Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9793–9798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9793

Irreversibility of cellular aging and neoplastic transformation: a clonal analysis.

M Chow 1, H Rubin 1
PMCID: PMC38508  PMID: 8790410

Abstract

Prolonged incubation of NIH 3T3 cells under the growth constraint of confluence results in a persistent impairment of proliferation when the cells are subcultured at low density and a greatly increased probability of neoplastic transformation in assays for transformation. These properties, along with the large accumulation of age pigment bodies in the confluent cells, are cardinal cellular characteristics of aging in organisms and validate the system as a model of cellular aging. Two cultures labeled alpha and beta were obtained after prolonged confluence; both were dominated by cells that were both slowed in growth at low population density and enhanced in growth capacity at high density, a marker of neoplastic transformation. An experiment was designed to study the reversibility of these age-related properties by serial subculture at low density of the two uncloned cultures and their progeny clones derived from assuredly single cells. Both uncloned cultures had many transformed cells and a reduced growth rate on subculture. Serial subculture resulted in a gradual increase in growth rates of both populations, but a reversal of transformation only in the alpha population. The clones originating from both populations varied in the degree of growth impairment and neoplastic transformation. None of the alpha clones increased in growth rate on low density passage nor did the transformed clones among them revert to normal growth behavior. The fastest growing beta clone was originally slower than the control clone, but caught up to it after four weekly subcultures. The other beta clones retained their reduced growth rates. Four of the five beta clones, including the fastest grower, were transformed, and none reverted on subculture. We conclude that the apparent reversal of impaired growth and transformation in the uncloned parental alpha population resulted from the selective growth at low density of fast growing nontransformed clones. The reversal of impaired growth in the uncloned parental beta population was also the result of selective growth of fast growing clones, but in this case they were highly transformed so no apparent reversal of transformation occurred. The clonal results indicate that neither the impaired growth nor the neoplastic transformation found in aging cells is reversible. We discuss the possible contribution of epigenetic and genetic processes to these irreversible changes.

Full text

PDF
9793

Images in this article

9795Fig. 3
on p.9795
9797Fig. 9
on p.9797

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balassa G. Biochemical genetics of bacterial sporulation. I. Unidirectional pleiotropic interactions among genes controlling sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Gen Genet. 1969;104(1):73–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brand K. G., Buoen L. C., Johnson K. H., Brand I. Etiological factors, stages, and the role of the foreign body in foreign body tumorigenesis: a review. Cancer Res. 1975 Feb;35(2):279–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooks R. F., Richmond F. N., Riddle P. N., Richmond K. M. Apparent heterogeneity in the response of quiescent swiss 3T3 cells to serum growth factors: implications for the transition probability model and parallels with "cellular senescence" and "competence". J Cell Physiol. 1984 Nov;121(2):341–350. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041210211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brouty-Boyé D., Gresser I., Bandu M. T. Stability of the phenotypic reversion of x-ray transformed C3H/10T1/2 cells depends on cellular proliferation after subcultivation at low cell density. Carcinogenesis. 1982;3(9):1057–1061. doi: 10.1093/carcin/3.9.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brunk U., Ericsson J. L., Ponten J., Westermark B. Residual bodies and "aging" in cultured human glia cells. Effect of entrance into phase 3 and prolonged periods of confluence. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Apr;79(1):1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron I. L. Minimum number of cell doublings in an epithelial cell population during the life-span of the mouse. J Gerontol. 1972 Apr;27(2):157–161. doi: 10.1093/geronj/27.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ebbesen P. Cancer and normal ageing. Mech Ageing Dev. 1984 Jun;25(3):269–283. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng G., Tsui H. C., Winkler M. E. Depletion of the cellular amounts of the MutS and MutH methyl-directed mismatch repair proteins in stationary-phase Escherichia coli K-12 cells. J Bacteriol. 1996 Apr;178(8):2388–2396. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.8.2388-2396.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GREEN H., GOLDBERG B. KINETICS OF COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS BY ESTABLISHED MAMMALIAN CELL LINES. Nature. 1963 Dec 14;200:1097–1098. doi: 10.1038/2001097a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HAYFLICK L. THE LIMITED IN VITRO LIFETIME OF HUMAN DIPLOID CELL STRAINS. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Mar;37:614–636. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hadorn E. Proliferation and dynamics of cell heredity in blastema cultures of Drosophila. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1969 Jul;31:351–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LESHER S., FRY R. J., KOHN H. I. Age and the generation time of the mouse duodenal epithelial cell. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Aug;24:334–343. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90436-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lavrovsky V. A., Guvakova M. A., Lavrovsky Y. V. High frequency of tumour cell reversion to non-tumorigenic phenotype. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90375-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Linn S., Kairis M., Holliday R. Decreased fidelity of DNA polymerase activity isolated from aging human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2818–2822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maciera-Coelho A., Garcia-Giralt E., Adrian M. Changes in lysosomal associated structures in human fibroblasts kept in resting phase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1971 Nov;138(2):712–718. doi: 10.3181/00379727-138-35974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mollenhauer J., Bayreuther K. Donor-age-related changes in the morphology, growth potential, and collagen biosynthesis in rat fibroblast subpopulations in vitro. Differentiation. 1986;32(2):165–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1986.tb00569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Müntzing J., Nilsson T. Lipofuscin in malignant and non-malignant human prostatic tissue. Z Krebsforsch Klin Onkol Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1972;77(2):166–170. doi: 10.1007/BF00304055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noble R. L. Hormonal control of growth and progression in tumors of Nb rats and a theory of action. Cancer Res. 1977 Jan;37(1):82–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pendergrass W. R., Li Y., Jiang D., Fei R. G., Wolf N. S. Caloric restriction: conservation of cellular replicative capacity in vitro accompanies life-span extension in mice. Exp Cell Res. 1995 Apr;217(2):309–316. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reznikoff C. A., Bertram J. S., Brankow D. W., Heidelberger C. Quantitative and qualitative studies of chemical transformation of cloned C3H mouse embryo cells sensitive to postconfluence inhibition of cell division. Cancer Res. 1973 Dec;33(12):3239–3249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rubin A. L., Arnstein P., Rubin H. Physiological induction and reversal of focus formation and tumorigenicity in NIH 3T3 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):10005–10009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.10005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rubin A. L., Sneade-Koenig A., Rubin H. High rate of diversification and reversal among subclones of neoplastically transformed NIH 3T3 clones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4183–4186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rubin H., Chow M., Yao A. Cellular aging, destabilization, and cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1825–1830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rubin H., Yao A., Chow M. Heritable, population-wide damage to cells as the driving force of neoplastic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 23;92(11):4843–4847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rubin H., Yao A., Chow M. Neoplastic development: paradoxical relation between impaired cell growth at low population density and excessive growth at high density. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 15;92(17):7734–7738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schimke R. T. Gene amplification; what are we learning? Mutat Res. 1992 May;276(3):145–149. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(92)90004-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schneider E. L., Mitsui Y. The relationship between in vitro cellular aging and in vivo human age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3584–3588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Simpson I. N., Caten C. E. Induced quantitative variation for penicillin titre in clonal populations of Aspergillus nidulans. J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Jan;110(1):1–12. doi: 10.1099/00221287-110-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith G. J., Bell W. N., Grisham J. W. Clonal analysis of the expression of multiple transformation phenotypes and tumorigenicity by morphologically transformed 10T1/2 cells. Cancer Res. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):500–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith J. R., Pereira-Smith O. M., Schneider E. L. Colony size distributions as a measure of in vivo and in vitro aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Mar;75(3):1353–1356. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.3.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Summerhayes I. C., Franks L. M. Effects of donor age on neoplastic transformation of adult mouse bladder epithelium in vitro. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Apr;62(4):1017–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Thrasher J. D. Age and the cell cycle of the mouse esophageal epithelium. Exp Gerontol. 1971 Feb 1;6(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(71)90044-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolf N. S., Penn P. E., Jiang D., Fei R. G., Pendergrass W. R. Caloric restriction: conservation of in vivo cellular replicative capacity accompanies life-span extension in mice. Exp Cell Res. 1995 Apr;217(2):317–323. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van der Bosch J. Age-dependent decrease of growth responsiveness in density inhibited 3T3 cell populations and their interactions with SV 40-3T3 cells. J Cell Physiol. 1980 Aug;104(2):127–136. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041040202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES