To the Editor
Total reduced glutathione (GSH), the main pulmonary anti-oxidant, is increased in asthma patients and, in some studies, increased amounts of oxidised glutathione (GSSG) were also found. In addition, enzymes that regulate the GSH redox cycle are altered in asthmatics (reviewed in [1]).
GSH, with its redox cycle partners, serves to maintain the reduced state of protein thiols, which can be achieved by scavenging oxidants or by the covalent reversible binding of GSH to protein thiols. The latter occurs under physiological conditions, is induced upon mild oxidative stress and is known as S-glutathionylation (PSSG) [2]. PSSG protects targeted thiols from irreversible oxidations and can modulate protein function. Of significant relevance in asthma, SERCA (sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase) is activated by PSSG, increasing smooth muscle relaxation, and PSSG of the RyR (ryanodine receptor) calcium channel was associated with impaired coupling. With respect to inflammation, nuclear factor-κB and activator protein-1 are negatively affected by PSSG (reviewed in [2]).
GSH can be removed from proteins by glutaredoxins (Grx), which restores the function of proteins targeted by PSSG [2]. The Grx1 isoform localises to the cytosol, and Grx2 to mitochondria and the nucleus. Grx1 can also reduce low molecular weight disulfides and, thus, proteins with functionally important disulfide bonds could also be affected by Grx1 alterations.
In contrast to damaging oxidations and measurements of GSH, PSSG and Grx have rarely been studied in lung diseases, and never in conjunction. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Grx1-positive alveolar macrophages were negatively correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and sputum Grx1 levels were higher during exacerbations [3]. In a murine model of allergic airway disease, we found increased Grx1 expression and activity [4].
Given the importance of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of asthma and the critical role GSH homeostasis plays therein, we conducted a study evaluating Grx1 and PSSG levels in induced sputum from 33 asthmatics and nine healthy controls (table 1).
Table 1.
Healthy controls | Asthmatics |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Eosinophilic | Neutrophilic | Paucigranulocytic | ||
Subjects | 9 | 33 | 15 | 8 | 10 |
Age yrs | 47.0±8.1 | 44.6±12.8 | 44.5±3.7 | 47.2±3.9 | 41.9±4.0 |
Males/females | 6/3 | 17/16 | 8/7 | 4/4 | 4/6 |
Never-/ex-/current smokers | 5/4 | 17/16 | 5/10 | 7/1# | 5/5 |
Smoking exposure pack-yrs | 19.6±26.8 | 21.4±17.7 | 20.1±7.4 | 60 | 13.9±4.9 |
BMI kg·m−2 | 25.2±4.2 | 25.7±4.6 | 24.9±1.0 | 24.7±1.7 | 27.0±1.7 |
FEV1 % pred | 108.6±16.9 | 76.1±22.2* | 70.9±7.1* | 74.1±7.1* | 85.1±4.5* |
FVC % pred | 113.2±20.6 | 86.5±22.7* | 90.9±5.0* | 73.8±13.3* | 92.5±4.0* |
FEV1/FVC | 82.0±8.9 | 69.8±14.3* | 65.0±4.1* | 67.8±3.6* | 76.8±3.8 |
FeNO ppb | 17.9 (3.7–235) | 43 (10.6–235) | 22.2 (5.4–66.3) | 11 (3.7–80.9)# | |
Oral CS | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
Inhaled CS budesonide equivalents
per day |
2000 (0–6000) | 2000 (0–3000) | 1600 (0–4000) | ||
LABA | 11 | 7 | 8 | ||
LTRA | 7 | 4 | 5 | ||
Theophylline | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
Sputum eosinophils % | 0 (0–3.2) | 0.9 (0–72.2)* | 18.6 (3.4–72.2)* | 0 (0–0.8)# | 0.4 (0–2.4)# |
Sputum neutrophils % | 16 (0–62.8) | 48.3 (4–100)* | 44.2 (4–65) | 94.8 (75.7–100)*# | 46.7 (17.6–69.6)¶ |
ACQ score | 2.78±1.32 | 2.7±0.4 | 3.3±0.5 | 2.3±0.3 | |
AQLQ score | 3.78±1.10 | 3.9±0.3 | 3.4±0.4 | 4.1±0.4 |
Data are presented as n, mean±SD or median (range). BMI: body mass index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; % pred: % predicted; FVC: forced vital capacity; FeNO: exhaled nitric oxide fraction; CS: corticosteroids; LABA: long-acting β-agonists; LTRA: leukotriene receptor antagonist; ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.
p<0.05 versus healthy control subjects
p<0.05 versus eosinophilic asthma
p<0.05 versus neutrophilic asthma.
Sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline and Grx1 in the supernatant was analysed by Western blotting. To determine PSSG content, 1% sodium borohydride was used to remove GSH from sputum supernatant protein pellets and GSH was quantified using the Ellman’s reagent GSSG reductase recycling method.
RNA was extracted from ciliated epithelial cells isolated during bronchoscopy in three healthy controls and three asthma patients. Quantitative PCR was performed using primers for Grx1, Grx2 and glutaraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase. Relative quantity was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method.
The level of Grx1 protein in sputum was significantly increased in asthmatics compared with controls (fig. 1). Interestingly, an extra band below Grx1 was observed in 32% of patients. Grx2 was undetectable. Consistent with the function of Grx1, the PSSG level was significantly decreased in sputum of asthmatics and negatively correlated with Grx1 (r=0.518, p=0.001).
We next categorised asthmatics as eosinophilic, neutrophilic, paucigranulocytic or mixed based on published values for sputum eosinophil percentages [5] and the internal reference value of 76% for neutrophils established in our clinic, since an intricate relationship between Grx/PSSG and inflammation has been observed. Thus, 15 patients were labelled eosinophilic, eight neutrophilic, 10 paucigranulocytic and none as mixed. Lung function, asthma control and quality of life did not differ between cellular phenotypes. Grx1 protein levels were specifically enhanced in eosinophilic and paucigranulocytic but not in neutrophilic asthmatics. PSSG levels were decreased only in eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthmatics compared with healthy controls. We then assessed associations with total and differential cell percentages in induced sputum. Total cell numbers were found to be positively related to Grx1 levels (r=0.425, p=0.006) and negatively to PSSG (r= −0.632, p<0.001). PSSG levels were positively related to epithelial cell (r=0.601, p<0.001), squamous cell (r=0.355, p=0.025) and lymphocyte percentages (r=0.362, p=0.022), and negatively related to the percentage of viable cells (r= −0.441, p=0.004) in the entire study population and in asthma patients. Grx1 sputum levels did not correlate with specific sputum cell types. Since we demonstrated increased Grx1 expression in airway epithelial cells in a mouse model of allergic airway disease, we investigated Grx mRNA expression in primary bronchial epithelial cells obtained from asthmatics and controls. A higher level of Grx1 mRNA expression was indeed present in epithelial cells isolated from asthmatics compared with cells isolated from controls. Grx2 mRNA levels were not different.
The increased Grx1 protein levels in the induced sputum of asthmatics could be part of the protective response of the lungs to oxidative stress. Enhancing extracellular Grx1 could serve to increase free GSH directly as opposed to via transcriptional upregulation of γ-glutamylcysteinyl ligase. The protein thiols could be returned to their reduced state, which is unlikely since the GSH/GSSG ratio is not increased in asthma [1]. Alternatively, loss of this protective modification would leave proteins susceptible to damaging oxidations. Carbonylated albumin and α1-antitrypsin have indeed been detected in sputum of asthmatics [6].
In human lungs, Grx1 has been demonstrated predominantly in macrophages and epithelial cells [7]. Here, Grx1 levels did not correlate with the macrophage percentage in induced sputum, but a higher level of Grx1 mRNA expression was found in primary bronchial epithelial cells from asthmatics compared with controls, making bronchial epithelial cells the most likely source of sputum Grx1. Furthermore, in vitro studies have demonstrated Grx1 in culture supernatants, which reflected expression profiles [8], and probably involves active nonclassical secretion.
In this study, we also show that sputum PSSG levels were significantly decreased in patients with asthma, especially in the two inflammatory phenotypes. However, no correlation with the percentage of eosinophils or neutrophils was observed. This is in agreement with an earlier observed lack of PSSG reactivity in neutrophils [9]. The likelihood of epithelial cells as a source of Grx1 in sputum contrasts with the positive relationship of sputum epithelial cells to PSSG, although epithelial cells in sputum could represent a different pool from those isolated by brushing. These data indicate that PSSG is not only influenced by Grx1 levels but probably also oxidative stress related to the inflammatory state of the lungs. Anti-inflammatory therapy did not relate to PSSG or Grx1 levels.
Importantly, FEV1 % predicted negatively correlated with sputum Grx1 levels (r= −0.314, p=0.04) and positively with PSSG (r=0.336, p=0.032) in the whole study group. When restricting the analyses to all asthma patients, these correlations did not remain significant. However, Grx1 in eosinophilic asthmatics specifically still negatively correlated with FEV1 % pred (r= −0.532, p=0.04) and PSSG correlated positively with FEV1 % pred in neutrophilic patients (r=0.750, p=0.05).
Thus, a better lung function is associated with lower Grx1 and higher PSSG levels in induced sputum. Conversely, in COPD, Grx1-positive macrophages in lung tissue positively correlated with FEV1, while there was no information on PSSG[3]. Here, we lack information on PSSG in specific cell types and it is difficult to extrapolate these findings to the Grx/PSSG axis in lung tissue.
In addition to its positive correlation with FEV1 in neutrophilic asthmatics, PSSG also negatively correlated to the degree of disease control in this phenotype as assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (r= −0.750, p=0.05). Therefore, sputum PSSG is linked to neutrophilic asthma and associated with disease control.
In addition to studying alterations in mRNA and protein levels, classical post-translational modifications and generic antioxidants, these data show that PSSG of targets relevant to asthma should be further investigated as they could play a key role in pathophysiology and, possibly, treatment, since Grx/PSSG alterations as a cause or a consequence of the disease are related to clinical manifestations.
Acknowledgments
Support Statement: This study was supported by NUTRIM, a VENI grant from NWO/ZonMW (016.086.090) awarded to N.L. Reynaert and IUAP P6/35 supported by the Belgian Federal Government.
Footnotes
Statement of Interest: Statements of interest for Y.M.W. Janssen-Heininger and C.G. Irvin can be found at www.erj. ersjournals.com/site/misc/statements.xhtml
References
- 1.Reynaert NL. Glutathione biochemistry in asthma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1810:1045–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xiong Y, Uys JD, Tew KD, et al. S-glutathionylation: from molecular mechanisms to health outcomes. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15:233–270. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peltoniemi MJ, Rytila PH, Harju TH, et al. Modulation of glutaredoxin in the lung and sputum of cigarette smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2006;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reynaert NL, Wouters EF, Janssen-Heininger YM. Modulation of glutaredoxin-1 expression in a mouse model of allergic airway disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36:147–151. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0259RC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brightling CE. Sputum induction in asthma: a research technique or a clinical tool? Chest. 2006;129:503–504. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.3.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nagai K, Betsuyaku T, Konno S, et al. Diversity of protein carbonylation in allergic airway inflammation. Free Radic Res. 2008;42:921–929. doi: 10.1080/10715760802555585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Peltoniemi M, Kaarteenaho-Wiik R, Saily M, et al. Expression of glutaredoxin is highly cell specific in human lung and is decreased by transforming growth factor-β in vitro and in interstitial lung diseases in vivo. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:1000–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lundberg M, Fernandes AP, Kumar S, et al. Cellular and plasma levels of human glutaredoxin 1 and 2 detected by sensitive ELISA systems. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;319:801–809. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aesif SW, Anathy V, Guala AS, et al. Ablation of glutaredoxin-1 attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced lung inflammation and alveolar macrophage activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44:491–499. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0136OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]