Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1983 Sep;80(17):5445–5448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.17.5445

Mutations affect storage and use of memory differentially in Drosophila

Yadin Dudai 1
PMCID: PMC384273  PMID: 16593363

Abstract

The behavior of normal Drosophila and of X-linked olfactory conditioning mutants was analyzed by using an olfactory memory choice task. Memory in normal flies was optimal at 5-12 min after training and then decayed slowly. Memory in the mutants was 40-80% of normal when tested 30 sec after training but it decayed rapidly and was very low after 7 min. Successive conditioning experiments indicated that some types of mutants can behave as though they store information for a longer period than that revealed by straightforward memory tests, but this information reveals itself only by interaction with newly acquired information in a conflict situation. It thus seems that the mutations can either prevent the formation of normal memory or prevent memory from evoking a normal behavioral response.

Keywords: conditioning mutants, neurogenetics, retrieval

Full text

PDF
5445

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Booker R., Quinn W. G. Conditioning of leg position in normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3940–3944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Byers D., Davis R. L., Kiger J. A., Jr Defect in cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase due to the dunce mutation of learning in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1981 Jan 1;289(5793):79–81. doi: 10.1038/289079a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudai Y., Jan Y. N., Byers D., Quinn W. G., Benzer S. dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 May;73(5):1684–1688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duerr J. S., Quinn W. G. Three Drosophila mutations that block associative learning also affect habituation and sensitization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jun;79(11):3646–3650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.11.3646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall J. C., Greenspan R. J. Genetic analysis of Drosophila neurobiology. Annu Rev Genet. 1979;13:127–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.13.120179.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kandel E. R., Schwartz J. H. Molecular biology of learning: modulation of transmitter release. Science. 1982 Oct 29;218(4571):433–443. doi: 10.1126/science.6289442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Quinn W. G., Dudai Y. Memory phases in Drosophila. Nature. 1976 Aug 12;262(5569):576–577. doi: 10.1038/262576a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Quinn W. G., Harris W. A., Benzer S. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):708–712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.3.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Quinn W. G., Sziber P. P., Booker R. The Drosophila memory mutant amnesiac. Nature. 1979 Jan 18;277(5693):212–214. doi: 10.1038/277212a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Uzzan A., Dudai Y. Aminergic receptors in Drosophila melanogaster: responsiveness of adenylate cyclase to putative neurotransmitters. J Neurochem. 1982 Jun;38(6):1542–1550. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb06631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES