Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nurs Outlook. 2011 Jul-Aug;59(4):10.1016/j.outlook.2011.05.010. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.05.010

Conservative Interventions for Urinary Incontinence in Frail Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Literature Review

Kristine MC Talley 1, Jean F Wyman 1, Tatyana A Shamliyan 2
PMCID: PMC3846433  NIHMSID: NIHMS456039  PMID: 21757078

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review aimed to identify conservative interventions for reducing urinary incontinence (UI) in non-institutionalized frail older adults.

METHOD

Randomized and quasi-experimental studies published in English reporting outcomes on UI frequency, severity, or quality of life were included and rated for quality. Studies reporting improvements over 50% in UI outcomes were considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 683 participants (75% female) were eligible. Multicomponent behavioral interventions including pelvic floor muscle exercises and bladder training had the strongest evidence for reducing UI. There was limited evidence that suggested that comprehensive geriatric assessment with multicomponent behavioral interventions, pattern urge response training, and toilet skills training may be beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to derive firm conclusions regarding the use of conservative interventions. Clinical trials are needed on a variety of interventions to guide practice on UI prevention and management in frail community-dwelling older adults.

Problem Statement and Purpose

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a costly condition impacting many older adults. It affects more women, and becomes more common with advancing age and with increasing frailty. For community-dwelling adults age 65 years and older, approximately 44% of women and 29% of men have UI. These percentages increase to 57% for women and 43% for men age 80+. Nursing home residents experience more UI than independently living older adults with prevalence ranging from 60-78% for women and 23-72% for men.1 It affects more than half of older homebound adults,2 home-health care recipients,3, 4 and adult daycare participants.5 In 2000, it cost over $14 billion dollars to manage UI in the community and $5 billion in nursing homes exceeding the cost of treating pneumonia, influenza, and breast cancer.6

UI treatments in frail older adults require special consideration because UI is more likely to develop from the interaction of age related changes in the urological system, co-morbidity, declining physical and cognitive function, and environmental barriers.1 Since many frail adults can not tolerate antimuscarinic medications and surgical interventions, treatment starts with conservative behavioral and lifestyle interventions.7 Pelvic floor muscle exercises8 improve UI in independently living older adults and habit training,9 timed10 and prompted voiding11, 12 improve UI in nursing home residents.

There are few clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of UI in frail older adults. Most are written for the general adult population and are becoming outdated. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has not updated their guidelines since 1996.13 The International Consultation on Incontinence7, 14, 15 has the most current and comprehensive guidelines, yet most of their recommendations are based on frail older adults living in nursing homes and it is unclear how these could be implemented in settings where nursing support is not available 24 hours a day. Given the difference in nursing resources available between settings, understanding which interventions are effective outside of the nursing home will help develop programs to prevent or delay nursing home placement triggered by UI. Therefore, the purposes of this paper were to identify conservative interventions effective at preventing or managing UI in frail older adults who do not live in nursing homes, to rate the quality of this evidence, and to identify clinical guidelines to guide practice.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the literature performed in 2007 was updated and experimental and quasi-experimental studies on conservative (non-drug and non-surgical) treatments of UI for frail older adults identified.1 PubMed was searched using the MESH terms “urinary incontinence/epidemiology,” “urinary incontinence/prevention and control,” and “urinary incontinence/rehabilitation.” The search was limited to English language journal articles published between 1965 and 2010 with participants age 65 years and older. All abstracts were dually screened for eligibility. The Cochrane Database and National Guideline Clearing House were searched for practice guidelines using the term “urinary incontinence.”

Eligible studies reported outcomes on UI frequency, volume, severity, or quality of life (QOL) in samples including non-institutionalized frail adults age ≥60 years. Frail was defined as having functional impairments, being homebound, or requiring assistance with daily activities. Studies enrolling only participants with a specific disease (e.g., Parkinson’s) were excluded. To be consistent with current recommendations for conducting research with frail older adults, samples with significant cognitive impairment were excluded because they pose methodological challenges that are specifically addressed in the dementia literature.16 Samples had significant cognitive impairment if the mean score on standardized screening tests equaled diagnostic thresholds or more than one-third of participants had dementia. The heterogeneity of the interventions and study outcomes precluded meta-analysis to pool efficacy results; therefore a narrative review was undertaken. Studies reporting statistically significant improvements greater than 50% in UI outcomes were considered to have clinically significant findings.17, 18 The US Preventative Services Task Force evidence stratification system was used to assess study quality because it provides criteria for rating the internal and external validity of intervention trials.19 A table summarizing the quality of eligible studies is available on-line.

Results

Interventions

Seven studies including 683 participants were eligible. Figure 1 identifies the reasons for exclusion. Table 1 summarizes the study characteristics and findings. There were three randomized controlled trials20, 21, 22 and four quasi-experimental studies.23-26 Five studies targeted multicomponent behavioral strategies including: pelvic floor muscle exercises (with20 and without23-26 biofeedback assistance), bladder training,20, 22-25 modification of caffeine and fluid intake,23-26 constipation management,23, 26 and strategies to suppress urgency and stress symptoms.20,23, 24 One study investigated comprehensive geriatric assessments26 and another focused on improving toileting skills.21 The interventions were provided by nurses, physical and occupational therapists, physicians, and interdisciplinary teams. Most providers were nurses.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of Articles Identified in the Literature Search and Reasons for Exclusion

Table 1.

Summary of Study Characteristics, Intervention Components and Urinary Incontinence(UI) Outcome by Setting

Study and Intervention Design Sample
Characteristics
Frail Definition and
Level of Cognitive
Impairment
Urinary Incontinence
Outcome
Level of
Evidence*
HOMEBOUND
McDowell 199920
Biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle
exercises, urge and stress suppression, bladder
training for 8 weeks vs. social interaction
Randomized
controlled trial
with delayed-
treatment group
N=105
91% women
77 mean age
Homebound
Mini Mental Status Exam
Score ≥ 24
75% (p< .001) improvement
in daily episodes per diary
Level I
Rose 199023
Pelvic floor muscle exercise, habit training,
biofeedback, relaxation exercises, diet
modification, and bowel regimens for 4 weeks
Single group
pre/post test
N=39
85% women
77 mean age
Homebound
Adequate cognitive
capability to implement
behavior change
78% (p<.02) and 79%
(p<.0005) improvement in
weekly episodes per diary
Level II-3
Karon 200525
Individualized bladder training, pelvic floor
muscle exercises, education on adequate
hydration and caffeine reduction for 3 months
Single group
pre/post test
N=50
68% women
68 mean age
Homebound
Adequate cognitive
capability to implement
behavior change
79-80% (p< .001)
improvement in daily
episodes per diary
Level II-3
Harari 200926
Comprehensive geriatric assessment, pelvic
floor muscle exercises, bladder training,
caffeine reduction, fluid consumption,
prompted voiding, chronic disease
management for 6 weeks
Single group
pre/post test
N=112
78% women
80 mean age
Homebound
33% of participants had
dementia diagnosis or
Abbreviated mental test
score ≤7/10
23% reported UI resolved
44% reported UI improved
30% reported UI unchanged
3% reported UI worse
Level III
ASSISTED LIVING & SENIOR APARTMENTS
Schrim 200424
1-hour group education with optional
individualized treatment
Single group
post test
N=180
85% women
47-100 age
range
Adults living in independent
& assisted living facilities
Cognitive function not reported
30-33% reported
improvement
Level II-3
ADULT DAY CARE & HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY**
van Houten 200721
Toilet skills training for 8 weeks vs. no
treatment control
Randomized
controlled trial
N=57
100% women
83 mean age
Mild/moderate impairment
on performance oriented
timed toileting instrument
No evident dementia
24 hour pad test improved
8% (p=.07) 24 hours
22% (p=.47) daytime
35% (p=.15) nighttime
Level I
COMMUNITY DWELLING FRAIL
Colling 200322
Pattern Urge Response Training for 6 weeks
Randomized
controlled trial
with delayed-
treatment group
N=78
81% women
76 mean age
Requires assistance with 2+
activities of daily living
Mean Short Portable Mini-
mental status Questionnaire
score = 2.4
18% (p≤.02) improvement in
UI episodes over 24 hours
39% (p≤.04) improvement in
UI volume over 24 hours
Level I
*

Level I evidence from properly designed randomized controlled trial; Level II-1 evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization; Level II-2 evidence from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies; Level II-3 evidence from multiple time series with or without the intervention; Level III opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.19

**

Sample included combination of adult day care participants, residents of homes for the elderly and nursing homes.

Three multicomponent behavioral studies including pelvic floor muscle exercises and bladder training found similar significant improvements of 75-80% in UI episodes in homebound older adults.20, 23, 25 Only one of these three studies was a randomized controlled trial providing Level I support for a home-based nurse practitioner delivered intervention combining biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle exercise, bladder training, urge and stress suppression, and management of modifiable health conditions and environmental barriers.20 The other two studies followed a single group over time and provided level II-3 support for multi-component interventions provided by home health care nurses23 and for the A+ Links Bladder Retraining program provided by continence nurse specialists and physical therapists.25 The study investigating the A+ Links Bladder Retraining program was the only one to examine QOL reporting improvements ranging from 9-19% (p<.0001).25 A fourth study with a weak design did not support a clinically significant change in UI (Level III). In this study only 30-35% of participants in a 1-hour group education program with optional individualized assessments reported improvements in urgency, emptying their bladders, control of sudden leakage, decreased UI and fewer trips to the toilet.24

One study found that combining multicomponent behavioral strategies with comprehensive geriatric assessments performed by an interdisciplinary care team in a clinic setting resulted in 67% of their 112 homebound patients reporting improved or resolved UI at program end.26 The interdisciplinary care team consisted of a continence nurse specialist, consultant geriatrician and physician and registered nurse trainees.

One randomized controlled trial of an 8 week physical and occupational therapy toileting skills program resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease of 8-38% in UI volume as measured by pad tests (Level I). However, there was a trend toward improvements in daytime (p=.05) and nighttime toileting skills (p=.06).21

Pattern Urge-Response Toileting (PURT) a type of habit training was taught to participants or participant caregivers and reduced the number of incontinent episodes over 24 hours by 18% (mean number of episode decreased from 4.9 to 4.0, p<.02) and reduced the volume of UI over 24 hours by 39% (mean volume decreased was 188 mls, p<.04).22

Clinical Guidelines

Only two clinical practice guidelines from the International Continence Society’s (ICS) Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence7, 14, 15 and Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE)27, 28 included recommendations specific to frail older adults. Both guidelines recommend addressing the multiple factors that contribute to UI in frail older adults. Assessment starts with identifying the type, frequency, amount, and timing of UI (a bladder diary can be used). Treatment considerations include: level of cognitive and functional abilities, degree of bother in implementing the treatment for both the older adult and their caregiver, goals for care, cooperation, overall prognosis, and life expectancy. Behavioral strategies should be attempted first and be combined with comorbid disease and medication management, optimization of functional limitations, and environmental modification.

Discussion

There is scant literature with low levels of evidence to guide UI management in frail older adults not living in a nursing home. No studies investigated prevention of UI and only one included QOL as an outcome. Multicomponent behavioral interventions including pelvic floor muscle exercises and bladder training had the strongest evidence for improving UI frequency.20, 23, 25 However, only one study provided the highest level of support for these interventions.20 Comprehensive geriatric assessments combined with multi-component behavioral interventions resulted in a majority of participants reporting improved or resolved UI, but determining if they had clinically significant improvements was not possible because UI frequency and severity were measured with categorical variables. Habit training with or without caregiver assistance and toileting skills training resulted in modest reductions in UI that were either not statistically or deemed clinically significant.17, 18

Despite clinical guideline recommendations, none of the studies included interventions to improve functional impairments. Since functional impairments with gait speed, balance, and leg strength have been associated with UI in frail older adults,29 interventions targeting functional impairment may optimize continence status. Functional incident training which combines mobility and transfer training with prompted voiding has reduced UI in nursing home residents.30, 31 Programs combining physical activity and conservative continence treatments should be tested outside the nursing home setting.

Limitations with the studies in this review include inconsistent definitions of frailty and variable measures of UI. Future research should use standardized measures of frailty and UI. The International Consultation on Incontinence7 recommends using the Vulnerable Elders Survey to measure frailty.32 Other frailty instruments measuring accumulation of deficits,33 and the frailty phenotype34 are also available. Standardized measures of UI should include severity, patient goals and preference, condition-specific QOL, and economic considerations.6

In conclusion, there is need for more randomized clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of conservative treatments to guide clinical practice in the prevention and management of UI in frail older adults. This need is especially critical given the rapidly aging population who face a high risk of UI with its associated psychosocial and economic burdens.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Talley was a JAHF and Atlantic Philanthropies Claire M. Fagin Fellow and her work was supported by the John A. Hartford Foundation’s Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity Award Program.

References

  • 1.Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Bliss DZ, Kane RL, Wilt TJ. Prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence in adults. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2007;161:1–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDowell BJ, Engberg SJ, Rodriguez E, Engberg R, Sereika S. Characteristics of urinary incontinence in homebound older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:963–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Landi F, Cesari M, Russo A, Onder G, Lattanzio F, Bernabei R. Potentially reversible risk factors and urinary incontinence in frail older people living in community. Age Ageing. 2003;32:194–9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Du Moulin MF, Hamers JP, Ambergen AW, Janssen MA, Halfens RJ. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among community-dwelling adults receiving home care. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31:604–12. doi: 10.1002/nur.20291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takazawa K, Arisawa K. Relationship between the type of urinary incontinence and falls among frail elderly women in Japan. J Med Invest. 2005;52:165–71. doi: 10.2152/jmi.52.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Landefeld CS, Bowers BJ, Feld AD, Hartmann KE, Hoffman E, Ingber MJ, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: prevention of fecal and urinary incontinence in adults. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:449–58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DuBeau CE, Kuchel GA, Johnson T, Palmer MH, Wagg A. Incontinence in the frail elderly: report from the 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:165–78. doi: 10.1002/nau.20842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD005654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ostaszkiewicz J, Johnston L, Roe B. Habit retraining for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD002801. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002801.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ostaszkiewicz J, Johnston L, Roe B. Timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1:CD002802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002802.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eustice S, Roe B, Paterson J. Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD002113. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario . Promoting continence using prompted voiding. (Revised) Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; Toronto, Canada: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J, et al. Quick reference guide for clinicians. 2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; Rockville, MD: Jan, 1996. Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence. Clinical practice guideline. 1996 Update. AHCPR Pub. No. 96-0686. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:213–40. doi: 10.1002/nau.20870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schröder A, Abrams P, Andersson KE, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Drake MJ, et al. Guidelines on urinary incontinence. European Association of Urology; Arnhem, The Netherlands: [accessed May 5, 2011]. 2009. Urinary incontinence in frail/older men and women; pp. 44–51. http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=14819&search=urinary+incontinence. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S, Fried LP, Cutler GB, Walston JD, et al. Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:625–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yalcin I, Peng G, Viktrup L, Bump RC. Reductions in stress urinary incontinence episodes: what is clinically important for women? Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Mar;29:344–7. doi: 10.1002/nau.20744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Burgio KL, Goode PS, Richter HE, Locher JL, Roth DL. Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perceptions of improvement with treatment for urinary incontinence: validation of three global patient ratings. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:411–7. doi: 10.1002/nau.20243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. [accessed May 5, 2011];U.S. preventive services task force procedure manual [Internet] 2008 Jul; AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/methods/procmanual4.htm.
  • 20.McDowell BJ, Engberg S, Sereika S, Donovan N, Jubeck ME, Weber E, et al. Effectiveness of behavioral therapy to treat incontinence in homebound older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Mar;47:309–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Houten P, Achterberg W, Ribbe M. Urinary incontinence in disabled elderly women: a randomized clinical trial on the effect of training mobility and toileting skills to achieve independent toileting. Gerontology. 2007;53:205–10. doi: 10.1159/000100544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Colling J, Owen TR, McCreedy M, Newman D. The effects of a continence program on frail community-dwelling elderly persons. Urol Nurs. 2003 Apr;23:117–22. 127–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rose MA, Baigis-Smith J, Smith D, Newman D. Behavioral management of urinary incontinence in homebound older adults. Home Healthc Nurse. 1990;8:10–5. doi: 10.1097/00004045-199009000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schirm V, Baumgardner J, Dowd T, Gregor S, Kolcaba K. Development of a healthy bladder education program for older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2004;25:301–6. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Karon S. A team approach to bladder retraining: a pilot study. Urol Nurs. 2005;25:269–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Harari D, Igbedioh C. Restoring continence in frail older people living in the community: what factors influence successful treatment outcomes? Age Ageing. 2009;38:228–33. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fung CH, Spencer B, Eslami M, Crandall C. Quality indicators for the screening and care of urinary incontinence in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(Suppl 2):S443–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schnelle JF, Smith RL. Quality indicators for the management of urinary incontinence in vulnerable community-dwelling elders. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:752–8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_2-200110161-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miles TP, Palmer RF, Espino DV, Mouton CP, Lichtenstein MJ, Markides KS. New-onset incontinence and markers of frailty: data from the Hispanic established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M19–24. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.1.m19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schnelle JF, Alessi CA, Simmons SF, Al-Samarrai NR, Beck JC, Ouslander JG. Translating clinical research into practice: a randomized controlled trial of exercise and incontinence care with nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1476–83. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ouslander JG, Griffiths PC, McConnell E, Riolo L, Kutner M, Schnelle J. Functional incidental training: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial in veterans affairs nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1091–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ, Solomon DH, Young RT, Kamberg CJ, et al. The vulnerable elders survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1691–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:738–43. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES