Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Dec 5;1(6):e00854-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00854-13

Complete Genome of Bacillus pumilus Siphophage Blastoid

Scott J Mash a, Nicholas T Minahan b, Karthik R Chamakura a, Gabriel F Kuty Everett a,
PMCID: PMC3853047  PMID: 24309724

Abstract

Phage Blastoid is a siphophage that infects Bacillus pumilus. B. pumilus is widely used in agriculture but has recently been linked to cases of food poisoning. Here, we report the complete genome of Blastoid and discuss unique genomic characteristics.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus pumilus is a Gram-positive, sporulating, soil-dwelling bacterium. It is used in agriculture both as a symbiont to promote plant growth and as an antifungal agent of the root microenvironment (1, 2). B. pumilus has also been involved in cases of food poisoning, specifically rice and milk in 2007 (3, 4). Phage therapy has potential for use in the food industry for the prevention of food poisoning caused by B. pumilus. Here, we announce the genome of Blastoid, a siphophage that infects B. pumilus.

B. pumilus strain BL-8 was isolated on the campus of James Madison University (5). Phage Blastoid was obtained from a soil sample collected in Harrisonburg, VA. Phage DNA was sequenced using 454 pyrosequencing at the Emory GRA Genome Center (Emory University, Atlanta, GA). Trimmed FLX Titanium reads were assembled to a single contig at 30.7-fold coverage using the Newbler assembler version 2.5.3 (454 Life Sciences) with the default settings. PCR confirmed the completed contigs. Genes were predicted using GeneMarkS (6) and corrected using software tools available on the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) portal (https://cpt.tamu.edu/cpt-software/portal/). Transmission electron microscopy was performed at the University of Mary Washington.

Phage Blastoid has a 49,524-bp double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) unit genome with a G+C content of 42.5%, a 92.6% coding density, and 78 coding sequences. Of those, 46 were hypothetical conserved genes, three were novel hypothetical genes, and 29 have a putative function based on BLASTp and InterProScan analysis (7, 8). The TerL of Blastoid is homologous to the TerLs of phages with long terminal repeats. An examination of raw sequencing data using the Pause method (https://cpt.tamu.edu/cpt-software/releases/pause/) revealed an 830-bp terminal repeat.

Genomic analysis revealed a variety of genes encoding proteins whose functions include DNA replication, recombination, biosynthesis, morphogenesis, and lysis. The genes for replication and recombination proteins identified were helicase, primase, DNA polymerase III, a Holliday junction resolvase, and a variety of nucleases. Blastoid uses thymidylate synthase, deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinase, and serine/threonine kinase to aid in DNA and amino acid biosynthesis. The genes encoding morphogenesis proteins include those encoding a minor head protein, scaffold protein, tail completion protein, tape measure protein, tail fiber, and a tailspike protein with a pectin lyase domain. The tail fiber protein was identified by a fibronectin (fn 3) domain and its location in the genome (9). The lysis genes of phage Blastoid encode an N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase with a lysine motif (LysM) for peptidoglycan binding and a class II holin with two predicted transmembrane domains in an N-in C-in topology.

A unique gene in the genome encodes a putative cell division protein, FtsK/SpoIIIE. The FtsK/SpoIIIE protein is an ATPase involved in intracellular chromosomal DNA transfer in prokaryotes. In Gram-negative cells, FtsK is a DNA translocase that mediates the segregation of sister chromosomes into the daughter cells after replication (10). The Gram-positive homolog, SpoIIIE, pumps DNA into the forespore during sporulation (11). How this protein is involved in the phage infection cycle is not known.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of phage Blastoid was contributed as accession no. KF669648 to GenBank.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported primarily by funding from award no. EF-0949351, “Whole phage genomics: a student-based approach,” from the National Science Foundation. Additional support came from the Center for Phage Technology at Texas A&M University, Texas A&M University AgriLife, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff. This genome announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Phage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

Footnotes

Citation Mash SJ, Minahan NT, Chamakura KR, Kuty Everett GF. 2013. Complete genome of Bacillus pumilus siphophage Blastoid. Genome Announc. 1(6):e00854-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00854-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Joo GJ, Kim YM, Lee IJ, Song KS, Rhee IK. 2004. Growth promotion of red pepper plug seedlings and the production of gibberellins by Bacillus cereus, Bacillus macroides and Bacillus pumilus. Biotechnol. Lett. 26:487–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Thomas P. 2004. Isolation of Bacillus pumilus from in vitro grapes as a long-term alcohol-surviving and rhizogenesis inducing covert endophyte. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:114–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. From C, Hormazabal V, Granum PE. 2007. Food poisoning associated with pumilacidin-producing Bacillus pumilus in rice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 115:319–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Nieminen T, Rintaluoma N, Andersson M, Taimisto AM, Ali-Vehmas T, Seppälä A, Priha O, Salkinoja-Salonen M. 2007. Toxinogenic Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis from mastitic milk. Vet. Microbiol. 124:329–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lorenz L, Lins B, Barrett J, Montgomery A, Trapani S, Schindler A, Christie GE, Cresawn SG, Temple L. 2013. Genomic characterization of six novel Bacillus pumilus bacteriophages. Virology 444:374–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2607–2618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Das U, Daugherty L, Duquenne L, Finn RD, Gough J, Haft D, Hulo N, Kahn D, Kelly E, Laugraud A, Letunic I, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Madera M, Maslen J, McAnulla C, McDowall J, Mistry J, Mitchell A, Mulder N, Natale D, Orengo C, Quinn AF, Selengut JD, Sigrist CJ, Thimma M, Thomas PD, Valentin F, Wilson D, Wu CH, Yeats C. 2009. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D211–D215. 10.1093/nar/gkn785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fraser JS, Yu Z, Maxwell KL, Davidson AR. 2006. Ig-like domains on bacteriophages: a tale of promiscuity and deceit. J. Mol. Biol. 359:496–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Stouf M, Meile JC, Cornet F. 2013. FtsK actively segregates sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110:11157–11162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Burton BM, Marquis KA, Sullivan NL, Rapoport TA, Rudner DZ. 2007. The ATPase SpoIIIE transports DNA across fused septal membranes during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 131:1301–1312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES