Skip to main content
International Journal of Stem Cells logoLink to International Journal of Stem Cells
. 2012 Nov;5(2):125–129. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2012.5.2.125

SIRT1 Inhibits p53 but not NF-κB Transcriptional Activity during Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells into Embryoid Bodies

Sang Jae Lhee 1,2,*, Eun-Kyung Song 1,*, Yu-Ri Kim 1, Myung-Kwan Han 1,#
PMCID: PMC3840997  PMID: 24298365

Abstract

Background and Objectives

SIRT1, a histone diacetylase, modify transactivation function of various transcription factor including p53 and NF-κB. p53 and NF-κB is involved in in vitro differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) into mouse embryoid body (mEB). These suggest that SIRT1 might affect in vitro differentiation of mESC into mEB by regulation of p53 and NF-κB.

Methods and Results

In this study we analyzed the effect of SIRT1 in in vitro differentiation of mESC into mEB using wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC. To examine SIRT1-specific gene in mESC, this study conducted microarray-based differential gene expression analysis between wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC. Comparing their gene expression patterns, this study determined a list of genes regulated by SIRT1. cDNA microarray data-set analysis revealed that genes associated with transcription and signal transduction are significantly modified in SIRT1 knockout mESC. cDNA microarray data-set analysis between mESC and EB in wild and SIRT1 showed that SIRT1 inhibits p53 signaling pathway but not affect NF-κB signaling pathway.

Conclusions

This study suggests that SIRT1 modify mESC differentiation by regulation of p53 transcriptional activity.

Keywords: SIRT1, Embryonic stem cells, p53, NF-κB, Embryoid bodies

Introduction

SIRT1 is an enzyme that catalyzes deacetylation of acetyl-lysine residues of proteins such as histone, p53 and NF-κB, and plays a role in stress resistance, metabolism, differentiation, and aging (1). SIRT1 extends the life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster (2-4), and may regulate life span in mammals (5). Also, SIRT1 regulates the activity of several important transcription factors, including FOXO1, FOXO3a, and FOXO4 (6-10), HES-1 and HEY-2 (11), MyoD (12), CTIP2 (13), PPARγ (14), NF-κB (15), and PGC1α (16).

It has been known that SIRT1 negatively regulates p53 and NF-κB. SIRT1 physically interacts with p53 and inhibits its function through p53 deacetylation at its C-terminal Lys379 (mouse protein) or Lys382 (human protein) residue (3, 4). SIRT1 overexpression represses p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage and oxidative stress whereas expression of a point mutant form of SIRT1 that disrupts its deacetyalase activity, increases the sensitivity of cells to a stress response (3, 4). SIRT1 is highly expressed in mESC and inhibits p53-dependent transcription (17). SIRT1 negatively regulates NF-κB in the nucleus by the deacetylation of modified lysine residues (18). SIRT1 regulates NF-κB-dependent transcription and cell survival in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (19). Recently, it has been reported that p53 mediates mESC differentiation by suppressing expression of Nanog, a master regulator of mESC (20). Overexpression of NF-κB proteins promoted differentiation, whereas inhibition of NFκB signalling, either by genetic ablation of the Ikbkg gene or overexpression of the IκBα super-repressor, increased expression of pluripotency markers (21), indicating that NF-κB also mediates differentiation of mESC. These suggest that SIRT1 might affect differentiation of mESC by regulation of p53 and NF-κB. Thus, this study analyzed the effect of SIRT1 in in vitro differentiation of mESC into mEB using wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC in the context of modulation of p53 and NF-κB signaling pathway.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and treatment

mESC line R1 (22) and SIRT1-/- mESC derived from R1 (23) were maintained on mitomycin-treated STO feeder layers in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 15% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% GlutaMax (Gibco), 1% nonessential amino acids, antibiotics, 100 μM 2-ME, and 1000 U/ml recombinant LIF.

Western blot

Cells were lysed with M-PER mammalian protein extraction reagent (Pierce, Rockford, USA) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, USA) on ice for 30 min. After spin down (12,000 rpm, 10 min), the whole cell lysates were taken from the supernatant, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membrane at 60 V for 16 h. The membrane was blocked with 3% fat-free milk in tris-buffered saline/0.05% tween-20 for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies (anti-Gadd45a, and anti-SIRT1 antibodies [Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Califonia, USA] anti-p53 and anti-acetyl-p53 [Cell Signaling Technology, Denvers, USA]) for 3 h. After washing, the membrane was further incubated with horseradish peoxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. Proteins were analyzed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (G&E Amersham life science, Uppsala, Sweden).

EB formation

Undifferentiated mESC were trysinzed to obtain a single ESC suspension. A single ESC suspension was placed into 100 mm culture plate with untreated surface (SPL Lifescience, Seoul, Korea). The cells were cultured for 6 day in ESC culture medium without LIF.

Microarray analysis

RNA is prepared from the samples to be compared using the Qiagen RNAeasy Kit, and cDNA is labeled and incorporated with either Cy3 (green) or Cy5 (red) by reverse transcription using Agilent’s Low RNA Input Linear Amplification kit (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, USA).Microarray hybridizations were performed using Agilent Mouse Oligo Microarray (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The hybridized microarrays were washed as the manufacturer’s washing protocol (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, USA). The hybridized images were scanned using Agilent’s DNA microarray scanner and quantified with Feature Extraction Software (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, USA). All data normalization and selection of fold-changed genes were performed using Geneplex (Istech, Seoul, Korea). The averages of normalized ratios were calculated by dividing the average of normalized signal channel intensity by the average of normalized control channel intensity.

Results

Identification of differentially expressed genes

To identify differentially expressed genes between wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC, the expression pattern of 30,604 probe sets was analyzed with a microarray system. 195 and 1,291 genes were differentially upregulated and down-regulated, respectively, by SIRT1 knockout (Data not shown). Top 10 specifically upregulated or downregulated genes in SIRT1 knockout mESC is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

List of 10 specifically upregulated and downregulated genes in SIRT1 knockout mESC

Genbank Gene symbol Gene name

Upregulated
    NM_010345 Grb10 Growth factor receptor bound protein 10
    XM_130038 Cubn Cubilin (intrinsic factor-cobalamin receptor)
    AK044329 A930004D18Rik RIKEN cDNA A930004D18 gene
    AK049087 Cdh4 Cadherin 4
    NM_009876 Cdkn1c Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (P57)
    NM_023118 Dab2 Disabled homolog 2 (Drosophila)
    NM_009434 Phlda2 Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 2
    BC023079 2900078C09Rik RIKEN cDNA 2900078C09 gene
    NM_011446 Sox7 SRY-box containing gene 7
    NM_178703 Slc6a1 Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, GABA), member 1
Downregulated
    AK017935 5830416P10Rik RIKEN cDNA 5830416P10 gene
    NM_029007 AW125753 Expressed sequence AW125753
    AK085009 Fut9 Fucosyltransferase 9
    AK006636 4930485G23Rik RIKEN cDNA 4930485G23 gene
    NM_027275 Ptcd3 Pentatricopeptide repeat domain 3
    NM_173388 Slc43a2 Solute carrier family 43, member 2
    NM_007556 Bmp6 Bone morphogenetic protein 6
    AK084144 Length enriched library, clone:D230003G10 product
    NM_026228 Slc39a8 Solute carrier family 39 (metal ion transporter), member 8

Functional classification of SIRT1 target genes

The probe sets corresponding to all deregulated transcripts were analyzed using David Bioinformatics Tool for molecular and cellular functions. Different categories are ranked according to the numbers of associated genes. SIRT1 knockout deregulates mainly the genes associated with transcription and signal transduction (Data not shown).

SIRT1 inhibits the activation of p53 on the differentiation of mESC

To elucidate whether SIRT1 inhibits p53 or NF-κB function to express their target genes during mESC differentiation, this study also examined changes in p53 and NF-κB target genes during the differentiation of wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC into EB derived from them. The results show that 52% of all genes were upregulated during ESC differentiation in wild mESC whereas 66% of all genes were upregulated in SIRT1 knockout mESC (Fig. 1). Interestingly 29% of p53 target genes were upregulated in wild mESC whereas 79% of p53 target genes were upregulated in SIRT1 knockout mESC (Fig. 1), indicating that SIRT1 inhibits p53 function to express its target genes during ESC differentiation. However, 53% of NF-κB target genes were upregulated in wild mESC whereas 50% of NF-κB target genes were upregulated in SIRT1 knockout mESC (Fig. 1), indicating that SIRT1 has no effect on NF-κB function to express its target genes during ESC differentiation. These results support the conclusion that SIRT1 is involved in the regulation of p53-dependent gene expression, but not, p53-dependent gene expression during ESC differentiation.

Fig.1. The effect of SIRT1 knockout in the expression of p53 or NF-κB target genes during the differentiation of mESC into EB. p53 or NF-κB target genes were mapped to expression ratios for mESC differentiated for 5 day versus undifferentiated ESC. Shown is the distribution of log2-transformed ratios for the p53 or NF-κB target genes that show differential expression more than 1.148 fold in both directions.

Fig.1.

SIRT1 inhibits p53 acetylation and its function of inducing Gadd45a expression in response to methyl methanesulfonate in mESC

SIRT1 inhibits p53 transactivation function through deacetylation of p53 at its C-terminal Lys379 residue (4). To confirm more clearly whether SIRT1 inhibits p53 function during ESC differentiation, this study examined the effect of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a prototypic stimulant of p53, on p53 acetylation and its target gene expression in wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC. MMS treatment increased p53 acetylation and Gadd45a expression levels in SIRT1-/- mESCs but not wild mESCs (Fig. 2), suggesting that SIRT1 inhibits the ability of p53 to induce Gadd45a in response to MMS. These indicate that SIRT1 inhibits p53 function of inducing its target gene expression in mESC. These are consistent with the above finding that SIRT1 inhibits p53 target gene expression during mESC differentiation.

Fig. 2. The effect of MMS on p53 acetylation and Gadd45a expression. Wild or SIRT1-/- mESCs were treated with 1 mM for 1 h. p53 acetylation and Gadd45a expression levels were determined by western blot analysis using anti-acetyl p53 (Lys379) and anti-Gadd45a antibodies.

Fig. 2.

SIRT1 has no effect on hypoxia-induced NF-κB activation in mESC

SIRT1 also inhibits NF-κB activation by deacetylation(18). We also analyzed the effect of hypoxia, a prototypic stimulant of NF-κB, on nuclear translocation of NF-κB in wild and SIRT1 knockout mESC. Hypoxia has no effect on nuclear translocation of NF-κB in wild and SIRT1-/- mESCs (Fig. 3), suggesting that SIRT1 has no effect on the ability of NF-κB to induce its target gene. These are consistent with the above finding that SIRT1 has no effect on NF-κB target gene expression during mESC differentiation.

Fig. 3. No effect of SIRT1 on hypoxia-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB. Wild-and SIRT1 knockout mESC were cultured for 24hr with complete medium under normoxia (20% oxygen) or hypoxia (5%). Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were prepared for NF-κB western blotting. The same blot was probed for β-actin (a control for cytoplasmic fractionation) and TBP (a control for nuclear fractionation).

Fig. 3.

Discussion

This study observed that SIRT1 inhibits p53 signaling pathway during the differentiation of mESC into mEB. SIRT1 is highly expressed in mESC (17, 23, 24) and dis-appears during mESC differentiation into EB (23). This study found that SIRT1 knockout upregulates p53 target genes at day 5 of in vitro differentiaton of mESC into EB. This indicates that SIRT1 may affect early lineage determination in mESC differentiation by regulation of p53 function.

It has been demonstrated that NFκB is inhibited in undifferentiated ESC (25) and is repressed by Nanog (21).It has also been shown that NFκB is activated during ES cell differentiation and that this functions as a positive differentiation stimulus (21). In addition, previous studies have suggested that activation of NFκB may contribute to changes in cell adhesion and cytokine production during ES cell differentiation (26). In contrast to mouse cells,however, NFκB has a positive role in maintaining pluripotency of human ES cells (27), reflecting differences in the self-renewal mechanisms of mouse and human ES cells. However, this study demonstrated that SIRT1 knockout has no effect on NF-κB functions including its target gene expression and nuclear translocation. Thus,this study suggests that SIRT1 modify mESC differentiation independently of NF-κB signaling pathway.

Potential conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicting financial interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare&Affairs, Republic of Korea (A091087).

References

  • 1.Rodgers JT, Lerin C, Haas W, Gygi SP, Spiegelman BM, Puigserver P. Nutrient control of glucose homeostasis through a complex of PGC-1alpha and SIRT1. Nature. 2005;434:113–118. doi: 10.1038/nature03354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Langley E, Pearson M, Faretta M, Bauer UM, Frye RA, Minucci S, Pelicci PG, Kouzarides T. Human SIR2 deacetylates p53 and antagonizes PML/p53-induced cellular senescence. EMBO J. 2002;21:2383–2396. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.10.2383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luo J, Nikolaev AY, Imai S, Chen D, Su F, Shiloh A, Guarente L, Gu W. Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell. 2001;107:137–148. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vaziri H, Dessain SK, Ng Eaton E, Imai SI, Frye RA, Pandita TK, Guarente L, Weinberg RA. hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell. 2001;107:149–159. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00527-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blander G, Guarente L. The Sir2 family of protein deacetylases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:417–435. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaeberlein M, McVey M, Guarente L. The SIR2/3/4 complex and SIR2 alone promote longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two different mechanisms. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2570–2580. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.19.2570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rogina B, Helfand SL. Sir2 mediates longevity in the fly through a pathway related to calorie restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:15998–16003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404184101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;410:227–230. doi: 10.1038/35065638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bordone L, Guarente L. Calorie restriction, SIRT1 and metabolism: understanding longevity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:298–305. doi: 10.1038/nrm1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brunet A, Sweeney LB, Sturgill JF, Chua KF, Greer PL, Lin Y, Tran H, Ross SE, Mostoslavsky R, Cohen HY, Hu LS, Cheng HL, Jedrychowski MP, Gygi SP, Sinclair DA, Alt FW, Greenberg ME. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science. 2004;303:2011–2015. doi: 10.1126/science.1094637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giannakou ME, Partridge L. The interaction between FOXO and SIRT1: tipping the balance towards survival. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:408–412. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nemoto S, Fergusson MM, Finkel T. Nutrient availability regulates SIRT1 through a forkhead-dependent pathway. Science. 2004;306:2105–2108. doi: 10.1126/science.1101731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Motta MC, Divecha N, Lemieux M, Kamel C, Chen D, Gu W, Bultsma Y, McBurney M, Guarente L. Mammalian SIRT1 represses forkhead transcription factors. Cell. 2004;116:551–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00126-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van der Horst A, Tertoolen LG, de Vries-Smits LM, Frye RA, Medema RH, Burgering BM. FOXO4 is acetylated upon peroxide stress and deacetylated by the longevity protein hSir2(SIRT1). J Biol Chem. 2004;279:28873–28879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401138200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takata T, Ishikawa F. Human Sir2-related protein SIRT1 associates with the bHLH repressors HES1 and HEY2 and is involved in HES1- and HEY2-mediated transcriptional repression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;301:250–257. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)03020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fulco M, Schiltz RL, Iezzi S, King MT, Zhao P, Kashiwaya Y, Hoffman E, Veech RL, Sartorelli V. Sir2 regulates skeletal muscle differentiation as a potential sensor of the redox state. Mol Cell. 2003;12:51–62. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00226-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han MK, Song EK, Guo Y, Ou X, Mante C, Broxmeyer HE. SIRT1 regulates apoptosis and Nanog expression in mouse embryonic stem cells by controlling p53 subcellular localization. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee JH, Song MY, Song EK, Kim EK, Moon WS, Han MK, Park JW, Kwon KB, Park BH. Overexpression of SIRT1 protects pancreatic beta-cells against cytokine toxicity by suppressing the nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathway. Diabetes. 2009;58:344–351. doi: 10.2337/db07-1795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yeung F, Hoberg JE, Ramsey CS, Keller MD, Jones DR, Frye RA, Mayo MW. Modulation of NF-kappaB-dependent transcription and cell survival by the SIRT1 deacetylase. EMBO J. 2004;23:2369–2380. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin T, Chao C, Saito S, Mazur SJ, Murphy ME, Appella E, Xu Y. p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:165–171. doi: 10.1038/ncb1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Torres J, Watt FM. Nanog maintains pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells by inhibiting NFkappaB and cooperating with Stat3. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:194–201. doi: 10.1038/ncb1680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, Roder JC. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:8424–8428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McBurney MW, Yang X, Jardine K, Bieman M, Th'ng J, Lemieux M. The absence of SIR2alpha protein has no effect on global gene silencing in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:402–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aladjem MI, Spike BT, Rodewald LW, Hope TJ, Klemm M, Jaenisch R, Wahl GM. ES cells do not activate p53-dependent stress responses and undergo p53-independent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Curr Biol. 1998;8:145–155. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Magness ST, Jijon H, Van Houten Fisher N, Sharpless NE, Brenner DA, Jobin C. In vivo pattern of lipopolysaccharide and anti-CD3-induced NF-kappa B activation using a novel gene-targeted enhanced GFP reporter gene mouse. J Immunol. 2004;173:1561–1570. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Narayanan R, Higgins KA, Perez JR, Coleman TA, Rosen CA. Evidence for differential functions of the p50 and p65 subunits of NF-kappa B with a cell adhesion model. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:3802–3810. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang X, Stojkovic P, Przyborski S, Cooke M, Armstrong L, Lako M, Stojkovic M. Derivation of human embryonic stem cells from developing and arrested embryos. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2669–2676. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Stem Cells are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Stem Cell Research

RESOURCES