Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences logoLink to Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
. 2013 Dec;38(4):286–292.

Skeletal Involvement of Brucella melitensis in Children: A Systematic Review

Anahita Sanaei Dashti 1, Abdollah Karimi 2
PMCID: PMC3838979  PMID: 24293781

Abstract

Brucellosis is a protean disease and should be excluded in any febrile child with a constellation of symptoms such as fever, malaise, sweating, arthralgia, and joint swelling in endemic areas. Skeletal system involvement is the most common source of complaints in brucellosis. The frequency of skeletal involvement in children is 6.4% to 73.5%. There are some controversies regarding the most common sites of involvement: sacroiliac versus peripheral joints. In the vast majority of cases, peripheral joint involvement in pediatric brucellosis has a monoarticular pattern, although there is no agreement about the most commonly involved peripheral joint. In this systematic review, published articles that describe the bone involvement of Brucella melitensis, as the most prevalent kind of the microorganism in the region, in children are evaluated.

Key Words: Brucellosis, Systematic review, Skeletal involvement, Arthritis, Sacroiliitis, Spondylitis, Brucella melitensis

Introduction

Brucellosis, previously known as Malta fever, is one of the most common zoonotic diseases. Owing to its subtle nature, difficult diagnosis, tendency to relapse, and potentially debilitating complications, brucellosis is a major health problem in the world. Annually, more than half a million people are infected globally. This erratic illness was noted in the Mediterranean region by Hippocrates in 450 B.C. and was described by the Romans 2000 years ago.

Brucellosis is endemic in Iran. However, according to the data reported by the National Commission on Communicable Diseases Control, the incidence of brucellosis is in decline in Iran. In 1989, the annual incidence surpassed 1000 cases per million;1 and in 2003, the annual incidence plummeted to 238.6 cases per million.2 Be that as it may, it seems that human brucellosis is still a significant burden in Iran.3

Brucellosis is caused by organisms belonging to the genus Brucella, which is an aerobic and non-motile Gram-negative intracellular bacterium that does not produce spores. This genus comprises seven species based on antigenic and host differences: B. melitensis (sheep and goats); B. abortus (cattle); B. suis (pigs); B. ovis (sheep); B. canis (dogs); B. neotomae (rats); and B. maris (marine mammals).

Brucellosis is a febrile illness with a few vague systemic complaints, placing it in the differential diagnosis of many feverish diseases. Bone and joint involvements including arthritis, spondylitis, and osteomyelitis, are the most common complications of brucellosis. Kennedy made the first report of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in 1904, almost 20 years after the discovery of the Malta fever bacterium by Sir David Bruce.4 There are several published reports of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis from different regions; nonetheless, a consensus has yet to emerge as to the prevalence, location, and type of involvement in children.

The purpose of the present study was to review and summarize the reports of the skeletal system involvement of B. melitensis in children.

Methodology

Inclusion Criteria

Reviewed studies were of the observational type, exclusively in the age group of children, or studies that compared children and adults. As another requirement, the diagnosis of brucellosis had to be based on the presence of relevant clinical complaints associated with positive blood or bone marrow cultures or serology (positive Wright test result of 1/160 or more). Due to the high virulence of B. melitensis, its tendency to produce skeletal complications, and its prevalence in the Middle East region, we restricted the review to articles that considered B. melitensis as their sole or most frequent etiologic agent.

Search Engines

To find the eligible articles, we employed the search engines of Google Scholar, PubMed, and Cochrane database. The following journal sites were also directly investigated:

(1) International Journal of Infectious Diseases

(2) Lancet: The Infectious Diseases Collection

(3) The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

(4) Clinical Infectious Diseases Journal

Keywords

Search was done via the keywords of brucellosis, melitensis, children, arthritis, osteomyelitis, spondylitis, skeletal manifestations, and sacroiliitis in English and Persian. Search was performed on two separate occasions by two separate researchers from January 2009 until March 2012 on data that were published after 1980 (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The Moose flowchart for article screening

Results

Prevalence of Skeletal Complications

Prevalence of the skeletal complications of brucellosis in the published articles varied from 11 to 85%.4-7 The reported prevalence was influenced by factors such as brucella species, differences in hosts and populations, environmental factors, patient’s age, disease duration, and differences in the diagnostic methods and criteria.4,6 Complaints arising from the skeletal system were the main reason for seeking medical attention in children.8 In the Gür5 study on distinct groups of adults and children, the skeletal complications of brucellosis were more frequent in the children than in the adults (table 1).

Table 1.

Frequency of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in children and adults (in percentages

Investigator Children Adults
Gotuzzo9 13.6 26.7
Al Shamahy10 6.4 19.7
Gür5 73.5 68.5

Location and Character of Skeletal Involvement

It seems that the most prevalent location of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in adults is the sacroiliac joint.6,11 However, some researchers believe that in brucellosis, peripheral joint involvement is more common than is sacroiliitis.9,12,13 There was no agreement between four studies that exclusively appraised the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in children with respect to the most frequent site of the involvement of the disease (tables 2 and 3). According to the studies of Gür5 and Geyik6 in children, sacroiliac and peripheral joints were equally affected in brucellosis, whereas Al-Eissa4 and Gómez12 reported that the involvement of peripheral joints was more common than that of the sacroiliac joint in children.

Table 2.

Frequency of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in children according to different studies (reported in percentages

Investigator Number of patients with brucellosis Frequency of skeletal involvement
Gómez–Reino12 36 30
Gür 5 53 73.5
Shaalan10 115 75
Almuneef14 62 19
Al–Eissa4 102 38
Mousa15 30 37.4
Gotuzzo9 22 13.6
Mantur16 93 38.7
Roushan17 35 37
Zamani18 96 25
Galanakis19 52 60

Table 3.

Comparison of the sites of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis between children and adults

Investigator Type of involvement
Sacroiliitis Peripheral
arthritis
Spondylitis Osteomyelitis Periarticular swelling
Gür 5 Children 50 50 17 0 5
Adults 62.2 56.5 24.5 8 4
Geyik6 Children 48.7 48 17.9 0 5.12
Adults 62.2 56.5 24.5 24.5 4.09
Al-Eissa4 Children 8 93 0 5 NR
Gomez12 Children 4.8 95.2 0 0 NR

NR: Not reported

Involvement of Peripheral Joints

Both types of direct joint involvement (septic arthritis) and reactive arthritis may occur in brucellosis. Peripheral joint involvement, including knee, hip, ankle, shoulder, wrist, and elbow as well as even sternoclavicular joints, has been reported in brucellosis. Involvement of the small joints of hands and feet is rare. However, Shen20 reported the involvement of the proximal interphalangeal joints. Overall, probably the most common form of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in children is peripheral arthritis. Arthritis can be acute (3 months), sub-acute (3 to 12 months), or chronic (more than 12 months).

As is shown in table 4, and according to various studies, peripheral joint involvement in children with brucellosis ranges from 13.6% to 50%.

Table 4.

Frequency of peripheral arthritis in children suffering from brucellosis

Investigator Number of cases Location Arthritis (per cent) Monoarticular
type (per cent)
Shen20 20 Texas 50 80
Feiz21 95 Iran 19 often
Sahrda22 200 Kuwait 30 69
Mantur16 93 India 38.7 81
Al-Eissa4 102 Saudi Arabia 36 71
Al-Shamhy23 47 Yemen 6.4 NR
Shaalan10 115 Saudi Arabia 71 90
Gotuzzo9 22 Peru 13.6 75
Roushan17 111 Iran 31.5 82.8
Benjamin24 157 Saudi Arabia 50 67
Zamani18 96 Iran 25 62.5
Galanakis19 52 Greece 60 45

NR: Not reported

According to the Al-Eissa’s4 study on 40 children suffering from Brucella arthritis, pain, soft tissue swelling on the joint, limitation of motion, and warmth were almost always present and, occasionally, some degrees of erythema or joint effusion were observed. This fact was confirmed in other studies carried out on children.8,12,20,5 Interestingly, 36 out of the 40 studied children with Brucella arthritis had arthralgias in joints without arthritis. In a study on children by Gómez,12 50% of the patients with Brucella arthritis had arthralgias in joints without arthritis. Arthralgias presented as intermittent or migratory pain in small or large joints (or both) with no movement restriction.4

There is no consensus about the most commonly involved peripheral joint in pediatric brucellosis (table 5). While some studies cited the hip and some the knee, Gomez12 reported the ankle as the most frequently involved peripheral joint. In the vast majority of the cases, peripheral joint involvement in pediatric brucellosis had a monoarticular pattern. Al-Eissa4 reported that two thirds of the joints studied were affected as the monoarticular and the remaining as the pauciarticular type. In the pauciarticular type of arthritis, involvement was more additive than migratory. Also, in studies by Geylik,6 Mantur,16 and Shen20 on children, between 80 to 90% of the joint involvements in brucellosis were of the monoarticular type.

Table 5.

Most common sites of the involvement of peripheral arthritis in children with brucellosis

Investigator Involved joints
Al-Eissa4 Hip<knee<other joints
Geyik6 Hip<knee<ankle<other joints
Mantur16 Hp<knee
Gomez12 Ankle<hip<knee
Shaalan10 Hipknee<ankle
Lubani25 Hipknee
Roushan17 Hipknee
Shen20 Knee<sacroiliac<hip
Zamani18 Knee<hip<ankle
Galanakis19 Hip<knee<ankle

Sacroiliitis

Sacroiliitis is commonly the dominant form of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in adults and seems to be the most common form of skeletal involvement in the countries where B. melitensis is common.6,8 It is frequently reported from the Mediterranean and the Middle East regions, possibly due to a higher incidence of B. melitensis in these areas.7

The reported overall prevalence of sacroiliitis is controversial. In adults, the prevalence rates of zero (Al-Rawi26 [1989, Iraq, 17 patients]), 26% (Khateeb11 [1990, Kuwait]), and 45% (Colmenero,27 [1991]) have been reported.

Sacroiliitis in its acute form generally produces severe pain and limitation of movement (standing/walking). Pain is usually felt as a vague discomfort in the lower back and buttocks. When the pain is not too severe, the patient is comfortable in the prone position, although the pain is felt when the patient turns from side to side, walks, or stands. In this instance, the patient’s problem may be confused with acute disc herniation or acute femoral fracture.4

Rajapakse7 argued that if the patient could slowly rotate his/her hip, it would be clinical evidence of the lack of involvement of the hip. If a moderate pressure on the sacrum of a patient lying in the prone position produces pain in the sacroiliac area, there is probably a pathology in that area. In such a case, a mild percussion on the heels of the patient lying in the supine position with extended hips may illicit pain in the sacroiliac region.21 Young8 highlighted the rarity of sacroiliac involvement in children. Geyik6 compared 39 children with 122 adults in terms of the skeletal involvement of brucellosis. According to the results, sacroiliitis constituted about 48.7% of all the skeletal involvement of brucellosis in the children compared to 62.2% in the adults. Sacroiliitis was unilateral in 84% of the pediatric cases and bilateral in the remaining. Bilateral sacroiliitis was generally significantly less frequent in the adults. Contrary to the high rate of sacroiliac involvement in the Geyik’s6 investigation, Al-Eissa4 reported sacroiliitis in 8% of the pediatric study population (n=40) with the skeletal involvement of brucellosis. This number was 5.5% in the Roushan17 study (table 6).

Table 6.

Frequency of sacroiliac involvement (percentage of all skeletal involvement

Investigator Sacroiliitis
Roushan17 5.5
Al-Eissa4 8
Geyik6 48.7
Gomez12 4.8

Spondylitis

Spondylitis possesses an insidious nature and produces mild pain despite the presence of obvious radiological signs.28 There is local tenderness or limitation of motion, or both. With an increase in the severity and extent of the disease, difficulty in walking and symptoms of pressure on the spinal cord may be reported on physical examination. The lumbar region is the most common site of involvement. Sometimes para-spinal abscesses also occur, though with a smaller size than that of tuberculous abscesses. An incidence rate of even up to 16% for these abscesses in brucellosis has been reported.

Spondylolisthesis, paraplegia, and sphincter malfunction as a result of brucellosis have been reported. Unlike sacroiliac involvement, spinal involvement in brucellosis is often associated with graphic signs. Most of the time, brucellosis involves the anterior superior vertebral endplate, resulting in the epiphysitis of the anterior superior angle. Al-Eissa4 observed no case of brucellosis spondylitis in 40 children with skeletal complications. In a research by Geyik,6 17.94% of the children and 24.59% of the adults suffering from the skeletal complications of brucellosis had spondylitis. In both age groups, the most common sites of involvement were the lumbar, dorsal, and cervical areas, respectively. In another study by Gür,5 very similar figures were obtained: 17% of the children and 24% of the adults with skeletal complications of brucellosis had spondylitis.

Some clinical and paraclinical findings of children and adults with brucellosis are compared in tables 7 and 8.

Table 7.

Comparison of the frequency of paraclinical findings (reported in percentages) between children and adults with skeletal involvement of brucellosis

Findings Khateeb M (Adults) 11 Al-Eissa (Children) 4
Anemia 13 40
Leukopenia 11 35
Lymphocytosis 40 NR
Leukocytosis 19 0
Neutrophilia 15 0
Neutropenia NR 38
Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 39 (ESR>50) 43 (ESR>40)
Positive C-reactive protein 55 33
Positive antinuclear antibody NR 25
Positive rheumatoid factor 3 21
Elevated liver enzymes 30 40
Thrombocytopenia 3 NR
Positive blood culture 22 75

NR: Not reported

Table 8.

Comparison of the frequency of clinical findings (reported in percentages) between children and adults with skeletal involvement of brucellosis

Complaint Khateeb M (Adults) 11 Al-Eissa (Children) 4
Arthralgia 100 90
Fever 93 93
Prostration 88 15
Low back pain 69 20
Myalgia 48 60
Anorexia 46 45
Weight loss 16 50
Splenomegaly (isolated) 21 25
Hepatomegaly (isolated) 6 20
Lymphadenopathy NR 20

NR: Not reported

Limitations

Paucity of articles on the skeletal involvement of B. melitensis in children is the most important limitation of this review.

Conclusion

Brucellosis is a protean disease and is reported to involve various areas of the skeletal system. Nevertheless, clarification of all the aspects of this issue in children requires a thorough and precise observation and documentation of the relevant data in the future.

Conflict of Interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Global cases of brucellosis in 2003 [Internet] World Organization for Animal Health. Handi status II: zoonoses (human cases) Available from: http://www.oie.int/hs2/report.asp.
  • 2.A perspective of brucellosis surveillance in North Africa and Middle East [Internet] Regional Animal Disease Surveillance and Control Network, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FaoInfo/Agricult/AGA/AGAH/ID.
  • 3.Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:91–9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6. PubMed PMID: 16439329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Al-Eissa YA, Kambal AM, Alrabeeah AA, Abdullah AM, al-Jurayyan NA, al-Jishi NM. Osteoarticular brucellosis in children. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990;49:896–900. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.11.896. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.11.896. PubMed PMID: 2256735; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1004258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gür A, Geyik MF, Dikici B, Nas K, Cevik R, Sarac J, et al. Complications of brucellosis in different age groups: a study of 283 cases in southeastern Anatolia of Turkey. Yonsei Med J. 2003;44:33–44. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.1.33. PubMed PMID: 12619173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Geyik MF, Gür A, Nas K, Cevik R, Saraç J, Dikici B, et al. Musculoskeletal involvement of brucellosis in different age groups: a study of 195 cases. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132:98–105. doi: 10.57187/smw.2002.09900. PubMed PMID: 11971204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rajapakse CN. Bacterial infections: osteoarticular brucellosis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995;9:161–77. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80153-0. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3579(05)80153-0. PubMed PMID: 7728879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Young EJ. Brucella Species (Brucellosis) In: Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG, editors. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2012. pp. 861–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gotuzzo E, Seas C, Guerra JG, Carrillo C, Bocanegra TS, Calvo A, et al. Brucellar arthritis: a study of 39 Peruvian families. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987;46:506–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.7.506. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.7.506. PubMed PMID: 3662637; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1002183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shaalan MA, Memish ZA, Mahmoud SA, Alomari A, Khan MY, Almuneef M, et al. Brucellosis in children: clinical observations in 115 cases. Int J Infect Dis. 2002;6:182–6. doi: 10.1016/s1201-9712(02)90108-6. doi: 10.1016/S1201-9712(02)90108-6. PubMed PMID: 12718832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khateeb MI, Araj GF, Majeed SA, Lulu AR. Brucella arthritis: a study of 96 cases in Kuwait. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990;49:994–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.12.994. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.12.994. PubMed PMID: 2270973; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1004295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gómez-Reino FJ, Mateo I, Fuertes A, Gómez-Reino JJ. Brucellar arthritis in children and its successful treatment with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) Ann Rheum Dis. 1986;45:256–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.3.256. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.3.256. PubMed PMID: 3485409; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1001860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bocanegra TS, Gotuzzo E, Castañeda O, Alarcón GS, Espinoza LR. Rheumatic manifestations of brucellosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986;45:526. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.6.526–a. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.6.526-a. PubMed PMID: 3488037; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1001929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Almuneef M, Memish ZA, Al Shaalan M, Al Banyan E, Al-Alola S, Balkhy HH. Brucella melitensis bacteremia in children: review of 62 cases. J Chemother. 2003;15:76–80. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.1.76. PubMed PMID: 12678419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mousa AR, Muhtaseb SA, Almudallal DS, Khodeir SM, Marafie AA. Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis: a study of 169 cases. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:531–43. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.3.531. PubMed PMID: 3496650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mantur BG, Akki AS, Mangalgi SS, Patil SV, Gobbur RH, Peerapur BV. Childhood brucellosis--a microbiological, epidemiological and clinical study. J Trop Pediatr. 2004;50:153–7. doi: 10.1093/tropej/50.3.153. PubMed PMID: 15233191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roushan MR, Ahmadi SA, Gangi SM, Janmohammadi N, Amiri MJ. Childhood brucellosis in Babol, Iran. Trop Doct. 2005;35:229–31. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938693. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938693. PubMed PMID: 16354479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zamani A, Kooraki S, Mohazab RA, Zamani N, Matloob R, Hayatbakhsh MR, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of Brucella arthritis in 24 children. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31:270–3. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.81543. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.81543. PubMed PMID: 21623056; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3119967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Galanakis E, Bourantas KL, Leveidiotou S, Lapatsanis PD. Childhood brucellosis in north-western Greece: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 1996;155:1–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02115616. doi: 10.1007/BF02115616. PubMed PMID: 8750800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen MW. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of childhood brucellosis in a nonendemic country. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1178–83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1874. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1874. PubMed PMID: 18450861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Feiz J, Sabbaghian H, Miralai M. Brucellosis due to B melitensis in children. Clinical and epidemiologic observations on 95 patients studied in central Iran. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1978;17:904–7. doi: 10.1177/000992287801701210. doi: 10.1177/000992287801701210. PubMed PMID: 719990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sharda DC, Lubani M. A study of brucellosis in childhood. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1986;25:492–5. doi: 10.1177/000992288602501002. doi: 10.1177/000992288602501002. PubMed PMID: 3757394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Al-Shamahy HA, Wright SG. A study of 235 cases of human brucellosis in Sana’a, Republic of Yemen. East Mediterr Health J. 2001;7:238–46. PubMed PMID: 12596975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Benjamin B, Annobil SH, Khan MR. Osteoarticular complications of childhood brucellosis: a study of 57 cases in Saudi Arabia. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:801–5. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199211000-00019. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199211000-00019. PubMed PMID: 1452754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lubani M, Sharda D, Helin I. Brucella arthritis in children. Infection. 1986;14:233–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01644269. doi: 10.1007/BF01644269. PubMed PMID: 3793238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Al-Rawi TI, Thewaini AJ, Shawket AR, Ahmed GM. Skeletal brucellosis in Iraqi patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48:77–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.1.77. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.1.77. PubMed PMID: 2493773; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1003680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Fernández-Nebro A, Cabrera-Franquelo F. Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:23–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.50.1.23. doi: 10.1136/ard.50.1.23. PubMed PMID: 1994863; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1004319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pascual E. Brucellar arthritis. In: Madison PJ, Isenberg DA, editors. Oxford Textbook of Rheumatology. Oxford : Oxford University Press; 1993. pp. 581–9. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES