106 Fusion complex M136I
M107 VACV A17 membrane protein A172T
M108 DNA helicase F18I P38S
M112 Holliday junction resolvase A47V
M114 RNA pol subunit A686V P1147H P1147H P1147H
M115 IMVg surface protein 66D67E deleted
M121 EV group CLECT family; NK evasion? S21F S21F S21F S21F S21F
M127 DNA photolyase A343T
M130 ? G nt 30 inserted ORF disrupted
M132 ? C133Y C133Y C133Y C133Y C133Y
M134 Membrane? EV? VARVf B22R K1970 insert K1970 insert A nt inserted at 5911, premature stop S84P, K1970 insert, R600K S84P, K1970 insert S84P, K1970 insert, E1763A S84P, K1970 insert S84P, K1970 insert S84P, K1970 insert
M137 VACV A51 A308T A201T
M138 Sialyltransferase M25L
M139 TLRh signal inhibition? R210S
M140 E3 Ub ligase? P76H P76H P76H P76H P76H P76H; T371A P76H P76H P76H
M141 OX-2 homologue S45 insert
M142 Ser/Thr-specific protein kinase Y183C
M144 VACV B5R orthologue D106G
M148 E3 Ub ligase? L383F R41Q, L383F L383F L383F L383F L383F
M150 NF-κB inhibition P173S P173S P173S P173S P173S P173S
M151 SERP 2 P140S, R173G R173G R173G P140S, R173G R173G R173G
M152 SERP 3 V106A R181H
M153 MHC downregulation G nt 329, deleted, ORF disrupted L204S L204S R40L, L204S V182-E183-E184 deleted, L204S nt 509–573 deleted L204S L204S L204S
M154 NF-κB inhibition? Y53C Y53C Y53C Y53C
M156 IFN resistance L98P
a

The year of isolation and virulence grade (in parentheses) are given.

b

BRK has the nucleotide mutation at this position, but the earlier 92-bp deletion in M036L means that the reading frame is disrupted here.

c

VETF-1, virus early transcription factor 1.

d

VITF, virus intermediate transcription factor.

e

?, unknown.

f

VARV, variola virus.

g

IMV, intracellular mature virion.

h

TLR, Toll-like receptor.

An example of the complexity of possible virulence determinants involves two genes that encode proteins that are functionally conserved in poxviruses and inhibit type 1 interferon responses: M029L, an orthologue of VACV E3L, and M156R, an orthologue of VACV K3L (Fig. 1). Eleven of the recent Australian isolates have an A17V mutation in M029L, the only one in this gene; based on a molecular clock dating analysis, this mutation was fixed between 1969 and 1975 (Fig. 1) and coincides with the introduction and spread of the European rabbit flea, which altered the epizootology of myxomatosis in temperate Australia. Interestingly, this mutated sequence has reverted to the original sequence twice on independent branches of the tree and in viruses isolated from widely separated geographic regions. M029 has been shown to function similarly to VACV E3, binding double-stranded RNA, inhibiting protein kinase R (PKR) activation, and inhibiting IFN-β, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression (45); it is a critical virulence factor in rabbit infections but also has a second function of binding RNA helicase A (RHA; DHX9), which promotes virus replication in some cell lines, so it has been described as a dual-function virulence and host range factor (46). The amino acid sequence from the related leporipoxvirus RFV is conserved from amino acid 1 to 8 and is identical to that from MYXV from amino acid 20 to 55 but is poorly conserved between residues 9 and 19; this region is also divergent in the Californian MSW strain of MYXV (47). If we consider the mutation and reversion in MYXV and the divergence in 3 leporipoxviruses with different natural hosts, then we find it possible that this region is involved in species specificity and host adaptation.

M156 is a homologue of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) and competes with eIF2α for phosphorylation by PKR (42). The L98P mutation in M156 is present in 13 of the modern isolates and most likely has appeared twice on independent branches of the tree (Fig. 1) (although a lack of bootstrap support at key nodes means that we cannot formally exclude a single origin of this mutation). Two of the viruses with this mutation, WS6/346 and OB3/Y317, which are phylogenetically distinct, possess an additional T deletion in a homopolymer at the 3′ end of M156R that allows read-through of the stop codon and the addition of EG at the C terminus of the protein. Based on its nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure, the 102-amino-acid M156 protein is predicted to be a 5-stranded antiparallel β barrel (42). The L98P mutation occurs in the β5 sheet, with the L side chain predicted to form part of the interior of the barrel, while it has been proposed that residues D97 and R99 are involved in binding PKR (42). Interestingly, M156R has been duplicated in the common ancestor of four of the viruses sequenced here, all of which have the L98P mutation. In VACV undergoing artificial selection, K3L has been shown to expand and reduce in copy numbers while acquiring adaptive mutations (48).

The virulent Lu CSL virus, released in Australia from the 1970s to the 1990s.

The Lu virus was widely released in Australia from the 1970s to the 1990s. However, our phylogenetic analysis, coupled with previous studies (25, 31, 49), demonstrates that Australian field isolates are derived from SLS and that, if Lu has left descendant viruses in Australia, they have not been sampled. The Lu virus sequenced here is from a vial supplied for release and has only a single difference from the originally published Lu sequence (12, 34): a C insert at nucleotide 142 in a homopolymer tract in M127L, causing a frameshift mutation. The mutation may have been present in a single plaque or pock used to produce the original seed virus for release (50).

DISCUSSION

MYXV evolution is characterized by a relatively high rate of nucleotide substitution, frequent changes of virulence, and a rapid spread in geographic space. This was exemplified by the initial mosquito-borne epizootic in 1950 to 1951, during which SLS spread across an area approximately 1,600 km south to north and 1,800 km east to west in 3 months (4). Indeed, our phylogeographic analysis clearly shows that viruses from geographically disjunct regions of Australia can still be remarkably closely related, indicative of frequent viral traffic. The success of MYXV and, subsequently, rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) as biological controls, combined with changes in land management, means that modern rabbit populations are likely to be less connected than in 1950 (51, 52). The key vectors for viral transmission are the mosquito, which is predominantly a spring to autumn vector and requires water for breeding, and rabbit fleas, Spilopsyllus cuniculi (in temperate Australia) and Xenopsylla cunicularis (in arid Australia), which were introduced into Australia in 1970 and 1994, respectively. Fleas provide the potential for local transmission year round, whereas mosquitoes are seasonal but have the potential for longer-distance spread. Virus may also be spread by dispersing migrating rabbits—predominantly juvenile males—that are either incubating the disease or immune and carrying fleas with the virus. In addition, large-scale rabbit migrations out of dry country during droughts may bring high numbers of susceptible animals into contact with virus, providing opportunities for spread. Accidental or deliberate translocation of infected rabbits could possibly also occur. Work in the Canberra district also suggests that viral spread is rapid, as shown by the multiple viral lineages that can cocirculate within a single community, with no apparent dominance of one lineage over any other. Such lineage cocirculation also tentatively suggests that these viruses do not differ greatly in long-term fitness despite their possible differences in virulence, although this will need to be confirmed with additional data. Indeed, in our analysis as a whole, there was no obvious signal for major fitness differences across multiple genotypes within a small geographic range.

The outcome of infection with MYXV depends on the interaction of multiple viral immune evasion and immunosuppression proteins and proteins and cells of the host innate and adaptive immune systems, together with the proteins required for virus replication, assembly, and infection. The emergence of slightly attenuated viruses during the early radiation in Australia and Europe means that mutations that enhanced transmission were selected because the infected rabbit survived longer than rabbits infected with grade 1 strains.

Most of these early (slightly) attenuated viruses still had case fatality rates of 90 to 99%, but with prolonged survival times compared to those for SLS and Lu (6, 9, 53). Experimentally, grade 4 viruses (case fatality rate of 50 to 70%; average survival times of 29 to 50 days) had the highest rates of mosquito transmission (10), but in field surveys from 1951 to 1981, these viruses were always less prevalent than grade 3 viruses (54). The rapid selection of rabbits with resistance to myxomatosis, which appears to operate through an enhanced innate immune response rather than resistance to infection (55, 56), is likely to have driven virus evolution toward increased virulence and hence to maintain transmissibility and competitiveness, and this may explain the preponderance of grade 3 viruses since all these virulence measurements were done in laboratory rabbits with no resistance. Viruses with a grade 1 phenotype in laboratory rabbits appear as grade 4 or 5 in wild rabbits with genetic resistance, while some such as BRK are found to be more virulent than the progenitor SLS when tested in wild rabbits (57, 58).

The pathway to virulence reversion and enhancement could involve reversal of attenuating mutations. For example, reversal of the indel in M083L has occurred in the common ancestor to all the modern isolates that we sequenced, while that in M014L was common to all three early viruses sequenced, although whether this is a reversal is not clear. Similarly, mutations could compensate for attenuating mutations, such as the disruption of M036L, which appears to be attenuating in Sussex but not in BRK, or mutations could increase virulence by new pathways. The duplication of virulence genes and the fragmentation of some reading frames also provide the raw material for further evolution of new functions, as has occurred, for example, in cowpox virus, where a gene fragment has evolved a new function in immunosuppression (59). While this might suggest that field isolates should now be of higher virulence for laboratory rabbits, the reality appears more nuanced, with grade 4 and 5 viruses present in our samples, indicating that many factors at the local level influence the effective virulence and successful transmission. In addition, the widespread establishment of the European rabbit flea in Australia, which was credited with enhancing the impact of myxomatosis by providing a year-round vector and increasing transmission, may have altered the selection pressures on both virus and rabbit.

The large and complex genome of MYXV has provided the plasticity for multiple routes to attenuation and multiple and complex routes back to virulence. The accumulation of mutations in more-recent virus isolates makes it difficult to identify single mutations that are critical for phenotype, whether virulent or attenuated. In particular, we have shown here that it is difficult to define possible roles for single amino acid changes or potentially even synonymous changes in this evolutionary process. Indeed, there has been remarkably little characterization of Australian field viruses in rabbits or even in cell culture since the 1980s. Importantly, characterization of the sequenced viruses in rabbits will provide opportunities for matching virulent and attenuated viruses that are phylogenetically closely related and for using reverse genetics to define these pathways.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded in part by grant R01 AI093804 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. E.C.H. is funded by an NHMRC Australia Fellowship. D.C.T. is funded by an ARC Future Fellowship.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 25 September 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fenner F, Fantini B. 1999. Biological control of vertebrate pests: the history of myxomatosis, an experiment in evolution. CAB International, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fenner F, Ratcliffe FN. 1965. Myxomatosis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rolls EC. 1969. They all ran wild. Angus and Robertson, Melbourne, Australia [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ratcliffe FN, Myers K, Fennessy BV, Calaby JH. 1952. Myxomatosis in Australia. A step towards the biological control of the rabbit. Nature 170:7–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moses A. 1911. O virus do myxoma dos coelhos. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 3:46–53 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marshall ID, Dyce AL, Poole WE, Fenner F. 1955. Studies in the epidemiogy of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. IV. Observations of disease behaviour in two localities near the northern limit of rabbit infestation in Australia, May 1952 to April 1953. J. Hyg. (Camb.) 53:12–25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marshall ID, Fenner F. 1960. Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. VII. The virulence of strains of myxoma virus recovered from Australian wild rabbits between 1951 and 1959. J. Hyg. (Camb.) 58:485–488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Myers K. 1954. Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. II. Field experiments, August-November 1950, and the first epizootic of myxomatosis in the Riverine Plain of south-eastern Australia. J. Hyg. (Camb.) 52:47–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fenner F, Marshall ID. 1957. A comparison of the virulence for European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of strains of myxoma virus recovered in the field in Australia, Europe and America. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 55:149–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fenner F, Day MF, Woodroofe GM. 1956. Epidemiological consequences of the mechanical transmission of myxomatosis by mosquitoes. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 54:284–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kerr PJ. 2012. Myxomatosis in Australia and Europe: a model for emerging infectious diseases. Antiviral Res. 93:387–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cameron C, Hota-Mitchell S, Chen L, Barrett J, Cao JX, Macaulay C, Willer D, Evans D, McFadden G. 1999. The complete DNA sequence of myxoma virus. Virology 264:298–318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kerr PJ, Ghedin E, Depasse JV, Fitch A, Cattadori IM, Hudson PJ, Tscharke DC, Read AF, Holmes EC. 2012. Evolutionary history and attenuation of myxoma virus on two continents. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002950. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zerbino DR, McEwen GK, Margulies EH, Birney E. 2009. Pebble and rock band: heuristic resolution of repeats and scaffolding in the velvet short-read de novo assembler. PLoS One 4:e8407. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Assefa S, Keane TM, Otto TD, Newbold C, Berriman M. 2009. ABACAS: algorithm-based automatic contiguation of assembled sequences. Bioinformatics 25:1968–1969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Otto TD, Dillon GP, Degrave WS, Berriman M. 2011. RATT: rapid annotation transfer tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:e57. 10.1093/nar/gkq1268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, Parkhill J. 2005. ACT: the Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics 21:3422–3423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), 4 ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H. 2009. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol. Biol. 537:39–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Page RDM, Holmes EC. 1998. Molecular evolution: a phylogenetic approach. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, Moulton V, Posada D, Lefeuvre P. 2010. RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26:2462–2463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kerr PJ, Hone J, Perrin L, French N, Williams CK. 2010. Molecular and serological analysis of the epidemiology of myxoma virus in rabbits. Vet. Microbiol. 143:167–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Williams CK, Davey CC, Moore RJ, Hinds LA, Silvers LE, Kerr PJ, French N, Hood GM, Pech RP, Krebbs CJ. 2007. Populations responses to sterility imposed on female European rabbits. J. Appl. Ecol. 44:291–301 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kerr PJ, Jackson RJ, Robinson AJ, Swan J, Silvers L, French N, Clarke H, Hall DF, Holland MK. 1999. Infertility in female rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) alloimmunized with the rabbit zona pellucida protein ZPB either as a purified recombinant protein or expressed by recombinant myxoma virus. Biol. Reprod. 61:606–613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang L, Villa NY, McFadden G. 2009. Interplay between poxviruses and the cellular ubiquitin/ubiquitin-like pathways. FEBS Lett. 583:607–614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Russell RJ, Robbins SJ. 1989. Cloning and molecular characterization of the myxoma virus genome. Virology 170:147–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marshall ID. 1959. The influence of ambient temperature on the course of myxomatosis in rabbits. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 57:484–497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saint KM, French N, Kerr P. 2001. Genetic variation in Australian isolates of myxoma virus: an evolutionary and epidemiological study. Arch. Virol. 146:1105–1123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alcami A, Smith GL. 1996. A mechanism of the inhibition of fever by a virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:11029–11034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Esposito JJ, Sammons SA, Frace AM, Osborne JD, Olsen-Rasmussen M, Zhang M, Govil D, Damon IK, Kline R, Laker M, Li Y, Smith GL, Meyer H, LeDuc JW, Wohlhueter RM. 2006. Genome sequence diversity and clues to the evolution of Variola (smallpox) virus. Science 313:807–812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Morales M, Ramirez MA, Cano MJ, Parraga M, Castilla J, Perez-Ordoyo LI, Torres JM, Barcena J. 2009. Genome comparison of a nonpathogenic myxoma virus field strain with its ancestor, the virulent Lausanne strain. J. Virol. 83:2397–2403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Collin N, Guerin JL, Drexler I, Blanie S, Gelfi J, Boullier S, Foucras G, Sutter G, Messud-Petit F. 2005. The poxviral scrapin MV-LAP requires a myxoma viral infection context to efficiently downregulate MHC-I molecules. Virology 343:171–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guerin JL, Gelfi J, Boullier S, Delverdier M, Bellanger FA, Bertagnoli S, Drexler I, Sutter G, Messud-Petit F. 2002. Myxoma virus leukemia-associated protein is responsible for major histocompatibility complex class I and Fas-CD95 down-regulation and defines scrapins, a new group of surface cellular receptor abductor proteins. J. Virol. 76:2912–2923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mansouri M, Bartee E, Gouveia K, Hovey Nerenberg BT, Barrett J, Thomas L, Thomas G, McFadden G, Früh K. 2003. The PHD/LAP-domain protein M153R of myxoma virus is a ubiquitin ligase that induces the rapid internalization and lysosomal destruction of CD4. J. Virol. 77:1427–1440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Macen JL, Upton C, Nation N, McFadden G. 1993. SERP1, a serine proteinase inhibitor encoded by myxoma virus, is a secreted glycoprotein that interferes with inflammation. Virology 195:348–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mossman K, Lee SF, Barry M, Boshkov L, McFadden G. 1996. Disruption of M-T5, a novel myxoma virus gene member of poxvirus host range superfamily, results in dramatic attenuation of myxomatosis in infected European rabbits. J. Virol. 70:4394–4410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Upton C, Macen JL, Maranchuk RA, DeLange AM, McFadden G. 1988. Tumorigenic poxviruses: fine analysis of the recombination junctions in malignant rabbit fibroma virus, a recombinant between Shope fibroma virus and myxoma virus. Virology 166:229–239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Camus-Bouclainville C, Gretillat M, Py R, Gelfi J, Guerin JL, Bertagnoli S. 2011. Genome sequence of SG33 strain and recombination between wild-type and vaccine myxoma viruses. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:633–638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ramelot TA, Cort JR, Yee AA, Liu F, Goshe MB, Edwards AM, Smith RD, Arrowsmith CH, Dever TE, Kennedy MA. 2002. Myxoma virus immunomodulatory protein M156R is a structural mimic of eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF2alpha. J. Mol. Biol. 322:943–954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gedey R, Jin X-L, Hinthong O, Shisler JL. 2006. Poxviral regulation of the host-NF-kB response: the vaccinia virus M2L protein inhibits induction of NF-kB activation via an ERK2 pathway in virus-infected human embryonic kidney cells. J. Virol. 80:8676–8685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Willer DO, McFadden G, Evans DH. 1999. The complete genome sequence of Shope (rabbit) fibroma virus. Virology 264:319–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Myskiw C, Arsenio J, Hammett C, van Bruggen R, Deschambault Y, Beausoleil N, Babiuk S, Cao J. 2011. Comparative analysis of poxvirus orthologues of the vaccinia virus E3 protein: modulation of protein kinase R activity, cytokine responses, and virus pathogenicity. J. Virol. 85:12280–12291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rahman MM, Liu J, Chan WM, Rothenburg S, McFadden G. 2013. Myxoma virus protein M029 is a dual function immunomodulator that inhibits PKR and also conscripts RHA/DHX9 to promote expanded host tropism and viral replication. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003465. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kerr PJ, Rogers MB, Fitch A, Depasse JV, Cattadori IM, Hudson PJ, Tscharke DC, Holmes EC, Ghedin E. 28 August 2013. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the Californian MSW strain of myxoma virus reveals potential host adaptations. J. Virol. 10.1128/JVI.01923-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Elde NC, Child SJ, Eickbush MT, Kitzman JO, Rogers KS, Shendure J, Geballe AP, Malik HS. 2012. Poxviruses deploy genomic accordions to adapt rapidly against host antiviral defenses. Cell 150:831–841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Berman D, Kerr PJ, Stagg R, van Leeuwen BH, Gonzalez T. 2006. Should the 40-year-old practice of releasing virulent myxoma virus to control rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) be continued? Wildl. Res. 33:549–556 [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Parer I, Sobey WR, Conolly D, Morton R. 1994. Virulence of strains of myxoma virus and the resistance of wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.), from different locations in Australasia. Aust. J. Zool. 42:347–362 [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fuller SJ, Mather PB, Wilson JC. 1996. Limited genetic differentiation among wild Oryctolagus cuniculus L. (rabbit) populations in arid eastern Australia. Heredity 77(Pt 2):138–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fuller SJ, Wilson JC, Mather PB. 1997. Patterns of differentiation among wild rabbit populations Oryctolagus cuniculus L. in arid and semiarid ecosystems of north-eastern Australia. Mol. Ecol. 6:145–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Myers K, Marshall ID, Fenner F. 1954. Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. III. Observations on two succeeding epizootics in Australian wild rabbits on the Riverine plain of south-eastern Australia. J. Hyg. (Camb.) 52:337–360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fenner F. 1983. The Florey lecture, 1983. Biological control, as exemplified by smallpox eradication and myxomatosis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 218:259–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Best SM, Kerr PJ. 2000. Coevolution of host and virus: the pathogenesis of virulent and attenuated strains of myxoma virus in resistant and susceptible European rabbits. Virology 267:36–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kerr P, McFadden G. 2002. Immune responses to myxoma virus. Viral Immunol. 15:229–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kerr PJ, Merchant JC, Silvers L, Hood GM, Robinson AJ. 2003. Monitoring the spread of myxoma virus in rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus populations on the southern tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. II. Selection of a strain of virus for release. Epidemiol. Infect. 130:123–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kerr PJ, Perkins HD, Inglis B, Stagg R, McLaughlin E, Collins SV, Van Leeuwen BH. 2004. Expression of rabbit IL-4 by recombinant myxoma viruses enhances virulence and overcomes genetic resistance to myxomatosis. Virology 324:117–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Alzhanova D, Edwards DM, Hammarlund E, Scholz IG, Horst D, Wagner MJ, Upton C, Wiertz EJ, Slifka MK, Fruh K. 2009. Cowpox virus inhibits the transporter associated with antigen processing to evade T cell recognition. Cell Host Microbe 6:433–445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schweneker M, Lukassen S, Späth M, Wolferstätter M, Babel E, Brinkmann K, Wielert U, Chaplin P, Suter M, Hausmann J. 2012. The vaccinia virus O1 protein is required for sustained activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and promotes viral virulence. J. Virol. 86:2323–2336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES