Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2013 Nov 13;2013:143092. doi: 10.1155/2013/143092

Traumatic Brain Injury Related Hospitalization and Mortality in California

Clint Lagbas 1, Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi 2,3,*, Magda Shaheen 4, Dulcie Kermah 5, Deyu Pan 5
PMCID: PMC3845866  PMID: 24324953

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study is to describe the traumatic brain injury (TBI) population and causes and identify factors associated with TBI hospitalizations and mortality in California. Methods. This is a cross-sectional study of 61,188 patients with TBI from the California Hospital Discharge Data 2001 to 2009. We used descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses in SAS version 9.3. Results. TBI-related hospitalizations decreased by 14% and mortality increased by 19% from 2001 to 2009. The highest percentages of TBI hospitalizations were due to other causes (38.4%), falls (31.2%), being of age ≥75 years old (37.2%), being a males (58.9%), and being of Medicare patients (44%). TBIs due to falls were found in those age ≤4 years old (53.5%), ≥75 years old (44.0%), and females (37.2%). TBIs due to assaults were more frequent in Blacks (29.0%). TBIs due to motor vehicle accidents were more frequent in 15–19 and 20–24 age groups (48.7% and 48.6%, resp.) and among Hispanics (27.8%). Higher odds of mortality were found among motor vehicle accident category (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14–1.41); males (AOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.27–1.46); and the ≥75-year-old group (AOR: 6.4, 95% CI: 4.9–8.4). Conclusions. Our findings suggest a decrease in TBI-related hospitalizations but an increase in TBI-related mortality during the study period. The majority of TBI-related hospitalizations was due to other causes and falls and was more frequent in the older, male, and Medicare populations. The higher likelihood of TBI-related mortalities was found among elderly male ≥75 years old who had motor vehicle accidents. Our data can inform practitioners, prevention planners, educators, service sectors, and policy makers who aim to reduce the burden of TBI in the community. Implications for interventions are discussed.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an injury to the head resulting from blunt or penetrating trauma or from acceleration-deceleration of force causing neurological or neuropsychological abnormalities, such as altered level of consciousness, intracranial lesion, memory loss, skull fracture, or death [1]. In the United States, during 2002–2007, approximately 1.7 million Americans sustained some kind of traumatic brain injury, annually. This led to 275,000 hospitalizations (16%), over 1.3,000,000 million visits to the Emergency Department (81%), 52,000 deaths (3.0%), and 124,000 disabilities [2, 3].

TBI-related direct and indirect costs, including medical costs and loss of productivity, totaled an estimated $60 billion in the United States, annually [4]. Findings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data suggest that TBI-related hospitalization (TBI-H) and TBI-related mortality (TBI-M) increased by 3.5% and 19.5%, respectively, from 2002 to 2006 [3]. In a study of the 12 states participating in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention TBI-H surveillance in 2002, California and New York accounted for approximately 54% of all cases reported for TBI-H [3]. However, there is a dearth of research at the state level, especially for California which had 75.8/100,000 cases of TBI-H in 2002 [5].

Our study aim is to examine sociodemographic variables related to TBI-H, TBI-related causes (TBI-C), and TBI-M in California. Based on the existing literature, we hypothesize that there will be a statistically significant age, gender, and racial differences with respect to TBI-H, TBI-C, and TBI-M. Findings from this study can inform health policy makers and health promotion programmers to identify populations at greater risk of TBI-H and TBI-M in California. In addition, identifying sociodemographic disparities in the experience of TBI can inform practitioners, prevention planners, educators, and service sectors who aim to reduce the burden of TBI in their community.

2. Methods

2.1. Design and Study Data

This was a cross-sectional study of data obtained from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), a database that contains a summary of all the inpatient hospital discharges in California and is used for billing and payment services. For this study we used California hospital discharge data for 2001–2009 (See Figure 1). The data provided by the OSPHD includes patient demographics (age, sex, and race/ethnicity), diagnostic codes, source of payment (i.e., insurance), admission year, length of hospital stay, and disposition. All patients were eligible to be included in the study. Only patients with complete data in all the variables were included in the analysis (n = 61, 188).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Traumatic brain injury related hospitalization and mortality in california.

We used the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to identify TBI-H (Table 1). To identify TBI-M, we used ICD-10-CM. To classify TBI-C, we used CDC framework for injury categorization using E codes that are grouped into five categories: motor vehicle accidents; falls (unintentional and undetermined); assaults (including firearms and other methods); struck by and struck against (including homicide and injury purposely inflicted by another person).

Table 1.

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) for identification of TBI-H, TBI-M, and TBI-.

TBI-H TBI-M TBI-C TBI-C TBI-C TBI-C
(ICD-9-CM):
800.0–801.9,
803.0–804.9,
850.0–854.1,
950.1–950.3,
995.55, 959.01
ICD-10-CM: S01.0–S01.9,
S02.0, S02.1, S02.3, S02.7–
S02.9, S04.0, S06.0–S06.9,
S07.0, S07.1, S07.8, S07.9,
S09.7–S09.9, T01.0, T02.0,
T04.0, T06.0, T90.1, T90.2,
T90.4, T90.5, T90.8, T90.9
Motor vehicle accidents:
E810–E825,
E958.5, E968.5, and E988.5
Falls:
unintentional & undetermined:
E880–E886, E888, and E987
Assault:
including firearms & other methods:
E960–E969
E922, E955.0–CE955.4, E965.0–E965.4, E970, and E985.0–E985.4
Struck by & struck against: including homicide and injury purposely inflicted by another person: E916, E917

Age in years was included as 11 groups (0–4, 5–9, 10–14, 15–19, 20–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, and ≥75). Gender was included as male and female. Race/ethnicity variable included White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and others. Insurance variable was categorized as Medicare, Medicaid, private, worker compensation, and others. Length of hospital stay was the number of days from admission to disposition. The severity variable was developed using the aforementioned ICD-9 codes and was categorized as minor, moderate, serious, severe, and critical [6].

2.2. Date Analysis

All analyses were obtained using Statistical Analysis Software, SAS version 9.3. We used frequency (count and percentage) to depict the overall characteristics of the sample for the categorical variables (age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, length of hospital stay, and years of admission). We conducted bivariate analysis using the chi square test to determine the statistical difference in the outcome variables (TBI-H and TBI-M) by the main independent variable (TBI-C) and the other independent variables (age, gender, race/ethnicity, length of stay, severity, insurance status, and admission year). We used unadjusted logistic regressions to determine the association between each independent variable and the TBI-M. In addition, we performed multiple logistic regression to test the independent association between study predictor variables and TBI-M while controlling for the other variables in the model (i.e., age, gender, race/ethnicity, admission year, length of stay, insurance status, and severity). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented, and statistical significance is considered at P value ≤0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

The study included 61,188 hospital admissions. The average age of the population was 54.9 years, and standard deviation was 27.5 years. Table 2 illustrates that from 2001 to 2009, the percentage of TBI-H decreased from 10.3% to 8.9%, and 7.7% of patients did not survive their injuries. Our findings also show that, during 2001–2009, the leading causes of TBI-H in California were, in descending order, other causes (38.4%), falls (31.5%), and motor vehicle accidents (19.6%). The highest percentages of TBI-H occurred in those of 75 years, and older (37.2%), and nearly half of patients had Medicare (44.0%). Males had more TBI-H than females (58.9% versus 41.1%). Whites had the highest percentage of TBI-H, more than all the other racial groups combined. The average length of hospital stay was 5.9 days, the standard deviation was 9.2 days, and the median was 3 days. More than half of all admissions (57.7%) were for six days or longer. About two thirds of admissions were evaluated as serious to critical (65.1%).

Table 2.

Estimated numbers and percentages of traumatic brain injury related hospitalization in California categorized by causes, demographics, insurance, years of admission, and mortality, 2001–2009.

Patient characteristics Number (percentage)
Causes
 Motor vehicle 11996 (19.6)
 Fall 19113 (31.2)
 Assault 6291 (10.3)
 Struck by 300 (0.5)
 Other 23488 (38.4)
Age
 0–4 3910 (6.4)
 5–9 760 (1.2)
 10–14 916 (1.5)
 15–19 2986 (4.9)
 20–24 3256 (5.3)
 25–34 4319 (7.1)
 35–44 5296 (8.7)
 45–54 6580 (10.8)
 55–64 4923 (8.1)
 65–74 5488 (9.0)
 ≥75 22754 (37.2)
Gender
 Female 25159 (41.1)
 Male 36029 (58.9)
Race
 Blacks 3407 (5.6)
 Hispanics 13231 (21.6)
 Asians 3317 (5.4)
 Other 1001 (1.6)
 Whites 40232 (65.8)
Insurance
 Medicare 26942 (44.0)
 Medicaid 9556 (15.6)
 Private 13666 (22.3)
 Other 10128 (16.6)
 Workers comp 896 (1.5)
Admission year
 2001 6296 (10.3)
 2002 6740 (11.0)
 2003 7135 (11.7)
 2004 7306 (11.9)
 2005 7617 (12.5)
 2006 7589 (12.4)
 2007 7952 (13.0)
  2008 5088 (8.2)
  2009 5442 (8.9)
Length of stay
  1-2 25878 (42.3)
  3–5 16814 (27.5)
  6 or more 18496 (30.2)
Severity
  Minor 8933 (14.7)
  Moderate 12341 (20.2)
  Serious 18752 (30.7)
  Severe 19649 (32.2)
  Critical 1320 (2.2)
Mortality
 Alive 56479 (92.3)
 Died 4709 (7.7)

3.2. Factors Associated with TBI-Related Hospitalization

Table 3 presents patterns of TBI-H by external causes and demographic variables. There was a significant association between age group, gender, race, insurance and admission year, length of stay, and severity of injury and causes of TBI-H (P < 0.0001). Falls were the leading cause of TBI-H in those of 0–4 years of age (53.5%) and among females (37.2%). Motor vehicle accidents were the leading causes of hospitalization in 15–19 and 20–24 age groups (48.7% and 48.6%, resp.) and among Hispanics (27.8%). Assaults were the leading cause of TBI-H in men (15.0%) versus women (3.5%). Among Blacks, assaults were the leading cause of TBI-H (29.0%).

Table 3.

Estimated numbers and percentages of traumatic brain injury-related hospitalizations categorized by external causes and demographics, insurance, admission year, and procedure day in California, 2001–2009.

Motor vehicle Fall Assault Struck by Other P value
Age
 0–4 455 (11.6) 2093 (53.5) 322 (8.2) 82 (2.1) 958 (24.5) <0.0001
 5–9 264 (34.7) 236 (31.1) 6 (0.8) 20 (2.6) 234 (30.8)
 10–14 313 (34.2) 182 (19.9) 48 (5.2) 8 (0.9) 365 (39.9)
 15–19 1454 (48.7) 284 (9.5) 573 (19.2) 7 (0.2) 668 (22.4)
 20–24 1582 (48.6) 269 (8.3) 824 (25.3) 13 (0.4) 568 (17.4)
 25–34 1798 (41.6) 435 (10.1) 1173 (27.2) 31 (0.7) 882 (20.4)
 35–44 1688 (31.9) 794 (15.0) 1285 (24.3) 32 (0.6) 1497 (28.3)
 45–54 1631 (24.8) 1289 (19.6) 1279 (19.4) 24 (0.4) 2357 (35.8)
 55–64 994 (20.2) 1431 (29.1) 474 (9.6) 22 (0.5) 2002 (40.7)
 65–74 719 (13.1) 2081 (37.9) 140 (2.6) 21 (0.4) 2527 (46.1)
 ≥75 1098 (4.8) 10019 (44.0) 167 (0.7) 40 (0.2) 11430 (50.2)
Gender
 Female 4507 (17.9) 9356 (37.2) 872 (3.5) 94 (0.4) 10330 (41.1) <0.0001
 Male 7489 (20.8) 9757 (27.1) 5419 (15.0) 206 (0.6) 13158 (36.5)
Race
 Blacks 725 (21.3) 672 (19.7) 987 (29.0) 22 (0.7) 1001 (29.4) <0.0001
 Hispanics 3672 (27.8) 3274 (24.7) 2508 (19.0) 117 (0.9) 3660 (27.7)
 Asians 476 (14.4) 1086 (32.7) 134 (4.0) 21 (0.6) 1600 (48.2)
 Other 302 (30.2) 265 (26.5) 114 (11.4) 4 (0.4) 316 (31.6)
 Whites 6821 (17.0) 13816 (34.3) 2548 (6.3) 136 (0.3) 16911 (42.0)
Insurance
 Medicare 1582 (5.9) 11469 (42.6) 482 (1.8) 56 (0.2) 13353 (49.6) <0.0001
 Medicaid 2703 (28.3) 2374 (24.8) 1697 (17.8) 71 (0.7) 2711 (28.4)
 Private 4325 (31.7) 3498 (25.6) 1057 (7.7) 81 (0.6) 4705 (34.4)
 Other 3193 (31.5) 1403 (13.9) 3007 (29.7) 42 (0.4) 2483 (24.5)
 Workers comp 193 (21.5) 369 (41.2) 48 (5.4) 50 (5.6) 236 (26.3)
Length of stay
 1-2 5584 (46.6) 8200 (42.9) 3320 (52.8) 159 (53) 8615 (36.7) <0.001
 3–5 2595 (21.6) 5679 (29.7) 1402 (22.3) 68 (22.7) 7070 (30.1)
 6 or more 3817 (31.8) 5234 (27.4) 1569 (24.9) 73 (24.3) 7803 (33.2)
Severity
 Minor 2162 (18.0) 2612 (13.7) 1159 (18.9) 51 (17.0) 2949 (12.6) <0.0001
 Moderate 3746 (31.2) 3641 (19.1) 1279 (20.8) 96 (32.0) 3579 (15.3)
 Serious 4108 (34.2) 5869 (30.7) 2209 (36.0) 104 (34.7) 6462 (27.6)
 Severe 1749 (14.6) 6701 (35.1) 1296 (21.1) 47 (15.7) 9856 (42.0)
 Critical 231 (1.9) 287 (1.5) 201 (3.3) 2 (0.7) 599 (2.5)
Admission year
 2001 1398 (22.2) 2859 (45.4) 662 (10.5) 42 (0.7) 1335 (21.2) <0.0001
 2002 1484 (22.0) 1977 (29.3) 720 (10.7) 32 (0.5) 2527 (37.5)
 2003 1571 (22.0) 2158 (30.3) 682 (9.6) 38 (0.5) 2686 (38.7)
 2004 1575 (21.6) 2133 (29.2) 725 (9.9) 29 (0.4) 2844 (38.9)
 2005 1418 (18.6) 2137 (28.1) 865 (11.4) 40 (0.5) 3157 (41.5)
 2006 1460 (19.2) 2275 (30.0) 795 (10.5) 47 (0.6) 3012 (39.7)
 2007 1334 (16.8) 2433 (30.6) 774 (9.7) 26 (0.3) 3385 (42.6)
 2008 884 (17.4) 1494 (29.4) 499 (9.8) 27 (0.5) 2184 (42.9)
 2009 869 (16.0) 1640 (30.1) 568 (10.4) 19 (0.4) 2346 (43.1)

3.3. Factors Associated with TBI-Related Mortality

Table 4 presents mortality percentages as well as unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of TBI-M in California from 2001 to 2009. Mortality increased from 6.9% in 2001 to 8.2% in 2009. Mortality was higher among those who suffered an assault, among those of 75 years age and older, males, Whites, and those who had serious to critical injuries. After adjusting for other independent variables, patients were more likely to die from TBI caused by motor vehicle accidents compared to those who were “struck by” (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.14–1.41; P < 0.0001). Also, those of age ≥75 (AOR = 6.4, 95% CI = 4.9–8.4; P < 0.0001) and patients with Medicare (AOR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.32–1.75; P < 0.0001) had higher odds of dying from TBI compared to other groups. Males were more likely to die from TBI compared to females (AOR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.27–1.46, P < 0.0001). Blacks suffered higher mortality compared to Whites, but this was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.945–1.285, P < 0.22).

Table 4.

Estimated number, percentages, unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval of traumatic brain injury related mortality in California, 2001–2009.

Mortality Unadjusted Adjusted
Died Alive Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI
Causes
 Motor v. accident 726 (6.1) 11270 (93.9) 0.612 0.561–0.667 1.270 1.140–1.415
 Fall 1342 (7.0) 17771 (93.0) 0.717 0.669–0.770 0.775 0.716–0.839
 Assault 397 (6.3) 5894 (93.7) 0.640 0.573–0.715 0.816 0.706–0.943
 Other 2237 (9.5) 21251 (90.5) 0.227 0.107–0.481 0.510 0.232–1.121
 Struck by 7 (2.3) 293 (97.7) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Age
 0–4 93 (2.4) 3817 (97.6) 0.199 0.162–0.246 0.156 0.119–0.204
 5–9 16 (2.1) 744 (97.9) 0.176 0.107–0.289 0.147 0.086–0.253
 10–14 19 (2.1) 897 (97.9) 0.173 0.110–0.273 0.121 0.073–0.198
 15–19 198 (6.6) 2788 (93.4) 0.581 0.500–0.675 0.415 0.336–0.512
 20–24 201 (6.2) 3055 (93.8) 0.538 0.464–0.624 0.420 0.340–0.518
 25–34 198 (4.6) 4121 (95.4) 0.393 0.339–0.456 0.333 0.271–0.409
 35–44 260 (4.9) 5036 (95.1) 0.422 0.370–0.482 0.398 0.331–0.478
 45–54 413 (6.3) 6167 (93.7) 0.548 0.492–0.610 0.461 0.395–0.540
 55–64 385 (7.8) 4538 (92.2) 0.694 0.620–0.776 0.625 0.538–0.726
 65–74 447 (8.2) 5041 (91.8) 0.725 0.653–0.806 0.627 0.558–0.704
 ≥75 2479 (10.9) 20275 (89.1) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Gender
 Female 1772 (7.0) 23387 (93.0) Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Male 2937 (8.2) 33092 (91.8) 1.171
1.102–1.245
1.36
1.27–1.46
Race
 Blacks 253 (7.4) 3154 (92.6) 0.879 0.769–1.003 1.102 0.945–1.285
 Hispanics 777 (5.9) 12454 (94.1) 0.683 0.630–0.741 0.891 0.805–0.985
 Asians 269 (8.1) 3048 (91.9) 0.967 0.849–1.100 0.793 0.689–0.912
 Other 44 (4.4) 957 (95.6) 0.504 0.371–0.683 0.723 0.516–1.015
 Whites 3366 (8.4) 36866 (91.6) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Insurance
 Medicare 2749 (10.2) 24193 (89.8) Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Medicaid 723 (7.6) 8833 (92.4) 0.720 0.661–0.784 1.518 1.318–1.748
 Private 703 (5.1) 12963 (94.9) 0.477 0.438–0.520 0.767 0.677–0.869
 Other 488 (4.8) 9640 (95.2) 0.446 0.403–0.492 0.827 0.707–0.966
 Workers comp 46 (5.1) 850 (94.9) 0.476 0.353–0.642 0.848 0.604–1.192
Severity
  Minor 40 (0.4) 8893 (99.6) Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Moderate 117 (0.9) 12224 (99.1) 2.128 1.485–3.050 2.561 1.785–3.67
  Serious 1639 (8.7) 17113 (91.3) 21.29 15.54–29.17 30.652 22.34–42.06
  Severe 1991 (10.1) 17658 (89.9) 25.07 18.31– 34.32 31.456 22.9–43.18
  Critical 902 (68.3) 418 (31.7) 479.75 344.37–668.34 655.24 468.13–917.15
Length of stay
  1-2 2338 (49.7) 23540 (41.7) Reference Reference Reference Reference
  3–5 898 (19.1) 15916 (28.2) 0.568 0.525–0.615 0.320 0.293–0.349
 6 or more 1473 (31.3) 17023 (30.1) 0.871 0.814–0.933 0.379 0.351–0.410
Admission yr.
 2001 435 (6.9) 5861 (93.1) Reference Reference Reference Reference
 2002 479 (7.1) 6261 (92.9) 1.031 0.901–1.179 0.969 0.832–1.129
 2003 515 (7.2) 6620 (92.8) 1.048 0.918–1.197 1.014 0.873–1.177
 2004 554 (7.6) 6752 (92.4) 1.106 0.970–1.259 1.028 0.887–1.191
 2005 594 (7.8) 7023 (92.2) 1.140 1.002–1.296 0.940 0.813–1.087
 2006 575 (7.6) 7014 (92.4) 1.105 0.971–1.257 0.970 0.839–1.121
 2007 638 (8.0) 7337 (92.0) 1.172 1.032–1.330 0.949 0.823–1.094
 2008 475 (9.3) 4613 (90.7) 1.387 1.211–1.589 1.209 1.038–1.408
 2009 444 (8.2) 4998 (91.8) 1.197 1.043–1.373 1.010 0.866–1.178

4. Discussion

In this study, we identified trends as well as sociodemographic factors and causes of injuries related to TBI hospitalization and mortality. Our findings show that, from 2001 to 2009, the percentage of TBI-H in California decreased while mortality from such injuries increased. The lower percentage of TBI-H suggests that those with critical injuries may succumb before reaching a hospital, due to the lack of transportation or accessibility to adequate care, for example, living at a great distance away. In Trunkey and Blaisdel's “trimodel distribution of trauma deaths,” they refer to this as prehospital deaths [7]. Alternatively, the difference may simply reflect improved, pre-hospital care in California. Future studies can elucidate underlying mechanisms and remediable causes and treat them by the most effective interventions.

We found an increasing trend in TBI-M in our study. This may reflect the loss of the proverbial “golden hour” of trauma care in California that could increase early hospital deaths. It may also suggest “late deaths” due to trauma-related complications such as sepsis [7]. Faul et al. showed that the percentage of TBI-M in United States increased by 3.5%, during 2002–2006 [3]. However, the observed differences could be due to variations in the age distribution of our study population and causes of TBI. For example, our study consisted of 37.2% age ≥75 years, compared to 22% in Faul et al., and included higher percentages of falls and assaults.

Our findings suggest a high burden of TBI in California, which can lead to substantial long-term cognitive, emotional, and functional disability [8]. It is estimated that 124,000 persons discharged from TBI-related hospitalization developed TBI-related disability one year after the injury [6]. In a 2005 study by Zaloshnja et al., it was estimated that 3.2 million Americans were living with TBI-related long-term disability. Approximately half of these individuals were of ages of 40–49 years old, and 25% were those ≥70 years of age [9]. Our findings suggest the need for quality assessment of TBI-related care in California that will identify areas for tertiary prevention of trauma deaths.

Our findings also show that, in California, the highest percentages of TBI-H were in those of ≥75 years of age, males, Whites, and those who had Medicare coverage. In regard to TBI-M, it was more likely to occur in those of ≥75 years age, male, and those with Medicaid. These findings are similar to previous national studies of TBI [1014]. For example in 2003, Rutland-Brown et al. showed that those of 65 years of age and older had the highest rates of TBI-related hospitalizations and mortality (234.1 per 100,000 and 38.4 per 100,000, resp.) [2]. With the steady increase in the population of those 65 and older, it seems there is a need to reduce the burden of unintentional falls and motor vehicle-related accidents in this subpopulation [15, 16]. Specifically, primary care providers and emergency physicians are in the unique position of being able to inform elderly individuals and their caregivers of risks associated with fall injuries and motor vehicle crashes. Moreover, evidence-based preventions, which are cost effective and focus on environmental modifications to reduce the risk of unintentional fall in this population, as well as their susceptibility to injury in motor vehicle crashes, are needed [15, 17].

The higher TBI hospitalizations and mortality among male relative to female had been reported in previous studies [3, 5, 14, 1820]. For example, from 1980 to 1995, the average rate of TBI-related hospitalizations was 1.8 times higher in male than female. In 1994, male death rates were 3.3 times higher than females [21], Fall-related TBI deaths were about 3 times higher in males than females (3.2 versus 1.3 per 100,000), and motor vehicle-traffic related TBI deaths were about 2 times higher in males than females (9.9 versus 4.3 per 100,000) during 1989–1998 [22]. Although reasons for differences in males and females remain unclear, previous research suggested differences in physiological responses and lifestyle-related behaviors [8, 19, 20].

Our data showed that Blacks had higher adjusted odds of mortality relative to Whites, but it was not statistically significant. Different from our findings, others have reported racial differences in the incidence of TBI-related hospitalizations and mortality. For example, TBI data from the United States for 1995–2001 identifies that both Blacks and American Indians/Alaska natives as the groups with the highest TBI-related hospitalizations [23, 24]. Also, TBI-related death rates for 1994 were high among Blacks (25.5 per 100,000) than Whites (19 per 100,000) [1]. Data from 1995 to 2001 also point out Blacks as the highest risk group for TBI-associated death [24, 25]. These findings are similar to findings also reported from the IMPACT study [26]. Others have shown that Asian had higher mortality compared to Whites [20, 27, 28]. Differences could be due to the effect of injury on mortality. In one study, excluding cases of assaults resulted in a significant increase of mortality in Asians compared to Whites, suggesting that assaults may have an effect on mortality [28]. In our study, we found that assaults were the leading cause of TBI in Blacks, a finding that was noted in the IMPACT study [26]. A high percentage of assault-related injuries in Blacks emphasize the need to strengthen community-based primary prevention programs as well as clinical prevention services in the community for this group.

According to this California discharge data, falls were the leading cause of TBI-H in those of ages of 0–4 years old and ≥75 years age group, for males and females, as well as Whites and Asians. Findings of studies that examined TBI-H in children are consistent with ours; that is, falls were the leading causes of hospitalizations in children of 0–4 years old [23, 29, 30]. We did not examine the causes of falls among this age group in our study since it was not in the scope of our aims, but previous findings show that the leading causes of falls in infants are falling from bed, stairs, furniture, and chair [30]. Also, for the older age group, others have found that those in the ≥75 years of age group are more subject to falls [2, 16, 30], which is consistent with our data showing a higher percentage of TBI-H caused by falls in those of age ≥75 years old.

Although this study provides a population based analysis of TBI for California, it presents some limitations. More specifically, missing data limited our ability to generalize the findings to the general population. For example, OSPHD does not include data from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Also, to protect the identity of individual patients, OSHPD masks some data elements for some encounters. Masking affects age, sex, race, ethnicity, and zip code to varying degrees. Additionally, our numbers do not include patients who were seen in the emergency department or who did not receive injury related care, therefore leading to possible underestimation of the overall percentage of TBI. Also this study focused on aggregated falls and did not count for possible differences in the presentation of individual types of falls. Finally, as helpful as ICD-9 code data are for identifying burden of injury and its causal factors, its use as a research tool is limited due to its potential for missing data. This could significantly impact research outcomes [31]. In our study, however, we did not have any missing ICD codes for the primary diagnosis in the total sample because we selected the sample based on the identifying of ICD-9 codes.

5. Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate the recent trends of risk factors in TBI in California, showing a decrease in TBI-H over the years. They also depict an increase in the percentage of TBI-M during the same period, suggesting that TBI mortality remains a public health challenge in California. In terms of preventing acute, early, and late TBI-related deaths, our findings suggest the need for early identification of potentially fatal TBI injuries. From a primary prevention perspective, our findings also highlight the need for programs geared specifically toward falls, assaults, and motor vehicle accident-related injuries.

In addition, our results suggest differences in demographic factors associated with TBI hospitalizations and mortality in California. These include younger children, older adults, and females, who were at higher risk for fall-related TBIs; younger adults, elderly, and Hispanics, who were at higher risks for motor vehicle accidents-related TBIs; and males and Blacks who had higher risks for assault-related TBIs. Targeted injury preventative strategies for different subgroups are needed to focus on their specific risk for TBI and their common risky behavioral practices [16, 3234]. Further research is required to determine factors associated with TBI-related emergency department visits and post-TBI hospitalization outcome in California.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material: STROBE 2007 (v4) Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Endowment Grant S21MD000103 and by the Accelerating Excellence in Translational Science AXIS Grant (U54MD007598) and NIH/NCRRN/NCATS UCLA CTSI Grant UL1TR000124.

Abbreviations

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

TBI-H:

Traumatic brain injury related hospitalization

TBI-C:

Traumatic brain injury related causes

TBI-M:

Traumatic brain injury related mortality

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

OSHPD:

Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development

ICD-9-CM:

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification

ICD-1-CM:

International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification.

References

  • 1.Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Dunn KA, Guerrero J, Sniezek JE. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 1999;14(6):602–615. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199912000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rutland-Brown W, Langlois JA, Thomas KE, Xi YL. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2006;21(6):544–548. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200611000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Faul MXL, Wald MM, Coronado V. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations and Deaths, 2002–2006. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Finkelstein E, Corso P, Miller T. the Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Incidence rates of hospitalization related to traumatic brain injury—12 states. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2006;55(8):201–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.David Clark E. ICDPIC Version 3.0; ICD-9-CM Trauma within STATA version 11.2.
  • 7.Meislin H, Criss EA, Judkins D, et al. Fatal trauma: the modal distribution of time to death is a function of patient demographics and regional resources. Journal of Trauma—Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1997;43(3):433–440. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199709000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gujral IB, Stallones L, Gabella BA, Keefe TJ, Chen P. Sex differences in mortality after traumatic brain injury, Colorado 1994–1998. Brain Injury. 2006;20(3):283–291. doi: 10.1080/02699050500488058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Langlois JA, Selassie AW. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic Brain Injury in the civilian population of the United Statet 2005. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2008;23(6):394–400. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000341435.52004.ac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ellis AA, Trent RB. Do the risks and consequences of hospitalized fall injuries among older adults in California vary by type of fall? Journals of Gerontology A. 2001;56(11):M686–M692. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.11.m686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nonfatal fall-related traumatic brain injury among older adults—California, 1996—1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003;52:276–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flaada JT, Leibson CL, Mamdrekar JN, et al. Relative risk of mortality after traumatic brain injury: a population-based study of the role of age and injury severity. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2007;24(3):435–445. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thomas KE, Stevens JA, Sarmiento K, Wald MM. Fall-related traumatic brain injury deaths and hospitalizations among older adults—United States, 2005. Journal of Safety Research. 2008;39(3):269–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for traumatic brain injury-related deaths—United Sates, 1997–2007. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Review. 2011:1–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lyman S, Ferguson SA, Braver ER, Williams AF. Older driver involvements in police reported crashes and fatal crashes: trends and projections. Injury Prevention. 2002;8(2):116–120. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.2.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rosen T, Mack KA, Noonan RK. Slipping and tripping: fall injuries in adults associated with rugs and carpets. Journal of Injury & Violence Research. 2013;5:61–69. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rosen T, Mack KA, Noonan R. Slipping and tripping: fall injuries in adults associated with rugs and carpets. Journal of Injury & Violence Research. 2013;5(1):61–69. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Givens JL, Tjia J. Depressed medical students’ use of mental health services and barriers to use. Academic Medicine. 2002;77(9):918–921. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ottochian M, Salim A, Berry C, Chan LS, Wilson MT, Margulies DR. Severe traumatic brain injury: is there a gender difference in mortality? American Journal of Surgery. 2009;197(2):155–158. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berry C, Ley EJ, Mirocha J, Salim A. Race affects mortality after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Surgical Research. 2010;163(2):303–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thurman D, Guerrero J. Trends in hospitalization associated with traumatic brain injury. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282(10):954–957. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.10.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for traumatic brain injury deaths—United States, 1989–1998. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Review. 2002;51(10):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE. The incidence of traumatic brain injury among children in the United States: differences by race. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2005;20(3):229–238. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200505000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JA. The epidemiologyo of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2010;25(2):72–80. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181ccc8b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Langlois JA, R-BW TK National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. US Department Health and Human Services CfDCaP. Atlanta, Ga, USA: 2004. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mushkudiani NA, Engel DC, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):259–269. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bowman SM, Martin DP, Sharar SR, Zimmerman FJ. Racial disparities in outcomes of persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Medical Care. 2007;45(7):686–690. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803dcdf3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sorani MD, Lee M, Kim H, Meeker M, Manley GT. Race/ethnicity and outcome after traumatic brain injury at a single, diverse center. Journal of Trauma—Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2009;67(1):75–80. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818234e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bowman SM, Bird TM, Aitken ME, Tilford JM. Trends in hospitalizations associated with pediatric traumatic brain injuries. Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):988–993. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shi J, Xiang H, Wheeler K, et al. Costs, mortality likelihood and outcomes of hospitalized US children with traumatic brain injuries. Brain Injury. 2009;23(7-8):602–611. doi: 10.1080/02699050903014907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Robertson BD, McConnel C, Green S. Charges associated with pediatric head injuries: a five-year retrospective review of 41 pediatric hospitals in the US. Journal of Injury and Violence Research. 2013;5, article 51 doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beiki O, Karimi N, Mohammadi R. Parental educational level and injury incidence and mortality among foreign-born children: a cohort study with 46 years follow-up. Journal of Injury & Violence Research. 2013 doi: 10.5249/jivr.v6i1.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li S, Tang Z, Zhang X, et al. Epidemiologic features of child unintentional injury in rural PuCheng, China. Journal of Injury & Violence Research. 2013;5:89–94. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i2.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kalaiselvan G, Dongre AR, Mahalakshmy T. Epidemiology of injury in rural Pondicherry, India. Journal of Injury & Violence Research. 2011;3(2):62–67. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v3i2.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material: STROBE 2007 (v4) Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies.


Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES