Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1979 Jul;76(7):3430–3434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3430

Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila

Richard W Siegel *, Jeffrey C Hall
PMCID: PMC383839  PMID: 16592682

Abstract

Male courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster is modified by prior sexual experience. Whereas naive males nearly always court virgin females persistently, males previously paired with unreceptive fertilized females subsequently court virgin females in an abbreviated manner, if at all. The probability of diminished male courtship is directly related to the duration of the prior “conditioning” period with a fertilized female. Naive males court fertilized females less vigorously than they court virgins; this depression of male behavior occurs even if the male is blind or if the fertilized female cannot actively reject his courtship. These results suggest that fertilized females are a source of both courtship-provoking and courtship-inhibiting olfactory cues and that the central association of these cues in males is sufficient to bring about the retention of modified courtship behavior. Mutant “amnesiac” males, selected as memory-deficient in a learning test unrelated to courtship [Quinn, W. G., Sziber, P. P. & Booker, R. (1979) Nature (London) 277, 212-214], are trainable by exposure to fertilized females, but the experience-dependent behavior—diminished courtship performance—wanes abnormally rapidly—i.e., less than 1 hour, compared to 2-3 hr for wild-type flies.

Keywords: reproductive behavior, learning and memory, behavior genetics

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Averhoff W. W., Richardson R. H. Pheromonal control of mating patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1974 Sep;4(3):207–225. doi: 10.1007/BF01074155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown R. G. Courtship behaviour in the Drosophila obscura group. II. Comparative studies. Behaviour. 1965;25(3):281–323. doi: 10.1163/156853965x00174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudai Y., Jan Y. N., Byers D., Quinn W. G., Benzer S. dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 May;73(5):1684–1688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grigliatti T. A., Hall L., Rosenbluth R., Suzuki D. T. Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. XIV. A selection of immobile adults. Mol Gen Genet. 1973 Jan 24;120(2):107–114. doi: 10.1007/BF00267238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall J. C. Courtship among males due to a male-sterile mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1978 Mar;8(2):125–141. doi: 10.1007/BF01066870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hotta Y., Benzer S. Courtship in Drosophila mosaics: sex-specific foci for sequential action patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):4154–4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.4154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Hara E., Pruzan A., Ehrman L. Ethological isolation and mating experience in Drosophila paulistorum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):975–976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pak W. L., Grossfield J., White N. V. Nonphototactic mutants in a study of vision of Drosophila. Nature. 1969 Apr 26;222(5191):351–354. doi: 10.1038/222351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pruzan A., Applewhite P. B., Bucci M. J. Protein synthesis inhibition alters Drosophila mating behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1977 Mar;6(3):355–357. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(77)90037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Quinn W. G., Harris W. A., Benzer S. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):708–712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.3.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Quinn W. G., Sziber P. P., Booker R. The Drosophila memory mutant amnesiac. Nature. 1979 Jan 18;277(5693):212–214. doi: 10.1038/277212a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shorey H. H., Bartell R. J. Role of a volatile female sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav. 1970 Feb;18(1):159–164. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(70)90085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spatz H. C., Emanns A., Reichert H. Associative learning of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1974 Mar 22;248(446):359–361. doi: 10.1038/248359a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Spieth H. T. Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu Rev Entomol. 1974;19:385–405. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.19.010174.002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES