Abstract
Objective(s): Spermatogonial Stem Cells (SSCs) maintain spermatogenesis throughout the life of the male. Because of the small number of SSCs in adult, enriching and culturing them is a crucial step prior to differentiation or transplantation. Maintenance of SSCs and transplantation or induction of in vitro spermio-genesis may provide a therapeutic strategy to treat male infertility. This study investigated the enrichment and proliferation of SSCs co-cultured with STO cells in the presence or absence of growth factors.
Materials and Methods: Spermatogonial populations were enriched from the testis of 4-6 week-old male mice by MACS according to the expression of a specific marker, Thy-1. Isolated SSCs were cultured in the presence or absence of growth factors (GDNF, GFRα1 and EGF) on STO or gelatin-coated dishes for a week. Subsequently, the authors evaluated the effects of growth factors and STO on SSCs colonization by alkaline phosphates (AP) activity and flow cytometery of α6 and β1 integrins.
Results: SSCs co-cultured with STO cells and growth factors developed colonization and AP activity as well as expression of α6 and β1 integrins (P≤0/05).
Conclusion: Our present SSC-STO co-culture provides conditions that may allow efficient maintenance and proliferation of SSCs for the treatment of male infertility.
Key Words: SSCs, STO cells, Growth factors, α6 and β1 integrins
Introduction
The spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the foundation of spermatogenesis. They can self-renew and create a large number of differentiated germ cells in vivo (1). A balance between SSC renewal and differentiation in adult testis is indispensable for spermatogenesis and fertility (2). The limited number of spermatogonial stem cells in an adult testis makes identification of a specific SSC marker and direct in vivo analysis of spermatogonial stem cells more difficult. The testis of an adult mouse contains 20,000–35,000 spermatogonial stem cells, representing 0.02-0.03% of the total cells in the testis (3). Therefore, enrichment and in vitro culture of SSCs provides one practical approach to investigating autologous testicular transplantation or genetic manipulation (4). Furthermore, modulating culture conditions for self-renewal, differentiation of SSCs, generation functional gametes in vitro and development of new therapeutic methods for infertility will be attainable (5) however difficult for a number of reasons: there is a remarkable decline in the viability of the cultured cells within one week and the cell proliferation rate is usually low, minimal or absent under adult-like culture conditions and the identification of a specific spermatogonial stem cell marker has been found challenging (6, 7). Ideally, the culture system would initiate with spermatogonia but to date, this has been a tricky endeavor and a culture system supporting propagation and differentiation of adult mouse spermatogonia is still very difficult to attain (8).
We co-cultured SSC with STO in the presence of growth factors to replicate conditions somewhat similar to the natural niche. Efficient preparation of SSCs had been characterized by histological staining and the expression of the specific germ cell markers. Our cell culture conditions produced more SSC cells in vitro, thereby provided more insight into maturation conditions useful for the treatment of male infertility.
Materiasl and Methods
Experimental animals
Testis cells were obtained from 4-6 week-old male mice NMRI (National Medical Research Institute). They were maintained under standard conditions with free access to the food and water. The ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical sciences approved the animal experiments, in accordance with the university guidelines.
SSCs enrichment
In order to obtain the testicular cells, we used a modified method published by Guan (2009). Briefly, a decapsulated testis was cut into small pieces and seminiferous tubules were transferred to Collagenase type IV (1 mg/ml) (Sigma), DNase I (10 μg/ml) (Sigma) solution. Cells were incubated at 37˚C in a 5% CO2 incubator and dispersed by pipetting every 2–5 min until the tubules separated following about 20 min. Cells were washed twice with 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma) as we reported earlier (9). The dissociated testis cells suspension was overlaid on 30% (v/v) Percoll (Sigma) prepared in PBS containing 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco) and centrifuged at 600 g for 8 min at 4˚C. For magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) Miltenyi Biotec protocol was assigned (Miltenyi Biotec). Sedimented cells (bottom fraction) of the Percoll gradient (3–8×106 cells in 90 μl of PBS) were incubated with 10 μl of anti-Thy-1 antibody (30-H12; Miltenyi Biotec) microbeads for 20 min at 4˚C. Following rinsing with PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)(Sigma), Thy-1+cells were designated by passing them through a large separating column (Miltenyi Biotec) and placed in a magnetic field (10).
SSCs culture
Enriched SSCs were cultured (6–10 ×104 cells/cm2) in a minimum essential medium-alpha (MEMα)(Gibco) containing 10% FBS, 1 x nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol )Sigma), 103U/ml human recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)(B&D), 0.4 mM Pyrovate (Sigma), 1x Glutamine (Gibco), 100u/ml Penicillin and 100 μg/ml Streptomycin (Sigma), on STO (mitotically inactivated SIM mouse embryo derived Thioguanine and Ouabain resistant) or gelatin-coated dishes in presence or absence of these growth factors; GDNF (Glial Cell line-derived Neurotrophic Factor) 100 ng/ml, GFRα (Rat Glial cell line-derived Neurotrophic Factor Receptor) 300 ng/ml, (both from B&D) and EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor) 20 ng/ml (B&D) for a one week. The culture medium was changed every other day. All culture media were maintained at 32˚C in an atmosphere humidified with 5% CO2 (9). SSCs colonies were stained with Alkaline Phosphatase (Sigma) following 7 days (11). SSCs number was determined with a hemacytometer. Trypan blue (0.4%) (Sigma) whereas exclusion assays were used to determine the percentage of surviving cells following isolation and culture (12).
STO cells inactivation
STO cells were obtained from the Pasture Institute of Iran. Following the treatment of feeder cell lines (STO) with mitomycin C (10 µg/ml for 3 hr (Sigma) at 37˚C and 5% CO2), feeder cells were dissociated (0.05% trypsin EDTA) (Gibco) and cultured on gelatin coated dishes at 0.5 ×104 cells/cm2 for 6 hr at 37˚ C. Isolated SSCs were seeded at a density of 4×104 cells/cm2 (13).
Cytochemical demonstration of alkaline phosphatase
In order to evaluate SSCs colony formation following a week of cultivation, cultured germ cells were stained with Alkaline Phosphatase. Briefly, following fixation with 10% formaldehyde (Sigma) for 10 min at 4˚C and washing with 0.2 M Tris buffer (pH 8.9), incubation with 0.01% Naphtol-AS-MX Phosphate and 0.06% Fast Violet salt (both from Sigma) in 0.1 M Tris buffer (pH 8.9 for 30 min at 37˚C, cells were washed with distilled water and observed under inverted microscope for a red bright color indicating the expression of Alkaline Phosphatase on SSCs colonies (11).
Flow cytometery
Flow cytometric analysis (Becton Dickinson) was performed on populations of testis cells before, following enrichment and cultivation using a modified method of Shinohara (1999). Briefly, 106 cells were suspended in 0.1 ml of PBS/1% FBS and 10μl fluorescence isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated hamster anti-rat β1-integrin (CD29) antibody was added to the cells for 20 min at 4˚C. The cells were washed twice in 1 mL of PBS/FBS. Subsequently 0.1 ml of PBS/1% FBS and 10μl Phycoerythrin (PE) conjugated rat anti-human a6-integrin (CD49f) (R&D) was complemented to the cells for 20 min at 4˚C. The cells were washed twice with 1 mL of PBS/FBS. Control cells were not treated with an antibody (5).
Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as mean ± SD. The statistical significance between the mean values was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A level of P≤0.05 was considered as significant value.
Results
Spermatogonial stem cells enrichment
The surface antigenic phenotype of SSCs in the mouse testis was reported to be α6-integrin, β1-integrin, Thy-1(CD90), CD24, GFRα1, Ep-CAM, GPR125 (14). In the current study, SSCs were isolated using anti-Thy-1 antibody and MACS. The purity of the isolated cells was determined by flow cytometery using α6 and β1-integrin antibodies. The flow cytometric analysis revealed that of the enriched Thy-1 purified cells, 67.2±2.2% (n=6) expressed β1 integrin, 37.7±1.8% (n=6) expressed α6 integrin and 30.8±1.9% (n=6) of Thy-1-enriched cells expressed both integrins (Figure 1), consistent with former data (51.3±11.9 for β1 integrin ) (5).
SSCs culture
Isolated Thy1+ SSCs were cultured on STO or gelatin-coated dishes in the presence or absence of growth factors. On the first day of culture, SSCs were single and attached to STO or gelatin coated dishes (Figure 2A). Following two days, the majority of round cells aggregated into clumps in which no cytoplasmic bridges could be discerned (Figure 2B), and then colonies were formed on days 2-3 (Figure 2C). These cell colonies were positive for alkaline phosphatase activity (Figure 2D) indicating these colonies were SSCs (10, 11).
Flow cytometric analysis
Following cultivating SSCs in a week, an expression of α6 and β1-integrin was determined by flow cytometric analysis. The flow cytometric analysis revealed that expression of β1 integrin which was up to 64% and α6 integrin up to 11% and both integrins were up to 9% on gelatin coated dishes without growth factors (Figure 3A). On gelatin coated dishes with growth factors, β1 integrin was up to 33% and α6 integrin up to 5%. Both integrins were up to 4% (Figure 3B). When SSCs were cultivated on STO coated dishes, β1 integrin was up to 70% and α6 integrin was up to 10% whereas β1, α6 integrins were up to 10% (Figure 3C). On STO coated dishes with growth factors, β1 integrin was up to 80% and α6 integrin up to 10% and both integrins were up to 10% (Figure 3D). Results in different samples in different groups (n=6/ group) were an expression of β1, α6 integrins on STO coated dishes with growth factors more than other groups (P≤0/05) (Figure 3E).
Our findings strongly suggest that STO cells have substantial role in propagation of SSCs and adding growth factors resulted in the improvement of SSCs propagation and expression β1, α6 integrins.
Discussion
The isolation and proliferation of SSCs may provide a valuable tool for the treatment of male infertility. Our study employed a simple but versatile method to efficiently propagate SSCs using STO cells co-culture and supplements which comprised known important factors for germ cell survival and development.
Mouse SSCs were enriched using anti-Thy-1 antibody and MACS technology. Our results revealed that the isolated SSCs had high purity and expressed two specific surface markers for mouse spermatogonial stem cells, for instance α6 and β1-integrin (5). Similar to our findings, Kubota et al (2004) used Thy-1 microbeads to isolate SSCs by MACS. However, as a source for SSCs, they used cryptorchid adult, pup, and neonate testis, in which SSCs are presented at a considerably higher percentage of total testis cells relative the amount of SSCs found in the adult testis (10). In contrast, our study used adult mouse testis as a source of SSCs, and approximately the same purity of SSCs was obtained as determined by the expression of β1 and α6-integrins (70% compared to 51%) (5) by flow cytometery, indicating the efficiency of our enrichment method.
Because of the limited number of spermatogonial stem cells in an adult testis, ex vivo propagation of SSCs is a crucial step for in vivo or in vitro evaluations. This study investigated the propagation of SSCs co-culture with STO cells in the presence or absence of growth factors, deliberately designed to mimic the natural niche of SSCs. Our in vitro results strongly revealed that STO cells combined with growth factors can improve the numbers of mouse SSCs.
Feeder layers of STO cells have a beneficial role in SSC maintenance, cultivation and proliferation (9, 15). STO cells provided an environment for supporting several types of stem cells and germ cells survived for four months on a feeder layer of STO cells (16, 17). In another study, under the best conditions, 10% to 20% of the SSCs survived for a week or longer using STO feeder layers (4). In our study, we used adult mouse testis as a source of SSCs that are very low but we showed STO cells enhanced SSCs propagation and colony formation and expression of β1 and α6 integrins.
The addition of growth factors or other factors that are normally in testis to the culture medium caused an increase in the number of SSCs (6, 18, 19). Growth factors support in vitro expansion of SSCs and have a positive influence on SSC proliferation (20). GDNF is an important factor in maintaining the undifferentiated population of spermatogonia in the mouse testis and enhanced spermatogonial numbers and is a crucial regulator of stem cell self-renewal in vivo and an increased total number of these cells in vitro (5, 21-24). Therefore, GDNF is important factor for proliferating SSCs. Moreover, undifferentiated spermatogonia express the receptor for GDNF, and consists of the GDNF-family receptor α1 (GFRα1) and c-Ret receptor tyrosine kinase. Adding soluble GFRα1 molecules potentiate the stimulatory signal through the c-Ret receptor or modulate the signaling pathways (21, 25, 26) .Thus, the combination of GDNF and its receptor resulted in a natural condition for SSCs cultivation (20) and was used in tandem in the present study.
Alternatively, the receptor of EGF is functional in spermatogonia and EGF has been proposed to inhibit testicular germ cell differentiation. EGF also caused the proliferation of type A spermatogonia in adult rat seminiferous tubules in vitro (27) and might have an important role in the paracrine regulation of spermatogenesis (19). Likewise, an average concentration of EGF in blood plasma is significantly lower in infertile males. Thus EGF has an important role in the culture of SSCs.
Kubota used growth factors for culturing and replicating of SSCs (10, 20) and we used a combination of growth factors as well. But that study used neonate and pup mice that are rich with SSCs initially whereas our mice were in the adulthood stage. Our data was shown that growth factors have important role in propagating of SSCs in vitro but may be not enough for this purpose (as also indicated in the results of Kubota) (20). However, they obtained these results from neonate and pup mice and yet again, our results were from adult mice.
We concluded that using feeder cells and growth factors together mirrored the natural condition in testis and the observed expression β1 and α6 integrins yielded more than when they were used them separately (β1 integrin was up to 75% and α6 integrin up to 21% and both integrins were up to 21%). Feeder cells and growth factors together caused the propagation of SSCs and more expressions of β1 and α6 integrins.
Conclusion
Our findings indicated that STO feeder cells and growth factors improved SSC expansion and expression of b1 and a6-integrins. Our simple co-culture system may be applicable prior to transplantation or differentiation, although the efficiency of these cells for ART remains unknown and warrants further complementarystudy.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to Prof Karim Nayernia for his beneficial suggestions and Ms M. Nikogoftar for her assistance in Flowcytometric analysis. This work was supported by a grant (No.2575) from Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
References
- 1.Oatley JM, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 2006;419:259–282. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)19011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dadoune JP. New insights into male gametogenesis: what about the spermatogonial stem cell niche. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2007;45:141–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Rooij D, Russell L. All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J Androl. 2000;21:776–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khaira H, McLean D, Ohl DA, Smith GD. Spermatogonial stem cell isolation, storage, and transplantation. J Androl. 2005;26:442–450. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.05062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. beta1- and alpha6-integrin are surface markers on mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96:5504–5509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dirami G, Ravindranath N, Pursel V. Effects of stem cell factor and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on survival of porcine type A spermatogonia cultured in KSOM. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:225–230. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.1.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Morena A, Boitani C, Pesce M, De Felici M, Stefanini M. Isolation of highly purified type A spermatogonia from prepubertal rat testis. J Androl. 1996;17:708–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Izadyar F, Ouden K, Creemers LB, Posthuma G, Parvinen M, de Rooij D. Proliferation and differentiation of bovine type A spermatogonia during long-term culture. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:272–278. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.004986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guan K, Wolf F, Becker A, Engel W, Nayernia K, Hasenfuss G. Isolation and cultivation of stem cells from adult mouse testes. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:143–154. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Culture conditions and single growth factors affect fate determination of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:722–731. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.029207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van der Wee K, Johnson EW, Dirami G, Dym TM, Hofmann MC. Immunomagnetic isolation and long-term culture of mouse type A spermatogonia. J Androl. 2001;22:696–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aslam I, Robins A, Dowell K, Fishel S. Isolation, purification and assessment of viability of spermatogenic cells from testicular biopsies of azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:639–647. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hamra FK, Schultz N, Chapman KM. Defining the spermatogonial stem cell. Dev Biol. 2004;269:393–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yeh J, Nagano M. Spermatogonial stem cell biomarkers: improved outcomes of spermatogonial transplantation in male fertility restoration. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9:109–114. doi: 10.1586/14737159.9.2.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sofikitis N, Pappas E, Kawatani A, Baltogiannis D, Loutradis D, Kanakas N, et al. Efforts to create an artificial testis: culture systems of male germ cells under biochemical conditions resembling the seminiferous tubular biochemical environment. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:229–259. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.De Rooij DG. Regulation of the proliferation of spermatogonial stem cells. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1988;10:181–194. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1988.supplement_10.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Leonida EB, Brinster CJ. Culture of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Tissue Cell. 1998;30:389–97. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(98)80053-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Feng L, Chen Y, Dettin L, Reijo Pera RA, Herr J, Goldberg E, et al. Generation and in vitro differentiation of a spermatogonial cell line. Science. 2002;297:392–399. doi: 10.1126/science.1073162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wahab-Wahlgren A, Martinelle N, Holst M. EGF stimulates rat spermatogonial DNA synthesis in seminiferous tubule segments in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;201:39–46. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(03)00002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Growth factors essential for self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101:16489–16494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407063101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meng X, Lindahl M, Hyvönen M, Parvinen M, de Rooij D, Hess MW, et al. Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science. 2000;287:1489–1493. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Creemers L, Meng X, Ouden K, van Pelt A MM, Izadyar F, Santoro M, et al. Transplantation of germ cells from glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor-overexpressing mice to host testes depleted of endogenous spermatogenesis by fractionated irradiation. Biol Repod. 2002;66:1579–1685. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aponte PM, Soda T, Van De Kant HJG, de Rooij DG. Basic features of bovine spermatogonial culture and effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. Theriogenology. 2006;65:1828–1847. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Ogonuki N, Inoue K, Miki H, Ogura A, Toyokuni Sh. Long-term proliferation in culture and germline transmission of mouse male germline stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2003;69:612–616. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.017012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paratcha G, Ledda F, Ibáñez CF. Released GFR (alpha) 1 potentiates downstream signaling, neuronal survival, and differentiation via a novel mechanism of recruitment of c-Ret to lipid rafts. Neuron. 2001;29:171–184. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yomogida K, Yagura Y, Tadokoro Y, Nishimune Y. Dramatic expansion of germinal stem cells by ectopically expressed human glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in mouse Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod. 2003;69:1303–1309. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.015958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haneji T, Koide SS, Tajima Y, Nishimune Y. Differential effects of epidermal growth factor on the differentiation of type A spermatogonia in adult mouse cryptorchid testes in vitro. J Endocrinol. 1991;128:383–389. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1280383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]