Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: Vet Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00938.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00938.x

Radiographic Hip Joint Phenotype of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi

Georga T Karbe 1, Darryl N Biery 1, Thomas P Gregor 1, Urs Giger 1, Gail K Smith 1
PMCID: PMC3842694  NIHMSID: NIHMS526587  PMID: 23253037

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the radiographic hip joint phenotype of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi.

Study Design

Prospective and retrospective cross-sectional study.

Animals

Pembroke Welsh Corgis (n = 399).

Methods

Ventrodorsal, hip-extended radiographs were evaluated for subluxation, osteoarthritis (OA), caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes (CCO), and circumferential femoral head osteophytes (CFHO) of PennHIP evaluated Corgis. Joint laxity was measured by distraction index (DI).

Results

All Corgis had DI > 0.30 (mean, 0.66), 6.8% had OA, 18% had subluxation, 22.3% had CCO, and 74.4% had CFHO. Higher DI increased the odds for subluxation and canine hip dysplasia (CHD) but not for OA, CCO, or CFHO. The presence of CCO increased the odds for OA by 4.6 times (P = .002) and 2.2 times (P = .01) for hip dysplasia. All dogs with OA had CFHO. The presence of CFHO increased the odds for subluxation by 8.7 times (p < .001) and 8.9 times (P < .001) for hip dysplasia. Subluxation increased the odds for OA by 15.4 times (P < .001).

Conclusion

Corgis had a low frequency of conventional OA despite having hip laxity that has been shown to correlate with hip OA and hip dysplasia in large-breed dogs. The relationship between CCO and OA was similar to published findings in nonchondrodystrophic large-breed dogs and the CFHO was significantly associated with subluxation. Both CCO and CFHO are associated with hip dysplasia in this small chondrodystrophic breed.


Canine hip dysplasia is recognized as one of the most common and debilitating orthopedic diseases of large- and giant-breed dogs.1, 2 It is a heritable disease of complex genetics, with defects in several currently unidentified genes. In addition to the genetic components, environmental factors, including diet, age, and body weight are known to influence the development of hip dysplasia and its clinical signs.3, 4 Distinct differences in disease prevalence and susceptibility however, have been reported even among dogs of similar body size and weight. For instance, German Shepherds are at a significantly greater risk for osteoarthritis (OA) than Golden retrievers, Labrador retrievers, and Rottweilers having similar joint laxity.1, 5, 6

Joint laxity, evident as subluxation or measured by distraction index (DI), is a well established risk factor for hip dysplasia in large-breed dogs.3, 4, 7, 8 Osteophyte formations along the femoral neck, termed caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes (CCO) are important radiographic findings associated with hip dysplasia and can be considered early signs of OA.912 A distinct rim, appearing as a radiopaque line encircling the junction of the femoral head and neck at the site of capsular attachment, termed circumferential femoral head osteophyte (CFHO), has also been described as a sensitive predictor for the development and progression of OA in several large-breed dogs.12, 13 This radiopaque rim was the earliest sign of hip dysplasia in a group of Labrador retrievers followed from birth until end of life.13 Both the CCO and CFHO have been associated with joint laxity and contribute to the diagnosis of hip dysplasia in large-breed dogs.

A distinct difference, however, has been suggested between the CFHO in large-breed dogs and the presence of a radiopaque rim, similar in appearance and location, regularly found in adult chondrodystrophic dogs, particularly the Corgi.12, 13 In these dogs, the line represents a prominent, sharp rim encircling the femoral head13; however, its importance and relationship to joint laxity, OA, or hip dysplasia have not been elucidated in chondrodystrophic breeds. Many radiologists consider this bony rim normal for the Corgi breed.

Although several small-breed dogs, as well as cats, have been reported to develop hip dysplasia, little is currently known about the genetic predisposition, risk factors, disease progression, or clinical and radiographic features in these breeds and species.2, 1419 In one registry (Orthopedic Foundation for Animals [OFA]), the Pug is listed as having the 2nd highest prevalence of hip dysplasia (63.8%) and several other small-breed dogs seem to be commonly affected.2

Our purpose was to describe the radiographic hip joint phenotype of the Pembroke Welsh Corgi and to test 2 diametrically opposed hypotheses: that CFHO has no relationship to hip dysplasia and is therefore normal for the breed, or alternatively, that CFHO is a radiographic marker, risk factor, or osteophytic component of canine hip dysplasia in the Corgi breed just as it is in nonchondrodystrophic dogs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hip radiographs derived from 2 sample populations of Pem-broke Welsh Corgis were included in this study: (1) Archived ventrodorsal, hip-extended radiographs, and compression and distraction radiographs of Corgis drawn from the PennHIP database, and (2) Prospectively acquired hip-extended, compression, and distraction hip radiographs from Corgis ≥4 years of age recruited for this study.

All hip-extended radiographs were digitized20 and evaluated by the same board-certified radiologist for signs of hip dysplasia, OA, subluxation, CCO, and CFHO. The CCO was visible as a radiopaque line located on the caudal aspect of the femoral neck as seen on the hip-extended radiograph.911, 21 The presence of a CFHO was subjectively determined based on the appearance of a radiopaque rim encircling the junction of the femoral head and neck near the site of capsular attachment (Fig 1).13 The diagnosis of OA followed conventional criteria, based on the appearance of subchondral bone sclerosis along the craniodorsal acetabulum and/or osteophytes on the cranial and caudal aspects of the acetabular margin or femoral periarticular osteophytes.22 The CCO and CFHO were evaluated separately and were not factors included in the diagnosis of OA or hip dysplasia. Hip-extended radiographs were subjectively graded as dysplastic or normal based on an OFA-type scoring system. Subjectively determined subluxation without radiographic signs of OA was graded as mild hip dysplasia.2 Hip joints showing OA with or without evidence of subluxation were scored as moderate or severe hip dysplasia based on the progression of OA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ventrodorsal, hip-extended radiograph of a 4.5-year-old, female spayed Corgi with circumferential femoral head osteophytes (CFHO), caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes (CCO), subluxation, and osteoarthritis (OA).

Each dog is represented once within this study. All dogs were included if the respective hip films were available in the archives. For statistical analyses, dogs were included if a DI was recorded for at least 1 hip joint. The larger (looser) DI was chosen to represent an objective measure of hip joint laxity for each dog. Seven dogs in this study had DI available from only 1 hip because of the presence of cavitation23 on the opposite hip. In these cases, the single DI was chosen to represent the dog. The existence of OA, CCO, CFHO, and subluxation from either or both hips was recorded and used in the analyses. Comparisons of mean age, body weight, and DI between disease groups were performed using the Student t-test. Proportions of joint abnormalities were compared using the z-test. For the purposes of the study, Corgis were grouped into 3 age intervals: (1) 4–11 months (juveniles), (2) 12–23 months (young adults), and (3) ≥24 months (adults). A 1-wayANOVA was performed to evaluate differences in mean DI and mean weight among these age groups. To assess the prevalence of radiographic findings by age, Corgis were divided into the following age groups: <0.5; ≥0.5–<1; ≥1–<2; ≥2–<4; ≥4–<6; and ≥6 years. Based on the age groups, the relationships between age and prevalence of subluxation, OA, CCO, and CFHO were evaluated. Five separate logistic regression models were constructed with the dependent variable being hip dysplasia, subluxation, OA, CCO, and CFHO. The logistic regression analyses were used to determine the effect of covariates; age, weight, gender, DI, subluxation, OA, CCO, and CFHO as risk factors for the radiographic existence of each of these dependent variables (excluding the respective outcome variable). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated from the logistic model for significant covariates (risk factors). All tests were performed using commercially available statistical software (SPSS 12.0 for windows, Copyright SPSS 1989–2003, Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 399 Pembroke Welsh Corgis were evaluated radiographically for hip dysplasia in this study; 372 were retrospective cases from the archives, radiographed between 1995 and 2010, and 27 older Corgis (≥4 years of age) were prospectively examined in 2009. Ranges and means of age, weight, and DI as well as prevalence of hip dysplasia, OA, CCO, CFHO, and subluxation were tabulated (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of Age, Weight, Distraction Index (DI), and Joint Abnormalities

All Juvenile Young Adult Adult Females Males
N 399 89 113 197 247 152
Age*(years) 2.3 ± 1.8 (0.31–10.79) 0.62 (0.31–0.99) 1.4 (1.0–1.99) 3.6 (2.0–10.8) 2.29 (0.31–10.6) 2.41 (0.33–10.8)
Weight*(kg) 11.3 ± 2.5 (5.0–23.6) 9.0 (5.0–1145) 11.6 (7.7–16.8) 12.2 (7.7–23.6) 10.72 (5.0–23.6) 12.37 (5.0–17.7)
DI* 0.66 ± 0.13 (0.33–1.06) 0.68 (0.36–1.0) 0.65 (0.39–0.95) 0.66 (0.33–1.06) 0.68 (0.35–1.06) 0.64 (0.33–0.97)
Osteoarthritis (OA [%]) 6.8 1.1 0 13.2
Caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes (CCO [%]) 22.3 5.6 17.7 32.5 7.3 5.9
Circumferential femoral head osteophytes (CFHO [%]) 74.4 29.2 85.8 88.3 21.5 23.7
Coxofemoral Subluxation (Sblx [%]) 18.0 7.9 9.7 27.4 74.9 73.7
Canine Hip Dysplasia (CHD [%]) 20.1 9 9.7 31 17.8 18.4
*

Mean ± SD (range).

Overall weight based on 368 dogs.

n: number of dogs.

Juvenile: dog’s age < 12 months; young adult: dog’s age 12–23 months; adult: dog’s age ≥ 24 months.

Logistic regression analysis showed age to be a significant risk factor for hip dysplasia, OA, CCO, and CFHO; for every 1 year increase in age, the odds for hip dysplasia increased 1.3 times (P = .002), the odds for OA increased 1.5 times (P < .001), and the odds for CCO and CFHO increased 1.4 times (P < .001; P = .004 respectively; Table 2). The probability for OA increased for dogs having contemporaneous coxofemoral subluxation with an OR of 15.4 (P < .001). The prevalence of OA increased linearly with age (r2 = 0.945; P = .001; Fig 2).

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Analyses: Dependent Variables are Hip Dysplasia (CHD), Subluxation, Osteoarthritis (OA), Caudolateral Curvilinear Osteophytes (CCO), and Circumferential Femoral Head Osteophytes (CFHO). Covariates are Age, Weight, Gender Distraction Index (DI), Subluxation, CCO, CFHO, OA (Only Statistically Significant Covariates Listed with P < 0.05).

Significant Covariates Value (B) Significance Odds Ratio (OR)
Dependent Variable = Hip Dysplasia (CHD)
DI 7.485 <0.001 1781.738*
Age (years) 0.243 0.002 1.275
CCO 0.799 0.010 2.222
CFHO 2.187 <0.001 8.910
Significant Covariates Value (B) Sig. OR

Dependent Variable = Subluxation
DI 7.921 <0.001 2753.865
OA 2.438 <0.001 11.446
CFHO 2.163 <0.001 8.694
Significant Covariates Value (B) Sig. OR

Dependent Variable = OA
Age (years) 0.405 <0.001 1.499
CCO 1.529 0.002 4.612
Subluxation 2.737 <0.001 15.446
Significant Covariates Value (B) Sig. OR

Dependent Variable = CCO
Age (years) 0.069 <0.001 1.358
OA 0.448 <0.001 5.509
Significant Covariates Value (B) Sig. OR

Dependent Variable = CFHO
Age (years) 0.316 0.004 1.371
Weight (Kg) 0.382 <0.001 1.465
Gender 0.624 0.048 1.867
Subluxation 2.147 0.004 8.562
*

OR for each 0.10 increase in DI is 2.11.

OR for each 0.10 increase in DI is 2.21.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Proportion of radiographic findings by age groups. Plots on graph represent proportion of osteoarthritis (OA), subluxation, circumferential femoral head osteophytes (CFHO), and caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes (CCO) at the mean age for each age group (0.37 years; 0.72 years; 1.44 years; 2.75 years; 4.74 years; 7.64 years). Age groups represented in Table 4.

Dogs with CCO were significantly older and heavier than those without CCO (Student t-test; P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). The presence of CCO significantly increased the odds for hip dysplasia (OR 2.2, P = .01) and OA (OR 4.6, P = .002) but did not significantly increase the odds for subluxation (Table 2). The prevalence of CCO increased linearly with age (r2 = 0.976; P < .001; Fig 2).

All Corgis with conventionally determined OA had a CFHO. Using a Student t-test, Corgis with radiographic evidence of CFHO were found to be significantly heavier (P < .001) and older (P < .001) than dogs without this radiographic feature (Table 3). For every 1 kg increase in body weight, the odds for CFHO increased by 1.5 times (P < .001). Dogs with CFHO had 8.7 times (P = .004) greater odds for having subjective subluxation on HE radiographs and 8.9 times (P < .001) greater odds for conventional hip dysplasia (Table 2). A linear increase of CFHO prevalence was seen in Corgis between 4 months and 1 year of age, after which the CFHO prevalence remained constant at >80% for all age groups older than 1 year of age (Table 4, Fig 2).

Table 3.

Radiographic Joint Abnormalities

OA
+
OA
P CCO
+
CCO
P CFHO
+
CFHO
P Sblx
+
Sblx
P CHD
+
CHD
P
n 27 372 89 310 297 102 72 327 80 319
Age 4.1 2.2 <.001 3.3 2 <.001 2.7 1.4 <.001 2.8 2.2 .014 3.1 2.1 <.001
DI 0.7 0.66 ns 0.67 0.66 ns 0.66 0.68 ns 0.73 0.65 <.001 0.74 0.65 <.001
Weight* 12.4 11.3 .011 12.1 11.1 <.001 11.9 9.7 <.001 12.2 11.2 <.001 12.3 11.1 <.001
OA 20% 3% <.001 9% 0% .002 26% 2% <.001 34% 0% <.001
CCO 67% 19% <.001 26% 11% .001 38% 19% <.001 40% 18% <.001
CFHO 100% 73% .002 88% 71% .001 94% 70% <.001 95% 69% <.001
Sblx 70% 14% <.001 30% 15% <.001 23% 4% <.001 90% 0% <.001
*

Overall weight based on 368 dogs.

Statistical differences between mean age, weight and DI calculated using Student t-test and statistical differences in proportions of joint abnormalities calculated using z-test. Sblx: coxofemoral subluxation; CHD: canine hip dysplasia; (+ present, − absent).

Table 4.

Proportions of Osteoarthritis (OA), Subluxation, Caudolateral Curvilinear Osteophytes (CCO), Circumferential Femoral Head Osteophytes (CFHO), and Hip Dysplasia by Age Group

Age Group (Years) n* Mean Weight (kg) Mean DI OA Sblx CCO CFHO CHD
<0.5 26 6.7 0.72 0 (−) 0 (−) 0 (−) 1 (4) 0 (−)
≥0.5–<1 63 10.1 0.67 1 (2) 7 (11) 5 (8) 25 (40) 8 (13)
≥1–<2 113 11.6 0.65 0 (−) 11 (10) 20 (18) 97 (86) 11 (10)
≥2–<4 140 12.1 0.67 16 (11) 43 (31) 37 (26) 125 (89) 45 (32)
≥4–<6 37 12.5 0.65 5 (14) 9 (24) 15 (41) 32 (86) 10 (27)
≥6 20 12.5 0.59 5 (25) 2 (10) 12 (60) 17 (85) 6 (30)
*

n: number of dogs in each age group.

Over all weights based on n = 368.

The proportions of OA, CCO, and CFHO are based on appearance in either right or left hip joint or both (n[%]). Mean DI calculated using highest DI per dog.

See Figure 2.

Based on the presence of conventional OA and/or subluxation, 20% (80/399) of the Corgis were considered dysplastic, of which 90% (72/80) had coxofemoral subluxation and 34% (27/80) had OA. Only 1 dog <1 year of age was found to have OA, whereas the remaining dogs in this age group were diagnosed to have hip dysplasia based on the presence of subluxation alone. DI significantly increased the odds for subluxation; every 0.1 increase in DI increased the odds for subluxation by 2.2 times (P < .001; Table 2). Similarly, the mean DI of Corgis considered dysplastic (0.74) was significantly higher than the mean DI of nondysplastic (0.65) Corgis (Student t-test; P < .001; Table 3). For every 0.1 increase in DI, the odds for hip dysplasia, conventionally diagnosed on HE radiographs, increased by 2.1 times (P < .001). The frequency of subluxation and CHD increased with joint laxity by DI (Table 5).

Table 5.

Proportions of Osteoarthritis (OA), Subluxation, Caudolateral Curvilinear Osteophytes (CCO), Circumferential Femoral Head Osteophytes (CFHO), and Orthopedic Foundation for Animals (OFA) Grades by DI Intervals

DI Interval N Mean Age Mean Weight* OA CCO CFHO Sblx CHD
0.33–0.49 53 3.1 12.0 2 (3.8) 10 (18.9) 41 (77.4) 0(−) 2 (3.8)
0.50–0.59 127 2.2 11.3 4 (3.1) 26 (20.5) 96 (75.6) 12 (9.4) 13 (10.2)
0.60–0.69 108 2.4 11.4 10 (9.3) 32 (29.6) 81(75.0) 25 (23.1) 28 (25.9)
≥ 0.70 111 2.0 11.1 11 (9.9) 21 (18.9) 79 (71.2) 35 (31.5) 37 (31.5)
*

Over all weights based on n = 368. The proportions of OA, CCO, and CFHO are based on appearance in either right or left hip joint or both [n(%)].

CHD: canine hip dysplasia. Mean DI calculated using highest DI per dog.

Radiographic lines on the proximal femur (CCO or CFHO) were frequently seen in dysplastic Corgis with 95% (76/80) having CFHO and 40% (32/80) CCO. Of the Corgis older than 2 year of age, 31% (61/197) were considered dysplastic, with 89% (54/61) having subluxation, and 43% (26/61) having OA. Proximal femoral radiopaque lines were also frequently seen in dysplastic Corgis with 98% (60/61) having CFHO and 49% (30/61) having CCO. These radiographic findings were, however, also found in nondysplastic dogs in this age group; 84% (114/136) and 25% (34/136) had CFHO and CCO, respectively.

Significant differences in hip laxity (DI) and weight were seen between male and female Corgis. Male Corgis were significantly (Student t-test; P < .001) heavier than female Corgis whereas females had significantly looser DI than males (Student t-test; P = .01). Using logistic regression analysis, female Corgis had 1.9 times greater odds for having CFHO than males (P = .048). Gender status (intact versus spayed/neutered) was recorded for 166 dogs; 17 were spayed females, 86 intact females, 17 neutered males, and 46 intact males.

DISCUSSION

Whereas hip dysplasia has been clinically and radiographically well characterized in several large- and giant-breed dogs, to our knowledge this is the first study focusing on the hip joints of a small chondrodystrophic breed. The Pembroke Welsh Corgi was selected, because of the suggested unique hip joint conformation, including joint laxity, CCO, and CFHO and their unstudied relationship with hip dysplasia. According to the PennHIP database, the Pembroke Welsh Corgi with a mean DI of 0.66, is, as of March 2011, 1 of the 10 breeds having highest mean hip laxity.24 In the present study, the radiographic hip joint phenotype of this breed was associated with a high degree of joint laxity based on DI and subluxation, the frequent appearance of periarticular, radiopaque lines, and rarely with signs of conventional OA. All 399 Corgis radiographically examined had hip laxity in the disease-susceptible range, (DI ≥ 0.30)25 with higher (looser) DI significantly increasing the odds for conventional hip dysplasia, consistent with findings in large-breed dogs.5, 7 Whereas the degree of joint laxity (0.66 ± 0.13; mean DI ± SD) would have predicted an average 20–60% probability for the development of OA in large-breed dogs older than 2 years of age,5 only 13.2% of Corgis >2 years manifested radiographic findings of conventionally defined OA. Other osteophyte-like radiographic features, however, were highly prevalent in this group of Corgis. The CCO was associated with hip disease; its presence significantly increasing the odds for OA and hip dysplasia. Similarly, the CFHO significantly increased the odds for hip dysplasia and subluxation, but not OA. The CCO and CFHO were associated with different components of hip dysplasia, namely OA and subluxation, respectively so that each radiographic feature represents a component of hip dysplasia in the Corgi.

Joint laxity by DI indicated that all members of this sample of Corgis were OA susceptible, with higher DI increasing the odds for hip dysplasia. The absence of dogs with DI < 0.30 made it impossible to determine a definitive relationship between these radiopaque lines and the full clinical range of DI. Interestingly, female Corgis were at a greater risk for having a CFHO than males, with females (0.68) having significantly higher DI than males (0.64). The gender difference in DI of 0.04 is small and may not have clinical significance; however, it is the first breed in which it has been found. Although speculation, it may reflect greater selection pressure for better hips in males or, alternatively, it may represent greater selection bias for males to have PennHIP evaluation.

The radiographic hip joint phenotype suggests that despite severe hip laxity, only a small proportion of Corgis show characteristic radiographic evidence of OA and the breed therefore may be less susceptible to hip dysplasia. The OFA ranks the Pembroke Welsh Corgi as one of the top 50 breeds in terms of hip dysplasia prevalence (18.4% as of May 2011).2 Similarly, the present study diagnosed hip dysplasia in 31% of Corgis >2 years of age, agreeing favorably with this figure. The lack of conventional radiographic signs of hip OA in this breed motivated us to scrutinize the hips for other phenotypic signs of disease, such as coxofemoral subluxation or nonconventional radiographic features such as the CCO and CFHO to determine their possible role in disease susceptibility. Of the dysplastic dogs older than 2 years of age, 89% (54/61) were diagnosed dysplastic based on the radiographic appearance of subluxation, which suggests that joint laxity in the Corgi is an important risk factor for disease, though not by itself a definitive sign of a degenerative process.

Subluxation as evident on the hip-extended radiograph has empirically been accepted to be the primary cause of hip OA in dysplastic dogs.8 To date, there are no definitive studies evaluating the relationship between subluxation and the development of OA despite its worldwide acceptance as a hallmark for disease. The DI in comparison has repeatedly been shown to be a significant risk factor for OA in large-breed dogs.3, 4 In this cohort of Corgis, only 26% (19/72) of those with subluxation on hip-extended radiographs had conventional OA whereas 94% (68/72) had a CFHO. Similarly, only 8% (27/399) of Corgis with DI in the OA-susceptible range (DI ≥ 0.30) had OA whereas 74.4% (297/399) had a CFHO. All dogs with subluxation were considered dysplastic in this group of Corgis; however, only a small percentage with joint laxity by subluxation had radiographic evidence of conventional OA, whereas a vast majority had a CFHO. The appearance of radiographic OA is accepted to be age-dependent and its progression is influenced by environmental factors such as body weight.3, 4, 22 In this group of young Corgis, it may be argued that the breed’s small body size and young average age contributed to the low OA prevalence despite presence of subluxation and high DI measurements. In contrast, the CFHO was highly prevalent and radiographically manifested at 1 year of age. The significant relationship between CFHO and subluxation and hip dysplasia support the hypothesis that this radiopaque rim is a component of hip dysplasia in the Corgi and may even be the earliest radiographic indicator.

In large-breed dogs, CFHO was found to be the earliest radiographic finding in 50–70% of dogs that subsequently developed hip dysplasia and was present in 87% of dogs, 6–7 months of age, that developed OA by 2 years of age.12, 13 Although dogs were not followed longitudinally in the present study, all Corgis were disease susceptible based on the described DI threshold, and the presence of CFHO was significantly linked to subluxation as seen on the hip-extended radiograph. A marked increase in CFHO prevalence was observed between dogs <1 year of age and those >1 year of age (Fig 2), suggesting that CFHO is a progressive, likely degenerative phenomenon like other signs of hip dysplasia. A similar rapid increase in CFHO prevalence between 6 months and 1 year of age was reported in a group of Foxhounds, of which most ultimately developed OA.12 It was suggested that the Foxhound’s severe hip laxity led to this rapid CFHO development. In the Corgi, the presence of CFHO was significantly associated with subluxation and on average, the Corgis’ hip laxity was similarly severe as that of the Foxhound so that the CFHO in the Corgi may also be laxity-based and, therefore, also a part of the hip dysplasia complex. In contrast to the Foxhounds, Corgis manifested little radiographic signs of conventional OA despite similar degrees of joint laxity (DI). This discrepancy may be attributed to the marked difference in body weight between Corgis (12 kg) and Foxhounds (30 kg), the chondrodystrophic conformation and other contributing factors yet undetermined that may act to delay or prevent development of conventional OA. Although the cause and pathogenesis of this radiopaque rim are still not completely understood, its presence in the Corgi was significantly associated with subluxation that in itself is an accepted phenotype of hip dysplasia.

Whereas body weight is a well-recognized nongenetic factor that influences the manifestation and progression of hip dysplasia,3, 4 OA and hip dysplasia are historically reported to be rare (0.2%) in dogs weighing <9 kg.26 Similarly, no OA was seen in Corgis in this sample weighing <10 kg and dogs without a CFHO on average weighed 9.7 kg. The only Corgi <1 year of age found to have conventional OA weighed 12.7 kg. Although the overall average Corgi weighed >9 kg, the breed’s weight may still be low enough to contribute to a higher laxity tolerance, lower disease susceptibility, and slower disease progression. It is important to note, however, that Corgis weighing <10 kg were on average significantly younger (1.3 years) than those weighing ≥10 kg (2.7 years) so perhaps degenerative radiographic joint changes had not yet developed in the lighter dogs.

It may be speculated from this sample of Corgis that the described threshold of 0.30 for large-breed dogs does not apply to the Corgi breed and that perhaps a higher (looser) DI should be considered when evaluating small, chondrodystrophic breeds. In the present study however, radiographic OA was found in Corgis with DIs as low as 0.37 and 0.47, which is suggestive that a similar OA threshold applies to Corgis as it does to nonchondrodystrophic dogs. Minimally, the present data do not refute the previously described 0.30 threshold in the Corgi breed. In this large sample of 399 Corgis, there were no dogs with DI below 0.30; therefore, it could not be definitively assessed whether Corgis with tight hips would show radiographic OA. This represents a limitation of the study population; however, it was unavoidable given the comparatively high hip laxity in the Corgi breed as a whole.

Passive laxity as measured by DI, has been shown to put dogs at risk for functional laxity, creating abnormal forces in the weight-bearing hip and ultimately resulting in joint pathology.6 Laxity tolerance in the Corgi may have reduced the development of conventional radiographic signs of OA, but not the formation of osteophyte-like, radiopaque lines such as the CCO and CFHO, making them perhaps diagnostically useful. Subluxation during weight-bearing places abnormal forces on the articular cartilage, leading to joint inflammation and ultimately thickening of the joint capsule and bony spurs at sites of capsular attachment to the bone.9, 27 It is conceivable that the manifestations of severe joint laxity in the Corgi, may be different than the conventional degenerative process observed in large-breed dogs and instead it may manifest radiographically as CCO or CFHO. If true, and if these radiographic features are not included as diagnostic signs of hip dysplasia, the vast majority of dogs approved for breeding may, in fact, be dysplastic. The significance of the nonconventional osteophytes for diagnosing hip dysplasia in the Corgi, though not identical, is comparable to reports from large-breed dogs.

Because of the large proportion of Corgis manifesting this radiographic sign, it has empirically been deemed “normal” for the breed. The results of this study question this belief because all Corgis had DI in the disease-susceptible range and the CFHO was significantly associated with subluxation and hip dysplasia. Although perhaps considered “normal” for the breed, the CFHO (and hip dysplasia) like chondrodysplasia itself, may be fixed within the breed. Disproportional dwarfism is an accepted genetic trait in the Corgi and therefore considered desirable.28 Hip dysplasia on the other hand, may have similar ubiquity but is distinctly undesirable as a genetic trait within the breed. To reduce the frequency of a multifactorial genetic disease such as hip dysplasia, appropriate selection pressure must be applied to the breeding population.2931 The CFHO in addition to the CCO and other accepted phenotypic signs of hip dysplasia should be taken into account when selecting genetically desirable breeding animals. It is important to emphasize that we are not suggesting that all dogs with CFHO at 2 years of age be excluded from breeding. This would limit the breeding pool to only 12% of the breed and likely create deleterious genetic bottlenecks. Rather, based on the principles of quantitative genetics, Corgi breeders are encouraged to submit dogs for PennHIP evaluation and select breeding candidates from the tighter half (tighter than breed average DI) of the population thereby reducing hip laxity from one generation to the next. After these time-tested principles of quantitative genetics,30 the prevalence of CCO and CFHO (and hip dysplasia) will be systematically lowered. However, given the Corgi’s high hip laxity distribution, it is unclear whether the breed average can be moved to less than a DI of 0.30 even after many generations of selection unless strategies like outcrossing would be implemented.

In contrast to the radiographic onset of CFHO, the cumulative prevalence of CCO and conventional OA continued to increase linearly with age (Fig 2). This linear relationship between OA and CCO prevalence with age is supportive of previous reports in Golden and Labrador retrievers.4, 32 This behavior reinforces other studies showing that laxity-based, secondary joint changes occur at any age and therefore hip dysplasia can manifest even after hip screening at 2 years of age.4, 7 As in the Labrador study, the linear progression of OA is highly suggestive that many more Corgis would have developed laxity-based OA if radiographed at an older age (>10 years). The oldest Corgi at 10.8 years of age showed all 3 radiographic signs (OA, CCO, and CFHO) supporting this contention. In conclusion, the evidence from this study supports that the CCO in the Corgi has clinical significance similar to that in large-breed dogs is a predictor for subsequent disease as well as a radiographic sign, by itself, of hip dysplasia.912, 21

A limitation of this study is that dogs were not followed longitudinally to assess the development and progression of disease in relation to the radiographic findings. Although most Corgis had joint laxity and in addition radiographic findings commonly associated with hip dysplasia in large-breed dogs, the timing and ultimate development of the disease could not be assessed in the Corgi because of the lack of sequential follow-up radiographs. Identification and grading severity of these radiopaque lines may be reflective of radiographic sensitivity and possible observer subjectivity rather than disease severity. Another important limitation of the study was that no dogs with a DI < 0.30 were represented; therefore, it was not possible to fully assess the validity of the 0.30 threshold in the Corgi. Similarly, the prevalence of hip dysplasia may have been underestimated in the present study because many Corgis were <2 years of age and may not have developed radiographic signs of OA at the time of examination.

Summarily, the Pembroke Welsh Corgi shows a homogeneous radiographic hip joint phenotype, consisting of a high degree of joint laxity, very high occurrence of CFHO, and frequent CCO. Based on the strong relationship of the CFHO with both subluxation and hip dysplasia in addition to a growing base of supportive evidence from the literature to date, we propose that hypothesis 1 be rejected and hypothesis 2 be accepted. The presence of a CFHO should not be considered a “normal” finding for the Corgi but rather a component of hip dysplasia as it is in large-breed dogs. Admittedly, additional studies are warranted to further evaluate the clinical significance of both CCO and CFHO. The CCO in the Corgis had similar clinical relevance to that in large-breed dogs as a marker of hip dysplasia and a predictor for OA. Conventionally defined OA was rarely seen in the Corgi, despite the presence of subluxation and DI in the OA-susceptible range. This may be because of the breed’s low body weight or simply the vastly altered conformation of this chondrodysplastic breed. Canine hip dysplasia is not only highly prevalent in large- and giant-breed dogs, but this study suggests that this genetic weakness is also highly prevalent in dogs of smaller stature and with chondrodysplasia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We gratefully acknowledge the many veterinarians and breeders who have contributed data to the PennHIP database, the Philadelphia Area Corgi Group for contributing cases, and Michelle Zappacosta for supporting this study. This study was in part supported by NIH RR02512.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Witsberger TH, Armando Villamil J, Schultz LG, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;232:1818–1824. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.12.1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Orthopedic Foundation for Animals Web site. [Accessed May 31, 2011];Hip dysplasia statistics. Available at: http://www.offa.org/stats-hip.html.
  • 3.Kealy RD, Lawler DF, Ballam JM, et al. Effects of diet restriction on life span and age-related changes in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220:1315–1320. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith GK, Paster ER, Powers MY, et al. Lifelong diet restriction and radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis of the hip joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006;229:690–693. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.5.690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith GK, Mayhew PD, Kapatkin AS, et al. Evaluation of risk factors for degenerative joint disease associated with hip dysplasia in German shepherd dogs, Golden retrievers, Labrador retrievers, and Rottweilers. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001;219:1719–1724. doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Popovitch CA, Smith GK, Gregor TP, et al. Comparison of susceptibility for hip dysplasia between Rottweilers and German shepherd dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995;206:648–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith GK, Lawler DF, Biery DN, et al. Chronology of hip dysplasia in a cohort of 48 Labrador retrievers followed for life. Vet Surg. 2011;41:20–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Henricson B, Norberg I, Olsson SE. On the etiology and pathogenesis of hip dysplasia: a comparative review. J Small Anim Pract. 1966;7:673–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1966.tb04393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morgan JP. Canine hip dysplasia: significance of early bony spurring. Vet Radiol. 1987;28:2–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mayhew PD, McKelvie PJ, Biery DN, et al. Evaluation of a radiographic caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte on the femoral neck and its relationship to degenerative joint disease and distraction index in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220:472–476. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Powers MY, Biery DN, Lawler DF, et al. Use of the caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte as an early marker for future development of osteoarthritis associated with hip dysplasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004;225:233–237. doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Risler A, Klauer JM, Keuler NS, et al. Puppy line, metaphyseal sclerosis, and caudolateral curvilinear and circumferential femoral head osteophytes in early detection of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2009;50:157–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01509.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Szabo SD, Biery DN, Lawler DF, et al. Evaluation of a circumferential femoral head osteophyte as an early indicator of osteoarthritis characteristic of canine hip dysplasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231:889–892. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.6.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tsai KL, Murphy KE. Clinical and genetic assessments of hip joint laxity in the Boykin spaniel. Can J Vet Res. 2006;70:148–150. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Langenbach A, Green P, Giger U, et al. Relationship between degenerative joint disease and hip joint laxity by use of distraction index and Norberg angle measurement in a group of cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998;213:1439–1443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keller GG, Reed AL, Lattimer JC, et al. Hip dysplasia: a feline population study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1999;40:460–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1999.tb00375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Holt E. Hip dysplasia in a cat. J Small Anim Pract. 1978;19:273–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1978.tb05490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hayes MH, Wilson GP, Burt JK. Feline hip dysplasia. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1979;15:447–448. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Corley EA. Hip dysplasia: a report from the orthopedic foundation for animals. Semin Vet Med Surg. 1987;2:141–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.VIDAR Systems Corporation ©. Diagnostic Pro Advantage. Herndon, VA, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ackerman N. Hip dysplasia in the Afghan hound. Vet Radiol. 1982;23:88–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kealy RD, Lawler DF, Ballam JM, et al. Five-year longitudinal study on limited food consumption and development of osteoarthritis in coxofemoral joints in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;210:222–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.LaFond E, Smith GK, Gregor TP, et al. Synovial fluid cavitation during distraction radiography of the coxofemoral joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;210:1294–1297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.PennHIP-Distraction Index Laxity Profile, March 2011, based on breeds with ≥20 submitted dogs
  • 25.Smith GK, Gregor TP, Rhodes WH, et al. Coxofemoral joint laxity from distraction radiography and its contemporaneous and prospective correlation with laxity, subjective score, and evidence of degenerative joint disease from conventional hip-extended radiography in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:1021–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Priester WA, Mulvihill JJ. Canine hip dysplasia: relative risk by sex, size, and breed, and comparative aspects. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1972;160:735–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Riser WH, Rhodes WH, Newton CD. Hip dysplasia: theories of pathogenesis. In: Newton C, Nunamaker D, editors. Textbook of small animal orthopedics. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1985. pp. 953–980. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Parker HG, VonHoldt BM, Quignon P, et al. An expressed Fgf4 retrogene is associated with breed-defining chondrodysplasia in domestic dogs. Science. 2009;325:995–998. doi: 10.1126/science.1173275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Powers MY, Karbe GT, Gregor TP, et al. Relationship of official OFA hip scoring to PennHIP distraction index in a sample of 439 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;237:532–541. doi: 10.2460/javma.237.5.532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Falconer DS, editor. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York, NY: Longman Scientific & Technical; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kapatkin AS, Mayhew PD, Smith GK. Genetic control of canine hip dysplasia. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 2002;24:681–687. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karbe GT, Paster ER, Gregor TP, et al. Age-dependent prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis of canine hip dysplasia in Golden Retrievers (abstr) Proceedings. Vet Orthopedic Society. 2010;1 [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES