Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9384–9388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9384

Chromatin structure and gene expression.

G Felsenfeld 1, J Boyes 1, J Chung 1, D Clark 1, V Studitsky 1
PMCID: PMC38436  PMID: 8790338

Abstract

It is now well understood that chromatin structure is perturbed in the neighborhood of expressed genes. This is most obvious in the neighborhood of promoters and enhancers, where hypersensitivity to nucleases marks sites that no longer carry canonical nucleosomes, and to which transcription factors bind. To study the relationship between transcription factor binding and the generation of these hypersensitive regions, we mutated individual cis-acting regulatory elements within the enhancer that lies between the chicken beta- and epsilon-globin genes. Constructions carrying the mutant enhancer were introduced by stable transformation into an avian erythroid cell line. We observed that weakening the enhancer resulted in creation of two classes of site: those still completely accessible to nuclease attack and those that were completely blocked. This all-or-none behavior suggests a mechanism by which chromatin structure can act to sharpen the response of developmental systems to changing concentrations of regulatory factors. Another problem raised by chromatin structure concerns the establishment of boundaries between active and inactive chromatin domains. We have identified a DNA element at the 5' end of the chicken beta-globin locus, near such a boundary, that has the properties of an insulator; in test constructions, it blocks the action of an enhancer on a promoter when it is placed between them. We describe the properties and partial dissection of this sequence. A third problem is posed by the continued presence of nucleosomes on transcribed genes, which might prevent the passage of RNA polymerase. We show, however, that a prokaryotic polymerase can transcribe through a histone octamer on a simple chromatin template. The analysis of this process reveals that an octamer is capable of transferring from a position in front of the polymerase to one behind, without ever losing its attachment to the DNA.

Full text

PDF
9384

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyes J., Felsenfeld G. Tissue-specific factors additively increase the probability of the all-or-none formation of a hypersensitive site. EMBO J. 1996 May 15;15(10):2496–2507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi O. R., Engel J. D. A 3' enhancer is required for temporal and tissue-specific transcriptional activation of the chicken adult beta-globin gene. Nature. 1986 Oct 23;323(6090):731–734. doi: 10.1038/323731a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chung J. H., Whiteley M., Felsenfeld G. A 5' element of the chicken beta-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila. Cell. 1993 Aug 13;74(3):505–514. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80052-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. A nucleosome core is transferred out of the path of a transcribing polymerase. Cell. 1992 Oct 2;71(1):11–22. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90262-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Corces V. G. Chromatin insulators. Keeping enhancers under control. Nature. 1995 Aug 10;376(6540):462–463. doi: 10.1038/376462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hebbes T. R., Clayton A. L., Thorne A. W., Crane-Robinson C. Core histone hyperacetylation co-maps with generalized DNase I sensitivity in the chicken beta-globin chromosomal domain. EMBO J. 1994 Apr 15;13(8):1823–1830. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06451.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hesse J. E., Nickol J. M., Lieber M. R., Felsenfeld G. Regulated gene expression in transfected primary chicken erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(12):4312–4316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kellum R., Schedl P. A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):941–950. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90318-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kingston R. E., Bunker C. A., Imbalzano A. N. Repression and activation by multiprotein complexes that alter chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1996 Apr 15;10(8):905–920. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.8.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reitman M., Felsenfeld G. Developmental regulation of topoisomerase II sites and DNase I-hypersensitive sites in the chicken beta-globin locus. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2774–2786. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Reitman M., Felsenfeld G. Mutational analysis of the chicken beta-globin enhancer reveals two positive-acting domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6267–6271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reitman M., Lee E., Westphal H., Felsenfeld G. An enhancer/locus control region is not sufficient to open chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):3990–3998. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.3990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reitman M., Lee E., Westphal H., Felsenfeld G. Site-independent expression of the chicken beta A-globin gene in transgenic mice. Nature. 1990 Dec 20;348(6303):749–752. doi: 10.1038/348749a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Studitsky V. M., Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. A histone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template. Cell. 1994 Jan 28;76(2):371–382. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90343-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Studitsky V. M., Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. Overcoming a nucleosomal barrier to transcription. Cell. 1995 Oct 6;83(1):19–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Walters M. C., Fiering S., Eidemiller J., Magis W., Groudine M., Martin D. I. Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):7125–7129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weintraub H. Formation of stable transcription complexes as assayed by analysis of individual templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):5819–5823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao K., Hart C. M., Laemmli U. K. Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary element-associated factor BEAF-32. Cell. 1995 Jun 16;81(6):879–889. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES