Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1983 Sep;80(17):5171–5175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.17.5171

Correlation of crystallographically determined and computationally predicted hydrogen-bonded pairing configurations of nucleic acid bases.

R L Ornstein, J R Fresco
PMCID: PMC384213  PMID: 6577415

Abstract

Crystals of pairs of H-bonded nucleic acid bases are generally grown from nonaqueous solutions. We have been able to predict the H-bonded configuration of most of the base pairs in such crystals by using an empirical-potential function we recently developed for calculating the energetics of such interactions in chloroform solution. The following configurations were computationally predicted to predominate and are those observed in crystal structures: the Watson-Crick G.C configuration instead of two competing configurations; the Hoogsteen-type configurations for A.T, A.U, and A.br5U instead of Watson-Crick-type configurations; the Watson-Crick-type configurations for 2-aminopurine.br5U instead of the purine N3-type configuration; the Watson-Crick-type configurations for 8-bromo-2,6-diaminopurine.T instead of the Hoogsteen or purine-N3-type configurations; the syn-anti configuration for br8A.br8I instead of the anti-anti configuration; the Watson-Crick-type configurations for br8A.br5U instead of the Hoogsteen-type configurations; and the Hoogsteen-type configurations for me8A.T instead of the Watson-Crick configurations. In addition, the H-bonded base triplet br5U.2,6-diaminopurine.br5U was calculated to have Hoogsteen and Watson-Crick-type configurations but not the purine N3-type configuration. Apparently, lattice forces and chance nucleation of a minor base pairing configuration are not significant when the stability difference between the preferred and alternative configurations exceeds a relatively small value. In one case, in order to correctly predict the base pairing configuration in the crystal, it was necessary to include a contribution due to a C--H...O bond, suggesting that this type of H bond can make a significant contribution to base pair stability.

Full text

PDF
5171

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Crick F. H. Codon--anticodon pairing: the wobble hypothesis. J Mol Biol. 1966 Aug;19(2):548–555. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80022-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mazza F., Sobell H. M., Kartha G. Base-pairing configurations between purines and pyrimidines in the solid state. IV. Crystal and molecular structure of two 1:1 hydrogen-bonded complexes, 1-methyl-5-bromouracil: 9-ethyl-2-aminopurine and 1-methyl-5-fluorouracil: 9-ethyl-2-aminopurine. J Mol Biol. 1969 Aug 14;43(3):407–422. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90349-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sakore T. D., Sobell H. M. Crystal and molecular structure of a hydrogen-bonded complex containing adenine and hypoxanthine derivatives: 9-ethyl-8-bromoadenine-9-ethyl-8-bromohypoxanthine. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jul 14;43(1):77–87. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90080-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sakore T. D., Tavale S. S., Sobell H. M. Base-pairing configurations between purines and pyrimidines in the solid state. I. Crystal and molecular structure of a 1:2 purine-pyrimidine hydrogen-bonded complex: 9-ethyladenine-1-methyl-5-iodouracil. J Mol Biol. 1969 Aug 14;43(3):361–374. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90346-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Simundza G., Sakore T. D., Sobell H. M. Base-pairing configurations between purines and pyrimidines in the solid state. V. Crystal and molecular structure of two 1:1 hydrogen-bonded complexes, 1-methyluracil: 9-ethyl-8-bromo-2,6-diaminopurine and 1-ethylthymine: 9-ethyl-8-bromo-2,6--diaminopurine. J Mol Biol. 1970 Mar 14;48(2):263–278. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90160-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Topal M. D., Fresco J. R. Base pairing and fidelity in codon-anticodon interaction. Nature. 1976 Sep 23;263(5575):289–293. doi: 10.1038/263289a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Topal M. D., Fresco J. R. Complementary base pairing and the origin of substitution mutations. Nature. 1976 Sep 23;263(5575):285–289. doi: 10.1038/263285a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WATSON J. D., CRICK F. H. Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature. 1953 May 30;171(4361):964–967. doi: 10.1038/171964b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WATSON J. D., CRICK F. H. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature. 1953 Apr 25;171(4356):737–738. doi: 10.1038/171737a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES