Abstract
A binary mixture of Tb3+ and pyrocatechol violet (PV) forms a 1:1 Tb3+/PV complex that can be used in a dye displacement assay. Addition of dipicolinate (DPA) to the Tb3+/DPA complex simultaneously produces a PV color change from blue to yellow and luminescence emission from the newly formed Tb3+/DPA complex.
Many endospore-forming bacteria produce infectious disease in animals and humans.1 For example, species of Bacillus and Clostridium genera are the causative agents of anthrax and tetanus, respectively. Endospores are fascinating examples of biological evolution, and they are endowed with a remarkable set of structural properties that allow them to survive for very long periods of time even under extreme conditions.2 The possibility of endospores being exploited as biological warfare agents is an ongoing national security concern, and there is an urgent need for new and improved methods of killing endospores.3 One way to find novel antibiotics is to screen chemical or photochemical libraries using a high throughput assay that identifies lead candidates for further testing and development.4 In the case of endospores, the classical method for determining antibiotic efficacy employs a 24 hour agar plating process to measure the number of viable colony forming units after treatment.1,5 This method consumes considerable resources and is difficult to develop into a high throughput assay. Alternative assays in the literature focus on the detection of biomarkers that are associated with endospores.6 One of the best known biomarkers is dipicolinate (DPA), a small molecular weight dianion that makes up approximately 5–15% of spore dry weight.7 Previous studies have demonstrated that DPA is released by dead endospores and that the amount of released DPA is a surrogate biomarker for degree of endospore death.8 Thus, we have initiated a project to develop a high throughput screening assay that reports the amount of DPA released by a treated sample of endospores. We expect that the assay will utilize multiwell plates with each microwell containing a separate population of treated endospores. Since the assay can be manipulated to generate reasonably high levels of DPA, the most important design feature is not DPA sensitivity but rather technical convenience. Here, we report our first advance in the project, namely, a dye displacement assay that produces a dual luminescent and colorimetric response to DPA.
The most common modern method for measuring DPA levels employs a Tb3+ luminescence assay that is based on selective transfer of DPA excitation energy to a strongly bound Tb3+.7,9 While this assay is effective for detecting low levels of DPA, the need for a suitable excitation/detection system is a potential burden for labs with limited resources.10 A colorimetric assay that allows DPA detection using naked eye or a cheap digital camera is inherently attractive. The classic literature colorimetric method reacts DPA with Fe2+ ions to form a colored complex with 440 nm absorption.11 Although straightforward, this method is quite insensitive, so we decided to develop a new, more sensitive assay. We were drawn to literature reports of dye displacement assays that employ binary mixtures of visible12 or fluorescent13 dyes and lanthanide cations. Specifically, independent research groups have shown that a complex of Yb3+ and pyrocatechol violet (PV) can be used to optically detect phosphate and polyphosphate anions in buffered aqueous solution.12,14 The phosphate anions displace the PV dye from the Yb3+ and produce a color change from blue to yellow. This precedence led us to consider the dye displacement assay that is illustrated in Fig. 1 with photoactive Tb3+ as a replacement for the Yb3+. Since DPA is known to have high affinity for Tb3+,15 we wondered if it could displace a bound PV dye and produce two simultaneous optical responses: (a) a detectable PV color change from blue to yellow, (b) selective luminescence emission from the Tb3+/DPA. The general concept of a dual colorimetric and luminescent sensing system has been reported previously,16 but to the best of our knowledge this is the first example utilizing a dye displacement process.
Fig. 1.
Dual colorimetric and luminescent sensing assay. Dipicolinate (DPA) displacement of pyrocatechol violet (PV) from a Tb3+/PV complex produces a PV color change from blue to yellow and enhanced luminescence emission from the Tb3+/DPA complex.
The photograph and associated absorption data in Fig. 2 shows that PV does undergo a substantial color change from yellow to blue in the presence of TbCl3 in buffered aqueous solution. Job’s method of continuous variation was applied to confirm the binding stoichiometry of the ensemble as 1:1 Tb3+/PV (Fig. 3).12b,14,17 In addition, an absorbance titration curve fitted nicely to a 1:1 binding model (Fig. 3) and provided an association constant of (4.2 ± 1.4) × 104 M−1 in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0, 295 K.
Fig. 2.

(top) Color photographs showing solutions of PV (50 μM in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0) with different amounts of added TbCl3. (bottom) Absorption spectra for titration of TbCl3 into PV solution (50 μM in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0).
Fig. 3.
(top) Continuous variation plot showing change in Tb3+/PV complex absorbance at 623 nm. (bottom) Representative titration points, and computer curve fitting (dotted line) to a 1:1 binding model, for addition of TbCl3 to a solution of PV (50 μM in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0).
The data in Fig. 4 show that DPA is able to displace the PV and return the color from blue back to yellow. The striking color changes take place almost instantly, can be seen easily with the naked eye and are readily detected as ratiometric responses using a simple spectrometer. The DPA detection dynamic range of 0–100μM corresponds approximately to the amount of DPA in a 1 mL microwell containing 108 Bacillus spores.7–8 It is notable that the sensitivity of this colorimetric Tb3+/PV displacement system (5 μM limit of detection) is more than ten times greater than the classic DPA/Fe2+ formation assay.11
Fig. 4.
(top) Color photographs showing solutions of Tb3+/PV complex (50 μM in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0) with different amounts of added DPA. (bottom) Absorption spectra for titration of DPA into Tb3+/PV complex (50 μM in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0).
Shown in Fig. 5 is a set of luminescence spectra for the same titration of DPA into a solution of Tb3+/PV. The DPA is excited by the 278 nm light and undergoes intersystem crossing to a triplet state from which there is selective energy transfer to the emissive 5D4 level of the bound Tb3+.15 Relaxation of the excited lanthanide leads to the characteristic emission profile seen in Fig. 5. As shown by the inserted graph, emission intensity of the strong 545 nm peak corresponding to the 7F5 ← 5D4 transition increased linearly with added DPA.7,18 It appears that the displaced PV does not affect the photophysics of the newly formed Tb3+/DPA complex, an important finding because PV can act as a fluorescence quencher under certain circumstances.19
Fig. 5.

Luminescence spectra (ex: 278 nm) for titration of DPA into Tb3+/PV complex (50 μM in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0). Inset: Emission intensity at 545 nm due to added DPA.
With further optimization, the dual response system reported here may be well suited as a high throughput assay for the DPA that is released from dead spores. In principle, the color change from blue to yellow should allow very rapid identification of micowells that have higher amounts of dead spores and released DPA (in some cases heat treatment may be needed to accelerate the DPA release).8 Follow up studies of specific wells that have been identified as positive hits during the initial colorimetric screen should subsequently include a luminescence scan using a spectrometer to confirm that the colorimetric response is due to formation of a Tb3+/DPA complex and not a false positive caused by other analytes (e.g., phosphates, aromatic dicarboxylates) or the antibiotic candidate displacing the PV from the Tb3+. It may also be possible to immobilize the Tb3+ on a solid phase and develop a robotic version of this dual colorimetric/luminescence assay.13b,20 From a broader perspective, it seems possible that the dye displacement system in Fig. 1 could be adapted for other chromophore-containing analytes such as tyrosine phosphate derivatives,21 nucleotides,21b and salicylates.22
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the American Chemical Society Project SEED, the National Institutes of Health (GM059078) and the National Science Foundation (CHE1058699). We thank Adam Plaunt and Douglas Rice for helpful discussions.
Notes and references
- 1.Maclean M, Murdoch LE, MacGregor SJ, Anderson JG. Photochem Photobiol. 2013;89:120–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Setlow P. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;101:514–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02736.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, et al. J Amer Med Assoc. 1999;281:1735–1745. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.18.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kirsch J, Siltanen C, Zhou Q, Revzin A, Simonian A. Chem Soc Rev. 2013 doi: 10.1039/c3cs60141b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Zhu C, Yang Q, Liu L, Wang S. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:9607–9610. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Coates ARM, Hu Y. Brit J Pharmacol. 2007;152:1147–1154. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) da Silva RN, Tomé AC, Tomé JPC, Neves MGPMS, Faustino MAF, Cavaleiro JAS, Oliveira A, Almeida A, Cunha Â. Microbiol Immunol. 2012;56:692–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:6918–6925. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6918-6925.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Kim J, Yoon MY. Analyst. 2010;135:1182–1190. doi: 10.1039/c0an00030b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang DB, Tian B, Zhang ZP, Deng JY, Cui ZQ, Yang RF, Wang XY, Wei HP, Zhang XE. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;42:661–667. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.10.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hindle AA, Hall EAH. Analyst. 1999;124:1599–1604. doi: 10.1039/a906846e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Kort R, O’Brien AC, van Stokkum IHM, Oomes SJCM, Crielaard W, Hellingwerf KJ, Brul S. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:3556–3564. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3556-3564.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mallidis CG, Scholefield J. J Appl Bacteriol. 1985;59:479–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb03348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Curiel D, Sanchez G, Mas-Montoya M, Tarraga A, Molina P. Analyst. 2012;137:5499–5501. doi: 10.1039/c2an35895f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Palomino JC, Martin A, Portaels F. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2007;13:754–762. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Janssen FW, Lund AJ, Anderson LE. Science. 1958;127:26–27. doi: 10.1126/science.127.3288.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Gaidamauskas E, Parker H, Kashemirov BA, Holder AA, Saejueng K, McKenna CE, Crans DC. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103:1652–1657. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gaidamauskas E, Saejueng K, Holder AA, Bharuah S, Kashemirov BA, Crans DC, McKenna CE. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2008;13:1291–1299. doi: 10.1007/s00775-008-0415-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Gaidamauskas E, Crans DC, Parker H, Saejueng K, Kashemirov BA, McKenna CE. New J Chem. 2011;35:2877–2883. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yilmaz MD, Hsu SH, Reinhoudt DN, Velders AH, Huskens J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:5938–5941. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yin C, Gao F, Huo F, Yang P. Chem Commun. 2004;0:934–935. doi: 10.1039/b315965e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cable ML, Levine DJ, Kirby JP, Gray HB, Ponce A. In: Adv Inorg Chem. van Rudi E, Grażyna S, editors. Vol. 63. Academic Press; 2011. pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Gunnlaugsson T, Kruger PE, Lee TC, Parkesh R, Pfeffer FM, Hussey GM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:6575–6578. [Google Scholar]; (b) Mashraqui SH, Betkar R, Ghorpade S, Tripathi S, Britto S. Sens Actuat B-Chem. 2012;174:299–305. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Connors KA. Binding Constants: The Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability. Wiley; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barnes LS, Kaneshige KR, Strong JS, Tan K, von Bremen HF, Mogul R. J Inorg Biochem. 2011;105:1580–1588. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jang HH, Yi S, Kim MH, Kim S, Lee NH, Han MS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:6241–6243. [Google Scholar]
- 20.(a) Lee I, Oh WK, Jang J. J Hazard Mater. 2013;252–253:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ma B, Zeng F, Zheng F, Wu S. Analyst. 2011;136:3649–3655. doi: 10.1039/c1an15384f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.(a) Akiba H, Sumaoka J, Komiyama M. Chembiochem. 2009;10:1773–1776. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Akiba H, Sumaoka J, Komiyama M. Chem-Eur J. 2010;16:5018–5025. doi: 10.1002/chem.200903379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee YC. Anal Biochem. 2001;293:120–123. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



